Book contents
- The Sublime in Antiquity
- The Sublime in Antiquity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Book part
- Glossary
- Note on translations
- Preface
- Chapter 1 Introduction: the sublime before and after Longinus
- Chapter 2 The art and rhetoric of the Longinian sublime
- Chapter 3 The sublime before Longinus in rhetoric and criticism: Caecilius to Demetrius
- Chapter 4 The sublime before Longinus in rhetoric and literature: Theophrastus to Homer
- Chapter 5 The material sublime
- Chapter 6 The immaterial sublime
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index locorum
- General index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2016
Book contents
- The Sublime in Antiquity
- The Sublime in Antiquity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Book part
- Glossary
- Note on translations
- Preface
- Chapter 1 Introduction: the sublime before and after Longinus
- Chapter 2 The art and rhetoric of the Longinian sublime
- Chapter 3 The sublime before Longinus in rhetoric and criticism: Caecilius to Demetrius
- Chapter 4 The sublime before Longinus in rhetoric and literature: Theophrastus to Homer
- Chapter 5 The material sublime
- Chapter 6 The immaterial sublime
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index locorum
- General index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Sublime in Antiquity , pp. 623 - 657Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Abrams, M. H. (1953) The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. New York.Google Scholar
Abry, J.-H. (1993) “Le Nil: Réflexions sur les vers iii.271–274 des Astronomiques,” in Manilio fra poesia e scienza: Atti del convegno, Lecce, 14–16 maggio 1992, ed. Liuzzi, D.. Galatina. 195–210.Google Scholar
Abry, J.-H.(1999) “Présence de Lucrèce: Les Astronomiques de Manilius,” in Présence de Lucrèce: Actes du colloque tenu à Tours (3–5 décembre 1998), ed. Poignault, R.. Tours. 3–28.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. (2002) Polyeideia: The Iambi of Callimachus and the Archaic Iambic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (1984) “The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 105, no. 2: 174–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K. (1999) “The Beginnings of Cosmology,” in The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A.. Cambridge. 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K. (2000) “The Treatise of Cleomedes and its Critique of Epicurean Cosmology,” in Epikureismus in der späten Republik und der Kaiserzeit: Akten der 2. Tagung der Karl-und-Gertrud-Abel-Stiftung vom 30. September–3. Oktober 1998 in Würzburg, ed. Erler, M. and Bees, R.. Stuttgart. 164–89.Google Scholar
Allen, W. Jr. (1941) “The Terentianus of Περὶ ὕψους,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 62, no. 1: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusser, L. (1971) Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays. Trans. Brewster, B. R.. London.Google Scholar
Ansell-Pearson, K., and Large, D. (eds.) (2006) The Nietzsche Reader. Malden, MA and Oxford.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. Barnes, J.. Princeton.Google Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1989) Sapientiae facies: Étude sur les images de Sénèque. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1990) “Pline le Jeune et le sublime,” Révue des Études Latines vol. 68: 88–98.Google Scholar
Ashfield, A., and de Bolla, P. (eds.) (1996) The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asper, M. (1997) Onomata Allotria: Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. ([1946] 1953) “Odysseus’ Scar,” in Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, Trans. Trask, W. R.. Princeton. 3–23.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (1958) Literatursprache und Publikum in der lateinischen Spätantike und im Mittelalter. Bern.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (1965) Literary Language and its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Trans. Manheim, R.. New York (German original edition: 1958).Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (1967 [1950]) “Ernst Robert Curtius: Europäische Literatur und Lateinisches Mittelalter (1948),” in Auerbach, , Gesammelte Aufsätze zur romanischen Philologie. Bern and Munich. 330–8.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (1993) Literary Language and Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Trans. Manheim, Ralph with a new Foreword by Ziolkowski, Jan. Princeton (German original edition: 1958).Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (2003) Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. Trask, W. R.. Princeton. (First published 1953.)Google Scholar
Augello, I. (ed.) (2006) Cecilio di Calatte: Frammenti di critica letteraria, retorica e storiografia. Rome.Google Scholar
Bachmann, W. G. (1902–4) Die ästhetischen Anschauungen Aristarchs in der Exegese und Kritik der homerischen Gedichte. 2 vols. Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Baker, E. (2007) “Lucretius in the European Enlightenment,” in The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, ed. Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P.. Cambridge. 274–88.Google Scholar
Bakola, E. (2014) “Interiority, the ‘Deep Earth’ and the Spatial Symbolism of Darius’ Apparition in the Persians of Aechylus,” The Cambridge Classical Journal vol. 60: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakola, E., Prauscello, L., and Telò, M. (2013) Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzac, J.-L. G. de (1665) Les oeuvres de monsieur de Balzac divisées en deux tomes. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Barber, C., and Papaioannou, S. (eds.) (forthcoming) Michael Psellos on Literature and Art. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Barker, A. (1987) “Text and Sense at Philebus 56a,” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 37, no. 1: 103–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (1977) “De mundo.” Review of G. Reale, Aristotele: Trattato sul cosmo per Alessandro. Traduzione con testo greco a fronte, introduzione, commento e indici. (Naples, 1974). Classical Review 27, no. 1: 40–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (1989) “The Size of the Sun in Antiquity,” Acta Classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis vol. 15: 29–41.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1977) “Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives,” in Barthes, , Image, Music, Text. ed. Heath, S.. Trans. Heath, S.. New York. 79–124.Google Scholar
Barwick, K. (1967) “Die “Rhetorik ad Alexandrum” und Anaximenes, Alkidamas, Isokrates, Aristoteles und die Theodekteia (Fortsetzung),” Philologus vol. 3, no. 1/2: 47–55.Google Scholar
Baxandall, M. (1971) Giotto and the Orators: Humanist Observers of Painting in Italy and the Discovery of Pictorial Composition, 1350–1450. Oxford.Google Scholar
Baxandall, M. (1988) Painting and Experience in Fifteenth-Century Italy: A Primer in the Social History of Pictorial Style. 2nd edn. Oxford. (1st edn. 1972.)Google Scholar
Bernadette, S. (trans.) (1991) “Aeschylus, The Suppliant Maidens,” in Aeschylus ii: The Suppliant Maidens, The Persians, Seven Against Thebes, Prometheus Bound, ed. Grene, D. and Lattimore, R.. 2nd edn. Chicago.Google Scholar
Biles, Z. P. (2002) “Intertextual Biography in the Rivalry of Cratinus and Aristophanes,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 123, no. 2: 169–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, J. (2014) Genealogy of the Tragic: Greek Tragedy and German Philosophy. Princeton.Google Scholar
Binski, P. (2010) “Reflection on ‘The Wonderful Height and Size’ of Gothic Great Churches and the Medieval Sublime,” in Magnificence and the Sublime in Medieval Aesthetics: Art, Architecture, Literature, Music, ed. Jaeger, C. S.. New York. 130–56.Google Scholar
Blank, D. (1995) “Philodemus and the Technicity of Rhetoric,” in Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, ed. Obbink, D.. New York. 178–88.Google Scholar
Blass, F. (1865) Die griechische Beredsamkeit in dem Zeitraum von Alexander bis auf Augustus. Ein litterarhistorischer Versuch. Berlin.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (1979) Schiffbruch mit Zuschauer: Paradigma einer Daseinsmetapher. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (1988) Die Legitimität der Neuzeit, 2nd, rev. edn. Frankfurt am Main. (1st edn. 1966)Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. (1984) Descent from Heaven: Images of Dew in Greek Poetry and Religion. Chico, CA.Google Scholar
Boehm, I., and Hübner, W. (eds.) (2011) La poésie astrologique dans l'Antiquité: Actes du colloque organisé les 7 et 8 décembre 2007 par J.-H. Abry (Université Lyon 3) avec la collaboration de I. Boehm (Université Lyon 2). Paris.Google Scholar
Bohrer, K. H. (1981) Plötzlichkeit: Zum Augenblick des ӓsthetischen Scheins. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Boileau Despréaux, N. (1674) Œuvres diverses du Sieur D***. Avec le Traité du sublime, ou, Du merveilleux dans le discours. Traduit du Grec de Longin. Paris.Google Scholar
Boileau Despréaux, N. (1718) Oeuvres de Nicolas Boileau Despréaux, avec des éclaircissemens historiques donnez par lui-même (et le commentaire de Brossette). Nouvelle édition … augmentée de diverses remarques (de Dumonteil). 2 vols. in 4. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Boileau Despréaux, N. (1772 [1669]) “Dissertation sur La Joconde de M. de la Fontaine, à M. B… . .” in Œuvres de Boileau Despréaux, ed. Brossette, C. and de Saint-Marc, L.. Amsterdam. Vol. iii: 372–98.Google Scholar
Bos, A. P. (1993) “Clement of Alexandria on Aristotle's (Cosmo-)Theology (Clem. Protrept. 5.66.4),” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 43, no. 1: 177–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, A. C., and Todd, R. B. (2004) Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy: A Translation of The Heavens. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. (1940) “Sophocles on his Own Development,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 61, no. 3: 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, M. J. (1957) “Longinus, the ‘Philological Discourses,’ and the Essay ‘On the Sublime,’” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 7, no. 1/2: 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1972) “Ennius and the Hellenistic Worship of Homer,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 93, no. 4: 547–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadie, S. (1999) “Rational Theology,” in The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A.. Cambridge. 205–24.Google Scholar
Brody, J. (1966) “Platonisme et classicisme,” in French Classicism: A Critical Miscellany, ed. Brody, J.. Englewood Cliffs. 186–207.Google Scholar
Brzoska, J. (1899) “Caecilius (2),” in Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Supplement, ed. von Pauly, A. F., Wissowa, G., Kroll, W., et al. 16 vols. Stuttgart, vol. iii.5: 1174–88.Google Scholar
Buchheim, T. (1985) “Maler, Sprachbildner: Zur Verwandtschaft des Gorgias mit Empedokles,” Hermes vol. 113, no. 4: 417–29.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1968 [1757; 1759]) A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. Boulton, J. T.. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (2008b) “Eikōs Muthos,” in Plato's Myths, ed. Partenie, C.. Cambridge. 166–86.Google Scholar
Bussels, S., (P. I.) (2012) “Elevated Minds: The Sublime in the Public Arts in 17th-century Paris and Amsterdam.” (Research proposal.)Google Scholar
Bynum, C. W. (2011) Christian Materiality: An Essay on Religion in Late Medieval Europe. New York and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Calcante, C. M. (2004) “Il De elocutione di Demetrio e il De Demosthene di Dionigi di Alicarnasso,” Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo. Classe di Lettere e Scienze Morali e Storiche vol. 138: 99–124.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1991) “How Thin Was Philitas?,” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 41, no. 2: 534–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capelle, W. (1905) “Die Schrift von der Welt: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der griechischen Popularphilosophie. Festschrift der klassisch-philologischen Gesellschaft zu Hamburg der 48. Versammlung deutscher Philologen und Schulmänner zu Hamburg 1905 gewidmet,” Neue Jahrbücher für das klassisches Altertum vol. 15.1, no. 8: 529–68.Google Scholar
Capelle, W. (1916) Berges-und Wolkenhöhen bei griechischen Physikern. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Capizzi, A. (1983) “Mente elevata e mente profonda: Hypsos e bathos dal concreto alla metafora,” in Il Sublime: Contributi per la storia di un'idea, ed. Casertano, G. and Martano, G.. Naples. 55–75.Google Scholar
Casaubon, M. (1655) A treatise concerning enthusiasme, as it is an effect of nature: but is mistaken by many for either divine inspiration, or diabolical possession. London.Google Scholar
Casertano, G. (1983) “Pathos e techne nell'Anonimo Del Sublime,” in Il Sublime: Contributi per la storia di un'idea, ed. Casertano, G. and Martano, G.. Naples. 103–29.Google Scholar
Caussin, N. (1630) De eloquentia sacra et humana libri xvi, 3rd edn. Paris. (1st edn. 1617/18.)Google Scholar
Celan, P. (1983) Gesammelte Werke, ed. Allemann, B., Reichert, S. and Bücher, R.. 5 vols. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. (2009) Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: Histoire des mots, ed. Taillardat, J., Blanc, A., Masson, O., et al. Paris.Google Scholar
Cheney, P. (2009) Marlowe's Republican Authorship: Lucan, Liberty, and the Sublime. New York.Google Scholar
Chiron, P. (2001) Un rhéteur méconnu: Démétrios (Ps.-Démétrios de Phalére). Essai sur les mutations de la théorie du style à l’époque hellénistique. Paris.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1997) “Lucretius’ Gigantomachy,” in Lucretius and his Intellectual Background, ed. Algra, K., Koenen, M. H. and Schrijvers, P. H.. Amsterdam. 187–92.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (1990) Table Talk. Recorded by Henry Nelson Coleridge (and John Taylor Coleridge), ed. Woodring, C.. 2 vols. (= The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. xiv). London and Princeton.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (1995) Shorter Works and Fragments, ed. Jackson, H. J. and Jackson, J. R. de J.. 2 vols. (= The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. xi) Princeton.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (2003) On the Sublime, ed. Vaillins, D.. (= Coleridge's Writings, vol. v, ed. Beer, J.). Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1965) “Il trionfo della morte e la galleria dei grandi trapassati in Lucrezio iii, 1024–1053,” Studi italiani di filologia classica vol. 37: 114–32.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1966) “Hypsos e diatriba nello stile di Lucrezio: De Rer. Nat. ii 1–61,” Maia vol. 18: 338–68.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1991a) Generi e lettori: Lucrezio, l'elegia d'amore, l'enciclopedia di Plinio. Milan.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1991b) “Insegnamenti per un lettore sublime: Forma del testo e forma del desintatoriao nel De rerum natura di Lucrezio,” in Conte, , Generi e lettori: Lucrezio, l'elegia d'amore, l'enciclopedia di Plinio. Milan. 9–52.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (2007) “Anatomy of a Style: Enallage and the New Sublime,” in The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford. 58–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, E. M. (1877) The Rhetoric of Aristotle, with a Commentary, ed. and rev. Sandys, J. E.. 3 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Costa, G. (1985) “The Latin Translations of Longinus’s περὶ ὕψους in Renaissance Italy,” in Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Bononiensis: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Neo-Latin Studies Bologna, 26 August to 1 September 1979, ed. Schoeck, R. J.. Binghamton, NY. 224–38.Google Scholar
Costelloe, T. M. (2012) “The Sublime: A Short Introduction to a Long History,” in The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present, ed. Costelloe, T. M.. Cambridge. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costil, P. (1944) “La composition et la doctrine du Περὶ λέξεως de Théophraste,” in Mélanges J. Saunier, ed. Gardette, P., Gallay, P. and Molager, J.. Lyon. 53–79.Google Scholar
Costil, P. (1949) “L'Esthétique littéraire de Denys d'Halicarnasse: Étude sur le classement et la doctrine des Opera rhetorica.” Diss., Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Costil, P. (1951) “L'Esthétique stoïcienne,” in Actes du Premier Congrès de la Fedération Internationale des Associations d’Études Classiques, Paris. 360–4.Google Scholar
Coulter, J. A. (1976) The Literary Microcosm: Theories of Interpretation of the Later Neoplatonists. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courcelle, P. (1967) La Consolation de philosophie dans la tradition littéraire: Antécédents et postérité de Boèce. Paris.Google Scholar
Crane, R. S. (1936) “Review of S. Monk, The Sublime,” Philological Quarterly vol. 15, no. 2: 165–7.Google Scholar
Crisp, R. (2006) “Aristotle on Greatness of Soul,” in The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Kraut, R.. Malden, MA and Oxford. 158–78.Google Scholar
Crönert, W. (1906) Kolotes und Menedemos: Texte und Untersuchungen zur Philosophen‐ und Literaturgeschichte. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Cronk, N. (2002) The Classical Sublime: French Neoclassicism and the Language of Literature. Charlottesville.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, R. J. (1924) A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect. London, Glasgow, and Bombay. (Repr. 1963, Norman, OK.)Google Scholar
Curtius, E. R. (1953) European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Trans. Trask, W. R.. New York. (German original, 1948.)Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (2000) “In the Margins of Byzantium? Some Icons in Michael Psellos,” in Byzantium, Italy and the North: Papers on Cultural Relations, ed. Cutler, A. and Browning, M.. London. (First published in Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 16 (1992)).Google Scholar
Daiber, H. (1992) “The Meteorology in Syriac and Arabic Translation,” in Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific Writings, ed. Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Gutas, D.. New Brunswick. 166–293.Google Scholar
Damon, C. (1991) “Aesthetic Response and Technical Analysis in the Rhetorical Writings of Dionysius of Halicarnassus,” Museum Helveticum vol. 48: 33–58.Google Scholar
Day, H. J. M. (2013) Lucan and the Sublime: Power, Representation and Aesthetic Experience. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2005) “Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Method of Metathesis,” Classical Quarterly vol. 55, no. 2: 463–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2008) Between Grammar and Rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2009) Review of Marini, N., ed. Demetrio, Lo Stile (Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 2007). Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 12 August.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2011) “Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Scholia on Thucydides’ Syntax,” in Ancient Scholarship and Grammar Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts, ed. Matthaios, S., Montanari, F. and Rengakos, A.. Berlin. 451–78.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2012) “Dionysius and Longinus on the Sublime: Rhetoric and Religious Language,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 153, no. 2: 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2013) “Longinus 36.3: The Faulty Colossus and Plato's Phaedrus,” Trends in Classics vol. 5, no. 2: 318–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2014) “The Attic Muse and the Asian Harlot: Classicizing Allegories in Dionysius and Longinus,” in Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World. Proceedings from the Penn-Leiden Colloquia on Ancient Values, vol. vii. ed. Ker, J. and Pieper, C.. Leiden. 388–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lacy, P. (1943) “The Philosophy of the Aetna,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association vol. 74: 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vivo, A. (1989) “Considerazioni sull’Aetna: Rapporti con Seneca, epoca della composizione,” Vichiana vol. 17: 63–85.Google Scholar
DeJean, J. (1987) “Fictions of Sappho,” Critical Inquiry vol. 13, no. 4: 787–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delarue, F. (2004) “Le sublime et Pline, Ep. ix,26,” in Epistulae antiquae iii: Actes du iiie Colloque international ‘L’épistolaire antique et ses prolongements européens’ (Université François-Rabelais, Tours, 25–27 Septembre 2002), ed. Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, É.. Louvain and Dudley, MA. 449–61.Google Scholar
Delarue, F. (2006) “Sénèque lecteur d'Ovide et le Traité du Sublime.” In Interférences, Ars Scribendi, 4. http://ars-scribendi.ens-lsh.frGoogle Scholar
Delatte, A. (1934) Les conceptions de l'enthousiasme chez les philosophes présocratiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Dennis, J. (1701) The Advancement and Reformation of Modern Poetry: A Critical Discourse in Two Parts [etc.]. London.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1884) “Gorgias und Empedokles,” Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften vol. 49: 343–68.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1969) “Lukrezstudien ii–iii,” in Diels, Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, ed. Burkert, W.. Darmstadt. 340–56. [Originally published in Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Berlin, 1920, pp. 2–18.].Google Scholar
Dobbin, R. (trans.) (2008) Epictetus, , Discourses and Selected Writings. London and New York.Google Scholar
Dobson, J. F. (1918) “The Posidonius Myth,” The Classical Quarterly vol. 12, no. 4: 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, J. (1892) “The Festal Origin of Human Speech,” Mind n.s. vol. 1, no. 3: 325–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorandi, T. (ed.) (1991) Filodemo, Storia dei filosofi: Platone e l'Academia (P. Herc. 1021 e 164). Naples.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1956) “Cicero, Quintilian, and the Canon of Ten Attic Orators,” Mnemosyne vol. 49, no. 1: 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drerup, E. (1923) Demosthenes im Urteile des Altertums: Von Theopomp bis Tzetzes. Geschichte, Roman, Legende. Würzburg.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2005) Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düring, I. (ed.) (1961) Aristotle's Protrepticus: An Attempt at Reconstruction. Göteborg.Google Scholar
Dušanić, S. (1999) “Isocrates, the Chian Intellectuals, and the Political Context of the Euthydemus,” Journal of Hellenic Studies vol. 119: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, Caroline van (2005) “‘A Most Solemn and Awfull Appearance’: Seventeenth-Century Translations of Longinus and the Church Architecture of Hawksmoor,” in Histories of the Sublime: 9–10 December 2005, ed. Madelein, C., Pieters, J. and Vandenabeele, B.. Brussels. 23–32.Google Scholar
Eck, Caroline van, Bussels, S., Delbeke, M., and Pieters, J. (eds.) (2012) Translations of the Sublime: The Early Modern Reception and Dissemination of Longinus’ Peri Hupsous in Rhetoric, the Visual Arts, Architecture and the Theatre. Leiden.Google Scholar
Effe, B. (1977) Dichtung und Lehre: Untersuchungen zur Typologie des antiken Lehrgedichts. Zetemata vol. 69. Munich.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1899) “The Literary Relations of ‘Longinus’ and Manilius,” Classical Review vol. 13, no. 6: 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E., (2011) “More Sentiment than Science: Roman Stargazing before and after Manilius,” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E., (2013) Roman Literary Culture: From Plautus to Macrobius, 2nd edn. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1987) Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato's Phaedrus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrario, M. (1972) “Ricerche intorno al Trattato del sublime,” Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo, Classe di lettere, scienze morali e storiche vol. 106: 765–843.Google Scholar
Ferri, R. (1993) I dispiaceri di un epicureo: uno studio sulla poetica oraziana delle Epistole (con un capitolo su Persio). Pisa.Google Scholar
Flacius Illyricus, M. (1629) Clavis Scripturae, seu De sermone sacrarum literarum, 2nd edn. 2 vols. Basil. (1st edn. 1567.)Google Scholar
Flores, E. (1996) “Gli Astronomica di Manilio e l'Epicureismo,” in Epicureismo greco e romano: Atti del congresso internazionale, Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1993, ed. Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M.. Naples. ii: 895–908.Google Scholar
Forster, E. S., and Furley, D. J. (trans.) (1955) Aristotle, On Sophistical Refutations. On Coming-to-be and Passing-away. [Aristotle] On the Cosmos. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (1966) “Plato Phaedrus 235c3,” Classical Philology vol. 61, no. 2: 108–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (2005) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary Volume 8, Sources on Rhetoric and Poetics (Texts 666–713). Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (2006) “On the Composition of Aristotle's Rhetoric: Arguing the Issue, Emotional Appeal, Persuasion through Character, and Characters Tied to Age and Fortune,” in Fortenbaugh, , Aristotle's Practical Side: On His Psychology, Ethics, Politics and Rhetoric. Leiden and Boston. 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., and White, S. A. (eds.) (2006) Aristo of Ceos: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1986) The Care of the Self: Volume 3 of The History of Sexuality. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2005) The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981–82, ed. Gros, F.. Trans. Burchell, G.. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. (2002) Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De rerum natura, Book Two, Lines 1–332. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1974) “Xenophanes’ Empiricism and his Critique of Knowledge (b34),” in The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D.. Garden City, NY. 118–31.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1993) Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums: Eine Geschichte der griechischen Epik, Lyrik und Prosa bis zur Mitte des fünften Jahrhunderts, 4th edn. Munich. (1st edn. 1951.)Google Scholar
Fumaroli, M. (1986) “Rhétorique d’école et rhétorique adulte: remarques sur la réception européenne du traité Du sublime au xvie et au xviie siècle,” Revue d'histoire littéraire de la France vol. 86, no. 1: 33–51.Google Scholar
Fumaroli, M. (1990) “Le crépuscule de l'enthousiasme,” in Fumaroli, , Héros et orateurs: Rhétorique et dramaturgie cornéliennes. Geneva. 349–98.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1999) “Cosmology,” in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Algra, K.. Cambridge. 412–51.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (2002) “Anaxagoras and the Naming of Parts,” in Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Graham, D. and Caston, V.. Aldershot. 119–26.Google Scholar
Gagarin, M. (2002) Antiphon the Athenian: Oratory, Law, and Justice in the Age of the Sophists. Austin.Google Scholar
Gagarin, M., and Woodruff, P. (1995) Early Greek Political Thought from Homer to the Sophists. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaiser, K. (ed.) (1988) Philodems Academica: Die Berichte über Platon und die Alte Akademie in zwei herkulanensischen Papyri. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar
Gale, M. (2011) “Digressions, Intertextuality, and Ideology in Didactic Poetry: The Case of Manilius,” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 205–21.Google Scholar
Gallavotti, C. (1975) “Empedocle nei papiri ercolanesi,” in Le monde grec: Pensée, littérature, histoire et documents. Hommages à Claire Préaux, ed. Bingen, J., Cambier, G. and Nachtergal, G.. Brussels. 153–61.Google Scholar
Garani, M. (2007) Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and Analogy in Lucretius. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauls, N. (2010) “The Manuscript Tradition,” in A Companion to the Greek Language, ed. Bakker, E.. Malden, MA. 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geigenmueller, P. (1908) “Quaestiones Dionysianae de vocabulis artis criticae.” Diss., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gercke, A., and Norden, E. (eds.) (1910) Einleitung in die Altertumswissenschaft. 3 vols. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Gibbon, E. (1776) The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. 6 vols. London.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1995) Philodemus in Italy: The Books from Herculaneum. Trans. Obbink, D.. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladstone, W. E. (1889) “Phœnician Affinites of Ithaca,” The Nineteenth Century vol. 26: 280–93.Google Scholar
Gomoll, H. (1933) “Caecilius’ Stellung zu den σχήματα διανοίας,” Rheinisches Museum vol. 82: 59–66.Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. (1984) “The ‘Aetna’: Thought, Antecedents, and Style,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt vol. 2.32.1: 344–63.Google Scholar
Goold, G. P. (1961) “A Greek Professorial Circle at Rome,” Transactions of the American Philological Association vol. 92: 168–92.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (ed.) (1980) Cléomède: Théorie élémentaire (“De motu circulari corporum caelestium”). Paris.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., and Weinberg, J. (2011) “I Have Always Loved the Holy Tongue”: Isaac Casaubon, the Jews, and a Forgotten Chapter in Renaissance Scholarship. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, D. (2004) “Was Anaxagoras a Reductionist?,” Ancient Philosophy vol. 24: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, D. (2013) “The Theology of Nature in the Ionian Tradition,” Rhizomata vol. 1, no. 2: 194–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grene, D. (trans.) (1991) Aeschylus, Prometheus Bound, in Aeschylus ii: The Suppliant Maidens, The Persians, Seven Against Thebes, Prometheus Bound, ed. Grene, D. and Lattimore, R.. 2nd edn. Chicago.Google Scholar
Grenfell, B. P., and Hunt, A. S. (eds.) (1903) The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. iii. London.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1987) “Homer and Excess,” in Homer: Beyond Oral Poetry. Recent Trends in Homeric Interpretation, ed. Bremer, J. M., de Jong, I. J. F. and Kalff, J.. Amsterdam. 85–104.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (1978) “Aeschylus, Sicily and Prometheus,” in Dionysiaca: Nine Studies in Greek Poetry by Former Pupils. Presented to Sir Denys Page on his Seventieth Birthday, ed. Dawe, R. D., Diggle, J. and Easterling, P. E.. Cambridge. 105–41.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. (1952) “Theophrastus as a Literary Critic,” Transactions of the American Philological Association vol. 83: 172–83.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. (ed.) (1957a) Longinus, On Great Writing (On the Sublime). Trans. Grube, G. M. A., New York.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. (1957b) “Notes on the Περὶ ὕψους,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 78, no. 4: 355–74.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. (1959) “Theodorus of Gadara,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 80, no. 4: 337–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gründler, H. (2012) “Orrore, terrore, timore: Vasari und das Erhabene,” in Translations of the Sublime: The Early Modern Reception and Dissemination of Longinus’ Peri hupsous in Rhetoric, the Visual Arts, Architecture and the Theatre, ed. van Eck, C., Bussels, S., Delbeke, M., and Pieters, J.. Leiden. 83–116.Google Scholar
Gudeman, A. (ed.) (1934) Aristoteles, Περὶ ποιητικῆς. Mit exegetischem Kommentar. Berlin.Google Scholar
Guerlac, S. (1985) “Longinus and the Subject of the Sublime,” New Literary History vol. 16, no. 2: 275–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T. (2011) “Manilius’ Conflicted Stoicism,” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadot, P. (1995a) Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, ed. Davidson, A. I.. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1995b) “The View from Above,” in Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, ed. Davidson, A. I.. Malden, MA. 238–50.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2011) “Antidotes and Incantations: Is There a Cure for Poetry in Plato's Republic?,” in Plato and the Poets, ed. Destrée, P. and Herrmann, F.-G.. Leiden. 241–66.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2012) Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S., Fyfe, W. H., Russell, D. A., Innes, D., and Roberts, W. R. (trans.) (1995) Aristotle, Poetics; Longinus, On the Sublime; Demetrius, On Style. Cambridge, MA. (Repr. 1999.)Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1995) “The Presence of Lucretius in Paradise Lost,” Milton Quarterly vol. 29: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. (2007) “Lucretius and Later Latin Literature in Antiquity,” in The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, ed. Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P.. Cambridge. 111–27.Google Scholar
Häussler, R. (1995) “Zur Datierung der Schrift vom Erhabenen,” in Prinzipat und Kultur im 1. und 2. Jahrhundert: Wissenschaftliche Tagung der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena und der Iwane-Dshawachischwili-Universität Tbilissi, 27.–30. Oktober 1992 in Jena, ed. Kühnert, B., Riedel, V. and Gordeziani, R. V.. Bonn. 141–63.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A. (1972) “The Socratic Self As It Is Parodied in Aristophanes’ Clouds,” Yale Classical Studies vol. 22: 1–18.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (1999) “Longinus, On Sublimity,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society n.s. vol. 45: 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, M. (2012) “Longinus and the Ancient Sublime,” in The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present, ed. Costelloe, T. M.. Cambridge. 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975) Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. Trans. Knox, T. M.. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2011) “Watch This Space (Getting Round 1.215–46),” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L. (1905) “The Origin and Meaning of the Ancient Characters of Style,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 26, no. 3: 249–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, H. (2005) “Renaissance Roots of the Sublime: Ugliness, Horror and Pleasure in Early Modern Italian Debates on Literature and Art,” in Histories of the Sublime: 9–10 December 2005, ed. Madelein, C., Pieters, J. and Vandenabeele, B.. Brussels. 13–22.Google Scholar
Henry, A. (ed.) (1986) The Mirour of mans saluacioun[e]: A Middle English Translation of Speculum humanae salvationis. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Hertz, N. (1983) “A Reading of Longinus,” Critical Inquiry vol. 9, no. 3: 579–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidber, T. (1996) Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass: Die Praefatio zu “De oratoribus veteribus.” Einleitung, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogarth, W. (1753) The Analysis of Beauty: Written with a View of Fixing the Fluctuating Ideas of Taste. London.Google Scholar
Holtz, L. (1997) “Titre et incipit,” in Titres et articulations du texte dans les oeuvres antiques: Actes du colloque international de Chantilly, 13–15 décembre 1994, ed. Fredouille, J. C., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Hoffmann, P., et al. Paris. 469–89.Google Scholar
Hommel, H. (1951) “Aristophanes über die Nilschwelle,” Rheinisches Museum vol. 44: 315–27.Google Scholar
Hooley, D. (2012) “Prelude: Classical Mountain Landscapes and the Language of Ascent,” in Heights of Reflection: Mountains in the German Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Twenty-First Century, ed. Ireton, S. M. and Schaumann, C.. Rochester, NY. 20–32.Google Scholar
Hubbard, M. E. (trans.) (1972) Aristotle, Poetics, in Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations, ed. Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, M. Oxford.Google Scholar
Huet, P.-D., and Le Clerc, J. (1706) “Examen du sentiment de Longin sur ce passage de la Genese: & Dieu dit: que la lumiere soit faite & la lumiere fut faite,” in Bibliotheque choisie, pour servir de suite à la Bibliotheque universelle, ed. Le Clerc, J.. Amsterdam. x:211–60.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1985) Essays Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, E. F.. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Hunink, V. J. C. (1989) “Ondergrondse stromen: Lucretius en de Aetna-dichter,” Lampas vol. 22: 22–35.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (1995) “Written in the Stars: Poetry and Philosophy in the Phaenomena of Aratus,” Arachnaion vol. 1, no. 2. www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num2/hunter.html (Accessed 2 August 2011).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2009) Critical Moments in Classical Literature: Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and its Uses. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. (2012) Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2011) “Politics and the Sublime in the Panegyricus,” in Pliny's Praise: The Panegyricus in the Roman World, ed. Roche, P. A.. Cambridge. 125–41.Google Scholar
