Alesina, A., Bagir, R., and Easterly, W.. 1999. “Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114/4: 1243–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, E. 2010. The Imperative of Integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Arato, A. 2013. “Political Theology and Populism.” Social Research 80/1: 143–172.Google Scholar

Arditi, B. 2008. Politics on the Edge of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Baldwin, K., and Huber, J.D.. 2010. “Economic Versus Cultural Differences: Forms of Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision.” American Political Science Review 104/4: 644–662.Google Scholar

Bartels, L. 2009. Unequal Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bellamy, R. 2007. Political Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Berry, C. 2012. The Rise of Gerontocracy? Addressing the Intergenerational Democratic Deficit. London: Intergenerational Foundation.Google Scholar

Bhargava, R. 2010a. The Promise of India’s Secular Democracy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bhargava, R. 2010b. What Is Political Theory and Why Do We Need It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bherer, L., Gauthier, M., and Simard, L.. 2014. “Autonomy for What? Comparing the Role of Autonomous Public Organizations Dedicated to Public Participation.” Paper presented at European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions, Salamanca, April 10–14.Google Scholar

Bidadanure, J. 2017. “Youth Quotas, Diversity and Long-Termism: Can Young People Act As Proxies for Future Generations?” in Gonzales-Ricoy, I. and Gosseries, A. (eds.), Institutions for Future Generations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bowker, G., and Star, S.L.. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. London and Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brighouse, H., and Fleurbaey, M.. 2010. “Democracy and Proportionality.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18/2: 137–155.Google Scholar

Butler, J. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Canovan, M. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 47/1: 2–16.Google Scholar

Canovan, M. 2002. “Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy,” in Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Chandra, K. 2006. “What Is Ethnic Identity and Does It Matter?” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 397–424.Google Scholar

Chilvers, J., and Kearnes, M. (eds.). 2016. Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Christiano, T. 2008. The Constitution of Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Christiano, T. 2015. “Legitimacy and the International Trade Regime.” San Diego Law Review 52: 981–1012.Google Scholar

D’Eramo, M. 2013. “Populism and the New Oligarchy” (trans. Gregory Elliott). New Left Review 82 (July–August): 5–28.Google Scholar

De La Torre, C. 2016. “Populism and the Politics of the Extraordinary in Latin America.” Journal of Political Ideologies 21/2: 121–139. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2016.1150137.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1988. Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Ezrahi, Y. 2012. Imagined Democracies: Necessary Political Fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Felt, U. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar

Felt, U., Felder, K., and Penkler, M.. 2016. “How Differences Matter: Tracing Diversity Practices in Obesity Treatment and Health Promotion.” Sociology of Health & Illness 39/1: 127–142.Google Scholar

Finchelstein, F. 2014. The Ideological Origins of the Dirty War: Fascism, Populism, and Dictatorship in Twentieth Century Argentina. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Frank, J. 2010. Constituent Moments: Enacting the People in Postrevolutionary America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Fung, A. 2003. “Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy 11/3: 338–367.Google Scholar

García Añón, J., Bradford, B., García Sáez, J.A., Gascón Cuenca, A., and Llorente Ferreres, A.. 2013. Identificación Policial por Per l Étnico en España: Informe Sobre Experiencias y Actitudes en Relación con las Actuaciones Policiales. Valencia: Tirant Lo Branch.Google Scholar

Germani, G. 1978. Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar

Goodin, R. 1988. “What’s So Special About My Fellow Countrymen?” Ethics 98: 663–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., and Lawrence, D.. 2016. “When Lives Are Put on Hold: Lengthy Asylum Processes Decrease Employment Among Refugees.” Science Advances 2/8 (August 3). http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/advances/2/8/e1600432.full.pdf.Google Scholar

Hay, C., and Rosamond, B.. 2002. “Globalisation, European Integration and the Discursive Construction of Economic Imperatives.” Journal of European Public Policy 9/2: 147–167.Google Scholar

Hooks, B. 1981. Ain’t We a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar

Horowitz, D. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2014. Youth Participation in National Parliaments. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kazin, M. 1995. The Populist Passion: An American History. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Keane, J. 2011. “Monitory Democracy?” in Alonso, S., Keane, J., and Merkel, W. (eds.), The Future of Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Keohane, R., and Victor, D.. 2011. “The Regime Complex for Climate Change.” Perspectives on Politics 9: 7–23.Google Scholar

Kneip, S., and Merkel, W. (eds.). In press. Democracy and Crisis: On the Difficult Relationship Between Theory and Empiricism. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. 2005a. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. 2005b. “Populism: What’s in a Name?,” in Panizza, F. (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Lasch, Ch. 1991. The True and Only Heaven: Progress and Its Critics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Levy, L.W. 1994. The Establishment Clause: Religion and the First Amendment. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Mair, P. 2002. “Populist Democracy vs Party Democracy,” in Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Oxford: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Mair, P. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Malik, I.H. 2002. Religious Minorities in Pakistan. London: Minority Rights Group International.Google Scholar

Manin, B. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mény, Y., and Surel, Y.. 2002. “The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism,” in Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Oxford: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Merkel, W. 2014a: “Is Capitalism Compatible with Democracy?” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 8/2: 109–128.Google Scholar

Merkel, W. 2014b. “Is There a Crisis of Democracy?” Democratic Theory 1/2: 11–25.Google Scholar

Mosley, L. 2003. Global Capital and National Governments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mudde, C. 2001. “In the Name of the Peasantry, the Proletariat, and the People: Populisms in Eastern Europe.” East European Politics and Societies 15/1: 33–53.Google Scholar

Mueller, J.-W. 2011. Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth Century Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Narlikar, A. 2012. “Collective Agency, Systemic Consequences: Bargaining Coalitions in the WTO,” in Narlikar, A., Daunton, M., and Stern, R. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

OSJI (Open Society Justice Initiative). 2009. Ethnic Profiling in the European Union: Pervasive, Ineffective, and Discriminator. New York: Open Society Foundations.Google Scholar

Ottinger, G., and Cohen, B.R. (eds.). 2011. Technoscience and Environmental Justice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pogrebinschi, T. 2012. “Participation as Representation. Democratic Policymaking in Brazil,” in Cameron, M.A., Hershberg, E., and Sharpe, K. (eds.), New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America. Voice and Consequence. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pogrebinschi, T. 2014. “Turning Participation into Representation: Innovative Policymaking for Minority Groups in Brazil,” in Sirianni, C. and Girouard, J. (eds.), Varieties of Civic Innovation: Deliberative, Collaborative, Network, and Narrative Approaches. Vanderbilt Place, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar

Portinaro, P.P. 2013. “Ethnos e Demos. Per una geneaologia del populismo.” Meridiana 77: 47–66.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, P. 2015. Le bon gouvernement. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Rovira Kaltwasser, C. 2012. “The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy.” Democratization 19/2: 184–208.Google Scholar

Ruthven, M. 2002. A Futy for God: The Islamist Attack on America. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar

Scott, J.W. 1988. “Deconstructing Equality-versus-Difference: or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism.” Feminist Studies 14/1: 33–50.Google Scholar

Scott, J.C. 1999. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, G. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Streeck, W. 2014. Buying Time. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Taggart, P. 2000. Populism. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Tilly, C. 2007. Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tormey, S. 2015. The End of Representative Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

UNDP. 2013. Enhancing Youth Political Participation Throughout the Electoral Cycle: A Good Practice Guide. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar

Urbinati, N. 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth and the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Verloo, M. 2017. Opposition to Gender Equality in Europe. Theory, Evidence and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wajcman, J. 2009. “Feminist Theories of Technology.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34/1: 143–152.Google Scholar

Walby, S. 2009. Globalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Weyland, K. 2013. “The Threat from the Populist Left.” Journal of Democracy 24: 18–32.Google Scholar

Wyatt, S., Henwood, F., Miller, N., and Senker, P.. 2001. Technology and In/Equality. Questioning the Information Society. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Young, I. 2000. Democracy and Inclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar