Adams, Katherine H. 1993. A History of Professional Writing Instruction in American Colleges: years of acceptance, growth and doubt. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University Press.Google Scholar

Alvermann, Donna E. 2004. Adolescents and Literacies in a Digital World. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Angel, Dennis and Tannenbaum, Samuel W. 1976. Works made for hire under S.22. New York Law School Law Review 22, 2: 209–239.Google Scholar

Anson, Chris M. and Forsberg, L. Lee 1990. Moving beyond the academic community: transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication 7, 2: 200–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Applebee, Arthur 1984. Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research 54, 4: 577–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Applebee, Arthur N. and Langer, Judith 2006. The State of Writing Instruction in American’s Schools: what existing data tell us. Albany: Center on English Learning and Achievement at Albany State University of New York.Google Scholar

Asencion Delaney, Yuly 2008. Investigating the reading-to-write construct. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7, 3: 140–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atwell, Nancie 1998. In the Middle: new understandings about writing, reading and learning 2nd ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Auer, John J. 1984. Ghostwriting and the cult of leadership response. Communication Education 33: 306–307.Google Scholar

Avril, Patricia Sanchez, Levin, Avner, and Del Riego, Alissa 2012. Blurred boundaries: social media privacy and the twenty-first century employee. American Business Law Journal 49, 1: 63–124.Google Scholar

Baker, C. Edwin 1989. Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barlow, Aaron J. 2007. The Rise of the Blogosphere. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Bazerman, Charles 2007. Handbook of Research on Writing: history, society, school, individual and text. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bawarshi, Anis 2003. Genre and the Invention of the Writer: reconsidering the place of invention in composition. Logan: Utah State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaufort, Anne 1999. Writing in the Real World: making the transition from school to work. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Stephen R., Rhine, Staci, and Flickinger, Richard 2000. Reading’s impact on democratic citizenship in America. Political Behavior 22, 3: 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bereiter, Carl and Scardamalia, Marlene 1984. Learning about writing from reading. Written Communication 1, 2: 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berninger, Virginia W., Abbott, Robert D., Abbott, Sylvia P., Graham, Steve, and Richards, Todd 2002. Writing and reading: connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities 35, 1: 39–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berninger, Virginia W. and Winn, William D. 2006. Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development. In MacArthur, Charles A., Graham, Steve, and Fitzgerald, Jill (eds.). Handbook of Writing Research. New York. Guildford Press, pp. 96–114.Google Scholar

Bertaux, Daniel 1981. Biography and Society: the life history approach in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Bertaux, Daniel 2003. The usefulness of life stories for a realist and meaningful sociology. In Humphrey, Robin, Miller, Robert, and Zaravomyslova, Elena (eds.). Biographical Research in Eastern Europe: altered lives and broken biographies. Hampshire, England: Ashgate, pp. 39–52.Google Scholar

Bertaux, Daniel and Delcroix, Catherine 2000. Case histories of families and social processes. In Chamberlayne, Prue, Bornat, Joanna, and Wengraf, Tom (eds.). The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science. New York: Routledge, pp. 71–89.Google Scholar

Bezanson, Randall P. 2010. The manner of government speech. Denver University Law Review 87, 4: 809–818.Google Scholar

Bezanson, Randall P. and Buss, William G. 2001. The many faces of government speech. Iowa Law Review 86: 1377–1511.Google Scholar

Bibbs, Maria 2011. “The African American Literacy Myth: literacy’s ethical objective during the Progressive Era, 1890–1919,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, ProQuest 3488549.

Black, Rebecca 2008. Adolescents and Online Fan Fiction. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Boesky, Amy 2013. The ghost writes back. Kenyon Review Online. Winter: DOI 656342.

