Staking claim to history

In building a claim to the space of the meadow, activists often called on a history of the site that situated it as a pristine space of leisure. It is important for the way the campaigns have portrayed this land that it was never ‘built’ on before, although the surface of the pitches was artificial and it at one time had two changing room buildings on the site. Only one of those now remains, crumbling on the Clouston Street side of the meadow. The lack of historical building on the land is written on laminated posters on the site itself, as well as on the website. In making claims to ‘history’ and the idea that this is ‘established’, Polly and Alasdair, as well as the posters around the site, make knowledge claims about the site and position it as a local community good: as playing fields, as for ‘leisure use’. In invoking history they are also making claims to precedent and legitimacy, to shift what could be seen as an argument for a change of use, to an argument for continuity of use.

This historical perspective, however, was part of a framing of the site that sat awkwardly against earlier periods of activism. Sean, who was active from the mid-1990s until around 2007, took some umbrage with this pristine vision, noting to me in 2016: “They’re talking as if this site has never been developed, never been put forward for any kind of community scheme whatsoever. … But that's not true.”