Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:01:19.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - A ppropriating Tet

from PART II - WAR AND WAR CRIMES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2017

Stefan Andersson
Affiliation:
Lunds Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

I guess information ricochet is getting more rapid.

Tom Wolfe

In Vietnam there was a war inside a country in which one side, not the other, was entirely paid, recruited, etc.

Daniel Ellsberg

The Tet Offensive more than twenty years ago was, most agree, a decisive moment in the American involvement in the Vietnam War. But the interpretation of that decisiveness remains murky, obscure, contested. In this essay, my attempt is to explore Tet as a symbolic event, to describe varying interpretations of its military and political impact upon the Vietnam War, and to suggest its legacy for United States Government policy and practice with regard to armed intervention in the Third World.

POINTS OF DEPARTURE

No one has yet addressed the life history of international symbolic events that resonate in the public mind: Munich, Pearl Harbor, Yalta, Auschwitz, Hiroshima. Each name conjures up its own images. The appropriation of the name to impart a particular lesson of history can sometimes shape, even deform, public debate, as well as help establish the societal boundaries of acceptable belief. Relying on symbolic utterance to form policy in place of argument and analysis is a way of closing off the mind to the complexity of reality, including the exclusion of possibly more constructive alternative courses of action.

The Tet Offensive – or simply Tet – is one such symbolic and paradoxical event. But, unlike most of the others, its meaning remains as obscure and controverted as the war of which it was a part. Revealingly, Norman Podhoretz and Noam Chomsky, in the course of comments on the occasion of the tenth anniversary of the fall of Saigon, invoked Tet for their own contradictory reconstructions of what the Vietnam War signified. For Podhoretz, Tet was the moment when the public, Congress, and the media gave up on the war (“Only after the 1968 Tet offensive did that support begin to ebb as people felt the war was being lost, or simply not winnable”). For Chomsky, Tet is invoked not for the event itself, but as a disclosure of American reliance on unrestrained violence in the aftermath of the surprise attack upon US positions (“After the murderous post-Tet pacification campaigns and other atrocities in Laos and Cambodia”). And so it goes, to recall Vonnegut's world-weary refrain in Slaughterhouse Five.

Type
Chapter
Information
Revisiting the Vietnam War and International Law
Views and Interpretations of Richard Falk
, pp. 179 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • A ppropriating Tet
  • Edited by Stefan Andersson, Lunds Universitet, Sweden
  • Book: Revisiting the Vietnam War and International Law
  • Online publication: 28 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108297011.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • A ppropriating Tet
  • Edited by Stefan Andersson, Lunds Universitet, Sweden
  • Book: Revisiting the Vietnam War and International Law
  • Online publication: 28 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108297011.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • A ppropriating Tet
  • Edited by Stefan Andersson, Lunds Universitet, Sweden
  • Book: Revisiting the Vietnam War and International Law
  • Online publication: 28 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108297011.010
Available formats
×