Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T06:24:14.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Data protection and abridged applications for marketing authorisations in the pharmaceutical industry

from Part II - European drug regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2009

Richard Goldberg
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Julian Lonbay
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

Introduction: research data in the pharmaceutical sector

Know-how is important to all businesses but particularly to the pharmaceutical industry. Industrial know-how has been described as ‘substantial technological information relating to the whole or a part of a manufacturing process or a product, or to the development thereof, which is not in the public domain…’. is implicit in the description that the information has value.

Traditionally, patents have been the main method by which the pharmaceutical industry has been able to protect the fruits of its research and the industry has devoted a lot of effort, both in the United States and in Western Europe, to successful lobbying for patent term restoration. This was seen as necessary due to the delay in being able to exploit the products derived from research as a consequence of the need for national marketing authorisations. Within the European Community, the need for marketing authorisations was harmonised in 1965 and the time taken to obtain authorisations, when added on to the time taken to develop the product in the first place and generate the requisite data relating to efficacy and safety, often left companies with insufficient time to make adequate profits before the patent expired. Such profits are required not only to recoup the cost of investment in the product in question but also to cover the significant amount of unsuccessful product development that is a fact of life for all research-based companies. In general, the industry's case for protection was accepted as being a strong one and in the European Community there came into being the principle of Supplementary Protection Certificates.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×