Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds.) (2012a) Reading the Victory Ode. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds.) (2012b) Receiving the Komos: Ancient and Modern Receptions of the Victory Ode. London.Google Scholar

Alexiou, M. (2002) [1974] The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition, 2nd edn., rev. Yatromanolakis, D. and Roilos, P.. Lanham, Md.Google Scholar

Allen, T. W., Halliday, W. R., and Sikes, E. E. (eds.) (1936) The Homeric Hymns. Oxford.Google Scholar

Amandry, P. (1950) La mantique apollinienne à Delphes: Essai sur le fonctionnement de l’oracle. Paris.Google Scholar

Anzai, M. (1994) “First-person forms in Pindar: a re-examination,” BICS 39.1: 141–50.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1961) “What is Authority?,” in Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. New York: 91–142.Google Scholar

Ascoli, A. (2008) Dante and the Making of a Modern Author. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (1990) Mantic Vision and Diction in Pindar’s Victory Odes. PhD Diss. Brown Univ.Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (2004) “Deixis, Performance, and Poetics in Pindar’s First Olympian Ode,” Arethusa 37.3: 317–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (2009) “Apollo and His Oracle in Pindar’s Epinicians: Poetic Representations, Politics, and Ideology,” in Apolline Politics and Poetics, eds. Athanassaki, L., Martin, R. P., and Miller, J. F.. Athens: 405–72.Google Scholar

Auerbach, E. (2003) [1946] Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, tr. Trask, W. R.. Princeton.Google Scholar

Auger, D. (1987) “De l’artisan à l’athlète: les métaphores de la création poétique dans l’épinicie et chez Pindare,” in Costantini (1987), 39–56.Google Scholar

Averintsev, S. S. (1971) “Grecheskaia ‘literatura’ i blizhnevostochnaia ‘slovesnost” (protivostoianie i vstrecha dvukh tvorcheskikh printsipov),” in Tipologiia i vzaimosviazi literatur drevnego mira, eds. Grintser, P. A. et al. Moscow: 206–66.Google Scholar

Averintsev, S. S. (1973) Plutarkh i antichnaia biografiia. Moscow.Google Scholar

Averintsev, S. S. (1986) “Istoricheskaia podvizhnost’ kategorii zhanra: opyt periodizatsii,” in Istoricheskaia poetika: itogi i perspektivy izucheniia, eds. Khrapchenko, M. B. et al. Moscow: 104–16.Google Scholar

Averintsev, S. S. (1997) [1977] Poetika rannevizantiiskoi literatury. Moscow. [Italian translation: L’animo e lo specchio: l’universo della poetica bizantina. Bologna, 1988.]Google Scholar

Bachvarova, M. R. (2005) “The Eastern Mediterranean Epic Tradition from Bilgames and Akka to the Song of Release to Homer’s Iliad,” GRBS 45: 131–53.Google Scholar

Bachvarova, M. R. (2008) “Sumerian Gala Priests and Eastern Mediterranean Returning Gods: Tragic Lamentation in Cross-Cultural Perspective,” in Lament: Studies in the Ancient Mediterranean and Beyond, ed. Suter, A.. Oxford: 18–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bader, F. (1988) “Meillet et la poésie indo-européenne,” Cahiers Ferdinard de Saussure 42: 97–125.Google Scholar

Bader, F. (1989) La langue des dieux, ou l’hermétisme des poètes Indo-Européens. Testi linguistici 14. Pisa.Google Scholar

Bader, F. (1990) “Le liage; la peausserie et les poètes-chanteurs Homère et Hésiode: la racine *seh₂ «lier»,” Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 85: 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, tr. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M.. Austin.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1984a) [1963] Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, ed. and tr. Emerson, C.. Minneapolis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1984b) [1965] Rabelais and His World, tr. Iswolsky, H.. Bloomington.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1986) [1952–3] “The Problem of Speech Genres,” in Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, tr. by McGee, V. W.. Austin: 60–102.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (2015) [1940] “Satire,” tr. by Bird, R., in Kliger, and Maslov, (2015b), 369-91.Google Scholar

Balfour, I. (2002) The Rhetoric of Romantic Prophesy. Stanford.Google Scholar

Banfield, A. (1982) Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston.Google Scholar

Barrett, W. S. (1973) “Pindar’s Twelfth Olympian and the Fall of the Deinomenidai,” JHS 93: 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barron, J. P. (1984) “Ibycus: Gorgias and other poems,” BICS 31: 13–24.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1974) [1970] S/Z, tr. by Miller, R.. New York.Google Scholar

Bartol, K. (1993) Greek Elegy and Iambus: Studies in Ancient Greek Literary Sources. Poznań.Google Scholar

Baumbach, M. and Trampedach, K. (2004) “‘Winged Words’: Poetry and Divination in Posidippus’ Oiônoskopika,” in Labored in Papyrus Leaves: Perspectives on an Epigram Collection Attributed to Posidippus (P.Mil.Vogl. viii 309), eds. Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E., and Baumbach, M.. Cambridge, MA: 123–60.Google Scholar

Becker, O. (1940) “Pindars Olympische Ode vom Glück,” Die Antike 16: 38–50.Google Scholar

Beebee, Thomas O. (1994) The Ideology of Genre: A Comparative Study of Generic Instability. University Park, PA.Google Scholar

Beecroft, A. (2008) “World Literature Without a Hyphen,” New Left Review 54: 87–100.Google Scholar

Beecroft, A. (2010) Authorship and Cultural Identity in Early Greece and China: Patterns of Literary Circulation. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beekes, R. (2010) Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Leiden.Google Scholar

Ben-Amos, D. (1976) Folklore Genres. Austin.Google Scholar

Benedetti, C. (2005) [1999]. The Empty Cage: Inquiry into the Mysterious Disappearance of the Author, tr. by Hartley, W. J.. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Benveniste, E. (1947) “L’expression du serment dans la Grèce ancienne,” Revue de l’histoire des religions 134.1–3: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, N. (1978) “Parergon metricum: der Ursprung des griechischen Hexameters,” Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 37: 11–36.Google Scholar

Berg, N. and Haug, D. (2000) “Innovation and Tradition in Homer – an Overlooked Piece of Evidence,” SO 75: 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergren, A. L. T. (1982) “Sacred Apostrophe: Re-Presentation and Imitation in the Homeric Hymns,” Arethusa 15: 83–108.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (1988) The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloch, E. (1977) [1932] “Nonsynchronism and the Obligation to its Dialectics,” tr. by Ritter, M.. New German Critique 11: 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, H. (1982) Agon: Towards a Theory of Revisionism. Oxford.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, H. (1985) [1979] Work on Myth, tr. by Wallace, R. M.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, H. (2010) [1960] Paradigms for a Metaphorology, tr. Savage, R.. Ithaca.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogatyrev, P. (1969) “Tradition and Improvisation in Folk-Art,” in VII Congrès International des Sciences Anthropologiques et Ethnologiques 6. Moscow: 228–33.Google Scholar

Bogatyrev, P. and Jakobson, R. (1982) [1929] “Folklore as a Special Form of Creativity,” in Prague School: Selected Writings, 1929–1946, tr. by Jacobson, Manfred. Austin: 32–46. First published as “Die Folklore als eine besondere Form des Schaffens” (1929), in Verzaameling van Opstellen door Oud-leerlingen en Bevriende Vakgenooten. Donum Natalicium Schrijnen 3. Mei 1929. Nijmegen-Utrecht: 900–13.Google Scholar

Böhme, R. (1937) Das Prooimion, eine Form sakraler Dichtung der Griechen. Bühl Baden.Google Scholar

Borg, B. (2002) Der Logos des Mythos: Allegorien und Personifikationen in der frühen griechischen Kunst. Munich.Google Scholar

Botta, F. and Schironi, F. (1998) “Sull’ uso di ΣΥΝΘΕΣΙΣ nella critica letteraria antica,” Studi classici et orientali 46.3: 1049–77.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1996) [1992] The Rules of Art: The Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowden, H. (2005) Classical Athens and the Delphic Oracle: Divination and Democracy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bowie, A. M. (1981) The Poetic Dialect of Sappho and Alcaeus. Salem, NH.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (1986) “Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival,” JHS 106: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowra, C. M. (1961) Greek Lyric Poetry: From Alcman to Simonides. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bowra, C. M. (1964a) Pindar. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bowra, C. M. (1964b) Heroic Poetry. London.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. and Haubold, J. H. (eds.) (2010) Plato and Hesiod. Oxford.Google Scholar

Braun, J. T. (1971) The Apostrophic Gesture. The Hague.Google Scholar

Bremer, J. M. (1990) “Pindar’s Paradoxical ἐγώ and a Recent Controversy about the Performance of His Epinicia,” in ed. Slings, S. R., The Poet’s I in Archaic Greek Poetry: Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Amsterdam: 41–58.Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. N. (1996) “The Status and Symbolic Capital of the Seer,” ed. Hägg, R., The Role of Religion in the Early Greek Polis. Stockholm: 97–109.Google Scholar

Brooke-Rose, C. (1965) A Grammar of Metaphor. London.Google Scholar

Brown, C. G. (1997) “Iambos,” in A Companion to the Greek Lyric Poets, ed. Gerber, D. E.. Leiden: 11–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budelmann, F. (2012) “Epinician and the Symposion: A Comparison with the Encomia,” in Agócs, , Carey, and Rawles, (2012a), 173–90.Google Scholar

Budelmann, F. (ed.) (2009) The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bundy, E. L. (1954) Hesykhia in Pindar. PhD diss., UC Berkeley.Google Scholar

Bundy, E. L. (1986) [1962] Studia Pindarica. Berkeley. Revised Digital Version posted in 2006 at http://repositories.cdlib.org/ucbclassics/bundy/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burckhardt, J. (1979) [1871] Reflections on History, tr. Hottinger, M. D.. Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1962) “ΓΟΗΣ. Zum griechischen ‘Schamanismus’,” RhM 105.1: 36–55.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1983) Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1985) [1977] Greek Religion, tr. Raffan, J.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1987) “The Making of Homer in the Sixth Century B.C.: Rhapsodes Vs. Stesichorus,” in Papers on the Amasis Painter and His World, eds. True, M., et al. Malibu, Calif.: 43–62.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1992) The Orientalizing Revolution: Near Eastern Influence on Greek Culture in the Early Archaic Age. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (2005) “Hesiod in Context: Abstractions and Divinities in an Aegean-Eastern Koiné,” in Personification in the Greek world: From Antiquity to Byzantium, eds. Stafford, E. and Herrin, J.. Aldershot: 3–20.Google Scholar

Burnett, A. P. (2005) Pindar’s Songs for Young Athletes of Aigina. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bury, J. B., (ed.) (1890) The Nemean Odes of Pindar. London and New York.Google Scholar

Bury, J. B., (ed.) (1892) The Isthmian Odes of Pindar. London and New York.Google Scholar

Buxton, R. (2004) “Similes and Other Likenesses,” in Cambridge Companion to Homer, ed. Fowler, R.. Cambridge: 139–55.Google Scholar

Buxton, R. (ed.) (1999) From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, D. L. (2010) Bacchylides: Five Epinician Odes (3, 5, 9, 11, 13). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1972) Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (1974) “Réflexions sur les genres littéraires en Grèce archaïque,” QUCC 17: 113–28.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (1995) [1986] The Craft of Poetic Speech in Ancient Greece, tr. by Orion, Janice. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (1997) [1977] Choruses of Young Women in Ancient Greece: Their Morphology, Religious Role, and Social Function, tr. by Collins, D. and Orion, J.. Lanham, Md.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (1998) “La poésie lyrique grecque, un genre inexistant?,” Littérature 111: 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calame, C. (1999) “The Rhetoric of Mythos and Logos: Forms of Figurative Discourse,” in Buxton (1999), 119–43Google Scholar

Calame, C. (2003) Myth and History in Ancient Greece: The Symbolic Creation of a Colony. Princeton.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (2004) “Deictic Ambiguity and Aauto-Referentiality: Some Examples from Greek Poetics,” tr. Clay, J. Strauss, Arethusa 37.3: 415–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calame, C. (2009) “Fra racconto eroico e poesia rituale: il soggetto poetico che canta il mito (Pindaro, Olimpica 6),” QUCC NS 92.2: 11–26.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (2012) “Metaphorical Travel and Ritual Performance in Epinician Poetry,” in Agócs, Carey and Rawles (2012a), 303–20.Google Scholar

Callaway, C. (1993) “Perjury and the Unsworn Oath,” TAPA 123: 15–25.Google Scholar

Caner, D. (2006) “Towards a Miraculous Economy: Christian Gifts and Material ‘Blessings’ in Late Antiquity,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 14.3: 329–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, C. (1981) A Commentary on Five Odes of Pindar: Pythian 2, Pythian 9, Nemean 1, Nemean 7, Isthmian 8. Salem, NH.Google Scholar

Carey, C. (1991) “The Victory Ode in Performance: The Case for the Chorus,” CP 86: 192–200.Google Scholar

Carey, C. (2000) “The Panegyrist’s Persona,” Poesia e religione in Grecia: Studi in onore di G. Aurelio Privitera, eds. Fera, M. C. and Grandolini, S., vol. I. Naples: 165–78.Google Scholar

Carey, C. (2007) “Pindar, Place, and Performance,” in Hornblower and Morgan (2007), 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, C. (2009a) “Genre, Occasion, and Performance,” in Budelmann (2009), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, C. (2009b) “Iambos,” in Budelmann (2009), 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carne-Ross, D. S. (1985) Pindar. New Haven.Google Scholar

Casevitz, M. (1992) “Mantis: le vrai sens,” Revue des études grecques 105: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassio, A. C. (1999) “Futuri dorici, dialetto di Siracusa e testo antico dei lirici Greci,” Katà diálekton: Atti del III Colloquio Internazionale di Dialettologia, ed. Cassio, A. C.. Naples: 187–214.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1953) [1925] Language and Myth, tr. Langer, S. K.. New York.Google Scholar

Chadwick, H. M. and Chadwick, N. K. (1932–1940) The Growth of Literature. (3 vols.). Oxford.Google Scholar

Chartier, R. (1994) [1992] The Order of Books: Readers, Authors, and Libraries in Europe between the Fourteenth and the Eighteenth Centuries, tr. Cochrane, L. G.. Stanford.Google Scholar

Cheney, P. (1993) Spenser’s Famous Flight: A Renaissance Idea of a Literary Career. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheney, P. (2002) Shakespeare’s Literary Authorship. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (1999) “Pindar’s sympotic epinicia,” QUCC 62: 25–34.Google Scholar

Cohn, D. (1978) Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, T. (1983) “Archaic Truth,” QUCC 13.1: 7–28.Google Scholar

Cole, T. (1992) Pindar’s Feasts or the Music of Power. Rome.Google Scholar

Colonna, A. (ed.) (1951) Himeri declamationes et orationes. Rome.Google Scholar

Connor, W. R. (1984) Thucydides. Princeton.Google Scholar

Costantini, M. and Lallot, J. (1987) “Le προοίμιον est-il un proème,” in Costantini (1987), 13–27.Google Scholar

Costantini, M. et al. (eds.) (1987) Le texte et ses représentations. Paris.Google Scholar

Couloubaritsis, L. (1990) “De la généalogie à la genèséologie,” in Mattéi (1990), 83–96.Google Scholar

Couloubaritsis, L. (1995) “Transfigurations du paradigme de la parenté,” in Le paradigme de la filiation, eds. Gayon, J. and Wunenburger, J.-J.. Paris: 169–86.Google Scholar

Craig, D. (1975) [1972] “Towards Laws of Literary Development,” in Marxists on Literature: an Anthology. Baltimore: 134–60.Google Scholar

Croce, B. (1921) The Essence of Aesthetic, tr. Ainslie, D.. London.Google Scholar

Crotty, K. (1982) Song and Action: The Victory Odes of Pindar. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Culler, J. (1981) “Apostrophe,” in The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Ithaca: 135–55.Google Scholar

Currie, B. (2004) “Reperformance Scenarios for Pindar’s Odes,” in Oral Performance and Its Context, ed. Mackie, C. J.. Leiden.Google Scholar

Currie, B. (2005) Pindar and the Cult of Heroes. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Currie, B. (2013) “The Pindaric First Person in Flux,” CA 32.2: 243–82.Google Scholar

Curtius, E. R. (1990) [1948] European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, tr. Trask, W. R.. Princeton.Google Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (1994a) “First-Person Problems in Pindar,” BICS 39: 117–34.Google Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (1994b) Review of Käppel (1992), Classical Review 44.1: 62–5.Google Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (2004) “Past Future and Present Past: Temporal Deixis in Greek Archaic Lyric,” Arethusa 37.3: 267–94.Google Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (2009) “Defining Local Identities in Greek Lyric Poetry” in Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture: Travel, Locality and Pan-Hellenism, eds. Hunter, R. and Rutherford, I.. eds. Cambridge: 137–67.Google Scholar

Dal’, V. (1912–1914) Tolkovyi slovar’ zhivago velikorusskago iazyka, ed. Baudouin de Courtenay, I.. (4 vols.). St. Petersburg.Google Scholar

Dale, A. M. (1968) The Lyric Metres of Greek Drama. 2nd edn. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Davison, J. A. (1968) From Archilochus to Pindar: Papers on Greek Literature of the Archaic Period. London.Google Scholar

Dawe, R. D. (ed.) (2006) Oedipus Rex. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Day, J. W. (1989) “Rituals in Stone: Early Greek Grave Epigrams and Monuments,” JHS 109: 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Armas, F. (2002) “Cervantes and the Virgilian Wheel: The Portrayal of a Literary Career,” in European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance, eds. Cheney, P. and de Armas, F.. Toronto: 268–85.Google Scholar

de Man, P. (1984) The Rhetoric of Romanticism. New York.Google Scholar

Demoor, M. (ed.) (2004) Marketing the Author: Authorial Personae, Narrative Selves and Self-Fashioning, 1880–1930. Basingstoke, Hampshire.Google Scholar

Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (2000) “Introduction,” in Matrices of Genres: Authors, Canons, and Society, eds. Depew, M. and Obbink, D.. Cambridge, Mass.: 1–14.Google Scholar

Derrett, J. D. M. (1984) “Whatever Happened to the Land Flowing with Milk and Honey?,” Vigiliae Christianae 38: 178–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derrida, J. (1980) “The law of Genre,” tr. Ronell, A.. Critical Inquiry 7.1: 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Detienne, M. (1981) L’invention de la mythologie. Paris.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. (1996) [1967] The Masters of Truth in Archaic Greece, tr. Lloyd, J.. New York.Google Scholar

Diehl, E. (1940) “… Fuerunt ante Homerum poetae,” RhM 89: 81–114.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. (2005) “Chresmologues and Manteis: Independent Diviners and the Problem of Authority,” in Mantikê: Studies in Ancient Divination, eds. Johnston, S. I. and Struck, P. T.. Leiden: 167–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimock, W. Ch. (2006) Through Other Continents: American Literature Across Deep Time. Princeton.Google Scholar

Dobranski, S. (1999) Milton, Authorship, and the Book Trade. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1951) The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dornseiff, F. (1921) Pindars Stil. Berlin.Google Scholar

Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L. (2003) “Introduction: The Cultures within Greek Culture,” in The Cultures within Ancient Greek Culture: Contact, Conflict, Collaboration, eds. Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L.. Cambridge: 1–22.Google Scholar

Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L. (eds.) (1998) [1993] Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece: Cult, Performance, Politics. New York and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1964) “The Poetry of Archilochus,” in Archiloque. Fondation Hardt pour l’ étude de l’antiquité classique, Entrétiens 10. Geneva: 183–212.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1989) Greek Homosexuality. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Duchemin, J. (1955) Pindare poète et prophète. Paris.Google Scholar

Dumont, L. (1986) [1983] Essays on Individualism: Modern Ideology in Anthropological Perspective. Chicago.Google Scholar

Durante, M. (1976) Sulla preistoria della tradizione poetica greca. Vol. II. Rome.Google Scholar

Durkheim, É. (2008) [1912] The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, tr. Swan, J. W.. Mineola, NY.Google Scholar

Eckerman, C. (2012) “Was Epinician Poetry Performed at Panhellenic Sanctuaries?,” GRBS 52.3: 338–60.Google Scholar

Edmonds, R. G. (2004) Myths of the Underworld Journey: Plato, Aristophanes, and the “Orphic” Gold Tablets. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmunds, L. (1997) “The Seal of Theognis,” in Poet, Public and Performance in Ancient Greece, eds. Edmunds, L. and Wallace, R. W.. Baltimore: 29–48.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S. (1961) Selected Essays. London.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S. (1996) The Varieties of Metaphysical Poetry: The Clark Lectures at Trinity College, Cambridge, 1926, and the Turnbull Lectures at the Johns Hopkins University, 1933, ed. Schuchard, R.. San Diego.Google Scholar

Entralgo, P. L. (1970) The Therapy of the Word in Classical Antiquity. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Erbse, H. (1999) “Über Pindars Umgang mit dem Mythos,” Hermes 127.1: 13–32Google Scholar

Euler, W. (1979) Indoiranisch-griechische Gemeinsamkeiten der Nominalbildung und deren indogermanische Grundlagen. Innsbruck.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Faraone, C. A. (2008) The Stanzaic Architecture of Early Greek Elegy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faraone, C. (2015) “On the Eve of Epic: Did the Chryses Episode in Iliad 1 Begin Its Life as a Separate Homeric Hymn?,” in Kliger and Maslov (2015b), 397–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Färber, H. (1936) Die Lyrik in der Kunsttheorie der Antike. Munich.Google Scholar

Farnell, L. R. (1907) The Cults of Greek States, vol. IV. Oxford.Google Scholar

Farnell, L. R. (1932) The Works of Pindar. Vol. II: Critical Commentary. London.Google Scholar

Fascher, E. (1927) ΠΡΟΦΗΤΗΣ: Eine sprach- und religionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Gießen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. (1993) “Horace and the Greek Lyric Poets,” in Horace 2000: A Celebration: Essays for the Bimillennium, ed. Rudd, N.. London: 41–63.Google Scholar

Fennell, C. A. (1893) Pindar: The Olympian and Pythian Odes. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fennell, C. A. (1899) Pindar: The Nemean and Isthmian Odes. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Findlay, L. M. (1985) “Culler and Byron on Apostrophe and Lyric time,” Studies in Romanticism 24: 335–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finglass, P. J. (2007) Pythian Eleven. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelberg, M. (1986) “Is ΚΛΕΟΣ ΑΦΘΙΤΟΝ a Homeric formula?,” CQ 36: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelberg, M. (2007) “More on ΚΛΕΟΣ ΑΦΘΙΤΟΝ,” CQ 57.2: 341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finley, J. H. (1955) Pindar and Aeschylus. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnegan, R. H. (1992) Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance, and Social Context. Bloomington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (1987) Agonistic Poetry: The Pindaric Mode in Pindar, Horace, Hölderlin, and the English Ode. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2008) The Seer in Ancient Greece. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Fogelmark, S. (1972) Studies in Pindar with Particular Reference to Paean VI and Nemean VII. Lund.Google Scholar

Foley, J. M. (1991) Immanent Art: From Structure to Meaning in Traditional Oral Epic. Bloomington.Google Scholar

Fontonrose, J. A. (1978) Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, A. (1981) A Study of Early Greek Terms for Poetry: Aoidē, Epos and Poiēsis. PhD diss., Yale University.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (1988) “The Classical Definition of ΡΑΨΩΙΔΙΑ,” CP 83.4: 300–7.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (2004) Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (2006) “The Genre of Genres: Paeans and Paian in Early Greek Poetry,” Poetica 38: 277–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forssman, B. (1966) Untersuchungen zur Sprache Pindars. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1970) [1966] The Order of Things: An Archaeology of Human Sciences. New York.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1972) [1969] The Archaeology of Knowledge, tr. Smith, A. M. Sheridan. New York.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1984) “What Is an Author?,” in The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, P., tr. Harari, J. V.. New York: 101–20.Google Scholar

Fowler, A. (1982) Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Fowler, A. (2003) “The Formation of Genres in the Renaissance and After,” New Literary History 34: 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, R. L. (1987) The Nature of Early Greek Lyric: Three Preliminary Studies. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1950) Aeschylus. Agamemnon. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1957) Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar

Francis, E. D. (1972) “Pindar fr. 104b Snell,” CQ 22: 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1921) Die homerischen Gleichnisse. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1927) “Pindars Religion,” Die Antike 3: 39–63.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1968) Wege und Formen frühgriechischen Denkens. Munich.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1975) [1951] Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy: A History of Greek Epic, Lyric, and Prose to the Middle of the Fifth Century, tr. Hadas, M. and Willis, J.. New York.Google Scholar

Freidenberg, O. M. (1940) “Ob osnovnom kharaktere grecheskoi literatury,” Uchenye zapiski leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 60 (Seriia filologicheskikh nauk 6): 32–50.Google Scholar

