Book contents
- Patent Assertion Entities and Competition Policy
- Patent Assertion Entities and Competition Policy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Missing the Forest for the Trolls
- 3 Empirical Evidence on the Behavior and Impact of Patent Trolls
- 4 Assertion of Standard Essential Patents by Non-Practicing Entities
- 5 Patent Privateering
- 6 Regulating Patent Assertions
- 7 Patent Assertion Entities in Europe
- 8 Treatment of Patent Assertion Entities under Korean Antitrust Law
- 9 Patent Assertion Entities Issues in China
- 10 Patent Assertion Entities and Competition Law in Japan
- 11 Patent Assertion Entities in Merger Review in Taiwan
- Index
- References
5 - Patent Privateering
The Rise of Hybrid Patent Assertion Entities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2017
- Patent Assertion Entities and Competition Policy
- Patent Assertion Entities and Competition Policy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Missing the Forest for the Trolls
- 3 Empirical Evidence on the Behavior and Impact of Patent Trolls
- 4 Assertion of Standard Essential Patents by Non-Practicing Entities
- 5 Patent Privateering
- 6 Regulating Patent Assertions
- 7 Patent Assertion Entities in Europe
- 8 Treatment of Patent Assertion Entities under Korean Antitrust Law
- 9 Patent Assertion Entities Issues in China
- 10 Patent Assertion Entities and Competition Law in Japan
- 11 Patent Assertion Entities in Merger Review in Taiwan
- Index
- References
Summary
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Patent Assertion Entities and Competition Policy , pp. 72 - 84Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
Cases and Statutes
Cargill, Inc. v. Beaver Coal & Oil Co., 424 Mass. 356, 360 (Mass. 1997).
Farris v. Glen Alden Corporation, 143 A.2d 25 (Pa. 1958).
Holmes v. Lerner, 88 Cal. Rptr. 2D 130 (1999).
26 I.R.C. §§ 368(a)(1)(A) (merger), (B) (stock acquisition), and (C) (asset acquisition).
- 2
- Cited by