Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T01:06:02.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Contemporary Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Frederick F. Anscombe
Affiliation:
Birkbeck, University of London
Get access

Summary

Just as the resurgence of nationalism, religion, and conflict in the Balkans revived Western interest in the Ottoman period of control over that peninsula and sparked speculation about the empire’s legacy there, so the course of Turkish politics since the 1980s has reopened the old question of where “Turkey” (first the Ottoman empire and now the Republic of Turkey) belongs. Is it part of Europe, deserving of admission into the European Union? Or does the revival of Islam in public life, which gives another twist to the idea of “neo-Ottomanism,” undermine all that Atatürk achieved and mark Turkey as enduringly “oriental”? The repeated successes of political parties deemed “Islamic” has provided ammunition for opponents of Turkey’s entry into the EU, to whose arsenal of antiadmission rationales centered on objection to Turkey’s “denial of the Armenian genocide” are now added warnings over letting “Islamic fundamentalism” disrupt the union. Such warnings seem comic in comparison to the question of genocide, not only because the Islam in Turkish politics bears little resemblance to that of countries such as Saudi Arabia that are usually called to mind by the term “fundamentalism,” but also because Brussels would find Turkey’s secular nationalists no easier to manage or manipulate. The EU in its original form bound together six countries that welcomed an institutional brake to nationalism following the experiences of the world wars, but as it has expanded into areas that feel little link or responsibility for the wars (other than as victims), the communal sense of disapproval of overtly nationalist regimes has weakened. Kemalist Turkey would add another member to the growing “awkward squad” of the EU, made up of countries with strong characteristics of prickly state nationalism, including Greece and the former Warsaw Pact countries of Eastern Europe. Turkey has a clear record as part of NATO since 1952, however, proving a consistent, reliable member under both Kemalist and “Islamic” party regimes, despite earning a reputation as a tough bargainer within the alliance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kaiser, Wolfram, Christian Democracy and the Origins of European Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szyliowicz, Joseph, “Religion, Politics and Democracy in Turkey,” in The Secular and the Sacred: Nation, Religion and Politics ed. Safran, William (London: Frank Cass, 2003), 208Google Scholar
Yavuz, M. Hakan, Islamic Political Identity in Turkey (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 60Google Scholar
Karaömerlioğlu, M. Asım, “The Village Institutes Experience in Turkey,” BriJMES 25 (1998), 47–73Google Scholar
Öztürk, Serdar, “Efforts to Modernize Chapbooks during the Initial Years of the Turkish Republic,” European History Quarterly 40 (2010), 7–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankland, David, Islam and Society in Turkey (Huntingdon, UK: Eothen Press, 1999), 6Google Scholar
Belge, Ceren, “Friends of the Court: The Republican Alliance and the Selective Activism of the Constitutional Court of Turkey,” Law and Society 40 (2006), 653–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navaro-Yashin, Yael, Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Gingeras, Ryan, “Last Rites for a ‘Pure Bandit’: Clandestine Service, Historiography and the Origins of the Turkish ‘Deep State,’P&P 206 (February 2010), 151–74, and especially “In the Hunt for the ‘Sultans of Smack’: Dope, Gangsters and the Construction of the Turkish Deep State,” Middle East Journal 65 (2011), 426–41Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Contemporary Turkey
  • Frederick F. Anscombe, Birkbeck, University of London
  • Book: State, Faith, and Nation in Ottoman and Post-Ottoman Lands
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323926.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Contemporary Turkey
  • Frederick F. Anscombe, Birkbeck, University of London
  • Book: State, Faith, and Nation in Ottoman and Post-Ottoman Lands
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323926.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Contemporary Turkey
  • Frederick F. Anscombe, Birkbeck, University of London
  • Book: State, Faith, and Nation in Ottoman and Post-Ottoman Lands
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323926.015
Available formats
×