Book contents
- Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic
- Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Frontispiece
- Introduction
- Part I The role of oratory in Roman politics
- Part II Themes and oratorical careers
- Book part
- Bibliography
- Index locorum
- Subject index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2016
Book contents
- Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic
- Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Frontispiece
- Introduction
- Part I The role of oratory in Roman politics
- Part II Themes and oratorical careers
- Book part
- Bibliography
- Index locorum
- Subject index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic , pp. 328 - 362Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Albrecht, M. von (1989) Masters of Roman Prose from Cato to Apuleius, trans. N. Adkin. Leeds.Google Scholar
Albrecht, M. von (2010) ‘Caesar und die Macht des Wortes’, in Cesare: precursore o visionario?, ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 223–39.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. C. (1985) ‘Praemia in the quaestiones of the late Republic’, CPh 80: 20–32.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. C. (2002) The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Alföldi, A. (1956) ‘The main aspects of political propaganda on the coinage of the Roman Republic’, in Essays in Roman Coinage Presented to Harold Mattingly, eds. Carson, R. A. G. and Sutherland, C. H. V.. Oxford: 63–95.Google Scholar
Amela Valverde, L. (2001) ‘Inscripciones honoríficas dedicadas a Pompeyo Magno’, Faventia 23: 87–102.Google Scholar
Andersen, Ø. (2001) ‘How good should an orator be?’, in The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome: Essays in Honor of G. A. Kennedy, ed. Wooten, C. W.. Leiden: 3–16.Google Scholar
Arena, V. (2012) Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J. (1970) Romans on the Bay of Naples: A Social and Cultural Study of the Villas and their Owners from 150 B.C. to A.D. 400. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1956) ‘Review of E. Malcovati Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta’ (2nd edn, 1955), JRS 46: 218–21.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1965) ‘M. Porcius Cato and the annexation and early administration of Cyprus’, JRS 55: 110–21.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1972) ‘Tiberius Gracchus and the beginning of the Roman revolution’, ANRW I 1: 668–731.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (2004) ‘The pig and the priest’, in Ad fontes! Festschrift für Gerhard Dobesch zum 65. Geburtstag, eds. Heftner, H. and Tomaschitz, K.. Wien: 263–72.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (2009) ‘From the Iulii to Caesar’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Chichester: 1–22.Google Scholar
Balbo, A. (2009) ‘Attività giudiziaria criminale e civile nello stato romano tra la fine della repubblica e i primi anni di Ottaviano (49–29 a.C.)’, in Repressione criminale nella Roma repubblicana fra norma e persuasione, ed. Santalucia, B.. Padua: 527–76.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. (1939) ‘Consular provinces under the late Republic’, JRS 29: 57–73.Google Scholar
Bannon, C. J. (1997) The Brothers of Romulus: Fraternal Pietas in Roman Law, Literature, and Society. Princeton.Google Scholar
Barton, C. A. (1999) ‘The Roman blush: the delicate matter of self-control’, in Constructions of the Classical Body, ed. Porter, J. I.. Ann Arbor: 212–34.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. (2010a) ‘Catiline’s speeches in Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae’, in Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A.. Cambridge: 227–46.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. (2010b) ‘Caesar’s republican rhetoric and the veils of autocracy’, in Cesare: precursore o visionario?, ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 181–205.Google Scholar
Baudry, R. (2013) ‘Stéréotypes et défaites électorales à la fin de la République romaine’, in Miroir des autres, reflet de soi (2): stéréotypes, politique et société dans le monde occidental (de l’Antiquité romaine à l’époque contemporaine), eds. Ménard, H. and Courrier, C.. Paris: 117–43.Google Scholar
Bearzot, C., Geiger, J. and Ghilli, L. (1993) Plutarco. Vite parallele: Focione, Cato Uticense. Milano.Google Scholar
Beck, H. (2005) Karriere und Hierarchie: Die römische Aristokratie und die Anfänge des cursus honorum in der mittleren Republik. Berlin.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (2005) ‘Plutarch on the statesman’s independence of action’, in The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works I, Mnemosyne Supplementa, eds. de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T. and Schenkeveld, D. M.. Leiden and Boston: 105–14.Google Scholar
Behr, H. (1993) Die Selbstdarstellung Sullas: Ein aristokratischer Politiker zwischen persönlichem Führungsanspruch und Standessolidarität. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Bell, A. A. (1994) ‘Fact and exemplum in accounts of the deaths of Pompey and Caesar’, Latomus 53: 824–36.Google Scholar
Bellemore, J. (1996) ‘The quaestorship of Cato and the tribunate of Memmius’, Historia 45: 504–8.Google Scholar
Bellemore, J. (2005) ‘Cato’s opposition to Caesar in 59 bc’, in Roman Crossings: Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic, eds. Welch, K. and Hillard, T. W.. Swansea: 225–57.Google Scholar
Berg, C. van den (2014) The World of Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus: Aesthetics and Empire in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A. (2010) (eds.) Form and Function in Roman Oratory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Blank, D. L. (1996) ‘Philodemus on the technicity of rhetoric’, in Epicureismo greco e romano. Atti del congresso internazionale II, eds. Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M.. Napoli: 585–96.Google Scholar
Bleicken, J. (1957) ‘Oberpontifex und Pontifikalkollegium: Eine Studie zur römischen Sakralverfassung’, Hermes 85: 345–66.Google Scholar
Bloch, H. (1940) ‘L. Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus in Samothrace and Herculaneum’, AJA 44: 485–93.Google Scholar
Blois, L. de (2011) ‘The changing position of the military middle cadre in Roman politics at the end of the Republic’ in Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana: Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, eds. Blösel, W. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. Stuttgart: 81–92.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der (2003) ‘Officium and res publica: Cicero’s political role after the Ides of March’, C&M 54: 289–319.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der (2010) Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der (2011b) ‘Historical exempla as tools of praise and blame in Ciceronian oratory’, in Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, eds. Smith, C. and Covino, R.. Swansea: 49–67.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der (2013) ‘Fragmentary speeches: the oratory and political career of Piso Caesoninus’, in Community and Communication. Oratory and Politics in the Roman Republic, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 299–314.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der (forthcoming 1) ‘Novitas between Republic and Empire’, in Semantische Kämpfe zwischen Republik und Prinzipat? Studien zu Kontinuität und Transformation der politischen und sozialen Sprache in Rom, eds. Tiersch, C. and Nebelin, M.. Berlin.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der (forthcoming 2) ‘Ciceronian constructions of the oratorical past’, in Omnium Annalium Monumenta, eds. Sandberg, K. and Smith, C..Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der (forthcoming 3) ‘The reception of republican political communication: Tacitus’ choice of exemplary republican orators in context’, in Political Communication in the Roman World: Transmission and Exchange, ed. Lopez, C. Rosillo.Google Scholar
Bloomer, M. (1992) Valerius Maximus and the Rhetoric of the New Nobility. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Bloomer, M. (2011) The School of Rome: Latin Studies and the Origins of Liberal Education. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. (2000) ‘Die Geschichte des Begriffes mos maiorum von den Anfängen bis zu Cicero’, in Mos maiorum: Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik, eds. Linke, B. and Stemmler, M.. Stuttgart: 25–97.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. (2009) ‘Imperia extraordinaria liberae rei publicae - Studien zur Demilitiarisierung der römischen Nobilität’, unpublished Habilitationsschrift. Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. (2011) ‘Die Demilitarisierung der römischen Nobilität von Sulla bis Caesar’, in Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana: Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, eds. Blösel, W. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. Stuttgart: 55–80.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. (2016) ‘Provincial commands and money in the late Roman Republic’, in Money and Power in the Roman Republic, eds. Beck, H. and Jehne, M.. Latomus: 68–81.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. (1977) Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. (1988) From Arrian to Alexander: Studies in Historical Interpretation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Boterman, H. (1989) ‘Cato und die sogenannte Schwertübergabe im Dezember 50 v. Christus’, Hermes 117: 62–85.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1993) ‘History in the Dialogus de oratoribus and Tacitus the historian: a new approach to an old source’, Hermes 121: 335–49.Google Scholar