Hyde, W. W. (1915) “The Ancient Appreciation of Mountain Scenery,” The Classical Journal vol. 11, no. 2: 70–84.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C. (1979) “Gigantomachy and Natural Philosophy,” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 29: 165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, D. C. (1985) “Theophrastus and the Theory of Style,” in Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Work, ed. Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M. and Long, A. A.. New Brunswick. 251–67.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C. (1995) “Longinus, Sublimity, and Low Emotions,” in Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday, ed. Innes, D., Hine, H. M. and Pelling, C. B. R.. Oxford. 323–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, D. C. (2002) “Longinus and Caecilius: Models of the Sublime,” Mnemosyne vol. 55, no. 3: 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, C. S. (ed.) (2010) Magnificence and the Sublime in Medieval Aesthetics: Art, Architecture, Literature, Music. New York.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1981) “The Dominant,” in Selected Writings, Volume iii: Poetry of Grammar and Grammar of Poetry, ed. Rudy, S.. The Hague and New York. 751–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, F. (1973) “The Vanishing Mediator: Narrative Structure in Max Weber,” New German Critique vol. 1 (Winter): 52–89. (Repr. in Fredric Jameson, The Ideologies of Theory: Essays, 1971–1986 (Minneapolis, 1988), ii:3–34.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankélévitch, V. (1980) Le je-ne-sais-quoi et le presque-rien. 3 vols. Paris. (1st edn. 1957.)Google Scholar
Jankélévitch, V. (1986) L'imprescriptible. Pardonner? Dans l'honneur et la dignité. Paris.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (ed.) (2000) Philodemus, On Poems, Book 1. Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (ed.) (2010) Philodemus, On Poems, Books 3–4: With the Fragments of Aristotle, On Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jex-Blake, K., Sellers, E., and Urlichs, H. L. (1896) The Elder Pliny's Chapters on the History of Art. Translated by Jex-Blake, K.. With Commentary and Historical Introduction by Sellers, E. and Additional Notes Contributed by Urlichs, Heinrich Ludwig. London. (Repr. Chicago, 1976.)Google Scholar
Johnson, M., and Wilson, C. (2007) “Lucretius and the History of Science,” in The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, ed. Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P.. Cambridge. 131–48.Google Scholar
Jones, R. M. (1926) “Posidonius and the Flight of the Mind through the Universe,” Classical Philology vol. 21, no. 2: 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafka, F. (1992) Nachgelassene Schriften und Fragmente ii, ed. Schillemeit, J.. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. (1985) “The Place of the Prime Mover in Aristotle's Teleology,” in Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on his Seventieth Birthday, ed. Balme, D. M. and Gotthelf, A.. Pittsburgh, PA and Bristol, England. 183–205.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1992) “Aristotle on Thinking,” in Essays on Aristotle's De anima, ed. Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A.. Oxford. 359–79.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1997) “Greek Religion and Philosophy in the Sisyphus Fragment,” Phronesis vol. 42, no. 3: 247–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaibel, G. (1899) “Cassius Longinus und die Schrift Περὶ ὕψους,” Hermes vol. 34, no. 1: 107–32.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment, ed. Guyer, P.. Trans. Guyer, P. and Matthews, E.. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, W. (1974) Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist, 4th edn. Princeton. (1st edn. 1950.)Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2011) “Sums in Verse or a Mathematical Aesthetic?,” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 165–87.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (trans.) (2007) Aristotle, , On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. New York.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1989) The Concept of Irony, with Continual Reference to Socrates, together with Notes of Schelling's Berlin Lectures. Trans. Hong, Howard Vincent and Hong, E. H.. Princeton.Google Scholar
Killeen, J. F. (1973) “Sappho fr. 111,” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 23, no. 2: 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindstrand, J. F. (1982) The Stylistic Evaluation of Aeschines in Antiquity. Uppsala and Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. (1995) Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kircher, A. (1665) Athanasii Kircheri Mundus subterraneus, in xii libros digestus; quo Divinum Subterrestris Mundi Opificium, mira Ergasteriorum Naturae in eo distributio, verbo παντάμορφον Protei regnum, Universae denique Naturae Majestas & divitiae summa rerum varietate exponuntur. Abditorum effectuum causae acri indagine inquisitae demonstrantur; cognitae per artis & naturae conjugium ad humanae vitae necessarium usum vario experimentorum apparatu, necnon novo modo, & ratione applicantur. 2 vols. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. (1963) “A Fragment of Sappho Reinterpreted,” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 13, no. 1: 51–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M. (1983) The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts, 2nd edn. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, Rachel Ahern (2014). Homeric Speech and the Origins of Rhetoric. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhnken, A. (2002) “Licht und Schatten bei Pseudo-Longin,” in Alvarium: Festschrift für Christian Gnilka. Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum, Ergänzungsband 33, ed. Blümer, W., Henke, R. and Mülke, M.. Münster. 211–18.Google Scholar
Koninck, T. D. (1994) “Aristotle on God as Thought Thinking Itself,” The Review of Metaphysics vol. 47, no. 3: 471–515.Google Scholar
Körte, A. (1890) “Metrodori Epicurei fragmenta,” Jahrbücher für classische Philologie Suppl. Bd. 17: 571–91.Google Scholar
Kosman, A. (2000) “Metaphysics Λ 9: Divine Thought,” in Aristotle's Metaphysics Lambda: Symposium Aristotelicum, ed. Frede, M. and Charles, D.. Oxford. 307–26.Google Scholar
Koster, W. J. W. (ed.) (1975) Prolegomena de comoedia. Scholia in Aristophanem, Fasc. 1A. Gröningen.Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. (2007) Singing for the Gods: Performances of Myth and Ritual in Archaic and Classical Greece. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1990) “The Modern System of the Arts,” in Kristeller, , Renaissance Thought and the Arts: Collected Essays. Expanded edn. Princeton. 163–227. (First published in the Journal of the History of Ideas 12 (1951) 496–527 and 13 (1952) 17–46.)Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1918) “Die historische Stellung von Horazens Ars poetica,” Sokrates: Zeitschrift für Gymnasialwesen n.s. vol. 6, no. 3/4: 81–98.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1940) “Rhetorik,” in Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Supplement, ed. von Pauly, A. F., Wissowa, G., Kroll, W., et al. 16 vols. Stuttgart. vii: 1039–138.Google Scholar
Krumbacher, A. (1920) Die Stimmbildung der Redner im Altertum bis auf die Zeit Quintilians. Paderborn.Google Scholar
Kühn, J. H. (1941) ὕψος: Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Aufschwungsgedankens von Platon bis Poseidonios. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1991) The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (2007) “Archaic Greek Poetry,” in The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Shapiro, H. A.. Cambridge. 141–68.Google Scholar
Kurtz, E., and Drexl, F. (eds.) (1936–1941) Psellus, M., Scripta minora, magnam partem adhuc inedita. 2 vols. Milan.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1986) Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan. Livre vii: L’Éthique de la psychanalyse [1959–1960], ed. Miller, J.-A.. Paris.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (2001) Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan. Livre viii: Le Transfert [1960–61], ed. Miller, J.-A.. 2nd, corrected edn. Paris.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, P. (1991a) “Sublime Truth (Part 1),” Trans. Kuchta, D.. Cultural Critique, no. 18: 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, P. (1991b) “Sublime Truth (Part 2),” Trans. Kuchta, D.. Cultural Critique, no. 20: 207–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (2003) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago. (First published 1980.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laks, A. (1983) Diogéne d'Apollonie: La dernière cosmologie présocratique. Lille and Paris.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (1993) “Mind's Crisis: On Anaxagoras’ νοῦς,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy vol. 31, Supplement: 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laks, A. (2000) “Metaphysics Λ 7,” in Aristotle's Metaphysics Lambda: Symposium Aristotelicum, ed. Frede, M. and Charles, D.. Oxford. 207–43.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (2002) “‘Philosophes présocratiques’: Remarques sur la construction d'une catégorie de l'historiographie philosophique,” in Qu'est-ce que la philosophie présocratique? What is Presocratic Philosophy?, ed. Laks, A. and Louguet, C.. Villeneuve-d'Ascq. 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, J. (1993) “Longinus, the Dialectic, and the Practice of Mastery,” ELH vol. 60, no. 3: 545–67.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. (1986) Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Landolfi, L. (1990) “Manilio e le ansie dell'insegnamento: L’excursus metodologico (Astr. ii, 750–787),” Pan vol. 10: 27–37.Google Scholar
Landolfi, L. (1992) “Caeli cavernae: fortuna di uno stilema,” Vichiana 3rd series, vol. 3, no. 1–2: 208–19.Google Scholar
Langdon, H. (2004) “A Theatre of Marvels: The Poetics of Salvator Rosa,” Konsthistorisk Tidskrift vol. 73, no. 3: 179–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langdon, H. (2011) “The Representation of Philosophers in the Art of Salvator Rosa,” kunsttexte.de vol. 2: 1–17. http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/kunsttexte/20112/langdon-helen-4/PDF/langdon.pdf (accessed 12/01/2014)Google Scholar
Lapidge, M. (1979) “Lucan's Imagery of Cosmic Dissolution,” Hermes vol. 107, no. 3: 344–70.Google Scholar
Lassandro, D. (1993) “Nosse fidem rerum: L'elogio della scienza nell’Aetna,” Bollettino di studi latini vol. 23: 320–8.Google Scholar
Leaf, W. (ed.) (1900) The Iliad. Edited, with Apparatus Criticus, Prolegomena, Notes, and Appendices. 2 vols. 2nd edn. London and New York.Google Scholar
Lear, J. (1995) “Testing the Limits: The Place of Tragedy in Aristotle's Ethics,” in Aristotle and Moral Realism, ed. Heinaman, R.. Boulder. 61–84.Google Scholar
Lebeck, A. (1972) “The Central Myth of Plato's Phaedrus,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies vol. 13: 267–90.Google Scholar
