Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:45:54.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2018

Get access

Summary

The EC Treaty, so the European Court of Justice found in its judgment in Costa v ENEL, created its own legal order which has been integrated into the legal systems of the Member States and which their courts are bound to apply. This legal system is binding on both the Member States and their citizens. In Van Gend en Loos the Court of Justice expressly took the ground that EU law can have direct effect. Independently of the legislation of Member States it not only imposes obligations on individuals but is also intended to confer upon them rights which become part of their legal heritage. These rights arise not only where they are expressly granted by the Treaty, but also by reason of obligations which the Treaty imposes in a clearly defined way on individuals as well as upon the Member States and upon the institutions of the Community. In subsequent judgments the Court made it clear that this includes rights and obligations of a private law nature.

This volume has for its theme the interplay and influence exerted on approaches and legal concepts of private law, including property rights law, by primary EU law, particularly internal market law. The starting hypothesis is that the Court of Justice (also, the Court) has developed concepts in private law cases which are different in substance from the concepts which exist in the private law systems of the Member States. The project aims to present developments in current law of which EU lawyers and private lawyers generally are unaware. This book offers ground-breaking analyses of the main private law concepts (the person, property, contract and tort, and remedies) as they are used, created or adjusted by the Court. Each analysis results from insights obtained into the substantive meaning of the concepts deployed in the Court's case law, disconnected from national meanings of such concepts. The direction of this analysis is from the cases to the concepts, not the other way around: the cases and the facts behind the cases are the starting point. In this ways the analyses aim to avoid preconceptions based on national private law systems.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×