Bolter, Jay 2001. Writing Space: computers, hypertext, and the myth of transparency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bormann, Ernest G. 1960. Ghostwriting and the rhetorical critic. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66: 284–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bormann, Ernest G. 1961. Ethics of ghostwritten speeches. Quarterly Journal of Speech 67: 262–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosch, Xavier, Hernandez, Christina, Pericas, Juan M., and Doti, Pamela 2013. Ghostwriting policies in high-impact biomedical journals: a cross-sectional study. JAMA Internal Medicine 173, 10: 920–921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowers, Stacey L. Bowers 2006. Privacy and library records. Journal of Academic Librarianship 32, 4: 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braaksma, Martine. A.H., Rijlaarsdam, Gert, and van den Bergh, Huub 2002. Observational learning and the effects of model–observer similarity. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 2: 405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braaksma, Martine A.H., Rijlaarsdam, Gert, van den Bergh, Huub, and Van Hout-Wolters, Bernardette H.A.M. 2004. Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction 22, 1: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandt, Deborah 2001. Literacy in American Lives. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandt, Deborah 2004. Drafting US literacy. College English 66, 5: 485–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandt, Deborah 2005. Writing for a living: literacy and the knowledge economy. Written Communication 22, 2: 166–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandt, Deborah 2009. Literacy and Learning: reflections on writing, reading, and society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Brodhead, Richard 1993. Cultures of Letters: scenes of reading and writing in nineteenth-century America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Brooke, Robert 1988. Modeling a writer’s identity: reading and imitation in the writing classroom. College Composition and Communication 39, 1: 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Richard D. 1997. Strength of a People: the idea of an informed citizenry in America 1650–1870. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Burguiere, Andre 2009. The Annales School: an intellectual history. Trans. Todd, Jane Marie. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Burk, Dan L. 2004. Intellectual property and the firm. University of Chicago Law Review 71, 1: 3–21.Google Scholar

Burke, Peter 2005. History and Social Theory, 2nd ed. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, p. 2.Google Scholar

Burton, Vicki Tolar 2008. Spiritual Literacy in John Wesley’s Methodism: reading, writing, and speaking to believe. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar

Burton-Jones, Alan 2001. Knowledge Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Buss, Kristine 2011. Ghosting authenticity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 24, 2: 159–183.Google Scholar

Carr, Nicholas 2011. The Shallows: what the Internet is doing to our brain. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Casper, Scott E. 2007. The census, the Post Office, and government publishing. In Casper, Scott E., Groves, Jeffrey D., Nissenbaum, Stephen W., and Winship, Michael (eds.). A History of the Book in America, Volume III: the industrial book, 1840–1880. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 178–193.Google Scholar

Chamberlayne, Prue, Bornat, Joanna, and Wengraf, Tom 2000. The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, Alfred 1977. The Visible Hand. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Charmaz, Kathy 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Chartier, Roger 1995. Forms and Meanings: text, performances, and audiences from codex to computer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choi, Stephen J. Choi and Gulati, G. Mitu 2000. Empirical measures of judicial performance: which judges write their own opinions and should we care?Florida State University Law Review 32 (Summer): 107–122.Google Scholar

Christen, Richard S. 1999. Boundaries between liberal and technical learning: images of seventeenth-century English writing masters. History of Education Quarterly 39, 1 (Spring): 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Jon 1997. Copyright law and work for hire: a critical history. Copyright Law Symposium 40: 129–164.Google Scholar

Cogan, Neil H. 1997. The Complete Bill of Rights: the drafts, debates, sources and origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, Daniel A. 1993. Pillars of Salt/Monuments of Grace: New England crime literature and the origins of American popular culture, 1674–1860. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cornelius, Janet Duitsman 1992. When I Can Read My Title Clear: literacy, slavery, and religion in the Antebellum South. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, Edward P.J. 1971. The theory and practice of imitation in classical rhetoric. College Composition and Communication 22, 3: 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cunningham, Anne E. and Stanovich, Keith E. 2001. What reading does for the mind. Journal of Direct Instruction 1, 2: 137–149.Google Scholar

Daniell, Beth A. 2003. Communion of Friendship: literacy, spiritual practice, and women in recovery. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Daniels, Harvey A. 1983. Famous Last Words: the American language crisis reconsidered. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Darnton, Robert 1978. History of mentalities. In Harvey Brown, Richard and Lyman, Stanford M. (eds.). Structure, Consciousness, and History. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp.106–136.Google Scholar

Dehaene, Stanislas. 2009. Reading in the Brain. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Dewey, John 1927. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Doheny-Farina, Stephen 1986. Writing in an emerging organization. Written Communication 3, 2: 158–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drucker, Peter F. 2003. The knowledge society. In A Functioning Society: sixty-five years of writing on community, society, and polity. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press, pp. 147–194.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method (1st Am. Ed.). Trans Halls, W.D.. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dyson, Anne Haas 1997. Writing Superheroes: contemporary childhood, popular culture, and classroom literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Dyson, Anne Haas 2003. The Brothers and the Sisters Learn to Write: popular literacies in childhood and school culture. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Ede, Lisa and Lunsford, Andrea 1990. Singular Texts/Plural Authors: perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Einhorn, Lois J. 1988. The ghosts talk: personal interviews with three former speechwriters. Communications Quarterly 36, 2: 94–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenstein, Elizabeth 1982. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elbow, Peter 1998. Writing Without Teachers, Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Emerson, Thomas L. 1976. Legal foundations of the right to know. Washington University Law Quarterly 1: 1–24.Google Scholar

Emig, Janet 1977. Writing as mode of learning. College Composition and Communication 28, 2: 122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erdal, Jennie 2004. Ghosting: a double life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Eubanks, Phillip 2010. Metaphor and Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fabian, Sarah L. 2010. Garcetti v. Ceballos: whether an employee speaks as a citizen or a public employee: who decides?UC Davis Law Review 43: 1675–1708.Google Scholar

Fielkow, Colleen Creamer 1997. Clashing rights under United States copyright law: harmonizing an employer’s economic right with the artist-employee’s moral rights in a work made for hire. DePaul-LCA Journal of Art and Entertainment Law 7: 218–263.Google Scholar

Fischer, Frank 2009. Democracy and Expertise: reorienting public policy inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, Maisha T. 2007. Writing in Rhythm: spoken word poetry in urban classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, Maisha T. 2009. Black Literate Lives: historical and contemporary perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fisk, Catherine 2000. Working knowledge: trade secrets, restrictive covenants in employment, and the rise of corporate intellectual property, 1800–1920. Hastings Law Journal 52, 2: 441–536.Google Scholar

Fisk, Catherine 2003. Authors at work: the origins of the work-for-hire doctrine. Yale Journal of Law 15, 1: 1–70.Google Scholar

Fisk, Catherine 2009. Working Knowledge: employee innovation and the rise of corporate intellectual property, 1800–1939. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzgerald, Jill and Shanahan, Timothy 2000. Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist 35, 1: 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flaherty, Alice W. 2004. The Midnight Disease: the drive to write, writer’s block and the creative brain. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2004.Google Scholar

Fleming, David 2003. The very idea of a progymnasmata. Rhetoric Review 22, 2: 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, Robert J. 2005. Ghostwriting initiated by commercial companies. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20, 6: 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flower, Linda, Stein, Victoria, Ackerman, John, Krantz, Margaret J., McCormick, Kathleen, and Peck, Wayne C. 1990. Reading-to-Write: exploring a cognitive and social process. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Foerstal, Herbert N. 1999. Freedom of Information and the Right to Know: the origins and applications of the Freedom of Information Act. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Fosko, T.J. 2012. Buying a lie: the harms and deceptions of ghostwriting. University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 35: 165.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel 1988. Technologies of the Self. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Frankel, Oz 2006. States of Inquiry: social investigations and print culture in nineteenth-century Britain and the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Fugh-Berman, Adriane 2005. The corporate co-author. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20, 6: 546–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furet, Francois and Ozouf, Jaques 1982. Reading and Writing: Literacy in France from Calvin to Jules Ferry. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gallegos, Bernardo 1992. Literacy, Education and Society in New Mexico 1693–1821. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Gelfand, Donald E. 2006. The Aging Network: programs and services. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Gillespie, Thomas C. 2002. Let’s stop ghostwriting reviewing officer remarks. Marine Corps Gazette October: 29–30.Google Scholar

Gilmore, William J. 1992. Reading Becomes a Necessity of Life: material cultural life in rural New England, 1780–1835. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar

Ginsberg, Jane 1990. Creation and commercial value: copyright protection of works of information. Columbia Law Review 90, 7: 1865–1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Jonathan 1990. Writing Matter: from the hands of the English Renaissance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, Jona 2002. In defense of ghostwriting. Fordham Urban Law Journal 29: 1145–1187.Google Scholar

Gorski, Andrzej and Letkiewicz, Slawomir 2010. “Medical writing” and ghostwriting as ethical challenges in medical communication. Transplantation Proceedings 42, 8: 3335–3337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Graff, Harvey J. 1979. The Literacy Myth: cultural integration and social structure in the nineteenth century. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Graff, Harvey J. 1987. The Legacies of Literacy: continuities and contradictions in Western culture and society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Graff, Harvey J. 2010. The literacy myth at 30. Journal of Social History 43, 3: 635–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graham, Steve and Hebert, Michael 2010. Writing to Read: evidence for how writing can improve reading. New York: Carnegie Corporation.Google Scholar

Graves, Donald 2003. Writing: teachers and children at work, 20th anniversary edition. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2003.Google Scholar

Gray, James 2000. Teachers at the Center: a memoir of the early years of the National Writing Project. Berkeley, CA: National Writing Project.Google Scholar

Gross, Robert A. 2007. Reading for an extensive republic. In Gross, Robert A. and Kelley, Mary (eds.). A History of the Book in America Volume II: print, culture, and society in the new nation, 1790–1840. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 516–544.Google Scholar

Grow, Brian 2010. As jurors go online US trials go off track. Reuters Legal (December 8). Web.

Hall, David D. 2007. The Chesapeake in the seventeenth century. In Amory, Hugh and Hall, David D., (eds.). History of the Book in America Volume I. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 55–82.Google Scholar

Hall, David D. 2007–2010. A History of the Book in America, Volumes 1–V. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Hardy, I.T. 1987. An economic understanding of copyright law’s work-made-for-hire doctrine. Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 12, 2: 181–228.Google Scholar

Haswell, Janis and Haswell, Richard 2010. Authoring: an essay for the English profession on potentiality and singularity. Logan: Utah State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henry, Jim 2000. Writing Workplace Culture: an archaeology of professional writing. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Herrington, Anne and Moran, Charles 2005. Genre Across the Curriculum. Logan: Utah State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hitt, Jack 1997. The writer is dead. New York Times Magazine, 25 May: 38–41.

Holstein, James A. and Gubrium, Jaber F. 2012. Varieties of Narrative Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, Ursula 2012. Literacy and the Practice of Writing in the 19th Century: a strange blossoming of spirit. Leicester, England: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.Google Scholar

Hutton, Patrick H. 1981. The history of mentalities: the new map of cultural history. History and Theory 20, 3: 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaszi, Peter 1991. Toward a theory of copyright: the metamorphoses of “authorship.” Duke Law Journal 2: 455–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaszi, Peter 1994. On the author effect: contemporary copyright and collective creativity. In Woodmansee, Martha and Jaszi, Peter (eds.). The Construction of Authorship: textual appropriation in law and literature. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, pp. 29–56.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Joseph R., Johnson, Evelyn, and Hileman, Jennifer 2004. When is reading also writing? Sources of individual differences on the new reading performance assessments. Scientific Studies of Reading 8, 2: 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johns, Adrian 2010. The Nature of the Book: print and knowledge in the making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kaestle, Carl 1983. Pillars of the Republic: the common school and American society 1780–1860. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar

Kaestle, Carl, Damon-Moore, Helen, Stedman, Lawrence C., and Tinsley, Katherine 1991. Literacy in the United States: Readers and Reading Since 1880. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Kalman, Judy 1999. Writing on the Plaza: mediated literacy practices among scribes and clients in Mexico City. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Karlsson, Anna-Malin 2009. Positioned by reading and writing: literacy practices, roles, and genres in common occupations. Written Communication 26, 1: 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, Susan M. 1998. The Dynamics of Writing Review: opportunities for growth and change in the workplace. Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar

Keen, Andrew 2007. The Cult of the Amateur: how today’s Internet is killing our culture. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar

Keys, Ralph 2003. The Courage to Write: how writers transcend fear. New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Kirkland, Aaron 2006. You got fired on your day off: challenging termination of employees for personal blogging practices. University of Missouri – Kansas City Law Review 75, 2: 545–568.Google Scholar

Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal 2001. Author-stories: narrative’s implications for moral rights and copyright’s joint authorship doctrine. Southern California Law Journal 75, 1: 1–64.Google Scholar

Lacasse, Jeffrey R., Leo, Jonathan, Cimino, Andrea N., Bean, Kristen F., and DelColle, Melissa 2012. Knowledge of undisclosed corporate authorship (“ghostwriting”) reduces the perceived credibility of antidepressant research: a randomized vignette study with experienced nurses. BioMed Center Research Notes 5. doi: , 5 012, 5:490.Google ScholarPubMed

Langer, Judith A. and Applebee, Arthur 1987. How Writing Shapes Thinking. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar

Langer, Judith A. and Flihan, Sheila 2002. Writing and reading relationships: constructive tasks. In Indrisano, Roselmina and Squires, James R. (eds.). Perspectives on Writing: research, theory and practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 120–146.Google Scholar

Laquintano, Tim 2010. Sustained Authorship: digital writing, self-publishing, and the e-book. Written Communication 27, 4: 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenart, Amanda and Fox, Susanna 2006. Bloggers: a portrait of the Internet’s new storytellers. Washington D.C.:Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar

Lerman, Lisa G. 2001. Misattribution in legal scholarship: plagiarism, ghostwriting, and authorship. South Texas Law Review 42 (Spring): 467–492.Google Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence 2005. Free Culture: the nature and future of creativity. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Lidsky, Lyrissa 2010. Nobody’s fool: the rational audience as the First Amendment ideal. University of Illinois Law Review 2010: 799–850.Google Scholar

Lidsky, Lyrissa and Wright, Robert G. 2004. Freedom of the Press: a reference guide to the United States Constitution. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Lippmann, Walter 1922. Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lunsford, Andrea and Ede, Lisa 2011. Writing Together: collaboration in theory and practice. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar

Lyons, Martyn 2010. A History of Reading and Writing in the Western World. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyons, Martyn 2012. Writing Culture of Ordinary People in Europe c. 1860–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machlup, Fritz 1972. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Lucille 1991. A psychiatrist using DSM-III: the influence of a charter document in psychiatry. In Bazerman, Charles and Paradis, James (eds.). Textual Dynamics of the Professions. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 358–378.Google Scholar

McDermott, Patrice 2007. Who Needs to Know? The state of public access to federal government information. Lanham, MD: Bernan Press.Google Scholar

McGill, Meredith L. 1997. The matter of the text: commerce, print culture, and the authority of the State in American copyright law. American Literary History 9, 1: 21–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McHenry, Elizabeth 2002. Forgotten Readers: recovering the lost history of African American literary societies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McHenry, Leemon 2010. Of sophists and spin-doctors: industry-sponsored ghostwriting and the crisis of academic medicine. Mens Sana Monographs 8, 1: 129–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meadows, Susannah 2004. Between the lines. Newsweek 12 January: 12.