Lech, M. L. (2008) “A Possible Date of the Revival of Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes,” The Classical Quarterly vol. 58, no. 2: 661–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. F. von (1849–1863) Leibnizens mathematische Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, C. I.. 7 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (2006) “Statius and the Sublimity of Capaneus,” in Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition Presented to Jasper Griffin, ed. Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F. and Lyne, R. O. A. M.. Oxford. 217–41.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. (ed.) (1992) Xenophanes of Colophon: Fragments. A Text and Translation with Commentary. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liers, H. (1885) “Zur Geschichte der rhetorischen Ideenlehre,” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Paedagogik vol. 131: 577–89.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1979) Magic, Reason, and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lobsien, V. O., and Olk, C. (2007) Neuplatonismus und Ästhetik: Zur Transformationsgeschichte des Schönen. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, J. (1999) “Longinus and the Sublime,” in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: The Renaissance, ed. Norton, G. P.. Cambridge. 529–39.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1997) “Lucretius on Nature and the Epicurean Self,” in Lucretius and his Intellectual Background, ed. Algra, K., Koenen, M. H. and Schrijvers, P. H.. Amsterdam. 128–32.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1999a) “The Scope of Early Greek Philosophy,” in The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A.. Cambridge. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (ed.) (1999b) The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowth, R. (1815) Lectures on the Sacred Poetry of the Hebrews. Trans. Gregory, G.. Boston.Google Scholar
Lühr, F.-F. (1969) “Ratio und Fatum: Dichtung und Lehre bei Manilius.” Diss., J.-W. Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Lühr, F.-F. (1971) “Die Kritik des Aetna-Dichters an Manilius,” Hermes vol. 99, no. 2: 141–9.Google Scholar
Luschnat, O. (1954) “Die Thukydidesscholien: Zu ihrer handschriftlichen Grundlage, Herkunft und Geschichte,” Philologus vol. 98: 14–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, J., and Perdrizet, P. (eds.) (1907) Speculum humanae salvationis: Texte critique. Traduction inédite de Jean Miélot (1448). Les sources et l'influence iconographique principalement sur l'art alsacien du xive siècle, avec la reproduction en 140 planches du Manuscrit de Sélestat de la série complète des vitraux de Mulhouse, de vitraux de Colmar, de Wissembourg [etc.]. Vol. i. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Luzzatto, T. (1981) “Pseudo Longino e Cecilio di Calatte: A proposito di un giudizio su Eschilo,” Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica vol. 53: 50–100.Google Scholar
Lynn-George, M. (1988) Epos: Word, Narrative and the Iliad. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1982) “Presenting the Unpresentable: The Sublime,” Artforum vol. 20 no. 8: 64–9.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1991) “The Sublime and the Avant-garde,” in The Inhuman: Reflections on Time, trans. Bennington, G. and Bowlby, R.. Stanford. 89–107. (First published in Arforum no. 8 (April) 1984, 36–43.)Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1994) Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime: Kant's Critique of Judgment, §§ 23–29. Stanford.Google Scholar
Maguire, J. P. (1939) “The Sources of the Pseudo-Aristotle De Mundo,” Yale Classical Studies vol. 6: 3–67.Google Scholar
Mangoni, C. (ed.) (1993) Filodemo: Il quinto libro della Poetica (P. Herc. 1425 e 1538). Naples.Google Scholar
Mann, W.-R. (2011) “On Two Stoic ‘Paradoxes’ in Manilius,” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992a) “A Theophrastean Excursus on God and Nature and its Aftermath in Hellenistic Thought,” Phronesis vol. 37: 314–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992b) “Περὶ κόσμου: A Note on the History of a Title,” Vigiliae Christianae vol. 46, no. 4: 391–411.Google Scholar
Marg, W. (ed.) (1972) Timaeus Locrus, De natura mundi et animae: Überlieferung, Testimonia, Text und Übersetzung. Leiden.Google Scholar
Martin, É. M. (2012) “The ‘Prehistory’ of the Sublime in Early Modern France,” in The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present, ed. Costelloe, T. M.. Cambridge. 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, F. (1898) “Die Zeit der Schrift vom Erhabenen,” Wiener Studien vol. 20: 169–204.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1964) The Economic & Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, ed. Struik, D. J.. New York.Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. J. (1990) “Actors on High: The Skene Roof, the Crane, and the Gods in Attic Drama,” Classical Antiquity vol. 9: 247–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthieson, K. (1968) “Zur Theonoeszene der euripideischen ‘Helena’,” Hermes vol. 96: 685–704.Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. (2010) “The Theology of the Laws,” in Plato's Laws: A Critical Guide, ed. Bobonich, C.. Cambridge. 197–216.Google Scholar
Mazzoli, G. (1996) “Orazio e il sublime,” in Doctus Horatius: Atti del Convegno di Studi per Virginio Cremona (Brescia 9–10 febbraio 1995), ed. Cova, P. V.. Milano. 21–40.Google Scholar
Mazzucchi, C. M. (1989) “La tradizione manoscritta del Περὶ ὕψους,” Italia medioevale e umanistica vol. 32: 206–26.Google Scholar
Mazzucchi, C. M. (ed.) (2010) Dionisio Longino, Del sublime: Introduzione, testa critico, traduzione e commentario. Rev. and enlarged edn. Milan. (1st edn. 1992).Google Scholar
Menn, S. (1992) “Aristotle and Plato on God as Nous and as the Good,” The Review of Metaphysics vol. 45, no. 3: 543–73.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (1969) “Rhétorique, tragédie, philosophie: Sénèque et le sublime,” Giornale italiano di filologia vol. 21: 245–57.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (1976) “Rhétorique et poétique: La theorie du sublime de Platon aux modernes,” Révue des Études Latines vol. 54: 278–307.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (1986) “Sublime et Parole de Dieu: De Saint Augustin à Fenelon,” Revue d'histoire littéraire de la France vol. 86, no. 1: 52–61.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1963) “Thoughts on Poetry and its Varieties,” in Autobiography and Literary Essays, ed. Robson, J. M. and Stillinger, J.. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto. Vol. i: 341–65.Google Scholar
Miller, J.-A. (1977/8) “Suture (Elements of the Logic of the Signifier),” Screen vol. 18, no. 4: 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. (2001) “‘First of all’: On the Semantics and Ethics of Hesiod's Cosmogony,” Ancient Philosophy vol. 21: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. (2006) “Ambiguity and Transport: Reflections on the Proem to Parmenides’ Poem,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy vol. 30: 1–47.Google Scholar
Monk, S. H. (1960 [1935]) The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in xviii-Century England. [Ann Arbor]. (1st edn. 1935.)Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. (2006) “Should the Aspiring Wise Man Travel? A Conflict in Seneca's Thought,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 127 , no. 4: 553–86.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. (2011) From Villain to Hero: Odysseus in Ancient Thought. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, W., and Wilson, H. A. (trans.) (1956) Select Writings and Letters of Gregory, Bishop of Nyssa. Grand Rapids.Google Scholar
More, H. (1646) Democritus Platonissans, or, An essay upon the infinity of worlds out of Platonick principles. Hereunto is annexed Cupids conflict, together with the Philosophers devotion: And a particular interpretation appertaining to the three last books of the Song of the soul. Cambridge.Google Scholar
More, H. (1662) A Collection of Several Philosophical Writings of Dr. Henry More. London.Google Scholar
More, H. (1682) Annotations upon the two foregoing treatises, Lux orientalis, or, An enquiry into the opinion of the Eastern sages concerning the prae-existence of souls, and the Discourse of truth (etc.). London.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. A. (2000) Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morpurgo-Tagliabue, G. (1979 [1980]) “Il χαρακτὴρ δεινός di Demetrio e la sua datazione,” Rendiconti dell’ Accademia di archeologia, lettere e belle arti di Napoli n.s. vol. 54: 281–318.Google Scholar
Morris, D. B. (1972) The Religious Sublime: Christian Poetry and Critical Tradition in 18th-Century England. Lexington.Google Scholar
Morton, T. (2011) “Sublime Objects,” Speculations: A Journal of Speculative Realism vol. 2: 207–27.Google Scholar
Morton, T. (2013) Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Most, G. (2012) “The Sublime, Today?,” in Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism, ed. Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H.. New York. 239–66.Google Scholar
Münscher, K. (1920) Xenophon in der griechisch-römischen Literatur. Philologus. Supplementband, 13.2. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mutschmann, H. (1917) “Das Genesiscitat in der Schrift Περὶ ὕψους,” Hermes vol. 52, no. 2: 161–200.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. (1994) Ovid's Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nachmanson, E. (1941) Der griechische Buchtitel: Einige Beobachtungen. Göteborg. (Repr. Darmstadt, 1969.)Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1990) Pindar's Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassal, F. (1910) “Aesthetisch-rhetorische Beziehungen zwischen Dionysius von Halicarnass und Cicero.” Diss., Tübingen.Google Scholar
Neer, R. (2010) The Emergence of the Classical Style in Greek Sculpture. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehamas, A. (2007) Only a Promise of Happiness: The Place of Beauty in a World of Art. Princeton.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2004) “Georgics 2.458–542: Virgil, Aratus and Empedocles.” In Dictynna, 1. Université Charles de Gaulle, Lille 3. http://dictynna.revues.org/161 (Accessed 20 September 2013.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, N. J. (2005) Aristocracy and Athletics in Archaic and Classical Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nicolson, M. H. (1963) Mountain Gloom and Mountain Glory: The Development of the Aesthetics of the Infinite. New York.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1967) The Will to Power. Trans. Kaufmann, Walter and Hollingdale, R. J.. New York.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (2004) Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in its Cultural Context. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (2007) “Night-Vision: Epicurean Eschatology,” Arion vol. 14, no. 3: 61–98.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1923) Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöser Rede. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2009) The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, D. (1996) “Plotinus on Matter and Evil,” in The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, ed. Gerson, L. P.. Cambridge. 171–95.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, N. (1992) Alcidamas, Aristophanes, and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory. Hermes Einzelschriften, vol. 60. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, N. (1997) “Caecilius, the ‘Canons’ of Writers, and the Origins of Atticism,” in Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, ed. Dominik, W. J.. London. 32–49.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (2011) “Empedocles and Hellenistic Editions of the Presocratics,” Unpublished talk, Fondation Hardt, Geneva, 14 October 2011.Google Scholar
Oder, E. (1899) Ein angebliches Bruchstück Democrits über die Entdeckung unterirdischer Quellen. Philologus. Supplementband, vol. 7. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. (1987) Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Otto, P. (1906) “Quaestiones selectae ad libellum qui est Περὶ ὕψους spectantes.” Diss., Kiel.Google Scholar
Overbeck, J. A. (1868) Die antiken Schriftquellen zur Geschichte der bildenden Künste bei den Griechen. Leipzig. (Repr. Hildesheim, 1959.)Google Scholar
Paine, T. (1795) The Age of Reason. Part the Second. Being an Investigation of True and of Fabulous Theology. London.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1979 [1946]) Abbot Suger on the Abbey Church of St.-Denis and its Art Treasures, ed. Panofsky-Soergel, G.. 2nd edn. Princeton.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S. (2013) Michael Psellos: Rhetoric and Authorship in Byzantium. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, D. (2014) “The Hebrew Roots of Sublimity,” Seminar Paper, “Longinus and the Sublime” Seminar, UCLA Spring 2014.Google Scholar
Passannante, G. (2011) The Lucretian Renaissance: Philology and the Afterlife of Tradition. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patillon, M. (ed.) (2002) Pseudo-Aelius Aristide, Arts rhétoriques: Livre 1, Le discours politique. Paris.Google Scholar
Patillon, M., and Brisson, L. (eds.) (2001) Longin: Fragments. Art rhétorique. Rufus: Art rhétorique. Paris.Google Scholar
Patterson, A. M. (1970) Hermogenes and the Renaissance: Seven Ideas of Style. Princeton.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. (2006) L'ombre du tigre: Recherches sur la réception de Démosthène. Naples.Google Scholar
Petit, P. (1683) Selectorum poematum libri duo: Accessit dissertatio de furore poetico. 2 vols. in 1. Paris.Google Scholar
Petrarch, F. (1985) Selections from the Canzoniere and Other Works. Trans. Musa, M.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, J. (2001) Contemplatio Caeli: Untersuchungen zum Motiv der Himmelsbetrachtung in lateinischen Texten der Antike und des Mittelalters. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Pfister, F. (1959) “Ekstase,” in Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, ed. Klauser, T.. iv: 945–88.Google Scholar
Philippson, R. (1925) “Zu Περὶ ὕψους,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie vol. 74: 267–79.Google Scholar
Philippson, R. (1943) “Papyrus Herculanensis 831,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 64, no. 2: 148–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ploeg, S. M. (2006) “Staged Experiences: Architecture and Rhetoric in the Work of Sir Henry Wotton, Nicholas Hawksmoor and Sir John Vanbrugh.” Diss., Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
Pohl, K. (1968) “Die Lehre von den drei Wortfügungsarten: Untersuchungen zu Dionysios von Halikarnaß, De compositione verborum.” Diss., Eberhardt-Karls-Universität zu Tübingen.Google Scholar
Poland, L. (1990) “The Bible and the Rhetorical Sublime,” in The Bible as Rhetoric: Studies in Biblical Persuasion and Credibility, ed. Warner, M.. London. 29–50.Google Scholar
Poliakoff, M. (1980) “Nectar, Springs, and the Sea: Critical Terminology in Pindar and Callimachus,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik vol. 39: 41–7.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (1974) The Ancient View of Greek Art: Criticism, History, and Terminology. New Haven.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. (ed.) (2005) Eraclito, Questioni omeriche: Sulle allegorie di Omero in merito agli dèi. Pisa.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1986) “The Material Sublime: Towards a Reconstruction of Materialist Critical Discourse and Aesthetics in Antiquity.” Diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1992) “Hermeneutic Lines and Circles: Aristarchus and Crates on Homeric Exegesis,” in Homer's Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic's Earliest Exegetes, ed. Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J.. Princeton. 67–114.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1993) “The Seductions of Gorgias,” Classical Antiquity vol. 12, no. 2: 267–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1995a) “οἱ κριτικοί: A Reassessment,” in Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honour of D. M. Schenkeveld, ed. Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R. and Sluiter, I.. Amsterdam. 83–109.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1995b) “Content and Form in Philodemus: The History of an Evasion,” in Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, ed. Obbink, D.. New York. 97–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1997) “Aristotle and Specular Regimes: The Theater of Philosophical Discourse,” in Sites of Vision: The Discursive Construction of Sight in the History of Philosophy, ed. Kleinberg-Levin, D. M.. Cambridge, MA. 93–115.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2001a) “Des sons qu'on ne peut entendre: Ciceron, les ‘kritikoi’ et la tradition du sublime dans la critique littéraire,” in Cicéron et Philodème: La polémique en philosophie, ed. Auvray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D.. Paris. 315–41.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2001b) “Ideals and Ruins: Pausanias, Longinus, and the Second Sophistic,” in Pausanias: Travel and Memory in Roman Greece, ed. Alcock, S. E., Cherry, J. F. and Elsner, J.. New York. 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2002) “φυσιολογεῖν: Nausiphanes of Teos and the Physics of Rhetoric; A Chapter in the History of Greek Atomism,” Cronache Ercolanesi vol. 32: 137–86.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2003) “Lucretius and the Poetics of Void,” in Le jardin romain: Épicurisme et poésie à Rome. Mélanges offerts à Mayotte Bollack, ed. Monet, A.. Villeneuve d'Ascq. 197–226.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2004) “Vergil's Voids,” in Before Subjectivity? Lacan and the Classics, ed. Porter, J. I. and Buchan, M..Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2005) “Love of Life: Lucretius to Freud,” in Erotikon: Essays on Eros, Ancient and Modern, ed. Bartsch, S. and Bartscherer, T.. Chicago. 113–41.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2006) “Feeling Classical: Classicism and Ancient Literary Criticism,” in Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, ed. Porter, J. I.. Princeton. 301–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2007) “Lucretius and the Sublime,” in The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, ed. Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P.. Cambridge. 167–84.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2010a) The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, and Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2010b) “The Materiality of Classical Studies,” in When Worlds Elide: Political Theory, Cultural Studies, and the Effects of Hellenism, ed. Bassi, Karen and Euben, P.. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2011a) “Against λεπτότης: Rethinking Hellenistic Aesthetics,” in Creating a Hellenistic World, ed. Erskine, A. and Llewellyn-Jones, L.. Swansea. 271–312.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2011b) “Making and Unmaking: The Achaean Wall and the Limits of Fictionality in Homeric Criticism,” Transactions of the American Philological Association vol. 141, no. 1: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2012a) “Is the Sublime an Aesthetic Value?,” in Aesthetic Value in Antiquity, ed. Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M.. Leiden. 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2012b) “The Value of Aesthetic Value,” in The Construction of Value in the Ancient World, ed. Papadopoulos, J. and Urton, G.. Los Angeles. 336–53.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2013) “Why Are There Nine Muses?,” in Synesthesia and the Ancient Senses, ed. Butler, S. and Purves, A.. London. 9–26.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2014a) Review of A. Sheppard, The Poetics of Phantasia: Imagination in Ancient Aesthetics (London, 2014). Australasian Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2014b) “Introduction,” in Time, Literature, and Literary History: Selected Essays by Erich Auerbach, ed. Porter, J. I.. Trans. Newman, J. O.. Princeton. ix–xlv.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2015a) “The Sublime,” in A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics, ed. Destrée, P. and Murray, P.. Chichester, West Sussex. 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2015b) “Jacob Bernays and the Catharsis of Modernity,” in Tragedy and the Idea of Modernity, ed. Billings, J. and Leonard, M.. Oxford. 15–41.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (forthcoming) “Old Testament Realism in the Writings of Erich Auerbach,” in Jews and the Ends of Theory, ed. Boyarin, J., Ginsburg, S., and Land, M.. New York.Google Scholar
Portus, F. (1733 [1569]) Dionysii Longini de sublimitate commentarius, ed. Pearce, Z.. 3rd edn. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Post, L. A. (1947) “Aeschylean Onkos in Sophocles and Aristotle,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association vol. 78: 242–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosperi, V. (2007) “Lucretius in the Italian Renaissance,” in The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, ed. Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P.. Cambridge. 214–26.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (2006) “Euripides’ Heaven,” in The Soul of Tragedy: Essays on Athenian Drama, ed. Pedrick, V. and Oberhelman, S. M.. Chicago. 49–71.Google Scholar
Puhvel, J. (1976) “The Origins of Greek kosmos and Latin mundus,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 97, no. 2: 154–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purves, A. (2006) “Falling into Time in Homer's Iliad,” Classical Antiquity vol. 25, no. 1: 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadlbauer, F. (1958) “Die genera dicendi bis Plinius d. J.,” Wiener Studien vol. 71: 55–111.Google Scholar
Quadlbauer, F. (1962) Die antike Theorie der genera dicendi im lateinischen Mittelalter. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte, vol. 241, no. 2. Vienna.Google Scholar
Quint, D. (2004) “Fear of Falling: Icarus, Phaethon, and Lucretius in Paradise Lost,” Renaissance Quarterly vol. 57: 847–81.Google Scholar
Race, W. H., (2002) “Framing Hyperbata in Pindar's Odes,” The Classical Journal vol. 98, no. 1: 21–33.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (ed.) (1901) Demetrii Phalerei qui dicitur De elocutione libellus. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (ed.) (1951) Artium Scriptores: Reste der voraristotelischen Rhetorik. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaft, Philologisch-historische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte, vol. 227, no. 3.Google Scholar
Ransom, J. C. (1941) “Wanted: An Ontological Critic,” in Ransom, , The New Criticism. Norfolk, CT. 279–336.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2008) “La proème des Catharmes d'Empédocle: Reconstitution et commentaire,” Elenchos: 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reale, G. (ed.) (1974) Aristotele: Trattato sul cosmo per Alessandro. Traduzione con testo greco a fronte, introduzione, commento e indici. Naples.Google Scholar
Reale, G., Bos, A. P., Girgenti, G., and Sarri, F. (eds.) (1995) Il Trattato sul cosmo per Alessandro. Milan.Google Scholar
Reesor, M. E. (1960) “The Meaning of Anaxagoras,” Classical Philology vol. 55, no. 1: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Refini, E. (2012) “Longinus and the Poetic Imagination in Renaissance Italy,” in Translations of the Sublime: The Early Modern Reception and Dissemination of Longinus’ Peri hupsous in Rhetoric, the Visual Arts, Architecture and the Theatre, ed. van Eck, C., Bussels, S., Delbeke, M., and Pieters, J.. Leiden. 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renehan, R. (1980) “On the Greek Origins of the Concepts Incorporeality and Immateriality,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies vol. 21, no. 2: 105–38.Google Scholar
Richards, G. C. (1938) “The Authorship of the Περὶ ὕψους,” The Classical Quarterly vol. 32, no. 3/4: 133–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1980) “Literary Criticism in the Exegetical Scholia to the Iliad: A Sketch,” The Classical Quarterly vol. 30: 265–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1986) “Pindar and Later Literary Criticism in Antiquity,” in Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar. Fifth Volume 1985, ed. Cairns, F.. Liverpool. 383–401.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, A. (2003) “A Question of Questions: Peusis, Erōtēsis and [Longinus] Περὶ ὕψους 18.1,” Mnemosyne vol. 56, no. 6: 733–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, W. R. (1897a) “Caecilius of Calacte,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 18, no. 3: 302–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, W. R. (1897b) “The Quotation from ‘Genesis’ in the ‘De Sublimitate’ (ix. 9),” The Classical Review vol. 11, no. 9: 431–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, W. R. (ed.) (1899a) Longinus, On the Sublime: The Greek Text Edited after the Paris Manuscript, with Introduction, Translation, Facsimiles and Appendices. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roberts, W. R. (1899b) “The Text of the De Sublimitate,” The Classical Review vol. 13, no. 1: 12–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, W. R. (ed.) (1902) Demetrius On Style: The Greek Text of Demetrius De elocutione. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roberts, W. R. (1904) “The New Rhetorical Fragment (Oxyrhynchus Papyri, Part iii, pp. 27–30) in Relation to the Sicilian Rhetoric of Corax and Tisias,” The Classical Review vol. 18, no. 1: 18–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robortello, F. (1554) Dionysii Longini rhetoris praestantissimi liber, De grandi, sive sublimi orationis genere. Basil.Google Scholar
Romeo, C. (1979) “Demetrio Lacone sulla grandezza del sole (P. Herc. 1013),” Cronache Ercolanesi vol. 9: 11–35.Google Scholar
Romm, J. (1996) “Dog Heads and Noble Savages: Cynicism Before the Cynics?,” in The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy, ed. Branham, R. B. and Goulet-Cazé, M.-O.. Berkeley. 121–35.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. (2004) “Aristophanes’ Frogs and the Contest of Homer and Hesiod,” Transactions of the American Philological Association vol. 134: 295–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, R. (2013) “Plato on Beauty and ‘Philosophical Synaesthesia’,” in Synaesthesia, ed. Butler, S. and Purves, A.. London. 89–102.Google Scholar
Rothschild, C. K., and Thompson, T. W. (2014) “Galen: ‘On the Avoidance of Distress’,” in Galen's De Indolentia: Essays on a Newly Discovered Letter, ed. Rothschild, C. K. and Thompson, T. W.. Tübingen. 21–36.Google Scholar
Rothstein, M. (1888) “Caecilius von Kalakte und die Schrift vom Erhabenen,” Hermes vol. 23, no. 1: 1–20.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (1986b) “The Argument and Structure of Plato's Phaedrus,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society vol. 32: 106–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruffell, I. (2002) “A Total Write-Off: Aristophanes, Cratinus, and the Rhetoric of Comic Competition,” The Classical Quarterly vol. 52, no. 1: 138–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1997) “Lucretius and Doxography,” in Lucretius and his Intellectual Background, ed. Algra, K., Koenen, M. H. and Schrijvers, P. H.. Amsterdam. 93–103.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (trans.) (1972) Longinus, On the Sublime. In Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, M., eds., Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations. Oxford.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1981b) “Longinus Revisited,” Mnemosyne vol. 34, no. 1/2: 72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D. A., and Winterbottom, M. (eds.) (1972) Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (1994) “Deinotes,” in Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, ed. Ueding, G., Kalivoda, G. and Robling, F.-H.. Tübingen. ii: 467–72.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (1998) Canons of Style in the Antonine Age: Idea-Theory in Its Literary Context. Oxford and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, K. R. (1999) “Toward a New Edition of P. Herc. 831,” Cronache Ercolanesi vol. 29: 17–30.Google Scholar
Santayana, G. (1896) The Sense of Beauty: Being the Outlines of Æsthetic Theory. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schefer, C. (2003) “Rhetoric as Part of an Initiation into the Mysteries: A New Interpretation of the Platonic Phaedrus,” in Plato as Author: The Rhetoric of Philosophy, ed. Michelini, A. N.. Leiden and Boston. 175–96.Google Scholar
Schefold, K. (1992) Gods and Heroes in Late Archaic Greek Art. Trans. Griffiths, A.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1970) “Aristarchus and Ὅμηρος φιλότεχνος: Some Fundamental Ideas of Aristarchus on Homer as a Poet,” Mnemosyne vol. 23, no. 2 (Fourth Series): 162–78.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1975) “Theories of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Works of Dionysius of Halicarnassus,” Museum Philologum Londiniense vol. 1: 93–107.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1991) “Language and Style of the Aristotelian De mundo in Relation to the Question of its Inauthenticity,” Elenchos vol. 12: 221–55.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1995) “The Linguistic Contents of Dionysius’ Παραγγέλματα,” in Dionysius Thrax and the Technē grammatikē, ed. Law, V. and Sluiter, I.. Münster. 41–53.Google Scholar
Schiefsky, M. J. (ed.) (2005) Hippocrates, On Ancient Medicine. Translated with Introduction and Commentary. Leiden and Boston.Google ScholarPubMed
Schiesaro, A. (2003) The Passions in Play: Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, F. (1943-) Schillers Werke: Nationalausgabe, ed. Petersen, J., Beißner, F., Fricke, G., et al., 42 vols. Weimar.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. (2010) Τò μέγα βιβλίον: Book-ends, End-titles, and Coronides in Papyri with Hexametric Poetry. Durham, NC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schironi, F. (forthcoming) “The Best of the Grammarians”: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Schlachter, A. (1927) Der Globus: Seine Entstehung und Verwendung in der Antike. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Schmid, W., and Stählin, O. (1912–24) Wilhelm von Christs Geschichte der griechischen Litteratur, 6th edn. 7 vols. in 3. Munich.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. (1976) Die Erklärungen zum Weltbild Homers und zur Kultur der Heroenzeit in den bT-Scholien zur Ilias. Munich.Google Scholar
Scholar, R. (2005) The Je-ne-sais-quoi in Early Modern Europe: Encounters with a Certain Something. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (1970) Horror ac divina voluptas: Études sur la poétique et la poésie de Lucrèce. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (1983) “Le chant du monde: Remarques sur Astronomica i 1–24 de Manilius,” Mnemosyne vol. 36, no. 1–2 (Fourth Series): 143–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (2004) “Silius Italicus en het Romeins Sublieme,” Lampas vol. 37, no. 2: 86–101.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (2006) “Silius Italicus and the Roman Sublime,” in Flavian Poetry, ed. Nauta, R. R., van Dam, H.-J. and Smolenaars, J. J. L.. Leiden. 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, B.-J. (1999) Titel und Text: Zur Entwicklung lateinischer Gedichtüberschriften. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuhl, P.-M. (1952) Platon et l'art de son temps (arts plastiques), 2nd, rev. and augmented edn. Paris. (1st edn. 1933.)Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (1984) “Tantalus and Anaxagoras,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology vol. 88: 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott-James, R. A. (1930) The Making of Literature: Some Principles of Criticism Examined in the Light of Ancient and Modern Theories, 2nd edn. London. (First published 1928).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. L. (2005) Sublimity and Skepticism in Montaigne and Milton. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1990) “Teleology and Myth in the Phaedo,” in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloqium in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Cleary, J. J. and Shartin, D. C.. Lanham, MA. v: 359–83.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1998) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1999) “The Ideal of Godlikeness,” in Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul, ed. Fine, G.. Oxford. 309–28.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1959) “ὕψος and the Problem of Cultural Decline in the De Sublimitate,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology vol. 64: 121–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. (1987) “Writer as Hero: The Heroic Ethos in Longinus, On the Sublime,” in Stemmata: Mélanges de philologie, d'histoire et d'archéologie grecques offerts à Jules Labarbe, ed. Servais, J., Hackens, T. and Servais-Soyez, B.. Liège. 207–19.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1990) Lucretius on Death and Anxiety: Poetry and Philosophy in De Rerum Natura. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1952) “Echoes of Propertius,” Mnemosyne vol. 5, no. 4: 307–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanzer, D. (2010) “‘Incessu humilem, successu excelsam’: Augustine, Sermo humilis, and Scriptural ὕψος,” in Magnificence and the Sublime in Medieval Aesthetics: Art, Architecture, Literature, Music, ed. Jaeger, C. S.. New York. 51–77.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. (1980) Studies on the 5th and 6th essays of Proclus’ Commentary on the Republic. Hypomnemata, vol. 61. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, A. (2014) The Poetics of Phantasia: Imagination in Ancient Aesthetics. London.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. (forthcoming) “Literary Theory and Aesthetics,” in All from One: A Guide to Proclus, ed. Martijn, M. and d'Hoine, P.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, V. (1965 [1917]) “Art as Technique,” in Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, ed. Lemon, L. T. and Reis, M. J.. Lincoln. 3–24.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. (1909) “φύσις, μελέτη, ἐπιστήμη,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association vol. 40: 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuger, D. K. (1984) “The Grand Style and the ‘Genera Dicendi’ in Ancient Rhetoric,” Traditio vol. 40: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuger, D. K. (1988) Sacred Rhetoric: The Christian Grand Style in the English Renaissance. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, M. S. (1980) “Aristophanes as a Lyric Poet,” Yale Classical Studies vol. 26: 99–151.Google Scholar
Sisko, J. E. (2003) “Anaxagoras’ Parmenidean Cosmology: Worlds within Worlds within the One,” Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science vol. 36, no. 2: 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisko, J. E. (2005) “Anaxagoras and Recursive Refinement,” Ancient Philosophy vol. 25: 239–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluiter, I. (2005) “Homer in the Dining Room: An Ancient Rhetorical Interpretation of the Duel between Paris and Menelaus (Plut. Quaest. Conv. 9.13),” The Classical World vol. 98, no. 4: 379–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1931) “Demetrios Περὶ ἑρμενείας und sein peripatetisches Quellenmaterial,” Hermes vol. 66, no. 4: 241–67.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1932) “Drei Rekonstruktionen zur antiken Rhetorik und Poetik,” Hermes vol. 67, no. 2: 133–54.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1938) “Aristotle and Cicero on the Orator's Playing upon the Feelings,” Classical Philology vol. 33, no. 4: 390–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1941a) “The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 62, no. 1: 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1941b) “The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 62, no. 2: 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1953) “Epicurus on the Growth and Decline of the Cosmos,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 74, no. 1: 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1957) “Lucretius 1.724 and Aetna 1,” Classical Philology vol. 52, no. 4: 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1971) “Parmenides and the Description of Perfect Beauty in Plato's Symposium,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 92, no. 1: 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, (2007) Theological-Political Treatise, ed. Israel, J.. Trans. Silverthorne, M. and Israel, J.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sprute, J. (1994) “Aristotle and the Legitimacy of Rhetoric,” in Aristotle's Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays, ed. Furley, D. J. and Nehamas, A.. Princeton. 117–28.Google Scholar
Stabler, J. (2005) “The Shakespearean Sublime and the Reception of Byron's Writing,” Revue de l'Université de Moncton vol. s.n.: 27–39. http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/014325ar. (Accessed 20 October 2013.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, R. B. (1932) “The Astronomica of Manilius,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 53, no. 4: 320–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, D. (2015) “The Poetics of Sound: Callimachus’ Rereading of Pindar Fragment 70B S.-M.,” Classical Philology vol. 110, no. 2: 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern-Gillet, S. (2000) “Le Principe du beau chez Plotin: Réflexions sur Enneas vi.7.32 et 33,” Phronesis vol. 45, no. 1: 38–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern-Gillet, S. (2007) “Consciousness and Introspection in Plotinus and Augustine,” in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Cleary, J. J. and Gurtler, G. M.. Leiden. 145–74.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. (1993) On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Durham. (1st edn. 1984, Baltimore.)Google Scholar
Stokes, C. (2011) Coleridge, Language and the Sublime: From Transcendence to Finitude. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hamphsire.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1982) “Umblick im Trümmerfeld der griechischen Geschichtsschreibung,” in Studien zur alten Geschichte, ed. Schmitthenner, W. and Zoepffel, R.. 3 vols. Hildesheim and New York. Vol. iii: 169–218.Google Scholar
Strohm, H. (1952) “Studien zur Schrift von der Welt,” Museum Helveticum vol. 9, no. 3: 137–75.Google Scholar
Strohm, H. (trans.) (1970) Aristotle, Meteorologie; Über die Welt. Berlin. (Repr. 1984.)Google Scholar
Summers, D. (1972) “Maniera and Movement: The figura serpentinata,” Art Quarterly vol. 35: 269–301.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. (1990) “La cigale et les fourmis: Voix et écriture dans une allégorie grecque,” Opuscula Romana vol. 18: 7–21.Google Scholar
Sydenham, H. (1637) “Jehovah-Jireh: God in his providence and omnipotence discovered. A sermon preached ad magistratum at Chard in Somerset, 1633,” in Sydenham, , Sermons Upon Solemne Occasions: Preached in severall auditories. London. 119–50.Google Scholar
Taillardat, J. (1962) Les images d'Aristophane: Études de langue et de style. Annales de l'Université de Lyon. Troisième série: Lettres. Fascicule 36. Paris.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (ed.) (2007) Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. Book 1: Proclus on the Socratic State and Atlantis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tasso, T. (1823) “Lezione sopra un sonetto di Monsignor della Cassa,” in Discorsi di Torquato Tasso, ed. Rosini, G.. 2 vols. Pisa. vol. i: 42–60.Google Scholar
Taub, L. (2009) “Cosmology and Meteorology,” in The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. Warren, J.. Cambridge. 105–24.Google Scholar
Telò, M. (2010) “Embodying the Tragic Father(s): Autobiography and Intertextuality in Aristophanes,” Classical Antiquity vol. 29: 278–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telò, M. (2013) “Epic, Nostos and Generic Genealogy in Aristophanes’ Peace,” in Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres, ed. Bakola, E., Prauscello, L. and Telò, M.. Cambridge. 129–52.Google Scholar
Telò, M. (2014a) “On the Sauce: Cratinus, Cyclopean Poetics, and the Roiling Sea of Epic,” Arethus vol. 47, no. 3: 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telò, M. (2014b) “The Last Laugh: Eupolis, Strattis, and Plato against Aristophanes,” in Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy, ed. Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. C.. Oxford. 113–31.Google Scholar
Telò, M. (2014c) “Aristophanes vs. Typhon: Co(s)mic Rivalry and Temporality in Knights,” Ramus vol. 43, no. 1: 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1979) “New Comedy, Callimachus, and Roman Poetry,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology vol. 83: 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, A. (1984) Homer's Iliad: Its Composition and the Motif of Supplication. Hypomnemata, vol. 81. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Thouard, D. (2003) “Kant et Lucrèce,” in Le jardin romain: Épicurisme et poésie à Rome: Mélanges offerts à Mayotte Bollack, ed. Monet, A.. Villeneuve d'Ascq. 265–80.Google Scholar
Till, D. (2006) Das doppelte Erhabene: Eine Argumentationsfigur von der Antike bis zum Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tredennick, H., and Waterfield, R. (1990) Xenophon, Conversations of Socrates. London and New York.Google Scholar
Tröger, G. (1899) “Der Sprachgebrauch in der pseudolonginianischen Schrift Περὶ ὕψους und deren Stellung zum Atticismus, i. Teil.” Diss., Erlangen.Google Scholar
Tröger, G. (1900) “Der Sprachgebrauch in der pseudolonginianischen Schrift Περὶ ὕψους und deren Stellung zum Atticismus, ii. Teil.” Diss., Erlangen.Google Scholar
Usher, M. D. (2007) “Theomachy, Creation, and the Poetics of Quotation in Longinus Chapter 9,” Classical Philology vol. 102, no. 3: 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahlen, J. (ed.) (1910) Διονυσίου ἢ Λογγίνου Περὶ ὕψους: De sublimitate libellus. 4th edn. Bonn. (1st edn. 1867, ed. Otto Jahn.)Google Scholar
van den Berg, R. M. (2005) “God the Creator, God the Creation: Numenius’ Interpretation of Genesis 1:2 (Frg. 30),” in The Creation of Heaven and Earth: Re-interpretation of Genesis 1 in the Context of Judaism, Ancient Philosophy, Christianity, and Modern Physics, ed. van Kooten, G. H.. Leiden. 109–23.Google Scholar
van der Valk, M. (1963–4) Researches on the Text and Scholia of the Iliad. 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar
van Hook, L. R. (1905) “The Metaphorical Terminology of Greek Rhetoric and Literary Criticism.” Diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
van Hook, L. R. (1907) “The Criticism of Photius on the Attic Orators,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association vol. 38: 41–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitanovic, S. (1982) “La place de la mythologie dans la poétique de Boileau,” in La mythologie au xviie siecle: Actes du xie colloque du CMR 17, ed. de Donville, L. G. and Faisant, C.. Marseilles. 25–31.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1950) “The Physical Theory of Anaxagoras,” The Philosophical Review vol. 59, no. 1: 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, K. (2001) “Pious and Impious Approaches to Cosmology in Manilius,” Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici, no. 47: 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, K. (2002) The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, K. (2004) “‘Heavenly Steps’: Manilius 4.119–121 and Its Background,” in Heavenly Realms and Earthly Realities in Late Antique Religions, ed. Boustant, R. S. and Reed, A. Y.. Cambridge. 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, K. (2005) “Aetna oder Wie man ein Lehrgedicht schreibt,” in Die Appendix Vergiliana: Pseudepigraphen im literarischen Kontext, ed. Holzberg, N.. Tübingen. 68–89.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2009b) “Introduction to Robinson Ellis's Aetna,” in Aetna, ed. Ellis, R.. Exeter, Devon. vii–xxvi.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2010) “Literary Theft and Roman Water Rights in Manilius’ Second Proem,” Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici, no. 65: 187–97.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2011) “Manilian Self-Contradiction,” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 104–19.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2013) “Manilius’ Cosmos of the Senses,” in Synesthesia and the Ancient Senses, ed. Butler, S. and Purves, A.. London. 103–14.Google Scholar
Vossius, G. J. (1630) Commentariorum rhetoricorum sive oratoriarum institutionum libri sex, 3rd edn. 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar
Walsh, G. B. (1988) “Sublime Method: Longinus on Language and Imitation,” Classical Antiquity vol. 7, no. 2: 252–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, J. (2002) Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Webster, T. B. L. (1939) “Greek Theories of Art and Literature Down to 400 B.C.,” The Classical Quarterly vol. 33: 166–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehrli, F. (1946) “Der erhabene und der schlichte Stil in der poetisch-rhetorischen Theorie der Antike,” in Phyllobolia für Peter von der Mühll zum 60. Geburtstag am 1. August 1945, ed. Gigon, O., Meuli, K., Theiler, W., et al. Basel. 9–34.Google Scholar
Weinberg, B. (1950) “Translations and Commentaries of Longinus, On the Sublime, to 1600: A Bibliography,” Modern Philology vol. 47, no. 3: 145–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskel, T. (1976) The Romantic Sublime: Studies in the Structure and Psychology of Transcendence. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werenfels, S. (1711 [1702]) A Discourse of Logomachys, or Controversys about Words, So Common among Learned Men, to which is appended A Dicourse of the Meteors of Stile. London. (Translated from Werenfels, Dissertatio de logomachis eruditorum. Accedit diatribe de meteoris orationis (Amsterdam: H. Wetsten, 1702)).Google Scholar
Werner, D. (2007) “Plato's Phaedrus and the Problem of Unity,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy vol. 32: 91–137.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1995) “‘Longinus’ and the Grandeur of God,” in Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-fifth Birthday, ed. Innes, D., Hine, H. M. and Pelling, C. B. R.. Oxford. 335–42.Google Scholar
White, M. J. (2003) “Stoic Natural Philosophy (Physics and Cosmology),” in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B.. Cambridge. 124–52.Google Scholar
Whitman, C. H. (1964) “The Anatomy of Nothingness,” in Whitman, , Aristophanes and the Comic Hero. Cambridge, MA. 167–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2001) Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2014) “Atheistic Aesthetics: the Sisyphus Fragment, Poetics and the Creativity of Drama,” The Cambridge Classical Journal , no. 60: 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, M. (1935) “The Comic Fragments in Their Relation to the Structure of Old Attic Comedy,” The Classical Quarterly vol. 29, no. 3/4: 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiater, N. (2010) “Der utopische Körper: Die Interpretation frühgriechischer Lyrik am Beispiel von Sappho frg. 31 LP,” in Antike – Lyrik – Heute: Griechisch-römisches Altertum in Gedichten von der Moderne bis zur Gegenwart, ed. Elit, S., Bremer, K. and Reents, F.. Remscheid. 23–49.Google Scholar
Wick, C. (2000) “‘The Best of Nature’: Naturphänomene und Naturkatastrophen in hellenistischen Epigrammen,” Unpublished paper presented at The Fifth Groningen Workshop, “Hellenistic Epigrams,” 30 August–1 September.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Möllendorff, Ulrich von (1900) “Attizismus und Asianismus,” Hermes vol. 35: 1–52.Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2003) The Languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek. Oxford.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. (2012) The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca's Natural Questions. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winckelmann, J. J. (1825–9) Johann Winckelmanns sämtliche Werke: Einzige vollständige Ausgabe, ed. Eiselein, J.. 12 vols. in 6. Donauöschingen.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J. J. (1985 [1755]) “Thoughts on the Imitation of the Painting and Sculpture of the Greeks,” in Aesthetic and Literary Criticism: Winckelmann, Lessing, Hamann, Herder, Schiller, Goethe, ed. Nisbet, H. B.. Cambridge. 32–54.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J. J. (2002) “The Intellectual Background of Cicero's Rhetorical Works,” in Brill's Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J. M.. Leiden. 331–74.Google Scholar
Wolff, É. (2004) “L'image de l'Etna dans l'anonyme Aetna,” in Connaissance et représentations des volcans dans l'Antiquité: Colloque de Clermont-Ferrand, 19 et 20 sept. 2002, ed. Foulon, É.. Clermont-Ferrand. 79–84.Google Scholar
Wolfson, H. (1947) “The Knowability and Describability of God in Plato and Aristotle,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology vol. 56/57: 233–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthington, I., Cooper, C. R., and Harris, E. M., trans. (2001) Dinarchus, Hyperides, and Lycurgus. Austin.Google Scholar
Wurth, K. B. (2005) “Decorum, Difficulty, Faith: Afterthoughts on the Sublime,” in Histories of the Sublime: 9–10 December 2005, ed. Madelein, C., Pieters, J. and Vandenabeele, B.. Brussels. 135–46.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. D. (trans.) (1854) The Works of Philo Judaeus, the Contemporary of Josephus. 4 vols. London.Google Scholar
Zelle, C. (1995) Die doppelte Ästhetik der Moderne: Revisionen des Schönen von Boileau bis Nietzsche. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, S. (1991a) Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (1991b) For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. London.Google Scholar
Zuckert, R. (2012) “The Associative Sublime: Gerard, Kames, Alison, and Stewart,” in The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present, ed. Costelloe, T. M.. Cambridge. 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar