Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- THE CASE FOR POSTMODERNISM AS SOCIAL THEORY
- CONTESTING FOUNDATIONS: THE CRISIS OF REPRESENTATION
- 6 The end of sociological theory
- 7 The theoretical subject(s) of This Bridge Called My Back and Anglo-American feminism
- 8 Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of ‘postmodernism’
- 9 Subjectivity in social analysis
- HUMAN STUDIES AS RHETORIC, NARRATIVE, AND CRITIQUE
- POSTMODERN SOCIAL ANALYSIS: EMPIRICAL ILLUSTRATIONS
7 - The theoretical subject(s) of This Bridge Called My Back and Anglo-American feminism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- THE CASE FOR POSTMODERNISM AS SOCIAL THEORY
- CONTESTING FOUNDATIONS: THE CRISIS OF REPRESENTATION
- 6 The end of sociological theory
- 7 The theoretical subject(s) of This Bridge Called My Back and Anglo-American feminism
- 8 Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of ‘postmodernism’
- 9 Subjectivity in social analysis
- HUMAN STUDIES AS RHETORIC, NARRATIVE, AND CRITIQUE
- POSTMODERN SOCIAL ANALYSIS: EMPIRICAL ILLUSTRATIONS
Summary
This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color, edited by Chicana writers Cherríe Moraga and Gloria Anzaldúa, was intended as a collection of essays, poems, tales and testimonials that would give voice to the contradictory experiences of “women of color.” In fact, the editors state:
We are the colored in a white feminist movement.
We are the feminists among the people of our culture.
We are often the lesbians among the straight.
By giving voice to such experiences, each according to her style, the editors and contributors believed they were developing a theory of subjectivity and culture that would demonstrate the considerable differences between them and Anglo-American women, as well as between them and Anglo-European men and men of their own culture. As speaking subjects of a new discursive formation, many of Bridge's writers were aware of the displacement of their subjectivity across a multiplicity of discourses: feminist/lesbian, nationalist, racial, socioeconomic, historical, etc. The peculiarity of their displacement implies a multiplicity of positions from which they are driven to grasp or understand themselves and their relations with the real, in the Althusserian sense of the word. Bridge writers, in part, were aware that these positions are often incompatible or contradictory, and others did not have access to the maze of discourses competing for their body and voice.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Postmodern TurnNew Perspectives on Social Theory, pp. 140 - 152Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1994
- 10
- Cited by