Abitbol, M. (2014) “D’une guerre à l‘autre [From One War to Another]” in Abitbol, M., ed., Histoire du Maroc [History of Maroc]. Paris: Perrin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abourabi, Y. (2019) “The Kingdom of Morocco: Introductory Note.” Oxford Constitutions of the World [OCW].Google Scholar

Abu ‘Awad, ‘A. (2011) Athar al-Ijtihād al-Fiqhī fī Ta‘dīl Mudawwanat al-Usra al-Maghribiyya [The Effect of Doctrinal Interpretation on the Amendment of the Moroccan Family Code]. Rabat: al-Umniya Publisher.Google Scholar

Aït El-Hajj, M. (2005–6) Introductory Lectures on the Study of Legal Sciences: General Theory of Law, General Theory of Rights (in Arabic). Tangiers: s.e.Google Scholar

Al-Hakim, T. (1989 [1937]) Maze of Justice: Diary of a Country Prosecutor. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Al-Tahtawi, R. (1834) Takhlîs al-Ibrîz fî Talkhîs Bârîz. Bûlâq: al-Maktaba al-Amîriyya [An Imam in Paris: Al-Tahtawi’s Visit to France (1826–31)]. Trans. Daniel Newman (London: Saqi, 2011)].Google Scholar

AMDC (2017) Association Marocaine de Droit Constitutionnel, Journée d’Etudes, 2/3 Mars 2017, Chef d’Etat et Chef de gouvernement: analyse constitutionnelle et politique d’une dyarchie. Appel à contributions: Argumentaire [Moroccan Association of Constitutional Law, Study Day, 2/3 March 2017, Head of State and Head of Government: Constitutional and Political Analysis of a Dyarchy. Call for Papers: Rationale].Google Scholar

Anderson, B. (1984) Imagined Community: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. N. D. (1954) Islamic Law in Africa. London: H.M.S.O. for the Colonial Office.Google Scholar

Aquin, T. d’ (1984–6 [1266–73]) Somme Théologique. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar

Armanios, F. and Ergene, B. (2018) Halal Food: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Atias, C. (1999) Philosophie du droit [Philosophy of Law]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Austin, J. (1954 [1832]) The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (ed. Hart, H. L. A. ). London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (2018 [1962]) How to Do Things with Words. Eastford: Martino Fine Books.Google Scholar

Badar, M. E. and Higgins, N. (2017) “Discussion Interrupted: The Destruction and Protection of Cultural Property under International Law and Islamic Law – The Case of Prosecutor v. Al Mahdi.” International Criminal Law Review 17(3): 486–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, J. E. (2017) Islamic Law and Empire in Ottoman Cairo. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Battie, W. (1758) A Treatise on Madness. London: J. Whiston and B. White.Google Scholar

Baxi, U. (2003) “The Colonialist Heritage” in Legrand, P. and Munday, R., eds., Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Beaud, O. (2003) “Constitution et droit constitutionnel [Constitution and Constitutional Law]” in Alland, D. and Rials, S., eds., Dictionnaire de la culture juridique [Dictionary of Legal Culture]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Beaud, O. (2009) “L’histoire du concept de constitution en France. De la constitution politique à la constitution comme statut juridique de l’Etat [The History of the Concept of Constitution in France: From Political Constitution to Constitution as the Legal Status of the State].” Jus Politicum 3 [http://juspoliticum.com/article/L-histoire-du-concept-de-constitution-en-France-De-la-constitution-politique-a-la-constitution-comme-statut-juridique-de-l-Etat-140.html].Google Scholar

Bechor, G. (2007) The Sanhuri Code, and the Emergence of Modern Arab Civil Law (1932 to 1949). Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bedner, A. and van Huis, S. (2010) “Plurality of Marriage Law and Marriage Registration for Muslims in Indonesia: A Plea for Pragmatism.” Utrecht Law Review 6(2): 175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben Achour, Y. (1980) L’Etat nouveau et la philosophie politique et juridique occidentale [The New State and Western Political and Legal Philosophy].Tunis: Publication du Centre d’Etudes, de Recherche et de Publication de la Faculté de Droit et de Sciences Politiques et Economiques de Tunis.Google Scholar

Ben Ahmed, M. R. (1987) “Rapport introductive [Introductory Report]” in Les expériences constitutionnelles maghrébines [Maghreb Constitutional Experiences]. Tunis: Publication du Centre d’Etudes, de Recherche et de Publication de la Faculté de Droit et de Sciences Politiques et Economiques de Tunis.Google Scholar

Bendourou, O. (1997) “Conseils constitutionnels et Etat de droit au Maghreb [Constitutional Councils and Rule of Law in the Maghreb]” in Mahiou, A., ed., L’Etat de droit dans le monde arabe [The Rule of Law in the Arab World]. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar

Bennani-Chraïbi, M., Catusse, M., and Santucci, J. C., eds. (2004) Scènes et coulisses de l’élection au Maroc. Les Législatives 2002 [Scenes and Behind the Scenes of the Election in Morocco. Legislative 2002]. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar

Bennett, M. R. and Hacker, P. M. S. (2003) The Philosophical Foundations of Neurosciences. London: Wiley and Blackwell.Google Scholar

Benson, D. and Hughes, J. (1991) “Method: Evidence and Inference for Ethnomethodology” in Button, G., ed., Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (1838–43) The Works of Jeremy Bentham. London: Bowring Ed.Google Scholar

Berger, M. and Sonneveld, N. (2010) “Sharia and National law in Egypt” in Otto, J. M., ed., Sharia Incorporated. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Bernard-Maugiron, N. (2004) Le politique à l’épreuve du judiciaire: La justice constitutionnelle en Egypte [Politics Put to the Test of the Judiciary: Constitutional Justice in Egypt]. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar

Bernard-Maugiron, N. (2008) “Introduction” in Bernard-Maugiron, N., ed., Judges and Political Reform in Egypt. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar

Berque, J. (2001 [1944]) Essai sur la méthode juridique maghrébine in Opera Minora – I. Anthropologie juridique du Maghreb [Essay on the Maghreb Legal Method in Opera Minora - I. Legal Anthropology of the Maghreb]. Paris: Bouchène.Google Scholar

Binduru, ‘ U., al-Musaddiq, R., and Madani, M., eds. (2014) Al-dustûr al-maghribî al-jadîd ‘alâ mihakk al-mumârasa [The New Moroccan Constitution to the Test of Practice]. Rabat: La Croisée des chemins.Google Scholar

Binyahya, M., ed. (2011) Al-dustûr al-jadîd li’l-mamlaka al-maghribiyya – 2011 [The New Constitution of the Kingdom of Morocco – 2011]. Rabat: REMALD.Google Scholar

Blackstone, W. (1765) Commentaries on the Laws of England [https://lonang.com/library/reference/blackstone-commentaries-law-england/].Google Scholar

Bobbio, N. (2015) “Etre et devoir-être dans la science du droit [To Be and to Be in the Science of Law]” in Béal, C., ed., Philosophie du droit. Norme, validité et interpretation [Philosophy of Law: Standard, Validity and Interpretation]. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Bolingbroke, H. St. J., Lord Viscount (1771) A Dissertation upon Parties in Several Letters to Caleb d’Anvers, Esq., 9th ed. London: T. Davies.Google Scholar

Bonneff, M., Cayrac-Blanchard, F., and Labrousse, P. (1980) Pantjasila: Trente années de débats politiques en Indonésie [Pantjasila: Thirty Years of Political Debate in Indonesia]. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar

Bontems, C. (2015) “Quelques réflexions sur le droit colonial algérien [Some Thoughts on Algerian Colonial Law]” in Bras, J. P., ed., Faire l’histoire du droit colonial. Cinquante ans après l’indépendance de l’Algérie [Making the History of Colonial Law: Fifty Years after the Independence of Algeria]. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar

Botiveau, B. (1989) “L’adaptation d’un modèle français d’enseignement du droit au Proche-Orient [The Adaptation of a French Model of Law Teaching in the Middle East]” in Flory, M. and Henry, J. R., eds., L’enseignement du droit musulman [The Teaching of Muslim Law]. Marseille: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1986) “La force du droit [The Force of Law].” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales [Social Science Research Proceedings] 64: 3–6.Google Scholar

Bousquet, G. H. (1952) “Pour l’étude des droits berbères. A propos de G. Marcy ‘Le Droit coutumier Zemmoûr’, suivi d’une bibliographie d’ensemble de la question [For the Study of Berber Rights: About G. Marcy ‘Customary Law Zemmoûr’, Followed by a Bibliography of the Whole Issue].” Hespéris 39: 501–13.Google Scholar

Brand, P. (2012) “The English Medieval Common Law (to c.1307) as a System of National Institutions and Legal Rules: Creation and Functioning” in Dresch, P. and Skoda, A., eds., Legalism: Anthropology and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bras, J. P., ed. (2015a) Faire l’histoire du droit colonial. Cinquante ans après l’indépendance de l’Algérie [Making the History of Colonial Law: Fifty Years after the Independence of Algeria]. Paris: Karthala.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bras, J. P. (2015b) “Introduction” in Bras, J. P., ed. Faire l’histoire du droit colonial. Cinquante ans après l’indépendance de l’Algérie [Making the History of Colonial Law: Fifty Years after the Independence of Algeria]. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar

Bras, J. P. (2015c) “La charrue avant les boeufs: sur l’intranquillité du droit foncier et de sa doctrine en Afrique du Nord [The Cart before the Horse: On the Uneasiness of Land Law and Its Doctrine in North Africa]” in Bras, J. P., ed. Faire l’histoire du droit colonial. Cinquante ans après l’indépendance de l’Algérie [Making the History of Colonial Law: Fifty Years after the Independence of Algeria]. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar

Brown, N. (1997a) “Shari‘a and State in the Modern Muslim Middle East’. International Journal of Middle East Studies 29(3): 359–376.Google Scholar

Brown, N. (1997b) The Rule of Law in the Arab World. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, N. (2002) Constitutions in a Nonconstitutional World: Arabic Basic Laws and the Prospects for Accountable Government. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Buskens, L. (2010) “Sharia and National Law in Morocco” in Otto, J. M., ed., Sharia Incorporated: A Comparative Overview of the Legal Systems of Twelve Muslim Countries in Past and Present. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar

Buskens, L. (2014) “Sharia and the Colonial State” in Bearman, P. and Peters, R., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to Islamic Law. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Buskens, L. (2017) “From Trash to Treasure: Ethnographic Notes on Collecting Legal Documents in Morocco” in Van Berkel, M., Buskens, L., and Sijpesteijn, P., eds., Legal Documents as Sources for the History of Muslim Societies. Studies in Honour of Rudolph Peters. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Buskens, L. (in press) “Berber Customs as Heritage: The Discovery and Rediscovery of Customary Law in Morocco.”Google Scholar

Buskens, L. and Dupret, B. (2015) “The Invention of Islamic Law: A History of Western Studies of Islamic Normativity and Their Spread in the Orient” in Pouillon, F. and Vatin, J. C., eds., After Orientalism: Critical Perspectives on Western Agency and Eastern Re-appropriations. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (2017) L’Empire des marchés. Comprendre leur fonctionnement pour pouvoir les changer [The Empire of Markets: Understand How They Work to Be Able to Change Them]. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Camau, M. (1971) “L’évolution du droit constitutionnel en Tunisie depuis 1955 [The Evolution of Constitutional Law in Tunisia since 1955].” Jahrbuch Des Offentlichen Recht Der Gegenwart [Yearbook of Public Law of the Present] 20: 309–74.Google Scholar

Camau, M. (1973) “L’évolution du droit constitutionnel au Maroc depuis l’indépendance (1955–1971) [The Evolution of Constitutional Law in Morocco since Independence (1955–1971)].” Jahrbuch Des Offentlichen Recht Der Gegenwart [Yearbook of Public Law of the Present] 21: 383–529.Google Scholar

Camau, M. (1974) “L’Evolution du droit constitutionnel en Algérie depuis l’indépendance (1962–1972) [The Evolution of Constitutional Law in Algeria since Independence (1962–1972)].” Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart [Yearbook of Public Law of the Present] 23: 239–334.Google Scholar

Camau, M. (1976) “De quelques aspects juridiques de la dépendance. Le droit constitutionnel des Etats maghrébins postcoloniaux [Some Legal Aspects of Dependency: The Constitutional Law of Postcolonial Maghreb States]” in Ruf, W. K., Vatin, J. C., and Camau, M., eds., Rapports de dépendance au Maghreb [Dependency Relations in the Maghreb]. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar

Camau, M. (1978) Pouvoir et institutions au Maghreb [Power and Institutions in the Maghreb]. Tunis: Cérès Productions.Google Scholar

Cardinal, M. (2005) “Islamic Legal Theory Curriculum: Are the Classics Taught Today?” Islamic Law and Society 12(2): 224–72.Google Scholar

Cerutti, S. (2008) “Histoire pragmatique, ou de la rencontre entre histoire sociale et histoire Culturelle [Pragmatic History, or the Meeting between Social History and Cultural History].” Tracés. Revue de Sciences humaines [Plots. Journal of Human Sciences] 15: 147–68.Google Scholar

Champeil-Desplats, V. and Troper, M. (2005) “Proposition pour une théorie des contraintes juridiques [Proposal for a Theory of Legal Constraints]” in Champeil-Desplats, V., Grzegorczyk, Ch, and Troper, M., eds., Théorie des contraintes juridiques [Theory of Legal Constraints]. Brussels and Paris: Bruylant/LGDJ.Google Scholar

Chiffoleau, J. (1990). “Dire l’indicible. Remarques sur la catégorie du nefandum du XIIe au XVe siècle.” Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 45(2): 289–324.Google Scholar

Cicourel, A. (1968) The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Clam, J. (1995) “Phénoménologie et droit chez Niklas Luhmann. De la déphénoménologisation de la sociologie à la dépolémisation du droit [Phenomenology and Law at Niklas Luhmann: From the Dephenomenologization of Sociology to the Depolemization of Law].” Archives de philosophie du droit [Philosophy of Law Archives] 39: 335–77.Google Scholar

Clarke, M. (2015) “Legalism and the Care of the Self: Sharīʻa Discourse in Contemporary Lebanon” in Dresch, P. and Scheele, J., eds., Legalism: Rules and Categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Colemans, J. (2018) “La grammaire du raisonnable. Ethnographie des pratiques interprétatives au Conseil d’Etat belge [The Grammar of the Reasonable: Ethnography of Interpretative Practices at the Belgian Council of State]” in Colemans, J. and Dupret, B., eds., Ethnographies du raisonnement juridique [Ethnographies of Legal Reasoning]. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. (2005 [1946]) The Idea of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cometti, J. P. (2011) Qu’est-ce qu’une règle? [What Is a Rule?] Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Commission for the Reform of the Criminal Code (2009 [1939]) “Rapport général sur la réforme pénale [General Report on Penal Reform]” in Code penal [Penal Code]. Beirut: Antoine Edition.Google Scholar

Constable, M. (2014) Our Word Is Our Bond: How Legal Speech Acts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R. (2010) “Review of Ubiquitous Law: Legal Theory and the Space of Legal Pluralism by E. Melissaris.” Law and Politics Book Review 19(10): 774–9.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R. (2014) “A Concept of Law for Global Legal Pluralism?” in Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L., eds., Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Coulon, A. (1994) “Harold Garfinkel” in van Meter, K., ed., La Sociologie. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar

Coulson, N. J. (1959) “Muslim Custom and Case-Law.” Die Welt des Islams [The World of Islam] 6(1/2): 13–24.Google Scholar

Coulson, N. J. (1964) A History of Islamic Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Croce, M. (2014) “Is Law a Special Domain? On the Boundary between the Legal and the Social” in Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L., eds., Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Crottet, B. (2012) “Une tentative de reformulation de la théorie des contraintes [An Attempt to Reformulate the Theory of Constraints].” Jus Politicum 7 [http://juspoliticum.com/article/Une-tentative-de-reformulation-de-la-theorie-des-contraintes-451.html].Google Scholar

Cuno, K. (2015) Modernizing Marriage: Family, Ideology, and Law in Nineteenth- and Early Twentieth-Century Egypt. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (2001) The Emergence of Sexuality: Historical Epistemology and the Formation of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, D. (2015) “Rules, Culture, and Imagination in Sanskrit Jurisprudence” in Dresch, P. and Scheele, J., eds., Legalism: Rules and Categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, D. R. (2012) “Centres of Law: Duties, Rights, and Jurisdictional Pluralism in Medieval India” in Dresch, P. and Skoda, H., eds., Legalism: Anthropology and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De Béchillon, D. (1997) Qu’est-ce qu’une règle de droit? [What Is a Rule of Law?] Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

De Galembert, C. (2008) “Présentation du numéro. Le voile en procès [Presentation of the Special Issue: The Veil on Trial].” Droit et Société [Law and Society] 68: 11–31.Google Scholar

De Josselin de Jong, J. P. B. (1994) “Customary Law: A Confusing Fiction” in Dundes Renteln, A. and Dundes, A., eds., Folk Law: Essays in the Theory and Practice of Lex Non Scripta. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

De Lolme, J.-L. (1775) The Constitution of England: Or, An Account of the English Government; in which It Is Compared, Both with the Republican Form of Government, and Occasionally with the Other Monarchies in Europe. London: G. Kearsley, OCLC 265591647.Google Scholar

Desgenettes, R. N. Dufriche, baron) (1809–28) La Description de l’Egypte ou Recueil des observations et des recherches qui ont été faites en Egypte pendant l’expédition de l’armée française [The Description of Egypt or Collection of Observations and Research that Were Made in Egypt during the Expedition of the French Army], 23 vols., Paris: Librairie impériale.Google Scholar

D’hondt, S. (2019) “Humanity and Its Beneficiaries: Footing and Stance-Taking in an International Criminal Trial.” Signs and Society 7(3): 427–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimyati (al-), S. B. (n.d.) I‘ânat al-Tâlibīn [An Aid to the Two Students], 4 vols., Cairo: Dâr Iḥyâ’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyya.Google Scholar

Diouf, K. N. (1965) “Introduction sur le projet de loi n°11–65 portant code penal [Introduction to Draft Law n°11–65 on the Penal Code].” Journal Officiel de la République du Sénégal, Débats Parlementaires de l’Assemblée Nationale.Google Scholar

Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L., eds. (2014) Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Dresch, P. (2012a) “Aspects of Non-state Law: Early Yemen and Perpetual Peace” in Dresch, P. and Skoda, H., eds., Legalism: Anthropology and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dresch, P. (2012b) “Legalism, Anthropology, and History: A View from Part of Anthropology” in Dresch, P. and Skoda, H., eds., Legalism: Anthropology and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dresch, P. and Scheele, J., eds. (2015) Legalism: Rules and Categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dresch, P. and Skoda, H., eds. (2012) Legalism: Anthropology and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Drury, M. O. (1973) The Danger of Words. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Dundes Renteln, A. and Dundes, A., eds. (1994) Folk Law: Essays in the Theory and Practice of Lex Non Scripta. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (1995) “Autorité et consultation en Islam. Présentation et traduction annotée des commentaires de Fakhr al-Dîn al-Râzî, Rashîd Ridâ et Sayyid Qutb sur Cor. III, 104 et 159 [Authority and Consultation in Islam: Presentation and Annotated Translation of Comments by Fakhr al-Dîn al-Râzî, Rashîd Ridâ and Sayyid Qutb on Cor. III, 104 and 159].” Annales islamologiques [Islamic Annals] 29: 233–81.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (1997) “A propos de la constitutionnalité de la sharî‘a. Présentation et traduction de l’arrêt du 26 mars 1994 (14 Shawwâl 1414) de la Haute cour constitutionnelle (al-mahkama al-dustûriyya al-‘ulyâ) égyptienne [About the Constitutionality of the Sharî‘a: Presentation and Translation of the Judgment of March 26, 1994 (14 Shawwâl 1414) of the Egyptian High Constitutional Court (al-mahkama al-dustûriyya al-‘ulyâ).” Islamic Law and Society 4(1): 91–113.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (1999) “L’historicité de la norme: du positivisme de l’islamologie juridique à l’anthropologie de la norme islamique [The Historicity of the Standard Norms: From the Positivism of Legal Islamology to the Anthropology of Islamic Standard Norms].” Annales HSS 54(1): 169–96.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (2000) Au nom de quel droit. Répertoires juridiques et référence religieuse dans la société égyptienne musulmane contemporaine [In the Name of What Law: Legal Repertoires and Religious Reference in Contemporary Egyptian Muslim Society]. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (2003) “A Liberal Interpretation of a Socialist Constitution: The Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court and Privatization of the Public Sector” in Kienle, E., ed., Politics from Above, Politics from Below: The Middle East in the Age of Economic Reform. London: Saqi.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (2005) “Le corps mis au langage du droit. Comment conférer à la nature une pertinence juridique” [The Body Put in the Language of the Law] Droit et Société 61: 627–53.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (2007a) “Legal Pluralism, Plurality of Laws, and Legal Practices: Theories, Critiques, and Praxiological Re-specification.” European Journal of Legal Studies 1(1): 1–26.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (2007b) “What Is Islamic Law? A Praxiological Answer and an Egyptian Case Study.” Theory, Culture and Society 24:2: 79–100.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (2011) Adjudication in Action: An Ethnomethodology of Law, Morality and Justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (2014) “The Concept of Law: A Wittgensteinian Approach with Some Ethnomethodological Specifications” in Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L., eds., Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (2016a) “Réflexions sur le concept de droit à partir de quelques cas limites [Reflections on the Concept of Law Based on Some Borderline Cases].” Droit et Société [Law and Society] 94: 645–62.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (2016b) “The Relationship between Constitutions, Politics, and Islam: A Comparative Analysis of the Maghreb Countries” in Grote, R. and Röder, T. J., eds., Constitutionalism, Human Rights and Islam after the Arab Spring. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (2017) “Le fondement du fondamentalisme : remarques sur la référence radicale à la charia [The Foundation of Fundamentalism: Notes on the Radical Reference to Sharia].” Esprit 3: 15–18.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. and Bernard-Maugiron, N. (2002) “Introduction: A General Presentation of Law and Judicial Bodies” in Bernard-Maugiron, N. and Dupret, B. (eds) Egypt and Its Laws. London, The Hague and New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. and Ferrié, J. N. (1997) “Participer au pouvoir, c’est imposer la norme: sur l’affaire Abu Zayd (Egypte, 1992–1996) [To Participate in Power Is to Impose the Norm: On the Abu Zayd Affair (Egypt, 1992–1996).” Revue Française de Science Politique [French Journal of Political Science] 47(6): 762–75.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. and Ferrié, J. N. (2008) Délibérer sous la coupole: L’activité parlementaire dans les régimes autoritaires [Deliberating under the Dome: Parliamentary Activity in Authoritarian Regimes]. Beyrouth: Presses de l’IFPO.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. and Ferrié, J. N. (2010) “Données, contexte et savoir d’arrière-plan: audience, correction procédurale et pertinence législative dans un débat parlementaire syrien [Data, Context and Background Knowledge: Hearing, Procedural Correctness and Legislative Relevance in a Syrian Parliamentary Debate]” in Olszewska, B. et al., eds., Les Données de l’enquête [Survey Data]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. and Ferrié, J. N. (2015) “The Practical Grammar of Law and Its Relation to Time” in Dupret, B., Lynch, M., and Berard, T., eds., Law at Work: Studies in Legal Ethnomethods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. and Gutron, C. (2016) “Islamic Positivism and Scientific Truth: Qur’an and Archeology in a Creationist Documentary Film.” Human Studies 39(4): 621–43.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. and Gutron, C. (2020) “Narratives of Islam and Heritage on the Internet: The Concept of Heritage and the Grammar of Fundamentalism.” Memory Studies, first published June 8, https://journals.sagepub.com/eprint/N7YAGZTGKQRHIVGAIXED/full.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. and Quéré, L. (2014) “Error, Aberration, and Abnormality: Mental Disturbance as a Shift in Frameworks of Relevance.” Human Studies 38(2): 309–30.Google Scholar

Dupret, B., Bouhya, A., Lindbekk, M., Yakin, A.U. (2019) “Filling Gaps in Legislation: The Use of Fiqh by Contemporary Courts in Morocco, Egypt, and Indonesia.” Islamic Law and Society 26(4): 405–36.Google Scholar

Dupret, B., Colemans, J., and Travers, M., eds. (2020) Legal Rules in Practice: An Exploration into Law’s Life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dupret, B., Lynch, M., and Berard, T., eds. (2015) Law at Work: Studies in Legal Ethnomethods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Duve, T. (2007) “Global Legal History – A Methodological Approach.” Max Planck Institute for European Legal History Research Paper Series 2016–04.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

ECHR (2001) “Case of Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey” European Court of Human Rights [https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001–60936%22]}].Google Scholar

ECHR (2018a) “Zehra Foundation and Others v. Turkey.” European Court of Human Rights [www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=2ahUKEwiE9Lr20ZfnAhVBahQKHRhUD8IQFjABegQIBBAB&url=https%3A%2 F%2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int%2Fapp%2Fconversion%2Fdocx%2Fpdf%3Flibrary%3DECHR%26id%3D001-184491%26filename%3DCEDH.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2spwdfBRehdXhZYbTn5Z2 R].Google Scholar

ECHR (2018b) “Molla Sali vs Greece.” European Court of Human Rights [https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001–188985%22]}].Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000) “Multiple Modernities.” Daedalus 129: 1–29.Google Scholar

El-Alami, D. (2001) “Remedy or Device? The System of Khul` and the Effects of Its Incorporation into Egyptian Personal Status Law.” Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law 6: 134–9.Google Scholar

Elster, J., Offe, C., and Preuss, U. K., eds. (1998) Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emon, A. (2018) “Epilogue” in Nassery, I., Ahmed, R., and Tatari, M., eds., The Objectives of Islamic Law: The Promises and Challenges of the Maqasid al-Shari‘a. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Fahmy, K. (1997) All the Pasha’s Men: Mehmed Ali, His Army and the Making of Modern Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fahmy, K. (2018) In Quest of Justice: Islamic Law and Forensic Medicine in Modern Egypt. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Fantappiè, C. (2011) “Professio status contractus.” Lecture at Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, January 26.Google Scholar

Ferrié, J. N. (2000) “Maroc: la mise en place de l’alternance [Morocco: The Establishment of Work-Study].” Annuaire de l’Afrique du Nord 1998 [North Africa Yearbook 1998]. Paris: CNRS-Editions.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. (2016) “Manufacturing Halal in Malaysia.” Contemporary Islam 10(1): 35–52.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1969) L’Archéologie du savoir [The Archeology of Knowledge]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1975) Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison [Discipline and Punish: Birth of the Prison]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1994) Dits et écrits, 1954–1988, Tome III: 1976–1979 [Sayings and Writings, 1954–1988, Volume III: 1976–1979]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Frank, J. (2017 [1930]) Law and the Modern Mind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Franklin, S. (2015) “A Polyphony of Rules and Categories: The Case of Early Rus” in Dresch, P. and Scheele, J., eds., Legalism: Rules and Categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Frydman, B. (2014) “Prendre les standards et les indicateurs au sérieux [Taking Standards and Indicators Seriously]” in Frydman, B., ed., Gouverner par les standards et les indicateurs. De Hume aux rankings [Governing by Standards and Indicators: From Hume to Rankings] Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar

Fuller, J. (1958) “Positivism and Fidelity to Law.” Harvard Law Review 71: 644–8.Google Scholar

Gardner, J. (2013) “Why Law Might Emerge: Hart’s Problematic Fable” in Duarte d’Almeida, L., Edwards, J. and Dolcetti, A. (eds.) Reading Hart’s The Concept of Law. London: Hart.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1974) “On the Origins of the Term ‘Ethnomethodology’” in Turner, R., ed., Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H., ed. (1986) Ethnomethodological Studies of Work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (2002) Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Gauchet, M. and Swain, G. (1980) La Pratique de l’esprit humain. L’institution asilaire et la révolution démocratique [The Practice of the Human Mind: The Asylum Institution and the Democratic Revolution]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gemei, H. (1997) Introduction to Law: Theory of Law, Theory of Right. Cairo: Cairo University.Google Scholar

Ghaly, M. (2015) “Biomedical Scientists as Co-Muftis: Their Contribution to Contemporary Islamic Bioethics.” Die Welt des Islams [The World of Islam] 55(3–4): 286–311.Google Scholar

Ghazzal, Z. (2015) The Crime of Writing: Narratives and Shared Meanings in Criminal Cases in Baathist Syria. Beirut: Presses de l’Ifpo.Google Scholar

Ghmija, ‘A. M. (2000) Mawqif al-Majlis al-A‘lâ min Thunâ’iyyat al-Qânûn wa’l-Fiqh fî Masâ’il al-Aḥwâl al-Shakhṣiyya [The Position of the Supreme Council on the Duality of Law and Doctrine in Issues of Personal Status]. Rabaṭ: n.p.Google Scholar

Ginzburg, C. (1980) The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth Century. Baltimore: Miller.Google Scholar

Ginzburg, C. (1997) Le juge et l’historien. Considérations en marge du procès Sofri [The Judge and the Historian: Remarks on the Sidelines of the Sofri Case]. Paris: Verdier.Google Scholar

Gluckman, M. (1955) The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Goldberg, I. (1998) “Mark S.W. Hoyle, Mixed Courts of Egypt.” Egypte Monde Arabe 34: 67–80 [https://journals.openedition.org/ema/1564].Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1994) Hen’s Teeth and Horse’s Toes. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Goyard-Fabre, S. (1975) Le droit et la loi dans la philosophie de Thomas Hobbes [Natural Law and Civil Law in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes]. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J. (1986) “What Is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism 24: 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimm, D. (2016) Constitutionalism: Past, Present, Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Guinchard, S. (1995) Lexique des termes juridiques [Lexicon of Legal Terms]. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. (1977) “Introduction” in Hacker, P. M. S. and Raz, J., eds., Law, Morality, and Society: Essays in Honour of H. L. A. Hart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1983) Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1995) “The Looping Effects of Human Kinds” in Sperber, D. et al., eds., Causal Cognition: A Multi-disciplinary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1999) The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (2002) Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (1962) “Jeux de langage et philosophie [Language Games and Philosophy].” Revue de métaphysique et de morale [Journal of Metaphysics and Morals] 67(3): 330–43.Google Scholar

Hag Ali, O. (1994) “The Conversion of Customary Law to Written Law” in Dundes Renteln, A. and Dundes, A., eds., Folk Law: Essays in the Theory and Practice of Lex Non Scripta.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Hallaq, W. (2004) “Can the Shari‘a Be Restored?” in Yazbeck Haddad, Y. and Freyer Stowasser, B., eds., Islamic Law and the Challenges of Modernity. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar

Hallaq, W. (2013) The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity’s Moral Predicament. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Halpérin, J. L. (2014) Five Legal Revolutions since the 17th Century: An Analysis of a Global Legal History. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Halpérin, J. L. (2017) Introduction au droit en 10 thèmes [Introduction to Law in 10 Themes]. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar

Harootunian, H. (2004) “Ghostly Comparisons” in Lamarre, T. and Nae-hui, K., eds., Impacts of Modernities. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1982) Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1983) Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. and Honoré, T. (1985) Causation in the Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hasso, F. (2010) Consuming Desires: Family Crisis and the State in the Middle East. California: Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, K. F. (1960) The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haythami (al-) Shihab al-Din Ahmad b. Hajar (n.d.) Tuhfat al-Muhtâj bi al-Sharh al-Minhaj [A Masterpiece of the Needy to Explain the Method], 10 vols. Cairo: Matba‘at Mustafâ Muhammad.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. H. (1989 [1817]) Encyclopédie des sciences philosophiques. III. Philosophie de l’esprit [Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. III. Philosophy of Mind]. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Heinich, N. (2017) Des valeurs. Une approche sociologique [Values: A Sociological Approach]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Hennette Vauchez, S. and Valentin, V. (2014) L’affaire Baby Loup ou la Nouvelle Laïcité [The Baby Loup Affair or New Secularism]. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Henry, J. R. (2015) “Le passage du droit colonial à son histoire dans l’Algérie de l’indépendance [The Transition from Colonial Law to Its History in Independence Algeria]” in Bras, J. P., ed., Faire l’histoire du droit colonial. Cinquante ans après l’indépendance de l’Algérie [Making the History of Colonial Law: Fifty Years after the Independence of Algeria]. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hill, E. (1987) Al-Sanhuri and Islamic Law. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. (1997 [1681]) A Dialogue between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. (1962) The Age of Revolution: Europe 1789–1848. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar

Hoffman, K. (2010) “Berber Law by French Means: Customary Courts in the Moroccan Hinterlands, 1930–1956.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 52(4): 851–80.Google Scholar

Holmes, S. (1988) “Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy” in Elster, J. and Slagstad, R., eds., Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hoyle, M. S. W. (1986) “The Mixed Courts of Egypt 1875–1885.” Arab Law Quarterly 1(4): 436–451.Google Scholar

Hoyle, M. S. W. (1991) Mixed Courts of Egypt. London: Graham & Trotman [www.hssma.org/admin_files/AMDC%203–04.03.2017%20Oujda%20.pdf].Google Scholar

Humfress, C. (2015) “Telling Stories about (Roman) Law: Rules and Concepts in Legal Discourse” in Dresch, P. and Scheele, J., eds., Legalism: Rules and Categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Husa, J. (2014) “The Truth Is Out There? Legal Pluralism and the Language-Game” in Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L., eds., Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Husni, M. N. (1989) Sharh qânûn al-`uqûbât, 1. al-qânûn al-`âmm. Cairo: Dâr al-Nahda al-‘Arabiyya.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, P., Read, R. and Sharrock, W. (2008) There Is No Such Thing as Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ibbetson, D. (2007) “Custom in Medieval Law” in Perreau-Saussine, A. and Murphy, J. B., eds., The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ibn Batutah, (1854) Al-Rihlat: Ibn Batutah’s Journeys, 1325–1354 (Arabic text with a French translation), 4 vols. Paris: Antropos.Google Scholar

Ibrahim, A. F. (2015) Pragmatism in Islamic Law: A Social and Intellectual History. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

ICC (2016) “The Prosecutor vs. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi” International Criminal Court [www.legal-tools.org/doc/042397/pdf].Google Scholar

Jackson, B. S. (1996) Making Sense in Jurisprudence. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.Google Scholar

Jarisha, ‘A. (1985) I‘lân dustûrî islâmî [Islamic Constitutional Declaration]. Cairo: al-Wafa Press.Google Scholar

Jeammaud, A. (1990) “La règle de droit comme modèle [The Rule of Law as a Model].” Recueil Dalloz: 199–210.Google Scholar

Jonkers, J. E. (1946) Handboek van het Nederlands indische Strafrecht [Handbook of Dutch Indian Criminal Law]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Jonsen, A. R. (1998) The Birth of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kammarti, B. (2017) “Des normes financières islamiques et de leurs circulations en France et en Grande-Bretagne [Islamic Financial Standards and Their Circulation in France and Great Britain].” Archives des Sciences Sociales des Religions [Archives of Social Studies of Religions] 179: 255–280.Google Scholar

Kantor, G. (2012) “Ideas of Law in Hellenistic and Roman Legal Practice” in Dresch, P. and Skoda, H., eds., Legalism: Anthropology and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kantorowicz, E. (2016 [1957]) The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, J. C. (1995) Corps de femmes, regards d’hommes [Women’s Bodies, Men’s Eyes]. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar

Kelk, C. (2001) Studieboek Materieel Strafrecht [Study Book Material Criminal Law]. Deventer: Gouda Quint.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. (1945) General Theory of Law and State. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. (1960) Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kerneis, S. (2018) “Introduction” in Kerneis, S., ed., Une histoire juridique de l’Occident, IIIe–IXe siècle: le droit et la coutume [A Legal History of the West, 3rd–9th Century: Law and Custom]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Khouri, N. (2005) “L’aliénation mentale et la maladie mentale: les fondements d’une circulation des savoirs en Egypte au XIXe siècle [Insanity and Mental Illness: The Foundations of the Circulation of Knowledge in Egypt in the 19th Century].” Outre-mers [Overseas] 92(346–7): 103–22.Google Scholar

Kletzer, C. (2007) “Custom and Positivity: An Examination of the Philosophic Ground of the Hegel-Savigny Controversy” in Perreau-Saussine, A and Murphy, J. B., eds., The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Köndgen, O. (2018) The Codification of Islamic Criminal Law in the Sudan: Penal Codes and Supreme Court Case Law under Numayrî and al-Bashîr. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Kosselleck, R. (1997) L’expérience de l’histoire [The Experience of History]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1996 [1962]) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuran, T. (2011) The Long Divergence: How Islamic Law Held Back the Middle East. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lambert, E. (1903) La Fonction du droit civil comparé – Vol. 1 Les conceptions étroites ou unilatérales [The Function of Comparative Civil Law – Vol. 1 Narrow or One-Sided Designs]. Paris: Giard et Brière.Google Scholar

Lambert, E. (1934) “Les rapports du droit et de la religion dans le monde musulman modern [Relations between Law and Religion in the Modern Muslim World]” in Congrès international de droit comparé de 1932 [International Congress of Comparative Law of 1932]. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar

Lamintang, P. A. F. (2014) Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia [Criminal Law Basics in Indonesia]. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2009) The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Layish, A. and Shmueli, A. (1979) “Custom and ‘Sharī’a’ in the Bedouin Family According to Legal Documents from the Judaean Desert.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 42(1): 29–45.Google Scholar

Leca, A. (2007) La Fabrique du droit français. Naissance, précellence et décadence d’un système juridique [The Making of French Law: Birth, Pre-excellence and Decline of a Legal System]. Aix-en-Provence: Librairie de l’Université d’Aix-en-Provence.Google Scholar

Le Camus, A. (2013 [1753]) La Médecine de l’esprit. [The Medicine of the Mind] Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. (1994) Le droit de la raison (textes réunis par René Sève) [The Right of Reason (Texts Collected by René Sève). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Lendrevie, I. (2008) Les transferts juridiques et juridictionnels en Egypte. L’héritage des années 1875–1949 [Legal and Jurisdictional Transfers in Egypt: The Legacy of the Years 1875–1949]. PhD dissertation, Université Paris I – Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Lendrevie-Tournan, I. (2004) “Réception et diffusion de certains principes du code civil français de 1804 en Egypte (1875–1949) [Reception and Dissemination of Certain Principles of the French Civil Code of 1804 in Egypt (1875–1949)].” Cahiers aixois d’histoire des droits de l’outre-mer français [Aixois Notebooks of the History of French Overseas Rights] 2: 139–157.Google Scholar

Lenoble, J. and Ost, F. (1980) Droit, mythe et raison. Essai sur la dérive mytho-logique de la rationalité juridique [Law, Myth and Reason: Essay on the Mytho-Logical Drift of Legal Rationality]. Brussels: Publications des Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis.Google Scholar

Le Roy, T. (2009) “Le constitutionnalisme: quelle réalité dans les pays du Maghreb? [Constitutionalism: What Reality in the Maghreb Countries?].” Revue française de droit constitutionnel [French Review of Constitutional Law] 79: 543–56.Google Scholar

Lev, D. S. (2000) Legal Evolution and Political Authority in Indonesia. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Lévy-Bruhl, L. (2010 [1922]) La Mentalité primitive [The Primitive Mind]. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Linant de Bellefonds, Y. (1965) Traité de droit musulman comparé – Vol.1 : Théorie générale de l’acte juridique [Treatise on Comparative Islamic Law – Vol. 1: General Theory of Legal Act]. Paris and The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Lindbekk, M. (2013) “The Enforcement of Personal Status Law in Egyptian Courts” in Giunchi, E., ed., Adjudicating Family Law in Muslim Courts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lindbekk, M. (2016) “Inscribing Islamic Sharī‘a in Egyptian Divorce Law.” Oslo Law Review 2(2): 103–35.Google Scholar

Livet, P. (1995) La Communauté virtuelle. Action et communication [The Virtual Community: Action and Communication]. Paris: L’Eclat.Google Scholar

Livet, P. (2005) “Les différentes formes de raisonnement par cas [The Different Forms of Reasoning by Case]” in Passeron, J. C. and Revel, J., eds., Penser par cas [Thinking by Case]. Paris: Editions de l’EHESS.Google Scholar

Livingston, E. (1995) An Anthropology of Reading. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Livingston, E. (2008) Ethnographies of Reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Livre d’Or (1926) Livre d’or du Cinquantenaire des Juridictions Mixtes d’Egypte 1876–1926 [Guestbook of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Mixed Jurisdictions of Egypt 1876–1926]. Alexandria: n.p.Google Scholar

Llewellyn, K. N. (1951) The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study. New York: Oceana.Google Scholar

Llewellyn, K. N. (2011) The Theory of Rules. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Llewellyn, K. N. and Hoebel, E. A. (1941) The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Lombardi, C. (2006) State Law as Islamic Law in Modern Egypt: The Incorporation of the Sharia into Egyptian Constitutional Law. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1986) “L’unité du système juridique [The Unity of the Legal System].” Archives de philosophie du droit 31: 163–86.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1993) Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lynch, M. (1997 [1979]) “Preliminary Notes on Judges’ Work: The Judge as a Constituent of Courtroom ‘Hearings’” in Travers, M. and Manzo, J. F., eds., Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Manin, B. (1995) Principes du gouvernement représentatif [Principles of Representative Government]. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar

Mattila, H. E. S. (2006) Comparative Legal Linguistics. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Mayers, M. A. (1984) A Century of Psychiatry: The Egyptian Mental Hospitals. Dissertation for the Doctorate in Philosophy, Princeton University.Google Scholar

Maynard, D. and Manzo, J. (1997 [1993]) “Justice as a Phenomenon of Order: Notes on the Organization of a Jury Deliberation” in Travers, M. and Manzo, J. F., eds., Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

M’Baye, K. (1970) “L’expérience sénégalaise de la réforme du droit [The Senegalese Experience of Law Reform].” Revue internationale de droit compare [International Journal of Comparative Law] 22(1): 35–42.Google Scholar

Meehan, A. (1997 [1988]) “Record-Keeping Practices in the Policing of Juveniles” in Travers, M. and Manzo, J. F., eds., Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Melissaris, E. (2014) “A Sense of Law: On Shared Normative Experiences” in Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L., eds., Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Menski, W. (2014) “Remembering and Applying Legal Pluralism: Law as Kite Flying” in Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L., eds., Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Messick, B. (1993) The Calligraphic State: Textual Domination and History in a Muslim Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Millard, E. (2011) “Bentham et la science du droit [Bentham and the Science of Law]” in Bozzo-Rey, M. and Tusseau, G., eds., Bentham juriste, l’utilitarisme juridique en question [Bentham the Jurist, Legal Utilitarianism in Question]. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Milliot, L. (1920–4) Recueil de jurisprudence chérifienne [Collection of Sherifian Case-Law] (4 vol.) Paris: Ed. E. Leroux.Google Scholar

Milliot, L. (2001 [1953]) Introduction à l’étude du droit musulman [Introduction to the Study of Muslim Law]. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, (1874 [1748]), De l’esprit des lois [Of the Spirit of Laws]. Paris: Garnier Frères.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, (1914 [1777]) The Spirit of the Laws (2 vols.) Public domain edition published by G. Bell & Sons, Ltd., London, rendered into HTML and text by The Constitution Society [www.consoc.org.uk], accessed May 16, 2007.Google Scholar

Mouaqit, M. (2011) Droit public musulman. Aspects classiques et contemporains [Islamic Public Law: Classic and Contemporary Aspects]. Casablanca: Afrique Orient.Google Scholar

Mouaqit, M. (2012) “Marginalité de la charia et centralité de la Commanderie des croyants: le cas paradoxal du Maroc [Marginality of Sharia and Centrality of the Commandery of Believers: The Paradoxical Case of Morocco]” in Dupret, B., ed., La Charia aujourd’hui. Usages de la référence au droit islamique [Sharia Today: Uses of the Reference to Islamic Law]. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Mouaqit, M. (2015) “Droit et changement politique et social au Maroc [Law and Political and Social Change in Morocco]” in Dupret, B., Rani, Z., Boutaleb, A., and Ferrié, J. N., eds., Le Maroc au présent. D’une époque à l’autre, une société en mutation. Casablanca: Fondation du Roi Abdul-Aziz.Google Scholar

Mouaqit, M. (2016) “Le droit de kad wa si’aya. Anthropologie d’un règle coutumière au Maroc [The Right of kad wa si’aya: Anthropology of a Customary Rule in Morocco]” in Rachik, H., ed., Contester le droit. Communautés, familles et héritage au Maroc [Challenging the Law: Communities, Families and Heritage in Morocco]. Rabat: La Croisée des Chemins.Google Scholar

Mouline, M. N. (2017) Fikrat al-dustûr fî’l-Maghrib [The Idea of Constitution in Morocco]. Rabat: TelQuel, Centre Jacques-Berque, TAFRA.Google Scholar

Muhammad, M. A. J. (1991) The Grounds of Positive Law Compared to the Grounds of Doctrine (in Arabic). Alexandria: Munshah al-Ma‘arif.Google Scholar

Murad, M. H., ed. (1991) Al-dustûr alladhî nutâlib bihi [The Constitution We Are Asking For]. Cairo: Amun Press.Google Scholar

Murir (al-) al-Titwani, Shaykh Muhammad (2011) al-Abhth al-Sâmiya fî al-Mahkim al-Islâmiyya [Advanced Researches in the Field of Islamic Courts]. Rabat: Dâr al-Hadîth al-Hasaniyya.Google Scholar

Murphy, J. B. (2005) The Philosophy of Positive Law: Foundations of Jurisprudence. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, J. B. (2007) “Habit and Convention at the Foundation of Custom” in Perreau-Saussine, A. and Murphy, J. B., eds., The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Obeyesekere, G. (1992) The Apotheosis of Captain Cook: European Mythmaking in the Pacific. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ogien, A. (1995) Sociologie de la deviance [Sociology of Deviance]. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Opwis, F. (2017) “New Trends in Islamic Legal Theory: Maqâsid al-Sharîʿa as a New Source of Law?” Die Welt des Islams [The World of Islam] 57(1): 7–32.Google Scholar

Otto, J. M., ed. (2010) Sharia Incorporated: A Comparative Overview of the Legal Systems of Twelve Muslim Countries in Past and Present. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar

Pangalo, L. (1932) “L’Age héroïque [The Heroic Age]” in Livre d’or du Cinquantenaire des Juridictions Mixtes d’Egypte 1876–1926 [Golden Book of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Mixed Courts of Egypt 1876–1926]. Alexandria: s.n.Google Scholar

Papadopoulo, A. (1976) L’islam et l’art musulman [Islam and Muslim Art]. Paris: Mazenod.Google Scholar

Parolin, G. (2015) “Introduction: Comment parle-t-on du ‘droit’ en Egypte? [Introduction: How Do We Speak of ‘Law’ in Egypt?]” Etudes Arabes 112: 1–22.Google Scholar

Parolin, G. (2018) “‘Translating’ the 1814 French Charter: Al-Tahtawi’s New Semiotics of Law and Governance.” Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law 19 (2016–2017): 188–223.Google Scholar

Passeron, J. C. and Revel, J. (2005) “Introduction” in Passeron, J. C. and Revel, J., eds., Penser par cas [Thinking by Case]. Paris: Editions de l’EHESS.Google Scholar

Peters, R. (1995) “Sharia and the State: Criminal Law in Nineteenth-Century Egypt” in van Dijk, C. and de Groot, A. H., eds., State and Islam. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar

Peters, R. (1999) “State, Law and Society in Nineteenth-Century Egypt: Introduction.” Die Welt des Islams [The World of Islam] 39: 267–72.Google Scholar

Peters, R. (2002) “From Jurists’ Law to Statute Law or What Happens When the Shari‘a Is Codified.” Mediterranean Politics 7(3): 82–95.Google Scholar

Pewzner, E. (2002) Naissance et développements de la psychopathologie [Birth and Development of Psychopathology]. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar

Pfersmann, O. (1998) “Arguments ontologiques et argumentation juridique [Ontological Arguments and Legal Argumentation].” Austriaca 47: 53–73.Google Scholar

Pfersmann, O. (2010) “Contre le pluralisme mondalisationnaliste. Pour un monisme juridique ouvert et différencié [Against Globalizationist Pluralism: For an Open and Differentiated Legal Monism].” Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie [Archive for Legal and Social Philosophy] 121: 131–44.Google Scholar

Pirie, F. (2013) The Anthropology of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pirie, F. (2015) “Rules, Proverbs, and Persuasion: Legalism and Rhetoric in Tibet” in Dresch, P. and Scheele, J., eds., Legalism: Rules and Categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pirie, F. (in 2020) “Laws and Proverbs: The Making and Unmaking of Moral Rules in Historic Tibet” in Dupret, B., Travers, M., and Colemans, J., eds., Legal Rules in Practice: In the Midst of Law’s Life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pirie, F. and Scheele, J., eds. (2014) Legalism: Community and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Prakash, G. (1999) Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Prashad, V. (1994) “Native Dirt/Imperial Ordure: The Cholera of 1832 and the Morbid Resolutions of Modernity.” Journal of Historical Sociology 7: 243–60.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A. (1988) “Democracy as a Contingent Outcome of Conflicts” in Elster, J. and Slagstad, R., eds., Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Qadri, M. (2006 [1900]) al-Ahkâm al-Shar‘iyya fî’l-Ahwâl al-Shakhṣiyya [The Divine Provisions in Matters of Personal Status], 4 vols. Cairo: Dâr al-Salâm.Google Scholar

Quéré, L. (1994) “Présentation” in Fradin, B., Quéré, L., Widmer, J., eds., L’enquête sur les catégories [The Enquiry on Categories]. Paris: Ed. de l’EHESS (Raisons pratiques 5).Google Scholar

Quétel, C. (2009) Histoire de la folie. De l’Antiquité à nos jours [History of Madness: From Antiquity to the Present Day]. Paris: Tallandier.Google Scholar

Rachik, H. (2003) Symboliser la nation. Essai sur l’usage des identités collectives au Maroc [Symbolize the Nation: Essay on the Use of Collective Identities in Morocco]. Casablanca: Editions le Fennec.Google Scholar

Radbruch, G. (2015 [1946]) “Injustice légale et droit supralégal [Legal Injustice and Supralegal Law]” in Béal, C., ed., Philosophie du droit. Norme, validité et interpretation [Philosophy of Law: Standard Norm, Validity and Interpretation]. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Raj, K. and Sibum, H. O. (2015) “Globalisation, science et modernité. De la guerre de sept ans à la Grande guerre [Globalization, Science and Modernity: From the Seven Years’ War to the Great War]” in Raj, K. and Sibum, H. O., eds., Histoire des sciences et des savoirs – Vol. 2: Modernité et globalisation [History of Science and Knowledge – Vol. 2: Modernity and Globalization]. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Raz, J. (1979) The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Raz, J. (1980) The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Reid, D. (1981) Lawyers and Politics in the Arab World. Minneapolis and Chicago: Bibliotheca Islamica.Google Scholar

Reimann, M. (1990) “Nineteenth Century German Legal Science.” Boston College Law Review 31: 837–900.Google Scholar

Renucci, F. (2015) “La Revue algérienne, tunisienne et marocaine de législation et de jurisprudence entre 1885 et 1916. Une identité singulière? [The Algerian, Tunisian and Moroccan Review of Legislation and Jurisprudence between 1885 and 1916: A Unique Identity?]” in Bras, J. P., ed., Faire l’histoire du droit colonial. Cinquante ans après l’indépendance de l’Algérie [Making the History of Colonial Law: Fifty Years after the Independence of Algeria]. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1997) La Métaphore vive [The Vivid Metaphor]. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Riker, W. H. (1986) The Art of Political Manipulation. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Rio, A. (2015) “‘Half-Free’ Categories in the Early Middle Ages: Fine Status Distinctions before Professional Lawyers” in Dresch, P. and Scheele, J., eds., Legalism: Rules and Categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, S. (1998) “Against Legal Pluralism: Some Reflections on the Contemporary Enlargement of the Legal Domain.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 42: 95–106.Google Scholar

Robertson, R. (1995) “Glocalisation: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity” in Featherstone, M., Lash, S., and Robertson, R., eds., Global Modernities. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Robinson, R. (1969) Essays in Greek Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rouland, N. (2003) “Acculturation juridique [Legal Acculturation]” in Alland, D. and Rials, S., eds., Dictionnaire de la culture juridique [Dictionary of Legal Culture]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Rubin, A. (2011) Ottoman Nizamiye Courts: Law and Modernity. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar

Rubin, A. (2016) “Modernity as a Code: The Ottoman Empire and the Global Movement of Codification.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 59: 828–56.Google Scholar

Ruskola, T. (2002) “Legal Orientalism.” Michigan Law Review 101(1): 179–234.Google Scholar

Sacks, H. (1972) “Notes on Police Assessment of Moral Character” in Sudnow, D., ed., Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Sacks, H. (1985) “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary’” in Atkinson, J., ed., Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sacks, H. (1997 [1962]) “The Lawyer’s Work” in Travers, M. and Manzo, J. F., eds., Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Saeed, A. (2014) “Sharia and Finance” in Peters, R. and Bearman, P., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to Islamic Law. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Saghieh, N. (2009) Aqwâs al-qazh amâm aqwâs al-mahâkim. Al-mithliyyûn fî qânûn al-‘uqûbât al-lubnânî [Homosexuals in the Lebanese Criminal Code]. Beirut: Helem.Google Scholar

Sahlins, M. (1995) How “Natives” Think. About Captain Cook, for Example. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Salaymeh, L. (2016) The Beginnings of Islamic Law: Late Antique Islamicate Legal Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sanhuri (al-), ‘A. R. (1996 [1952–70]), al-Wasît fî sharh al-qânûn al-madanî al-jadîd. Cairo: Dâr al-Nahdat al-‘Arabiyya [The Companion in the Understanding of the New Civil Law].Google Scholar

Savigny, F. C. von (1831) Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence. London: Littlewood.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. (1989) “Is the Common Law Law?” California Law Review 77: 455–71.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. (1991) Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. (2011) “Editor’s Introduction” in Llewellyn, K. N., The Theory of Rules. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. (2015) The Force of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Scheele, J. (2012) “Rightful Measures: Irrigation, Land, and the Shari’ah in the Algerian Touat” in Dresch, P. and Skoda, H., eds., Legalism: Anthropology and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scheele, J. (2015) “In Praise of Disorder: Breaking the Rules in Northern Chad” in Dresch, P. and Scheele, J., eds., Legalism: Rules and Categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scheffer, T. (2010) “Indirect Moralising: An Ethnographic Exploration of a Procedural Modality.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40(2): 111–35.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. (1987) “Between Macro and Micro: Contexts and Other Connections” in Alexander, J. et al., eds., The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Schröder, J. (2012) Recht als Wissenschaft: Geschichte der juristischen Methodenlehre in der Neuzeit (1500–1933) [Law as a Science: History of Legal Methodology in Modern Times (1500–1933)]. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Schütz, A. (1990) Collected Papers I – The Problem of Social Reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1996) The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Shaham, R. (1993) “A Woman’s Place: A Confrontation with Bedouin Custom in the Sharîʿa.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 113(2): 192–7.Google Scholar

Shaham, R. (1997) Family and the Courts in Modern Egypt: A Study Based on Decisions by the Sharî‘a Courts, 1900–1955. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Shaham, R. (2010) The Expert Witness in Islamic Courts: Medicine and Crafts in the Service of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Shalakani, A. (2006) “‘Heard It All Before’: Egyptian Tales of Law and Development.” Third World Quarterly 27(5): 833–53.Google Scholar

Shari’ah Standards (2015) “Shari’ah Standards for Islamic Financial Institutions” [https://aaoifi.com/shariaa-standards/?lang=en].Google Scholar

Sharrock, W. (1974) “On Owning Knowledge” in Turner, R., ed., Ethnomethodology. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Shklar, J. N. (1964) Legalism: An Essay on Law, Morals, and Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Simpson, A. W. B. (1994) “The Common Law and Legal Theory” in Dundes Renteln, A. and Dundes, A., eds., Folk Law: Essays in the Theory and Practice of Lex Non Scripta. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Soesilo, R. (2013) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal demi Pasal [Criminal Code (KUHP) and Article by Article Comments]. Bogor: Politeia.Google Scholar

Sohrabi, N. (2011) Revolution and Constitutionalism in the Ottoman Empire and Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sonneveld, N. (2012) Khul‘ Divorce in Egypt: Public Debates, Judicial Practices, and Everyday Life. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar

Souyri, P. F. (2016) Moderne sans être occidental: aux origines du Japon d’aujourd’hui [Modern without Being Western: The Origins of Present-Day Japan]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Stolleis, M. (2016) “Écrire l’histoire du droit: reconstruction, narration, fiction?” Conférence au Collège de France, 25 novembre [Writing the History of Law: Reconstruction, Narration, Fiction? Conference at the Collège de France, November 25],” [www.college-de-france.fr/site/alain-supiot/guestlecturer-2016-11-25-14h00.htm].Google Scholar

Sudnow, D. (1965) “Normal Crimes.” Social Problems 12: 255–76.Google Scholar

Supiot, A. (2015) La Gouvernance par les nombres: Cours au Collège de France (2012–2014) [Governance by Numbers: Course at the Collège de France (2012–2014)]. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Swain, G. (1976) “Pinel et la naissance de la psychiatrie. Un geste et un livre [Pinel and the Birth of Psychiatry: A Gesture and a Book].” L’information psychiatrique [Psychiatric Information] 52(10): 1217–28.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, B. Z. (1993) “The Folly of the ‘Social Scientific’ Concept of Legal Pluralis.” Journal of Law and Society 20(2): 192–217.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, B. Z. (1997) Realistic Socio-legal Theory: Pragmatism and a Social Theory of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2000) “A Non-essentialist Version of Legal Pluralism.” Journal of Law and Society 27(2): 192–217.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2001) A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2004) On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Terem, E. (2013) “Redefining Islamic Tradition: Legal Interpretation as a Medium for Innovation in the Making of Modern Morocco.” Islamic Law and Society 20(4): 425–75.Google Scholar

Testart, A. (2012) Avant l’histoire. L’évolution des sociétés, de Lascaux à Carnac [Before History: The Evolution of Societies, from Lascaux to Carnac]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Teubner, G. (1993) Law as an Autopoietic System. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Teunis, N. (2001) “Same-Sex Sexuality in Africa: A Case Study from Senegal.” AIDS and Behavior 5(2): 173–82.Google Scholar

Thomas, Y. (2002) “Présentation.” Annales HSS 57(6): 1425–8.Google Scholar

Tornatore, J. L. (2010) “L’esprit de patrimoine [The Spirit of Heritage].” Terrain 55: 106–27.Google Scholar

Toullier, C. B. M. (1824) Le Droit civil français suivant l’ordre du code (ouvrage dans lequel on a tâché de réunir la théorie à la pratique) [French Civil Law Following the Order of the Code (Work in which We Tried to Bring Together Theory and Practice)], 5th ed. Brussels: Wahlen et Cie.Google Scholar

Travers, M. (1997) The Reality of Law: Work and Talk in a Firm of Criminal Lawyers. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Travers, M. and Manzo, J., eds. (1997) Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Tresna, R. (1959) Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Disertai Pembahasan beberapa Perbuatan Pidana yang Penting [Basics of Criminal Law with Discussions of Some Important Criminal Acts]. Jakarta: Tiara.Google Scholar

Troper, M. (1994) Pour une théorie juridique de l’Etat [For a Legal Theory of the State]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Troper, M. (2003) “Science du droit [The Science of Law]” in Alland, D. and Rials, S., eds., Dictionnaire de la culture juridique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Utriza, A. (2013) “La réception du code pénal français et du droit pénal d’Europe en Indonésie [Reception of the French Penal Code and European Criminal Law in Indonesia]” in Jeanclos, Y., ed., La dimension historique de la peine: Origines et projections en Europe du Code pénal de 1810 [The Historical Dimension of the Sentence: Origins and Projections in Europe of the Penal Code of 1810]. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Valcke, C. (2014) “Three Perils of Legal Pluralism” in Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L., eds., Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Valensise, M. (1987) “La constitution française [The French Constitution]” in Baker, K., ed., The French Revolution and the Creation of Modern Political Culture, Vol. I, The Political Culture of the Old Regime. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Van Hoecke, M. (2014) “Do ‘Legal Systems’ Exist? The Concept of Law and Comparative Law” in Donlan, S. P. and Heckendorn Urscheler, L., eds., Concepts of Law: Comparative, Jurisprudential, and Social Science Perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Van Staëvel, J. P. (2008) Droit mâlikite et habitat à Tunis au XIVe siècle. Conflits de voisinage et normes juridiques d’après le texte du maître-maçon Ibn al-Râmî [Mālikite Law and Settlement in Tunis in the 14th Century: Neighborhood Conflicts and Legal Norms According to the Text of the Master Mason Ibn al-Râmî]. Cairo: Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale.Google Scholar

van Vollenhoven, C. (1928) De Ontdekking van het Adatrecht [The Discovery of Adatrecht]. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar

Varga, C. (2010) Codification as a Socio-historical Phenomenon. Budapest: Szent Istvan Tarsulat.Google Scholar

Vattel, E. de (1772) Dictionnaire universel et raisonné des connaissances humaines Dictionnaire universel et raisonné des connaissances humaines [Universal and Reasoned Dictionary of Human Knowledge]. Yverdon: F.-B. de Felice, vol. 11.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. (1982) “L’homosexualité à Rome [Homosexuality in Rome].” Communications 35: 26–33Google Scholar

Vikør, K. (2005) Between God and the Sultan: A History of Islamic Law. London: Hurst.Google Scholar

Von Benda-Beckmann, F. (2002) “Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 42: 37–82.Google Scholar

Watson, A. (1981) The Making of the Civil Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Watson, A. (1985) The Evolution of Law. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Watson, A. (1993 [1974]) Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar

Watson, R. (1997 [1983]) “The Presentation of Victim and Motive in Discourse: The Case of Police Interrogations and Interviews” in Travers, M. and Manzo, J.F., eds., Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Watson, R. (1998) “Ethnomethodology, Consciousness and Self.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 5(2): 202–23.Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1978 [1921]) Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Winch, P. (1990 [1958]) The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1963) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1975) Remarques philosophiques [Philosophical Remarks]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Wood, L. (2016) Islamic Legal Revival: Reception of European Law and Transformations in Islamic Legal Thought in Egypt, 1875–1952. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Woodman, G. (2009) “Diritto consuetudinari: una considerazione comparative sulla loro natura e sulle relazioni tra tipi di diritto.” Politica & Società 2: 91–107.Google Scholar

Yakin, A. U. (2015) “The Register of the Qadi Court ‘Kiyahi Pĕqih Najmuddin’ of the Sultanate of Bantĕn, 1754–1756 CE.” Studia Islamika: Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies 22:3: 405–42.Google Scholar

Yakin, A. U. (2016) “The Transliteration and Translation of the Leiden Manuscript Cod. Or, 5626 on the Sijill of the Qadi of Banten 1754–1756 CE.” Heritage of Nusantara. International Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage 5(1): 23–76.Google Scholar

Zappulli, L. (2001) “Les savoirs en action. La répartition géographique des auditeurs de justice à l’intérieur du dispositif de formation professionnelle [Knowledge in Action: The Geographical Distribution of Court Auditors within the Vocational Training System].” Droit et Société [Law and Society] 48: 417–37.Google Scholar

Ziadeh, F. (1968) Lawyers, the Rule of Law and Liberalism in Modern Egypt. Stanford: Hoover Institution.Google Scholar