Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T03:22:34.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Luke Bretherton
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Resurrecting Democracy
Faith, Citizenship, and the Politics of a Common Life
, pp. 305 - 424
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

O’Neill, Kevin, City of God: Christian Citizenship in Postwar Guatemala (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Ong, Aihwa, “Citizenship in the Midst of Transnational Regimes of Virtue,” Political Power and Social Theory 20 (2009): 301–07CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James, “On Local and Global Citizenship: An Apprenticeship Model,” in Public Philosophy in a New Key, vol. 2, Imperialism and Civic Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 243–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will and Norman, Wayne, “Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory,” in Theorizing Citizenship, ed. Beiner, Ronald (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995), pp. 283–322Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, rev. ed. (London: Verso, 2006)Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, Modern Social Imaginaries (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Ward, Graham, Cultural Transformation and Religious Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 119–47Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret, “The People, the Masses and the Mobilization of Power: The Paradox of Hannah Arendt’s ‘Populism,’” Social Research 69.2 (2002): 403–22, p. 411Google Scholar
Stears, Marc, Progressives, Pluralists, and the Problems of the State: Ideologies of Reform in the United States and Britain, 1909–1926 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Laborde, Cécile, Pluralist Thought and the State in Britain and France, 1900–25 (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Christopher, “From 1848 to Christian Democracy,” in Religion and the Political Imagination, eds. Katznelson, Ira, Jones, Gareth Stedman, and Goode, Walter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 190–213Google Scholar
Asad, Talal, Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Robertson, Roland, “Global Millennialism: A Postmortem on Secularization,” in Religion, Globalization and Culture, eds. Beyer, Peter and Beaman, Lori [Leiden: Brill, 2007], pp. 9–34Google Scholar
Sigurdson, Ola, “Beyond Secularism? Towards a Post-Secular Political Theology,” Modern Theology 26.2 (2010): 177–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, Luke, Christianity and Contemporary Politics: The Conditions and Possibilities of Faithful Witness (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreier, Peter, “Community Organizing for What? Progressive Politics and Movement Building in America,” in Transforming the City: Community Organizing and the Challenge of Political Change, ed. Orr, Marion (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2007), p. 224Google Scholar
Fulton, Brad and Wood, Richard, “Interfaith Community Organizing: Emerging Theological and Organizational Challenges,” International Journal of Public Theology 6 (2012): 398–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Robert, Jr., Radicals in Urban Politics: The Alinsky Approach (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974), pp. 1–2Google Scholar
Franco, Jennifer Conroy, Elections and Democratization in the Philippines (New York: Routledge, 2001), pp. 119–20Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas, “Governing Cities, Governing Citizens,” in Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City, ed. Isin, Engin F. (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 95–109Google Scholar
Massey, Doreen, World City (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007; repr. 2010), pp. 97–129Google Scholar
Silberman, Charles, Crisis in Black and White (New York: Random House, 1965)Google Scholar
Sanders, Marion K., The Professional Radical: Conversations with Saul Alinsky (New York: Harper & Row, 1970)Google Scholar
Bobo, Kim, Kendall, Jackie, and Max, Steve, Organizing for Social Change: Midwest Academy Manual for Activists, 4th ed. (Santa Ana, CA: Forum Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Pierce, Gregory, Activism that Makes Sense: Congregations and Community Organization (Chicago: ACTA Publications, 1997)Google Scholar
Gecan, Michael, Going Public: An Organizer’s Guide to Citizen Action (New York: Anchor Books, 2002)Google Scholar
After America’s Midlife Crisis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009)
Chambers, Edward T. and Cowan, Michael A., Roots for Radicals: Organizing for Power, Action, and Justice (New York: Continuum, 2004)Google Scholar
Szakos, Kristin Layng and Szakos, Joe, We Make Change: Community Organizers Talk about What They Do – and Why (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Miller, Mike, A Community Organizer’s Tale: People and Power in San Francisco (Berkeley, CA: Heyday Books, 2009)Google Scholar
von Hoffman, Nicholas’s portrait of Alinsky should also be counted within this genre as it is less a biography than an account of organizing itself. Hoffman was the first organizer Alinsky recruited to work with him: Radical: A Portrait of Saul Alinsky (New York: Nation Books, 2010)Google Scholar
Ganz, Marshall, Why David Sometimes Wins (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Horwitt, Sanford D. envisages Alinsky as a defender of and experimenter with U.S. democracy whose “relevance and legacy live on in no small part because he effectively advanced the great American radical ideal that democracy is for ordinary people” (Let Them Call Me Rebel: Saul Alinsky, His Life and Legacy [New York: Knopf, 1989], p. xvi)Google Scholar
Finks, P. David, The Radical Vision of Saul Alinsky (New Jersey: Paulist Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Rogers, Mary Beth’s account of the work of the IAF in Texas (Cold Anger: A Story of Faith and Power Politics [Denton, TX: University of North Texas Press, 1990])Google Scholar
Boyte, Harry C. (Commonwealth: A Return to Citizen Politics [New York: Free Press, 1989]Google Scholar
Evans, Sara M. and Boyte, Harry C., Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America [New York: Harper & Row, 1986])Google Scholar
Betten, Neil, Austin, Michael J., and Fisher, Robert, The Roots of Community Organizing, 1917–1939 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Fisher, Robert, Let the People Decide: Neighborhood Organizing in America (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1994)Google Scholar
Slayton, Robert A., Back of the Yards: The Making of a Local Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca, who analyzes and contrasts differing and interconnected styles of organization, relationship building, and leadership in grassroots and participatory democratic politics in the United States through the course of the twentieth century (Freedom Is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlas, John, Seeds of Change: The Story of ACORN, America’s Most Controversial Antipoverty Community Organizing Group [Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2010])Google Scholar
Kramer, Ralph M. and Specht, Harry, Readings in Community Organization Practice (Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1969)Google Scholar
Lancourt, Joan, Confront or Concede: The Alinsky Citizen-Action Organizations (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1979)Google Scholar
Reitzes, Donald and Reitzes, Dietrich C., “Alinsky in the 1980s: Two Contemporary Chicago Community Organizations,” The Sociological Quarterly 28.2 (1987): 265–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFilippis, James, Fisher, Robert, and Shragge, Eric, Contesting Community: The Limits and Potential of Local Organizing (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Swarts, Heidi’s comparison of the non-IAF networks, ACORN, Gamaliel, and PICO. Swarts locates different forms of community organizing strategies in the context of social movement theory and assesses the contrasting styles of political mobilization that had emerged among the divergent community organizing networks by the 1990s (Organizing Urban America: Secular and Faith-Based Progressive Movements [Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008])Google Scholar
Stoecker, Randy, “The Community Development Corporation Model of Urban Redevelopment: A Critique and an Alternative,” Journal of Urban Affairs 19.1 (1997): 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Herbert and Rubin, Irene, Community Organizing and Development, 2nd ed. (New York: Macmillan, 1992)Google Scholar
Warren, Mark and Wood, Richard, Faith Based Community Organizing: The State of the Field (Jericho, NY: Interfaith Funders, 2001)Google Scholar
Wills, Jane, “Identity Making for Action: The Example of London Citizens,” in Theorizing Identities and Social Action, ed. Wetherell, M. (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), pp. 157–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, Jane et al., Global Cities at Work: New Migrant Divisions of Labour (London: Pluto, 2009)Google Scholar
Greider, William’s Who Will Tell the People? The Betrayal of American Democracy (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993)Google Scholar
Hart, Stephen, Cultural Dilemmas of Progressive Politics: Styles of Engagement Among Grassroots Activists (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterman, Paul, Gathering Power: The Future of Progressive Politics in America (Boston: Beacon Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Smock, Kristina, Democracy in Action: Community Organizing and Urban Change (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Warren, Mark R., Dry Bones Rattling: Community Building to Revitalize American Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fire in the Heart: How White Activists Embrace Racial Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Wood, Richard, Faith in Action: Religion, Race, and Democratic Organizing in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Furbey, Robert et al., “Breaking with Tradition? The Church of England and Community Organising,” Community Development Journal 32 (1997): 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamoul, Lina and Wills, Jane, “Faith in Politics,” Urban Studies 45.10 (2008): 2035–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark R., “Community Organizing in Britain: The Political Engagement of Faith-Based Social Capital,” City & Community 8.2 (2009): 99–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snarr, C. Melissa, All You That Labor: Religion and Ethics in the Living Wage Movement (New York: New York University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael, Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1996), pp. 336–38Google Scholar
Coles, Romand, Beyond Gated Politics: Reflections for the Possibility of Democracy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Stout, Jeffrey, Blessed Are the Organized: Grassroots Democracy in America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Dzur, Albert, Democratic Professionalism: Citizen Participation and the Reconstruction of Professional Ethics, Identity, and Practice (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
de Souza Briggs, Xavier, Democracy as Problem Solving: Civic Capacity in Communities across the Globe (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirianni, Carmen, Investing in Democracy: Engaging Citizens in Collaborative Governance (Washington, DC: Brookings Institute, 2009)Google Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, Militants as Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Fung, Archon and Wright, Erik Olin, eds., Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance (London: Verso, 2003)
Boyte, Harry, “Reframing Democracy: Governance, Civic Agency, and Politics,” Public Administration Review 65.5 (2005): 536–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Civic Agency and the Cult of the Expert (New York: Kettering Foundation, 2009)
Warren, Mark R., Mapp, Karen L., and The Community Organizing and School Reform Project, A Match on Dry Grass: Community Organizing as a Catalyst for School Reform (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Boyte, Harry C. and Fretz, Eric, “Civic Professionalism,” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 14.2 (2010): 67–90Google Scholar
Warren, Mark, “Communities and Schools: A New View of Urban Education Reform,” Harvard Educational Review 75.2 (2005): 133–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, William and Mendenhall, Tai, “Citizen Health Care: A Model for Engaging Patients, Families, and Communities as Coproducers of Health,” Families, Systems, & Health 24.3 (2006): 251–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tattersall, Amanda, Power in Coalition: Strategies for Strong Unions and Social Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Hilmer, Jeffrey, “The State of Participatory Democratic Theory,” New Political Science 32.1 (2010): 43–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyte, Harry, Reinventing Citizenship as Public Work: Citizen-Centered Democracy and the Empowerment Gap (New York: Kettering Foundation, 2013)Google Scholar
Cutler, Irving, The Jews of Chicago: From Shtetl to Suburb (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke, Jane Addams and the Dream of American Democracy (New York: Basic Books, 2002)Google Scholar
Hamington, Maurice, “Jane Addams and a Politics of Embodied Care,” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 15.2 (2001): 105–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamington, Maurice, “Community Organizing: Addams and Alinsky,” in Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams, ed. Hamington, Maurice (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2010), pp. 255–74Google Scholar
Addams, Jane, “The Settlement as a Factor in the Labor Movement,” in Hull House Maps and Papers (Boston: Thomas Y. Crowell & Co, 1895), pp. 83–204Google Scholar
Trade Unions and Public Duty,” American Journal of Sociology 4 (1899): 448–62
Branch, Taylor, Parting the Waters: Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Movement, 1954–63 (London: Macmillan, 1990), pp. 263–64Google Scholar
Payne, Charles M., I’ve Got the Light of Freedom: The Organizing Tradition and the Mississippi Freedom Struggle (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), pp. 70–77Google Scholar
Horton, Myles with Kohl, Judith and Kohl, Herbert, The Long Haul: An Autobiography (New York: Teachers College Press, 1998), pp. 48–50Google Scholar
Whyte, William Foote, Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955), p. 99Google Scholar
Rose, Stephen C., “Saul Alinsky, the Industrial Areas Foundation and the Church’s Millions,” Renewal [March 1968]: 4–9Google Scholar
Prochaska, Frank K., Christianity and Social Service in Modern Britain: The Disinherited Spirit (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Austin, Michael J. and Betten, Neil, “The Intellectual Origins of Community Organizing,” in The Roots of Community Organizing, 1917–1939, ed. Betten, Neil and Austin, Michael J. (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990), pp. 16–31Google Scholar
Lubove, Roy, The Professional Altruist: The Emergence of Social Work as a Career, 1880–1930 (New York: Atheneum Publishers, 1969), p. 180Google Scholar
Reitzes, Donald C. and Reitzes, Dietrich C., “Saul D. Alinsky: An Applied Urban Symbolic Interactionist,” Symbolic Interaction 15.1 [1992]: 1–24)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Paul, Coffey, Amanda, Delamont, Sara, Lofland, John, and Lofland, Lyn, Handbook of Ethnography, new ed. (London: Sage Publications, 2007), p. 19Google Scholar
Schlossman, Steven L. and Sedlak, Michel W. note that for Shaw the issue of recognizing and connecting to a wider social world were important parts of such work (“The Chicago Area Project Revisited,” Crime and Delinquency 29.3 [1983]: 398–462, pp. 419–28)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addams, Jane recognizes this in her own account of the role of the party boss in Democracy and Social Ethics (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2002), pp. 98–120Google Scholar
Snodgrass, Jon, “Clifford R. Shaw and Henry D. McKay: Chicago Criminologists,” The British Journal of Criminology 16.1 (1976): 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Clifford’s The Jackroller: A Delinquent Boy’s Own Story (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Jane, The Death and Life of Great American Cities (New York: Modern Library, 1961)Google Scholar
Shaw, Clifford R. and McKay, Henry D., Juvenile Delinquency in Urban Areas (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1942)Google Scholar
Schlossmann, Steven L. and Sedlak, Michael W., The Chicago Area Project Revisited (Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation, 1983), pp. iiiGoogle Scholar
Alinsky, Saul, “Youth and Morale,” The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 12.4 [1942]: 598–602)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Philip Yale, Labor’s Story in the United States (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2004), pp. 29–33Google Scholar
Zieger, Robert H., American Workers, American Unions, 1920–1985 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986), p. 40Google Scholar
Wirtz, W. Willard, Brief History of the American Labor Movement, 3rd ed. (Washington DC: Department of Labor, 1964), pp. 25–28Google Scholar
Fisher, Robert, Let the People Decide: Neighborhood Organizing in America (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1994), p. 61Google Scholar
Dubofsky, Melvyn and Van Tine, Warren, John L. Lewis: A Biography (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1986), p. 152Google Scholar
Alinsky, Saul, Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals (New York: Vintage Books, 1989 [1971]), p. 9Google Scholar
Alinsky, Saul, Reveille for Radicals (New York: Vintage Books, 1969 [1946]), p. 85Google Scholar
Kazin, Michael, The Populist Persuasion: An American History (New York: Basic Books, 1995), pp. 196–218Google Scholar
Warren, Mark R., Fire in the Heart: How White Activists Embrace Racial Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, Jane, Datta, Kavita, Evans, Yara, Herbert, Joanna, May, Jon, and McIlwaine, Cathy, “Religion at Work: The Role of Faith-Based Organizations in the London Living Wage Campaign,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2.3 (2009): 443–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiner, Ronald, Civil Religion: A Dialogue in the History of Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 249–58Google Scholar
Siedentop, Larry, Tocqueville (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 41–112Google Scholar
The Philosopher and the Provocateur: The Correspondence of Jacques Maritain and Saul Alinsky, ed. Doering, Bernard E. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994), p. 20Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques, Man and the State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951)Google Scholar
Integral Humanism: Temporal and Spiritual Problems of the New Christendom, trans. Evans, Joseph (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1968), pp. 162–76Google Scholar
Alinsky, Saul, “The I.A.F. – Why Is It Controversial?Church in Metropolis 6 [Summer 1965], p. 13)Google Scholar
Stears, Marc, Demanding Democracy: American Radicals in Search of a New Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S., Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Thought [Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006 (1960)], pp. 591–95)Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, William, Torture and Eucharist: Theology, Politics and the Body of Christ [Oxford: Blackwell, 1998], p. 195)Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition [Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975], pp. 156–82)Google Scholar
Evans, Sara M. and Boyte, Harry, Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America (New York: Harper & Row, 1986)Google Scholar
Harvey, David, Spaces of Hope (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000), pp. 124–30Google Scholar
Warren, Mark R., Dry Bones Rattling: Community Building to Revitalize American Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), p. 58Google Scholar
Wood, Richard L., Faith in Action: Religion, Race, and Democratic Organizing in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002), pp. 87–88Google Scholar
Crick, Bernard, In Defence of Politics (London: Continuum, 2005 [1962]), pp. 3–4Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (London: Duckworth, 1988), pp. 33–34Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S., “Contract and Birthright,” in The Presence of the Past: Essays on the State and the Constitution (Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1989), p. 139Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig Jackson, “The Radicalism of Tradition: Community Strength or Venerable Disguise and Borrowed Language?American Journal of Sociology 88.5 [1983]: 886–914)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, “On Violence,” in Crises of the Republic (Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Co, 1972), p. 143Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, On Revolution (London: Penguin, 1977), pp. 166–67Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), p. 198Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W., “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review 48.2 (1983): 147–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, John P. and McKnight, John, Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community’s Assets (Evanston, IL: The Asset-Based Community Development Institute, Northwestern University, 1993)Google Scholar
Miller, Mike, “A Critique of John McKnight & John Kretzmann’s ‘Community Organizing in the Eighties: Toward a Post-Alinsky Agenda,’” Comm-Org Papers 15 (2009)Google Scholar
Stoecker, , “Understanding the Development-Organizing Dialectic,” Journal of Urban Affairs 25.4 (2003): 419–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Mike’s account of the Mission Coalition Organization in A Community Organizer’s Tale: People and Power in San Francisco (Berkeley, CA: Heyday Books, 2009)Google Scholar
Schutz, Aaron and Sandy, Marie, Collective Action for Social Change: An Introduction to Community Organizing (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, M. Elizabeth, Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State, 1877–1917 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), p. 135Google Scholar
Goodwyn, Lawrence, Democratic Promise: The Populist Moment in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976), pp. 309–11Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, On Populist Reason (London: Verso, 2005), pp. 201–08Google Scholar
Sabl, Andrew, “Community Organizing as Tocquevillean Politics: The Art, Practices, and Ethos of Association,” American Journal of Political Science 46.1 (2002): 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, John, “Machiavellian Democracy: Controlling Elites with Ferocious Populism,” The American Political Science Review 95.2 (2001): 297–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, John, The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion, and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Haykin, Michael A. G., Stewart, Kenneth J., and George, Timothy, The Advent of Evangelicalism: Exploring Historical Continuities (Nashville, TN: B & H Academic, 2008)Google Scholar
Noll, Mark A., The Rise of Evangelicalism: The Age of Edwards, Whitefield and the Wesleys (Nottingham: InterVarsity Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Hicks, John D., The Populist Revolt: A History of the Farmers’ Alliance and the People’s Party [Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1931])Google Scholar
Rochester, Anna, The Populist Movement in the United States: The Growth and Decline of the People’s Party – A Social and Economic Interpretation [New York: International Publishers, 1943]Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Frederick, Letters to Americans, 1848–1895: A Selection [New York: International Publishers, 1953], pp. 239Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard, The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. [New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1955])Google Scholar
Ali, Omar, In The Lion’s Mouth: Black Populism in the New South, 1886–1900 [Jackson: University of Mississippi Press, 2010])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, Manuel, The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements [Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983], pp. 61–65)Google Scholar
Postel, Charles, The Populist Vision [New York: Oxford University Press, 2009], p. 142)Google Scholar
Creech, Joe, Righteous Indignation: Religion and the Populist Revolution (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Ganz, Marshall, and Munson, Ziad, “A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States,” American Political Science Review 94.3 [2000]: 527–46, p. 527)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Rhys H. and Alexander, Susan M., “Religious Rhetoric in American Populism: Civil Religion as Movement Ideology,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 33.1 [1994]: 1–15, p. 2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlefield, Henry M., “The Wizard of Oz: Parable on Populism,” American Quarterly 16.1 (1964): 47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffrey A., Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century [New York: W. W. Norton & Co, 2006], p. 48)Google Scholar
Panizza, Francisco, Populism and the Mirror of Democracy [London: Verso, 2005], pp. 1–31)Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2001), pp. 247–49Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael, “For a Sociological Marxism: The Complementary Convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi,” Politics & Society 31.2 [2003]: 193–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canovan, Margaret, “Two Strategies for the Study of Populism,” Political Studies 30.4 [1982]: 544–52)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canovan, Margaret, Populism [New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1981]Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret, “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy,” Political Studies 47.1 [1999]: 2–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (London: Duckworth, 1994)Google Scholar
Bretherton, Luke, Hospitality as Holiness: Christian Witness Amid Moral Diversity (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006), pp. 9–33Google Scholar
Dionne, E. J., Our Divided Political Heart: The Battle for the American Idea in an Age of Discontent (New York: Bloomsbury, 2012), pp. 189–212Google Scholar
Engel, Lawrence, “The Influence of Saul Alinsky on the Campaign for Human Development,” Theological Studies 59 (1998): 636–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alinsky, Saul, “Behind the Mask,” in American Child: Which Way Community Action Programs? 47.4 (1965): 7–9Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret, G. K. Chesterton: Radical Populist [New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977]Google Scholar
Massey, Doreen, World City (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010 [2007]), p. xGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David, A Brief History of Neoliberalism [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005], p. 141)Google Scholar
Spufford, Peter, “From Antwerp and Amsterdam to London: The Decline of Financial Centres in Europe,” The Economist 154.2 [2006]: 143–75)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaxson, Nicholas, Treasure Islands: Tax Havens and the Men Who Stole the World (London: The Bodley Head, 2011), p. 247Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio in State of Exception (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Aihwa, Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006), pp. 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, Reginald R., London and the Kingdom: A History Derived Mainly from the Archives at Guildhall In the Custody of the Corporation of the City of London, III Volumes (London: Longmans, Green & Co, 1894Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987 [1957])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, Corinne, “England: Ancient Constitution and Common Law,” in The Cambridge History of Political Thought: 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 374–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Antony, Guild and State: European Political Thought from the Twelfth Century to the Present (London: Transaction Publishers, 2003)Google Scholar
Atlee, Clement, The Labour Party in Perspective (London: Gollanz, 1937), pp. 80–81Google Scholar
Friedman, John, “The World-City Hypothesis,” in World Cities in a World-System, eds. Knox, Paul L. and Taylor, Peter J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 317–31Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo [Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991], pp. 3–4)Google Scholar
Ellingworth, Paul, “Translating Kosmos ‘World’ in Paul,” The Bible Translator 53.4 [2002]: 414–21)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, David J., “The Word Kosmos ‘World’ in John 17,” The Bible Translator 50.4 (1999): 401–06CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pang, Tikki, Lansang, Mary Ann, and Haines, Andy, “Brain Drain and Health Professionals: A Global Problem Needs Global Solutions,” British Medical Journal 324 (2002): 499–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, Stephen et al., Migration: An Economic and Social Analysis [London: Home Office, 2001], p. 38)Google Scholar
Dale, Gareth, Karl Polanyi: The Limits of the Market (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010), pp. 137–87Google Scholar
Freedman, Samuel, Upon This Rock: The Miracles of a Black Church (New York: HarperCollins, 1994)Google Scholar
Robertson, Roland, Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture [London: Sage, 1992], p. 130)Google Scholar
Robertson, Roland, “Glocalization: Time-space and Heterogeneity-Homogeneity,” in Global Modernities, eds. Featherstone, Mike, Lash, Scott, and Robertson, Roland (London: Sage, 1995), pp. 25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, Manuel, The Power of Identity: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. II, 2nd ed. [Oxford: Blackwells, 2004], p. 160)Google Scholar
Graeber, David, Direct Action: An Ethnography (Oakland, CA: AK Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Porta, Donatella Della, Globalization from Below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Pleyers, Geoffrey, Alter-Globalization: Becoming Actors in the Global Age (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010), pp. 6–7Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. Ritter, Mark (London: Sage, 1992)Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, Giddens, Anthony, and Lash, Scott, Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Gecan, Michael, Effective Organizing for Congregational Renewal (Chicago, IL: ACTA Publications, 2008)Google Scholar
Cortés, Ernesto entitled Rebuilding Our Institutions (Chicago: ACTA Publications, 2010)Google Scholar
MacInnes, Tom and Kenway, Peter, London’s Poverty Profile (London: New Policy Institute, 2009), p. 14Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt, Globalization (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998), pp. 12–26Google Scholar
Soja, Edward, Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions [Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2000], pp. 212–16)Google Scholar
Clark, Nick et al., “Fairtrade Urbanism? The Politics of Place beyond Place in the Bristol Fairtrade City Campaign,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31.3 (2007): 633–45Google Scholar
Massey, Doreen, For Space (London: Sage Publications, 2005)Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages, updated ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008), pp. 314–19Google Scholar
The Repositioning of Citizenship: Emergent Subjects and Spaces for Politics,” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 46 (2002): 4–25
Fisher, Robert and Shragge, Eric, “Contextualizing Community Organizing: Lessons from the Past, Tensions in the Present, Opportunities for the Future,” in Orr, Marion, Transforming the City: Community Organizing and the Challenge of Political Change (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2007), pp. 193–217Google Scholar
Ong, Aihwa, “Introduction: Worlding Cities, or the Art of Being Global,” in Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, eds. Roy, Ananya and Ong, Aiwha (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), pp. 1–13Google Scholar
Warf, Barney and Arias, Santa, The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (London: Taylor & Francis, 2009)Google Scholar
Pickles, John, “Review Article: Social and Cultural Cartographies and the Spatial Turn in Social Theory,” Journal of Historical Geography 25.1 (1999): 93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gereffi, Gary, “Global Value Chains in a Post-Washington Consensus World,” Review of International Political Economy (2013): 1–29Google Scholar
Gereffi, Gary, Lee, Joonkoo, Christian, Michelle, “US-Based Food and Agricultural Value Chains and Their Relevance to Healthy Diets,” Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 4 (2009): 357–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitt, James and Keane, Maurice, Community Organising? The Challenge to Britain from the U.S.A. (London: J & P Consultancy, 1984)Google Scholar
MacLeod, Jay, Community Organising: A Practical and Theological Appraisal (London: Christian Action, 1993)Google Scholar
Craig, Gary, “Introduction,” in The Community Development Reader: History, Themes and Issues, ed. Craig, Gary, Mayo, Marjorie, Popple, Keith, Shaw, Mae, and Taylor, Marilyn (London: The Policy Press, 2011), pp. 3–21Google Scholar
Thomas, George, Revivalism and Cultural Change: Christianity, Nation Building, and the Market in the Nineteenth-Century United States [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989], pp. 78–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKanan, Dan, Prophetic Encounters: Religion and the American Radical Tradition (Boston: Beacon Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Erdozain, Dominic, “The Secularisation of Sin in the Nineteenth Century,” The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 62.1 (2011): 59–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevir, Mark, The Making of British Socialism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazin, Michael, A Godly Hero: The Life of William Jennings Bryan (New York: Anchor Books, 2007)Google Scholar
Hatch, Nathan, The Democratization of American Christianity (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Smith, Ted, The New Measures: A Theological History of Democratic Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Sutton, William, Journeyman for Jesus: Evangelical Artisans Confront Capitalism in Jacksonian Baltimore (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Taylor, , A Secular Age (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2007), p. 451Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel, The Power of Identity [Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1997], p. 8Google Scholar
Marty, Martin E. and Appleby, R. Scott, eds., Fundamentalisms Observed (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991)
Herbert, David, Religion and Civil Society: Rethinking Public Religion in the Contemporary World [Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003], p. 48)Google Scholar
Ruthven, Malise, while recognizing the problems, defends the “family resemblances” approach (Fundamentalism: The Search for Meaning [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005], pp. 1–34)Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel, Appleby, Scott, and Sivan, Emmanuel defined fundamentalism as referring to “a discernable pattern of religious militance by which self-styled ‘true believers’ attempt to arrest the erosion of religious identity, fortify the border of the religious community, and create viable alternatives to secular institutions and behaviours” (Strong Religion: The Rise of Fundamentalisms around the World [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003], p. 17)Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, William identifies as a modern archetype – the religious fanatic – which is then used to reinforce a secularist hegemony (“The Invention of Fanaticism,” Modern Theology 27.2 [2011]: 226–37)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toscano, Alberto, Fanaticism: On the Uses of an Idea (London: Verso, 2010)Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt, “Postmodern Religion?” in Religion, Modernity and Postmodernity, ed. Heelas, Paul (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), pp. 55–78Google Scholar
Antoun, Richard T., Understanding Fundamentalism: Christian, Islamic, and Jewish Movements, 2nd ed. [Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008])Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel, “The Reconstruction of Religious Arenas in the Framework of ‘Multiple Modernities,’” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29:3 (2000): 591–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, Luke, “A Postsecular Politics? Inter-faith Relations as a Civic Practice,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 79.2 (2011): 346–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Simon, The Globalization of Charismatic Christianity: Spreading the Gospel of Prosperity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, David, Pentecostalism: The World Their Parish (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002)Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel, “The Globalization of Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity,” Annual Review of Anthropology 33 (2004): 117–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Kevin, American Theocracy: The Peril and Politics of Radical Religion, Oil, and Borrowed Money in the 21st Century (New York: Viking Press 2006)Google Scholar
Hedges, Chris, American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America (New York: Free Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Shields, Jon A., The Democratic Virtues of the Christian Right [Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009], p. 62)Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde and Robinson, Carin, Onward Christian Soldiers? The Religious Right in American Politics, 4th ed. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2011), p. 148Google Scholar
Bretherton, , “Translation, Conversation, or Hospitality? Approaches to Theological Reasons in Public Deliberation,” in Religious Voices in Public Places, eds. Biggar, Nigel and Hogan, Linda (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 85–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Susan Friend, The Book of Jerry Falwell: Fundamentalist Language and Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael, What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets (New York: Farrar, Status, and Giroux, 2012)Google Scholar
Kuttner, Paul, Taylor, Amanda, and Westmoreland, Helen, “‘Cement between bricks’: Building Schools and Communities in New York City,” in A Match on Dry Grass: Community Organizing as a Catalyst for School Reform, eds. Warren, Mark R. and Mapp, Karen L. [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011], pp. 197–226)Google Scholar
Siddiqui, Ataullah notes, when it comes to other religious traditions, “[t]he fulfilment of revelations to the Prophet Muhammed it seems sealed all opportunities to look even with curiosity at ‘the otherness of the other’” (Christian-Muslim Dialogue in the Twentieth Century [Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997], p. 196)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esack, Farid, Qur’an, Liberation and Pluralism: An Islamic Perspective on Interreligious Solidarity Against Oppression (Oxford: Oneworld, 1997)Google Scholar
Friedmann, Yohanan, Tolerance and Coercion in Islam: Interfaith Relations in the Muslim Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbigin, Lesslie, The Open Secret: An Introduction to the Theology of Mission (London: SPCK, 1995)Google Scholar
D’Costa, GavinChristianity and World Religions: Disputed Questions in the Theology of Religions (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Michael, Theology and the Dialogue of Religions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, Dilwar, “Muslim Political Participation in Britain and the ‘Europeanisation’ of Fiqh,” Die Welt des Islams 44.3 (2004): 376–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaman, Muhammad Qasim, “The ‘Ulama’ of Contemporary Islam and Their Conceptions of the Common Good,” in Public Islam and the Common Good, eds. Salvatore, Armando and Eickelman, Dale (Leiden: Brill, 2004), pp. 129–55Google Scholar
Salvatore, Armando, The Public Sphere: Liberal Modernity, Catholicism, Islam (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), pp. 156–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masud, Muhammad Khalid, “Being Muslim in a Non-Muslim Polity: Three Alternative Models,” Journal of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs 10.1 (1989): 118–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramadan, Tariq, Western Muslims and the Future of Islam (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Muslih, Muhammad, “Democracy,” in Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World, ed. Esposito, John L. et al. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 356–60Google Scholar
Moosa, Ebrahim, “The Dilemma of Islamic Rights Schemes,” Journal of Law and Religion 15.1–2 (2000–01): 185–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Rachel M., The Challenge of Political Islam: Non-Muslims and the Egyptian State (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010), p. 151Google Scholar
Ebaugh, Helen Rose, The Gülen Movement: A Sociological Analysis of a Civic Movement Rooted in Moderate Islam [London: Springer, 2009], p. 42)Google Scholar
An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed, Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights and International Law (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Ivereigh, Austen, Faithful Citizens: A Practical Guide to Catholic Social Teaching and Community Organising (London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 2010)Google Scholar
Gornik, Mark R., Word Made Global: Stories of African Christianity in New York City (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011)Google Scholar
Jameson, Neil, “British Muslims – Influencing UK Public Life: A Case Study,” British Muslims: Loyalty and Belonging, eds. Seddon, Mohammad Siddique, Hussain, Dilwar, and Malik, Nadeem (Markfield, UK: The Islamic Foundation, 2003), pp. 47–48Google Scholar
Stout, Jeffrey, Democracy and Tradition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Goddard, Hugh, A History of Christian-Muslim Relations (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000), pp. 177–98Google Scholar
Siddiqui, Ataullah, “Inter-Faith Relations in Britain since 1970 – An Assessment,” Exchange 39.3 (2010): 236–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickford, Susan, The Dissonance of Democracy: Listening, Conflict and Citizenship (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996), pp. 25–53Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew, Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty and Humanity, new ed. (London: Routledge, 2007)Google Scholar
Miller, David, On Nationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Poole, Ross, Nation and Identity (London: Routledge, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles, “Why Democracy Needs Patriotism,” in For Love of Country? eds. Nussbaum, Martha C. and Cohen, Joshua (Boston: Beacon Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Bookchin, Murray, From Urbanization to Cities: Towards a New Politics of Citizenship, rev. ed. (London: Cassell, 1995)Google Scholar
Isin, Engin F., Being Political: Genealogies of Citizenship (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Beauregard, Robert and Bounds, Anna, “Urban Citizenship” in Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City, ed. Isin, Engin F. (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 243Google Scholar
Jeavons, Thomas H., “Identifying Characteristics of ‘Religious’ Organisations: An Exploratory Proposal,” in Sacred Companies: Organisational Aspects of Religion and Religious Aspects of Organisations, eds. Demerath, N. J., Hall, Peter Dobkin, Schmitt, Terry, and Williams, Rhys H. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 79–95Google Scholar
Asad, Talal, “The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category,” in Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993), pp. 27–54Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, William, The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partington, Andrew and Bickley, Paul, Coming Off the Bench: The Past, Present and Future of Religious Representation in the House of Lords (London: Theos, 2007)Google Scholar
Casanova, José, “Immigration and the New Religious Pluralism: A European Union/United States Comparison,” in Democracy and the New Religious Pluralism, ed. Banchoff, Thomas F. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 63Google Scholar
Shields, Jon, Democratic Virtues of the Christian Right [Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009], pp. 117–46)Google Scholar
Milbank, John, Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993), pp. 25–45Google Scholar
Milbank, John, “‘On Baseless Suspicion: Christianity and the Crises of Socialism,” in The Future of Love: Essays in Political Theology (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2009), pp. 112–29Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal, The Democratic Paradox (London: Verso, 2000), pp. 17–35Google Scholar
Markus, Robert A., Christianity and the Secular (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Adams, Edward, Constructing the World: A Study in Paul’s Cosmological Language (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 2000)Google Scholar
Barth, Karl notes, “‘Why is it that the being of the creature is menaced by nothingness, menaced in such a way that it needs the divine preservation and sustaining and indeed deliverance if it is not to fall victim to it and perish? Obviously it is menaced by something far more serious than mere non-being as opposed to being, although it is of course menaced by non-being too. But what makes non-being a menace, an enemy which is superior to created being, a threatened destroyer, is obviously not its mere character as non-being, but the fact that it is not elected and willed by God the Creator, but rather rejected and excluded. It is that to which God said No when He said Yes to the creature. And that is chaos according to the biblical term and concept” (Church Dogmatics: The Doctrine of Creation, vol. III.3, trans, Bromiley, G. W. and Ehrlich, R. J. [Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1960], pp. 75–76)Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G., Pauline Churches and Diaspora Jews (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011), pp. 363–87Google Scholar
Garnsey, Peter, Ideas of Slavery from Aristotle to Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
O’Donovan, Oliver, The Desire of the Nations: Rediscovering the Roots of Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 184–86Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the College de France, 1981–82, trans. Burchill, Graham (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005), pp. 205–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Peter, Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth, the Fall of Rome, and the Making of Christianity in the West, 350–550 AD (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Marrow, Stanley, “κόσμος in John,” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 64 (2002): 90–102Google Scholar
Su, Celina, Streetwise for Book Smarts: Grassroots Organizing and Education Reform in the Bronx (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Wills, Jane, “Campaigning for Low Paid Workers: The East London Communities Organisation (TELCO) Living Wage Campaign,” in The Future of Worker Representation, eds. Healy, Geraldine, Heery, Edmund, Taylor, Phil, and Brown, William (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 264–82Google Scholar
Mews, Constant J. and Abraham, Ibrahim, “Usury and Just Compensation: Religious and Financial Ethics in Historical Perspective,” Journal of Business Ethics 72.1 (2007): 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith in Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence (London: Verso, 2004)Google Scholar
Allen, Danielle S., Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004), pp. 53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Gordon, “Democracy and the American Revolution,” in Democracy: The Unfinished Journey, 508 BC to AD 1993, ed. Dunn, John [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992], p. 103)Google Scholar
Alinsky, Saul, “The War on Poverty – Political Pornography,” The Journal of Social Issues 21.1 (1965): 41–47, p. 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyte, Harry and Fretz, Eric, “Civic Professionalism,” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 14.2 (2010): 67–90Google Scholar
Stigler, George J., “The Theory of Economic Regulation,” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2.1 (1971): 3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, Irving. Janis understood groupthink to occur when peer and time pressures lead to a deterioration of “mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment” (Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascoes [New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1972], p. 9)Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis F., Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996), p. 77Google Scholar
Eliasoph, Nina, Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven, “Power and Authority,” in A History of Sociological Analysis, eds. Bottomore, Tom and Nisbet, Robert (New York: Basic Books, 1978), pp. 633–76Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, “Using Power/Fighting Power: The Polity,” in Democracy and Difference, ed. Benhabib, Seyla (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 46–66Google Scholar
Follett, Mary Parker, Creative Experience (New York: Longman, Green & Co, 1930 [1924]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven, Power: A Radical View, 2nd ed. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishops, Catholic, Economic Justice for All: Pastoral Letter on Catholic Social Teaching and the U.S. Economy (Washington, DC: U.S. Catholic Conference, 1986)Google Scholar
Warren, Mark, “Deliberative Democracy and Authority,” American Political Science Review 90 (1996): 46–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R., Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke, Sovereignty: God, State, and Self (New York: Basic Books, 2008)Google Scholar
Weintraub, Jeff, “The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction,” in Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, eds. Weintraub, Jeff and Kumar, Krishan (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997), pp. 1–42Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian, The State of Democratic Theory (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003), pp. 51–55Google Scholar
Cruikshank, Barbara, The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999), pp. 23–24Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon, “What Revolutionary Action Means Today,” in Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community, ed. Mouffe, Chantal (London: Verso, 1992), p. 245Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold, Suspicion and Faith: The Religious Uses of Modern Atheism (New York: Fordham University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America, trans. Bevan, Gerald (London: Penguin, 2003), p. 612Google Scholar
Porter, Roy, English Society in the Eighteenth Century, 2nd ed. (London: Penguin, 2001), p. 145Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. observed, for Hobbes, the state of nature is: “A statement of the behaviour to which men as they now are, men who live in civilised societies and have the desires of civilised men, would be led if all law and contract enforcement (i.e. even the present imperfect enforcement) were removed. To get to the state of nature, Hobbes has set aside law, but not the socially acquired behaviour and desires of men” (The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962], p. 22)Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey, Civil Sphere (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 132–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, René, Violence and the Sacred, trans. Gregory, Patrick (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Ganz, Marshall, “Why David Sometimes Wins: Strategic Capacity in Social Movements,” in The Psychology of Leadership: New Perspectives and Research, eds. Messick, David M. and Kramer, Roderick M. (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005), pp. 209–38Google Scholar
Coles, Romand, “Of Tensions and Tricksters: Grassroots Democracy between Theory and Practice,” Perspectives on Politics 4.03 (2006): 547–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, Dennis’s description of a “‘pray-in” at the county courthouse in Milwaukee in Doing Justice: Congregations and Community Organizing [Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 2001], pp. 36–37)Google Scholar
Melucci, Alberto, Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter, Theories of Political Protest and Social Movements (London: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar
Juris, Jeffrey S.Performing Politics: Image, Embodiment, and Affective Solidarity during Anti-Corporate Globalization Protests,” Ethnography 9.1 (2008): 61–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile, Professional Ethics and Civic Morals (London: Routledge, 2001 [1957]), pp. 76–109Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul, Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994), pp. 35–43Google Scholar
O’Donovan, Oliver, Ways of Judgment (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005), p. 179Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio, The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2011), pp. 169–93Google Scholar
Glasman, Maurice, “Labour As a Radical Tradition,” in The Labour Tradition and the Politics of Paradox, eds. Glasman, Maurice, Rutherford, Jonathan, Stears, Marc, and White, Stuart (London: Soundings, 2011), pp. 14–34Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, ed. Beiner, Ronald (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), pp. 76–77Google Scholar
Jones, Gareth Stedman, socialism itself is better understood “as a self proclaimed, science-based post-Christian religion or as a novel cosmology to which diverse forms of politics were at different time attached” (“Religion and the Origins of Socialism,” in Religion and the Political Imagination, eds. Katznelson, Ira, Jones, Gareth, and Goode, Walter [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007], p. 187)Google Scholar
Graeber, David, The Democracy Project: A History, a Crisis, a Movement (New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2013)Google Scholar
de Lubac, Henri, The Un-Marxian Socialist: A Study of Proudhon, trans. Scantlebury, R. E. (London: Sheed and Ward, 1948)Google Scholar
Marshall, Peter, Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism (London: HarperCollins, 2008), p. 85Google Scholar
Kemmerer, Lisa, “Anarchy: Foundations in Faith,” in Contemporary Anarchist Studies, eds. Amster, Randall, DeLeon, Abraham, Fernandez, Luis, Nocella, Anthony J., and Shannon, Deric (London: Routledge, 2009), pp. 200–12Google Scholar
Shepard, Benjamin, Play, Creativity, and Social Movements (London: Routledge, 2011)Google Scholar
Bretherton, Luke, “Sharing Peace: Class, Hierarchy and Christian Social Order,” in The Blackwell Companion to Christian Ethics, eds. Hauerwas, Stanley and Wells, Sam, rev. ed. (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), pp. 329–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David, “Contested Cities: Social Process and Spatial Form,” in Transforming Cities: Contested Governance and New Spatial Divisions, eds. Jewson, Nick and MacGregor, Susanne (London: Routledge, 1997), p. 19Google Scholar
White, Richard defines the middle ground in the following terms: “The middle ground is the place in between: in between cultures, peoples, and in between empires and the nonstate world of villages. … On the middle ground diverse peoples adjust their differences through what amounts to a process of creative, and often expedient, misunderstandings. People try to persuade others who are different from themselves by appealing to what they perceive to be the values and practices of those others. They often misinterpret and distort both the values and the practices of those they deal with, but from these misunderstandings arise new meanings and through them new practices – the shared meanings and practices of the middle ground” (The Middle Ground: Indians, Empires and Republics in the Great Lakes Region, 1650–1815 [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991], p. xxvi)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somers, Margaret R., Genealogies of Citizenship: Markets, Statelessness, and the Right to Have Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 63–117Google Scholar
O’Conner, Alice, “Swimming Against the Tide: A Brief History of Federal Policy in Poor Communities,” in Urban Problems and Community Development, eds. Ferguson, Ronald and Dickins, William (Washington, DC: Brookings Institute, 1999), pp. 77–138Google Scholar
Rawls, John, “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” in The Law of Peoples. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), p. 141Google Scholar
Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), pp. 214–15
Connolly, William E., Pluralism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberger, Peter J., The Concept of Political Judgment (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), pp. 67–69Google Scholar
Beiner, Ronald, Political Judgement (London: Methuen, 1983), p. 141Google Scholar
Rawls, John is a contemporary exponent of such an approach. For Rawls, we cannot develop what he calls “nonideal theory” without first working out ideal theory (A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. [Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999], p. 8)Google Scholar
Machiavelli, , The Prince, trans. Constantine, Peter [New York: Modern Library, 2008], p. 116)Google Scholar
Detienne, Marcel and Vernant, Jean-Pierre, it entails a body of attitudes and behaviors that combines flair, wisdom, forethought, perspicuity, subtlety, resourcefulness, vigilance, opportunism, and experience acquired over years that enables one to navigate circumstances of conflict, change, and instability (Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society, trans. Lloyd, Janet [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991])Google Scholar
Scott, James C., Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998), pp. 309–41Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent, Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again, trans. Sampson, Steven (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), p. 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel, “Preface,” in Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Hurley, Robert, Seem, Mark, and Lane, Helen R. (New York: Penguin Books, 2007), pp. xiGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Paul notes: “The critique of ideological forms and discourses of power is too often divorced from any more positive conception of the role and task of political theory” – or, we might add, of politics itself (“Political Theory – The State of the Art,” Politics 26.1 [2006]: 47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritzer, George, The McDonaldization of Society (Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Bryman, Alan, Disneyization of Society (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004)Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “Social Action and Rationality,” in Jürgen Habermas on Society and Politics: A Reader, ed. Seidman, Steven (Boston: Beacon Press, 1989), p. 157Google Scholar
Ashley, Kathleen M., “The Guiler Beguiled: Christ and Satan as Theological Tricksters in Medieval Religious Literature,” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 24.2 (1982): 126–37Google Scholar
Wink, Walter, Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1992), pp. 175–93Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary, “Men at Work: Poesis, Politics and Labor in Aristotle and Some Aristotelians,” Analyse & Kritik 30 (2008): 17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Kelvin, Aristotelian Philosophy: Ethics and Politics from Aristotle to MacIntyre (Cambridge: Polity, 2007), pp. 176–79Google Scholar
MacIntyre, , “Three Perspectives on Marxism: 1953, 1968, 1995,” in MacIntyre, Alasdair, Selected Essays, vol. 2, Ethics and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. xxviCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueglin, Thomas O., Early Modern Concepts for a Late Modern World: Althusius on Community and Federalism (Waterloo, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1999), pp. 56–82Google Scholar
Alinsky, , “Is There Life after Birth?Anglican Theological Review 1 (1968), p. 59Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Exodus and Revolution [New York: Basic Books, 1985])Google Scholar
Knight, Kelvin and Blackledge, Paul, “Introduction: Towards a Virtuous Politics,” in Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism, eds. Knight, Kelvin and Blackledge, Paul (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2011), pp. 1–10Google Scholar
Weintraub, Jeff, “Democracy and the Market: A Marriage of Inconvenience,” in From Leninism to Freedom: The Challenges of Democratization, ed. Nugent, Margarat Latus (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992), pp. 47–66Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey, “On the Interpretation of The Civil Sphere: Understanding and Contention in Contemporary Social Science,” Sociological Quarterly 48 (2007): 641–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Marvin B., The Emergence of Civil Society in the Eighteenth Century (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert, The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph, anniversary ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
de Montesquieu, Charles, The Spirit of the Laws, trans. Cohler, Anne, Miller, Basia and Stone, Harold (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989 [1748]), p. 338Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N., The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Chiapello, Eve’s The New Spirit of Capitalism (London: Verso, 2007)Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg in his The Philosophy of Money (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978)Google Scholar
Olsen, Erik J. points to the importance of property rights and the ability to act independently in the market to the civic agency of impoverished Indian women. He notes: “Whether in land or its movable forms, property can provide resources – dominium in the neoclassical republican sense of the word – in support of personal and civic independence and therefore dignity as well. By supporting independence, property can also play a role in securing the terms of civic equality” (Civic Republicanism and the Properties of Democracy [Langham, MD: Lexington Books, 2006], p. 264)Google Scholar
Baucom, Ian, Specters of the Atlantic: Finance Capital, Slavery, and the Philosophy of History (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardt, Michael, “The Withering of Civil Society,” Social Text 45 (1995): 27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark, Democracy and Association (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), pp. 32–37Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L. and Arato, Andrew, Civil Society and Political Theory (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey, “Civil Sphere, State, and Citizenship: Replying to Turner and the Fear of Enclavement,” Citizenship Studies 12.2 (2008): 185–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, John Howard as a particular practice of the church in Body Politics: Five Practices of the Christian Community before the Watching World (Scottdale, AZ: Herald Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Buber, Martin, “To the Clarification of Pacifism,” in A Believing Humanism: My Testament, 1902–1965 (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1967), pp. 212Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie, “Between Decision and Deliberation: Political Paradox in Democratic Theory,” American Political Science Review 101.1 (2007): 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Bryan, “Civility, Civil Sphere and Citizenship: Solidarity versus the Enclave Society,” Citizenship Studies 12:2 (2008): 177–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy [Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998], p. 300)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political, trans. Schwab, George, expanded ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), p. 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Given’s Nazi sympathies, there is a hollow ring to this claim. In his later work Schmitt distinguishes between the “‘real enemy” and the “absolute enemy.” The latter is one who is declared to be totally criminal and inhuman, “to be a total non-value” (Theory of the Partisan: Intermediate Commentary on the Concept of the Political, trans. Ulman, G. L. [New York: Telos Press Publishing, 2007], p. 94)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, “State Ethics and the Pluralist State,” in Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, eds. Jacobson, Arthur J. and Schlink, Bernhard (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000), pp. 300–12Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of Political Symbol, trans. Schwab, George and Hilfstein, Erna (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1996), p. 73Google Scholar
Schmitt, himself seems to step back from this assertion in his later work, conceding that it is the “degree of intensity of an association and dissociation” that constitutes the basis of making the friend-enemy distinction rather than whether such an association constitutes a state or not (Political Theology II: The Myth of the Closure of Any Political Theology, trans. Hoelzl, Michael and Ward, Graham [Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008], p. 45)Google Scholar
Schmitt, himself notes that evolution of the economically based power of workers and capitalists into political power through their assuming political representation (Roman Catholicism and Political Form, trans. Ulman, G. L. [Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1996], p. 24)Google Scholar
Waterman, Anthony, Political Economy and Christian Theology since the Enlightenment: Essays in Intellectual History (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), p. 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal, “Religion, Liberal Democracy, and Citizenship,” in Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World, ed. de Vries, Hent and Sullivan, Lawrence (New York: Fordham University Press, 2006), p. 338Google Scholar
Mouffe, , The Return of the Political (London: Verso, 1993), p. 30Google Scholar
Bader, Veit, “Religious Diversity and Democratic Institutional Pluralism,” Political Theory 31.2 (2003): 265–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Religions and States: A New Typology and a Plea for Non-Constitutional Pluralism,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6.1 (2003): 55–91
Dryzek, John, “Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia,” Political Theory 33.2 (2005): 218–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey, “Oases in the Desert: Hannah Arendt on Democratic Politics,” The American Political Science Review 88.1 (1994): 156–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen and Derrida, Jacques, Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, ed. with commentary by Borradori, Giovanna (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), p. 113Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Rogues: Two Essays on Reason (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, “The Political Technology of Individuals,” in Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, eds. Martin, Luther, Gutman, Huck and Hutton, Patrick (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1988), pp. 145–62Google Scholar
Gillespie, Michael, Theological Origins of Modernity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst, The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957)Google Scholar
Gelasius I, “‘The Bond of Anathema,” in From Irenaeus to Grotius: A Sourcebook in Christian Political Thought, 100–1625, eds. O’Donovan, Oliver and O’Donovan, Joan Lockwood (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999), pp. 178–79Google Scholar
Milbank, John, “On Complex Space,” in The Word Made Strange: Theology, Language, Culture (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1997), pp. 268–92Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric, The Hebrew Republic: Jewish Sources and the Transformation of European Political Thought (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, Adrian, The Construction of Nationhood: Ethnicity, Religion and Nationalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Julian, “Sovereignty and the Mixed Constitution: Bodin and his Critics,” in The Cambridge History of Political Thought: 1450–1700, eds. Burns, J. H. and Goldie, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 298–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, Jean, On Sovereignty: Four Chapters from “The Six Books of the Commonwealth,” trans. Franklin, Julian (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), p. 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maritain, Jacques, “The Concept of Sovereignty,” The American Political Science Review 44.2 (1950): 343–57, p. 346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueglin, Thomas, Early Modern Concepts for a Late Modern World: Althusius on Community and Federalism (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 127Google Scholar
Manent, Pierre. An Intellectual History of Liberalism, trans. Balinski, Rebecca [Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994])Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques, The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 146Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick explains: “God willed ‘antecedently’ (or generally) that all men be saved, but after the Fall of Adam He willed ‘consequently’ (or particularly) that only some be saved” (The General Will before Rousseau: The Transformation of the Divine into the Civic [Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986], p. 6)Google Scholar
Brooke, Christopher, “Rousseau’s Political Philosophy: Stoic and Augustinian Origins,” in The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau, ed. Riley, Patrick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 94–123Google Scholar
Cullen, Bernard, Hegel’s Social and Political Thought (Dublin: Gill and MacMillan, 1979), p. 42Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary, “Sovereignty, War and the Corporation: Hegel on the Medieval Foundations of the Modern State,” The Journal of Politics 49.2 (1987): 500–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, , Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, trans. Knox, T. M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967), p. 177Google Scholar
Lakeland, Paul, The Politics of Salvation: The Hegelian Idea of the State (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1984), p. 53Google Scholar
Stein, P. G., “Roman Law,” in The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c. 350–c. 1450, ed. Burns, J. H. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 45Google Scholar
Lloyd, Howell, “Constitutionalism,” in The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 267–68Google Scholar
Tully, James, Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purdy, Jedediah, The Meaning of Property: Freedom, Community and the Legal Imagination [New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011], pp. 70–71Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio, Commonwealth (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Buber, Martin, Paths in Utopia (New York: Syracuse University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Hardt, and Negri, , Empire [Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press, 2000], p. 120)Google Scholar
Parekh, Bikhu, “Liberalism and Colonialism: A Critique of Locke and Mill,” in The Decolonization of Imagination: Culture, Knowledge and Power, eds. Pieterse, Jan Nederveen and Parekh, Bhikhu (London: Zed Books, 1995), pp. 81–98Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony, “Human Rights, Natural Rights, and Europe’s Imperial Legacy,” Political Theory 31.2 (2003): 171–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David, “John Locke, Carolina, and the ‘Two Treatises of Government,’Political Theory 32.5 (2004): 602–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneil, Barbara, John Locke and America: The Defense of English Colonialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, Robert, “Social Sovereignty,” Theory, Culture and Society 17.4 [2000]: 1–18, p. 6)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Philip, The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 4–6Google Scholar
von Gierke, Otto, Community in Historical Perspective, ed. Black, Antony, trans. Fischer, Mary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul Q., ed., The Pluralist Theory of the State: Selected Writings of G. D. H. Cole, J. N. Figgis, and H. J. Laski (London: Routledge, 1993)
Stears, Marc, “Guild Socialism,” in Modern Pluralism: Anglo-American Debates Since 1880, ed. Bevir, Mark (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 40–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Avigail, Reconstructing Political Pluralism (New York: SUNY Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Chaplin, Jonathan, Herman Dooyeweerd: Christian Philosopher of State and Civil Society (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Hittinger, Russell, “Social Pluralism and Subsidiarity in Catholic Doctrine,” Christianity and Civil Society: Catholic and Neo-Calvinist Perspectives, ed. Schindler, Jeanne Heffernan (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2008)Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z., “‘Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global,” Sydney Law Review 30 (2008): 375–411Google Scholar
Twinning, William, General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David criticizes Ostrom for being too localist in orientation, but this is not a necessary implication of her work (Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution [London: Verso, 2012], pp. 68–88)Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend, The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands, 2nd ed. (Berkley: University of California Press, 1975), pp. 1–2Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend, Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Thinking about Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice (London: Routledge, 2008)
Van Schendelen, M. P. C. M., “Consociational Democracy: The Views of Arend Lijphart and Collected Criticisms,” Political Science Reviewer 15 (1985): 143–83Google Scholar
McRae, Kenneth, “The Plural Society and the Western Political Tradition,” Canadian Journal of Political Science 12.4 (1979): 675–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Jürg, “Review: The Consociational Theory and Beyond,” Comparative Politics 13.3 (1981): 339–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter and Jacobson, Gary, “Arend Lijphard, A Profile,” PS: Political Science and Politics 28.4 (1995): 751–54Google Scholar
Grabill, Stephen, Rediscovering the Natural Law in Reformed Theological Ethics (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006), pp. 122–30Google Scholar
Held, David, Models of Democracy, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Polity, 2006)Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua and Rogers, Joel, Associations and Democracy [London: Verso, 1995]Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Clarendon, 1997)Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael, Democracy’s Discontent (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, Multiculturalism and the “Politics of Recognition”: An Essay, ed. Gutmann, Amy (Pinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992), pp. 25–73Google Scholar
The Ethics of Authenticity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992)
Honohan, Iseult, Civic Republicanism (London: Routledge, 2002), pp. 8–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Politics and Passion: Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Harris, Edward, “Did Solon Abolish Debt-Bondage?” in Democracy and the Rule of Law in Classical Athens: Essays on Law, Society and Politics, ed. Harris, Edward (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 249–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, , The Constitution of Athens, trans. Moore, J. M., in The Politics and The Constitution of Athens, ed. Everson, Stephen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), II.2–3, VI.1–4; pp. 211Google Scholar
Meikle, Scott, “Aristotle and the Political Economy of the Polis,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 99 (1979): 57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, Paul, Lending and Borrowing in Ancient Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 151–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, , The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Ross, David (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980), p. 84Google Scholar
Plato, , Laws, in The Dialogues of Plato, trans. Jowett, Benjamin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953), IV.705a, pp. 273–74Google Scholar
Cicero, , On Duties, eds. Griffin, M. T. and Atkins, E. M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 58Google Scholar
Aristotle, : “And the avarice of mankind is insatiable … men always want more and more without end; for it is of the nature of desire to be unlimited, and most men live only for the gratification of it” (The Politics, ed. Everson, Stephen [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996], p. 45Google Scholar
Hénaff, Marcel, The Price of Truth: Gift, Money, and Philosophy (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010), p. 90Google Scholar
Meikle, Scott, “Aristotle on Money,” Phronesis 39.1 (1994): 26–44, pp. 30–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Francis, Text, Church and World: Biblical Interpretation in Theological Perspective (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1994), pp. 68–70Google Scholar
Langholm, Odd points out, the question of what constitutes compulsion and the issue of whether a voluntary act was really done under duress is central to the definitions of and debate around usury (Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought: Antecedents of Choice and Power [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chirichigno, Gregory, Debt-Slavery in Israel and Ancient Near East (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Isaac, Slavery in the Ancient Near East: A Comparative Study of Slavery in Babylonia, Assyria, Syria and Palestine from the Middle of the Third Milennium to the End of the First Milennium (New York: Oxford University Press, 1949)Google Scholar
Yoder, John Howard, The Politics of Jesus, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1994), pp. 60–75Google Scholar
Eubank, Nathan, Wages of Cross-Bearing and the Debt of Sin: The Economy of Heaven in Matthew’s Gospel (Göttingen: De Gruyter, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Gary, Sin: A History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Mealand, David, Poverty and Expectation in the Gospels [London: SPCK, 1980], pp. 46–53)Google Scholar
Schenker, Adrian, “The Biblical Legislation on the Release of Slaves: The Road from Exodus to Leviticus,” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 78 (1998): 23–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstamm, Samuel, “neshek and ma/tarbît,” Journal of Biblical Literature 88:1 [1969]: 78–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, D. L., Tight Fists or Open Hands?: Wealth and Poverty in Old Testament Law [Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2009], p. 260)Google Scholar
Milgrom, Jacob, Leviticus 23–27 (New York: Doubleday, 2000), pp. 2209–10Google Scholar
von Rad, Gerhard notes, charging interest was common in the surrounding countries at the time (von Rad, Deuteronomy [London: SCM, 1966], p. 148)Google Scholar
Neusner, Jacob, “Aristotle’s and the Mishnah’s Economics: The Matter of Wealth and Usury,” Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period 21.1 [1990]: 41–59)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrera, Albino, God and the Evil of Scarcity: Moral Foundations of Economic Agency (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005), p. 54Google Scholar
Houston, Walter, “What’s Just about the Jubilee? Ideological and Ethical Reflections on Leviticus 25,” Studies in Christian Ethics 14:1 (2001): 34–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeber, David, Debt: The First 5,000 Years (New York: Melville House, 2011), pp. 271–82Google Scholar
Fadel, Mohammad, “Riba, Efficiency and Prudential Regulation: Preliminary Thoughts,” Wisconsin International Law Journal 25.4 (2008): 655–703Google Scholar
Novak, David, “Economics and Justice: A Jewish Example,” in Jewish Social Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 210
Elazar, Daniel, Covenant and Polity in Biblical Israel: Biblical Foundations and Jewish Expressions (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1995), pp. 86–91Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Political Writings, trans, Dyson, R. W. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 205–20Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 187–210Google Scholar
Maddox, Randy, “‘Visit the Poor’ John Wesley, the Poor, and the Sanctification of Believers,” in The Poor and the People Called Methodists, ed., Heitzenrater, Richard P. (Nashville, TN: Kingswood Books, 2002), pp. 59–81Google Scholar
Neufeld, Edward, “The Prohibitions against Loans at Interest in Ancient Hebrew Laws,” Hebrew Union College Annual 26 (1955): 355–412Google Scholar
Calvin, John, Commentarii in Libros Mosis necum in Librum Josue (Amsterdam, 1567)Google Scholar
Biéler, André, Calvin’s Economic and Social Thought, trans. Greig, James [Geneva: WCC Publications, 2005], p. 404)Google Scholar
Derrida, , Dissémination, trans. Johnson, Barbara [London: Athlone Press, 1981], p. 70)Google Scholar
von Hayek, Friedrich A., Law Legislation and Liberty, vol. 2, The Mirage of Social Justice [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978], pp. 107–08)Google Scholar
Robinson, Cedric, Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition (London: Zed Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Ashworth, John, “The Relationship between Capitalism and Humanitarianism,” The American Historical Review 92.4 (1987): 813–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, Robin, The American Crucible: Slavery, Emancipation and Human Rights (London: Verso, 2011), pp. 304–27Google Scholar
Rockman, Seth, “Slavery and Capitalism,” The Journal of the Civil War Era 2.1 (2012): 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Organization, ILO 2012 Global Estimate of Forced Labour Executive Summary (Geneva: International Labour Office, 2012)Google Scholar
Ingham, Geoffrey, “Class Inequality and the Social Production of Money,” in Renewing Class Analysis, eds. Crompton, Rosemary, Devine, Fiona, Savage, Mike and Scott, John [Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2000], p. 73)Google Scholar
Noonan, John T., The Scholastic Analysis of Usury (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957)Google Scholar
Wood, Diane, Medieval Economic Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp.159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Goff, Jacques, Your Money or Your Life: Economy and Religion in the Middle Ages, trans. Ranum, Patricia (New York: Zone Books, 1990)Google Scholar
O’Donovan, Joan Lockwood, “The Theological Economics of Medieval Usury,” Studies in Christian Ethics 14.1 (2001): 48–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, Christopher, He Became Poor: The Poverty of Christ and Aquinas’s Economic Teaching (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2009), pp. 70–83Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologiæ, 2a2æ. 63–79, vol. 38 Injustice, trans. Lefébure, Marcus [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006], 78.1; p. 235)Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, “Second Essay,” On the Genealogy of Morality and Other Writings, trans. Diethe, Carol (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 38–71Google Scholar
MacIntyre, , Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues [London: Duckworth, 1999], p. 127)Google Scholar
Zerbe, Gordon Mark, Citizenship: Paul on Peace and Politics [Winnipeg: Canadian Mennonite University Press, 2012], pp. 75–92)Google Scholar
Gregory, Eric, Politics and the Order of Love: Augustinian Ethic of Democratic Citizenship (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008)Google Scholar
von Heyking, John, “The Luminous Path of Friendship: Augustine’s Account of Friendship and Political Order,” Friendship and Politics: Essays in Political Thought, eds. von Heyking, John and Avramenko, Richard (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2008), pp. 115–38Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian, The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law, and Church Law, 1150–1625 (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 51–71
Ingham, Geoffrey, The Nature of Money (Cambridge: Polity, 2004), pp. 69–85Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, “Defence of Usury,” in Economic Writings, vol. 1, ed. Stark, Werner (London: Allen and Unwin, 1952), pp. 123–207Google Scholar
Barth, Karl, The Christian Life: Church Dogmatics IV.4 Lecture Fragments, trans, Bromiley, Geoffrey (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1981), p. 221Google Scholar
Hart, Keith, “Heads or Tails? Two Sides of the Coin,” Man 21.3 [1986]: 638–39)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, Land and Sea, trans. Draghici, Simona (Washington, DC: Plutarch Press, 1997), pp. 1–9Google Scholar
Lazzarato, Maurizio, The Making of Indebted Man: An Essay on the Neoliberal Condition, trans., Jordon, Joshua David [Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2011])Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut, Red Vienna: Experiment in Working Class Culture 1919–1934 [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991])Google Scholar
Chaloupek, Günther, “The Austrian Debate on Economic Calculation in a Socialist Economy,” History of Political Economy 22.4 (1990): 659–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavoie, Don, Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Hayek, ’s The Road to Serfdom (London: Routledge, 1944)Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich, Collectivist Economic Planning: Critical Studies on the Possibilities of Socialism (London: Routledge, 1935)Google Scholar
Polanyi, ’s key arguments appear in “Sozialistische Rechnungslegung,” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 49.2 (1922): 377–420Google Scholar
Die funktionelle Theorie der Gesellschaft und das Problem der sozialistischen Rechnungslegung,” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 52 (1924): 218–228
“Über die Freiheit,” and “Zur Socialisierungsfrage,” in Chronik der großen Transformation, vol. 3, eds. Cangiani, Michele, Polanyi-Levitt, Karl, and Thomasberger, Claus (Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag, 2005)Google Scholar
Shearmur, Jeremy, “Hayek’s Politics,” The Cambridge Companion to Hayek, ed. Feser, Edward (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 159Google Scholar
Albert, Michael, Parecon: Life After Capitalism (London: Verso, 2003)Google Scholar
Hahnel, Robin, Of the People, By the People: The Case for a Participatory Economy (Portland: Soapbox Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Silver, Beverly J., Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization Since 1870 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudeman, Stephen, “Necessity or Contingency: Mutuality and Market,” in Market and Society: The Great Transformation Today, eds. Hann, Chris and Hart, Keith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Mark, Randles, Sally, and Ramilogan, Ronnie, “Working with and beyond Polanyian Perspectives,” in Karl Polanyi: New Perspectives on the Place of the Economy in Society, eds. Harvey, Mark, Ramlogan, Ronnie, and Randles, Sally (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2007), pp. 3–7Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H., Citizenship and Social Class (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950)Google Scholar
Lacher, Hannes, “The Slight Transformation: Contesting the Legacy of Karl Polanyi,” in Reading Karl Polanyi for the Twenty-First Century: Market Economy as Political Project, eds. Buğra, Ayşe and Ağartan, Kaan (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), pp. 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, envisaged social insurance legislation as enshrining a principle of reciprocity (The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies [London: Routledge, 2001], pp. 86–87)Google Scholar
Mau, Steffan, “Welfare Regimes and the Norms of Social Exchange,” Current Sociology 52.1 (2004): 53–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caillé, Alan, The World of the Gift (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998), pp. 51–64Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael develops a constructive account of the relationship between gifts and redistribution and sees both as limiting the power of money. However, his primary concern is with developing an account of redistributive justice with the role of gifts dealt with only in passing (Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality [New York: Basic Books, 1983])Google Scholar
Bruni, Luigino and Zamagni, Stefano, Civil Economy: Efficiency, Equity, Public Happiness (Bern: Peter Lang, 2007), pp. 20–21Google Scholar
Bruni, Luigino develops a different taxonomy: Reciprocity, Altruism and the Civil Society: In Praise of Heterogeneity (London: Routledge, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbank, John, Being Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon (London: Routledge, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn, Economy of Grace (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Mathewes, Charles T., A Theology of Public Life [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Philippe, “The Critique of the Economic Point of View: Karl Polanyi and the Durkheimians,” in Market and Society: The Great Transformation Today, eds. Hann, Chris and Hart, Keith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 56–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Jonathan, “The Gift, the Indian Gift and the ‘Indian Gift,’” Man 21.3 (1986): 453–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deSilva, David, Honor, Patronage, Kinship and Purity: Unlocking New Testament Culture (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2000), pp. 106–48Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., Empire of Humanity: A History of Humanitarianism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Rist, Gilbert, The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith (London: Zed Books, 2002)Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, “Ethical and Theological Considerations on the Golden Rule,” in Figuring the Sacred: Religion, Narrative, and Imagination, ed. Wallace, Mark I., trans. Pellauer, David (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1995), pp. 293–302Google Scholar
The Golden Rule: Exegetical and Theological Perplexities,” New Testament Studies 36.3 (1990): 392–97
Kirk, Alan, “‘Love Your Enemies,’ the Golden Rule, and Ancient Reciprocity [Luke 6:27–35],” Journal of Biblical Literature 122.4 (2003): 667–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donovan, Oliver, The Problem of Self-Love in St. Augustine (London: Yale University Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Liebersohn, Harry, The Return of the Gift: European History of a Global Idea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Gregor, Mary, 2nd ed. [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012])Google Scholar
Dixon, Thomas, “The Invention of Altruism: Auguste Comte’s Positive Polity and Respectable Unbelief in Victorian Britain,” in Science and Beliefs: From Natural Philosophy to Natural Science, 1700–1900, eds. Knight, David M. and Eddy, Matthew D. (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2005), pp. 195–211Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan, Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850–1930 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991), pp. 60–90Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon, Tocqueville between Two Worlds: The Making of a Political and Theoretical Life, new ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003), p. 422Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. M., The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1970)Google Scholar
Rawls, John, “Justice as Reciprocity,” in Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 190–224Google Scholar
Reinders, Hans S., Receiving the Gift of Friendship: Profound Disability, Theological Anthropology, and Ethics (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008), pp. 312–78Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, The Just, trans. Pellauer, David (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), pp. 36–57Google Scholar
Brooks, Thom, “Reciprocity as Mutual Recognition,” The Good Society 21.1 (2012): 21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Politics of Friendship, trans. Collins, George (London: Verso, 1997), pp. 93–99Google Scholar
Caputo, John, “Who is Derrida’s Zarathustra? Of Fraternity, Friendship, and a Democracy to Come,” Research in Phenomenology 29 (1999): 184–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques and Roudinesco, Elisabeth, For What Tomorrow …: A Dialogue, trans. Fort, Jeff [Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004], p. 59)Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, “The Villanova Roundtable: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida,” in Deconstruction in a Nutshell, ed. Caputo, John D. (New York: Fordham University Press, 1997), p. 18Google Scholar
Hart, Keith, The Memory Bank: Money in an Unequal World (London: Profile Books, 1999)Google Scholar
Buchan, James, Frozen Desire: An Inquiry into the Meaning of Money (London: Picador, 1997), p. 108Google Scholar
Maurer, Bill, “The Anthropology of Money,” Annual Review of Anthropology 35 (2006): 15–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc, The Truth of Democracy, trans. Brault, Pascale-Anne and Naas, Michael (New York: Fordham University Press, 2010), pp. 19–25Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon, “Agitated Times,” Parallax 11.4 (2005): 2–11, p. 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feit, Mario, “Wolin, Time, and the Democratic Temperament,” Theory & Event 15.4 (2012)Google Scholar
Agamben, notes: “Every conception of history is invariably accompanied by a certain experience of time which is implicit in it, conditions it, and thereby has to be elucidated. Similarly, every culture is first and foremost a particular experience of time, and no new culture is possible without an alteration in this experience. The original task of a genuine revolution, therefore, is never merely to ‘change the world’, but also – and above all – to ‘change time’” (“Time and History: Critique of the Instant and the Continuum,” in Infancy and History: On the Destruction of Experience, trans. Heron, Liz [London: Verso, 1993], p. 91)Google Scholar
Lear, Jonathan’s Kierkegaardian conception of irony (The Case for Irony [Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, William James, “Economies of Time: On the Idea of Time in Marx’s Political Economy,” Political Theory 19.1 (1991): 7–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–1978, trans. Burchell, Graham (New York: Picador, 2007)Google Scholar
Estlund, Cynthia, Working Together: How Workplace Bonds Strengthen a Diverse Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. I, trans. Fowkes, Ben (London: Penguin Books, 1990)Google Scholar
Davis, Rowenna, Tangled Up in Blue: Blue Labour and the Struggle for Labour’s Soul (London: Ruskin Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar
Sanders, Heywood, “Communities Organized for Public Service and Neighborhood Revitalization in San Antonio,” in Public Policy and Community: Activism and Governance in Texas, ed. Wilson, Robert (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1997), pp. 36–68Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc, “Ethnografeast: A Progress Report on the Practice and Promise of Ethnography,” Ethnography 4.1 [2003]: 5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stringer, Ernest T., Action Research, 2nd ed. [London: Sage Publications, 1999], p. 10)Google Scholar
Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. and Davis, J. criticize the tendency, even in qualitative research, to treat relationships as a tool or strategy for gaining access to data, rather than as a means through which to establish a real relationship. They argue that “relationships that are complex, fluid, symmetric, and reciprocal – that are shaped by both researchers and actors – reflect a more responsible ethical stance and are likely to yield deeper data and better social science.” They go on to emphasize the continual creation and renegotiation of the trust, intimacy, and reciprocity involved in building real research relationships (The Art and Science of Portraiture [San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997], pp. 137–38)Google Scholar
Redman, Eric’s The Dance of Legislation (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1973)Google Scholar
Winch, Christopher, “Georg Kerschensteiner – Founding the Dual System in Germany,” Oxford Review of Education 32.3 (2006): 381–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Linda and Winch, Christopher, “Apprenticeship and Applied Theoretical Knowledge,” Educational Philosophy and Theory 36.5 (2004): 509–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles, Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of Interview in Social Science Research (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Timothy, “Fieldwork and the Perception of Everyday Life,” Man 29.2 (1994): 433–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauerwas, Stanley, “The Politics of Church: How We Lay Bricks and Make Disciples,” in After Christendom? How the Church is to Behave if Freedom, Justice and a Christian Nation are Bad Ideas (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1991)Google Scholar
“Carving Stone or Learning to Speak Christian,” in The State of the University: Academic Knowledges and the Knowledge of God (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2007)
Bellah, Robert, “Social Science as Practical Reason,” in Ethics, Social Sciences, and Policy Analysis, eds. Callahan, Daniel and Jennings, Bruce [New York: Plenum Press, 1983], pp. 37–64)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, David, in his parallel account of what he calls the “normative case study” gives a long array of other such examples (“The Normative Case Study,” American Journal of Sociology 111.6 [2006]: 1631–76)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, Michael, Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Burawoy, et al., Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imaginations in a Postmodern World [Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000], xiv)Google Scholar
Bretherton, Luke, “Coming to Judgment: Methodological Reflections on the Relationship between Ecclesiology, Ethnography and Political Theory,” Modern Theology 28.2 (2012): 167–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, Michael, “The Extended Case Method,” Sociological Theory 16:1 (1998): 4–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, Michael, “Revisits: An Outline of a Theory of Reflexive Ethnography,” American Sociological Review 68 (2003): 645–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Notes
  • Luke Bretherton, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Resurrecting Democracy
  • Online publication: 18 December 2014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Notes
  • Luke Bretherton, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Resurrecting Democracy
  • Online publication: 18 December 2014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Notes
  • Luke Bretherton, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Resurrecting Democracy
  • Online publication: 18 December 2014
Available formats
×