Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:34:37.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7.2 - alternative perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2018

Madeleine Gleave
Affiliation:
Advanced Implementation Specialist, Dharma Platform, USA
Todd Moss
Affiliation:
Chief Operating Officer and Senior Fellow, Center for Global Development
Bjorn Lomborg
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Get access

Summary

Summary

The invigorated focus on energy on the development agenda is a positive step reflecting what governments, business leaders, and citizens across the developing world agree: increasing access to energy is a top priority and central to solving other challenges in health, education, and job creation. The first set of MDGs acknowledged energy's role, but left access as an implicit step required to meet other targets. The draft list of new Sustainable Development Goals now includes a proposal to “ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all.”

However, although there is general agreement on the need for universal access to electricity, determining what specifically constitutes “modern access” is a more difficult task, with no clear-cut definition. Modern energy access entails less a physical connection than the availability of reliable and affordable power necessary to sustain a dignified lifestyle, one that is consistently free from depravation and intimately connected with the global community. At present, nearly all definitions provide a gross underestimate of what a growing class of the world's poor expect and demand in the way of energy services.

According to the IEA definition, a household is considered to have “modern electricity access” at a consumption minimum of 250 kWh per year (or roughly 50 kWh/person/year) in rural areas and 500 kWh per year (100 kWh/person/year) in urban areas. But these are indefensibly low thresholds. An average of 100 kWh/year equates to powering a single 60-watt light bulb for five hours each day; a typical American would use the same amount of energy in just three days.

We propose three possible alternative ways to set thresholds that would capture a more realistic level of consumption at modern levels and provide a better target:

  • A simple peer-level threshold, based on average consumption levels in middle-income countries such as Tunisia (1,300 kWh/year) or South Africa (4,600 kWh/year). This would provide targets that are closer to what is needed for a modern standard of living.

  • The World Bank's Global Tracking Framework has developed a classification of energy access over a system of five tiers. One approach could set the global goal for all citizens to have reliable, affordable, and safe energy for household use and cooking by 2030 – which is at minimum Tier 4. Countries already at Tier 4 could aim to reach Tier 5.

  • Type
    Chapter
    Information
    Prioritizing Development
    A Cost Benefit Analysis of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals
    , pp. 170
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press
    Print publication year: 2018

    Access options

    Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

    Save book to Kindle

    To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    • alternative perspective
      • By Madeleine Gleave, Advanced Implementation Specialist, Dharma Platform, USA, Todd Moss, Chief Operating Officer and Senior Fellow, Center for Global Development
    • Edited by Bjorn Lomborg, Copenhagen Business School
    • Book: Prioritizing Development
    • Online publication: 30 May 2018
    • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108233767.023
    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Dropbox

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

    • alternative perspective
      • By Madeleine Gleave, Advanced Implementation Specialist, Dharma Platform, USA, Todd Moss, Chief Operating Officer and Senior Fellow, Center for Global Development
    • Edited by Bjorn Lomborg, Copenhagen Business School
    • Book: Prioritizing Development
    • Online publication: 30 May 2018
    • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108233767.023
    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Google Drive

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

    • alternative perspective
      • By Madeleine Gleave, Advanced Implementation Specialist, Dharma Platform, USA, Todd Moss, Chief Operating Officer and Senior Fellow, Center for Global Development
    • Edited by Bjorn Lomborg, Copenhagen Business School
    • Book: Prioritizing Development
    • Online publication: 30 May 2018
    • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108233767.023
    Available formats
    ×