Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on Contributors
- List of Tables and Figures
- Introduction States, Consumption and Managing Religions
- Part I From Deprivitization to Securitization
- Part II From Pietism to Consumerism
- Chapter 8 Chinese Religion, Market Society and the State
- Chapter 9 Hindu Normalization, Nationalism and Consumer Mobilization
- Chapter 10 Clash of Secularity and Religiosity: The Staging of Secularism and Islam through the Icons of Atatürk and the Veil in Turkey
- Chapter 11 Gramsci, Jediism, the Standardization of Popular Religion and the State
- Part III Concluding Comments
Chapter 10 - Clash of Secularity and Religiosity: The Staging of Secularism and Islam through the Icons of Atatürk and the Veil in Turkey
from Part II - From Pietism to Consumerism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on Contributors
- List of Tables and Figures
- Introduction States, Consumption and Managing Religions
- Part I From Deprivitization to Securitization
- Part II From Pietism to Consumerism
- Chapter 8 Chinese Religion, Market Society and the State
- Chapter 9 Hindu Normalization, Nationalism and Consumer Mobilization
- Chapter 10 Clash of Secularity and Religiosity: The Staging of Secularism and Islam through the Icons of Atatürk and the Veil in Turkey
- Chapter 11 Gramsci, Jediism, the Standardization of Popular Religion and the State
- Part III Concluding Comments
Summary
1920s Republic
When the military interrupted parliamentary democratic politics in Turkey in 1980, the Turkish population did not know or predict that this was indeed the harbinger of far-reaching transformation in the position Islam has been used to occupying in the social and public life of Turkey. José Casanova's (1994) thesis about the significant “deprivatization” of religion applies well to the noteworthy presence that Islamic religiosity has achieved in Turkey's social, cultural, political and economic life in the last two decades or so. The term “deprivatization” signifies the emergence of new historical developments that entail the reversal of a certain secular trend, involving the entrance of religion into the public sphere and the arena of political contestation. Religion is called upon not simply to defend the territory that has been allocated to it,
but also to participate in the very struggles to define and set the modern boundaries between the private and public spheres, between system and life-world, between legality and morality, between individual and society, between family, civil society and state, between nations, states, civilizations and the world system.
(Casanova, 1994: 6)Following Casanova's thinking, it is possible to talk about a process of “deprivatization” of Islam in Turkey since the 1980s. Since then, not only has Turkey's political life become fairly volatile and unpredictable, but the social and cultural life has been characterized by the confrontation or clash of secular and Islamic ways of living, styles of dressing and manners, targeting the constitution of bodies and subjectivities.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Religion and the StateA Comparative Sociology, pp. 225 - 244Publisher: Anthem PressPrint publication year: 2011
- 4
- Cited by