3 - F.T. Prince: Truth in Style
from Part One - Styling Prince
Summary
I
From its lightly revised reappearance in Doors of Stone: Poems 1938–1962 (1963), F.T. P rince's ‘An Epistle to a Patron’ has led off his collected editions, staging their relations with readers by casting them as rulers of city states—states imagined, after Jacob Burckhardt, as works of art. On its first appearance in book form in Poems (1938), it did not command so prominent a position, thus appearing to individuate his style, being the seventeenth of 21 poems:
My lord, hearing lately of your opulence in promises and your house
Busy with parasites, of your hands full of favours, your statutes
Admirable as music and no fear of your arms not prospering, I have
Considered how to serve you and breed from my talents
Those few secrets which I shall make plain
To your intelligent glory
Both Donald Davie and Geoffrey Hill praise ‘An Epistle to a Patron’. Davie cites the poem's first 21 lines by ‘that most unjustly neglected contemporary F.T. P rince’ and then breaks into its flow with the following observations:
And so this splendid poem goes on. There is no reason why it should ever stop, for it is plain that under the guise of architect speaking to patron the poet is speaking to his reader, and speaking about his poem even as he writes it. For the building is ‘like an argument’, and the chambers in it ‘not less suitably shadowed than the heart’. The poem does not even explore the relationship, actual or ideal, of poet and reader; the poem is the poem's subject—that is all. And this of course is significant. For if the structures of expression are more interesting to the reader than the structures of experience behind them, the only way to induce the right sort of attention in the reader is to have nothing behind them at all, that is to have poems that are meaningless. The only alternative is to have poems that talk about themselves, as Prince's does.
Prince didn't agree that there was ‘no reason why it should ever stop’. There was ‘Every reason’, he told Anthony Rudolf: ‘it has a beginning, middle and end’. Davie's argumentative praise, his placing the poem in a Symbolist tradition to save it, through self-absorption, from the threat of meaninglessness, has, before it concludes, taken back much of what it had given.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reading F. T. Prince , pp. 51 - 74Publisher: Liverpool University PressPrint publication year: 2017