Medhurst, Martin J. 1987. Ghostwritten speeches: ethics isn’t the only lesson. Communications Education 36, 3: 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meiklejohn, Alexander 1948. Free Speech and Its Relationship to Self Government. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Migdal, Joel 2001. State in Society: studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Carolyn R. and Charney, Davida 2007. Persuasion, audience, and argument. In Bazerman, Charles (ed.). Handbook of Research on Writing: history, society, school, individual and text. New York: Routledge pp. 583–598.Google Scholar

Miller, Susan 1998. Assuming the Positions: cultural pedagogy and the politics of commonplace writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Milner, Henry 2002. Civic Literacy: how informed citizens make democracy work. Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.Google Scholar

Monaghan, E. Jennifer 2005. Learning to Read and Write in Colonial America. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Murray, Donald and Newkirk, Thomas 2009. The Essential Don Murray: lessons from America’s greatest writing teacher. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Myers, D.G. 2006. The Elephants Teach: creative writing since 1880. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Nash, Ray 1959. American Writing Masters and Copybooks. Boston: Colonial Society of Massachusetts.Google Scholar

National Writing Project and Nagin, Carl 2006. Why Writing Matters. Berkeley, CA: National Writing Project.Google Scholar

Nell, Victor 1988. Lost in a Book: the psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Nancy and Calfee, Robert C. 1998. The reading–writing connection viewed historically. In Nelson, Nancy and Calfee, Robert C. (eds.). The Reading–Writing Connection: ninety-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education Part II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar

Neuborne, Burt 1989. First Amendment and government regulation of capital markets. Brooklyn Law Review 55, 1: 5–64.Google Scholar

Nichols, Marie Hocmuth 1963. Ghostwriting: implications for public address. In Rhetoric and Criticism. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, pp. 35–48.Google Scholar

Niles-Yokum, Kelly and Wagner, Donna L. 2011. The Aging Networks: a guide to programs and services. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Nimmer, Melville B. 1970. Does copyright abridge the First Amendment guarantees of free speech and press?UCLA Law Journal 17, 6 : 1180–1204.Google Scholar

Nord, David Paul and Richardson, John V. 2009. US government publishing in the postwar era. In Paul Nord, David, Shelley Rubin, Joan, and Schudson, Michael (eds.). A History of the Book in America, Volume V: the enduring book: print culture in postwar America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 167–180.Google Scholar

Norton, Helen 2003–2004. Not for attribution: government’s interest in protecting the integrity of its own expression. University of California – Davis Law Review 37: 1317–1350.Google Scholar

Norton, Helen 2008. Government workers and government speech. First Amendment Law Review 7, 1: 75–91Google Scholar

Norton, Helen 2009. Constraining public employee speech: government’s control of its workers’ speech to protect its own expression. Duke Law Journal 59, 1: 1–68.Google Scholar

Oatley, Keith 2011. Such Stuff as Dreams: the psychology of fiction. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orbach, Barak Y. 2009. “The Law and Economics of Creativity at the Workplace.” Discussion Paper 356. Center for Law, Economics, and Business. Harvard Law School. Web.

Orren, Karen 1991. Belated Feudalism: labor, the law, and liberal development in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pare, Anthony 1993. Discourse regulations and the production of knowledge. In Spilka, Rachel (ed.). Writing in the Workplace: new research perspectives. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 111–123.Google Scholar

Pare, Anthony 2002. Genre and identity: individuals, institutions, and ideology. In Coe, Richard M., Lingard, Lorelei, and Teslenko, Tatiana (eds.). The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 57–72.Google Scholar

Pennebaker, James W. 1997. Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science 8, 3: 162–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennebaker, James W. and Chung, Cindy K. 2006. Expressive writing, emotional upheaval and health. In Friedman, Howard S. and Cohen Silver, Roxanne (eds.). Foundations of Health Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 263–284.Google Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Porat, Marc Uri 1977. The Information Economy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar

Prose, Francine 2007. Reading Like a Writer: a guide for people who love books and for those who want to write them. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Riessman, Catherine Kohler 2007. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Rijlaarsdam, Gert, Braaksma, Martine, Couzijn, Michel, Janssen, Tanja, Kieft, Marleen, Raedts, Mariet, van Steendam, Elke, Toorenaar, Anne, and van den Berg, Huub 2009. The role of readers in writing development: writing students bringing their texts to the test. In Beard, Roger, Myhill, Debra, Riley, Jeni, and Nystrand, Martin (eds.). Sage Handbook of Writing Development. Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 436–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riley, Linda and Brown, Stuart C. 1996. Crafting a public image: an empirical study of the ethics of ghostwriting. Journal of Business Ethics 15, 7: 711–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robbins, Ira P. 2010. Ghostwriting: filling in the gaps of pro se prisoners’ access to the courts. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 23, 2: 271–321.Google Scholar

Rose, Mark 1995. Authors and Owners: the invention of copyright. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Scott 2010. Say Everything: how blogging began, what it is becoming, and why it matters. New York: Crown Publishing.Google Scholar

Rothermich, John C. 1999. Ethical and procedural implications of ghostwriting for pro se litigants: toward increased access to civil justice. Fordham Law Review 67: 2687–2729.Google Scholar

Rubin, Joan Shelley 2007. Songs Of Ourselves: the uses of poetry in America. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saunders, David and Hunter, Ian 1991. Lessons from the literatory: how to historicize authorship. Critical Inquiry 17, 2: 479–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. 2004. The boundaries of the First Amendment: a preliminary exploration of constitutional salience. Harvard Law Review 117, 6: 1765–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schemo, Diana Jean 2006. Schoolbooks are given Fs in originality. New York Times 13 July: A1, A21.Google Scholar

Schryer, Catherine F. 1994. The lab vs. the clinic: sites of competing genres. In Freedman, Aviva and Medway, Peter (eds.). Genre in the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 105–124.Google Scholar

Schultz, Vicki 2000. Life’s work. Columbia Law Review 100, 7: 1881–1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Seavey, Charles A. and Sloat, Caroline F. 2009. The government as publisher. In Kaestle, Carl and Radway, Janice A. (eds.). A History of the Book in America, Volume IV: print in motion: the expansion of publishing and reading in the United States, 1880–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 260–275.Google Scholar

Selfe, Cynthia L. and Hawisher, Gail 2004. Literate Lives in the Information Age: narratives of literacy from the United States. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Shirky, Clay 2009. Here Comes Everybody: the power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Shooman, Jeffrey 2005–2006. The speech of public employees outside the workplace: towards a new framework. Seton Hall Law Review 16: 1341–1371.Google Scholar

Sicherman, Barbara 2010. Well Read Lives: how books inspired a generation of American Women. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Slack, Jennifer D., Miller, David J., and Doak, Jeffrey 2006. The technical communicator as author: meaning, power, authority. In Scott, J. Blake, Longo, Bernadette, and Willis, Katherine V. (eds.). Critical Power Tools. Albany, NY: State University of Albany Press, pp. 25–46.Google Scholar

Smith, Donald K. 1961. Ghostwritten speeches. Quarterly Journal of Speech 67: 417–420.Google Scholar

Soltow, Lee and Stevens, Edward 1981. The Rise of Literacy and the Common School in the United States: a socioeconomic analysis to 1876. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Somers-Willett, Susan 2009. The Cultural Politics of Slam Poetry: race, identity, and the performance of popular verse in America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spinuzzi, Clay 2003. Tracing Genres Through Organizations: a sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Starr, Paul 2004. The Creation of the Media. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

St. Clair, William 2004. The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stevens, Edward W. 1988. Literacy, Law and Social Order. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Stewart, Thomas A. 1998. Intellectual Capital: the new wealth of organizations. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Stotsky, Sandra 1983. Research on reading/writing relationships: a synthesis and suggested directions. Language Arts 60, 5: 627–642.Google Scholar

Surrency, Edwin C. 1981. Law reports in the United States. American Journal of Legal History 25, 1: 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swank, Drew A. 2005. In defense of rules and roles: the need to curb extreme forms of pro se assistance and accommodation in litigation. American Law Review 54, 5: 1537–1591.Google Scholar

Tendler, Joseph 2013. Opponents of the Annales School. London: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Clive 2013a. How successful networks nurture good ideas. Wired Magazine 21, 10. Web.Google Scholar

Thompson, Clive 2013b. Smarter Than You Think: how technology is changing our minds for the better. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Tierney, Robert and Shanahan, Timothy 1991. Research on the reading–writing relationship: interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In Barr, Rebecca, Kamil, Michael L., Mosenthal, Peter, and Pearson, P. David (eds.). Handbook of Reading Research Volume II. New York: Routledge, pp. 246–280.Google Scholar

Tierney, William M. and Gerrity, Martha S. 2005. Scientific discourse, corporate ghostwriting: journal policy and public trust. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20, 6: 550–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tomlins, Christopher L. 1993. Law, Labor, and Ideology in the Early American Republic. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomlinson, Barbara 2005. Authors on Writing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torrance, Nancy and Olson, David 2009. Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tussey, Deborah 2007. Employers as authors: copyrights in works made for hire. In Yu, Peter K. (ed.). Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: issues and practices in the digital age, Volume I. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 71–92.Google Scholar

Tussman, Joseph 1977. Government and the Mind. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Veit, Helen E., Bowling, Kenneth R., and Bangs Bickford, Charlene 1991. Creating the Bill of Rights: the documentary record from the First Federal Congress. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

VerSteeg, Russ 1996. Defining “Author” for purposes of copyright. American University Law Review 45: 1323–1366.Google Scholar

Waples, Douglas, Berelson, Bernard, and Bradshaw, Franklyn R. 1940. What Reading Does to People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Walter, David L. 2003. Ghostwriters In the Sky. American Journal of Family Law 17, 2: 61–63.Google Scholar

Warner, Michael 1992. The Letters of the Republic: publication and the public sphere in eighteenth-century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Ronald 1997. Hired Pens: professional writers in America’s golden age of print. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

Weeman, Lauren A. 2006. Bending the (ethical) rules in Arizona: ethics opinion 05–06’s approval of undisclosed ghostwriting may be a sign of things to come. Georgia Journal of Legal Ethics 19: 1041–65.Google Scholar

Wenger, Etienne 1998. Communities of Practice: learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Douglas L. 1999. Jefferson and literacy. In Gilreath, James (ed.). Thomas Jefferson and the Education of a Citizen. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, pp. 79–90.Google Scholar

Winsor, Dorothy 1993. Owning corporate texts. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 7, 2: 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witham, Larry 2000. Ghostwriting haunts Christian publishing. Insight on the News 16, 30: 26–27.Google Scholar

Wolf, Maryanne 2007. Proust and the Squid: the story and science of the reading brain. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Woodmansee, Martha and Jaszi, Peter 1994. The Construction of Authorship: textual appropriation in law and literature. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Wu, Tim 2008. On copyright’s authorship policy. University of Chicago Legal Forum 2008: 335–354.Google Scholar

Wyatt, Ian D. and Hecker, Daniel E. 2006. Occupational changes during the twentieth century. Monthly Labor Review (March): 35–57.Google Scholar

Yates, Joanne 1993. Control Through Communication: the rise of system in American management. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Yen, Alfred C. 1990. Restoring the natural law: copyright as labor and possession. Ohio State Law Journal 51: 517–559.Google Scholar

Yudof, Mark G. 2009. When Government Speaks: politics, law and government expression in America. University of California Press.Google Scholar