Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Restructuring Territoriality
- I THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS
- II THE TRANSFORMATION OF GOVERNANCE
- 4 Sovereignty and Territoriality in the European Union: Transforming the UK Institutional Order
- 5 Social Citizenship in the European Union: Toward a Spatial Reconfiguration?
- 6 Islands of Transnational Governance
- 7 Regional Integration and Left Parties in Europe and North America
- III EUROPE–U.S. COMPARISONS
- VI CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- Reference List
- Index
4 - Sovereignty and Territoriality in the European Union: Transforming the UK Institutional Order
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Restructuring Territoriality
- I THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS
- II THE TRANSFORMATION OF GOVERNANCE
- 4 Sovereignty and Territoriality in the European Union: Transforming the UK Institutional Order
- 5 Social Citizenship in the European Union: Toward a Spatial Reconfiguration?
- 6 Islands of Transnational Governance
- 7 Regional Integration and Left Parties in Europe and North America
- III EUROPE–U.S. COMPARISONS
- VI CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
- Reference List
- Index
Summary
The thematic core of this book involves changes in the territorial basis of politics resulting from broader social, political, and economic changes in the domestic and global political economies. We focus in particular on changes in the territorial organization of authority in the modern state. One of the documents we read at the beginning of this project was titled “Beyond Center and Periphery or the Unbundling of Territoriality” (Ansell and DiPalma 1998). In an effort to galvanize our energies into a collective project, this paper enjoined us to examine ways in which contemporary territorial structures of authority could be “unbundled” or “unpacked” so as better to understand changing configurations of power and authority in the modern state.
In part, this guidance was motivated by an emerging literature on the “new medievalism” (Anderson 1996) as well as by persistent critiques that contemporary research in comparative and international politics was state-centric and caught in a “territorial trap” (Agnew 1994). Just as the transition to the Westphalian order involved a consolidation of rule and territory, so the neomedieval turn implies a loosening of the ties among authority, sovereignty, and territory.
The medieval model of rule was marked by three integrated properties of governance. Governance was parcellized and personalized in use and function and aspatial in its underlying conception and physical organization. Parcellization implies no overarching system of rule for all subject matters. Separate authorities existed within the same physical space, without clearly demarcated jurisdictions.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Restructuring TerritorialityEurope and the United States Compared, pp. 67 - 89Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
- 1
- Cited by