Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Joseph’s Hosen, Devotion, and Humor: The ‘Domestic’ Saint and the Earliest Material Evidence of His Cult
- 2 Satire Sacred and Profane
- 3 Urbanitas, the Imago Humilis, and the Rhetoric of Humor in Sacred Art
- 4 The Miserly Saint and the Multivalent Image: Sanctity, Satire, and Subversion
- Conclusion
- Index
3 - Urbanitas, the Imago Humilis, and the Rhetoric of Humor in Sacred Art
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2020
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Joseph’s Hosen, Devotion, and Humor: The ‘Domestic’ Saint and the Earliest Material Evidence of His Cult
- 2 Satire Sacred and Profane
- 3 Urbanitas, the Imago Humilis, and the Rhetoric of Humor in Sacred Art
- 4 The Miserly Saint and the Multivalent Image: Sanctity, Satire, and Subversion
- Conclusion
- Index
Summary
Abstract
Chapter Three explores a range of functions – social, intellectual, devotional, economic, and aesthetic – that humor, satire, wit, and irony could perform in sacred art of the late Middle Ages and Renaissance. These rest upon classical, late antique, and medieval rhetorical theories of humor and laughter in treatises on poetics and in the Latin discourse on rhetoric that emphasize the role of humor in constructing urbanitas and solidifying courtois-oriented socio-economic bonds. The tradition of early Christian irony continued by the late medieval sermo humilis provides another context for understanding what we might call the imago humilis. The chapter refutes notions that humor existed in late medieval devotional or liturgical art solely to appeal to or educate an uneducated lay audience.
Key Words: medieval humor, medieval rhetoric, rhetorical theory, irony, sermo humilis, Saint Joseph
Sacred Humor beyond Edification
The iconographic trends in devotional and ecclesiastical images of St. Joseph may be explained not only with recourse to the functional roles of humor, play, and inversion. Their development and popularity had much to do with the nature of religious practices in the early modern period. Even the most public form of religious image, the altarpiece, was typically commissioned by a member of the laity, and decorated with respect to the laity's salvation and devotional concerns, despite the piece's liturgical function as a prop for the celebration of the Eucharist.1 Thus, even more secularized, comical iconography relevant to Joseph would not be out of place on an altarpiece, whether in a parish church or cathedral. But this fact is not even necessarily relevant to the explanation of humor on a functionally religious altarpiece. Once we accept that humor and play were in fact central to late medieval and early Renaissance religious life for both laity and clergy, and that jokes both obvious and subtle are present in an overwhelming number of religious depictions of St. Joseph, we can begin to see that play and humor are in fact present in many kinds of religious commissions. What we formerly might have considered an artist's weakness – for example, a rather diminutive dragon of unconvincing ferocity held prostrate by the foot of a St. Michael – becomes instead a comical display of the artist's wit in reducing a fearsome demon to an accessory.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Satire, Veneration, and St. Joseph in Art, c. 1300–1550 , pp. 151 - 186Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2019