Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:07:10.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - “They're Just Too Lazy to Work”: Discrimination in the Labor Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jim Sidanius
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Felicia Pratto
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Because the nature of one's work is strongly tied to one's general perceived worth in society, work will also be an important determinant of one's general well-being and social status. By institutionalizing the differential allocation of various kinds of jobs to different social groups, societies create and maintain group-based social dominance.

In this chapter we examine evidence concerning the second arc in the circle of oppression, employment discrimination. In addition to arguing that disparate outcomes in employment are a major cause of group dominance, this review will enable us to test certain key theoretical hypotheses. First, we will test social dominance theory's (SDT's) prediction that institutional discrimination is systematically directed against women. Second, we will test SDT's prediction that discrimination against subordinate men is greater than that against subordinate women, the subordinate male target hypothesis (SMTH). Third, by surveying studies conducted across as many societies as have been systematically studied, we can then explore the robustness of gender discrimination, arbitrary-set discrimination, and the SMTH across different nations and particular dominance-subordinate relations.

A secondary goal of this review is to examine possible factors that will either mitigate or exacerbate employment discrimination. In addition, this review will allow us to assess other theoretical explanations for employment discrimination, as well as to reveal where further research on employment discrimination is needed. As in the preceding chapter, we will begin this exploration with soft evidence and then progress to increasingly harder evidence of employment discrimination against members of subordinate groups.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Dominance
An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression
, pp. 150 - 177
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×