Freidenberg, O. M. (1941) “Problema grecheskogo fol’klornogo iazyka,” Uchenye zapiski leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 63 (Seriia filologicheskikh nauk 7): 41–69.Google Scholar

Freidenberg, O. M. (1991a) “The Origin of the Greek Lyric,” Soviet Studies in Literature 27.3: 3–19. [Originally published in 1973, written in 1946.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freidenberg, O. M. (1991b) [1946] “The Origin of the Epic Simile: On Material from the Iliad,” Soviet Studies in Literature 27.3: 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freidenberg, O. M. (1997) Image and Concept: Mythopoetic Roots of Literature, ed. Braginskaia, N., tr. Moss, K.. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Freidenberg, O. M. (2008) Mif i literatura drevnosti, 3rd edn. Ekaterinburg.Google Scholar

Freidenberg, O. M. (2015) [1946] “The Oresteia in the Odyssey,” in Kliger and Maslov (2015b), 165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frisk, H. (1960–1972) Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. (3 vols.). Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Fröhder, D. (1994) Die dichterische Form der Homerischen Hymnen untersucht am Typus der mittelgrossen Preislieder. Spudasmata 53. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. (1989) [1960] Truth and Method. London.Google Scholar

Galvez, M. (2012) Songbook: How Lyrics Became Poetry in Medieval Europe. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

García, J. F. (2002) “Symbolic Action in the Homeric Hymns: The Theme of Recognition,” CA 21.1: 5–39.Google Scholar

Garvie, A. F. (1986) Aeschylus. Choephori. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gasparov, M. L. (1981) “Stroenie epinikiia,” in Poetika drevnegrecheskoi literatury, ed. Averintsev, S. S.. Moscow: 290–330.Google Scholar

Gasparov, M. L. (1999) Metr i smysl: ob odnom iz mekhanizmov kul’turnoi pamiati. Moscow.Google Scholar

Gasparov, M. L. (2007) “Vvedenie,” in Lirika: genezis i evoliutsiia, eds. Matiushina, I. G. and Nekliudov, S. Iu.. Moscow: 7–12.Google Scholar

Gelzer, T. (1981) “Pindarverständis und Pindarübersetzung im deutschen Sprachbereich vom 16. bis zum 18. Jahrhundert,” in Geschichte des Textverständnisses am Beispiel von Pindar und Horaz, ed. Killy, W.. Munich: 81–116.Google Scholar

Gelzer, T. (1985) “Μοῦσα αὐθιγενής: Bemerkungen zu einem Typ pindarischer und bacchylideischer Epinikien,” MH 42: 95–120.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1992) [1979] The Architext: An Introduction, tr. Lewin, J. E.. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Gentili, B. (1977) “Preistoria e formazione dell’esametro,” QUCC 26: 7–37.Google Scholar

Gentili, B. (1988) [1985] Poetry and Its Public in Ancient Greece: From Homer to the Fifth Century. Baltimore and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, D. E. (1982) Pindar’s Olympian One: A Commentary. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, D. E. (1997) “Elegy,” in A Companion to The Greek Lyric Poets, ed. Gerber, D. E.. Mnemosyne Suppl. 173. Leiden: 59–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gernet, L. (1979) [1955] Droit et société dans la Grèce ancienne. New York.Google Scholar

Gernet, L. (1981) [1968] The Anthropology of Ancient Greece. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Gianotti, G. F. (1975) Per una poetica pindarica. Turin.Google Scholar

Gildersleeve, B. L. (ed.) (1885) Pindar. The Olympian and Pythian Odes. New York.Google Scholar

Ginzburg, C. (1999) “Aristotle and History, Once More,” in History, Rhetoric, and Proof. Hanover, NH: 38–53.Google Scholar

Ginzburg, L. (1974) O lirike, 2nd edn. Leningrad.Google Scholar

Ginzburg, L. (1991) [1971] On Psychological Prose, tr. Rosengrant, J.. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godzich, W. and Kittay, J. (1987) The Emergence of Prose: An Essay in Prosaics. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Golden, M. (1998) Sport and Society in Ancient Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1991) The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goody, J. (1977) The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goram, O. (1859) “Pindari translationes et imagines,” Philologus 14: 241–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, J. (1980) “Law, Custom and Myth: Aspects of the Social Position of Women in Classical Athens,” JHS 100: 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grafton, A. and Most, G. W. and Settis, S. (eds.) (2010) The Classical Tradition. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Grant, M. A. (1968) Folktale and Hero-Tale Motifs in the Odes of Pindar. Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar

Grauer, V. A. (2006) “Echoes of Our Forgotten Ancestors,” The World of Music 48.2: 5–58.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, S. (1980) Renaissance Self-Fashioning: from More to Shakespeare. Chicago.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, S. (1988) Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, S. (1997) “What is the History of Literature?,” Critical Inquiry 23.3: 460–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greengard, C. (1980) The Structure of Pindar’s Epinician Odes. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Griffin, D. (2014) Authorship in the Long Eighteenth Century. Newark.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (1983) “Personality in Hesiod,” CA 2.1: 37–65.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (2009) “Apollo, Teiresias, and the Politics of Tragic Prophecy,” in Apolline Politics and Poetics, eds. Athanassaki, L., Martin, R. P. and Miller, J. F.. Athens: 473–500.Google Scholar

Grinbaum, N. S. (1973) Iazyk drevnegrecheskoi khorovoi liriki (Pindar). Kishinev.Google Scholar

Grinbaum, N. S. (1990) Khudozhestvennyi mir antichnoi poezii: tvorcheskii poisk Pindara. Moscow.Google Scholar

Groningen, B. A. van (1955) “Ad Pindari dithyrambi fragmentum 75 S,” Mnemosyne 8: 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guillén, C. (1971) [1969] “Literature as System,” in Literature as System: Essays Toward the Theory of Literary History. Princeton: 375–419.Google Scholar

Gundert, H. (1935) Pindar und sein Dichterberuf. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Hackstein, O. (2002) Die Sprachform der homerischen Epen: Faktoren morphologischer Variabilität in literarischen Frühformen: Tradition, Sprachwandel, Sprachliche Anachronismen. Serta Graeca 15. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (2006) The Veil of Isis: An Essay on the History of the Idea of Nature. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2002) The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, J. T. (2003) Soliciting Darkness: Pindar, Obscurity, and the Classical Tradition. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Hamilton, R. (1974) Epinikion: General Form in the Odes of Pindar. The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, R. (1984) “Olympian 12 and the Coins of Himera,” Phoenix 38.3: 261–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (1995) “Horace, Pindar, Iullus Antonius, and Augustus: Odes 4.2,” in Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford: 108–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2007) Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, A. E. (1955) “The Classification of Greek Lyric Poetry.” CQ N.S. 5: 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haug, D. (2002) Les phases de l’évolution de la langue épique: Trois études de linguistique homérique. Hypomnemata 142. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haug, D. and Welo, E. (2001) “The Pproto-Hexameter Hypothesis: Perspectives for Further Research,” SO 76: 130–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Havelock, E. (1963) Preface to Plato. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Havelock, E. (1982) The Literate Revolution in Greece and Its Cultural Consequences. Princeton.Google Scholar

Hayot, E. (2012) On Literary Worlds. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, M. (1988) “Receiving the κῶμος: The Context and Performance of the Epinician,” AJP 109: 180–95.Google Scholar

Heinrichs, W. (1977) The Hand of the Northwind: Opinions on Metaphor and the Early Meaning of istiʿāra in Arabic Poetics. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Helgerson, R. (1983) Self-Crowned Laureates: Spenser, Jonson, Milton, and the Literary System. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Henkel, A. (1981) “‘Der deutsche Pindar’ – Zur Nachahmungsproblematik im 18. Jahrhundert,” in Geschichte des Textverständnisses am Beispiel von Pindar und Horaz, ed. Killy, W.. Munich: 173–94.Google Scholar

Henrichs, A. (1995) “‘Why should I dance?’ Choral Self-refentiality in Greek Tragedy,” Arion 3.1: 56–111.Google Scholar

Henrichs, A. (1996) “Dancing in Athens, Dancing on Delos: Some Patterns of Choral Projection in Euripides,” Philologus 140.1: 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herder, J. G. von (1993) Against Pure Reason: Writings on Religion, Language, and History, ed. and tr. Bunge, M.. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Herder, J. G. von (2002) Philosophical Writings, ed. and tr. Forster, M. N.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Herington, C. J. (1985) Poetry into Drama: Early Tragedy and the Greek Poetic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Heubeck, A. (1972) “Syllabic ṛ in Mycenaean Greek?” Minos 12 = Acta Mycenaea: Proceedings of the Fifth International Colloquium on Mycenaean Studies, 55–79.Google Scholar

