Book contents
- Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
- Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction: Speech and Society in Comparative Perspective
- Part I Revisiting International Norms
- Part II Dewesternizing Tendencies
- Part III The West as Progenitor and Modifier of Concepts of Free Expression
- Part IV Technologies and Ideologies in Turbulent Times
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
1 - Introduction: Speech and Society in Comparative Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 November 2017
Book contents
- Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
- Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction: Speech and Society in Comparative Perspective
- Part I Revisiting International Norms
- Part II Dewesternizing Tendencies
- Part III The West as Progenitor and Modifier of Concepts of Free Expression
- Part IV Technologies and Ideologies in Turbulent Times
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Speech and Society in Turbulent TimesFreedom of Expression in Comparative Perspective, pp. 1 - 16Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Gey, S. 2005. “Free will, religious liberty, and a partial defense of the French approach to religious expression in public schools,” Hous. L. Rev. 42(2005–2006).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hallin, D. C. and Mancini, P. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunn, J. 2005. “The power of justice, justice as power: Observations on the trajectory of the international human rights movement,” Crisis States Development Research Centre, LSE. Discussion Paper No. 12, September. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/28335/1/dp12R.pdf.Google Scholar
Lyn, C. A. and Atkin, D. J. 2007. Communication Technology and Social Change: Theory and Implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Marvin, C. 1988. When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Electric Communications in the Late Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, A., interview by Esfandiari, G. 2011. “U.S. innovation adviser: ‘Internet freedom is not a regime-change agenda’,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Last modified July 18, 2011. Available at: www.rferl.org/a/us_innovation_adviser_says_internet_freedom_is_not_a_regime_change_agenda/24269090.html.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 2008. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, H. 1976. Communication and Cultural Domination. White Plains, NY: International Arts and Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T., and Schramm, W. 1973. Four Theories of the Press; the Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility, and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar
Stone, G. R. 2004. Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime from the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly 1961. “Draft international covenants on human rights, report of the third committee,” Sixteenth Session, Agenda Item 35, December 5, 1961.Google Scholar
Zetter, K. 2010. “U.S. declassified part of secret cybersecurity plan,” Wired. March 2, 2010. Available at: www.wired.com/2010/03/us-declassifies-part-of-secret-cybersecurity-plan/.Google Scholar