Adamietz, J. (1984) “Zu Ovids Dido-Brief,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 10: 121–34.Google Scholar

Allan, W. (2000) The Andromache and Euripidean Tragedy. Oxford.

Altman, J. G. (1983) Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form. Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. N. (1896) On the Sources of Ovid's Heroides I, III, VII, X, XII. Berlin.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1986) “The Theory and Practice of Poetic Arrangement from Vergil to Ovid,” in Poems in Their Place: The Intertextuality and Order of Poetic Collections, ed. Fraistat, N.. Chapel Hill and London: 44–65.Google Scholar

Arena, A. (1995) “Ovidio e l'Ideologia Augustea,” Latomus 54: 822–41.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1955) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Baca, A. R. (1971) “Ovid's Epistle from Sappho to Phaon (Heroides 15),” Transactions of the American Philological Association 102: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1992) P. Ovidii Nasonis Epistulae Heroidum 1–3. Florence.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1993a) “Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion and Ovid's Heroides,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 333–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1993b) “Insegnare ad Augusto: Orazio, Epistole 2, 1 e Ovidio, Tristia II,” Materiali e Discussioni 31: 149–84.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1994) Review of Friedrich Spoth, Ovids Heroides als Elegien, Atene e Roma 39: 111–12.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1995) Review of Cornelia Hintermeier, Die Briefpaare in Ovids Heroides: Tradition und Innovation, Journal of Roman Studies 85: 325–7.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1997a) The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1997b) “Endgames: Ovid's Metamorphoses 15 and Fasti 6,” in Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D.. Princeton: 181–208.Google Scholar

Barreca, R. (1993) “Writing as Voodoo: Sorcery, Hysteria, and Art,” in Death and Representation, eds. Goodwin, S. W. and Bronfen, E.. Baltimore and London: 174–91.Google Scholar

Barreno, M. I., Horta, M. T., and Velho da Costa, M. (1975) The Three Marias: New Portuguese Letters, trans. Lane, H. R.. New York.Google Scholar

Barrett, W. S. (1964) Euripides: Hippolytus. Oxford.

Barsby, J. (1978) Ovid (Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics No. 12). Oxford.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1978) A Lover's Discourse: Fragments, trans. Howard, R.. New York.Google Scholar

Belfiore, E. (1980–1) “Ovid's Encomium of Helen,” Classical Journal 76: 136–48.Google Scholar

Bessone, F. (1997) P. Ovidii Nasonis: Heroidum Epistula XII: Medea Iasoni. Florence.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (1992) Il Ritratto dell'amante. Turin.Google Scholar

Beye, C. R. (1969) “Jason as Love-hero in Apollonios' Argonautika,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 10: 31–55.Google Scholar

Birt, T. (1877) “Animadversiones ad Ovidi heroidum epistulas,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 32: 386–432.Google Scholar

Birt, T. (1882) Das antike Buchwesen, repr. 1974. Berlin.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1973) The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bolton, M. C. (1997) “In Defence of Heroides 9,” Mnemosyne 50: 424–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bömer, F. (1976, 1977, and 1980) P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphosen: Kommentar (Bücher vi–vii, viii–ix, and x–xi). Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Bond, G. W. (1963) Euripides: Hypsipyle. Oxford.

Bonner, S. F. (1949) Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Liverpool.Google Scholar

Bopp, H. (1966) “Inscia capta puella: Akontius und Kydippe bei Kallimachos und bei Ovid.” Dissertation, Westfalia.

Boym, S. (1991) Death in Quotation Marks: Cultural Myths of the Modern Poet. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, E. M. (1969) “Ovid Heroides V: Reality and Illusion,” Classical Journal 64: 158–62.Google Scholar

Brescia, G. (1996) “Laodamia ‘ammaestra’ Protesilao (Ov. Her. 13): una lezione di viltà,” Aufidus 29: 27–70.Google Scholar

Bronfen, E. (1992) Over Her Dead Body: Death, Femininity and the Aesthetic. New York and London.Google Scholar

Brownlee, M. S. (1990). The Severed Word: Ovid's Heroides and the Novela Sentimental. Princeton.CrossRef

Brownstein, R. M. (1982) Becoming a Heroine: Reading About Women in Novels. New York.Google Scholar

Burmann, P. (1727) Publii Ovidii Nasonis Opera Omnia, vol. i. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.”New York.Google Scholar

Cantarella, R. (1964) Euripide: I Cretesi. Milan.

Carson, A. (1986) Eros the Bittersweet: An Essay. Princeton.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (1992) “Enone, Apollo pastore e l'amore immedicabile: giochi ovidiani su di un topos elegiaco,” Materiali e Discussioni 28: 85–100.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (1995a) Heroidum Epistula IX: Deianira Herculi. Florence.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (1995b) “Strategies of Tension (Ovid, Heroides 4),” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 41: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. (1995c) “Tragic Irony in Ovid, Heroides 9 and 11,” Classical Quarterly 45: 505–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. (1997a) “The Cambridge Heroides,” Classical Journal 92: 305–14.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (1997b) “Quaerenti plura legendum: On the Necessity of ‘Reading More’ in Ovid's Exile Poetry,” Ramus 26.1: 80–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. (1998a) “Ovidio e la preconoscenza della critica: qualche generalizzazione a partire da Heroides 14,” Philologus 142: 94–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. (1998b) “Ovid's Canace and Euripides' Aeolus: Two Notes on Heroides 11,” Mnemosyne 51: 700–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castle, T. (1982) Clarissa's Ciphers: Meaning and Disruption in Richardson's Clarissa. Ithaca and London.

Chelte, J. S. (1994) “Philomela's Tapestry: Empowering Voice through Text, Texture, and Silence.” Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Citroni, M. (1995) Poesia e lettori in Roma antica: forma della communicazione letteraria. Rome and Bari.Google Scholar

Clare, R. J. (1995) “Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius: Allusion and Exemplarity,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 42: 60–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clauss, J. J., and Johnston, S. I. (eds.) (1997) Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy, and Art. Princeton.Google Scholar

Coffey, M. and Mayer, R. (1990) Seneca: Phaedra. Cambridge.

Comparetti, D. (1876) Sull'autenticità della epistola ovidiana di Saffo a Faone. Florence.Google Scholar

Conacher, D. J. (1967) Euripidean Drama: Myth, Theme and Structure. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, P. J. (1974) “His Dupes and Accomplices: A Study of Ovid the Illusionist in the Amores,” Ramus 3: 18–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conte, G. B.(1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Vergil and Other Latin Poets, trans. Segal, C.. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1996) The Hidden Author: An Interpretation of Petronius' Satyricon, trans. E. Fantham. (Sather Lectures vol. 60). Berkeley.

Courtney, E. (1965) “Ovidian and Non-Ovidian Heroides,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 12: 63–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courtney, E. (1990) “Ovid and an Epigram of Philodemus,” Liverpool Classical Monthly117–18.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1993) The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1998) “Echtheitskritik: Ovidian and Non-Ovidian Heroides Again,” Classical Journal 93: 157–66.Google Scholar

Croiset, M. (1965) Eschyle: Études sur l'Invention Dramatique dans son Théâtre. Paris.Google Scholar

Cucchiarelli, A. (1995) “Ma il giudice delle dee non era un pastore?: Reticenze e arte retorica di Paride (Ov. Her. 16),” Materiali e Discussioni 34: 135–52.Google Scholar

Culler, J. (1975) Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Cunningham, M. P. (1949) “The Novelty of Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Philology 44: 100–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curley, D. E. (1999) “Metatheater: Heroines and Ephebes in Ovid's Metamorphoses.” Dissertation, University of Washington.

Damsté, P. H. (1905) “Ad Ovidii Heroides,” Mnemosyne 33: 1–56.Google Scholar

Davis, P. J. (1995) “Rewriting Euripides: Ovid, Heroides 4,” Scholia 4: 41–55.Google Scholar

Dean, N. (1967) “Chaucer's Complaint, A Genre Descended from the Heroides,” Comp.Lit. 19: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jean, J. (1989) Fictions of Sappho, 1546–1937. Chicago.Google Scholar

D'Elia, S. (1959) Ovidio. Naples.Google Scholar

Della Corte, F. (1969) “Perfidus hospes,” in Hommages à Marcel Renard, ed. J. Bibauw. Brussels: Collection Latomus: 312–21 (= Opusculaiv. Genoa: 29–38).

Della Corte, F. (1970) “I Miti delle Heroides,” in Scripti in honorem Marii Untersteiner. Genoa: 157–69 (= Opusculaiv. Genoa: 39–51).

Desmond, M. (1993) “When Dido Reads Vergil: Gender and Intertextuality in Ovid's Heroides 7,” Helios 20: 56–68.Google Scholar

Vito, A. F. (1994) “The Essential Seriousness of Heroides 4,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 137: 312–30.Google Scholar

Vries, S. G. (1885) Epistula Sapphus ad Phaonem. Leiden.Google Scholar

Diggle, J. (1967) “Notes on the Text of Ovid, Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 17: 136–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Lorenzo, E., Carrano, A., and Viscido, D. (1992) Heroides Epistola XIII (Laodamia a Protesilao). Salerno.Google Scholar

Diotti, U. (1966) “Il ‘Teseo’ di Sofocle,” Dioniso 40: 43–62.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1967) “Die dichterische Absicht Ovids in den Epistulae Heroidum,” Antike und Abendland 13: 41–55.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1968) Der heroische Brief: Bestandaufnahme, Geschichte, Kritik einer humanistisch-barocken Literaturgattung. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1972) Epistulae Heroidum. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1975) P. Ovidius Naso: Der Brief der Sappho an Phaon (Zetemata 58). Munich.

Duchêne, R. (1998) “La Lettre: genre masculin et pratique féminine,” in L'Épistolaire, un genre féminin? ed. Planté, C.. Paris: 27–50.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (1989) “On the Way from Colchis to Corinth: Medea in Book 4 of the ‘Argonautica’,” Hermes 117: 455–70.Google Scholar

Easterling, P. E. (1981) “The End of the Trachiniae,” Illinois Classical Studies 6: 56–74.Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1992) Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Eggerding, F. (1908) “De Heroidum Oviduanarum Epistulis Quae Vocantur Commentationes: Agitur Imprimis de Didone, Phaedra, Penelopa.” Dissertation, Frederick Halensis Academy.

Ehwald, R. (1900) “Exegetischer Kommentar zur XIV Heroide Ovids.” Programm des Herzoglichen Gymnasium Ernestinum zu Gotha. Gotha.

Eisner, R. (1977) “Ariadne in Art, Prehistory to 400 B.C.,” Rivista di Studi Classici 25: 165–81.Google Scholar

Eitrem, S. (1941) “La magie comme motif Littéraire chez les Grecs et les Romains,” Symbolae Osloenses 21: 39–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, R. E. (1996) Roman Literary Culture from Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Faraone, C. A., and Obbink, D. (eds.) (1991) Magika Hiera: Ancient Greek Magic and Religion. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Faraone, C. A., and Obbink, D. (1999) Ancient Greek Love Magic. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York and Oxford.

Farrell, J. (1998) “Reading and Writing the Heroides,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 94: 307–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1992) “Si licet et fas est: Ovid's Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech under the Principate,” in Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. Powell, A.. London: 1–25.Google Scholar

Fetterley, J. (1978) The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Fiction. Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar

Fischer, U. (1969). “Ignotum hoc aliis ille novavit opus: Beobachtungen zur Darstellungskunst Ovids in den Heroides unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Briefpaare her. 16 und 17 (Paris und Helena) und her. 20 und 21 (Acontius und Cydippe).” Dissertation, Augsburg.

Fish, J. (2004) “Physician, Heal Thyself: The Intertextuality of Ovid's Exile Poetry and the Remedia Amoris,” Latomus 63.4: 864–72.Google Scholar

Flaherty, S. M. (1994) “The Rhetoric of Female Self-Destruction: A Study in Homer, Euripides, and Ovid.” Dissertation, Yale University.

Flaubert, G. (1957) Madame Bovary: moeurs de province. Paris.Google Scholar

Foley, H. (2001) Female Acts in Greek Tragedy. Princeton.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1945) Ovid: A Poet between Two Worlds (Sather Lectures vol. 18). Berkeley.Google Scholar

Frassinetti, P. (1974) “La Protesilaudamia di Levio,” in Poesia latina in frammenti: Miscellanea Filologica. Genoa: 315–26.Google Scholar

Frécaut, J.-M. (1972) L'Esprit et l'humour chez Ovide. Grenoble.Google Scholar

Fredrick, D. (1997) “Reading Broken Skin: Violence in Roman Elegy,” in Roman Sexualities, eds. Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B.. Princeton: 172–96.Google Scholar

Fulkerson, L. (2002a) “(Un)Sympathetic Magic: A Study of Heroides 13,” American Journal of Philology 123: 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fulkerson, L. (2002b) “Writing Yourself to Death: Strategies of (Mis)reading in Heroides 2,” Materiali e Discussioni 48: 145–65.Google Scholar

Fulkerson, L. (2003) “Chain(ed) Mail: Hypermestra and the Dual Readership of Heroides 14,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 133: 123–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fulkerson, L. (2004) “Omnia Vincit Amor: Why the Remedia Fail,” Classical Quarterly 54: 211–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuss, D. (1989) Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature, and Difference. New York.Google Scholar

Fyler, J. M. (1971) “Omnia Vincit Amor: Incongruity and the Limitations of Structure in Ovid's Elegiac Poetry,” Classical Journal 66: 196–203.Google Scholar

Gager, J. G. (1992) Curse Tablets and Binding Spells from the Ancient World. Oxford.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1972) The Herakles Theme: The Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. Totowa, N.J.Google Scholar

Gamel, M. -K. (1998) “Reading as a Man: Performance and Gender in Roman Elegy,” Helios 25: 79–95.Google Scholar

Gibert, J. C. (1997) “Euripides' Hippolytus Plays: Which Came First?” Classical Quarterly 47: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, B. (1999) “Ovid on Reading: Reading Ovid. Reception in Ovid Tristia II,” Journal of Roman Studies 89: 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilula, D. (1981) “A Consideration of Phaedra's EYKΛEIA,” Sileno 7: 121–33.Google Scholar

Giomini, R. (1993) “Ancora sulla struttura retorica nelle Heroides Ovidiane: l'Epistola di Fedra a Ippolito,” in Cultura e Lingue Classiche 3, ed. Biagio, A.. Rome.Google Scholar

Gold, B. K. (1993) “‘But Ariadne was Never There in the First Place’: Finding the Female in Roman Poetry,” in Feminist Theory and the Classics, eds. Rabinowitz, N. S. and Richlin, A.. New York and London: 75–101.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1965) “Amatoria Critica,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 9: 1–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1974) Review of Dörrie's text of the Heroides, Gnomon 46: 475–84.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1977) Heroides and Amores. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Gordon, P. (1997) “The Lover's Voice in Heroides 15: Or, Why is Sappho a Man?” in Roman Sexualities, eds. Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B.. Princeton: 274–94.Google Scholar

Goud, T. E. and Yardley, J. C. (1988) “Dido's Burning Effigy: Aeneid 4.508,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 131: 386–8.Google Scholar

Grantz, F. H. (1955) “Studien zur Darstellungskunst Ovids in den Heroides.” Dissertation, Kiel.

Grimal, P. (1963) “L'Originalité de Sénèque dans la Tragédie de Phèdre,” Revue des Études Latines 41: 297–314.Google Scholar

Guilleragues, G. J. (1972) Lettres Portugaises, ed. Deloffre, F. and Rougeot, J.. Geneva.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Hall, J. B. (1990) “Conjectures in Ovid's Heroides,” Illinois Classical Studies 15: 263–92.Google Scholar

Hall, J. B. (1999) “Ovid” (Review of Galasso and Casali). Classical Review 49: 390–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallett, J. P. (1989) “Woman as Same and Other in Classical Roman Elite,” Helios 16: 59–78.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (2002) Ovid's Poetics of Illusion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (1989) Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Harvey, E. D. (1989) “Ventriloquizing Sappho: Ovid, Donne, and the Erotics of the Feminine Voice,” Criticism 31: 115–38.Google Scholar

Heinze, T. (1993) “The Authenticity of Ovid Heroides 12 Reconsidered,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 38: 94–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinze, T. (1997) P. Ovidius Naso: Der XII Heroidenbrief: Medea an Jason mit einer Beilage: Die Fragmente der Tragödie Medea: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar. Leiden.

Hemelrijk, E. (1999) Matrona Docta: Educated Women in the Roman Elite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1986) “Becoming a Heroine: Penelope's Ovid,” Liverpool Classical Monthly 11: 7–10, 114–19.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1991) “Wrapping up the Case: Reading Ovid, Amores 2,7 (+ 8): I,” Materiali e Discussioni 27: 37–88.Google Scholar

Herter, H. (1940) “Theseus und Hippolytus,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 89: 273–92.Google Scholar

Herter, H. (1971) “Phaidra in griechischer und römischer Gestalt,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 14: 44–77.Google Scholar

Hetzner, U. (1963) Andromeda und Tarpeia. Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie, vol. viii. Meisenheim.Google Scholar

Hexter, R. J. (1986) Ovid and Medieval Schooling: Studies in Medieval School Commentaries on Ovid's Ars amatoria, Epistulae ex Ponto, and Epistulae heroidum. Munich.

Hinds, S. (1987a) The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1987b) “Generalising about Ovid,” Ramus 16: 4–31.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1987c) “The Poetess and the Reader: Further Steps Toward Sulpicia,” Hermathena 143: 29–46.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1993) “Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the Life of an Intertextual Heroine,” Materiali e Discussioni 30: 9–47.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hintermeier, C. M. (1993) Die Briefpaare in Ovids Heroides: Tradition und Innovation. Palingensiaxli. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Holzberg, N. (1998) Ovid: Dichter und Werk. Munich.Google Scholar

Housman, A. E. (1897) “Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Review 11: 102–6, 200–4, 238–42, 286–90, 425–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hross, H. (1958) “Die Klagen der verlassenen Heroiden in der lateinischen Dichtung: Untersuchungen der Motivik und zur dichterischen Form.” Dissertation, Munich.

Hubaux, J. (1926) “Ovide et Sappho,” Musée Belge 30: 197–218.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1989) Apollonius of Rhodes: Argonautica Book III. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1993) The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irigaray, L. (1985) This Sex Which is Not One, trans. Porter, C.. Cornell.Google ScholarPubMed

Jacobson, H. (1974) Ovid's Heroides. Princeton.Google Scholar

Jäkel, S. (1973) “The 14th Heroid Letter of Ovid and the Danaid Trilogy of Aeschylus,” Mnemosyne 26: 239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, S. L. (2003) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Jeny, H. (1989) “Troizen as the Setting of Hippolytos Stephanephoros,” American Journal of Philology 110: 400–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, H. F., and Whittle, E. W. (eds.) (1980) Aeschylus: The Suppliants, 3 vols. Denmark.Google Scholar

Johnston, S. I. (1999) Restless Dead: Encounters between the Living and the Dead in Ancient Greece. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Jolivet, J. -C. (2001) Allusion et fiction épistolaire dans les Héroïdes: Recherches sur l'intertextualité ovidienne. Collection de l'École Française de Rome, 289. Paris.

Kauffman, L. S. (1986) Discourses of Desire: Gender, Genre, and Epistolary Fictions. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1984) “The Epistolary Mode and the First of Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 34: 413–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1992) “‘Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference,” in Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. Powell, A.. London: 26–58.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1993) The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (2002) “Epistolarity: the Heroides,” in The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, ed. Hardie, P.. Cambridge: 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1970) “Notes on Ovid: III,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 74: 169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1979) “Two Disputed Passages in the Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 73: 394–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1995) “‘Dear Helen…’: the pithanotate prophasis?” Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 8: 187–207.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1996) Ovid: Heroides XVI–XXI. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Keuls, E. (1974) Water Carriers in Hades: A Study of Catharsis through Toil in Classical Antiquity. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Kirfel, E. A. (1969) Untersuchungen zur Briefform der Heroides Ovids (Noctes Romanae 11). Bern and Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Knox, P. E. (1986) “Ovid's Medea and the Authenticity of Heroides 12,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knox, P. E. (1995) Ovid: Heroides – Select Epistles. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Knox, P. E. (1998) “Ariadne on the Rocks: Influences on Ovid, Her. 10,” in Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, eds. Knox, P. E. and Foss, C.. Stuttgart and Leipzig: 72–84.Google Scholar

Knox, P. E. (2002) “The Heroides: Elegiac Voices,” in Brill's Companion to Ovid, ed. Boyd, B. W.. Leiden: 117–39.Google Scholar

Koltowski, I. (1960) “De Poematis Ovidio Falso Adscriptis,” Eos 50: 177–95.Google Scholar

Labate, M. (1977) “La Canace Ovidiana e L'Eolo di Euripide,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 7: 583–93.Google Scholar

Labate, M. (1984) L'arte di farsi amare: modelli culturali e progetto didascalico nell'elegia ovidiana. Pisa.Google Scholar

Lachmann, K. (1876) “De Ovidii epistulis,” in Kleinere Schriften, 2, repr. Berlin and New York 1974.Google Scholar

Landolfi, L. (2000) Scribentis Imago: Eroine Ovidiane e Lamento Epistolare. Bologna.Google Scholar

Larmour, D. H. J. (1990) “Tragic Contaminatio in Ovid's Metamorphoses: Procne and Medea; Philomela and Iphigeneia (6.424–674); Scylla and Phaedra (8.19–151),” Illinois Classical Studies 15: 131–41.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (1997) “Ovid, Heroides 6.1–2,” Classical Quarterly 91: 605–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindheim, S. H. (2000) “Omnia vincit amor: Or, Why Oenone Should Have Known It Would Never Work Out (Eclogue 10 and Heroides 5),” Materiali e Discussioni 44: 83–101.Google Scholar

Lindheim, S. H. (2003) Mail and Female: Epistolary Narrative and Desire in Ovid's Heroides. Madison, Wisc.

Lipking, L. (1988) Abandoned Women and Poetic Tradition. Chicago and London.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. (1963) Review of Oxyrhynchus Papyri 27, Gnomon 35: 433–55.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (forthcoming). Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome.

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1994) “Vergil's Aeneid: Subversion by Intertextuality,” Greece and Rome 41: 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1998) “Love and Death: Laodamia and Protesilaos in Catullus, Propertius, and Others,” Classical Quarterly 48: 200–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malherbe, A. J. (1988) Ancient Epistolary Theorists (Sources for Biblical Study, 19). Atlanta, Ga.Google Scholar

Maltby, R. (1991) A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymology. Leeds.Google Scholar

March, J. R. (1987) The Creative Poet: Studies on the Treatment of Myths in Greek Poetry, BICS suppl. 49. London.Google Scholar

Maurer, J. (1990) Untersuchungen zur poetischen Technik und den Vorbildern der Ariadne-Epistel Ovids. Frankfurt and Bern.Google Scholar

Mayer, M. (1885) “Der Protesilaos des Euripides,” Hermes 20: 101–43.Google Scholar

McKinley, K. (2001) Reading the Ovidian Heroine: “Metamorphoses” Commentaries 1100–1618. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Means, T. (1929) “A Comparison of the Treatment by Vergil and by Ovid of the Aeneas–Dido Myth,” Classical World 23: 41–4.Google Scholar

Merklin, H. (1968) “Arethusa und Laodamia,” Hermes 96: 461–94.Google Scholar

Merone, E. (1964) Studi sulle Eroidi di Ovidio. Naples.Google Scholar

Milnor, K. L. (2002) “Sulpicia's (Corpo)reality: Elegy, Authorship, and the Body in [Tib.] 3.13,” ClAnt. 21: 259–82.Google Scholar

Miner, E. (1986) “Some Issues for Study of Integrated Collections,” in Poems in Their Place: The Intertextuality and Order of Poetic Collections, ed. Fraistat, N.. Chapel Hill and London: 18–43.Google Scholar

Moi, T. (1985) Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. London and New York.Google Scholar

Monti, R. C. (1981) The Dido Episode and the Aeneid: Roman Social and Political Values in the Epic. Leiden.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. E. (1985) “Imitation and Originality in Ovid: Metamorphoses 1.477 and Heroides 15,” American Journal of Philology 106: 456–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers, K. S. (1994) Ovid's Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor.

Naylor, H. D. (1911) “The Alleged Hyperbaton of Heroides 3.19,” Classical Review 25: 42.Google Scholar

Newlands, C. E. (1997) “The Metamorphosis of Ovid's Medea,” in Clauss and Johnston 1997: 178–210.

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970) A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book 1. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nugent, S. G. (1990) “Tristia 2: Ovid and Augustus,” in Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate, eds. Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M.. Berkeley: 239–57.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J. J. (1993) “Dido as ‘Interpreting Character’ at Aeneid 4.56–66,” Arethusa 26: 99–114.Google Scholar

Oppel, E. (1968) “Ovids Heroides: Studien zur inneren Form und zur Motivation.” Dissertation, Erlangen-Nürnberg.

Ottone, M. D. (2003) “Epic and Elegy in Ovid's Heroides: Paris, Helen, and Homeric Intertext.” Dissertation, Duke University.

Palmer, A. (1898) P. Ovidi Nasonis Heroides (final editing by Purser, L.). Oxford.Google Scholar

Paratore, E. (1953) “Sulla Phaedra di Seneca,” Dioniso 15: 199–234.Google Scholar

Pattoni, M. P. (1991) “Ov. Her. IX 121ss. e le Trachinie di Sofocle,” Aevum Antiquum 4: 115–52.Google Scholar

Pearson, C. S. (1980) “Simile and Imagery in Ovid Heroides 4 and 5,” Illinois Classical Studies 5: 110–29.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. (1985) Callimachus, 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Philippides, K. (1996) “Canace Misunderstood: Ovid's Heroides XI,” Mnemosyne 49: 426–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pichon, R. (1909) “La Magie dans le IVe Chant de l'Énéide,” Revue de Philologie 33: 247–54.Google Scholar

Pratt, L. H. (1993) Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Pucci, P. (1987) Odysseus Polutropos: Intertextual Readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad. Ithaca.

Pulbrook, M. (1977) “The Original Published Form of Ovid's Heroides,” Hermathena 122: 29–45.Google Scholar

Purnelle, G. (1990) Ovide: Epistulae Heroidum. Liège.Google Scholar

Quinn, K. (1982) “The Poet and his Audience in the Augustan Age,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.30: 75–180.Google Scholar

Rabinowitz, P. J. (1986) “Shifting Stands, Shifting Standards: Reading, Interpretation, and Literary Judgment,” Arethusa 19: 115–34.Google Scholar

Rahn, H. (1958) “Ovids elegische Epistel,” Antike und Abendland 7: 105–20.Google Scholar

Reckford, K. (1974) “Phaedra and Pasiphae: The Pull Backward,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 104: 307–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reeson, J. (2001) Ovid: Heroides 11, 13 & 14: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Reeve, M. D. (1973) “Notes on Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 67: 325–38.Google Scholar

Ribbeck, O. (1875/1968) Die römische Tragödie im Zeitalter der Republik. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Rimell, V. (1999) “Epistolary Fictions: Authorial Identity in Heroides 15,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45: 109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, D. H. (1997) “Afterword: Ending and Aftermath, Ancient and Modern,” in Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D.. Princeton: 251–73.Google Scholar

Roisman, H. (1999) Nothing Is As It Seems: The Tragedy of the Implicit in Euripides' Hippolytus. Lanham, Md.

Romilly, J., (1975) Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosati, G. (1985) “Forma elegiaca di un simbolo letterario: la Fedra di Ovidio,” in Atti delle Giornate di Studio su Fedra, ed. Uglione, Renato. Turin: 113–31.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (1988) “Il parto maledetto di Medea (Ovidio, Her. 6,156s.),” Materiali e Discussioni20–1: 305–9.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (1991) “Protesilao, Paride e l'amante elegiaco: un modello Omerico in Ovidio,” Maia 43: 103–14.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (1992) “L'elegia al femminile: le Heroides di Ovidio (e altre heroides),” Materiali e Discussioni 29: 71–94.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (1996) “Sabinus, the Heroides and the Poet-Nightingale. Some Observations on the Authenticity of the Epistula Sapphus,” Classical Quarterly 46: 207–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenmeyer, P. A. (1996) “Love Letters in Callimachus, Ovid and Aristaenetus or the Sad Fate of a Mailorder Bride,” Materiali e Discussioni 36: 9–31.Google Scholar

Rosenmeyer, P. A. (1997) “Ovid's Heroides and Tristia: Voices from Exile,” Ramus 26.1: 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenmeyer, P. A. (2001) Ancient Epistolary Fictions: The Letter in Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Russ, J. (1973) “What Can a Heroine Do? Or Why Women Can't Write,” in Images of Women in Fiction: Feminist Perspectives, ed. Cornillion, S. K.. Green, Bowling, Ohio: 3–20.Google Scholar

Schmidt, E. A. (1967) “Ariadne bei Catull und Ovid,” Gymn. 74: 489–501.Google Scholar

Schmitz-Cronenbröck, W. (1937) “Die Anfänge der Heroiden des Ovid.” Dissertation, Dusseldorf.

Séchan, L. (1953) “La légende de Protésilas,” Bulletin de l'Association G. Budé 12: 3–27.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1965) “The Tragedy of the Hippolytus: The Waters of Ocean and the Untouched Meadow,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology: 70: 117–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, C. (1977) “Sophocles' Trachiniae: Myth, Poetry, and Heroic Values,” Yale Classical Studies 25: 99–158.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1984) “Underreading and Intertextuality: Sappho, Simaetha, and Odysseus in Theocritus' Second Idyll,” Arethusa 17: 201–9.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1986) Language and Desire in Seneca's Phaedra. Princeton.

Sharrock, A. R. (1991) “Womanufacture,” Journal of Roman Studies 81: 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharrock, A. R. (1994a) Seduction and Repetition in Ovid's Ars Amatoria 2. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. R. (1994b) “Ovid and the Politics of Reading,” Materiali e Discussioni 33: 97–122.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (eds.) (2000) Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations. Oxford.Google Scholar

Skinner, M. B. (1997) “Ego Mulier: The Construction of Male Sexuality in Catullus,” in Roman Sexualities, eds. Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B.. Princeton: 129–50.Google Scholar

Slater, N. W. (1990) Reading Petronius. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Smith, R. A. (1994) “Fantasy, Myth, and Love Letters: Text and Tale in Ovid's Heroides,” Arethusa 27: 247–73.Google Scholar

Smith, R. A. (1997) Poetic Allusion and Poetic Embrace in Ovid and Virgil. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1979) Theseus as Son and Stepson: A Tentative Illustration of Greek Mythological Mentality, BICS suppl. 40. London.Google Scholar

Spentzou, E. (2003) Readers and Writers in Ovid's Heroides: Transgressions of Genre and Gender. Oxford.

Spoth, F. (1992) Ovids Heroides als Elegien (Zetemata heft 89). München.

Spoth, F. (1993) “Ovids Ariadne-Brief (Her. 10) und die römische Liebeselegie,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 19: 239–60.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, P. (1987) “Die literarische Form der Epistulae Heroidum Ovids,” Gymn. 94: 128–45.Google Scholar

Stroh, W. (1971) Die römische Liebeselegie als werbende Dichtung. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Stroh, W. (1991) “Heroides ovidianae cur epistulas scribant,” in Ovidio poeta della memoria: Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi Sulmona, 19–21 ottobre 1989, ed. Papponetti, G.. Sulmo.Google Scholar

Svenbro, J. (1993) Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece, trans. Lloyd, J.. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (1981) “The Authenticity of the Letter of Sappho to Phaon (Heroides XV),” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 85: 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tissol, G. (1997) The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Princeton.

Torresin, G. (1998) “Ovids Phaedra in der mythologischen Tradition Ep. Her. 4 – der Brief einer Persona Delirans,” Classica et Mediaevalia 49: 163–235.Google Scholar

Treggiari, S. (1991) Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.

Treu, M. (1953) “Ovid und Sappho,” La Parola del Passato 8: 356–64.Google Scholar

Tschiedel, H. -J. (1969) “Phaedra und Hippolytus: Variationen eines tragischen Konfliktes.” Dissertation, Erlangen-Nürnberg.

Tupet, A. -M. (1970) “Didon Magicienne,” Revue des Études Latines 48: 229–58.Google Scholar

Tupet, A. -M. (1976) La Magie dans la poésie Latine I: des origines à la fin du régne d'Auguste. Paris.Google Scholar

Sickle, J. (1980) “The Book-Roll and Some Conventions of the Poetic Book,” Arethusa 13: 5–42.Google Scholar

Verducci, F. (1985) Ovid's Toyshop of the Heart. Princeton.Google Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. C. (1969) “Notes on Ovid, Heroides 9,” Classical Quarterly 63: 349–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. C. (1976) “Humor and Humanity in Ovid's Heroides,” Arethusa 9: 91–110.Google Scholar

Viarre, S. (1964) “L'image et la pensée dans les Métamorphoses d'Ovide.” Dissertation, Paris.

Viarre, S. (1977) “Le rhétorique et l'imagination dans la IXe Héroide (Déjanire à Hercule),” Helmantica 28: 549–60.Google Scholar

Voigt, E. -M. (1971) Sappho et Alcaea. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Von Albrecht, M. and Zinn, E. (1968) Ovid (Wege der Forschung 92). Darmstadt.

Albrecht, M. (1981) “Ovide et ses lecteurs,” Revue des Études Latines 59: 207–15.Google Scholar

Wilamowitz-Möllendorf, U. (1906) Griechische Tragödie. Berlin.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1987) “Time for Augustus: Ovid, Augustus, and the Fasti,” in Homo Viator: Classical Essays for J. Bramble, eds. Whitby, M.et al. Oxford: 221–30.Google Scholar

Webster, T. B. L. (1966) “The Myth of Ariadne from Homer to Catullus,” Greece and Rome 13: 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webster, T. B. L. (1967) The Tragedies of Euripides. London.Google Scholar

Wecklein, N. (1893) “Studien zu den Hiketiden des Aeschylos,” Munchen Akademie der Wissenschaften Sitzungsberichte der Philosophisch-Philologischen und Historischen Classe 2: 393–450.Google Scholar

West, M. L. (1985) The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wheeler, S. M. (1999) A Discourse of Wonders: Audience and Performance in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Philadelphia.

Wilkinson, L. P. (1955) Ovid Recalled. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Williams, G. D. (1992) “Ovid's Canace: Dramatic Irony in Heroides 11,” Classical Quarterly 42: 201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, G. D. (1994) Banished Voices: Readings in Ovid's Exile Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Williams, G. D. (1996) The Curse of Exile: A Study of Ovid's Ibis. Cambridge.

Williams, G. D. (1997) “Writing in the Mother-Tongue: Hermione and Helen in Heroides 8 (a Tomitian Approach),” Ramus 26: 113–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wills, J. (1996) Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Winkler, J. J. (1985) Auctor and Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius' Golden Ass. Berkeley.

Winkler, J. J. (1990) The Constraints of Desire: The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece. New York.Google Scholar

Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1960) “Hippolytus: A Study in Causation,” in Euripides, Fondation Hardt Entretiens 6. Geneva: 171–91.Google Scholar

Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1961) “The Danaid Trilogy of Aeschylus,” Journal of Hellenistic Studies 81: 141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winsor, E. J. (1963) “A Study in the Sources and Rhetoric of Chaucer's Legend of Good Women and Ovid's Heroides.” Dissertation, Yale University.

Wyke, M. (1994) “Taking the Woman's Part: Engendering Roman Love Elegy,” Ramus 23: 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeitlin, F. (1985) “The Power of Aphrodite: Eros and the Boundaries of the Self in Euripides' Hippolytus,” in New Directions in Euripidean Criticism, ed. Burian, P.. Durham, N.C.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1980) “Horace's Liber Sermonum: The Structure of Ambiguity,” Arethusa 13: 59–78.Google Scholar

Zinn, E. (1960) “Elemente des Humors in augustischer Dichtung,” Gymn. 67: 41–56.Google Scholar

Zoellner, F. (1892) Analecta Ovidiana. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Adamietz, J. (1984) “Zu Ovids Dido-Brief,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 10: 121–34.Google Scholar

Allan, W. (2000) The Andromache and Euripidean Tragedy. Oxford.

Altman, J. G. (1983) Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form. Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. N. (1896) On the Sources of Ovid's Heroides I, III, VII, X, XII. Berlin.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1986) “The Theory and Practice of Poetic Arrangement from Vergil to Ovid,” in Poems in Their Place: The Intertextuality and Order of Poetic Collections, ed. Fraistat, N.. Chapel Hill and London: 44–65.Google Scholar

Arena, A. (1995) “Ovidio e l'Ideologia Augustea,” Latomus 54: 822–41.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1955) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Baca, A. R. (1971) “Ovid's Epistle from Sappho to Phaon (Heroides 15),” Transactions of the American Philological Association 102: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1992) P. Ovidii Nasonis Epistulae Heroidum 1–3. Florence.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1993a) “Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion and Ovid's Heroides,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 333–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1993b) “Insegnare ad Augusto: Orazio, Epistole 2, 1 e Ovidio, Tristia II,” Materiali e Discussioni 31: 149–84.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1994) Review of Friedrich Spoth, Ovids Heroides als Elegien, Atene e Roma 39: 111–12.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1995) Review of Cornelia Hintermeier, Die Briefpaare in Ovids Heroides: Tradition und Innovation, Journal of Roman Studies 85: 325–7.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1997a) The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1997b) “Endgames: Ovid's Metamorphoses 15 and Fasti 6,” in Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D.. Princeton: 181–208.Google Scholar

Barreca, R. (1993) “Writing as Voodoo: Sorcery, Hysteria, and Art,” in Death and Representation, eds. Goodwin, S. W. and Bronfen, E.. Baltimore and London: 174–91.Google Scholar

Barreno, M. I., Horta, M. T., and Velho da Costa, M. (1975) The Three Marias: New Portuguese Letters, trans. Lane, H. R.. New York.Google Scholar

Barrett, W. S. (1964) Euripides: Hippolytus. Oxford.

Barsby, J. (1978) Ovid (Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics No. 12). Oxford.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1978) A Lover's Discourse: Fragments, trans. Howard, R.. New York.Google Scholar

Belfiore, E. (1980–1) “Ovid's Encomium of Helen,” Classical Journal 76: 136–48.Google Scholar

Bessone, F. (1997) P. Ovidii Nasonis: Heroidum Epistula XII: Medea Iasoni. Florence.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (1992) Il Ritratto dell'amante. Turin.Google Scholar

Beye, C. R. (1969) “Jason as Love-hero in Apollonios' Argonautika,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 10: 31–55.Google Scholar

Birt, T. (1877) “Animadversiones ad Ovidi heroidum epistulas,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 32: 386–432.Google Scholar

Birt, T. (1882) Das antike Buchwesen, repr. 1974. Berlin.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1973) The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bolton, M. C. (1997) “In Defence of Heroides 9,” Mnemosyne 50: 424–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bömer, F. (1976, 1977, and 1980) P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphosen: Kommentar (Bücher vi–vii, viii–ix, and x–xi). Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Bond, G. W. (1963) Euripides: Hypsipyle. Oxford.

Bonner, S. F. (1949) Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Liverpool.Google Scholar

Bopp, H. (1966) “Inscia capta puella: Akontius und Kydippe bei Kallimachos und bei Ovid.” Dissertation, Westfalia.

Boym, S. (1991) Death in Quotation Marks: Cultural Myths of the Modern Poet. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, E. M. (1969) “Ovid Heroides V: Reality and Illusion,” Classical Journal 64: 158–62.Google Scholar

Brescia, G. (1996) “Laodamia ‘ammaestra’ Protesilao (Ov. Her. 13): una lezione di viltà,” Aufidus 29: 27–70.Google Scholar

Bronfen, E. (1992) Over Her Dead Body: Death, Femininity and the Aesthetic. New York and London.Google Scholar

Brownlee, M. S. (1990). The Severed Word: Ovid's Heroides and the Novela Sentimental. Princeton.CrossRef

Brownstein, R. M. (1982) Becoming a Heroine: Reading About Women in Novels. New York.Google Scholar

Burmann, P. (1727) Publii Ovidii Nasonis Opera Omnia, vol. i. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.”New York.Google Scholar

Cantarella, R. (1964) Euripide: I Cretesi. Milan.

Carson, A. (1986) Eros the Bittersweet: An Essay. Princeton.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (1992) “Enone, Apollo pastore e l'amore immedicabile: giochi ovidiani su di un topos elegiaco,” Materiali e Discussioni 28: 85–100.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (1995a) Heroidum Epistula IX: Deianira Herculi. Florence.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (1995b) “Strategies of Tension (Ovid, Heroides 4),” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 41: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. (1995c) “Tragic Irony in Ovid, Heroides 9 and 11,” Classical Quarterly 45: 505–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. (1997a) “The Cambridge Heroides,” Classical Journal 92: 305–14.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (1997b) “Quaerenti plura legendum: On the Necessity of ‘Reading More’ in Ovid's Exile Poetry,” Ramus 26.1: 80–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. (1998a) “Ovidio e la preconoscenza della critica: qualche generalizzazione a partire da Heroides 14,” Philologus 142: 94–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. (1998b) “Ovid's Canace and Euripides' Aeolus: Two Notes on Heroides 11,” Mnemosyne 51: 700–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castle, T. (1982) Clarissa's Ciphers: Meaning and Disruption in Richardson's Clarissa. Ithaca and London.

Chelte, J. S. (1994) “Philomela's Tapestry: Empowering Voice through Text, Texture, and Silence.” Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Citroni, M. (1995) Poesia e lettori in Roma antica: forma della communicazione letteraria. Rome and Bari.Google Scholar

Clare, R. J. (1995) “Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius: Allusion and Exemplarity,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 42: 60–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clauss, J. J., and Johnston, S. I. (eds.) (1997) Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy, and Art. Princeton.Google Scholar

Coffey, M. and Mayer, R. (1990) Seneca: Phaedra. Cambridge.

Comparetti, D. (1876) Sull'autenticità della epistola ovidiana di Saffo a Faone. Florence.Google Scholar

Conacher, D. J. (1967) Euripidean Drama: Myth, Theme and Structure. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, P. J. (1974) “His Dupes and Accomplices: A Study of Ovid the Illusionist in the Amores,” Ramus 3: 18–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conte, G. B.(1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Vergil and Other Latin Poets, trans. Segal, C.. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1996) The Hidden Author: An Interpretation of Petronius' Satyricon, trans. E. Fantham. (Sather Lectures vol. 60). Berkeley.

Courtney, E. (1965) “Ovidian and Non-Ovidian Heroides,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 12: 63–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courtney, E. (1990) “Ovid and an Epigram of Philodemus,” Liverpool Classical Monthly117–18.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1993) The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1998) “Echtheitskritik: Ovidian and Non-Ovidian Heroides Again,” Classical Journal 93: 157–66.Google Scholar

Croiset, M. (1965) Eschyle: Études sur l'Invention Dramatique dans son Théâtre. Paris.Google Scholar

Cucchiarelli, A. (1995) “Ma il giudice delle dee non era un pastore?: Reticenze e arte retorica di Paride (Ov. Her. 16),” Materiali e Discussioni 34: 135–52.Google Scholar

Culler, J. (1975) Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Cunningham, M. P. (1949) “The Novelty of Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Philology 44: 100–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curley, D. E. (1999) “Metatheater: Heroines and Ephebes in Ovid's Metamorphoses.” Dissertation, University of Washington.

Damsté, P. H. (1905) “Ad Ovidii Heroides,” Mnemosyne 33: 1–56.Google Scholar

Davis, P. J. (1995) “Rewriting Euripides: Ovid, Heroides 4,” Scholia 4: 41–55.Google Scholar

Dean, N. (1967) “Chaucer's Complaint, A Genre Descended from the Heroides,” Comp.Lit. 19: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jean, J. (1989) Fictions of Sappho, 1546–1937. Chicago.Google Scholar

D'Elia, S. (1959) Ovidio. Naples.Google Scholar

Della Corte, F. (1969) “Perfidus hospes,” in Hommages à Marcel Renard, ed. J. Bibauw. Brussels: Collection Latomus: 312–21 (= Opusculaiv. Genoa: 29–38).

Della Corte, F. (1970) “I Miti delle Heroides,” in Scripti in honorem Marii Untersteiner. Genoa: 157–69 (= Opusculaiv. Genoa: 39–51).

Desmond, M. (1993) “When Dido Reads Vergil: Gender and Intertextuality in Ovid's Heroides 7,” Helios 20: 56–68.Google Scholar

Vito, A. F. (1994) “The Essential Seriousness of Heroides 4,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 137: 312–30.Google Scholar

Vries, S. G. (1885) Epistula Sapphus ad Phaonem. Leiden.Google Scholar

Diggle, J. (1967) “Notes on the Text of Ovid, Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 17: 136–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Lorenzo, E., Carrano, A., and Viscido, D. (1992) Heroides Epistola XIII (Laodamia a Protesilao). Salerno.Google Scholar

Diotti, U. (1966) “Il ‘Teseo’ di Sofocle,” Dioniso 40: 43–62.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1967) “Die dichterische Absicht Ovids in den Epistulae Heroidum,” Antike und Abendland 13: 41–55.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1968) Der heroische Brief: Bestandaufnahme, Geschichte, Kritik einer humanistisch-barocken Literaturgattung. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1972) Epistulae Heroidum. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1975) P. Ovidius Naso: Der Brief der Sappho an Phaon (Zetemata 58). Munich.

Duchêne, R. (1998) “La Lettre: genre masculin et pratique féminine,” in L'Épistolaire, un genre féminin? ed. Planté, C.. Paris: 27–50.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (1989) “On the Way from Colchis to Corinth: Medea in Book 4 of the ‘Argonautica’,” Hermes 117: 455–70.Google Scholar

Easterling, P. E. (1981) “The End of the Trachiniae,” Illinois Classical Studies 6: 56–74.Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1992) Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Eggerding, F. (1908) “De Heroidum Oviduanarum Epistulis Quae Vocantur Commentationes: Agitur Imprimis de Didone, Phaedra, Penelopa.” Dissertation, Frederick Halensis Academy.

Ehwald, R. (1900) “Exegetischer Kommentar zur XIV Heroide Ovids.” Programm des Herzoglichen Gymnasium Ernestinum zu Gotha. Gotha.

Eisner, R. (1977) “Ariadne in Art, Prehistory to 400 B.C.,” Rivista di Studi Classici 25: 165–81.Google Scholar

Eitrem, S. (1941) “La magie comme motif Littéraire chez les Grecs et les Romains,” Symbolae Osloenses 21: 39–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, R. E. (1996) Roman Literary Culture from Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Faraone, C. A., and Obbink, D. (eds.) (1991) Magika Hiera: Ancient Greek Magic and Religion. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Faraone, C. A., and Obbink, D. (1999) Ancient Greek Love Magic. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York and Oxford.

Farrell, J. (1998) “Reading and Writing the Heroides,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 94: 307–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1992) “Si licet et fas est: Ovid's Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech under the Principate,” in Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. Powell, A.. London: 1–25.Google Scholar

Fetterley, J. (1978) The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Fiction. Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar

Fischer, U. (1969). “Ignotum hoc aliis ille novavit opus: Beobachtungen zur Darstellungskunst Ovids in den Heroides unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Briefpaare her. 16 und 17 (Paris und Helena) und her. 20 und 21 (Acontius und Cydippe).” Dissertation, Augsburg.

Fish, J. (2004) “Physician, Heal Thyself: The Intertextuality of Ovid's Exile Poetry and the Remedia Amoris,” Latomus 63.4: 864–72.Google Scholar

Flaherty, S. M. (1994) “The Rhetoric of Female Self-Destruction: A Study in Homer, Euripides, and Ovid.” Dissertation, Yale University.

Flaubert, G. (1957) Madame Bovary: moeurs de province. Paris.Google Scholar

Foley, H. (2001) Female Acts in Greek Tragedy. Princeton.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1945) Ovid: A Poet between Two Worlds (Sather Lectures vol. 18). Berkeley.Google Scholar

Frassinetti, P. (1974) “La Protesilaudamia di Levio,” in Poesia latina in frammenti: Miscellanea Filologica. Genoa: 315–26.Google Scholar

Frécaut, J.-M. (1972) L'Esprit et l'humour chez Ovide. Grenoble.Google Scholar

Fredrick, D. (1997) “Reading Broken Skin: Violence in Roman Elegy,” in Roman Sexualities, eds. Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B.. Princeton: 172–96.Google Scholar

Fulkerson, L. (2002a) “(Un)Sympathetic Magic: A Study of Heroides 13,” American Journal of Philology 123: 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fulkerson, L. (2002b) “Writing Yourself to Death: Strategies of (Mis)reading in Heroides 2,” Materiali e Discussioni 48: 145–65.Google Scholar

Fulkerson, L. (2003) “Chain(ed) Mail: Hypermestra and the Dual Readership of Heroides 14,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 133: 123–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fulkerson, L. (2004) “Omnia Vincit Amor: Why the Remedia Fail,” Classical Quarterly 54: 211–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuss, D. (1989) Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature, and Difference. New York.Google Scholar

Fyler, J. M. (1971) “Omnia Vincit Amor: Incongruity and the Limitations of Structure in Ovid's Elegiac Poetry,” Classical Journal 66: 196–203.Google Scholar

Gager, J. G. (1992) Curse Tablets and Binding Spells from the Ancient World. Oxford.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1972) The Herakles Theme: The Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. Totowa, N.J.Google Scholar

Gamel, M. -K. (1998) “Reading as a Man: Performance and Gender in Roman Elegy,” Helios 25: 79–95.Google Scholar

Gibert, J. C. (1997) “Euripides' Hippolytus Plays: Which Came First?” Classical Quarterly 47: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, B. (1999) “Ovid on Reading: Reading Ovid. Reception in Ovid Tristia II,” Journal of Roman Studies 89: 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilula, D. (1981) “A Consideration of Phaedra's EYKΛEIA,” Sileno 7: 121–33.Google Scholar

Giomini, R. (1993) “Ancora sulla struttura retorica nelle Heroides Ovidiane: l'Epistola di Fedra a Ippolito,” in Cultura e Lingue Classiche 3, ed. Biagio, A.. Rome.Google Scholar

Gold, B. K. (1993) “‘But Ariadne was Never There in the First Place’: Finding the Female in Roman Poetry,” in Feminist Theory and the Classics, eds. Rabinowitz, N. S. and Richlin, A.. New York and London: 75–101.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1965) “Amatoria Critica,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 9: 1–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1974) Review of Dörrie's text of the Heroides, Gnomon 46: 475–84.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1977) Heroides and Amores. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Gordon, P. (1997) “The Lover's Voice in Heroides 15: Or, Why is Sappho a Man?” in Roman Sexualities, eds. Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B.. Princeton: 274–94.Google Scholar

Goud, T. E. and Yardley, J. C. (1988) “Dido's Burning Effigy: Aeneid 4.508,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 131: 386–8.Google Scholar

Grantz, F. H. (1955) “Studien zur Darstellungskunst Ovids in den Heroides.” Dissertation, Kiel.

Grimal, P. (1963) “L'Originalité de Sénèque dans la Tragédie de Phèdre,” Revue des Études Latines 41: 297–314.Google Scholar

Guilleragues, G. J. (1972) Lettres Portugaises, ed. Deloffre, F. and Rougeot, J.. Geneva.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Hall, J. B. (1990) “Conjectures in Ovid's Heroides,” Illinois Classical Studies 15: 263–92.Google Scholar

Hall, J. B. (1999) “Ovid” (Review of Galasso and Casali). Classical Review 49: 390–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallett, J. P. (1989) “Woman as Same and Other in Classical Roman Elite,” Helios 16: 59–78.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (2002) Ovid's Poetics of Illusion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (1989) Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Harvey, E. D. (1989) “Ventriloquizing Sappho: Ovid, Donne, and the Erotics of the Feminine Voice,” Criticism 31: 115–38.Google Scholar

Heinze, T. (1993) “The Authenticity of Ovid Heroides 12 Reconsidered,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 38: 94–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinze, T. (1997) P. Ovidius Naso: Der XII Heroidenbrief: Medea an Jason mit einer Beilage: Die Fragmente der Tragödie Medea: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar. Leiden.

Hemelrijk, E. (1999) Matrona Docta: Educated Women in the Roman Elite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1986) “Becoming a Heroine: Penelope's Ovid,” Liverpool Classical Monthly 11: 7–10, 114–19.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1991) “Wrapping up the Case: Reading Ovid, Amores 2,7 (+ 8): I,” Materiali e Discussioni 27: 37–88.Google Scholar

Herter, H. (1940) “Theseus und Hippolytus,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 89: 273–92.Google Scholar

Herter, H. (1971) “Phaidra in griechischer und römischer Gestalt,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 14: 44–77.Google Scholar

Hetzner, U. (1963) Andromeda und Tarpeia. Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie, vol. viii. Meisenheim.Google Scholar

Hexter, R. J. (1986) Ovid and Medieval Schooling: Studies in Medieval School Commentaries on Ovid's Ars amatoria, Epistulae ex Ponto, and Epistulae heroidum. Munich.

Hinds, S. (1987a) The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1987b) “Generalising about Ovid,” Ramus 16: 4–31.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1987c) “The Poetess and the Reader: Further Steps Toward Sulpicia,” Hermathena 143: 29–46.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1993) “Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the Life of an Intertextual Heroine,” Materiali e Discussioni 30: 9–47.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hintermeier, C. M. (1993) Die Briefpaare in Ovids Heroides: Tradition und Innovation. Palingensiaxli. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Holzberg, N. (1998) Ovid: Dichter und Werk. Munich.Google Scholar

Housman, A. E. (1897) “Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Review 11: 102–6, 200–4, 238–42, 286–90, 425–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hross, H. (1958) “Die Klagen der verlassenen Heroiden in der lateinischen Dichtung: Untersuchungen der Motivik und zur dichterischen Form.” Dissertation, Munich.

Hubaux, J. (1926) “Ovide et Sappho,” Musée Belge 30: 197–218.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1989) Apollonius of Rhodes: Argonautica Book III. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1993) The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irigaray, L. (1985) This Sex Which is Not One, trans. Porter, C.. Cornell.Google ScholarPubMed

Jacobson, H. (1974) Ovid's Heroides. Princeton.Google Scholar

Jäkel, S. (1973) “The 14th Heroid Letter of Ovid and the Danaid Trilogy of Aeschylus,” Mnemosyne 26: 239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, S. L. (2003) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Jeny, H. (1989) “Troizen as the Setting of Hippolytos Stephanephoros,” American Journal of Philology 110: 400–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, H. F., and Whittle, E. W. (eds.) (1980) Aeschylus: The Suppliants, 3 vols. Denmark.Google Scholar

Johnston, S. I. (1999) Restless Dead: Encounters between the Living and the Dead in Ancient Greece. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Jolivet, J. -C. (2001) Allusion et fiction épistolaire dans les Héroïdes: Recherches sur l'intertextualité ovidienne. Collection de l'École Française de Rome, 289. Paris.

Kauffman, L. S. (1986) Discourses of Desire: Gender, Genre, and Epistolary Fictions. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1984) “The Epistolary Mode and the First of Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 34: 413–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1992) “‘Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference,” in Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. Powell, A.. London: 26–58.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1993) The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (2002) “Epistolarity: the Heroides,” in The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, ed. Hardie, P.. Cambridge: 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1970) “Notes on Ovid: III,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 74: 169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1979) “Two Disputed Passages in the Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 73: 394–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1995) “‘Dear Helen…’: the pithanotate prophasis?” Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 8: 187–207.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1996) Ovid: Heroides XVI–XXI. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Keuls, E. (1974) Water Carriers in Hades: A Study of Catharsis through Toil in Classical Antiquity. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Kirfel, E. A. (1969) Untersuchungen zur Briefform der Heroides Ovids (Noctes Romanae 11). Bern and Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Knox, P. E. (1986) “Ovid's Medea and the Authenticity of Heroides 12,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knox, P. E. (1995) Ovid: Heroides – Select Epistles. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Knox, P. E. (1998) “Ariadne on the Rocks: Influences on Ovid, Her. 10,” in Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, eds. Knox, P. E. and Foss, C.. Stuttgart and Leipzig: 72–84.Google Scholar

Knox, P. E. (2002) “The Heroides: Elegiac Voices,” in Brill's Companion to Ovid, ed. Boyd, B. W.. Leiden: 117–39.Google Scholar

Koltowski, I. (1960) “De Poematis Ovidio Falso Adscriptis,” Eos 50: 177–95.Google Scholar

Labate, M. (1977) “La Canace Ovidiana e L'Eolo di Euripide,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 7: 583–93.Google Scholar

Labate, M. (1984) L'arte di farsi amare: modelli culturali e progetto didascalico nell'elegia ovidiana. Pisa.Google Scholar

Lachmann, K. (1876) “De Ovidii epistulis,” in Kleinere Schriften, 2, repr. Berlin and New York 1974.Google Scholar

Landolfi, L. (2000) Scribentis Imago: Eroine Ovidiane e Lamento Epistolare. Bologna.Google Scholar

Larmour, D. H. J. (1990) “Tragic Contaminatio in Ovid's Metamorphoses: Procne and Medea; Philomela and Iphigeneia (6.424–674); Scylla and Phaedra (8.19–151),” Illinois Classical Studies 15: 131–41.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (1997) “Ovid, Heroides 6.1–2,” Classical Quarterly 91: 605–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindheim, S. H. (2000) “Omnia vincit amor: Or, Why Oenone Should Have Known It Would Never Work Out (Eclogue 10 and Heroides 5),” Materiali e Discussioni 44: 83–101.Google Scholar

Lindheim, S. H. (2003) Mail and Female: Epistolary Narrative and Desire in Ovid's Heroides. Madison, Wisc.

Lipking, L. (1988) Abandoned Women and Poetic Tradition. Chicago and London.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. (1963) Review of Oxyrhynchus Papyri 27, Gnomon 35: 433–55.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (forthcoming). Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome.

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1994) “Vergil's Aeneid: Subversion by Intertextuality,” Greece and Rome 41: 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1998) “Love and Death: Laodamia and Protesilaos in Catullus, Propertius, and Others,” Classical Quarterly 48: 200–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malherbe, A. J. (1988) Ancient Epistolary Theorists (Sources for Biblical Study, 19). Atlanta, Ga.Google Scholar

Maltby, R. (1991) A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymology. Leeds.Google Scholar

March, J. R. (1987) The Creative Poet: Studies on the Treatment of Myths in Greek Poetry, BICS suppl. 49. London.Google Scholar

Maurer, J. (1990) Untersuchungen zur poetischen Technik und den Vorbildern der Ariadne-Epistel Ovids. Frankfurt and Bern.Google Scholar

Mayer, M. (1885) “Der Protesilaos des Euripides,” Hermes 20: 101–43.Google Scholar

McKinley, K. (2001) Reading the Ovidian Heroine: “Metamorphoses” Commentaries 1100–1618. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Means, T. (1929) “A Comparison of the Treatment by Vergil and by Ovid of the Aeneas–Dido Myth,” Classical World 23: 41–4.Google Scholar

Merklin, H. (1968) “Arethusa und Laodamia,” Hermes 96: 461–94.Google Scholar

Merone, E. (1964) Studi sulle Eroidi di Ovidio. Naples.Google Scholar

Milnor, K. L. (2002) “Sulpicia's (Corpo)reality: Elegy, Authorship, and the Body in [Tib.] 3.13,” ClAnt. 21: 259–82.Google Scholar

Miner, E. (1986) “Some Issues for Study of Integrated Collections,” in Poems in Their Place: The Intertextuality and Order of Poetic Collections, ed. Fraistat, N.. Chapel Hill and London: 18–43.Google Scholar

Moi, T. (1985) Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. London and New York.Google Scholar

Monti, R. C. (1981) The Dido Episode and the Aeneid: Roman Social and Political Values in the Epic. Leiden.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. E. (1985) “Imitation and Originality in Ovid: Metamorphoses 1.477 and Heroides 15,” American Journal of Philology 106: 456–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers, K. S. (1994) Ovid's Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor.

Naylor, H. D. (1911) “The Alleged Hyperbaton of Heroides 3.19,” Classical Review 25: 42.Google Scholar

Newlands, C. E. (1997) “The Metamorphosis of Ovid's Medea,” in Clauss and Johnston 1997: 178–210.

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970) A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book 1. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nugent, S. G. (1990) “Tristia 2: Ovid and Augustus,” in Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate, eds. Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M.. Berkeley: 239–57.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J. J. (1993) “Dido as ‘Interpreting Character’ at Aeneid 4.56–66,” Arethusa 26: 99–114.Google Scholar

Oppel, E. (1968) “Ovids Heroides: Studien zur inneren Form und zur Motivation.” Dissertation, Erlangen-Nürnberg.

Ottone, M. D. (2003) “Epic and Elegy in Ovid's Heroides: Paris, Helen, and Homeric Intertext.” Dissertation, Duke University.

Palmer, A. (1898) P. Ovidi Nasonis Heroides (final editing by Purser, L.). Oxford.Google Scholar

Paratore, E. (1953) “Sulla Phaedra di Seneca,” Dioniso 15: 199–234.Google Scholar

Pattoni, M. P. (1991) “Ov. Her. IX 121ss. e le Trachinie di Sofocle,” Aevum Antiquum 4: 115–52.Google Scholar

Pearson, C. S. (1980) “Simile and Imagery in Ovid Heroides 4 and 5,” Illinois Classical Studies 5: 110–29.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. (1985) Callimachus, 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Philippides, K. (1996) “Canace Misunderstood: Ovid's Heroides XI,” Mnemosyne 49: 426–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pichon, R. (1909) “La Magie dans le IVe Chant de l'Énéide,” Revue de Philologie 33: 247–54.Google Scholar

Pratt, L. H. (1993) Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Pucci, P. (1987) Odysseus Polutropos: Intertextual Readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad. Ithaca.

Pulbrook, M. (1977) “The Original Published Form of Ovid's Heroides,” Hermathena 122: 29–45.Google Scholar

Purnelle, G. (1990) Ovide: Epistulae Heroidum. Liège.Google Scholar

Quinn, K. (1982) “The Poet and his Audience in the Augustan Age,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.30: 75–180.Google Scholar

Rabinowitz, P. J. (1986) “Shifting Stands, Shifting Standards: Reading, Interpretation, and Literary Judgment,” Arethusa 19: 115–34.Google Scholar

Rahn, H. (1958) “Ovids elegische Epistel,” Antike und Abendland 7: 105–20.Google Scholar

Reckford, K. (1974) “Phaedra and Pasiphae: The Pull Backward,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 104: 307–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reeson, J. (2001) Ovid: Heroides 11, 13 & 14: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Reeve, M. D. (1973) “Notes on Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 67: 325–38.Google Scholar

Ribbeck, O. (1875/1968) Die römische Tragödie im Zeitalter der Republik. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Rimell, V. (1999) “Epistolary Fictions: Authorial Identity in Heroides 15,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45: 109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, D. H. (1997) “Afterword: Ending and Aftermath, Ancient and Modern,” in Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D.. Princeton: 251–73.Google Scholar

Roisman, H. (1999) Nothing Is As It Seems: The Tragedy of the Implicit in Euripides' Hippolytus. Lanham, Md.

Romilly, J., (1975) Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosati, G. (1985) “Forma elegiaca di un simbolo letterario: la Fedra di Ovidio,” in Atti delle Giornate di Studio su Fedra, ed. Uglione, Renato. Turin: 113–31.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (1988) “Il parto maledetto di Medea (Ovidio, Her. 6,156s.),” Materiali e Discussioni20–1: 305–9.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (1991) “Protesilao, Paride e l'amante elegiaco: un modello Omerico in Ovidio,” Maia 43: 103–14.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (1992) “L'elegia al femminile: le Heroides di Ovidio (e altre heroides),” Materiali e Discussioni 29: 71–94.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (1996) “Sabinus, the Heroides and the Poet-Nightingale. Some Observations on the Authenticity of the Epistula Sapphus,” Classical Quarterly 46: 207–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenmeyer, P. A. (1996) “Love Letters in Callimachus, Ovid and Aristaenetus or the Sad Fate of a Mailorder Bride,” Materiali e Discussioni 36: 9–31.Google Scholar

Rosenmeyer, P. A. (1997) “Ovid's Heroides and Tristia: Voices from Exile,” Ramus 26.1: 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenmeyer, P. A. (2001) Ancient Epistolary Fictions: The Letter in Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Russ, J. (1973) “What Can a Heroine Do? Or Why Women Can't Write,” in Images of Women in Fiction: Feminist Perspectives, ed. Cornillion, S. K.. Green, Bowling, Ohio: 3–20.Google Scholar

Schmidt, E. A. (1967) “Ariadne bei Catull und Ovid,” Gymn. 74: 489–501.Google Scholar

Schmitz-Cronenbröck, W. (1937) “Die Anfänge der Heroiden des Ovid.” Dissertation, Dusseldorf.

Séchan, L. (1953) “La légende de Protésilas,” Bulletin de l'Association G. Budé 12: 3–27.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1965) “The Tragedy of the Hippolytus: The Waters of Ocean and the Untouched Meadow,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology: 70: 117–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, C. (1977) “Sophocles' Trachiniae: Myth, Poetry, and Heroic Values,” Yale Classical Studies 25: 99–158.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1984) “Underreading and Intertextuality: Sappho, Simaetha, and Odysseus in Theocritus' Second Idyll,” Arethusa 17: 201–9.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1986) Language and Desire in Seneca's Phaedra. Princeton.

Sharrock, A. R. (1991) “Womanufacture,” Journal of Roman Studies 81: 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharrock, A. R. (1994a) Seduction and Repetition in Ovid's Ars Amatoria 2. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. R. (1994b) “Ovid and the Politics of Reading,” Materiali e Discussioni 33: 97–122.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (eds.) (2000) Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations. Oxford.Google Scholar

Skinner, M. B. (1997) “Ego Mulier: The Construction of Male Sexuality in Catullus,” in Roman Sexualities, eds. Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B.. Princeton: 129–50.Google Scholar

Slater, N. W. (1990) Reading Petronius. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Smith, R. A. (1994) “Fantasy, Myth, and Love Letters: Text and Tale in Ovid's Heroides,” Arethusa 27: 247–73.Google Scholar

Smith, R. A. (1997) Poetic Allusion and Poetic Embrace in Ovid and Virgil. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1979) Theseus as Son and Stepson: A Tentative Illustration of Greek Mythological Mentality, BICS suppl. 40. London.Google Scholar

Spentzou, E. (2003) Readers and Writers in Ovid's Heroides: Transgressions of Genre and Gender. Oxford.

Spoth, F. (1992) Ovids Heroides als Elegien (Zetemata heft 89). München.

Spoth, F. (1993) “Ovids Ariadne-Brief (Her. 10) und die römische Liebeselegie,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 19: 239–60.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, P. (1987) “Die literarische Form der Epistulae Heroidum Ovids,” Gymn. 94: 128–45.Google Scholar

Stroh, W. (1971) Die römische Liebeselegie als werbende Dichtung. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Stroh, W. (1991) “Heroides ovidianae cur epistulas scribant,” in Ovidio poeta della memoria: Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi Sulmona, 19–21 ottobre 1989, ed. Papponetti, G.. Sulmo.Google Scholar

Svenbro, J. (1993) Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece, trans. Lloyd, J.. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (1981) “The Authenticity of the Letter of Sappho to Phaon (Heroides XV),” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 85: 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tissol, G. (1997) The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Princeton.

Torresin, G. (1998) “Ovids Phaedra in der mythologischen Tradition Ep. Her. 4 – der Brief einer Persona Delirans,” Classica et Mediaevalia 49: 163–235.Google Scholar

Treggiari, S. (1991) Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.

Treu, M. (1953) “Ovid und Sappho,” La Parola del Passato 8: 356–64.Google Scholar

Tschiedel, H. -J. (1969) “Phaedra und Hippolytus: Variationen eines tragischen Konfliktes.” Dissertation, Erlangen-Nürnberg.

Tupet, A. -M. (1970) “Didon Magicienne,” Revue des Études Latines 48: 229–58.Google Scholar

Tupet, A. -M. (1976) La Magie dans la poésie Latine I: des origines à la fin du régne d'Auguste. Paris.Google Scholar

Sickle, J. (1980) “The Book-Roll and Some Conventions of the Poetic Book,” Arethusa 13: 5–42.Google Scholar

Verducci, F. (1985) Ovid's Toyshop of the Heart. Princeton.Google Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. C. (1969) “Notes on Ovid, Heroides 9,” Classical Quarterly 63: 349–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. C. (1976) “Humor and Humanity in Ovid's Heroides,” Arethusa 9: 91–110.Google Scholar

Viarre, S. (1964) “L'image et la pensée dans les Métamorphoses d'Ovide.” Dissertation, Paris.

Viarre, S. (1977) “Le rhétorique et l'imagination dans la IXe Héroide (Déjanire à Hercule),” Helmantica 28: 549–60.Google Scholar

Voigt, E. -M. (1971) Sappho et Alcaea. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Von Albrecht, M. and Zinn, E. (1968) Ovid (Wege der Forschung 92). Darmstadt.

Albrecht, M. (1981) “Ovide et ses lecteurs,” Revue des Études Latines 59: 207–15.Google Scholar

Wilamowitz-Möllendorf, U. (1906) Griechische Tragödie. Berlin.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1987) “Time for Augustus: Ovid, Augustus, and the Fasti,” in Homo Viator: Classical Essays for J. Bramble, eds. Whitby, M.et al. Oxford: 221–30.Google Scholar

Webster, T. B. L. (1966) “The Myth of Ariadne from Homer to Catullus,” Greece and Rome 13: 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webster, T. B. L. (1967) The Tragedies of Euripides. London.Google Scholar