Highbarger, E. L. (1935) “The Pindaric Style of Horace,” TAPA 66: 222–55.Google Scholar

Historical Poetics: An Online Resource. http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/historicalpoetics/.Google Scholar

Hobbins, D. (2009) Authorship and Publicity Before Print: Jean Gerson and the Transformation of Medieval Learning. Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekstra, A. (1965) Homeric Modifications of Formulaic Prototypes. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, A. (1981) Epic Verse before Homer. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Hölscher, U. (1989) Die Odyssee: Epos zwischen Märchen und Roman. Munich.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (2009) “Greek Lyric and the Politics and Sociologies of Archaic and Classical Greek Communities,” in Budelmann (2009), 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornblower, S. and Morgan, C. (eds.) (2007) Pindar’s Poetry, Patrons, and Festivals: From Archaic Greece to Roman Empire. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horrocks, G. C. (1997) “Homer’s Dialect,” in A New Companion to Homer, eds. Morris, I. and Powell, B.. Leiden: 193–217.Google Scholar

Hubbard, T. K. (1985) The Pindaric Mind: A Study of Logical Structure in Early Greek Poetry. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubbard, T. K. (1986) “Pegasus’ Bridle and the Poetics of Pindar’s Thirteenth Olympian,” HSCP 90: 27–48.Google Scholar

Hubbard, T. K. (1987) “Two Notes on the Myth of Aeacus in Pindar,” GRBS 28: 5–22.Google Scholar

Hubbard, T. K. (2004) “The Dissemination of Epinician Lyric: Pan-Hellenism, Reperformance, Written Texts,” in Oral Performance and Its Context, ed. Mackie, C. J.. Leiden: 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubbard, T. K. (2011) “The Dissemination of Pindar’s Non-Epinician Choral Lyric,” in Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination, eds. Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E.. Berlin: 347–63.Google Scholar

Hummel, P. (1993) La syntaxe de Pindare. Paris.Google Scholar

Humphreys, S. (1985) “Social relations on stage: Witnesses in Classical Athens,” History and Anthropology 1: 313–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. (1997) “Hellenismus,” in Einleitung in die griechische Philologie, ed. Nesselrath, Heinz-Günther. Stuttgart: 246–68.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2001) Greek Lyric Poetry: A Commentary on Selected Larger Pieces. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2012) “Image and World in Epinician Poetry,” in Agócs, Carey and Rawles (2012a), 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irigoin, J. (1952) Histoire du texte de Pindare. Paris.Google Scholar

Irigoin, J. (1953) Recherches sur les mètres de la lyrique chorale grecque. La structure du vers. Paris.Google Scholar

Itsumi, K. (2009) Pindaric Metre: the ‘Other Half’. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, P. (2006a) “The Poetics of Myth in Pindar’s Olympian 9, 47–9,” in La langue poétique indo-européenne: Actes du Colloque de travail de la Société des Études Indo-Européennes, eds. Pinault, G.-J. and Petit, D.. Leuven: 125–32.Google Scholar

Jackson, P. (2006b) The Transformations of Helen: Indo-European Myth and the Roots of the Trojan Cycle. Dettelbach.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1952) “Studies in Comparative Slavic Metrics,” Oxford Slavonic Papers 3: 21–66, reprinted under the title “Slavic Epic Verse: Studies in Comparative Metrics” in Selected Writings, vol. IV (1966). The Hague: 414–63.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1987) [1960] “Linguistics and Poetics,” in Language in Literature, ed. Pomorska, K. and Rudy, S.. Cambridge, Mass: 62–94.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (2011) Formal’naia shkola i sovremennoe russkoe literaturovedenie. [Jakobson’s lectures from the 1930s.] Moscow.Google Scholar

Jameson, F. (1975–6) “The Ideology of the Text.” Salmagundi 31–32: 204–46.Google Scholar

Jameson, F. (1981) The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (1982) Homer, Hesiod, and the Hymns: Diachronic Development in Epic Diction. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Japp, U. (1980) Beziehungssinn: Ein Konzept der Literaturgeschichte. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Jason, H. (1977) Ethnopoetry: Form, Content, Function. Bonn.Google Scholar

Jauss, H. R. (1970) “Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory,” New Literary History 2.1: 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jebb, R. (ed.) (1905) Bacchylides: The Poems and Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jeremiah, E. T. (2012) The Emergence of Reflexivity in Greek Language and Thought: From Homer to Plato and Beyond. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaimio, M. (1970) The Chorus of Greek Drama within the Light of the Person and Number Used. Helsinki.Google Scholar

Kambylis, A. (1965) Die Dichterweihe und ihre Symbolik: Untersuchungen zu Hesiodos, Kallimachos, Properz und Ennius. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Käppel, L. (1992) Paian. Studien zur Geschichte einer Gattung. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, N. T. (1975) “Pindar and Horace,” Acta Classica 18: 9–24.Google Scholar

Kerferd, G. B. (1976) “The Image of the Wise Man in Greece in the Period Before Plato,” in Images of Man in Ancient and Medieval Thought: Studia Gerardo Verbeke ab amicis et collegis dicata, eds. Bossier, F. et al. Leuven: 17–28.Google Scholar

Kimmelman, B. (1996) The Poetics of Authorship in the Later Middle Ages. New York.Google Scholar

Kirschkowski, M. (2009) Norm und Identität: Untersuchungen zur Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit in der Dichtung Pindars. Freiburg.Google Scholar

Kliger, I. (2010) “World Literature Beyond Hegemony in Yuri Lotman’s Cultural Semiotics,” Comparative Critical Studies 7.2–3: 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kliger, I. (2011) The Narrative Shape of Truth: Veridiction in Modern European Literature. University Park, PA.Google Scholar

Kliger, I. (2012) “Resurgent Forms in Ivan Goncharov and Alexander Veselovsky: Towards a Historical Poetics of Tragic Realism,” The Russian Review 71.4: 655–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kliger, I. (2015) “On ‘Genre Memory’ in Bakhtin,” in Kliger and Maslov (2015b), 227–51.Google Scholar

Kliger, I. and Maslov, B. (2015a) “Introducing Historical Poetics: History, Experience, Form,” in Kliger and Maslov (2015b), 1-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kliger, I. and Maslov, B. (2015b) Persistent Forms: Explorations in Historical Poetics. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kloch-Kornitz, P. von (1961) “Die religiöse Problematik in Pindars Nemea VI im Vergleich mit Goethes Gedichten ‘Grenzen der Menschheit’ und ‘Das Göttliche,’” Antike und Abendland 10: 155–9.Google Scholar

Knights, L. C. (1960) “Idea and Symbol: Some Hints from Coleridge,” in Metaphor and Symbol, eds. Knights, L. C. and Cottle, Basil. London: 135–47.Google Scholar

Köhnken, A. (1971) Die Funktion des Mythos bei Pindar: Interpretationen zu sechs Pindargedichten. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Köhnken, A. (1974) “Pindar as innovator: Poseidon Hippios and the relevance of the Pelops story in Olympian 1,” CQ NS 24.2: 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Köhnken, A. (1975) “Gods and Descendants of Aiakos in Pindar’s Eighth Isthmian Ode,” BICS 22: 25–36.Google Scholar

Koller, H. (1956) “Das kitharodische Prooimion. Eine formgeschichtliche Untersuchung,” Philologus 100: 159–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koller, H. (1963) Musik und Dichtung im Alten Griechenland. Bern.Google Scholar

Koller, H. (1965) “Melos,” Glotta 43: 24–38.Google Scholar

Koller, H. (1972) “ΕΠΟΣ,” Glotta 50: 16–24.Google Scholar

Komornicka, Anna M. (1972) “Quelques remarques sur la notion d’ ἀλάθεια et de ψεῦδος chez Pindare,” Eos 60: 235–53.Google Scholar

Kowalzig, B. (2007) Singing for the Gods: Performances of Myth and Ritual in Archaic and Classical Greece. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kracauer, S. (1995) [1969] History: The Last Things before the Last. Princeton.Google Scholar

Kranz, W. (1961) “Sphragis: Ichform und Namensiegel als Eingangs-und Schlussmotiv antiker Dichtung,” RhM 104: 3–46.Google Scholar

Krischer, T. (1965) “ΕΤΥΜΟΣ und ΑΛΗΘΗΣ,” Philologus 109.3: 161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krummen, E. (1990) Pyrsos Hymnon: Festliche Gegenwart und mythisch-rituelle Tradition als Voraussetzung einer Pindarinterpretation (Isthmie 4, Pythie 5, Olympie 1 und 3). Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kudelin, A. B. (2007) “Stilisticheskaia evoliutsiia arabskoi poezii VI-IX vv.,” in Lirika: genezis i evoliutsiia, eds. Matiushina, I. G. and Nekliudov, S. Iu.. Moscow: 148–74.Google Scholar

Kullmann, W. and Reichel, M. (eds.) (1990) Der Übergang von der Mündlichkeit zur Literatur bei den Griechen. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (1988) “The poet’s pentathlon: genre in Pindar’s First Isthmian,” GRBS 29.2: 97–113.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (1989) “Pouring prayers: a formula of Indo-European sacral poetry?,” The Journal of Indo-European Studies 17.1–2: 113–25.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (1990) “Pindar’s Sixth Pythian and the Tradition of Advice Poetry,” TAPA 120: 85–107.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (1991) The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (1992) “The Politics of ἁβροσύνη in Archaic Greece,” CA 11: 91–120.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (1999) Coins, Bodies, Games, and Gold: The Politics of Meaning in Archaic Greece. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (2000) “The Strangeness of ‘Song Culture’: Archaic Greek Poetry,” in Literature in the Greek World, ed. Taplin, O.. Oxford: 40–69.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (2003) “Aesop and the Contestation of Delphic Authority,” in The Cultures within Ancient Greek Culture: Contact, Conflict, Collaboration, eds. Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L.. Cambridge: 77–100.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (2005) “Choral Lyric As ‘Ritualization’: Poetic Sacrifice and Poetic Ego in Pindar’s Sixth Paian,” CA 24.1: 81–130.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (2006) “Plato, Aesop, and the Beginnings of Mimetic Prose,” Representations 94: 6–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (2007a) “Archaic Greek Poetry,” in The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Shapiro, H. A.. Cambridge: 141–68.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (2007b) “Visualizing the Choral: Epichoric Poetry, Ritual, and Elite Negotiation in Fifth-Century Thebes,” in Visualizing the Tragic: Drama, Myth, and Ritual in Greek Art and Literature: Essays in Honour of Froma Zeitlin, eds. Kraus, C. et al. Oxford: 62–101.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (2011) Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose. Princeton.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. V. (2013) “Pindar’s Pythian 11 and the Oresteia: Contestatory Ritual Poetics in the 5th c. BCE,” CA 32.1: 101–75.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambin, G. (1992) La chanson grecque dans l’antiquité. Paris.Google Scholar

Lang, A. (1884) Custom and Myth. London.Google Scholar

Lardinois, A. (1996) “Who Sang Sappho’s Songs?,” in Reading Sappho: Contemporary Approaches, ed. Greene, E.. Berkeley: 150–72.Google Scholar

Lardinois, A. (2001) “Keening Sappho: Female Speech Genres in Sappho’s Poetry,” in Making Silence Speak: Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society, eds. Lardinois, A. and McClure, L.. Princeton: 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latacz, J. (1998) “Epos. II: Klassische Antike,” Der Neue Pauly, vol. 4. Stuttgart: col. 11–22.Google Scholar

Latte, K. (1931) “Beiträge zum griechischen Strafrecht,” Hermes 66: 30–48.Google Scholar

Lattmann, C. (2010) Das Gleiche im Verschiedenen: Metapher des Sports und Lob des Siegers in Pindars Epinikien. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leader, Z. (1996) Revision and Romantic Authorship. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefkowitz, M. R. (1963) “ΤΩ ΚΑΙ ΕΓΩ : The first Person in Pindar,” HSCP 67: 177–253.Google Scholar

Lefkowitz, M. R. (1991) First-Person Fictions: Pindar’s Poetic “I”. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lejeune, M. (1972) Phonétique historique du mycénien et du grec ancien. Paris.Google Scholar

Leumann, M. (1959) [1927] “Zum Mechanismus des Bedeutungswandels,” in Kleine Schriften. Zurich: 286–96.Google Scholar

Levinton, G. A. (1974) “Some Problems of Meaning in the Folklore Texts,” Acta Ethnographica Academiae Scientiarium Hungaricae 23: 149–61.Google Scholar

Levinton, G. A. (1975) “Zamechaniia k probleme ‘literatura i fol’klor’.” Σημειωτική: Trudy po znakovym sistemam 7: 76–87.Google Scholar

Levinton, G. A. (1995) “Russkoe svadebnoe velichanie (k probleme imeni i otchestva v obriadovom tekste),” International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 38: 94–118.Google Scholar

Likhachev, D. S. (1962) “Time in Russian folklore,” International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 5: 74–96.Google Scholar

Likhachev, D. S. (1979) [1967] Poetika drevnerusskoi literatury, 3rd edn. Moscow.Google Scholar

Lincoln, B. (1996) “Gendered Discourses: The Early Greek History of Mythos and Logos,” History of Religions 36.1: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. (1973) “Modern Interpretation of Pindar: The Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes,” JHS 93: 109–37.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, J. (2002) Ben Jonson and Possessive Authorship. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lomax, A. (1962) “Song Structure and Social Structure,” Ethnology 1.4: 425–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lomax, A. (1980) “Factors of Musical Style,” in Theory and Practice: Essays Presented to Gene Weltfish, ed. Diamond, S.. The Hague: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longo, O. (1991) “Classificatorio e descrittivo nella terminologia pindarica della parentela,” in Koinon aima: antropologia e lessico della parentela greca, eds. Avezzù, Elisa and Longo, Oddone. Bari: 109–26.Google Scholar

Lonsdale, S. H. (1995) “Homeric Hymn to Apollo: prototype and paradigm of choral performance,” Arion. 3rd Ser. 3.1: 25–40.Google Scholar

Lord, A. B. (2000) [1960] The Singer of Tales, 2nd edn., ed. Mitchell, S. and Nagy, G.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Loscalzo, D. (2003) La parole inestinguibile: studi sull’ epinicio pindarico. Rome.Google Scholar

Lotman, Yu. M. (1974) [1973] “O. M. Freidenberg as a Student of Culture,” in Semiotics and Structuralism: Readings from the Soviet Union, ed. Baran, H.. White Plains, NY: 257–68.Google Scholar

Lotman, Yu. M. (1979) [1973] “The origin of the Plot in the Light of Typology,” tr. Graffy, J.. Poetics Today 1.1–2: 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lotman, Yu. M. (1984) [1975] “The Decembrist in Everyday Life: Everyday Behavior as a Historical-Psychological Category,” in Lotman, Jurij and Uspenskij, Boris, The Semiotics of Russian Culture, tr. Pike, C. R.. Ann Arbor: 71–123.Google Scholar

Lotman, Yu. M. (2003) Vospitanie dushi. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar

Lowe, N. J. (2007) “Epinikian Eidography,” in Hornblower and Morgan (2007), 167–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, H. (2003) Graceful Errors: Pindar and the Performance of Praise. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacLachlan, B. (2007) “Epinician Swearing,” in Horkos: The Oath in Greek Society, eds. Sommerstein, A. H. and Fletcher, J.. Exeter: 91–101.Google Scholar

Mader, W. (1990) Die Psaumis-Oden Pindars (O.4 und O.5): Ein Kommentar. Innsbruck.Google Scholar

Maehler, H. (1963) Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Maehler, H. (1982) Die Lieder des Bakchylides. Vol. I. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magnelli, E. (1995) “Studi recenti sull’ origine dell’ esametro: un profilo critico,” in Struttura e storia dell’ esametro greco, eds. Fantuzzi, M. and Pretagostini, R., vol. II. Rome: 111–37.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. (1992) [1948] “Myth in Primitive Psychology,” in Magic, Science, and Religion, and other Essays. Long Grove, IL: 93–148.Google Scholar

Mandelstam, O. (1979) The Complete Critical Prose and Letters, ed. Harris, J. G., tr. Harris, J. G. and Link, C.. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Mandel’shtam, O. (2009–2011) Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v trekh tomakh. Moscow.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (1984) “Hesiod, Odysseus, and the Instruction of Princes,” TAPA 114: 29–48.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (1989) The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (1992) “Hesiod’s metanastic poetics,” Ramus 21.1: 11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, R. P. (2003) “The Pipes Are Brawling: Conceptualizing Musical Performance in Athens,” in The Cultures within Ancient Greek Culture: Contact, Conflict, Collaboration, eds. Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L.. Cambridge: 153–80.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (2004) “Hesiod and the Didactic Double,” Synthesis 11: 31–53.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (2015) “Against Ornament: O. M. Freidenberg’s Concept of Metaphor in Ancient and Modern Contexts,” in Kliger and Maslov (2015b): 274–313.Google Scholar

Maslov, B. (2006) “Κλυτομάντιες Δελφοί in Pindar’s Paeans?,” Indoevropeiskoe iazykoznanie i klassicheskaia filologiia 10: 183–7.Google Scholar

Maslov, B. (2009) “The semantics of ἀοιδός and related compounds: Towards a historical poetics of solo performance in Archaic Greece,” CA 28.1: 1–38.Google Scholar

Maslov, B. (2011) “The Metrical Evidence for Pre-Mycenaean Hexameter Epic Reconsidered,” Indoevropeiskoe iazykoznanie i klassicheskaia filologiia 15: 376–89.Google Scholar

Maslov, B. (2012a) “From (theogonic) Mythos to (poetic) Logos: Reading Pindar’s Genealogical Metaphors After Freidenberg,” Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions 12.1: 49–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maslov, B. (2012b) “The Real Life of the Genre of Prooimion,” CP 107.3: 191–205.Google Scholar

Maslov, B. (2012c) “Pindaric Temporality, Goethe’s Augenblick, and the Invariant Plot of Tiutchev’s Lyric,” Comparative Literature 64.4: 356–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maslov, B. (2013a) “Comparative Literature and Revolution, or the Many Arts of (mis)Reading Alexander Veselovsky,” Compar(a)ison: An International Journal of Comparative Literature 2008 (2013) 2: 101–29.Google Scholar

Maslov, B. (2013b) “The Dialect Basis of Choral Lyric and the History of Poetic Languages in Archaic Greece,” SO 87: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maslov, B. (2015) “Metapragmatics, Toposforschung, Marxist Stylistics: Three Extensions of Veselovsky’s Historical Poetics,” in Kliger and Maslov (2015b), 128–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maslov, B. (Forthcoming) “The Genealogy of the Muses: a Internal Reconstruction of Archaic Greek Metapoetics.”Google Scholar

Mastronarde, D. (ed.) (2002) Euripides. Medea. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Matisoff, J. A. (1992) “The Mother of all Morphemes: Augmentatives and Diminutives in a Real and Universal Perspective,” in Papers from the First Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society: 293–349.Google Scholar

Mattéi, J.-F. (ed.) (1990) La naissance de la raison en Grèce. Paris.Google Scholar

Mayrhofer, M. (1986) Indogermanische Grammatik. vol. I, part 2: Lautlehre (segmentale Phonologie des Indogermanischen). Heidelberg.Google Scholar

McCarthy, K. (2010) “First-Person Poetry,” in The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies, eds. Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W.. Oxford: 435–49.Google Scholar

Medvedev, P. N. (1978) [1928] The Formal Method in Literary Scholarship: A Critical Introduction to Sociological Poetics, tr. Wehrle, A. J.. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Meier-Brügger, M. (1992) Griechische Sprachwissenschaft. (2 vols.). Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Meillet, A. (1906) “Comment les mots changent de sens,” L’Année sociologique 1905–1906: 1–38, reprinted in Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, vol. I, 230–71. Paris, 1958.Google Scholar

Meillet, A. (1923) Les origines indo-européennes des mètres grecs. Paris.Google Scholar

Meiser, O. (1904) Mythologische Untersuchungen zu Bacchylides. Munich.Google Scholar

Meister, R. M. E. (1908) “Eideshelfer im griechischen Rechte,” RhM 63: 559–86.Google Scholar

Meletinskii, E. M. (1986) “‘Istoricheskaia poetika’ A. N. Veselovskogo i problema proiskhozhdeniia povestvovatel’noi literatury,” in Istoricheskaia poetika: itogi i perspektivy izucheniia. Moscow: 25–52.Google Scholar

Meltzer, F. (1994) Hot Property: The Stakes and Claims of Literary Originality. Chicago.Google Scholar

Merrill, J. (2012) The Role of Folklore Study in the Rise of Russian Formalist and Czech Structuralist Literary Theory. PhD Thesis. UC Berkeley.Google Scholar

Mezger, F. (1980) Pindars Siegeslieder erklärt von Friedrich Mezger. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Mickey, K. (1981) “Dialect Consciousness and Literary Language: An Example from Ancient Greek,” Transactions of the Philological Society 79: 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miner, E. R. (1990) Comparative Poetics: An Intercultural Essay on Theories of Literature. Princeton.Google Scholar

Minnis, A. J. (1984) Medieval Theories of Authorship: Scholastic Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages. London.Google Scholar

Moisan, C. (1987) Qu’est-ce que l’histoire littéraire? Paris.Google Scholar

Mommsen, A. (1878) Delphika. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Monbrun, P. (2007) Les voix d’Apollon: L’arc, la lyre et les oracles. Rennes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moretti, F. (1998) Atlas of the European Novel, 1800–1900. London.Google Scholar

Moretti, F. (2000) “Conjectures On World Literature,” New Left Review 1: 54–68.Google Scholar

Morgan, C. (2007) “Debating Patronage: The Cases of Argos and Corinth,” in Hornblower and Morgan (2007), 213–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, K. A. (1993) “Pindar the Professional and the Rhetoric of the ΚΩΜΟΣ,” CP 88: 1–15.Google Scholar

Morgan, K. A. (2000) Myth and Philosophy from the Pre-Socratics to Plato. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morpurgo Davies, A. (1998) History of Linguistics, ed. Lepschy, G.. Vol. IV: Nineteenth-Century Linguistics. London.Google Scholar

Morris, I. (1996) “The Strong Principle of Equality and the Archaic Origins of Greek Democracy,” in Dêmokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern, eds. InOber, J. and Hedrick, C.. Princeton: 19–48.Google Scholar

Morris, I. (2000) Archaeology as Cultural History. Oxford and London.Google Scholar

Morris, I. and Powell, B. (eds.) (1997) A New Companion to Homer. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrison, A. D. (2007) Performances and Audiences in Pindar’s Sicilian Victory Odes. London.Google Scholar

Morrison, A. D. (2012) “Performance, Re-Performance, and Pindar’s Audiences,” in Agócs, Carey and Rawles (2012a), 111–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Most, G. W. (1985) The Measures of Praise: Structure and Function in Pindar’s Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Most, G. W. (1986) “Pindar, Nem. 7, 31–36,” Hermes 114.3: 262–71.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (1999) “From Logos to Mythos,” in Buxton (1999), 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moulton, C. (1977) Similes in the Homeric Poems. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Mullen, W. (1982) Choreia: Pindar and Dance. Princeton.Google Scholar

Müller, M. (2002) The Essential Max Müller: On Language, Mythology, and Religion, ed. Stone, J. R.. New York.Google Scholar

Murray, G. (1960) The Rise of the Greek Epic, 4th edn. Oxford.Google Scholar

Murray, P. (1981) “Poetic Inspiration in Early Greece,” JHS 101: 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagy, G. (1974) Comparative Studies in Greek and Indic Meter. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagy, G. (1979a) “On the Origins of Greek Hexameter,” in Festschrift Oswald Szemerényi, ed. Brogyanyi, B.. Amsterdam: 611–31.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1979b) The Best of the Achaeans. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1985) “Theognis and Megara: A Poet’s Vision of His City,” in Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis, eds. Figueira, Th. J. and Nagy, G.. Baltimore: 22–81.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1986) “Pindar’s Olympian 1 and the Aetiology of the Olympic Games,” TAPA 116: 71–88.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1990a) “Ancient Greek Poetry, Prophecy, and the Concepts of Theory,” in Poetry and Prophecy: The Beginnings of a Literary Tradition, ed. Kugel, J. L.. Ithaca: 56–64.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1990b) Pindar’s Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagy, G. (1994) “Genre and Occasion,” Mètis 5: 11–25.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1995) “Metrical Convergences and Divergences in Early Greek Poetry and Song,” in Struttura e storia dell’ esametro greco, eds. Fantuzzi, M. and Pretagostini, R., vol. II. Rome: 63–110.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (2002) Plato’s Rhapsody and Homer’s Music: The Poetics of the Panathenaic Festival in Classical Athens. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (2010) Homer the Preclassic. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Nash, L. L. (1990) [1976] The Aggelia in Pindar. New York.Google Scholar

Neer, R. T. (2001) “Framing the Gift: the Politics of the Siphnian Treasury at Delphi,” CA 20.2: 273–344.Google Scholar

Neer, R. T. and Kurke, L. (2014) “Pindar Fr. 75 SM and the Politics of Athenian Space,” GRBS 54.4: 527–79.Google Scholar

Nestle, W. (1940) Vom Mythos zum Logos: Die Selbstentfaltung des griechischen Denkens von Homer bis auf die Sophistik und Sokrates. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Neumann-Hartmann, A. (2005) “Wenn Pindar ‘Wir’ sagt: Überlegungen zur 1. Person plural bei Pindar,” Aevum antiquum N. S. 5: 145–62.Google Scholar

Neumann-Hartmann, A. (2009) Epinikien und ihr Aufführungsrahmen. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Nicholson, N. (2000) “Pederastic Poets and Adult Patrons in Late Archaic Lyric,” Classical World 93: 235–59.Google Scholar

Nicholson, N. (2005) Aristocracy and Athletics in Archaic and Classical Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. (2000) [1872] The Birth of Tragedy, tr. Smith, D.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nightingale, A. (1995) Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nikitina, T. and Maslov, B. (2013) “Redefining constructio praegnans: On the Variation between Allative and Locative Expressions in Ancient Greek,” Journal of Greek Linguistics 13: 103–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niles, J. D. (1999) Homo Narrans: The Poetics and Anthropology of Oral Literature. Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nisetich, F. J. (1975) “Olympian 1.8–11: An Epinician Metaphor,” HSCP 79: 55–68.Google Scholar

Nisetich, F. J. (1977) “Convention and Occasion in ‘Isthmian’ 2,” California Studies in Classical Antiquity 10: 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norden, E. (1913) Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur Formen-Geschichte religiöser Rede. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Norwood, G. (1945) Pindar. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nöthiger, M. (1971) Die Sprache des Stesichorus und des Ibycus. Zurich.Google Scholar

Nünlist, R. (1998) Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Gorman, E. (2002) “Archaism and Historicism in Horace’s Odes,” in Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography, eds. Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D.. Leiden: 81–101.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (1998) Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ong, W. (1991) [1982] Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London.Google Scholar

Page, D. L. (1936) “The Elegiacs in Euripides’ Andromache,” in Greek Poetry and Life: Essays Presented to Gilbert Murray on His Seventieth Birthday, eds. Bailey, C. et al. Oxford: 206–30.Google Scholar

Page, D. L. (1955) Sappho and Alcaeus: Introduction to the Study of Ancient Lesbian Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Palmer, L. R. (1980) The Greek Language. London.Google Scholar

Papanastassiou, G. C. (1994) Compléments au Dictionnaire étymologique du grec ancient de Pierre Chantraine. Thessaloniki.Google Scholar

Paperno, I. (1988) Chernyshevsky and the Age of Realism: A Study in the Semiotics of Behavior. Stanford.Google Scholar

Parry, M. (1971) [1933] “The Traditional Metaphor in Homer,” in The Making of Homeric Verse. Oxford: 365–75.Google Scholar

Past, K. (1996) The Emergence of the English Author. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Patten, G. (2009) Pindar’s Metaphors: A Study in Rhetoric and Meaning. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Pavel, T. (2013) The Lives of the Novel: A History. Princeton.Google Scholar

Pavese, C. (1966) “XPHMATA, XPHMAT’ ANHP ed il motivo della liberalità nella seconda Istmica di Pindaro,” QUCC 2: 103–12.Google Scholar

Pavlou, M. (2010) “Pindar Nemean 5: Real and Poetic Statues,” Phoenix 64.1–2: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paxson, J. J. (1994) The Poetics of Personification. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, M. (2007) Theocritus and the Invention of Fiction. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pellicia, H. (1995) Mind, Body, and Speech in Homer and Pindar. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peponi, A.-E. (2012) Frontiers of Pleasure: Models of Aesthetic Response in Archaic and Classical Greek Thought. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkins, D. (1992) Is Literary History Possible? Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Perlina, N. (2002) Ol’ga Freidenberg’s Works and Days. Bloomington.Google Scholar

Peters, M. (1980) Untersuchungen zur Vertretung der indogermanischen Laryngale im Griechischen. Wien.Google Scholar

Pettersson, A. (2006) “Introduction: Concepts of Literature and Transcultural Literary History,” in Literary History: Toward a Global Perspective, ed. Lindberg-Wada, G., vol. I. Berlin: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. (ed.) (1953) Callimachus. Vol. II: Hymni et epigrammata. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pfeijffer, I. L. (1999a) Three Aeginetan Odes of Pindar: A Commentary on Nemean V, Nemean III & Pythian VIII. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfeijffer, I. L. (1999b) First Person Futures in Pindar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Pfister, F. (2002) Götter- und Heldensagen der Griechen. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Pollard, J. (1965) Seers, Shrines, and Sirens: The Greek Religious Revolution in the Sixth Century B.C. London.Google Scholar

Ponzi, M. (1999) “‘Eines Schattens Traum’: Goethe und Pindar,” in Goethes Rückblick auf die Antike: Beiträge des deutsch-italienischen Kolloquiums Rom 1998, eds. Witte, B. and Ponzi, M.. Berlin: 38–58.Google Scholar

Porter, J. (2007) “Lasus of Hermione, Pindar, and the Riddle of S,” CQ 57.1: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, J. (2010) The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Potebnia, A. (1905) Iz zapisok po teorii slovesnosti. Kharkiv, reprinted in The Hague (1970).Google Scholar

Pötscher, W. (1959) “Das Person-Bereichdenken in der frühgriechischen Periode,” Wiener Studien 72: 5–25.Google Scholar

Power, T. (2000) “The parthenoi of Bacchylides 13,” HSCP 100: 67–81.Google Scholar

Power, T. (2010) The Culture of Kitharôidia. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pratt, L. (1993) Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Prauscello, L. (2012) “Epinician Sounds: Pindar and Musical Innovation,” In Agócs, Carey and Rawles (2012a), 58–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, S. (1985) “Delphi and Divination,” in Greek Religion and Society, eds. Easterling, P. E. and Muir, J. V.. Cambridge: 128–54.Google Scholar

Price, S. (1999) Religions of the Ancient Greeks. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Privitera, G. A. (1982) Le Istmiche. Milan.Google Scholar

Propp, V. Ia. (1984) Theory and History of Folklore, tr. Martin, A. Y. and Martin, R. P.. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Putilov, B. N. (1997) Epicheskoe skazitel’stvo: tipologiia i etnicheskaia spetsifika. Moscow.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1986) Artifices of Eternity: Horace’s Fourth Book of Odes. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Race, W. H. (1980) “Some Digressions and Returns in Greek Authors,” CJ 76.1: 1–8.Google Scholar

Race, W. H. (1987) “Pindaric encomium and Isokrates’ Evagoras,” TAPA 117: 131–55.Google Scholar

Race, W. H. (1989) “Elements of Style in Pindaric Break-Offs,” AJP 110.2: 189–209.Google Scholar

Race, W. H. (2002) “Framing Hyperbata in Pindar’s Odes,” CJ 98.1: 21–33.Google Scholar

Race, W. H. (2004) “Elements of the Plot and the Formal Presentation in Pindar’s Olympian 12,” CJ 99.4: 373–94.Google Scholar

Radlov, V. V. (1990) [1885] Preface from Proben der Volksliteratur der nördlichen türkischen Stämme 5 (St. Petersburg, 1885), tr. Sherman, G. B. and Davis, A. B., Oral tradition 5: 73–90.Google Scholar

Rawles, R. (2012) “Early Epinician: Ibycus and Simonides,” in Agócs, Carey and Rawles (2012a), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Redfield, J. M. (1975) Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector. Chicago.Google Scholar

Reitzenstein, R. (1893) Epigramm und Skolion: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der alexandrinischen Dichtung. Giessen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Revard, S. (2001) Pindar and the Renaissance Hymn-Ode, 1450–1700. Tempe, Ariz.Google Scholar

Revard, S. (2009) Politics, Poetics, and the Pindaric Ode: 1450–1700. Tempe, Ariz.Google Scholar

Risch, E. (1974) Wortbildung der homerischen Sprache, 2nd edn. Berlin.Google Scholar