Book contents
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide
- Quality Management in Intensive Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Quality management of patient care
- Section 2 Quality management of the ICU
- 12 Tools to improve patient safety and adverse events
- 13 Clinical data management
- 14 Electronic ICU management systems
- 15 ICU staff
- 16 Severity scoring, improved care?
- 17 Implementation of evidence-based practice
- 18 Addressing barriers for change in clinical practice
- 19 Teambuilding
- 20 Conflict management in the intensive care unit
- 21 From polio to hospital-wide care
- 22 Patient and family satisfaction
- 23 Follow-up after intensive care
- 24 In situsmall-scale simulation
- Section 3 Quality management on the national (and international) level
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
23 - Follow-up after intensive care
from Section 2 - Quality management of the ICU
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2016
Book contents
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide
- Quality Management in Intensive Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Quality management of patient care
- Section 2 Quality management of the ICU
- 12 Tools to improve patient safety and adverse events
- 13 Clinical data management
- 14 Electronic ICU management systems
- 15 ICU staff
- 16 Severity scoring, improved care?
- 17 Implementation of evidence-based practice
- 18 Addressing barriers for change in clinical practice
- 19 Teambuilding
- 20 Conflict management in the intensive care unit
- 21 From polio to hospital-wide care
- 22 Patient and family satisfaction
- 23 Follow-up after intensive care
- 24 In situsmall-scale simulation
- Section 3 Quality management on the national (and international) level
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide, pp. 180 - 186Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Nouwen, MJ, Klijn, FA, van den Broek, BT, Slooter, AJ. Emotional consequences of intensive care unit delirium and delusional memories after intensive care unit admission: a systematic review. J Crit Care. 2012; 27(2): 199–211.Google Scholar
Ridley, S. Non-mortality outcome measures. In Outcomes in Critical Care. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2002, 120–138.Google Scholar
van den Boogaard, M, Schoonhoven, L, Evers, AW, van der Hoeven, JG, van Achterberg, T, Pickkers, P. Delirium in critically ill patients: impact on long-term health-related quality of life and cognitive functioning. Crit Care Med. 2012; 40(1): 112–118.Google Scholar
Wade, DM, Howell, DC, Weinman, JA, et al. Investigating risk factors for psychological morbidity three months after intensive care: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2012; 16(5): R192.Google Scholar
Dowdy, DW, Bienvenu, OJ, Dinglas, VD, et al. Are intensive care factors associated with depressive symptoms 6 months after acute lung injury? Crit Care Med. 2009; 37(5): 1702–1707.Google Scholar
Herridge, MS, Tansey, CM, Matte, A, et al. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. NEJM. 2011; 364(14): 1293–1304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulvik, A, Kvåle, R, Wentzel-larsen, T, Flaatten, H. Sexual function in ICU survivors more than 3 years after major trauma. Intensive Care Med. 2008; 34: 447–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkius, J, Engerstrom, L, Orwelius, L, et al. A prospective longitudinal multicentre study of health related quality of life in ICU survivors with COPD. Crit Care. 2013; 17(5): R211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowling, A. Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales. third edition. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Angus, DC, Carlet, J. Surviving intensive care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29(3): 368–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niskanen, M, Kari, A, Halonen, P. Five-year survival after intensive care: comparison of 12,180 patients with the general population. Finnish ICU patients. Crit Care Med. 1996; 24: 1962–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990; 16: 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, J, Snow, K, Kosinski, M, Gandek, B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide Boston, MA: The Health Institute, 1993.Google Scholar
Wehler, M, Geise, A, Hadzionerovic, D, et al. Health-related quality of life of patients with multiple organ dysfunction: individual changes and comparison with normative population. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31(4): 1094–1101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scales, DC, Tansey, CM, Matte, A, Herridge, MS. Difference in reported pre-morbid health-related quality of life between ARDS survivors and their substitute decision makers. Intensive Care Med. 2006; 32(11): 1826–1831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granja, C, Amaro, A, Dias, C, Costa-Pereira, A. Outcome of ICU survivors: a comprehensive review. The role of patient-reported outcome studies. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012; 56(9): 1092–1103.Google Scholar
Orwelius, L, Nordlund, A, Nordlund, P, et al. Pre-existing disease: the most important factor for health related quality of life long-term after critical illness: a prospective, longitudinal, multicentre trial. Crit Care. 2010; 14: R67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orwelius, L, Willebrand, M, Gerdin, B, Ekselius, L, Fredrikson, M, Sjoberg, F. Long term health-related quality of life after burns is strongly dependent on pre-existing disease and psychosocial issues and less due to the burn itself. Burns. 2013; 39(2): 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar