Bibliography

Joseph Jupille

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511510205.009

Arp, Henning A. 1992. The European Parliament in European Community Environmental Policy. EUI Working Paper No. EPU 92/13. Fiesola, Italy: European University Institute

Aspinwall, Mark, and Schneider, Gerald. 2000. Same Menu, Separate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn in Political Science and the Study of European Integration. European Journal of Political Research 38:1–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Bach, Stanley, and Steven S. Smith. 1988. Managing Uncertainty in the House of Representatives: Adaptation and Innovation in Special Rules. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution

Ballman, Alexander, Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 2002. Delegation, Comitology, and the Separation of Powers in the European Union. International Organziation 56, 3 (Summer):551–574CrossRef Google Scholar

Barents, René. 1988. Hormones and the Growth of Community Agricultural Law: Some Reflections on the Hormones Judgment (Case 68/86). Legal Issues of European Integration 1:1–15Google Scholar

Barents, René. 1989. Community Agricultural Law and the Court's Case Law in 1986–1988. Common Market Law Review 26, 3 (Autumn):391–421Google Scholar

Barents, René. 1993. The Internal Market Unlimited: Some Observations on the Legal Basis of Community Legislation. Common Market Law Review 30, 1 (February):85–109Google Scholar

Barents, René. 1994. The Agricultural Law of the EC: An Inquiry into the Administrative Law of the European Community in the Field of Agriculture. Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers

Barnard, Catherine. 1992. Where Politicians Fear to Tread?European Law Review 17, 2 (April):127–133Google Scholar

Barry, Brian. 1980. Is It Better to Be Powerful or Lucky? Part 2. Political Studies 28, 3 (September):338–352CrossRef Google Scholar

Bates, Robert H. 1988. Contra Contractarianism: Some Reflections on the New Institutionalism. Politics and Society 16:387–401CrossRef Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Baumgartner, Frank R., Jones, Bryan D., and MacLeod., Michael C. 2000. The Evolution of Legislative Jurisdictions. Journal of Politics 62, 2 (May):321–349CrossRef Google Scholar

Bawn, Kathleen. 1993. The Logic of Institutional Preferences: German Electoral Law as a Social Choice Outcome. American Journal of Political Science 37, 4 (November):965–989CrossRef Google Scholar

Baziadoly, Sophie. 1992. Le refus de la décharge par le Parlement Européen. Revue du marché Commun et de l'union européenne 354 (January):58–73Google Scholar

Bednar, Jenna, Ferejohn, John, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 1996. The Politics of European Federalism. International Review of Law and Economics 16, 3 (September): 279–294CrossRef Google Scholar

Bell, Andrew. 1989. Judgments on Majority Voting. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 38 (July):688–689Google Scholar

Bieber, Roland. 1992. Majority Voting and the Cooperation Procedure. In From Luxembourg to Maastricht: Institutional Change in the European Community After the Single European Act, edited by Christian Engel and Wolfgang Wessels, 51–65. Bonn: European Union Verlag

Binder, Sarah A. 1996. The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice: Allocating Parliamentary Rights in the House, 1789–1990. American Political Science Review 90, 1 (March):8–20CrossRef Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah A. 1997. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press

Binder, Sarah A., and Steven S. Smith. 1997. Politics or Principle: Filibustering in the United States Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution

Binder, Sarah, and Smith, Steven S.. 1998. Political Goals and Procedural Choice in the Senate. Journal of Politics 60, 2 (May):398–416CrossRef Google Scholar

Blanquet, Marc. 1998. Le Contrôle Parlementaire Européen sur la crise de la “vache folle.”Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union européenne 420 (July–August):457–467Google Scholar

Blumann, Claude. 1988. L'affaire des hormones devant la Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes. Cahiers de Droit Européen 168 (December):505–513Google Scholar

Blumann, Claude. 1996. Politique Agricole Commune: Droit communautaire agricole et agro-alimentaire. Paris: Litec

Blumann, Claude, and Adam, Valérie. 1997. La politique agricole commune dans la tourmente: la crise de la “vache folle”. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen 33, 2 (April–June):239–293Google Scholar

Bos, Pierre V. F. 1991. The Proposed Regulation on the Supervision and Control of Movement of Waste: Some Comments. In Current EC Legal Developments: EC Environment and Planning Law, edited by David Vaughan, 150–168. London: Butterworth

Bradley, Kieran St. C. 1988. The European Court and the Legal Basis of Community Legislation. European Law Review 13, 6 (December):379–402Google Scholar

Bradley, Kieran St. C. 1992. L'arrêt dioxyde de titane: un jugement de Salomon?Cahiers de Droit Européen 5/6:609–630Google Scholar

Bräuninger, Thomas, et al. 2001. The Dynamics of European Integration: A Constitutional Analysis of the Amsterdam Treaty. In The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe, edited by Gerald Schneider and Mark Aspinwall, 46–68. Manchester: Manchester University Press

Bridge, John. 1988. Note on Cases 68/86 (Hormones) and 131/86 (Battery Hens). Common Market Law Review 25, 4 (Winter):733–742Google Scholar

Bromley, Daniel W. 1989. Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy. New York: Basil Blackwell

Buchwitz, Rebekka. 1998. A Positive Analysis of European Deregulation. Aussenwirtschaft 53, 4 (December):553–571Google Scholar

Budge, Ian. 2001. Validating Party Position Placements. British Journal of Political Science 31, 1 (January):210–223CrossRef Google Scholar

Budge, Ian, et al., eds. 2001. Mapping Preferences: Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. London: Oxford University Press

Burhenne, Wolfgang E., and Schoenbaum, Thomas J.. 1973. The European Community and Management of the Environment: A Dilemma. Natural Resources Journal 13:494–503Google Scholar

Burley, Anne-Marie, and Mattli, Walter. 1993. Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. International Organization 47 (Winter):41–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Calvert, Randall L. 1995a. Rational Actors, Equilibrium, and Social Institutions. In Explaining Social Institutions, edited by Jack Knight and Itai Sened, 57–93. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Calvert, Randall L. 1995b. The Rational Choice Theory of Social Institutions: Cooperation, Coordination, and Communication. In Modern Political Economy: Old Topics, New Directions, edited by Jeffrey S. Banks and Eric A. Hanushek, 216–267. New York: Cambridge University Press

Cammack, Paul. 1992. The New Institutionalism: Predatory Rule, Institutional Persistence, and Macro-Social Change. Economy and Society 21, 4 (November):397–429CrossRef Google Scholar

Carpentier, Michel. 1972. L'action de la Communauté en matière d'environnement. Revue du Marché Commun, 153:381–394Google Scholar

Carrubba, Clifford J., and Volden, Craig. 2001. Explaining Institutional Change in the European Union: What Determines the Voting Rule in the Council of Ministers?European Union Politics 2, 1:5–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Carrubba, Clifford J., et al. 2003. Off the Record: Unrecorded Legislative Votes, Selection Bias, and Roll-Call Vote Analysis. Unpublished manuscript

Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47, 2 (Spring):175–205CrossRef Google Scholar

Chisholm, Donald. 1995. Problem Solving and Institutional Design. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 5, 4 (October):451–491Google Scholar

Clayton, Cornell W., and Howard Gilman, eds. 1999. Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Close, George. 1978. Harmonisation of Laws: Use or Abuse of the Powers Under the EEC Treaty?European Law Review 3:461–481Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. 1937/1988. The Nature of the Firm. In The Firm, the Market, and the Law, 33–55. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Cohen, Michael D., March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1972. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 1 (March):1–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Collins, Ken. 1995. Plans and Prospects for the European Parliament in Shaping Future Environmental Policy. European Environmental Law Review 4, 3 (March):74–77Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities [CEC]. 1971a. Fourth General Report on the Activities of the Communities, 1970. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, February

Commission of the European Communities [CEC]. 1971b. SEC (71) 2616 final. First Communication of the Commission About the Community's Policy on the Environment. 22 July

Commission of the European Communities [CEC]. 1995. Report on the Operation of the Treaty on European Union. SEC(95) 731 final, 10 May

Common Market Law Review. 1982. The Vote on Agricultural Prices: A New Departure? 19, 3 (August):371–372

Conant, Lisa J. 1998. Contained Justice: The Politics Behind Europe's Rule of Law. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Washington, Seattle

Corbett, Richard. 1989. Testing the New Procedures: The European Parliament's First Experiences with Its New “Single Act” Powers. Journal of Common Market Studies 27, 4 (June):359–372CrossRef Google Scholar

Corbett, Richard. 1998. The European Parliament's Role in Closer European Union Integration. London: Palgrave Macmillan

Corbett, Richard, Francis Jacobs, and Michael Shackleton. 2000. The European Parliament, 4th edition. London: John Harper Publishing

Corbett, Richard, and Otto Schmuck. 1992. The New Procedures of the European Community After the Single European Act: Efficiency and Legitimacy in the Light of Experience. In From Luxembourg to Maastricht: Institutional Change in the European Community After the Single European Act, edited by Christian Engel and Wolfgang Wessels, 33–49. Bonn: European Union Verlag

Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press

Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1995. Bonding, Structure, and the Stability of Political Parties: Party Government in the House. In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions, edited by Kenneth A. Shepsle and Barry R. Weingast, 101–118. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1997. Toward a Theory of Legislative Rules Changes: Assessing Schickler and Rich's Evidence. American Journal of Political Science 41:1376–1386CrossRef Google Scholar

Crombez, Christophe. 1996. Legislative Procedures in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science 26 (April):199–228CrossRef Google Scholar

Crombez, Christophe. 1997a. The Co-Decision Procedure in the European Union. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22, 1 (February):97–119CrossRef Google Scholar

Crombez, Christophe. 1997b. Policy Making and Commission Appointment in the European Union. Aussenwirtschaft 52, 1/2:63–82Google Scholar

Crombez, Christophe. 2000. Institutional Reform and Co-Decision in the European Union. Constitutional Political Economy 11:41–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Crombez, Christophe. 2001. The Treaty of Amsterdam and the Co-Decision Procedure. In The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe, edited by Mark Aspinwall and Gerald Schneider, 101–122. Manchester: Manchester University Press

Crosby, Scott. 1991. The Single Market and the Rule of Law. European Law Review 16, 6 (December):451–465Google Scholar

Cullen, Holly, and Charlesworth, Andrew. 1999. Diplomacy by Other Means: The Use of Legal Basis Litigation as a Political Strategy by the European Parliament and Member States. Common Market Law Review 36, 6 (December):1243–1270CrossRef Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre. 1993. The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces. Common Market Law Review 30, 1 (February):17–69Google Scholar

Dashwood, Alan. 1989. Majority Voting in the Council. In Legislation for Europe 1992, edited by Jürgen Schwarze, 79–83. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft

Dashwood, Alan. 2001. The Constitution of the European Union After Nice: Law-Making Procedures. European Law Review 26, 3:215–238Google Scholar

David, Paul A. 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review 75, 2 (May):332–338Google Scholar

David, Paul A. 1994. Why Are Institutions the ‘Carriers of History’? Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations, and Institutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 5, 2:205–220CrossRef Google Scholar

de Ruyt, Jean. 1989. L'Acte unique Européen: Commentaire, 2nd edition. Brussels: Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles

Sadeleer, Nicolas. 1991. Le Droit Communautaire de l'Environnement, un droit sous-tendu par les seuls motifs économiques?Aménagement-Environnement 4:217–223Google Scholar

Sadeleer, Nicolas. 1993a. Case Note C-155/91, Commission v. Council. Journal of Environmental Law 5, 2:295–300Google Scholar

Sadeleer, Nicolas. 1993b. La querelle sur le choix de la base juridique des actes communautaires relatifs à la protection de l'environnement, suite et fin?Aménagement-Environnement 2:81–85Google Scholar

Sadeleer, Nicolas. 1993c. La question de la base juridique des actes communautaires ayant trait à la protection de l'environnement: symbiose ou opposition entre la politique d'établissement du marché intérieur et la politique de protection de l'environnement?Revue Juridique de l'Environnement 4:597–616Google Scholar

Sadeleer, Nicolas. 1994. La circulation des déchets et le Marché unique européen. Revue du Marché Unique Européen 1:71–116Google Scholar

Debroux, Xavier. 1995. Le choix de la base juridique dans l'action environnementale de l'Union Européenne. Cahiers de Droit Européen 3/4:383–397Google Scholar

Demaris, Alfred. 1992. Logit Modeling: Practical Applications. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, Number 86. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Deniau, Xavier. 1984. Le vote au sein du Conseil des Ministres des Communautés Européennes: Théorie et pratique. Revue du Marché Commun 279 (July–August):316–318Google Scholar

Denzau, Arthur T., and Mackay, Robert J.. 1983. Gatekeeping and Monopoly Power of Committees: An Analysis of Sincere and Sophisticated Behavior. American Journal of Political Science 27:740–761CrossRef Google Scholar

Dewost, Jean-Louis. 1980. Les relations entre le Conseil et la Commission dans le processus de décision Communautaire. Revue du Marché Commun 238 (June–July):289–294Google Scholar

Dewost, Jean-Louis. 1984. L'avenir du fonctionnement des Institutions: Le Conseil. Annales de la Faculté de Droit, d'économie et de sciences sociales de Liège 29, 4:293–305Google Scholar

Dewost, Jean-Louis. 1987. Le vote majoritaire: simple modalité de gestion ou enjeu politique essentielle? In Du Droit International au Droit de l'intégration, edited by F. Capotorti et al., 167–175. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft

Dewost, Jean-Louis. 1989. Rôle et position de la Commission dans le processus législatif. In Legislation for Europe 1992, edited by Jürgen Schwarze, 85–96. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft

Diermeier, Daniel, and Krehbiel, Keith. 2003. Institutionalism as a Methodology. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15, 2:123–144CrossRef Google Scholar

Dion, Douglas. 1997. Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew: Minority Rights and Procedural Change in Legislative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Dion, Douglas, and Huber, John. 1996. Procedural Choice and the House Committee on Rules. Journal of Politics 58:25–54CrossRef Google Scholar

Dion, Douglas, and Huber, John. 1997. Sense and Sensibility: The Role of Rules. American Journal of Political Science 41:945–957CrossRef Google Scholar

Dogan, Rhys. 1997. Comitology: Little Procedures with Big Implications. West European Politics 20, 3 (Winter):31–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Dowding, Keith. 2000. Institutionalist Research on the European Union. European Union Politics 1, 1:125–144CrossRef Google Scholar

Earnshaw, David, and Judge, David. 1993. The European Parliament and the Sweeteners Directive: From Footnote to Inter-Institutional Conflict. Journal of Common Market Studies 31, 1 (March):103–116CrossRef Google Scholar

Earnshaw, David, and Judge, David. 1997. The Life and Times of the European Union's Co-operation Procedure. Journal of Common Market Studies 35, 4 (December):543–564CrossRef Google Scholar

Elles, Lady Diana. 1989. The innovations introduced by the Single European Act: Some Big Steps Forward. In Legislation for Europe 1992, edited by Jürgen Schwarze, 45–51. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft

Emiliou, Nicholas. 1994. Opening Pandora's Box: The Legal Basis of Community Measures Before the Court of Justice. European Law Review 19:488–507Google Scholar

Ensminger, Jean, and Knight, Jack. 1997. Changing Social Norms: Common Property, Bridewealth, and Clan Exogamy. Current Anthropology 38:1–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press

European Law Review. 1982. Overriding the British Farm Price “Veto.” 7, 3 (June):145–146

European Parliament [European Parliament]. 1970. PE Doc. 161/70, Rapport fait au nom de la commission des affaires sociales et de la santé publique sur la lutte contre la pollution des eaux fluviales et notamment des eaux du Rhin [Rapporteur: M. Boersma]. 11 November

European Parliament [European Parliament]. 1972. PE Doc. 9/72, Rapport fait au nom de la commission des affaires sociales et de la santé publique sur la première communication de la Commission des Communautés européennes sur la politique de la Communauté en matière d'environnement [Rapporteur: Jahn]. 14 April

European Parliament [European Parliament]. 1999. The European Union and Food Security: Lessons from the Bovine spongiform encephalopathy Crisis. Luxembourg: OOPEC

Farrell, Henry, and Héritier, Adrienne. 2003. Formal and Informal Institutions Under Codecision: Continuous Constitution-Building in Europe. Governance 16, 4 (October):577–600CrossRef Google Scholar

Field, Alexander James. 1979. On the Explanation of Rules Using Rational Choice Models. Journal of Economic Issues 13:49–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Field, Alexander James. 1981. The Problem with Neoclassical Institutional Economics: A Critique with Special Reference to the North/Thomas Model of Pre-1500 Europe. Explorations in Economic History 18:174–198CrossRef Google Scholar

Field, Alexander James. 1984. Microeconomics, Norms, and Rationality. Economic Development and Cultural Change 32, 4 (July):683–711CrossRef Google Scholar

Firmin-Sellers, Kathryn. 1996. The Transformation of Property Rights in the Gold Coast: An Empirical Analysis Applying Rational Choice Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press

Fitzmaurice, John. 1988. An Analysis of the European Community's Co-Operation Procedure. Journal of Common Market Studies 26, 4 (June):389–400CrossRef Google Scholar

Flynn, James. 1987. How Will Article 100A(4) Work? A Comparison with Article 93. Common Market Law Review 24:689–707Google Scholar

Franchino, Fabio. 2000. Control of the Commission's Executive Functions: Uncertainty, Conflict, and Decision Rules. European Union Politics 1, 1:63–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Franchino, Fabio. 2002. Efficiency or Credibility? Testing the Two Logics of Delegation to the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy 9, 5 (October):677–694CrossRef Google Scholar

Freestone, David, and Ryland, Diane. 1994. EC Environmental Law after Maastricht. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 45, 2 (Summer):152–176Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1953. The Methodology of Positive Economics. In Essays in Positive Economics, 3–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Garcia, Thierry. 1997. Crise de la “Vache Folle,” Crise dans l'Union Européenne. Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union européenne 407 (April):243–252Google Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey. 1992. International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community's Internal Market. International Organization 46, 2 (Spring):533–560CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995a. From the Luxembourg Compromise to Codecision: Decision Making in the European Union. Electoral Studies 14:289–308CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995b. The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization 49, 1 (Winter):171–182CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey, Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Schulz, Heiner. 1998. The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization 52, 1 (Winter):149–176CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey, and Tsebelis, George. 1996. An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism. International Organization 50, 2 (Spring):237–268Google Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey, and Tsebelis, George. 1998. More on the Co-Decision Endgame. Journal of Legislative Studies 3, 4 (Winter):139–143CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey, and Tsebelis, George. 2001. Understanding Better the European Union Legislative Process (in “Forum Section: The European Union Legislative Process: Academics vs. Practitioners – Round 2”). European Union Politics 2, 3 (October): 353–361CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey, and Barry R. Weingast. 1993. Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community's Internal Market. In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, edited by Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane, 173–206. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Geradin, Damien. 1993a. The Legal Basis of the Waste Directive. European Law Review 18, 5 (October):418–427Google Scholar

Geradin, Damien. 1993b. Trade and Environmental Protection: Community Harmonization and National Environmental Standards. Yearbook of European Law 13:151–199CrossRef Google Scholar

Geradin, Damien. 1995. Balancing Free Trade and Environment Protection: The Interplay Between the European Court of Justice and the Community Legislator. In Trade and The Environment: The Search for Balance, edited by James Cameron, Paul Demaret, and Damien Geradin, 204–241. London: Cameron May

Gerard, Alain. 1975. Les limites et les moyens juridiques de l'intervention des Communautés Européennes en matière de l'environnement. Cahiers de Droit Européen 11, 1–2:14–30Google Scholar

Goldberg, Victor P. 1974. Institutional Change and the Quasi-Invisible Hand. Journal of Law and Economics 17:461–492CrossRef Google Scholar

Golub, Jonathan. 1997. In the Shadow of the Vote? Decisionmaking Efficiency in the European Community 1974–1995. Member of parliamentlfG Discussion Paper 97/3. Cologne: Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, December

Golub, Jonathan. 1999. In the Shadow of the Vote? Decision Making in the European Community. International Organization 53, 4 (Autumn):733–764CrossRef Google Scholar

Golub, Jonathan. 2002. Institutional Reform and Decisionmaking in the European Union. In Institutional Challenges in the European Union, edited by Madeleine Hosli and Adrian van Deemen. London: Routledge

Goodin, Robert E. 1996a. Institutions and Their Design. In The Theory of Institutional Design, edited by Robert E. Goodin, 1–53. New York: Cambridge University Press

Goodin, Robert E., ed. 1996b. The Theory of Institutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press

Gosalbo Bono, Ricardo. 1994. Co-Decision: An Appraisal of the Experience of the European Parliament as Co-Legislator. Yearbook of European Law 14:21–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Goybet, Catherine. 1997. La Vache Folle Fera-t-elle Évoluer l'Europe?Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union européenne no. 407 (April):229–232Google Scholar

Grabitz, Eberhard, and Christoph Sasse. 1977. Competence of the European Communities for Environmental Policy: Proposal for an Amendment to the Treaty of Rome. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag

Grafstein, Robert. 1992. Institutional Realism: Social and Political Constraints on Rational Actors. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Granovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, 3 (November):481–510CrossRef Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark. 1992. Economic Institutions as Social Constructions: A Framework for Analysis. Acta Sociologica 35:3–11CrossRef Google Scholar

Greenpeace International. 1991. The Single European Dump: Free Trade in Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes in the New Europe. Available at URL http://www.greenpeace.org/gopher/campaigns/toxics/1991/eurodump.txt (accessed 26 June 2001). 4 December

Gruber, Lloyd. 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Gulmann, Claus. 1987. The Single European Act–Some Remarks from a Danish Perspective. Common Market Law Review 24:31–40Google Scholar

Hall, Peter A., and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44 (December):936–957CrossRef Google Scholar

Hannequart, Jean-Pierre. 1979. Le Parlement européen et l'environnement. Res Publica 21, 1:127–143Google Scholar

Harsanyi, John C. 1969. Rational-Choice Models of Political Behavior vs. Functionalist and Conformist Theories. World Politics 21, 4 (July):513–538CrossRef Google Scholar

Hildyard, Nicholas. 1993. Maastricht: The Protectionism of Free Trade. Ecologist 23, 2 (March/April):45–51Google Scholar

Hix, Simon. 1999a. Constitutional Agenda-Setting Through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA, 2–5 September

Hix, Simon. 1999b. The Political System of the European Union. New York: St. Martin's Press

Hix, Simon. 2002. Constitutional Agenda-Setting Through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam. British Journal of Political Science 32, 2 (April):259–280CrossRef Google Scholar

Hix, Simon, Kreppel, Amie, and Noury, Abdul. 2003. The Party System in the European Parliament: Collusive or Competitive?Journal of Common Market Studies 41, 2:309–331CrossRef Google Scholar

Hix, Simon, Abdul Noury, and Gérard Roland. 2003. Power to the Parties: Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001. Unpublished manuscript, URL http://www.lse-students.ac.uk/HIX/Working%20Papers/HNR-Power%20to%20the%20Parties-June03.pdf (last consulted 1 July 2003)

Hooghe, Liesbet. 1999a. Images of Europe: Orientations to European Integration Among Senior Commission Officials. British Journal of Political Science 29, 2:345–373CrossRef Google Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet. 1999b. Supranational Activists or Intergovernmental Agents? Explaining Orientations of Senior Commission Officials Towards European Integration. Comparative Political Studies 32, 4:435–463CrossRef Google Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet. 2001. Top Commission Officials on Capitalism: An Institutionalist Understanding of Preferences. In The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe, edited by Mark Aspinwall and Gerald Schneider, 152–173. Manchester: Manchester University Press

Hooghe, Liesbet. 2002. The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002CrossRef

Horn, Murray J. 1995. The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional Choice in the Public Sector. New York: Cambridge University Press

House of Commons Select Committee on European Legislation. 1984. First Special Report, Session 1983–84, HC 126–ⅳ. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office

House of Commons Select Committee on European Legislation. 1988. Choice of Treaty Base after the Single European Act, Session 1987–88, HC 178–ⅳ and 178–ⅴ. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office

House of Lords Select Committee on the European Communities. 1978. Approximation of Laws Under Article 100 of the EEC Treaty. Session 1977–78, 22nd Report. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office

Huber, John D. 1992. Restrictive Legislative Procedures in France and the United States. American Political Science Review 86:675–687CrossRef Google Scholar

Huber, John D. 1996. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. New York: Cambridge University Press

Hubschmid, Claudia, and Moser, Peter. 1997. The Co-operation Procedure in the European Union: Why Was the European Parliament Influential in the Decision on Car Emission Standards?Journal of Common Market Studies 35:225–242CrossRef Google Scholar

Hug, Simon. 1997. The Commission as a Pawn to the Member Countries: Comment to Christophe Crombez. Aussenwirtschaft 52, 1/2:83–86Google Scholar

Hug, Simon. 2003. Endogenous Preferences and Delegation in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36, 1/2:41–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Hug, Simon, and König, Thomas. 2002. In View of Ratification: Governmental Preferences and Domestic Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference. International Organization 56, 2 (Spring 2002):447–476CrossRef Google Scholar

Immergut, Ellen M. 1998. The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism. Politics & Society 26, 1 (March):5–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Jacqué, Jean-Paul. 1986. The “Single European Act” and Environmental Policy. Environmental Policy and Law 16:122–124Google Scholar

Judge, David. 1993. “Predestined to Save the Earth”: The Environment Committee of the European Parliament. In A Green Dimension for the European Community: Political Issues and Processes, edited by David Judge, 186–212. London: Frank Cass

Judge, David, and David, Earnshaw. 1994. Weak European Parliament Influence? A Study of the Environment Committee of the European Parliament. Government and Opposition 29, 2 (Spring):262–276CrossRef Google Scholar

Judge, David, David, Earnshaw, and Ngaire, Cowan. 1994. Ripples or Waves? The European Parliament in the European Community Policy Process. Journal of European Public Policy 1, 1 (June):27–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Jupille, Joseph. 1996. Free Movement of Goods and Hazardous Waste: Reconciling the Single Market with Environmental Imperatives. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association (ISA), San Diego, CA, 6–20 April

Jupille, Joseph. 1999. The European Union and International Outcomes. International Organization 53, 2 (Spring):409–425CrossRef Google Scholar

Jupille, Joseph, and James, A. Caporaso. 1999. Institutionalism and the European Union: Beyond International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2:409–425CrossRef Google Scholar

Jupille, Joseph, Caporaso, James A., and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2003. Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36, 1–2 (February/March):7–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Kapteyn, P. J. G., and P. VerLoren van Themaat. 1998. Introduction to the Law of the European Communities: From Maastricht to Amsterdam, 3rd edition. London: Kluwer Law International

Kato, Junko. 1996. Institutions and Rationality in Politics: Three Varieties of Neo-Institutionalists. British Journal of Political Science 26, 4:553–582CrossRef Google Scholar

Keeler, John T. S. 1993. Executive Power and Policymaking Patterns in France: Gauging the Impact of Fifth Republic Institutions. West European Politics 16 (October):518–544CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelemen, R. Daniel. 1995. Environmental Policy in the European Union: The Struggle Between Court, Commission and Council. In Convergence or Diversity? Internationalization and Economic Policy Response, edited by Birgitte Unger and Frans Van Waarden, 306–332. Brookfield: Averbury

Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Kim, Hee-Min, and Richard C. Fording. 2001. Extending Party Estimates to Governments and Electors. In Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998, edited by Ian Budge et al., 157–178. New York: Oxford University Press

King, David C. 1997. Turf Wars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

King, Gary, and Langche, Zeng. 2001a. Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data. Political Analysis 9, 2:137–163CrossRef Google Scholar

King, Gary, and Langche, Zeng. 2001b. Explaining Rare Events in International Relations. International Organization 55, 3 (Summer):693–715CrossRef Google Scholar

Kirchner, Emil, and Williams, Karen. 1983. The Legal, Political and Institutional Implications of the 1980 Isoglucose Judgements. Journal of Common Market Studies 22 (2):173–190CrossRef Google Scholar

Kiser, Larry L., and Elinor Ostrom. 1982. The Three Worlds of Action: A Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches. In Strategies of Political Inquiry, edited by Elinor Ostrom, 179–219. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications

Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press

Knill, Christophe, and Andrea, Lenschow. 2001. “Seek and Ye Shall Find!” Linking Different Perspectives on Institutional Change. Comparative Political Studies 34, 2 (March):187–215CrossRef Google Scholar

Koelble, Thomas A. 1995. The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology. Comparative Politics 27, 2 (January):231–243CrossRef Google Scholar

König, Thomas. 2001. Pivotal Politics in European Legislation: An Event History Analysis of the European Union Legislative Decision-Making Process from 1984 to 1995. Delivered at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Grenoble, France

König, Thomas, and Thomas, Bräuninger. 2000. Decisiveness and Inclusiveness: Two Aspects of the Intergovernmental Choice of European Voting Rules. Homo Oeconomicus 17, 1/2:1–17Google Scholar

König, Thomas, and Mirja, Pöter. 2001. Examining the European Union Legislative Process. European Union Politics 2, 3 (October):329–352CrossRef Google Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal, eds. 2001. The Rational Design of International Institutions. Special issue of International Organization (vol. 55. n. 4)

Krämer, Ludwig. 1987. The Single European Act and Environmental Protection: Reflections on Several New Provisions in Community Law. Common Market Law Review 24:659–688Google Scholar

Krämer, Ludwig. 1991. Community Environmental Law: Towards a Systematic Approach. Yearbook of European Law 11:151–184CrossRef Google Scholar

Krämer, Ludwig. 1992. Focus on European Environmental Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell

Krämer, Ludwig. 1993. European Environmental Law Casebook. London: Sweet & Maxwell

Krämer, Ludwig. 1998. E. C. Treaty and Environmental Law, 3rd edition. London: Sweet and Maxwell

Krämer, Ludwig. N.d. La base juridique dans le domaine de l'environnement: articles 100A et 130S du traité. European Commission unnumbered memo

Kranz, Jerzy. 1982. Le vote dans la pratique du Conseil des ministres des Communautés européennes. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen 18, 3 (July–September):403–430Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. 1984. Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics. Comparative Politics 16, 2 (January):223–246CrossRef Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. 1985. Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism. Berkeley: University of California Press

Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics 43:336–366CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1986. Unanimous Consent Agreements: Going Along in the Senate. Journal of Politics 48, 3 (August):541–564CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1988. Spatial Models of Legislative Choice. Legislative Studies Quarterly 13, 3 (August):259–319CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Krehbiel, Keith. 1997a. Restrictive rules reconsidered. American Journal of Political Science 41:919–947CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1997b. Rejoinder to “Sense and Sensibility.”American Journal of Political Science 41:958–964CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Krehbiel, Keith, and Douglas, Rivers. 1988. The Analysis of Committee Power: An Application to Senate Voting on the Minimum Wage. American Journal of Political Science 32, 4 (November):1151–1174CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith, Kenneth, A. Shepsle, and Barry, R. Weingast. 1987. Why Are Congressional Committees Powerful?American Political Science Review 81, 3 (September):929–945CrossRef Google Scholar

Kreppel, Amie. 1999. What Affects the European Parliament's Legislative Influence? An Analysis of the Success of European Parliament Amendments. Journal of Common Market Studies 37, 3 (September): 521–538CrossRef Google Scholar

Kreppel, Amie. 2000. Rules, Ideology and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Past Present and Future. European Union Politics 1, 3:340–362CrossRef Google Scholar

Kreppel, Amie. 2002a. The European Parliament and the Supranational Party System: A Study of Institutional Development. New York: Cambridge University Press

Kreppel, Amie. 2002b. Moving Beyond Procedure: An Empirical Analysis of European Parliament Legislative Influence. Comparative Political Studies 35, 7:784–813CrossRef Google Scholar

Kreppel, Amie, and Simon, Hix. 2003. From “Grand Coalition” to Left-Right Confrontation: Explaining the Shifting Structure of Party Competition in the European Parliament. Comparative Political Studies 36, 1–2:75–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Kreppel, Amie, and George, Tsebelis. 1999. Coalition Formation in the European Parliament. Comparative Political Studies 32, 8:933–66CrossRef Google Scholar

Lange, Peter. 1993. Maastricht and the Social Protocol: Why Did They Do It?Politics & Society 21 (March):5–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Langeheine, Bernd. 1989. Le rapprochement des législations nationales selon l'article 100A du traité CEE: L'harmonisation communautaire face aux exigences de protection nationales. Revue du Marché Commun 328 (June):347–359Google Scholar

Laver, Michael, and John, Garry. 2000. Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts. American Journal of Political Science 44:619–634CrossRef Google Scholar

Laver, Michael, and W. Ben Hunt. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge

Lenaerts, Koen. 1992. Some Thoughts About the Interaction Between Judges and Politicians in the European Community. Yearbook of European Law 12:1–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Lenaerts, Koen. 1994. The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Environment in the European Union: Keeping the Balance of Federalism. Fordham International Law Journal 17, 4:846–895Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press

Levi, Margaret. 1990. A Logic of Institutional Change. In The Limits of Rationality, edited by Karen Schweers Cook and Margaret Levi, 402–418. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Liao, Tim Futing. 1994. Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Lijphart, Arend. 1975. The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative Political Studies 8, 2 (July):158–177CrossRef Google Scholar

Lodge, Juliet. 1987. The Single European Act and the New Legislative Cooperation Procedure: A Critical Analysis. Journal of European Integration 11, 1 (Fall):5–28CrossRef Google Scholar

London, Caroline, and Michael Llamas. 1995. Protection of the Environment and the Free Movement of Goods. London: Butterworths

Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Lord Cockfield. 1994. The European Union: Creating the Single Market. London: Wiley Chancery Law

Lord Slynn of Hadley. 1993. Looking at European Community Texts. Statute Law Review 14, 1 (Summer):12–27CrossRef

Lowndes, Vivien. 1996. Varieties of New Institutionalism: A Critical Appraisal. Public Administration 74 (Summer):181–197CrossRef Google Scholar

Macrory, Richard. 1991. European Court Shakes Up Legal Basis of EEC Environmental Policy. ENDS Report 197 (June):15–16Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico. 1989. Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Majone, Giandomenico. 1993. The European Community Between Social Policy and Social Regulation. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (June):153–170CrossRef Google Scholar

Mann, Michael. 1984. The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms, and Results. Archives européennes de sociologie 25:185–213CrossRef Google Scholar

March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Basic Books

Marks, Gary, and Liesbet Hooghe. 2001. Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield

Marks, Gary, Liesbet, Hooghe, and Kermit, Blank. 1996. European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-Level Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies 34, 3 (September):341–377CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, Lisa L. 1993. International and Domestic Institutions in the Economic and Monetary Union Process. Economics and Politics 5, 2 (July):125–144CrossRef Google Scholar

Matthews, R. C. O. 1986. The Economics of Institutions and the Sources of Growth. Economic Journal 96 (December):903–918CrossRef Google Scholar

Mattila, Mikko, and Jan-Erik, Lane. 2001. Why Unanimity in the Council? A Roll Call Analysis of Council Voting. European Union Politics 2, 1:31–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Mattli, Walter. 2001. Private Justice in a Global Economy: From Litigation to Arbitration. International Organization 55, 4 (Autumn):919–948CrossRef Google Scholar

Mattli, Walter, and Anne-Marie, Slaughter. 1995. Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett. International Organization 49, 1 (Winter):183–190CrossRef Google Scholar

Mattli, Walter, and Anne-Marie, Slaughter. 1998. Revisiting the European Court of Justice. International Organization 52, 1 (Winter):177–210CrossRef Google Scholar

Maurer, Andreas. 2001. Democratic Governance in the European Union: The Institutional Terrain After Amsterdam. In The Treaty of Amsterdam: Challenges and Opportunities for the European Union, edited by Jörg Monar and Wolfgang Wessels. London: Continuum

Maurer, Andreas, Wolfgang Wessels, and Jürgen Mittag. 2000. Europeanisation in and of the European Union System: Trends, Offers, and Constraints. Paper for the DFG workshop “Linking European Union and National Governance,” Mannheim, Germany, 1–3 June

McCormick, John. 2001. Environmental Policy in the European Union. New York: Palgrave

McCown, Margaret. 2001. The Use of Judge-made Law in European Judicial Integration: Precedent‍based Arguments in European Union Inter‍institutional Disputes. Presented at the 7th Biennial Conference of the European Community Studies Association (ECSA), Madison, WI, 30 May–2 June 2001

McCown, Margaret. 2003. The European Parliament Before the Bench: ECJ Precedent and European Parliament Litigation Strategies. Journal of European Public Policy 10, 6 (December):974–995CrossRef Google Scholar

McKelvey, Richard D. 1976. Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control. Journal of Economic Theory 12:472–482CrossRef Google Scholar

McKelvey, Richard D., and Peter, C. Ordeshook. 1984. An Experimental Study of the Effects of Procedural Rules on Committee Behavior. Journal of Politics 46, 1 (February):182–205CrossRef Google Scholar

McNiel, Dale E. 1998. The first case under the WTO's Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement: The European Union's Hormone Ban. Virginia Journal of International Law 39, 1 (Fall):89–134Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J. 1994/95. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19, 3 (Winter):5–49CrossRef Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J. 1995. A Realist Reply. International Security 20, 1 (Summer):82–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Menard, Scott. 1995. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, Number 07–106. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Milas, René. 1985. La concurrence entre les bases légales des actes communautaires. Revue du Marché commun no. 289 (July–August):445–448Google Scholar

Milgrom, Paul R., Douglass, C. North, and Barry, R. Weingast. 1990. The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs. Economics and Politics 2:1–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. 1990. Bargaining Costs, Influence Costs, and the Organization of Economic Activity. In Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, edited by James E. Alt and Kenneth A. Shepsle, 57–89. New York: Cambridge University Press

Moberg, Axel. 2002. The Nice Treaty and Voting Rules in the Council. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2):259–282CrossRef Google Scholar

Moe, Terry M. 1990a. Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6 (Special Issue):213–266CrossRef Google Scholar

Moe, Terry M. 1990b. The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy. In Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, edited by Oliver E. Williamson, 116–153. New York: Oxford University Press

Moravcsik, Andrew. 1991. Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community. International Organization 45 (Winter):19–56CrossRef Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31, 4 (December):473–524CrossRef Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. 1995. Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder. Journal of Common Market Studies 33, 4 (December):611–628CrossRef Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51, 4 (Autumn):513–554CrossRef Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Moravcsik, Andrew. 1999a. The Choice for Europe: Current Commentary and Future Research: A Response to James Caporaso, Fritz Scharpf, and Helen Wallace. Journal of European Public Policy 6, 1 (March):155–179Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. 1999b. The Future of European Integration Studies: Social Science or Social Theory?Millennium 28, 2:371–391CrossRef Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew, and Kalypso, Nicolaïdis. 1999. Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, and Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 37, 1 (March):59–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Moser, Peter. 1996. The European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter: What Are the Conditions?American Political Science Review 90:834–838CrossRef Google Scholar

Moser, Peter. 1997a. A Theory of the Conditional Influence of the European Parliament in the Cooperation Procedure. Public Choice 91:333–350CrossRef Google Scholar

Moser, Peter. 1997b. The Benefits of the Conciliation Procedure for the European Parliament: Comment to George Tsebelis. Aussenwirtschaft 52, 1/2:57–62Google Scholar

Moser, Peter. 1999. The Impact of Legislative Institutions on Public Policy: A Survey. European Journal of Political Economy 15:1–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Müller, Wolfgang C., and Kaare Str⊘m, eds. 1999. Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press

Nicoll, William. 1984. The Luxembourg Compromise. Journal of Common Market Studies 23, 1 (September):35–43CrossRef Google Scholar

Nicoll, William. 1988. Le Dialogue Législatif entre le Parlement Européen et la Commission: La procédure de renvoi en commission du Parlement Européen. Revue du Marché Commun 316 (April):240–242Google Scholar

Niskanen, William A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine

North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton

North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press

North, Douglass C., and Robert Paul Thomas. 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. New York: Cambridge University Press

Oberschall, Anthony, and Eric, M. Leifer. 1986. Efficiency and Social Institutions: Uses and Misuses of Economic Reasoning in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 12:233–253CrossRef Google Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J. 2001. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 5th edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press

O'Neill, Michael. 1994. The Choice of Legal Basis: More Than a Number. Irish Journal of European Law 1:44–58Google Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press

Ostrom, Elinor. 1995. Constituting Social Capital and Collective Action. In Local Commons and Global Interdependence: Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains, edited by Robert O. Keohane and Elinor Ostrom, 125–160. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Pescatore, Pierre. 1987. Some Critical Remarks on the “Single European Act.”Common Market Law Review 24, 1 (Spring):9–18Google Scholar

Peter, Bertrand. 1994. La Base Juridique des Actes en Droit Communautaire. Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union Européenne no. 378 (May):324–333Google Scholar

Peters, B. Guy. 1991. Bureaucratic Politics and the Institutions of the European Community. In Euro-Politics: Institutions and Policymaking in the “New” European Community, edited by Alberta M. Sbragia, 75–122. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution

Peters, B. Guy. 1994. Agenda-setting in the European Community. Journal of European Public Policy 1, 1 (June):9–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. 1996. The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis. Comparative Political Studies 29, 2 (April):123–163CrossRef Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. 2000a. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94, 2 (June):251–268CrossRef Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. 2000b. The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change. Governance 13, 4 (October):475–499CrossRef Google Scholar

Pollack, Mark A. 1996. The New Institutionalism and EC Governance: The Promise and Limits of Institutional Analysis. Governance 9, 4 (October):429–458CrossRef Google Scholar

Pollack, Mark A. 1997. Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community. International Organization 51, 1 (Winter):99–134CrossRef Google Scholar

Pollack, Mark A. 2003. The Engines of Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agency Setting in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley Interscience

Rasmussen, Anders. 2000. Institutional Games Rational Actors Play – The Empowering of the European Parliament. European Integration Online Papers 4 (1)Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Hjalte. 1986. On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff

Ray, Leonard. 1999. Measuring Party Orientations Towards European Integration: Results from an Expert Survey. European Journal of Political Research 36:283–306CrossRef Google Scholar

Rehbinder, Eckard, and Richard Stewart. 1985. Integration Through Law, vol. 2, Environmental Protection Policy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter

Rhodes, Martin. 1995. A Regulatory Conundrum: Industrial Relations and the Social Dimension. In European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, edited by Stephan Leibfried and Paul Pierson, 78–122. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution

Riker, William H. 1980. Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions. American Political Science Review 74:432–446CrossRef Google Scholar

Riker, William H. 1983. Political Theory and the Art of Heresthetics. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Ada W. Finifter, 47–67. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association

Riker, William H. 1984. The Heresthetics of Constitution-Making: The Presidency in 1787, with Comments on Determinism and Rational Choice. American Political Science Review 78, 1 (March):1–16CrossRef Google Scholar

Rittberger, Berthold. 2003. The Creation and Empowerment of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies 41, 2 (April):203–225CrossRef Google Scholar

Robinson, Jonathan. 1992. The Legal Basis of EC Environmental Law. Journal of Environmental Law 4, 1:109–120CrossRef Google Scholar

Roselsky, Kurt M. 1993. Legal Basis and International Implications of Council Regulation on the Supervision and Control of Shipments of Hazardous Waste. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 23 (1):111–139Google Scholar

Sandholtz, Wayne. 1996. Membership Matters: Limits of the Functional Approach to European Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 34:403–429CrossRef Google Scholar

Sbragia, Alberta. 1996. Environmental Policy: The “Push-Pull” of Policy-Making. In Policy-Making in the European Union, 3rd edition, edited by Helen Wallace and William Wallace, 235–255. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Selecting Cases and Testing Hypotheses. Journal of European Public Policy 6, 1 (March):164–168Google Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. 2000. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? New York: Oxford University Press

Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston

Schickler, Eric, and Andrew, Rich. 1997a. Controlling the Floor: Parties as Procedural Coalitions in the House. American Journal of Political Science 41:1340–1375CrossRef Google Scholar

Schickler, Eric, and Andrew, Rich. 1997b. Party Government in the House Reconsidered: A Response to Cox and McCubbins. American Journal of Political Science 41:1387–1394CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmidt, Alke. 1995. Trade in Waste Under Community Law. In Trade & The Environment: The Search for Balance, edited by James Cameron, Paul Demaret, and Damien Geradin, 184–203. London: Cameron May

Schneider, Gerald. 2001a. Comment on Hooghe. In The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe, edited by Mark Aspinwall and Gerald Schneider, 174–176. Manchester: Manchester University Press

Schneider, Gerald. 2001b. Ideas, Mad Cows, and European Integration: An Institutionalist Analysis of the Bovine spongiform encephalopathy Crisis. Paper presented at the conference “Institutionalism and the Study of the European Union,” University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 4–5 May

Schneider, Gerald, and Mark Aspinwall, eds. 2001. The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press

Schotter, Andrew. 1981. The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press

Schulz, Heiner, and Thomas, König. 2000. Institutional Reform and Decision-Making Efficiency in the European Union. American Journal of Political Science 44, 4 (October):653–666CrossRef Google Scholar

Scully, Roger M. 1997a. The European Parliament and the Co-Decision Procedure: A Reassessment. Journal of Legislative Studies 3, 3 (Autumn 1997):58–73CrossRef Google Scholar

Scully, Roger M. 1997b. The European Parliament and Co-Decision: A Rejoinder to Tsebelis and Garrett. Journal of Legislative Studies 3, 3 (Autumn 1997):93–103CrossRef Google Scholar

Sebenius, James K. 1983. Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties. International Organization 37, 2 (Spring): 281–316CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979. Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models. American Journal of Political Science 23, 1 (February):27–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1986. Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions. In Political Science: The Science of Politics, edited by Herbert F. Weisberg, 51–81. New York: Agathon Press

Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989. Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1:131–147CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1993. Political Institutions and the New Institutional Economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149 (1):347–350Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry, R. Weingast. 1981. Political Preferences for the Pork Barrel: A Generalization. American Journal of Political Science 25, 1 (February):96–111CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry, R. Weingast. 1984a. Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 28, 1 (February):49–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry, R. Weingast. 1984b. When Do Rules of Procedure Matter?Journal of Politics 46, 1 (February 1984):206–221CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry, R. Weingast. 1987. The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power. American Political Science Review 81:85–104CrossRef Google Scholar

Shvetsova, Olga. Endogenous Selection of Institutions and Their Exogenous Effects. Constitutional Political Economy 14:191–212CrossRef

Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. House Special Rules and the Institutional Design Controversy. In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions, edited by Kenneth A. Shepsle and Barry R. Weingast, 235–252. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Skroback, Andrew Evans. 1994. Even a Sacred Cow Must Live in a Green Pasture: The Proximity Principle, Free Movement of Goods, and Regulation 259/93 on Transfrontier Waste Shipments Within the EC. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 17, 1 (Winter):85–110Google Scholar

Snidal, Duncan. 1995. The Politics of Scope: Endogenous Actors, Heterogeneity, and Institutions. In Local Commons and Global Interdependence: Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains, edited by Robert O. Keohane and Elinor Ostrom, 47–70. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Snidal, Duncan. 1996. Political Economy and International Institutions. International Review of Law and Economics 16 (March):121–137CrossRef Google Scholar

Sommer, Julia. 1994. Les déchets, de l'autosuffisance et de la libre circulation des marchandises. Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union européenne no. 377 (April):246–257Google Scholar

Somsen, Hans. 1992. Case Note C-300/89, Commission v. Council (Titanium dioxide). Common Market Law Review 29:140–151Google Scholar

Somsen, Hans. 1993. Case Note C-155/91, Commission v. Council. European Environmental Law Review 2, 5 (May):121–129Google Scholar

Sprinz, Detlef, and Tapani, Vaahtoranta. 1994. The Interest-based Explanation of International Environmental Policy. International Organization 48, 1 (Winter):77–106CrossRef Google Scholar

Stacey, Jeffrey, and Rittberger, Berthold. 2003. Dynamics of Formal and Informal Institutional Change in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 10, 6 (December):858–883CrossRef Google Scholar

Steiger, Heinhard. 1977. Competence of the European Parliament for Environmental Policy. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag

Steunenberg, Bernard. 1994. Decision Making Under Different Institutional Arrangements: Legislation by the European Community. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150, 4 (December):642–669Google Scholar

Steunenberg, Bernard. 1997. Codecision and Its Reform: A Comparative Analysis of Decision Making Rules in the European Union. In Political Institutions and Public Policy: Perspectives on European Decision Making, edited by Bernard Steunenberg and Frans Van Vught, 205–229. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Steunenberg, Bernard. 1998. Constitutional Change in the European Union: Parliament's Impact on the Reform of the Codecision Procedure. Unpublished manuscript, University of Twente, 17 September

Steunenberg, Bernard, and Antoaneta Dimitrova. 1999. Interests, Legitimacy, and Constitutional Choice: The Extension of the Codecision Procedure in Amsterdam. Prepared for the workshop “Enlarging or Deepening: European Integration at the Crossroads” at the Joint Sessions of Workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research, Mannheim, Germany, 26–31 March

Steunenberg, Bernard, Dieter, Schmidtchen, and Christian, Koboldt. 1999. Strategic Power in the European Union: Evaluating the Distribution of Power in Policy Games. Journal of Theoretical Politics 11, 3 (July):339–366CrossRef Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Stone Sweet, Alec, Neil Fligstein, and Wayne Sandholtz. 2001. The Institutionalization of European Space. In The Institutionalization of Europe, edited by Alec Stone Sweet, Wayne Sandholtz, and Neil Fligstein, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Strom, Gerald S. 1990. The Logic of Lawmaking: A Spatial Theory Approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Str⊘m, Kaare. 1998. Institutions and Strategy in Parliamentary Democracy: A Review Article. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23, 1 (February):127–143CrossRef Google Scholar

Talbert, Jeffery C., Bryan, D. Jones, and Frank, R. Baumgartner. 1995. Nonlegislative Hearings and Policy Change in Congress. American Journal of Political Science 39, 2 (May):383–406CrossRef Google Scholar

Teasdale, Anthony L. 1993. The Life and Death of the Luxembourg Compromise. Journal of Common Market Studies 31, 4 (December):567–579CrossRef Google Scholar

Teitgen, Pierre-Henri, and Colette, Megret. 1981. La fumée de la cigarette dans la “zone grise” des compétences de la C. E. E. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen 17:68–81Google Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2:369–404CrossRef Google Scholar

Tomz, Michael, Gary King, and Langche Zeng. 1999. RELOGIT: Rare Events Logistic Regression, version 1.1 for Stata. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1 October. URL http://gking.harvard.edu/

Touscoz, Jean. 1973. L'action des communautés européennes en matière d'environnement. Revue trimestrielle de droit Européen 9:29–45Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 1990. Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press

Tsebelis, George. 1994. The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter. American Political Science Review 88:128–142CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 1995. Conditional Agenda-Setting and Decision-Making Inside the European Parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies 1, 1 (Spring):65–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 1996. More on the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter: Response to Moser. American Political Science Review 90:839–844CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 1997. Maastricht and the Democratic Deficit. Aussenwirtschaft 52, 1/2:38–56Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Tsebelis, George, and Geoffrey, Garrett. 1997. Agenda Setting, Vetoes and the European Union's Co-decision Procedure. Journal of Legislative Studies 3:74–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George, and Geoffrey, Garrett. 2000. Legislative Politics in the European Union. European Union Politics 1, 1:9–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George, and Geoffrey, Garrett. 2001. The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union. International Organization 55, 2 (Spring):357–390CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George, and Anastassios, Kalandrakis. 1999. The European Parliament and Environmental Legislation: The Case of Chemicals. European Journal of Political Research 36, 1 (August):119–154CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George, and Amie, Kreppel. 1998. The History of Conditional Agenda-setting in European Institutions. European Journal of Political Research 33, 1 (January):41–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George, and Jeannette Money. 1997. Bicameralism. New York: Cambridge University Press

Tsebelis, George, and Xenophon, Yataganas. 2002. Veto Players and Decision-making in the European Union After Nice: Policy Stability and Bureaucratic/Judicial Discretion. Journal of Common Market Studies 40, 2:283–307CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George, et al. 2002. Legislative Procedures in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 31:573–599Google Scholar

Usher, John A. 1985. The Scope of Community Competence – Its Recognition and Enforcement. Journal of Common Market Studies 24:121–136CrossRef Google Scholar

Usher, John A. 1988. The Gradual Widening of European Community Policy on the Basis of Articles 100 and 235 of the EEC Treaty. In Structure and Dimensions of European Community Policy, edited by Jürgen Schwarze and Henry G. Schermers. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft

Vandermeersch, Dirk. 1987. The Single European Act and the Environmental Policy of the European Economic Community. European Law Review 12:407–429Google Scholar

Varela, Diego. 1999. A Take-It-or-Leave-It Proposal with Incomplete Information: What Is Parliament's Share of the Pie Under Maastricht's Co-Decision? Presented at the 6th Biennial Conference of the European Community Studies Association, Pittsburgh, PA, 2–5 June

Varela, Diego. 2000. Legislative Powers: A Positive Theory with Evidence from the European Parliament, 1989–1999. Ph.D. Thesis, London School of Economics

Vasey, Martin. 1988. Decision-Making in the Agriculture Council and the “Luxembourg Compromise.”Common Market Law Review 25, 4 (Winter):725–732Google Scholar

Ventura, Sergio. 1967. Principes de droit agraire Communautaire. Brussels: Bruylant

Voigt, Stefan. 1999. Implicit Constitutional Change: Changing the Meaning of the Constitution Without Changing the Text of the Document. European Journal of Law and Economics 7, 3 (May):197–224CrossRef Google Scholar

Volcansek, Mary L. 1992. The European Court of Justice: Supranational Policy-Making. West European Politics 15:109–121CrossRef Google Scholar

Moltke, Konrad. 1977. The Legal Basis for Environmental Policy. Environmental Policy & Law 3:136–140CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilmowsky, Peter. 1993. Waste Disposal in the Internal Market: The State of Play After the ECJ's Ruling on the Walloon Import Ban. Common Market Law Review 30:541–570Google Scholar

Wachsmann, Anne. 1993a. Case Note C-155/91, Commission v. Council. Common Market Law Review 30, 5 (October):1051–1065Google Scholar

Wachsmann, Anne. 1993b. Le contentieux de la base juridique dans la jurisprudence de la Cour. Europe (January):1–5Google Scholar

Weatherill, Stephen. 1995. Law and Integration in the European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Weaver, R. Kent, and Bert A. Rockman. 1993. When and How Do Institutions Matter? In Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad, edited by R. Kent Weaver and Bert A. Rockman, 445–461. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution

Weber, Katja. 1997. Institutional Choice in International Politics: A Glimpse at European Union Members' Industrial Policies. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, 18–22 March, Toronto, Canada

Weingast, Barry R. 1979. A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms. American Journal of Political Science 23, 2 (May):245–262CrossRef Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry R. 1998. Political Stability and Civil War: Institutions, Commitment, and American Democracy. In Analytic Narratives, by Robert Bates et al., 148–193. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Weingast, Barry R., and William, J. Marshall. 1988. The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets. Journal of Political Economy 96:132–163CrossRef Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander. 2001. Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design. International Organization 55, 4 (Autumn):1019–1049CrossRef Google Scholar

Wessels, Wolfgang. 1991. The EC Council: The Community's Decisionmaking Center. In The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change, edited by Robert O. Keohane and Stanley Hoffmann, 133–154. Boulder, CO: Westview Press

Westlake, Martin. 1997. “Mad Cows and Englishmen” – The Institutional Consequences of the Bovine spongiform encephalopathy Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies 35, Annual Review Supplement (September):11–36Google Scholar

Wheeler, Marina, and Marc, Pallemaerts. 1992. Legal Basis for Waste Management. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 1, 2:175–176Google Scholar

Wilkinson, David. 1992. Maastricht and the Environment: The Implications for the EC's Environment Policy of the Treaty on European Union. Journal of Environmental Law 4:221–240CrossRef Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press

Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press

Wincott, Daniel. 1995. Institutional Interaction and European Integration: Towards an Everyday Critique of Liberal Intergovernmentalism. Journal of Common Market Studies 33, 4 (December):597–609CrossRef Google Scholar

Woolley, John T. 2000. Using Media-Based Data in Studies of Politics. American Journal of Political Science 44, 1 (January):156–173CrossRef Google Scholar

Wright, Elisabethann. 1998. Can the European Parliament Punish European Commission Officials – Who Takes the Blame for the Bovine spongiform encephalopathy Mess?European Food Law Review 8 (March):39–45Google Scholar