Book contents
- Half title page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- Glossary
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Introduction
- Part I The social dimensions of privacy
- Part II Privacy: practical controversies
- 5 The feminist critique of privacy: past arguments and new social understandings
- 6 Privacy in the family
- 7 How to do things with personal big biodata
- 8 Should personal data be a tradable good? On the moral limits of markets in privacy
- 9 Privacy, democracy and freedom of expression
- 10 How much privacy for public officials?
- 11 Privacy, surveillance, and the democratic potential of the social Web
- Part III Issues in privacy regulation
- Index
- References
9 - Privacy, democracy and freedom of expression
from Part II - Privacy: practical controversies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2015
Book contents
- Half title page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- Glossary
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Introduction
- Part I The social dimensions of privacy
- Part II Privacy: practical controversies
- 5 The feminist critique of privacy: past arguments and new social understandings
- 6 Privacy in the family
- 7 How to do things with personal big biodata
- 8 Should personal data be a tradable good? On the moral limits of markets in privacy
- 9 Privacy, democracy and freedom of expression
- 10 How much privacy for public officials?
- 11 Privacy, surveillance, and the democratic potential of the social Web
- Part III Issues in privacy regulation
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Dimensions of PrivacyInterdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 162 - 180Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Allen, A. 1998. Uneasy Access: Privacy for Women in a Free Society. New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. A. 1999. ‘The Failure of American Privacy Law’, in Markesinis, B. (ed.) Protecting Privacy: The Clifford Chance Lectures Vol.4. Oxford University Press, pp. 139–67.Google Scholar
Benn, S. 1984. ‘Privacy, Freedom and Respect for Persons’, in Schoeman, F. D. (ed.) Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–44.Google Scholar
Brown, M. 2009. ‘PCC Chairman Warns of European Threat to Press Freedom’, 13 January. Accessed from www.theguardian.com/media/2009/jan/13/pcc-chairman-christopher-meyer-press-freedom.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 1993. ‘Freedom of expression’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (3): 207–63.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 2009. Philosophy, Politics, Democracy: Selected Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dacre, P. 2008. ‘The Threat to our Press’, Guardian, 10 November. Accessed from www.theguardian.com/media/2008/nov/10/paul-dacre-press-threats.Google Scholar
Davies, N. 2010. ‘Exclusive: Inquiry over Vanessa Perroncel phone-tapping allegations’. Accessed from www.theguardian.com/media/2010/apr/10/newspapers-phone-hacking-inquiry.Google Scholar
Finkin, M. W. 1996. ‘Employee privacy, American values and the law’, Chicago-Kent Law Review 72: 221–69.Google Scholar
Finkin, M. W. 1997. ‘Discharge and disgrace: a comment on the “urge to treat people as objects”’, Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal 1(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Greenslade, R. 2010. ‘Two Newspapers Apologise to Vanessa Perroncel For Breaching Her Privacy’, Guardian NewspaperMedia. Accessed from www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2010/oct/07/newsoftheworld-john-terry.Google Scholar
Lever, A. 2014b. ‘Book review. response to James B Rule’, Law, Culture and Humanities 10(1): 188–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lever, A. 2015. ‘Privacy and Democracy: What the Secret Ballot Reveals’, Law, Culture and Humanities 11(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendus, S. 2008. “Private Faces in Public Places,” in Kramer, M. H., Grant, C., Colburn, B. and Hatzistavrou, A. (eds.) The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press, pp. 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. D. 2010. Privacy Rights: Moral and Legal Foundations. Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 2005. ‘The Central Question’, London Review of Books 27(3): 12–13. Accessed from www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n03/thomas-nagel/the-central-questions.Google Scholar
Rusbridger, A. 2004. ‘The Fame Game’, Guardian, 27 March, Books. Accessed from www.theguardian.com/books/2004/mar/27/highereducation.news.Google Scholar
Ryan, J. 2005. ‘Letters’, London Review of Books 27(4). Accessed from www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n04/letters.Google Scholar
Shrage, L. 2012. ‘Does the government need to know your sex?’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 20(2): 225–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. F. 1987. Political Ethics and Public Office. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, S. D. and Brandeis, L. D. 1890. ‘The right to privacy: (the implicit made explicit)’, Harvard law Review 4: 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13
- Cited by