Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- Preface
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction
- PART I
- 1 Philosophy and its history
- 2 The relationship of philosophy to its past
- 3 The historiography of philosophy: four genres
- 4 Why do we study the history of philosophy?
- 5 Five parables
- 6 Seven thinkers and how they grew: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz; Locke, Berkeley, Hume; Kant
- 7 ‘Interesting questions’ in the history of philosophy and elsewhere
- 8 The Divine Corporation and the history of ethics
- 9 The idea of negative liberty: philosophical and historical perspectives
- PART II
- Index
7 - ‘Interesting questions’ in the history of philosophy and elsewhere
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- Preface
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction
- PART I
- 1 Philosophy and its history
- 2 The relationship of philosophy to its past
- 3 The historiography of philosophy: four genres
- 4 Why do we study the history of philosophy?
- 5 Five parables
- 6 Seven thinkers and how they grew: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz; Locke, Berkeley, Hume; Kant
- 7 ‘Interesting questions’ in the history of philosophy and elsewhere
- 8 The Divine Corporation and the history of ethics
- 9 The idea of negative liberty: philosophical and historical perspectives
- PART II
- Index
Summary
Die Einzelwissenschaften wissen oft
gar nicht, durch welche Faeden sie
von den Gedanken der grossen Philosophen
abhaengen.
Jacob BurckhardtIntroduction: a glance at the history of science
It was a philosophical system that provoked one of the most powerful attacks on historical thinking to date, or at least the overemphasis on it. Friedrich Nietzsche's early essay on The Use and Abuse of History (1873–4) scorned the predominance of history in nineteenth-century German culture, as an unmistakable sign of decadence for which above all one man was responsible – Hegel, who identified reason in everything historical and for whom eventually the highest and final stage of the world process came together in his own Berlin existence. Nietzsche's attack continues to be illuminating even if we remove it from its original context. While dealing with modern science and scholarship, large parts of his essay can also be read as addressing the use and abuse of the history of science, a field in which the illusion of scientific progress and the aberration of historical thinking merge:
The progress of science has been amazingly rapid in the last decade; but consider the savants, those exhausted hens. They are certainly not ‘harmonious’ natures; they can merely cackle more than before, because they lay eggs oftener; but the eggs are always smaller though the books are bigger.
(Nietzsche 1957:46)The history of science, with its more than occasional output of very big books, has not enjoyed a particularly good reputation among scientists.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Philosophy in HistoryEssays in the Historiography of Philosophy, pp. 141 - 172Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1984
- 3
- Cited by