Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:16:54.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Pretend play, metarepresentation and theory of mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2009

Robert W. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond
Get access

Summary

In symbolic play, young children advance upon their cognitions about people, objects and actions and in this way construct increasingly sophisticated representations of the world.

(bornsteinet al., 1996, p. 2923)

[O]ur intuition is that extensive fantasy experiences help children develop an understanding of mind.

(taylor & carlson, 1997, p. 452)

Pretend play as a human characteristic

Fully developed pretend play, including role play and sociodramatic play, seems universal in all human societies and uniquely human, with only rudimentary pretence shown by some apes (Schwartzmann, 1978; Slaughter & Dombrowski, 1989; Smith, 1996). Cross-cultural variations exist in amount and type of pretence (Smilansky, 1968; Roopnarine, Johnson & Hooper, 1994), which appears dependent upon children's physical and cultural context. For example, among hunter-gatherers, children in mixed-age peer groups used sticks and pebbles to represent village huts and herding cows (Konner, 1976; Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1989), and in the Marquesas Islands of Polynesia, children made mud bananas (Martini, 1994). Such symbolic object-use comprised half of the “fantasy play” episodes of the Marquesan children; the other half involved more complex scripts and roles, such as “‘ship’ play, ‘fishing,’ ‘hunting,’ and ‘preparing feasts’” (Martini, 1994, p. 84). These episodes “follow the same fantasy scripts from one performance to the next,” and often involve some imitation of adult actions.

The ubiquitousness of pretend play in human children suggests biological processes at work (Slaughter & Dombrowski, 1989; Harris, 1994), and raises the question of its biological function.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×