Book contents
- Preparing for the Next Financial Crisis
- Preparing for the Next Financial Crisis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Non-Standard Monetary Policy and Financial Stability: Developing an Appropriate Macrofinancial Policy Mix
- 2 Financial Innovation and Financial Stability: An Introduction
- 3 Post-Crisis Changes in US Bank Prudential Regulation
- 4 Notes on the Interaction between Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy: Financial Markets and Policy through the Lens of Macroeconomics
- 5 Investment Doctrines for Banks, from Real Bills to Post-Crisis Reforms
- 6 Stress Testing in Banking: A Critical Review
- 7 Making Sense of the EU-Wide Stress Test – Comparing SRISK and the ECB/EBA Measures of Bank Vulnerability
- 8 The Role of Personality in Financial Decisions and Financial Crises
- 9 Model Apocalypto
- Index
- References
8 - The Role of Personality in Financial Decisions and Financial Crises
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2017
Book contents
- Preparing for the Next Financial Crisis
- Preparing for the Next Financial Crisis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Non-Standard Monetary Policy and Financial Stability: Developing an Appropriate Macrofinancial Policy Mix
- 2 Financial Innovation and Financial Stability: An Introduction
- 3 Post-Crisis Changes in US Bank Prudential Regulation
- 4 Notes on the Interaction between Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy: Financial Markets and Policy through the Lens of Macroeconomics
- 5 Investment Doctrines for Banks, from Real Bills to Post-Crisis Reforms
- 6 Stress Testing in Banking: A Critical Review
- 7 Making Sense of the EU-Wide Stress Test – Comparing SRISK and the ECB/EBA Measures of Bank Vulnerability
- 8 The Role of Personality in Financial Decisions and Financial Crises
- 9 Model Apocalypto
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Preparing for the Next Financial CrisisPolicies, Tools and Models, pp. 139 - 156Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Google Scholar
Barrick, M. R., and Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 44(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battigalli, P., and Dufwenberg, M. (2007). Guilt in games. The American Economic Review, 170–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettencourt, B., Talley, A., Benjamin, A. J., and Valentine, J. (2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 132(5), 751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, J. (2010). The five-factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry 21(1), 2–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P. T., and McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences 13(6), 653–665.Google Scholar
Endlich, L. (2000). Goldman Sachs: The Culture of Success. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Fang, D., and Noe, T. H. (2016). Skewing the odds: Taking risks for rank-based rewards. Working Paper. Oxford: Saïd Business School.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., and Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), 817–868.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. J., and Beaver, K. M. (2009). Natural born killers: The genetic origins of extreme violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior 14(5), 286–294.Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1990). Additive non-transitive preferences. Economics Letters 34(4), 317–321.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist 48(1), 26.Google Scholar
Hogan, J., and Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(1), 100.Google Scholar
Hurtz, G. M., and Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The big five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 85(6), 869.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. K., Rustichini, A., and MacDonald, A. W. (2009). Suspicious personality predicts behavior on a social decision-making task. Personality and Individual Differences 47(1), 30–35.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–291.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S., and Sorensen, M. (2016). Are CEOs different? Characteristics of top managers. Working Paper. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Kugler, T., Neeman, Z., and Vulkan, N. (2014). Personality traits and strategic behavior: Anxiousness and aggressiveness in entry games. Journal of Economic Psychology 42, 136–147.Google Scholar
Lauriola, M., and Levin, I. P. (2001). Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences 31(2), 215–226.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S., and Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(1), 146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, M. A., and Brown, J. D. (2006). Trait aggressiveness and situational provocation: A test of the traits as situational sensitivities (tass) model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32(8), 1100–1113.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Saklofske, D. H., Costa Jr, P. T., Deary, I. J., and Zeidner, M. (1998). Dimensional models of personality: A framework for systematic clinical assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 14(1), 36.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., and Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McInish, T. H. (1982). Individual investors and risk-taking. Journal of Economic Psychology 2(2), 125–136.Google Scholar
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., and Schmitt, N. (2007). Are we getting fooled again? coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology 60(4), 1029–1049.Google Scholar
Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., and Strauss, J. P. (1994). Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology 79(2), 272.Google Scholar
Noe, T., and Vulkan, N., (2016). Naked aggression. Working Paper. Oxford: Saïd Business School.Google Scholar
Peleg, B., and Yaari, M. E. (1973). On the existence of a consistent course of action when tastes are changing. The Review of Economic Studies 40(3), 391–401.Google Scholar
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological bulletin 135(2), 322.Google Scholar
Ray, D., and Robson, A. (2012). Status, intertemporal choice, and risk-taking. Econometrica 80(4), 1505–1531.Google Scholar
Reynaud, A., and Couture, S. (2012). Stability of risk preference measures: Results from a field experiment on French farmers. Theory and Decision 73(2), 203–221.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., and Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2(4), 313–345.Google Scholar
Rustichini, A., DeYoung, C. G., Anderson, J. C., and Burks, S. V. (2012). Toward the integration of personality theory and decision theory in the explanation of economic and health behavior. IZA Discussion Paper. Bonn: IZA Institute of Labor Economics.Google Scholar
Scheinkman, J. A., and Xiong, W. (2003). Overconfidence and speculative bubbles. Journal of Political Economy 111(6), 1183–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strotz, R. H. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. The Review of Economic Studies 23(3), 165–180.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4), 1039–1061.Google Scholar
van Witteloostuijn, A., and Muehlfeld, K. (2007). Trader personality and trading performance. Discussion Paper Series # nr: 08-28. Utrecht: Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by