Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword: The Harmful Legacy of Lawlessness in Vietnam
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- PART I THE US ROLE IN VIETNAM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
- 1 A Vietnam Settlement: The View from Hanoi
- 2 US in Vietnam: Rationale and Law
- 3 International Law and the United States Role in the Viet Nam War
- 4 International Law and the United States Role in Viet Nam: A Response to Professor Moore
- 5 The Six Legal Dimensions of the Vietnam War
- PART II WAR AND WAR CRIMES
- PART III THE VIETNAM WAR AND THE NUREMBERG PRINCIPLES
- PART IV THE LEGACY OF THE VIETNAM WAR
- Index
1 - A Vietnam Settlement: The View from Hanoi
from PART I - THE US ROLE IN VIETNAM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 December 2017
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword: The Harmful Legacy of Lawlessness in Vietnam
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- PART I THE US ROLE IN VIETNAM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
- 1 A Vietnam Settlement: The View from Hanoi
- 2 US in Vietnam: Rationale and Law
- 3 International Law and the United States Role in the Viet Nam War
- 4 International Law and the United States Role in Viet Nam: A Response to Professor Moore
- 5 The Six Legal Dimensions of the Vietnam War
- PART II WAR AND WAR CRIMES
- PART III THE VIETNAM WAR AND THE NUREMBERG PRINCIPLES
- PART IV THE LEGACY OF THE VIETNAM WAR
- Index
Summary
There are several reasons why I think it useful to circulate this memorandum concerning my visit to North Vietnam in June of 1968:
(1) To describe conversations with leaders of the North Vietnamese government and the National Liberation Front that shed some light on the distinction between “hard” and “soft” negotiating issues;
(2) To convey my central impression that the cumulative attitude of the North Vietnamese government toward the outcome of negotiations accords more closely with official American conditions for peace in Vietnam than has been generally understood in this country;
(3) To call attention to the fact that the North Vietnamese government thinks that it has already backed down from earlier negotiating demands, and seems prepared to take an especially conciliatory position on the central question of the reunification of Vietnam;
(4) To convey a sense of why I think the formation of the Alliance of National, Democratic, and Peace Forces is an important political development whether or not it is a front of the Front;
(5) To convey some impression of the human quality of the political leadership in Hanoi and of the destructive impact that American war policies have had upon North Vietnam;
(6) To report upon the degree to which there remains in North Vietnam an awareness and appreciation of America's own revolutionary tradition and an eventual hope for the establishment of normal diplomatic, economic, and cultural relations;
(7) To give some report on why the leaders of North Vietnam now feel that they were deceived by President Johnson's offer of peace negotiations on March 31, 1968.
This memorandum summarizes my impressions bearing on settling the Vietnam War. Although I have been convinced for some years that the American role in the Vietnam War has been misconceived and improper, I have tried to keep my opinions from shading my report of attitudes and conditions in North Vietnam. One can never be sure that preconceptions have not shaped perceptions, but I have certainly tried to adhere to the canons of objective reportage. The fact that what I report is at variance with what many Americans believe merely confirms my strong sense that it is important for as many of our citizens as possible to go to North Vietnam and see for themselves.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Revisiting the Vietnam War and International LawViews and Interpretations of Richard Falk, pp. 3 - 19Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017