‘Developments in the Law: Corporations and Society’. Harvard Law Review, 117(7) (2004), 2169–2295.CrossRef

‘The Myth of Context in Politics and Law’. Harvard Law Review, 110(6) (1997), 1292–1309.CrossRef

Abramovitz, M.Taxes Are a Woman's Issue: Reframing the Debate. (New York, NY: Feminist Press at the City University of New York, 2007).Google Scholar

Abreu, A. ‘Tax Counts: Bringing Money-Law to LatCrit’. Denver University Law Review, 78 (2000), 575–93.Google Scholar

Ahlander, N. R. and Bahr, K. S.. ‘Beyond Drudgery, Power, and Equity: Toward an Expanded Discourse on the Moral Dimensions of Housework in Families’. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(1) (1995), 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alba, R. M.Offshore Centres of Latin America and the Caribbean: The Need for a Level Playing Field in the Search for Integrity. Twenty First International Symposium on Economic Crime, Jesus College, University of Cambridge, vol. 11 (2003) (at: www.freedomandprosperity.org/alba.pdf).Google Scholar

Alldridge, P. and Mumford, A.. ‘Tax Evasion and the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002’. Legal Studies, 25 (2005), 353–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., Dickert-Conlin, S. and Whittington, L. A.. ‘Policy Watch: The Marriage Penalty’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(3) (1999), 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alstott, A. L. ‘Tax Policy and Feminism: Competing Goals and Institutional Choices’. Columbia Law Review, 96(8) (1996), 2001–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alstott, A. L.No Exit: What Parents Owe Their Children and What Society Owes Parents. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Alvarez, R. M. and McCaffery, E. J.. ‘Gender and Tax’. Gender and American Politics: Women, Men, and the Political Process; Social Science Working Paper 1046: California Institute of Technology, 1998 (at: www.hss.caltech.edu/SSPapers/wp1046.pdf).

Alvarez, R. M. and McCaffery, E. I.. ‘Gender and Tax’, in Tolleson-Rinehart, S and Josephson, J. J (eds.), Gender and American Politics: Women, Men, and the Political Process (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2000), pp. 91–114.Google Scholar

Amenta, E., Bonastia, C. and Caren, N.. ‘US Social Policy in Comparative and Historical Perspective: Concepts, Images, Arguments, and Research Strategies’. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1) (2001), 213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anne Tempel, P. W. ‘Global Standardization of Organizational Forms and Management Practices? What New Institutionalism and the Business-systems Approach Can Learn from Each Other’. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1) (2007), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, K. A. ‘Legal Integration: Theorizing the Legal Dimension of European Integration’. Journal of Common Market Studies – Annual Review, 36(2) (1998), 155–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, K. A. ‘The “Europeanisation” of Social Exclusion: British Adaptation to EU Co-ordination’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 8(1) (2006), 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aspers, P., Kohl, S., Roine, J. and Wichardt, P.. ‘An Economic Sociological Look at Economics’. Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter, 9(2) (March 2008).Google Scholar

Atkins, S. ‘The Sex Discrimination Act 1975: The End of a Decade’. Feminist Review, (24) (1986), 57–70.

Auchmuty, R. ‘Same-sex Marriage Revived: Feminist Critique and Legal Strategy’. Feminism and Psychology, 14(1) (2004), 101–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avery Jones, J. ‘Are Tax Treaties Necessary?’ Tax Law Review, 53 (1999), 1–38.Google Scholar

Avi-Yonah, R. S. ‘Corporations, Society, and the State: A Defense of the Corporate Tax’. Virginia Law Review, 90(5) (2004), 1193–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avi-Yonah, R. S.Corporate Social Responsibility and Strategic Tax Behavior. SSRN, 2006 (at: http://ssrn.com/paper=944793).

Baber, K. and Allen, K.. Women and Families: Feminist Reconstructions. (New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Baden, S. and Goetz, A. M.. ‘Who Needs [Sex] When You Can Have [Gender]? Conflicting Discourses on Gender at Beijing’. Feminist Review, 56 (1997), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, I. C. and Alternatives Canadian Centre for Policy, ‘Gender Budget Initiatives: Why They Matter in Canada’, Technical Paper 1, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, 2006.

Bala, N. and Bromwich, R.. ‘Context and Inclusivity in Canada's Evolving Definition of the Family’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 16(2) (2002), 145–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banerjee, S. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’. Critical Sociology, 34(1) (2008), 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bank, T. W.Gender Equality as Smart Economics. (January 2002) (at: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTGENDER/0,,menuPK:336874∼pagePK:149018∼piPK:149093∼theSitePK:336868,00.html).Google Scholar

Bankman, J. and Griffith, T.. ‘Social Welfare and the Rate Structure: A New Look At Progressive Taxation’. California Law Review, 75(6) (1987), 1905–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, N. ‘Sex and the Civil Partnership Act: The Future of (Non) Conjugality?’ Feminist Legal Studies, 14(2) (2006), 241–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barmes, L. and Ashtiany, W. S.. ‘The Diversity Approach to Achieving Equality: Potential and Pitfalls’. Industrial Law Journal, 32(4) (2003), 274–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, K. and Grown, C.. Gender Impacts of Government Revenue Collection: The Case of Taxation. (Commonwealth Secretariat, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bashevkin, S. ‘From Tough Times to Better Times: Feminism, Public Policy, and New Labour Politics in Britain’. International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique, 21(4) (2000), 407–24.Google Scholar

Beatson, J. ‘Has the Common Law a Future?’ Cambridge Law Journal, 56(02) (2009), 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckert, J. ‘The great transformation of embeddedness: Karl Polanyi and the new economic sociology’. Manuscript. (2006) (at: www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp07–1.pdf).

Beneria, L. ‘Globalization, Gender, and the Davos Man’, in Mutari, E and Figart, D. M. (eds.), Women and the Economy: A Reader (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2003), pp. 312–25.Google Scholar

Bennett, C. J. ‘What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?’ British Journal of Political Science, 21(2) (1991), 215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, F. ‘Policy Implications of Tax Credits’ (at: www.genet.ac.uk/workpapers/GeNet 2005 p8.pdf).

Bergmann, B. R. ‘What Policies Toward Lone Mothers Should We Aim For?’ Feminist Economics, 10(2) (2004), 240–6.Google Scholar

Berland, J. ‘On Reading “the Weather”’. Cultural Studies, 8(1) (1994), 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernburg, J. G. ‘Anomie, Social Change and Crime: A Theoretical Examination of Institutional–Anomie Theory’. British Journal of Criminology, 42 (2002), 729–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beveridge, F. ‘Building against the Past: The Impact of Mainstreaming on EU Gender Law and Policy’. European Law Review, 32(2) (2007), 193–212.Google Scholar

Bevir, M. ‘Narrating the British State: An Interpretive Critique of New Labour's Institutionalism’. Review of International Political Economy, 10(3) (2003), 455–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biswas, R.International Tax Competition: Globalisation and Fiscal Sovereignty. (Commonwealth Secretariat, 2002).Google Scholar

Bittker, B. I. ‘Federal Income Taxation and the Family’. Stanford Law Review, 27 (1975), 1389–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bittker, B. I. ‘Dedication: Charles Stuart Lyon – Being an Epitome of His Letters, Marginalia, Graffiti, and Other Fugitive Scribblings’. Tax Law Review, 37 (1981), 159–92.Google Scholar

Black, A. and Brooke, S.. ‘The Labour Party, Women, and the Problem of Gender, 1951–1966’. Journal of British Studies, 36(4) (1997), 419–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Block, F. ‘Karl Polanyi and the Writing of the Great Transformation’. Theory and Society, 32(3) (2003), 275–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blom-Hansen, J. ‘A “New Institutional” Perspective on Policy Networks’. Public Administration, 75(4) (1997), 669–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumberg, R. L. ‘A General Theory of Gender Stratification’. Sociological Theory, 2 (1984), 23–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blundell, R. and Meghir, C.. ‘Active Labour Market Policy vs Employment Tax Credits: Lessons from Recent UK Reforms’. Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation Working Paper No. 1. (2002).

Blundell, R., Duncan, A., McCrae, J. and Meghir, C.. ‘The Labour Market Impact of the Working Families’ Tax Credit'. Fiscal Studies, 21(1) (2000), 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borison, J. ‘Alice through a Very Dark and Confusing Looking Glass: Getting Equity from the Tax Court in Innocent Spouse Cases’. Family Law Quarterly, 30 (1996), 123–72.Google Scholar

Boschken, H. L. ‘Institutionalism: Intergovernmental Exchange, Administration-centered Behavior, and Policy Outcomes in Urban Agencies’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(4) (1998), 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boskin, M. J. and Sheshinski, E.. Optimal Tax Treatment of the Family: Married Couples. NBER Working Paper No. 368, 1984 (also Reprint No. r0468) (at: www.nber.org/papers/W0368.pdf).Google Scholar

Bossons, J. ‘The Value of a Comprehensive Tax Base as a Tax Reform Goal’. Journal of Law and Economics, 13(2) (1970), 327–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, T. Taxation of the Family. Tax Law Review Committee Discussion Paper No. 6 (April 2007).

Boyd, S. B.Challenging the Public/Private Divide: Feminism, Law, and Public Policy (University of Toronto Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, S. B. ‘Family, Law and Sexuality: Feminist Engagements’. Social and Legal Studies, 8(3) (1999), 369–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, S. B. and Young, C. F. L.. ‘Feminism, Law, and Public Policy: Family Feuds and Taxing Times’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 42(4) (2004), 545–82.Google Scholar

Bradford, D.et al. ‘The Incidence and Allocation Effects of a Tax on Corporate Distributions’ (NBER Working Paper, 1981).

Bradley, M., Schipani, C. A., Sundaram, A. K. and Walsh, J. P.. ‘The Purposes and Accountability of the Corporation in Contemporary Society: Corporate Governance at a Crossroads’. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(3) (1999), 9–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, J.Markets in Vice, Markets in Virtue (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Brazer, H. E. ‘The Report of the Royal Commission on Taxation’. Journal of Finance, 22(4) (1967), 671–83.Google Scholar

Brazier, A. ‘The Fiscal Maze: Parliament, Government and Public Money’. Parliamentary Affairs (Hansard Society), 60(2) (16 March 2007), 346–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, M., Duncan, A., Shephard, A. and Suarez, M.. ‘Did Working Families’ Tax Credit Work? The Impact of In-work Support on Labour Supply in Great Britain'. Labour Economics, 13(6) (2006), 699–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, K. and Parkes, D.. ‘Queering Legal Education: A Project of Theoretical Discovery’. Harvard Women's Law Journal, 27 (2004), 89–136.Google Scholar

Brooks, N.‘The Irrelevance of Conjugal Relationships in Assessing Tax Liability’ Tax Units and the Tax Rate Scale (1996) (at: http://law.harvard.edu. http://law.harvard.edu).

Brudney, V. ‘The Independent Director – Heavenly City or Potemkin Village?’ Harvard Law Review, 95 (1982), 597–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brush, L. D. ‘The Curious Courtship of Feminist Jurisprudence and Feminist State Theory: Smart on the Power of Law’. Law and Social Inquiry, 19(4) (1994), 1059–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budlender, D.The South African Women's Budget Initiative. Meeting on Women and Political Participation: 21st Century Challenges, United Nations Development Programme, New Delhi, India. Edn. BPN 2.166166 (24–26 March 1999) (at: http://iggi.unesco.or.kr/web/iggi_docs/02/952310746.pdf).Google Scholar

Budlender, D. ‘The Political Economy of Women's Budgets in the South’. World Development, 28(7) (2000), 1365–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budlender, D., Elson, D., Hewitt, G. and Mukhopadhyay, T.. Gender Budgets Make Cents: Understanding Gender Responsive Budgets. Gender Responsive Budget Initiatives (Commonwealth Secretariat, 2002).Google Scholar

Budlender, D., Sharp, R. and Allen, K.. How to Do a Gender-sensitive Budget Analysis: Contemporary Research and Practice (Commonwealth Secretariat, 1998).Google Scholar

Bulmer, S. J. ‘New Institutionalism and the Governance of the Single European Market’. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(3) (1998), 365–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burghes, L., Clarke, L. and Cronin, N.. Fathers and Fatherhood in Britain. (London: Family Policy Studies Centre, 1997).Google Scholar

Burk, M. ‘A Feminist Tea Party?: Time to Start Righting the Tax System's Wrongs’. Ms Magazine, 17 (2007) (at: www.msmagazine.com/spring2007/afeministteaparty.asp).Google Scholar

Burns, N. ‘Finding Gender’. Politics and Gender, 1(01) (2005), 137–41.Google Scholar

Burton, M. ‘Responsive Regulation and the Uncertainty of Tax Law’. eJournal of Tax Research, 5(1) (July 2007), 71–104.Google Scholar

Butler, J. ‘Merely Cultural’. Social Text, 52/53 (1997), 265–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrne, D. M. ‘Progressive Taxation Revisited’. Arizona Law Review, 37 (1995), 739–89.Google Scholar

Cain, P. A. ‘Heterosexual Privilege and the Internal Revenue Code’. University of San Francisco Law Review, 34 (2000), 465–94.Google Scholar

Cain, P. A. ‘Federal Tax Consequences of Civil Unions’. Capital University Law Review, 30 (2002), 387–408.Google Scholar

Cain, P. M. ‘Taxing Lesbians’. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, 6 (1996–7), 471.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. L. ‘The State and Fiscal Sociology’. Annual Review of Sociology 19 (1993), 163–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, A. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct’. Business and Society, 38(3) (1999), 268–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, A. M. ‘Income-tax Allowances and the Family in Great Britain’. Population Studies, 6(3) (1953), 218–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, K. L. M. ‘Canadian Tax Reform and Henry Simons’. Journal of Law and Economics, 11(2) (1968), 231–42.Google Scholar

Castles, F. G. and Flood, M.. ‘Divorce, the Law and Social Context: Families of Nations and the Legal Dissolution of Marriage’. Acta Sociologica, 34(4) (1991), 279–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Çeagatay, N. ‘Gender Budgets and Beyond: Feminist Fiscal Policy in the Context of Globalisation’. Gender and Development, 11(1) (2003), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, W. ‘Women, Childcare and Taxation’. Kings' College Law Journal, 10 (1999), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cherry, R. ‘Rational Choice and the Price of Marriage’, in Moe, K. S. (ed.), Women, Family, and Work: Writings on the Economics of Gender (London: Blackwell, 2003).Google Scholar

Chow, E. N. L. and Berheide, C. W.. ‘The Interdependence of Family and Work: A Framework for Family Life Education, Policy, and Practice’. Family Relations, 37(1) (1988), 23–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, J. and Trivedi, V. U.. ‘The Effect of Friendly Persuasion and Gender on Tax Compliance Behavior’. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(2) (2003), 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarkson, M. B. E. ‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’. Academy of Management Review, 20(1) (1995), 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clemens, E. S. ‘Good Reasons to Stop Avoiding Taxes’. Law and Social Inquiry, 24(2) (1999), 517–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clemens, E. S. and Cook, J.. ‘Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change’. Annual Reviews in Sociology, 25(1) (1999), 441–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clement, K. ‘Environmental Auditing for Industry: A European Perspective’. European Environment, 1(3) (1991), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. H. ‘The New Institutional Economics’. American Economic Review, 88 (1998), 72–4.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. ‘Where the Action is: On the Site of Distributive Justice’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 26(1) (1997), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colinvaux, R. P. ‘Income Tax Liability of Married Women’. Modern Law Review, 11(3) (1948), 346–7.Google Scholar

Collins, P. ‘It's All in the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation’. Hypatia (1998), 62–82.

Conaghan, J. ‘Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law’. Journal of Law and Society, 27(3) (2000), 351–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connell, R. W. ‘The Big Picture: Masculinities in Recent World History’. Theory and Society, 22(5) (1993), 597–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, K. ‘The Power of Sociological Ideas’. Sociological Perspectives, 34(2) (1991), 115–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copelon, R. ‘International Human Rights Dimensions of Intimate Violence: Another Strand in the Dialectic of Feminist Lawmaking’. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, 11 (2003), 865–76.Google Scholar

Cornell, D. ‘Review: Sexual Difference, the Feminine, and Equivalency: A Critique of MacKinnon's Toward a Feminist Theory of the State’. Yale Law Journal, 100(7) (1991), 2247–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornwall, A. ‘Whose Voices? Whose Choices? Reflections on Gender and Participatory Development’. World Development, 31(8) (2003), 1325–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterrell, R.Seeking Similarity, Appreciating Difference: Comparative Law and Communities. Comparative Law in the Twenty-First Century. Örücü, E and Harding, A, (eds.), vol. 4. (The Hague: Kluwer, 2002).Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R.Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar

Coutts, J. A. ‘Income Tax Liability of Married Women’. Modern Law Review, 12(1) (1949), 110–12.Google Scholar

Crawford, B. J. ‘Outsourcing Intimacy: The Taxation of Powers of Attorney’ (2007) (at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1397&context=lawfaculty).

Crawford, B. J. ‘Tax Avatars’. Utah Law Review (2008), 793–833 (at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1549&context=lawfaculty).

Crawford, C. and Freedman, J.. ‘Small Business Taxation: A Special Study of the Structural Issues Surrounding the Taxation of Business Profits of Owner Managed Firms’. Prepared for the Report of a Commission on Reforming the Tax System for the 21st Century, Chaired by Sir James Mirrlees (21 April 2008) (at: www.competition-law.ox.ac.uk/tax/documents/Dimensions_Tax_Design_MR2008.pdf, or www.ifs.org.uk/mirrleesreview/press_docs/small_businesses.pdf, at 22–3, on the IFS website).

Creedy, J. and Gemmell, N.. ‘Corporation Tax Buoyancy and Revenue Elasticity In the UK’. Economic Modelling, 25(1) (2008), 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cretney, S. M.Family Law in the Twentieth Century (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Crowther, B. ‘Viewing What Comes Naturally: A Feminist Approach to Television Natural History’. Women's Studies International Forum, 20(2) (1997), 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daly, M. ‘Gender Mainstreaming in Theory and Practice’. Social Politics, 12 (2005), 433–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daly, M. and Clavero, S.. Contemporary Family Policy: A Comparative Review of Ireland, France, Germany, Sweden and the UK (London: Institute of Public Administration, 2002).Google Scholar

Daunton, M.What Is Income? Studies in the History of Tax Law, Tiley, J (ed.) (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), pp. 3–14.Google Scholar

Davies, H., Joshi, H. and Peronaci, R.. ‘Forgone Income and Motherhood: What Do Recent British Data Tell U?’ Population Studies, 54(3) (2000), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dearden, L. ‘PBR Analysis: Childcare Strategy’ (December 2004) (at: www.ifs.org.uk/publications/3196).

Deech, R. ‘The Case against Legal Recognition of Cohabitation’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 29(2–3) (2008), 480–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delphy, C. and Leonard, D.. ‘A Materialist Feminism Is Possible’. Feminist Review, (4) (1980), 79–105.

Demleitner, N. V. ‘A Response to Mathias Reimann: More, More, More But Real Comparative Law’. Tulane European and Civil Law Forum, 11 (1996), 73–83.Google Scholar

Dennis, J. M. ‘The Lessons of Comparable Worth: A Feminist Vision of Law and Economic Theory’. UCLA Women's Law Journal, 4 (1993), 1–36.Google Scholar

Dequech, D. ‘The Demarcation between the “Old” and the “New” Institutional Economics: Recent Complications’. Journal of Economic Issues, 36(2) (2002), 565–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devereux, M., Griffith, R., Klemm, A., Thum, M. and Ottaviani, M.. ‘Corporate Income Tax Reforms and International Tax Competition’. Economic Policy (2002), 449–95.

Dingeldey, I. ‘European Tax Systems and their Impact on Family Employment Patterns’. Journal of Social Policy, 30(04) (2001), 653–72.Google Scholar

Dodd, Jr., , E. M. ‘For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees?’ Harvard Law Review, 45(7) (1932), 1145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolan, J. ‘In Defense of the Discourse: Materialist Feminism, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism… And Theory’. TDR (1988–) 33(3) (1989), 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drenth, A., Knijn, T. and Lewis, J.. ‘Sources of Income for Lone Mother Families: Policy Changes in Britain and the Netherlands and the Experiences of Divorced Women’. Journal of Social Policy, 28(04) (2000), 619–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Driver, S. and Martell, L.. ‘New Labour, Work and the Family’. Social Policy and Administration, 36(1) (2002), 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,DTI. ‘Gender Analysis of Expenditure Project’ (Final Report) (July 2004) (at: www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/research/gender_analysis.pdf).

Duncan, S. and Edwards, R.. ‘Lone Mothers and Paid Work – Rational Economic Man or Gendered Moral Rationalities?’ Feminist Economics, 3(2) (1997), 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkheim, E. ‘The Conjugal Family’, in Emile Durkheim on Institutional Analysis, ed. and trans. Traugott, M (Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, 1978), pp. 229–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, R.Liberalism (orig. pub.), Public and Private Morality, Hampshire, Stuart (ed.) (Cambridge University Press, 1978), in J. Nida-Rumelin and W. Vossenkuhl (eds.), Ethische und Politische (Cambridge, MA: Walter de Gruyter, 1998).Google Scholar

Eggertsson, T. ‘The Old Theory of Economic Policy and the New Institutionalism’. World Development, 25(8) (1997), 1187–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eggertsson, T. ‘Rethinking the Theory of Economic Policy: Some Implications of the New Institutionalism’, in Nelson, J. M., Tilly, C. and Walker, L. (eds.), Transforming Post-communist Political Economies (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1997), pp. 61–79.Google Scholar

Ehrenreich, B. and Hochschild, A.. Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy (New York, NY: Metropolitan Books, 2003).Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. ‘Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review’. Academy of Management Review (1989) 57–74.

Eissa, N. and Liebman, J. B.. Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellwood, D. T. ‘The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit and Social Policy Reforms on Work, Marriage, and Living Arrangements’. National Tax Journal, 53(4) (2000), 1063–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellwood, D. T. and Liebman, J. B.. ‘The Middle-class Parent Penalty: Child Benefits in the US Tax Code’, in Poterba, James M (ed.),Tax Policy and the Economy (Boston, MA: MIT Press, 2001).Google Scholar

England, K.Who Will Mind the Baby?: Geographies of Childcare and Working Mothers (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

Epstein, R.Simple Rules for a Complex World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Ergas, Y.Child-care Policies in Comparative Perspective an Introductory Discussion. Lone-Parent Families: The Economic Challenge (Paris: OECD, 1990).Google Scholar

Erhel, C. and Zajdela, H.. ‘The Dynamics of Social and Labour Market Policies in France and the United Kingdom: Between Path Dependence and Convergence’. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(2) (2004), 125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erturk, Y. ‘Considering the Role of Men in Gender Agenda Setting: Conceptual and Policy Issues’. Feminist Review, 78 (2004), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Espeland, W. N. and Stevens, M. L.. ‘Commensuration as a Social Process’. Annual Review of Sociology, 24 (1998), 313–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fagan, E. D. ‘Recent and Contemporary Theories of Progressive Taxation’. Journal of Political Economy, 46(4) (1938), 457–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fahey, T. ‘The Family Economy in the Development of Welfare Regimes: A Case Study’. European Sociological Review, 18(1) (2002), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fallan, L. ‘Gender, Exposure to Tax Knowledge, and Attitudes Towards Taxation; An Experimental Approach’. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(2) (1999), 173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farmer, P. and Lyal, R.. EC Tax Law (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Fedeli, S. and Forte, F.. ‘Joint Income-tax and VAT-chain Evasion’. European Journal of Political Economy, 15(3) (1999), 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feenberg, D. R.The Tax Treatment of Married Couples and the 1981 Tax Law. Working Paper No. 872 (Cambridge, MA, USA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1983) (at: www.nber.org/papers/w0872.pdf).Google Scholar

Fellows, M. L. ‘Rocking the Tax Code: A Case Study of Employment-related Child-care Expenditures’. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 10 (1998), 307–95.Google Scholar

Fischl, R. ‘A Woman's World’. Buffalo Law Review, 52 (2004), 659–78.Google Scholar

Fitch, H. G. ‘Achieving Corporate Social Responsibility’. Academy of Management Review, 1(1) (1976), 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Folbre, N. ‘Blowing the Whistle on Poverty Policy’. Review of Social Economy, 61(4) (2003), 479–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fontana, M. ‘Modelling the Effects of Trade on Women, at Work and at Home: Comparative Perspectives’. Economie international, 99(2004), 49–80.Google Scholar

Franke, J. ‘Political Evolution of EMAS: Perspectives from the EU, National Governments and Industrial Groups’. European Environment, 5(6) (1995), 155–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankel, J. and NBOER. How Well Do Foreign Exchange Markets Function: Might a Tobin Tax Help? (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankenberg, G. ‘Stranger than Paradise: Identity and Politics in Comparative Law’. Utah Law Review, (1997), 259–74.

Fredman, S. and Spencer, S.. ‘Beyond Discrimination: It's Time for Enforceable Duties on Public Bodies to Promote Equality Outcomes’. European Human Rights Law Review, 6 (2006), 598–606.Google Scholar

Freedman, J. ‘Why Taxing the Micro-business Is Not Simple – A Cautionary Tale from the “Old World”’. Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association (2006) (at: http://search.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/JATTA/2006/5.html).

Freedman, J. ‘Interpreting Tax Statutes: Tax Avoidance and the Intention of Parliament’. Law Quarterly Review, 123 (2007), 53–90.Google Scholar

Fried, B.The Progressive Assault on Laissez Faire: Robert Hale and the First Law and Economics Movement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Friedman, L. ‘Is there a Modern Legal Culture?’ Ratio Juris, 7(2) (1994), 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friese, A., Link, S. P. and Mayer, S.. ‘Taxation and Corporate Governance’. SSRN (2006) (at: http://ssrn.com/paper=877900).

Fuchs, V. R. ‘Women's Quest for Economic Equality’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(1) (1989), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furubotn, E. G. and Richter, R.. Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics (Dearborn, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gammie, M. ‘Taxing Capital Gains –Thoughts from the UK’. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 23(2) (2000), 309.Google Scholar

Ganghof, S. ‘Globalization, Tax Reform Ideals and Social Policy Financing’. Global Social Policy, 5(1) (2005), 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, G. and Mitchell, D.. ‘Globalization, Government Spending and Taxation in the OECD’. European Journal of Political Research, 39(2) (2001), 145–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelardi, A. M. G. ‘The Influence of Tax Law Changes on the Timing of Marriages: A Two-country Analysis’. National Tax Journal, 49(1) (1996), 17–30.Google Scholar

Gemici, K. ‘Karl Polanyi and the Antinomies of Embeddedness’. Socio-Economic Review, 6 (2008), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, S. ‘Globalizing Rights?’, in Globalizing Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1999 (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Giddens, A. ‘Living in a Post-traditionalist Society’, in Beck, U (ed.), Reflexive Modernisation: Politics, Tradition, and Aesthetics in Modern Social Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Giddens, A. ‘Risk and Responsibility’. Modern Law Review, 62(1) (1999), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginn, J., Street, D. and Arber, S.. Women, Work, and Pensions (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Ginsburg, N.Divisions of Welfare: A Critical Introduction to Comparative Social Policy (London: Sage, 1992).Google Scholar

Glass, J. and Fujimoto, T.. ‘Housework, Paid Work, and Depression among Husbands and Wives’. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(2) (1994), 179–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Glennon, L. ‘Strategizing for the Future through the Civil Partnership Act’. Journal of Law and Society, 33(2) (2006), 244–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gornick, J. C. ‘Gender Equality in the Labour Market: Women's Employment and Earnings’. Gender and Welfare State Regimes, (1999) 210–42.CrossRef

Gottfried, H. ‘Beyond Patriarchy? Theorising Gender and Class’. Sociology, 32(03) (2000), 451–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graetz, M. J. ‘Implementing a Progressive Consumption Tax’. Harvard Law Review, 92(8) (1979), 1575–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grbich, J. ‘Taxation Narratives of Economic Gain: Reading Bodies Transgressively’. Feminist Legal Studies, 5 (1997) 131–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, D. and Griffith, M.. ‘Globalization and Its discontents’. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944--) (2002), 49–68.

Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C. R.. ‘Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing together the Old and the New Institutionalism’. Academy of Management Review, 21(4) (1996), 1022–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greer Litton, F. and Murry, V. M. ‘Gender and Families: Feminist Perspectives and Family Research’. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4) (2000), 1160–72.Google Scholar

Grofman, B. ‘Arend Lijphart and the New Institutionalism’, in Crepaz, Markus M. L, Koelble, Thomas A and Wilsford, David (eds.), Democracy and Institutions: The Life Work of Arend Lijphart (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Grofman, B. and Wittman, D.. The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism (New York, NY: Agathon Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Grosser, K. and Moon, J.. ‘Gender Mainstreaming and Corporate Social Responsibility: Reporting Workplace Issues’. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(4) (2005), 327–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Group, C. P. A.Welfare Benefits and Tax Credits Handbook, 9th edn (London: Child Poverty Action Group, 2007/2008).Google Scholar

Gunnarsson, Å., M. Davies and Svensson, E. M.. Exploiting the Limits of Law: Swedish Feminism and the Challenge to Pessimism (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar

Hakim, C. ‘Five Feminist Myths about Women's Employment’. British Journal of Sociology, 46(3) (1995), 429–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. R.. ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’. Political Studies, 44(5) (1996), 936–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. R.. ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, in Soltan, Karolet al. (eds.), Institutions and Social Order (Dearborn, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Harberger, A. ‘The Incidence of the Corporation Income Tax’. Journal of Political Economy, 70(3) (1962), 215–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harbury, C. D. and Hitchens, D.. ‘Women, Wealth and Inheritance’. Economic Journal, 87(345) (1977), 124–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, A. P. ‘Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory’. Stanford Law Review, 42(3) (1990), 581–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, P.Income Tax in Common Law Jurisdictions: From the Origins to 1820. (Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights (London: Harrison & Sons Ltd, 1948).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’. Harvard Law Review, 71 (1957), 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Hartmann, H. I. ‘The Family as the Locus of Gender, Class, and Political Struggle: The Example of Housework’. Signs, 6(3) (1981), 366–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haslanger, S. ‘Feminism in Metaphysics: Negotiating the Natural’, in Fricker, M and Hornsby, J (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Hasseldine, J. and Hite, P. A.. ‘Framing, Gender and Tax Compliance’. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4) (2003), 517–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hausman, J. and Ruud, P.. ‘Family Labor Supply with Taxes’. American Economic Review, 74(2) (1984), 242–8.Google Scholar

Hennessy, R.Materialist Feminism and the Politics of Discourse (New York, NY: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar

Hennessy, R. and Ingraham, C.. Materialist Feminism: A Reader in Class, Difference, and Women's Lives (London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar

Herz, M. ‘Judicial Textualism Meets Congressional Micromanagement: A Potential Collision in Clean Air Act Interpretation’. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 16 (1992), 175–82.Google Scholar

Hewitson, G. J.Feminist Economics: Interrogating the Masculinity of Rational Economic Man (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999).Google Scholar

Himmelweit, S. ‘The Experience of the UK Women's Budget Group’. Contribution to International Workshop on Gender Auditing of Government Budgets (2000) (at: www.e-quality.nl/assets/e-quality/publicaties/2004/presentatiesGBA/slides%20for%20FENN_Susan%20Himmelweit.pdf).

Himmelweit, S. ‘Making Visible the Hidden Economy: The Case for Gender-impact Analysis of Economic Policy’. Feminist Economics, 8(1) (2002), 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hira, A. and Hira, R.. ‘The New Institutionalism Contradictory Notions of Change’. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 59(2) (2000), 267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, P. M. ‘Sociology without Social Structure: Neoinstitutional Theory Meets Brave New World’. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6) (1997), 1702–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hochschild, A. and Machung, A.. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home (New York, NY: Viking, 1989).Google Scholar

Holcombe, R. G. ‘Tax Policy from Public Choice Perspective’. National Tax Journal, 51(2) (1999), 359–71.Google Scholar

Hollingsworth, J. R. and Boyer, R.. Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions (Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollingsworth, K., White, F. and Harden, I.. ‘Audit, Accountability and Independence: The Role of the Audit Commission’. Legal Studies, 18(1) (1998), 78–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hood, C. ‘Privatizing UK Tax Law Enforcement?’ Public Administration, 64(3) (1986), 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovenkamp, H. ‘First Great Law and Economics Movement’. Stanford Law Review, 42 (1990), 993–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphreys, S. C. ‘History, Economics, and Anthropology: The Work of Karl Polanyi’. History and Theory, 8(2) (1969), 165–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, J. C., DeLorme, C. D., Jr. and Hill, R. C.. ‘Taxation and the Wife's Use of Time’. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 34(3) (1981), 426–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurley, S. L. ‘The Unit of Taxation Under an Ideal Progressive Income Tax’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 4(2) (2002), 157–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurley, S. L. ‘Replies’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72(2) (2006), 447–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Infanti, A. C. ‘The Internal Revenue Code as Sodomy Statute’. Santa Clara Law Review, 44 (2004), 763–804.Google Scholar

Infanti, A. C. ‘A Tax Crit Identity Crisis? Or Tax Expenditure Analysis, Deconstruction, and the Rethinking of a Collective Identity’. Whittier Law Review, 26 (2005), 707–821.Google Scholar

Infanti, A. C. and Crawford, B. J.. Critical Tax Theory – An Introduction. (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Infanti, A. C. and Crawford, B.. ‘Critical Tax Theory: An Introduction’. University of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009–04690690 (2009) (at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1333799).

Jackson, S. ‘Why a Materialist Feminism Is (Still) Possible – and Necessary’. Women's Studies International Forum, 24(3–4) (2001), 283–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, S. and Wallschutzky, I.. ‘Tax Law Improvement In Australia and the UK: The Need for a Strategy for Simplification’. Fiscal Studies, 18(4) (1997), 445–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, R. ‘Law and the Leaky Woman: The Saloon, the Liquor Licence, and Narratives of Containment’. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 19(2) (2005), 181–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, C. C. ‘Split Income and Separate Spheres: Tax Law and Gender Roles in the 1940s’. Law and History Review, 6(2) (1988), 259–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, A. and Lenschow, A.. ‘“Greening” the European Union: What Can Be Learned from the “Leaders” of EU Environmental Policy?’ European Environment, 10(3) (2000), 109–20.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahn, V. ‘Rhetoric and the Law’. Diacritics, 19(2) (1989), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahne, H. and Kohen, A. I.. ‘Economic Perspectives on the Roles of Women in the American Economy’. Journal of Economic Literature, 13(4) (1975), 1249–92.Google Scholar

Kantowicz, E. R. ‘The Limits of Incrementalism: Carter's Efforts at Tax Reform’. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 4(2) (1985), 217–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplow, L. ‘How Tax Complexity and Enforcement Affect the Equity and Efficiency of the Income Tax’, in Slemrod, J (ed.), Tax Policy in the Real World (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S.. ‘Why the Legal System Is Less Efficient than the Income Tax in Redistributing Income’. Journal of Legal Studies, 23 (1994), 667–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karran, T. ‘The Determinants of Taxation in Britain: An Empirical Test’. Journal of Public Policy, 5(3) (1985), 365–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaye, T. A. ‘Sheltering Social Policy in The Tax Code: The Low-Income Housing Credit’. Villanova Law Review, 38 (1993), 871–931.Google Scholar

Kaye, T. A. ‘Show Me the Money: Congressional Limitations on State Tax Sovereignty’. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 35 (1998), 149–88.Google Scholar

Kendall, G. and Wickham, G.. Understanding Culture: Cultural Studies, Order, Ordering (London: Sage, 2001).Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. ‘New Approaches to Comparative Law: Comparativism and International Governance’. Utah Law Review, (1997), 545–637.

Kerridge, R. ‘Jones v. Garnett (Arctic Systems): Another Way of Getting to the Same Result’. British Tax Review, 5 (2007), 591–6.Google Scholar

Kershnar, S. ‘For discrimination against women’. Law and Philosophy, 26(6) (2007), 589–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingson, C. I. ‘The Coherence of International Taxation’. Columbia Law Review, (1981), 1151–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knauer, N. ‘Heteronormativity and Federal Tax Policy’. West Virginia Law Review, 101 (1998), 129–234.Google Scholar

Kordana, K. A. and Tabachnik, D. H.. ‘Tax and the Philosopher's Stone’. Virginia Law Review, 89(3) (2003), 647–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornhauser, M. E. ‘The Rhetoric of the Anti-Progressive Income Tax Movement: A Typical Male Reaction’. Michigan Law Review, 86(3) (1987), 465–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornhauser, M. E. ‘A Taxing Woman: The Relationship of Feminist Scholarship to Tax’. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, 6 (1996–7), 301–22.Google Scholar

Krause, K. ‘Tax Complexity: Problem or Opportunity?’ Public Finance Review, 28(5) (2000), 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kudrle, R. T. ‘The OECD's Harmful Tax Competition Initiative and the Tax Havens: From Bombshell to Damp Squib’. Global Economy Journal, 8(1) (2008), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumar, K. ‘Sociology and the Englishness of English Social Theory’. Sociological Theory, 19(1) (2001), 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahey, K. A.Are We ‘Persons’ Yet?: Law and Sexuality in Canada (University of Toronto Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahey, K. A.The Benefit/Penalty Unit in Income Tax Policy Diversity and Reform (Law Commission of Canada, 2000).Google Scholar

LaLumia, S. ‘The Effects of Joint Taxation of Married Couples on Labor Supply and Non-wage Income’. Journal of Public Economics, 92(7) (July 2008), 1698–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamanna, M.Emile Durkheim on the Family (London: Sage, 2002).Google Scholar

Land, H. ‘The Family Wage’, Feminist Review, 6 (1980), 55–77 (at: http://staging-www.palgrave-journals.com/fr/journal/v6/n1/pdf/fr198019a.pdf).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Land, H. ‘Spheres of Care in the UK: Separate and Unequal’. Critical Social Policy, 22(1) (2002), 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazar, L. ‘Finance Act 1965: The Capital Gains Tax’. Modern Law Review, 29(2) (1966), 181–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazar, L. ‘Finance Act 1965: The Corporation Tax’. Modern Law Review, 29(1) (1966), 50–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leadbetter, H. ‘Gender Budgeting’ (at: www.dfid.gov.uk/aboutdfid/organisation/pfma/pfma-gender-budget.pdf).

Lee, N. ‘The New Tax Credits’. Journal of Social Security Law, 10(1) (2003), 7–52.Google Scholar

Lee, N. ‘The Effect of the Human Rights Act 1998 on Taxation Policy and Administration’. eJournal of Tax Research, 2(2) (2004), 155–82.Google Scholar

Lee, O. ‘Social Theory Across Disciplinary Boundaries: Cultural Studies and Sociology’. Sociological Forum, 14(4) (1999), 547–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grand, J. ‘Implementing Stakeholder Grants: The British Case’, in Bruce Ackerman, et al. (eds.), Redesigning Distribution: Basic Income and Stakeholder Grants as Alternative Cornerstones for a More Egalitarian Capitalism (Making Social Policy Work: Essays in Honour of Howard Glennerster) (London: Verso, 2006) (at: www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/Redesigning%20Distribution%20v1.pdf#page=100).Google Scholar

Lewis, J. ‘Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes’. Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3) (1992), 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, J. ‘The “Problem” of Lone Motherhood in Comparative Perspective’, in Clasen, J. (ed.), Comparative Social Policy: Concepts, Theories, and Methods (London: Blackwell Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar

Lewis, J. ‘Gender and Welfare Regimes: Further Thoughts’. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 4(2) (2002), 160–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, J. ‘Gender and Welfare State Change’. European Societies, 4(4) (2002), 331–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lie, J. ‘Embedding Polanyi's Market Society’. Sociological Perspectives, 34(2) (1991), 219–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebert, U. ‘Europeanising Gender Mainstreaming: Constraints and Opportunities in the Multilevel Euro-polity’. Feminist Legal Studies, 10(3) (2002), 241–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lippe, T. Van, and Dijk, L.. ‘Comparative Research on Women's Employment’. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1) (2002), 221–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lister, R. ‘Future Insecure: Women and Income Maintenance under a Third Tory Term’. Feminist Review, (27) (1987), 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Littlewood, M. ‘Tax Competition: Harmful To Whom’. Michigan Journal of International Law, 26 (2004), 411–87.Google Scholar

Livingston, M. A. ‘Radical Scholars, Conservative Field: Putting Critical Tax Scholarship in Perspective’. North Carolina Law Review, 76 (1997), 1791.Google Scholar

Livingston, M. A. ‘Reinventing Tax Scholarship: Lawyers Economists and the Role of the Legal Academy’. Cornell Law Review, 83 (1997), 365.Google Scholar

Livingston, M. A. ‘Blum and Kalven at 50: Progressive Taxation, “Globalization”, and the New Millennium’. Florida Tax Review, 4 (2000), 731–68.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G.The Man of Reason: Male and Female in Western Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar

Lombardo, E. ‘Integrating or Setting the Agenda? Gender Mainstreaming in the European Constitution-Making Process’. Social Politics, 12(3) (2005), 412–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lopez, I. F. H. ‘Institutional Racism: Judicial Conduct and a New Theory of Racial Discrimination’. Yale Law Journal, 109(8) (2000), 1717–1884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LoPucki, L. ‘The Systems Approach to Law’. Cornell Law Review, 82 (1997), 479–521.Google Scholar

Loutzenheiser, G. ‘Jones v. Garnett: High Court Gives Taxpayer the Cold Shoulder’. British Tax Review, 4 (2005), 401–11.Google Scholar

Loutzenheiser, G. ‘Income Splitting and Settlements: Further Observations on Jones v. Garnett’. British Tax Review, 6 (2007), 693–716.Google Scholar

Lovenduski, J. ‘Women and Politics: Minority Representation or Critical Mass?’ Parliamentary Affairs, 54(4) (2001), 743–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucia, C. ‘Women on Trial: The Female Lawyer in the Hollywood Courtroom’, in Fineman, M. and McCluskey, M. T. (eds.), Feminism, Media, and the Law (Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Luenberger, D., G. Introduction to Dynamic Systems: Theory, Models, and Applications (New York, NY: Wiley, 1979).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. ‘Law as a Social System’. Northwestern University Law Review, 83 (1988), 136–50.Google Scholar

McBarnet, D. ‘After Enron Will “Whiter than White Collar Crime” Still Wash?’ British Journal of Criminology, 46(6) (2006), 1091–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McBarnet, D.Corporate Social Responsibility Beyond Law, Through Law, for Law. SSRN (2009) (at: http://ssrn.com/paper=1369305).Google Scholar

McBarnet, D. and Whelan, C.. ‘The Elusive Spirit of the Law: Formalism and the Struggle for Legal Control’. Modern Law Review, 54 (1991), 848–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCaffery, E. J. ‘Last Words (?): Towards a Feminization of Wealth’. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies (1996–7), 605–10.Google Scholar

McCaffery, E. J.Taxing Women (University of Chicago Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCaffery, E. J.Women and Taxes. NCPA Policy Report No. 250. (Dallas, TX: National Center for Policy Analysis, 2002) (at: www.ncpa.org/pub/st/st250/st250.pdf).

McCaffery, E. J. ‘Where's the Sex in Fiscal Sociology? Taxation and Gender in Comparative Perspective’. University of Southern California Law and Economics Working Paper Series (2008) (at: http://law.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1072&context=usclwps).

McCrudden, C. ‘Mainstreaming Equality in the Governance of Northern Ireland’. Fordham International Law Journal, 22 (1998), 1696–1775.Google Scholar

MacDonald, M. ‘Gender and Social Security Policy: Pitfalls and Possibilities’. Feminist Economics, 4(1) (1998), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGlynn, C. ‘Reclaiming a feminist vision: the reconciliation of paid work and family life in European Union law and policy’. Columbia Journal of European Law, 7 (2001), 241–72.Google Scholar

McGraw, L. A., Zvonkovic, A. M. and Walker, A. J.. ‘Studying Postmodern Families: A Feminist Analysis of Ethical Tensions in Work and Family Research’. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(1) (2000), 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntosh, M. ‘Feminism and Social Policy’, in Christopher, Pierson and Castles, Francis G. (eds.), The Welfare State Reader (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006).Google Scholar

MacKinnon, C. A. ‘Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory’. Signs, 7(3) (1982), 515–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P.. ‘The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life’. American Political Science Review, 78(3) (1984), 734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolis, J. D. and Walsh, J. P.. ‘Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2) (2003), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MarksRubin, M Rubin, M. and Bartle, J. R. ‘Integrating Gender into Government Budgets: A New Perspective’. Public Administration Review, 65(3) (2005), 259–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marsh, D. B. ‘The Taxation of Imputed Income’. Political Science Quarterly, 58(4) (1943), 514–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mason, R. and Calvin, L. D.. ‘A Study of Admitted Income Tax Evasion’. Law and Society Review, 13(1) (1978), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattei, U. ‘Some Realism About Comparativism: Comparative Law Teaching in the Hegemonic Jurisdiction’. American Journal of Comparative Law, 50 (2002), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayntz, R. Mayntz, ‘New Challenges to Governance Theory’, in Bang, Henrik Paul (ed.), Governance as Social and Political Communication (Manchester University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Mazey, S. ‘The European Union and Women's Rights’, in Hine, D and Kassim, H. (eds.), Beyond the Market: The EU and National Social Policy (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar

Meehan, E. and Collins, E. ‘Women, the European Union and Britain’. Parliamentary Affairs, 49(1) (2001), 221–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menell, P. and Stewart, R.. Environmental Law and Policy (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1994).Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. ‘Exploring a Research Agenda of the Feminization of the Legal Profession: Theories of Gender and Social Change’. Law and Social Inquiry, 14(2) (1989), 289–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merton, R. ‘In Honor of Nobel Laureate, Franco Modigliani’. Journal of Economic Perspectives (1987), 145–55.

Mieszkowski, P. ‘Tax Incidence Theory: The Effects of Taxes on the Distribution of Income’. Journal of Economic Literature (1969), 1103–24.

Millar, J. ‘From Wage Replacement to Wage Supplementation: Benefits and Tax Credits’, in Millar, J. (ed.), Understanding Social Security (Bristol: Policy Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Mintz, J. ‘The Corporation Tax: A Survey’. Fiscal Studies, 16(4) (1995), 23–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monroe, H.Intolerable Inquisition?: Reflections on the Law of Tax (London: Stevens, published under the auspices of Hamlyn Trust, 1981).Google Scholar

Montanari, I. ‘From Family Wage to Marriage Subsidy and Child Benefits: Controversy and Consensus in the Development of Family Support’. Journal of European Social Policy, 10(4) (2000), 307–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moran, B. ‘Setting an Agenda for the Study of Tax and Black Culture’. University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 21 (1999), 779–94.Google Scholar

Morck, R. ‘Why Some Double Taxation Might Make Sense: The Special Case of Inter-corporate Dividends’. NBER Working Paper (2003).

Morck, R. ‘How to Eliminate Pyramidal Business Groups – The Double Taxation of Inter-corporate Dividends and Other Incisive Uses of Tax Policy’. NBER Working Paper (2004).

Morgan, K. J. ‘The Politics of Mothers’ Employment: France in Comparative Perspective'. World Politics, 55(2) (2003), 259–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mumford, A. ‘Marketing Working Mothers: Contextualizing Earned Income Tax Credits within Feminist Cultural Theory’. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 23(4) (2001), 411–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mumford, A. ‘Inheritance in Socio-political Context: The Case for Reviving the Sociological Discourse of Inheritance Tax Law’. Journal of Law and Society, 34(4) (2007), 567–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mumford, A. ‘Towards a Fiscal Sociology of Tax Credits and the Fathers’ Rights Movement', Social and Legal Studies, 17(2) (2008), 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, L. and Nagel, T.. The Myth of Ownership (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Musgrave, R. ‘Theories of Fiscal Crises: An Essay in Fiscal Sociology’, in Aaron, H. J and Boskins, M. J (eds.), The Economics of Taxation (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1980), pp. 316–90.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. ‘Rawls on Justice’. Philosophical Review (1973), 220–34.

Naumann, I. K. ‘Childcare and Feminism in West Germany and Sweden in the 1960s and 1970s’. Journal of European Social Policy, 15(1) (2005), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nee, V. ‘Sources of the New Institutionalism’, in Brinton, M. C. and Nee, V. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Sociology (New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 1998).Google Scholar

Neff, D. K. ‘Married Women's Labor Supply and the Marriage Penalty’. Public Finance Review, 18(4) (1990), 420–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelken, D. ‘Disclosing/Invoking Legal Culture: An Introduction’. Social and Legal Studies, 4(4) (1995), 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelken, D. ‘Comparing Legal Cultures’, in Sarat, A (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004).Google Scholar

Nelson, J. A. ‘Tax Reform and Feminist Theory in the United States: Incorporating Human Connection’. Journal of Economic Studies, 18(5–6) (1991), 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, J. A.Feminism, Objectivity, and Economics (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

Newth, J. T. ‘Divorce and Separation’. Simon's Tax Briefing (12 June 2006), 5–6.Google Scholar

Ngugi, J. M. ‘Forgetting Lochner in the Journey from Plan to Market: The Framing Effect of the Market Rhetoric in Market-oriented Reforms’, Buffalo Law Review, 56 (2008), 1–97.Google Scholar

Nicholson, L. ‘Feminism and Marx: Integrating Kinship with the Economic’. Praxis International, 4 (1985), 367–80 (at: www.ceeol.com).Google Scholar

Nolan, B. and Smeeding, T. M.. ‘Ireland's Income Distribution in Comparative Perspective’. Paper Prepared for the 28th General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth. Cork, Ireland: Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University (2004) (at: www.iariw.org/papers/2004/smeeding.pdf).

,Note. ‘Income Tax Liability of Married Women’. Modern Law Review, 10(2) (1947), 198–203.Google Scholar

,Note. ‘California Prohibits Gender-based Pricing’. Harvard Law Review, 109(7) (1996), 1839–44.Google Scholar

O'Connor, J. S., Orloff, A. S. and Shaver, S.. States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States (Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

OECD. ‘Evaluation of DFID's Policy and Practice in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment’, August 2006 (at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/52/38/37390142.pdf).

OECD. ‘European Community (2007), DAC Peer Review: Main Findings and Recommendations’, 2007) (at: www.oecd.org/document/0/0,3343,en_2649_34603_38897408_1_1_1_1,00.html).

Okin, S. ‘Justice and Gender: An Unfinished Debate’. Fordham Law Review, 72 (2003), 1537–67.Google Scholar

Oldman, O. and Temple, R. ‘Comparative Analysis of the Taxation of Married Persons’. Stanford Law Review, 12(3) (1960), 585–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Riordan, T. and Jordan, A.. ‘Institutions, Climate Change and Cultural Theory: Towards a Common Analytical Framework’. Global Environmental Change, 9(2) (1999), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orloff, A. ‘Gender in the Welfare State’. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1) (1996), 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orviska, M. and Hudson, J.. ‘Tax Evasion, Civic Duty and the Law Abiding Citizen’. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(1) (2003), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahl, J. ‘Personal Taxation, Social Security and Financial Arrangements within Marriage’. Journal of Law and Society, 13(2) (1986), 241–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pascall, G.Social Policy: A Feminist Analysis (London: Tavistock Publications, 1986).Google Scholar

Pearson, R. ‘Feminist Responses to Economic Globalisation: Some Examples of Past and Future Practice’. Gender and Development, 11(1) (2003), 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pemberton, H. ‘Taxation and Labour's Modernisation Programme’. Contemporary British History, 20(3) (2006), 423–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, B. G.Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’ (London: Continuum, 2005).Google Scholar

Pettit, B. and Hook, J.. ‘The Structure of Women's Employment in Comparative Perspective’. Social Forces, 84(2) (2005), 779–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Philipps, L. ‘Taxing the Market Citizen: Fiscal Policy and Inequality in an Age of Privatization’. Law and Contemporary Problems, 63(4) (2000), 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Philipps, L. ‘Tax Law and Social Reproduction: The Gender of Fiscal Policy in an Age of Privatization’, in Cossman, Brenda and Fudge, Judy (eds.), Privatization, Law, and the Challenge to Feminism (University of Toronto Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Philipps, L. and Condon, M.. ‘Transnational Market Governance and Economic Citizenship: New Frontiers for Feminist Legal Theory’. Thomas Jefferson Law Review 28 (2005), 105–50.Google Scholar

Phillips, M. ‘Reappraising the Real Entity Theory of the Corporation’. Florida State University Law Review, 21 (1994), 1061–1123.Google Scholar

Picciotto, S.International Business Taxation (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1992).Google Scholar

Picciotto, S. ‘Constructing Compliance: Game Playing, Tax Law, and the Regulatory State’. Law and Policy, 29(1) (2007), 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, P. ‘The New Politics of the Welfare State’. World Politics, 48 (1996), 143–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigou, A. ‘The Report of the Royal Commission on the British Income Tax’. Quarterly Journal of Economics (1920), 607–25.

Plantenga, J. and Hansen, J.. ‘Assessing Equal Opportunities in the European Union’. International Labour Review, 138(4) (1999), 351–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, K.The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. (London: Beacon Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Polanyi, K. and Pearson, H. W.. The Livelihood of Man (New York, NY: Academic Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Polikoff, N. D. ‘Ending Marriage as We Know It’. Hofstra Law Review, 32(1) (2003), 201–32.Google Scholar

Pollack, M. A. ‘The New Institutionalism and EC Governance: The Promise and Limits of Institutional Analysis’. Governance, 9(4) (1996), 429–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollack, S. D. ‘Tax Complexity, Reform, and the Illusions of Tax Simplification’. George Mason Independent Law Review, 2 (1994), 319–58.Google Scholar

Power, M. ‘Auditing and Environmental Expertise: Between Protest and Professionalisation’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 4(3) (1991), 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Power, M.The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Pudrovska, T. and Ferree, M. M.. ‘Global Activism in “Virtual Space”: The European Women's Lobby in the Network of Transnational Women's NGOs on the Web’. Social Politics, 11(1) (2004), 117–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radaelli, C. ‘Harmful Tax Competition in the EU: Policy Narratives and Advocacy Coalitions’. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(4) (1999), 661–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raes, F. ‘What Can We Expect from Gender Sensitive Budgets? Strategies in Brazil and in Chile in a Comparative Perspective’. Network Women in Development Europe (WIDE) (2006) (at: www.eurosur.org/wide/home.htm).

Rai, S.Mainstreaming Gender, Democratizing The State?: Institutional Mechanisms for the Advancement of Women (Manchester University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rake, K. ‘Gender Budgets. The Experience of the UK's Women's Budget Group’, in paper prepared for conference Gender Balance – Equal Finance (2002).

Rawlings, G. ‘Taxes and Transnational Treaties: Responsive Regulation and the Reassertion of Offshore Sovereignty’. Law and Policy, 29(1) (2007), 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J.A Theory of Justice (orig. pub. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971) (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Redston, A. ‘Small Business in the Eye of the Storm’. British Tax Review, 5 (2004), 566–81.Google Scholar

Redston, A. ‘Income Sharing: The Nelsonian Option’. British Tax Review, 6 (2007), 680–6.Google Scholar

Reece, H. ‘The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, 20(1) (2008), 109–10.Google Scholar

Rees, T. ‘Reflections on the Uneven Development of Gender Mainstreaming in Europe’. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7(4) (2005), 555–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rice, R. S. ‘Tax Reform and Tax Incentives’. Law and Contemporary Problems, 34(4) (1969), 782–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riley, N. E. ‘Challenging Demography: Contributions from Feminist Theory’. Sociological Forum, 14(3) (1999), 369–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ring, D. M. ‘One Nation among Many: Policy Implications of Cross-border Tax Arbitrage’. Boston College Law Review, 44 (2002), 79–175.Google Scholar

Rittich, K. ‘Feminization and Contingency: Regulating the Stakes of Work for Women’, in Conaghan, J, Fischl, R. M and Klare, K (eds.), Labour Law in an Era of Globalization: Transformative Practices and Possibilities (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Roberts, R. ‘Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory’. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6) (1992), 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, N. ‘Beyond the Public/Private Division: Law, Power and the Family’. Journal of Law and Society (1987), 61–76.

Rosenfeld, R. A. and Birkelund, G. E.. ‘Women's Part-time Work: A Cross-national Comparison’. European Sociological Review, 11(2) (2002), 111–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubery, J. ‘Gender Mainstreaming and Gender Equality in the EU: The Impact of the EU Employment Strategy’. Industrial Relations Journal, 33(5) (2002), 500–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubery, J., Grimshaw, D., Fagan, C., Figueiredo, H. and Smith, M.. ‘Gender Equality Still on the European Agenda – But for How Long?’ Industrial Relations Journal, 34(5) (2003), 477–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudd, J. ‘Ruhl's, J. B.Law-and-Society System: Burying Norms and Democracy under Complexity Theory's Foundation’. William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 29 (2004), 551–632.Google Scholar

Ruhl, J. B. ‘Complexity Theory as a Paradigm for the Dynamical Law-and-Society System: A Wake-Up Call for Legal Reductionism and the Modern Administrative State’. Duke Law Journal, 45 (1996), 849–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruhl, J. B. ‘Fitness of Law: Using Complexity Theory to Describe the Evolution of Law and Society and Its Practical Meaning for Democracy’. Vanderbilt Law Review, 49 (1996), 1406.Google Scholar

Ruhl, J. B. ‘Thinking of Environmental Law as a Complex Adaptive System: How to Clean Up the Environment by Making a Mess of Environmental Law’. Houston Law Review, 34 (1997), 933–1002.Google Scholar

Ruhl, J. B. ‘Law's Complexity: A Primer’. Georgia State University Law Review, 24 (2008), 885–911.Google Scholar

Ruhl, J. B. and Ruhl, H. J., ‘The Arrow of the Law in Modern Administrative States: Using Complexity Theory to Reveal the Diminishing Returns and Increasing Risks the Burgeoning of Law Poses to Society’, UC Davis Law Review, 30 (1997), 405–82.Google Scholar

Ruhl, J. B. and Salzman, J., ‘Mozart and the Red Queen: The Problem of Regulatory Accretion in the Administrative State’, Georgetown Law Journal, 91 (2002), 757–850.Google Scholar

Runyan, S. ‘Women in the Neoliberal Frame’, in Meyer, Mary K and Prügl, Elisabeth (eds.), Gender Politics in Global Governance (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999).Google Scholar

Sainsbury, D.Gender and Welfare State Regimes (Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salinas, J. G. ‘The OECD Tax Competition Initiative: A Critique of Its Merits in the Global Marketplace’. Houston Journal of International Law, 25(3) (2003), 531–61.Google Scholar

Sanders, R.The Future of Financial Services in the Caribbean. International Tax Competition: Globalisation and Fiscal Sovereignty, London: Commonwealth Secretariat, (2002) (at: www.itio.org/documents/Speech-RonaldSanders.pdf).

Sanrichio, C. W. ‘Progressivity and Potential Income: Measuring the Effect of Changing Work Patterns on Income Tax Progressivity’. Columbia Law Review, 108 (2008), 1151–1609.Google Scholar

Sargent, L.Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism (London: South End Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Savage, J. D.Making the EMU: The Politics of Budgetary Surveillance and the Enforcement of Maastricht (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Sawer, M. ‘Women's Ministries: An Australian Perspective’. Feminist Review, (63) (1999), 91–4.Google Scholar

Schauer, F.Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-based Decision-making in Law and in Life (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Scholz, J. K. ‘The Earned Income Tax Credit: Participation, Compliance, and Antipoverty’. National Tax Journal, 47(1) (1994), 63–87.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. A. ‘English Economists and the State-managed Economy’. Journal of Political Economy, 57(5) (1949), 371–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schumpeter, J. A. ‘The March Into Socialism’. American Economic Review, 40(2) (1950), 446–56.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. A.Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. and Scott, R. E.. ‘Contract Theory and the Limits of Contract Law’. Yale Law Journal, 113 (2003), 541–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, T. P. ‘Durkheim's Prediction about the Declining Importance of the Family and Inheritance: Evidence from the Wills of Providence, 1775–1985’, Sociological Quarterly (1996), 503–19.

Seligman, E. R. A. ‘The Theory of Progressive Taxation’. Publications of the American Economic Association, 8(1) (1893), 52–5.Google Scholar

Seligman, E. R. A. ‘The Income Tax’. Political Science Quarterly, 9(4) (1894), 610–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Servet, J.-M. ‘L'institution monétaire de la société selon Karl Polanyi’. Revue économique, 44(6) (1993), 1127–49.Google Scholar

Sharman, J. C. ‘Norms, Coercion and Contracting in the Struggle against “Harmful” Tax Competition’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 60 (2006), 143–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharp, R. ‘Budgeting for Equality: The Australian Experience’. Feminist Economics, 8(1) (2002), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, J. ‘Process and Constitutional Discourse in the European Union’. Journal of Law and Society, 27(1) (2000), 4–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, J. ‘The European Union and Gender Mainstreaming: Constitutionally Embedded or Comprehensively Marginalised?’ Feminist Legal Studies, 10(3–4) (2002), 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shurtz, N. E. ‘A Critical View of Traditional Tax Policy Theory: A Pragmatic Alternative’. Villanova Law Review, 31 (1986), 1665–1701.Google Scholar

Silver, B. A. ‘Modernizing the Revenue Rule: The Enforcement of Foreign Tax Judgments’. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 22 (1992), 609–33.Google Scholar

Simester, A. P. and Chan, W.. ‘On Tax and Justice’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23(4) (2003), 711–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, J. B. ‘The Governance of the European Union: A New Institutionalist Approach’. Journal of Public Policy, 13(4) (1993), 351–80.Google Scholar

Slemrod, J. ‘Which is the Simplest Tax System of Them All’, in Aaron, H. J and Gale, W. G. (eds.), Economic Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Smeeding, T. M. ‘Poor People in Rich Nations: The United States in Comparative Perspective’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1) (2006), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, D. K. ‘Superannuating the Second Sex: Law, Privatisation and Retirement Income’. Modern Law Review, 64(4) (2001), 519–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sperber, I. ‘Sperber's Fashions in Science’. Social Epistemology, 6(1) (1992), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Squires, J. ‘Equality and diversity: a new equality framework for Britain?’ Unpublished paper presented at School of Public Policy, University College, London University, December (2003) (at: www.bath.ac.uk/esml/Library/pdf-files/squires.pdf).

Squires, J. and Wickham-Jones, M.. ‘New Labour, Gender Mainstreaming and the Women and Equality Unit’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(1) (2004), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staudt, N. C. ‘Taxing Housework’. Georgetown Law Journal, 84 (1995), 1571–1645.Google Scholar

Staudt, N. C. ‘The Political Economy of Taxation: A Critical Review of a Classic’. Law and Society Review, 30(3) (1996), 651–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staveley, B. ‘The Quest for the Allowable Loss: Reflections on Lord Hoffmann's Approach to Ramsay’. British Tax Review, 6 (2005), 609–19.Google Scholar

Steinmo, S. ‘Political institutions and tax policy in the United States, Sweden, and Britain’. World Politics: A Quarterly Journal of International Relations, 41(4) (1989), 500–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinmo, S. ‘Globalization and Taxation: Challenges to the Swedish Welfare State’. Comparative Political Studies, 35(7) (2002), 839–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinmo, S. ‘The Evolution of Policy Ideas: Tax Policy in the 20th Century’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(2) (2003), 206–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. and Longstreth, F.. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinmo, S. and Tolbert, C. J.. ‘Do Institutions Really Matter?’ Comparative Political Studies, 31(2) (1998), 165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiglitz, J. E. ‘The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4) (2000), 1441–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stotsky, J. G. ‘How Tax Systems Treat Men and Women Differently’. Finance and Development (1997) (at: www.worldbank.org/fandd/english/pdfs/0397/070397.pdf).

Stretton, T.Women Waging Law in Elizabethan England (Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stychin, C. ‘Not (Quite) a Horse and Carriage: The Civil Partnership Act 2004’, Feminist Legal Studies, 14 (2006), 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suchman, M. C. and Edelman, L. B.. ‘Legal Rational Myths: The New Institutionalism and the Law and Society Tradition’. Law and Social Inquiry, 21 (1996), 903–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sundstrom, M. ‘The Growth in Full-time Work among Swedish Women in the 1980s’. Acta Sociologica, 36(2) (1993), 139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swanson, D. L. ‘Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model’. Academy of Management Review, 20(1) (1995), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, V. and Rupp, L.. ‘Women's Culture and Lesbian Feminist Activism: A Reconsideration of Cultural Feminism’. Signs, 19(1) (1993), 32–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, G. ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’. Law and Society Review, 17(2) (1983), 239–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, K. ‘Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1) (1999), 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, L. and Walker, A.. ‘Gender in Families: Women and Men in Marriage, Work, and Parenthood’. Journal of Marriage and the Family (1989), 845–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thuronyi, V. ‘International Tax Cooperation and a Multilateral Treaty’. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 26 (2001), 1641–81.Google Scholar

Tiley, J. ‘Aspects of Schedule A’, in Tiley, J (ed.), Studies in the History of Tax Law, vol. 1 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), pp. 81–100.Google Scholar

Tolbert, P. S. and Zucker, L. G. ‘The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory’, in Clegg, S. R and Hardy, C (eds.), Studying Organization: Theory and Method, London: Sage, 1999.Google Scholar

Townsend, Jr., A. ‘Global Schoolyard Bully: The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development's Coercive Efforts to Control Tax Competition’. Fordham International Law Journal, 25 (2001), 215–58.Google Scholar

Trifiletti, R. ‘Southern European Welfare Regimes and the Worsening Position of Women’. Journal of European Social Policy, 9(1) (1999), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

True, J. ‘Mainstreaming Gender in Global Public Policy’. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 5(3) (2003), 368–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

True, J. and Mintrom, M.. ‘Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming’. International Studies Quarterly, 45(1) (2001), 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urry, J. ‘The Complexity Turn’. Theory, Culture and Society, 22(5) (2005), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uy, M. ‘Tax and Race: The Impact on Asian Americans’. Asian American Law Journal, 11 (2004), 7–143.Google Scholar

Valentine, S. and Fleischman, G.. ‘Ethical Reasoning in an Equitable Relief Innocent Spouse Context’. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4) (2003), 325–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vallentyne, P. ‘Hurley on Justice and Responsibility’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72(2) (2006), 433–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ventry, D. J., Jr. ‘Saving Seaborn: Ownership as the Basis of Family Taxation’. (2009), SSRN eLibrary.

Verbeke, A. and Coeck, C.. ‘Environmental Taxation: A Green Stick or a Green Carrot for Corporate Social Performance?’ Managerial and Decision Economics, 18(6) (1997), 507–16.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Villagomez, E. ‘Gender Responsive Budgets: Issues, Good Practices and Policy Options’, at the conference Regional Symposium on Mainstreaming Gender into Economic Policies (NNUU Comisión Económica para Europa, 2004) (at: www.infopolis.es/web/GenderBudgets/pdf/Gender_budgets_draft.pdf).

Vogel, J. ‘European Welfare Regimes and the Transition to Adulthood: A Comparative and Longitudinal Perspective’. Social Indicators Research, 59(3) (2002), 275–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogel, L.Woman Questions: Essays for a Materialist Feminism (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar

Waite, L. ‘Does Marriage Matter?’ Demography (1995), 483–507.

Walby, S. ‘Gender Mainstreaming: Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice’. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 12(3) (2005), 321–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warskett, G., Winer, S. and Hettich, W.. ‘The Complexity of Tax Structure in Competitive Political Systems’. International Tax and Public Finance, 5(2) (1998), 123–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wartick, S. L. and Cochran, P. L.. ‘The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model’. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4) (1985), 758–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, S.Playing the State: Australian Feminist Interventions (Melbourne: Verso, 1990).Google Scholar

Wax, A. L. ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Market: Is There a Future for Egalitarian Marriage?’ Virginia Law Review, 84(4) (1998), 509–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webb, M. ‘Defining the Boundaries of Legitimate State Practice: Norms, Transnational Actors and the OECD's Project on Harmful Tax Competition 1’. Review of International Political Economy, 11(4) (2004), 787–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weedon, C.Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory (London: Blackwell, 1997).Google Scholar

Weisbach, D. A. ‘Formalism in the Tax Law’. University of Chicago Law Review, 66 (1999), 860–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weisbach, D. A. and Nussim, J.. ‘The Integration of Tax and Spending Programs’. Yale Law Journal, 113(5) (2004), 955–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, E. G. ‘Adam Smith's Public Economics: A Re-Evaluation’. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 10(1) (1977), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whalen, C. J., Schumpeter, K. P., Kapp, K. W., Williamson, O. E. and North, D. C.. ‘Post-Keynesian Institutionalism and the Anxious Society: Assessing the Evolution and Impact of Alternative Institutional Structures’, in Batie, Sandra S and Mercuro, Nicholas (eds.), Alternative Economic Structures: Evolution and Impact (London: Routledge, 2008), pp. 273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheelock, J., Oughton, E. and Baines, S.. (2003) ‘Getting by with a Little Help from Your Family: Toward a Policy-relevant Model of the Household’. Feminist Economics, 9(1), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittington, L. ‘Taxes and the Family: The Impact of the Tax Exemption for Dependents on Marital Fertility’. Demography (1992), 215–26.

Wikeley, N. ‘Child Trust Funds: Asset-based Welfare or a Recipe for Increased Inequality?’ Journal of Social Security Law, 11(4) (2004) (at: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/27919/).Google Scholar

Wikeley, N. ‘Child Support, Dividend Income and the Bertie Wooster Escape Clause’. Family Law, 9 (2005), 707–11.Google Scholar

Wikeley, N. ‘Child Support Reform – Throwing the Baby out with the Bathwater?’ Child and Family Law Quarterly, 19(4) (2007), 434.Google Scholar

Wikeley, N. and Young, L.. ‘Smith v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Child Support, the Self-Employed and the Meaning of “Total Taxable Profits” – Total Confusion Reigns’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, 17 (2005), 267–92.Google Scholar

Williams, D. F. ‘Tax and Corporate Social Responsibility’. Tax Journal, 913 (10 December 2007), 10.Google Scholar

Williamson, R. ‘Private Lives’. Tax Journal, 791 (2005), 17–18.Google Scholar

Williamson, R. ‘Winners and Losers among Low-income Taxpayers’. Tax Journal, (879) (2007), 19–20.Google Scholar

,Women, DFTAO and UN. ‘Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action’. United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (1995).

Woodman, F. ‘The Charter and the Taxation of Women’. Ottawa Law Review, 22 (1990), 625–90.Google Scholar

Yngvesson, B. ‘Inventing Law in Local Settings: Rethinking Popular Legal Culture’. Yale Law Journal, 98 (1988), 1689–1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, C. F. L. ‘(In) Visible Inequalities: Women, Tax and Poverty’. Ottawa Law Review, 27 (1995), 99–128.Google Scholar

Young, C. F. L.Women, Tax and Social Programs: The Gendered Impact of Funding Social Programs through the Tax System. Status of Women Canada (2000).Google Scholar

Zelenak, L. ‘Feminism and Safe Subjects Like the Tax Code’. California Review of Law and Women's Studies, 6 (1996–7), 323–7.Google Scholar

Zey, M. and Swenson, T.. ‘Corporate Tax Laws, Corporate Restructuring, and Subsidiarization of Corporate Form, 1981–1995’. Sociological Quarterly, 39(4) (1998), 555–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar