Book contents
- Rebuilding Asia Following Natural Disasters
- Rebuilding Asia Following Natural Disasters
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Cycles of Destruction and Reconstruction
- 2 The Challenges of Disaster Risk Reduction in Rapidly Expanding Urban Environments
- 3 Continuity, Adaptation, and Change Following the 1993 Earthquake in Marathwada, India
- 4 Reflections on the Hanshin Earthquake of 1995 and the Reconstruction of Kobe, Japan
- 5 Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction Lessons from the 1999 Marmara Earthquake, Turkey
- 6 Positioning Stakeholders within Owner-Driven Post-Disaster Reconstruction Approaches
- 7 Blueprints for Change in Post-Tsunami Aceh, Indonesia
- 8 The Reconfiguration of Political, Economic and Cultural Landscapes in Post-Tsunami Thailand
- 9 The Right to Adequate Housing in Post-Disaster Situations
- 10 Beyond the 2006 Yogyakarta Earthquake
- 11 Decentralizing a “Top–Down” Post-Disaster Reconstruction
- 12 Humanitarian Assistance Following the 2011 Floods in Thailand and Cambodia
- 13 The Insurance Industry and Integrated Project Management Frameworks in Post-Disaster Reconstruction
- 14 Devastating Consequences, Flawed Responses
- 15 Post-Disaster Reconstruction in Asia
- Index
- References
5 - Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction Lessons from the 1999 Marmara Earthquake, Turkey
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2016
Book contents
- Rebuilding Asia Following Natural Disasters
- Rebuilding Asia Following Natural Disasters
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Cycles of Destruction and Reconstruction
- 2 The Challenges of Disaster Risk Reduction in Rapidly Expanding Urban Environments
- 3 Continuity, Adaptation, and Change Following the 1993 Earthquake in Marathwada, India
- 4 Reflections on the Hanshin Earthquake of 1995 and the Reconstruction of Kobe, Japan
- 5 Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction Lessons from the 1999 Marmara Earthquake, Turkey
- 6 Positioning Stakeholders within Owner-Driven Post-Disaster Reconstruction Approaches
- 7 Blueprints for Change in Post-Tsunami Aceh, Indonesia
- 8 The Reconfiguration of Political, Economic and Cultural Landscapes in Post-Tsunami Thailand
- 9 The Right to Adequate Housing in Post-Disaster Situations
- 10 Beyond the 2006 Yogyakarta Earthquake
- 11 Decentralizing a “Top–Down” Post-Disaster Reconstruction
- 12 Humanitarian Assistance Following the 2011 Floods in Thailand and Cambodia
- 13 The Insurance Industry and Integrated Project Management Frameworks in Post-Disaster Reconstruction
- 14 Devastating Consequences, Flawed Responses
- 15 Post-Disaster Reconstruction in Asia
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rebuilding Asia Following Natural DisastersApproaches to Reconstruction in the Asia-Pacific Region, pp. 141 - 159Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Aysan, Y., & Oliver, P. (1987). Housing and Culture after Earthquakes. Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic.Google Scholar
Barakat, S. (2003). Housing Reconstruction After Conflict and Disaster (Paper No. 43). London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Berke, P.R., Kartez, J., & Wenger, D. (1993). Recovery after disaster: achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters. 17 (2). pp. 93–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boano, C. (2009). Housing anxiety and multiple geographies in post-tsunami Sri Lanka. Disasters. 33 (4). pp. 762–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bozkurt, G. (2001). Deprem sonrası planlama deneyimi [Post-earthquake planning experiment]. Planlama [Planning]. 3. pp. 50–53.Google Scholar
Comerio, M.C. (1998). Disaster Hits Home: New Policy for Urban Housing Recovery. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, C.H., Johnson, C., Lizarraldea, G., Dikmen, N., & Sliwinski, A. (2007). Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat International. 31 (1). pp. 100–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, I. (1982). Shelter after Disaster: Guidelines for Assistance. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Dudley, E. (1992). Disaster aid: equity first. In Aysan, Y. & Davis, I. (eds.), Disasters and the Small Dwelling. London: James and James Science. pp. 146–161.Google Scholar
EM-DAT (2013). The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database (Université Catholique de Louvain – Brussels – Belgium). www.em-dat.netGoogle Scholar
Fallahi, A. (2007). Lessons learned from the housing reconstruction following the Bam earthquake in Iran. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 22 (1). pp. 26–35.Google Scholar
Freeman, P.K. (2004). Allocation of post-disaster reconstruction financing to housing. Building Research and Information. 32 (5). pp. 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapati, N.E. (2008). Disaster management structure in Turkey: away from a reactive and paternalistic approach? In Pinkowski, J. (ed.), Disaster Management Handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 281–320.Google Scholar
Ganapati, N.E. (2009). Rising from the rubble: emergence of place-based social capital in Gölcük, Turkey. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters. 27 (2). pp. 127–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapati, N.E. (2013). Measuring the processes and outcomes of post-disaster housing recovery: Lessons from Gölcük, Turkey. Natural Hazards. 65 (3). pp. 1783–1799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapati, N.E. (2014). Linking development to disasters in Turkey: moving forward after the Marmara earthquake. In Kapucu, N. & Liou, T. (eds.), Disasters and Development. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapati, N.E., & Ganapati, S. (2009). Enabling participatory planning in post-disaster contexts: a case study of World Bank’s housing reconstruction in Turkey. Journal of the American Planning Association. 75 (1). pp. 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapati, N.E., & Mukherji, A. (2014). Out of sync: World Bank funding for housing recovery, post-disaster planning and participation. Natural Hazards Review. 15 (1). pp. 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gölcük District Office (2000). Deprem Durum Raporu [State of the Earthquake Report]. Gölcük: Gölcük District Office.Google Scholar
Green, T.F., & Olshansky, R.B. (2012). Rebuilding housing in New Orleans: the road home program after the Hurricane Katrina disaster. Housing Policy Debate. 22 (1). pp. 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunewald, F., De Geoffroy, V., & Lister, S. (2000). NGO responses to Hurricane Mitch: Evaluations for accountability and learning. www.odihpn.org/download/networkpaper034pdf (accessed 10 June 2015).Google Scholar
Gulkan, P. (2005). An analysis of risk mitigation considerations in regional reconstruction in Turkey: the missing link. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 10. pp. 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, J.E., Kates, R.W., & Bowden, M.J. (eds.) (1977). Reconstruction Following Disaster. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Zhou, L., & Wei, K. (2011). 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake recovery government policies and non-governmental organizations’ participation. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development. 21 (2). pp. 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2004). Country Strategy Paper for Natural Disasters in Turkey. Ankara: JICA.Google Scholar
Kamel, N. (2012) Social marginalisation, federal assistance and repopulation patterns in the New Orleans metropolitan area following Hurricane Katrina. Urban Studies. 49 (14). pp. 3211–3231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamel, N., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2004). Residential assistance and recovery following the Northridge earthquake. Urban Studies. 41 (3). pp. 533–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K., & Olshansky, R.B. (2015). The Theory and Practice of Building Back Better. Journal of the American Planning Association. 80 (4). pp. 289–292, DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2014.988597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherji, A. (2010) Post-earthquake housing recovery in Bachhau, India: the homeowner, the renter, and the squatter. Earthquake Spectra. 26 (4). pp. 1085–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver-Smith, A. (1986). The Martyred City: Death and Rebirth in the Andes. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Peacock, W.G., Morrow, B.H., & Gladwin, H. (eds.) (1997). Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender and the Sociology of Disasters. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prime Minister’s Office-Crisis Management Center [PMO-CMC] [T.C. Basbakanlik Kriz Yonetim Merkezi] (2000). Depremler 1999. Ankara: PMO-CMC.Google Scholar
Quarantelli, E. (1982). Sheltering and Housing after Major Community Disasters: Case Studies and General Observations. Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Rubin, C.B., Saperstein, M., & Barbee, D. (1985). Community Recovery from a Major a Natural Disaster. Boulder: University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Ruwanpura, K.N. (2009). Putting houses in place: rebuilding communities in post-tsunami Sri Lanka. Disasters 33 (3). p. 436–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, G., & Wenger, D. (2007). Sustainable disaster recovery: operationalizing an existing agenda. In Rodriguez, H., Quarantelli, E.L. & Dynes, R.R. (eds.), Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer. pp. 234–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snarr, D.N., & Brown, L. (1982). Attrition and housing improvements: a study of post-disaster housing after three years. Disasters 6 (2). pp. 125–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
State Institute of Statistics (2002). 2000 Census of Population: Social and Economic Characteristics of Population-Kocaeli. Ankara: State Institute of Statistics.Google Scholar
Steinberg, F. (2007). Housing reconstruction and rehabilitation in Aceh and Nias, Indonesia – rebuilding lives. Habitat International. 31. pp. 150–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tas, N., Cosgun, N., & Tas, M. (2007). A qualitative evaluation of the after earthquake permanent housings in Turkey in terms of user satisfaction – Kocaeli, Gundogdu permanent housing model. Building and Environment. 42 (9). pp. 3418–3431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tas, N., Tas, M., & Cosgun, N. (2011). Permanent housing production process after 17 August 1999 Marmara earthquake in Turkey. International Journal of Strategic Property Management. 15 (3). pp. 312–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatlidede, D., & Torunbalci, N. (2008). Evaluation of the design, planning, construction phases, and structural content of permanent residential dwellings built after the 1999 Eastern Marmara earthquakes in Turkey. Journal of Architectural Engineering. 14 (4). pp. 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, K.J., Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (2001). Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Washington: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
Union Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects (UCTEA) (2000). Dogu Marmara Depremleri ve Türkiye Gerçekleri [East Marmara earthquakes and the realities of Turkey]. Ankara: UCTEA.Google Scholar
Uyar, N. (2001). 17 Agustos’un Ikinci Yilinda Kentler ve Planlama. Planlama [Planning]. 3. pp. 65–69.Google Scholar
Van Zandt, S., Peacock, W.G., Henry, D.W., Grover, H., Highfield, W.E., & Brody, S.D. (2012). Mapping social vulnerability to enhance housing and neighborhood resilience. Housing Policy Debate. 22 (1). pp. 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington Post (1999). Hunt for quake survivors winds down. 24 August. www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/daily/aug99/turkey24.htm (accessed 10 June 2015).Google Scholar
World Bank (2005a). Guidance Note for Project Management: Strengthening Institutional Capacity during Project Implementation. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2005b). Project Performance Assessment Report – Turkey (Erzincan Earthquake Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Project, Turkey Emergency Flood and Earthquake Recovery Project, Emergency Earthquake Recovery Project). Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2007). Implementation Completion And Results Report (IBRD-45170) On A Loan In The Amount Of US$294.4 Million To The Republic Of Turkey For Marmara Earthquake Emergency Reconstruction Project (Rep. No. ICR0000131). Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank Independent Evaluation Group (WB-IEG) (2006). Hazards of Nature, Risks to Development: An IEG Evaluation of the World Bank Assistance for Natural Disasters. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Xiao, Y. (2011). Local economic impacts of natural disasters. Journal of Regional Science. 51 (4). pp. 804–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Y., & Van Zandt, S. (2012). Building community resiliency: spatial links between household and business post-disaster return. Urban Studies. 49 (11). pp. 2523–2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Y., Wan, J., & Hewings, G.J.D. (2013). Flooding and the midwest economy: assessing the midwest floods of 1993 and 2008. GeoJournal. 78 (2). pp. 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yerelnet (2007). Imar Kanunu No. 3194 [Urban development law No. 3194]. www.yerelnet.org.tr/mevzuatGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Peacock, W.G. (2010). Planning for housing recovery? Journal of the American Planning Association. 76 (1). pp. 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar