Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Philosophy of Criminal Attempts , pp. 219 - 225Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Alexander, Larry, ‘Facts, Law, Exculpation, and Inculpation: Comment on Simons’, (2009) 3 Criminal Law and Philosophy 241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry, ‘Inculpatory and Exculpatory Mistakes and the Fact/Law Distinction: An Essay in Memory of Myke Balyes’ (1993) 12 Law and Philosophy 33–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry and Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler, Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry and Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler, Danger: the Ethics of Preemptive Action’ (2012) 9 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 637–667.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry and Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler, ‘Risk and Inchoate Crimes: Retribution or Prevention’ in Sullivan, G. R. and Dennis, Ian (eds.), Seeking Security: Pre-empting the Commission of Criminal Harms (Oxford: Hart, 2012) 103–120.Google Scholar
Anscombe, Elizabeth, ‘Medallist's Address: Action, Intention and “Double Effect”’ (1982) 56 Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, ‘Criminal Attempts and the Role of Resulting Harm under the Code and in the Common Law’ (1988) 19 Rutgers Law Journal 725–772.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, ‘The Criminal Law's Ambivalence about Outcomes’ in Cruft, R., Kramer, M. and Reif, M. (eds.), Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff (Oxford University Press, 2011) 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, Taking the Consequences’ in Shute, S., Gardner, J. and Horder, J. (eds.), Action and Value in Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 1993) 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, ‘The Rationales of Sentencing’ in Sentencing and Criminal Justice (Cambridge University Press, 2010 5th ed.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Lawrence C., ‘Criminal Attempts and the Theory of the Law of Crimes’ (1974) 3 Philosophy and Public Affairs 262.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael, Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency (Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael, ‘Intention and Means-end Reasoning’ (1981) 90 Philosophical Review 2 252–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael, Intention, Plans and Practical Reason (Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael, ‘Shared Agency’ in Mantzavinos, C. (ed.), Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2008) 41–59.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael, Structures of Agency: Essays (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael, ‘Taking Plans Seriously’ (1983) 9 Social Theory and Practice 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael, ‘Two Faces Of Intention’ (1984) 93 Philosophical Review 3 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, Sarah and Overton, Lee (eds.), ‘Introduction’, Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, Sarah, ‘Personal Autonomy’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/personal-autonomy/ (accessed 27 July 2014).Google Scholar
Carr, David, ‘Knowledge in Practice’ (1981) 18 American Philosophical Quarterly 1 53–61.Google Scholar
Chiao, Vincent, ‘Action and Agency in the Criminal Law’ (2009) Legal Theory 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiao, Vincent, ‘Intention and Attempt’ (2010) 4 Criminal Law and Philosophy 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J. J. and Hunt, Adrian, ‘Mens Rea and the General Inchoate Offences: Another New Culpability Framework’ (2014) 63 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 2 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danto, Arthur C., ‘Basic Actions and Basic Concepts’, 32 Review of Metaphysics 3 (1979) 471–485.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald, Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Wayne A., ‘A Causal Theory of Intending’ (1984) 21 American Philosophical Quarterly 1 43–54.Google Scholar
Descombes, Vincent, The Institutions of Meaning: A Defence of Anthropological Holism, trans. Schwartz, S. S. (Harvard University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Bebhinn, ‘Possibility, Impossibility and Extraordinariness in Attempts’ (2010) 23 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 1 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Bebhinn, ‘Sentencing and Consequences a Divergence between Blameworthiness and Liability for Punishment’ (2007) 10 New Criminal Law Review 3 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A., ‘Acting, Trying and Criminal Liability’ in Shute, S., Gardner, J. and Horder, J. (eds.), Action and Value in Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 1993) 75–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A., ‘Attempts and the Problem of the Missing Circumstance’ (1991) 42 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 87–108.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A., ‘Auctions, Lotteries and the Punishment of Attempts’ (1990) 9 Law and Philosophy 1 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A., ‘The Circumstances of an Attempt’ (1991) 50 Cambridge Law Journal 100–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A., ‘Criminalizing Endangerment’ in Duff, R. A. and Green, S. P. (eds.), Defining Crimes: Essays on the Criminal Law's Special Part (Oxford University Press, 2005) Chapter 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A., ‘Desert and Penance’ in Von Hirsch, A., Ashworth, A. and Roberts, J. (eds.), Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy (Oxford: Hart, 1998 2nd ed).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A., ‘Guiding Commitments and Criminal Liability for Attempts’ (2012) 6 Criminal Law and Philosophy 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A., Intention, Agency and Criminal Liability (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A., ‘Intention, Mens Rea and the Law Commission Report’ (1980) Criminal Law Review 147.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A., ‘Risks Culpability and Criminal Liability’ in Sullivan, G. R. and Dennis, Ian (eds.), Seeking Security: Pre-empting the Commission of Criminal Harms (Oxford: Hart, 2012) 121–142.Google Scholar
Engstrom, S. and Whiting, J. (eds.), Aristotle Kant and the Stoics, Rethinking Happiness and Duty (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Enoch, David and Marmor, Andrei, ‘The Case against Moral Luck’ (2007) 26 Law and Philosophy 4 405–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falvey, Kevin, ‘Knowledge in Intention’ (2000) 99 Philosophical Studies 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Lindsay, ‘Time and Space in Criminal Law’ (2010) 13 New Criminal Law Review 2 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John, ‘Intentions and Side-Effects’ in The Collected Essays of John Finnis (Oxford University Press, 2013) II.1.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P., ‘Attempts’ in Rethinking Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2000, republication).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa, ‘The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect’ (1967) Oxford Review 5–15.Google Scholar
Ford, A., Hornsby, J. and Stoutland, F. (eds.), ‘Introduction’, Essays on Anscombe's Intention (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, Stephen P., ‘Are Attempts Like Treason?’ (2011) 14 New Criminal Law Review 173–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John, ‘Crime: In Proportion and in Perspective’ in Ashworth, A. and Wasik, M. (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory (Oxford University Press, 2004 ed.) 31–52.Google Scholar
Gardner, John, ‘Moore on Complicity and Causality’ (2008) 156 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 432–443.Google Scholar
Gardner, John, ‘The Wrongness of Rape’ in Offences and Defences: Selected Essays on the Philosophy of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2007) Chapter 7 (co-authored with Stephen Shute and reprinted from J Horder (ed.) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, Fourth Series, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginet, Carl, ‘Trying to Act’ in Campbell, J. Keim, O'Rourke, M. and Shier, D. (eds.), Freedom and Determinism: Topics in Contemporary Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004) Chapter 4.Google Scholar
Hacker, Peter, Human Nature: the Categorical Framework (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).Google Scholar
Hall, Jerome, General Principles of Criminal Law (Clark, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd, 2005 reprint).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., ‘On Attempting the Impossible’ in Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 1983) 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., ‘The House of Lords on Attempting the Impossible’ (1981) 1 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (Oxford University Press, 2008 ed.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasnas, John, ‘Once More unto the Breach: The Inherent Liberalism of the Criminal Law and Liability for Attempting the Impossible’ (2002) 54 Hastings Law Journal 1 (Version used available at, http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=349000, accessed on 27 July 2014).Google Scholar
Hodgins, E., Episode: Report on the Accident inside my Skull (New York: Atheneum, 1964) 27.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer, ‘On What's Intentionally Done’ in Shute, S., Gardner, J. and Horder, J. (eds.), Action and Value in Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 1993) 55–74.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind, ‘Intention’ (2000) 46 Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas, ‘Does Criminal Liability Require an Act?’ in The Philosophy of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2010) 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason in Gregor, Mary J. (ed.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1996) 133–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals in Gregor, Mary J. (ed.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1996) 37–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals in Gregor, Mary J. (ed.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1996) 353–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadish, S., ‘Forward: The Criminal Law and the Luck of the Draw’ (1994) 84 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 4 679–702.Google Scholar
Knobe, Joshua, ‘Intentional Action in Folk Psychology: An Experimental Investigation’ (2003) 16 Philosophical Psychology 2 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Law Commission, ‘Attempt, and Impossibility in Relation to Attempt, Conspiracy and Incitement’ (1980) Law Com No 102.Google Scholar
Levy, Ken, ‘The Solution to the Problem of Outcome Luck: Why Harm is Just as Punishable as the Wrongful Action that Causes it’, 24 Law and Philosophy 3 (2005) 263–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (trans.), The Hellenistic Philosophers, Volume 1 (Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Lorini, Emiliano and Herzig, Andreas, ‘A Logic of Intention and Attempt’ (2008) 163 Synthese 45–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorini, Emiliano, Herzig, Andreas and Castelfranchi, C., ‘Introducing Attempt in a Modal Logic of Intentional Action’ (2006) Logics in Artificial Intelligence 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumer, Christoph, ‘The Volitive and the Executive Function of Intentions’ (2013) 166 Philosophical Studies 511–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, Dempsey Michelle and Herring, Jonathan, ‘Why Sexual Penetration Requires Justification’ (2007) 27 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 3 467–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Hugh J., ‘Trying, Paralysis and Volition’ (1975) 28 The Review of Metaphysics 3 423–442.Google Scholar
McCann, Hugh J., ‘Volition and Basic Action’ (1974) 83 Philosophical Review 4 451–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St Robilliard, John, ‘“Intention and Recklessness Again” – a Response’ (1982) Legal Studies 198–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred R., ‘Crimes of Negligence: Attempting and Succeeding’ (2012) 6 Criminal Law and Philosophy 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred R., ‘Is there a Place for Intention in an Analysis of Intentional Action?’ (1999) 27 Philosophia 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred R., ‘Mental Action; A Case Study’ in O'Brien, Lucy and Soteriou, Matthew (eds.), Mental Actions (Oxford University Press, 2009) 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred R., ‘Motivation: Essentially Motivation-Constituting Attitudes’ (1995) 104 Philosophical Review 387–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melissaris, Emmanuel, ‘The Concept of Appropriation and the Offence of Theft’ (2007) 70 Modern Law Review 4 581–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modal Penal Code §5.01 (1) (c) (1985).Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S., Act and Crime: The Philosophy of Action and its Implications for Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2010 Reprint ed.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael S., Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael S., ‘The Independent Moral Significance of Wrongdoing’ (1994) 5 Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 237–282.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, ‘Moral Luck’ in Mortal Questions (Cambridge University Press, 1979) 24–38.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Lucy, ‘On Knowing One's Own Actions’, in Roessler, J. and Eilan, N. (eds.) Agency and Self-Awareness (Oxford University Press, 2003) 358–382.Google Scholar
O'Shaughnessy, B., ‘Trying (as the Mental Pineal Gland)’ (1973) 70 Journal of Philosophy 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, Michael, ‘Double Effect, Triple Effect and the Trolley Problem: Squaring the Circle in Looping Cases’ (2008) 20 Utilitas 1 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, Michael S. and Patterson, Dennis, Minds, Brains and Law: the Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience (Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Sarah, ‘How We Know What We Intend’ (2012) 161 Philosophical Studies 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul, ‘Should the Criminal Law Abandon the Actus Reus/Mens Rea Distinction?’ in Shute, S., Gardner, J. and Horder, J. (eds.), Action and Value in Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 1993) 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica, Law and Authority under the Guise of the Good (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar
Scanlon, Tom, Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame (Harvard: Belknap Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheer, Richard K., ‘What I Will Do and What I Intend to Do’ (1996) 71 Philosophy 531–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J., ‘Harm and Punishment: A Critique of Emphasis on the Results of Conduct in the Criminal Law’ (1974) 122 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 6 1497–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John, ‘The Intentionality of Intention and Action’ (1980) Cognitive Science 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shachar, Yoram, ‘The Fortuitous Gap in Law and Morality’ (1987) 6 Criminal Justice Ethics 2 12–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simester, A. P., ‘Moral Certainty and the Boundaries of Intention’ (1996) 16 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 3 445–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simester, A. P., Spencer, J. R., Sullivan, G. R. and Virgo, G. J., Simester and Sullivan's Criminal Law: Theory and Doctrine (Oxford: Hart, 2013).Google Scholar
Smith, J. C., ‘Attempts, Impossibility and the Test of Rational Motivation’ in Gower, L. C. B. (ed.), Auckland Law School Centenary Lectures (Auckland: Legal Research Foundation, 1983) 25–44.Google Scholar
Teichman, Roger, The Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe (Oxford University Press, 2008) 2.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Michael, Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, ‘Individuating Actions’ (1971) 68 Journal of Philosophy 21 774–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, ‘The Trolley Problem’ (1985) Yale Law Journal 1395–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Michael, ‘Intention in Criminal Law’ (1992) 5 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 2 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, David, The Possibility of Practical Reason (Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hirsch, Andrew, ‘Proportionate Sentences: A Desert Perspective’ in Von Hirsch, A. and Ashworth, A. (eds.), Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy (Oxford: Hart, 1998).Google Scholar
White, A. R., ‘Attempting the Impossible’ in Misleading Cases (Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Wiland, Eric, ‘Intentional Action and “in Order to”’ (2007) 27 Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 1 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B., ‘Moral Luck’ in Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980 (Cambridge University Press, 1981) 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Glanville, ‘The Lords and Impossible Attempts, or Quis Custodiet Ipso Custodes?’ (1986) 45 Cambridge Law Journal 33–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, George, The Intentionality of Human Action, Stanford Series in Philosophy (Stanford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Wilson, George, ‘Acts, Intentions and the Objects of Intentions’ in The Intentionality of Human Action (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958).Google Scholar
Yaffe, Gideon, ‘In Defense of Criminal Possession’, Criminal Law and Philosophy (Published online, 20 June 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar