Book contents
- Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
- Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction: Speech and Society in Comparative Perspective
- Part I Revisiting International Norms
- 2 Islam, Human Rights, and the New Information Technologies
- 3 Closure, Strategic Communications, and International Norms
- Part II Dewesternizing Tendencies
- Part III The West as Progenitor and Modifier of Concepts of Free Expression
- Part IV Technologies and Ideologies in Turbulent Times
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
3 - Closure, Strategic Communications, and International Norms
from Part I - Revisiting International Norms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 November 2017
By
Book contents
- Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
- Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction: Speech and Society in Comparative Perspective
- Part I Revisiting International Norms
- 2 Islam, Human Rights, and the New Information Technologies
- 3 Closure, Strategic Communications, and International Norms
- Part II Dewesternizing Tendencies
- Part III The West as Progenitor and Modifier of Concepts of Free Expression
- Part IV Technologies and Ideologies in Turbulent Times
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Speech and Society in Turbulent TimesFreedom of Expression in Comparative Perspective, pp. 41 - 56Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Alexanyan, K., Barasch, V., Etling, B., Faris, R., Gasser, U., Kelly, J., Palfrey, J., and Roberts, H. 2012. “Exploring Russian cyberspace: Digitally-mediated collective action and the networked public sphere,” The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University. Available at: www.scribd.com/document/248071090/Exploring-Russian-Cyberspace-Digitally-Mediated-Collective-Action-and-the-Networked-Public-Sphere.Google Scholar
China Daily 2011. “The fourth UK-China Internet roundtable.” Available at: www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011-09/29/content_13821444.htm.Google Scholar
Clinton, H. R. 2010. “Remarks on Internet freedom,” US Department of State. Available at: www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2010/01/135519.htm.Google Scholar
Corbin, K. 2010. “Net censorship central to US foreign policy,” Datamation, June 11, 2010. Available at: www.datamation.com/entdev/article.php/3887326/Net-Censorship-Central-to-US-Foreign-Policy.htm.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, J. 1969. “Direct broadcast satellites and the right to communicate,” EBU Review 118: 14–18.Google Scholar
DeNardis, L. 2014. The Global War for Internet Governance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, M. 1983. “Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 12(3): 205–35.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, V. G. 2011. “Sites like Twitter absent from free speech pact,” The New York Times, March 7, 2011, p. B4.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, R. 2012. Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. R. 2011. “Open networks and the open door: American foreign policy and the narration of the Internet,” Foreign Policy Analysis 7(1): 89–111.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. R. 2015. Power, Information Technology, and International Relations Theory: The Power and Politics of US Foreign Policy and the Internet. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McIver, Jr., W. J., Birdsall, W. F., and Rasmussen, M. 2003. “The Internet and the right to communicate,” First Monday, December 1, 2003. Available at: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/1102/1022.Google Scholar
Morgan, S. 2016. “Clarifying goals, revitalizing means: An independent evaluation of the freedom online coalition,” Center for Global Publicaion Studies, May 2016. Available at: www.global.asc.upenn.edu/publications/clarifying-goals-revitalizing-means-an-independent-evaluation-of-the-freedom-online-coalition/.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development 2011. “The future of the Internet economy: A statistical profile,” Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, June 2011. Available at www.oecd.org/internet/ieconomy/48255770.pdf.Google Scholar
People’s Republic of China 2010. “The Internet in China,” China.org.cn, June 8, 2010. Available at: www.china.org.cn/government/whitepaper/node_7093508.htm.Google Scholar
Posner, M. and Harris, L. 2011. “Conversations with America: The state department’s Internet freedom strategy,” US Department of State. Available at: www.state.gov.j/drl/rls/rm/157089.htm.Google Scholar
Powers, S. M. and Jablonski, M. 2015. The Real Cyberwar: The Political Economy of Internet Freedom. Chicago, IL: The University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Price, M. E. 2015. Free Expression, Globalism, and the New Strategic Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, M. and Krug, P. 2000. “The enabling environment for free and independent media,” Cardozo Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 27, November 14, 2000. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=245494.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. A. 2011. “Launching the US international strategy for cyberspace,” The White House. Available at: www.humanrights.gov/dyn/launching-the-u.s.-international-strategy-for-cyberspace.Google Scholar
Sidorenko, A. 2010. “Quick overview of Russian blogosphere in 2009–2010,” Global Voices. Available at: https://globalvoices.org/2010/05/13/quick-overview-of-russian-blogosphere-in-2009–2010/.Google Scholar
Sidorenko, A. 2011. ”Russian digital dualism: Changing security, manipulative state,” Institut Français des Relations Internationales, December 2011. Available at: www.ifri.org/en/publications/enotes/russieneivisions/russian-digital-dualism-changing-society-manipulative-state.Google Scholar
Smith, T. 2007. A Pact with the Devil: Washington’s Bid for World Supremacy and the Betrayal of the American Promise. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thierer, A. and Crews, Jr., C. W. (eds.) 2003. Who Rules the Net? Internet Governance and Jurisdiction. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Townes, M. 2012. “The Spread of TCP/IP: How the Internet Became the Internet,” Millennium: Journal of International Affairs 41(1): 43–64.Google Scholar
US Department of State 2015. “Country reports on human rights 2015,” US Department of State. Available at: www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/index.htm#wrapper.Google Scholar
World Conference on International Telecommunications 2012. “Final acts of the World Conference on International Communications (WCIT-12),” ITU. Available at: www.itu.int/pub/S-CONF-WCIT-2012/en.Google Scholar
Zittrain, J. 2008. The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar