Book contents
- Half title page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- Glossary
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Introduction
- Part I The social dimensions of privacy
- Part II Privacy: practical controversies
- 5 The feminist critique of privacy: past arguments and new social understandings
- 6 Privacy in the family
- 7 How to do things with personal big biodata
- 8 Should personal data be a tradable good? On the moral limits of markets in privacy
- 9 Privacy, democracy and freedom of expression
- 10 How much privacy for public officials?
- 11 Privacy, surveillance, and the democratic potential of the social Web
- Part III Issues in privacy regulation
- Index
- References
6 - Privacy in the family
from Part II - Privacy: practical controversies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2015
Book contents
- Half title page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- Glossary
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Introduction
- Part I The social dimensions of privacy
- Part II Privacy: practical controversies
- 5 The feminist critique of privacy: past arguments and new social understandings
- 6 Privacy in the family
- 7 How to do things with personal big biodata
- 8 Should personal data be a tradable good? On the moral limits of markets in privacy
- 9 Privacy, democracy and freedom of expression
- 10 How much privacy for public officials?
- 11 Privacy, surveillance, and the democratic potential of the social Web
- Part III Issues in privacy regulation
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Dimensions of PrivacyInterdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 104 - 121Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Allen, A. 2003. Why Privacy Isn’t Everything: Feminist Reflections on Personal Accountability. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Allen, A. 2008. “The virtuous spy: Privacy as an ethical limit,” The Monist 91: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, G. M., Farrell, M. P. and Banerjee, S. 1994. “Family influences on alcohol abuse and other problem behaviors among Black and White adolescents in a general population sample,” Journal of Research on Adolescence 4: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, A. and Koman, S. 1976. “Differential response to anticipated crowding: Psychological effects of social and spatial density,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 526–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauson-Kaas, J., Dzikus, A., Stephens, C., Hojlyng, N. and Aaby, P. 1996. “Urban health: Human settlement indicators of crowding,” Third World Planning Review 18: 349–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, V., Paulus, P. and McCain, G. 1984. “Prison crowding research: The relevance of prison housing standards and a general approach regarding crowding phenomena,” American Psychologist 39: 1148–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouter, A. C. and Head, M. R. 2002. “Parental Monitoring and Knowledge of Children,” in Bornstein, M. H. (ed.) Handbook of Parenting, Vol. III: Being and Becoming a Parent. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 461–84.Google Scholar
Crouter, A. C., MacDermid, S. M., McHale, S. M. and Perry-Jenkins, M. 1990. “Parental monitoring and perceptions of children’s school performance and conduct in dual- and single-earner families,” Developmental Psychology 26: 649–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouter, A. C., Bumpus, M. F., Davis, K. D. and McHale, S. M. 2006. “How do parents learn about adolescents’ experiences? Implications for parental knowledge and adolescent risky behavior,” Child Development 76: 869–82.Google Scholar
Czeskis, A., Dermendjieva, I., Yapit, H., Borning, A., Friedman, B., Gill, B. and Kohno, T. 2010. “Parenting from the pocket: Value tensions and technical directions for secure and private parent–teen mobile safety,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, 1–15.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. and McMahon, R. 1998. “Parental Monitoring and the Prevention of Problem Behavior: A Conceptual and Empirical Reformulation,” in Ashery, R. S., Robertson, E. B. and Kumpfer, K. L. (eds.) Drug Abuse Prevention through Family Interventions, NIDA Research Monograph 177, pp. 229–59.Google Scholar
Duarte, M. 2013. Unpublished interview with Marisa Elena Duarte, Ph.D., on file with authors.Google Scholar
Eaton, N., Kruger, R., Johnson, W., McGue, M. and Incono, W. 2009. “Parental monitoring, personality, and delinquency: Further support for a reconceptualization of monitoring,” Journal of Research in Personality 43: 49–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, J. N. and Booth, A. 1977. “Crowding and human sexual behavior,” Social Forces 55: 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. and Nuttal, C. 1980. “Prison size, overcrowding, prison violence and recidivism,” Journal of Criminal Justice 8: 221–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, T. D., Edwards, N. J., Vorakitphokatorn, S. and Sermsri, S. 1996. “Chronic stress and psychological well-being: Evidence from Thailand on household crowding,” Social Science Medicine 42: 265–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavison, R. 1983. “Information Control: Availability and Control,” in Benn, S. I. and Gaus, G. F. (eds.) Public and Private in Social Life. London: St Martin’s Press, pp. 113–34.Google Scholar
Gross, H. 1971. “Privacy and Autonomy,” in Pennock, J. R., and Chapman, J. (eds.) Privacy: Nomos XIII. New York: Atherton Press, pp. 169–81.Google Scholar
Hare, A., Marston, E. and Allen, J. 2011. “Maternal acceptance and adolescents’ emotional communication: A longitudinal study,” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 40: 744–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kafka, R. and London, P. 1991. “Communication in relationships and adolescent substance use: The influence of parents and friends,” Adolescence 26: 587–98.Google ScholarPubMed
Kerr, M. and Stattin, H. 2000. “What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring,” Journal of Developmental Psychology 36: 366–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livingstone, S. and Bober, M. 2006. “Regulating the Internet at Home: Contrasting the Perspectives of Children and Parents,” in Buckingham, D., and Willett, R. (eds.) Digital Generations: Children, Young People, and New Media. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 93–113.Google Scholar
McCain, G., Cox, V. and Paulus, P. 1980. “The effect of prison crowding on inmate behavior,” Washington DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
McCloskey, H. J. 1971. “The political ideal of privacy,” The Philosophical Quarterly 21: 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathiesen, K. 2013. “The Internet, children, and privacy: The case against parental monitoring,” Ethics of Information Technology 15: 263–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megargee, E. I. 1977. “The association of population density reduced space and uncomfortable temperatures with misconduct in a prison community,” The American Journal of Community Psychology 5: 289–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. D. 2003. “Privacy: Its meaning and value,” American Philosophical Quarterly 40: 215–27.Google Scholar
Moore, A. D. 2007. “Toward informational privacy rights,” San Diego Law Review 44: 809–45.Google Scholar
Moore, A. D. 2008. “Defining privacy,” Journal of Social Philosophy 39: 411–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. D. 2010. Privacy Rights: Moral and Legal Foundations. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. 1972. “Mental and social health and population density,” Journal of Human Relations 20: 196–204.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. 1955. “The Universals of Culture,” in Hoebel, E. A., Jennings, J. D., and Smith, E. R. (eds.) Readings in Anthropology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Woman and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parent, W. A. 1983. “Privacy, morality, and the law,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12: 269–88.Google Scholar
Paulus, P., Cox, V. and McCain, G., 1978. “Death rates, psychiatric commitments, blood pressure and perceived crowding as a function of institutional crowding,” Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior 3: 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porporino, F. and Dudley, K. 1984. An Analysis of the Effects of Overcrowding in Canadian Penitentiaries. Ottawa: Research Division, Programs Branch, Solicitor General of Canada.Google Scholar
Rachels, J. 1975. “Why privacy is important,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 4: 323–33.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. and Gregor, T. 1971. “Privacy: A Cultural View,” in Pennock, J. R., and Chapman, J. (eds.) Privacy: Nomos XIII. New York: Atherton Press, pp. 199–225.Google Scholar
Ruback, B. and Carr, T. 1984. “Crowding in a woman’s prison,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 14: 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. 1968. “The social psychology of privacy,” American Journal of Sociology 73: 741–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spiro, H. 1971. “Privacy in Comparative Perspective,” in Pennock, J. R., and Chapman, J. (eds.) Privacy: Nomos XIII. New York: Atherton Press, pp. 121–48.Google Scholar
Spitz, R. 1964. “The derailment of dialogue,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 12: 752–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Stattin, H. and Kerr, M. 2000a. “Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation,” Child Development 71: 1072–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, A. 2000b. “What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring.” Journal of Developmental Psychology 36: 366–80.Google Scholar
Warren, S. and Brandeis, L. 1890. “The right to privacy,” The Harvard Law Review 4: 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S. 2008. Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods.Black Point: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
- 8
- Cited by