Broege, V. A. (1969) ‘The political career of Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus’, Diss. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. (1951–52) The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vols. i–ii. New York.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. (1986) The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. iii (suppl.). Atlanta.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. (1991) Candidates Defeated in Roman Elections: Some Ancient Roman “Also-Rans”. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Bruhns, H. (2000) ‘Caesar, “der wahre Gebieter”’, in Virtuosen der Macht: Herrschaft und Charisma von Perikles bis Mao, ed. Nippel, W.. München: 55–71.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1978) ‘Laus imperii’, in Imperialism in the Ancient World, eds. Garnsey, P. D. A. and Whittaker, C. R.. Cambridge: 159–91, 319–30.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (2013) Studies in Stoicism, eds. Griffin, M. and Samuels, A. with assistance of Crawford, M.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bücher, F. (2006) Verargumentierte Geschichte. Exempla Romana im politischen Diskurs der späten Republik, Hermes Einzelschriften 96. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, L. A. (1988) Politische Strategien der Optimaten in der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, L. A. (1990) ‘The political elite of the Roman Republic: comments on recent discussion of the concepts Nobilitas and Homo Novus’, Historia 39: 77–99.Google Scholar
Burden-Strevens, C. (2015) ‘Cassius Dio’s speeches and the collapse of the Roman Republic’, Diss. University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1982) ‘La retorica preciceroniana e la politica a Roma’, in Éloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron, Entretiens sur l’antiquté classique 28, ed. Ludwig, W.. Genève: 41–99.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1987) ‘Asianesimo e atticismo: retorica, letteratura e linguistica’, in Studi de retorica oggi in Italia, ed. Pennacini, A.. Bologna: 31–53.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1996) ‘Gli oratori romani nel passaggio dal II al I sec. a.C.’, in Per Enrica Malcovati. Atti del convegno di studie nel centenario della nascita. Como: 105–24.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1997) ‘The Asiatic style of Antony. Some considerations’, in Vir bonus dicendi peritus: Festschrift für A. Weische zum 65. Geburtstag, eds. Czapla, B., Lehmann, T. and Liell, S.. Wiesbaden: 13–26.Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (2010) ‘Who lived in the Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum: a settled question?’, in The Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum: Archaeology, Reception, and Digital Reconstruction, ed. Zarmakoupi, M.. Berlin and New York: 89–113.Google Scholar
Cape, R. W. (1995) ‘The rhetoric of politics in Cicero’s fourth Catilinarian’, AJPh 116: 255–77.Google Scholar
Carlsen, J. (2006) The Rise and Fall of a Roman Noble Family: The Domitii Ahenobarbi 196 bc–ad 68. Odense.Google Scholar
Carney, T. F. (1959) ‘Once again Marius’ speech after election in 108 bc.’, SO 35: 63–70.Google Scholar
Chamoux, F. (1989) Marcus Antonius: Der letzte Herrscher des griechischen Orients. Paris.Google Scholar
Chandler, C. E. (1996) ‘References to “Common Parlance” in Philod. Rhet. II’, in Epicureismo greco e romano. Atti del congresso internazionale II, eds. Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M.. Napoli: 597–610.Google Scholar
Chantraine, H. (1983) ‘Münzbild und Familiengeschichte in der römischen Republik’, Gymnasium 90: 530–45.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, M. P. (1933) ‘Some fragments of the propaganda of Mark Antony’, CQ 27: 172–7.Google Scholar
Chrissanthos, S. G. (2004) ‘Freedom of speech and the Roman Republican army’, in Free Speech in Classical Antiquity, eds. Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M.. Leiden and Boston: 341–67.Google Scholar
Churchill, J. B. (1999) ‘Ex qua quod vellent facerent: Roman magistrates’ authority over praeda and manubiae’, TAPhA 129: 85–116.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1985) Recht, Rhetorik, Politik: Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Rhetorischer Strategie. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (2007, Italian orig. 1995) Rome and Environs: An Archaeological Guide. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cole, N. (2009) ‘Republicanism, Caesarism, and political change’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Chichester: 418–30.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. (2000) ‘Entertaining Rome’, in Ancient Rome: The Archaeology of the Eternal City, eds. Coulston, J. and Dodge, H.. Oxford: 210–58.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (1996) Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2002) ‘Political movement: walking and ideology in Republican Rome’, in The Roman Gaze. Vision, Power, and the Body, ed. Fredrick, D.. Baltimore and London: 182–215.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2010) ‘Rhetorical education and social reproduction in the Republic and early Empire’, in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, eds. Dominik, W. and Hall, J.. Oxford: 69–82.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (forthcoming) ‘Julius Caesar: wit and irony’, in Cambridge Companion to Caesar, eds. Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (2010) ‘Cato the Elder and the origins of Roman autobiography’, in The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography, eds. Smith, C. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 15–40.Google Scholar
Craig, C. (1986) ‘Cato’s Stoicism and the understanding of Cicero’s speech for Murena’, TAPhA 116: 229–39.Google Scholar
Craig, C. (2002) ‘Bibliography’, in Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J. M.. Leiden: 533–99.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. W. (1984) M. Tullius Cicero: The Lost and Unpublished Orations, Hypomnemata 80. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. (1988) ‘The laws of the Romans: knowledge and diffusion’, in Estudios sobre la Tabula Siarensis, eds. Gonzales, J. and Arce, J.. Madrid: 127–40.Google Scholar
Crook, J. (1955) Consilium principis: Imperial Councils and Councellors from Augustus to Diocletian. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Damon, C. (2007) ‘Rhetoric and historiography’, in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, eds. Dominik, W. and Hall, J.. Oxford: 439–50.Google Scholar
Damon, C. and Mackay, C. S. (1995) ‘On the prosecution of C. Antonius in 79 B.C.’, Historia 44: 37–55.Google Scholar
Dauster, M. (2003) ‘Roman Republican sumptuary legislation: 182–102’, in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 11, ed. Deroux, C.. Bruxelles: 65–93.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (1980) ‘”Eloquentia popularis” et conduites symboliques des orateurs de la fin de la République: problèmes d’efficacité’, Quaderni di storia 6.12: 171–211.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (1983a) ‘L’action oratoire de C. Gracchus: L’image d’un modele’, in Demokratia et Aristokratia: à propos de Caius Gracchus: mots grecs et réalités romaines, ed. Nicolet, C.. Paris: 103–16.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (1983b) ‘Sfida o vendetta, minaccia o ricatto: L’accusa pubblica nelle mani dei giovani Romani alla fine della Repubblica’, in La paura dei padri nelle società antica e medievale, eds. Pellizer, E. and Zorzetti, N.. Rome and Bari: 99–112.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (1983c) ‘Les orateurs des municipes à Rome: intégration, réticences et snobismes’, in Les bourgeoisies municipales italiennes aux IIe et Ier siècles av. J.C., eds. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, M., Jean-Bérard, Centre. Paris: 309–23.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (1992) Le patronat judiciaire au dernier siècle de la Republique romaine. Rome.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (2009) ‘Accuser ou défendre. Quelle liberté de choix?’, in Repressione criminale nella Roma repubblicana fra norma e persuasione, ed. Santalucia, B.. Padua: 511–26.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (2011) ‘L’Éloquence judiciaire entre compétence aristocratique et spécialisation carriériste’, in Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana: Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, eds. Blösel, W. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. Stuttgart: 157–74.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (2012) ‘Crise de l’éloquence, crise de la cité’, in Letteratura e civitas: Transizioni dalla Repubblica all’Impero, ed. Citroni, M.. Pisa: 245–68.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (1950) ‘Elegantia Caesaris. Zu Caesar’s Reden und Commentarii’, Gymnasium 57: 112–23 = in Wege der Forschung. Caesar, ed. Rasmussen, D.. Darmstadt: 208–23.Google Scholar
Deniaux, E. (1973) ‘Un probleme de clientele: Marius et les Herennii’, Philologus 117: 179–96.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. E. (1926–29) ‘Antony’s funeral speech’, University of California Publications in Classical Philology 9: 127–48.Google Scholar
Diehl, H. (1988) Sulla und seine Zeit im Urteil Ciceros. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. (2007) ‘Tacitus and Pliny on oratory’, in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, eds. Dominik, W. and Hall, J.. Oxford: 323–38.Google Scholar
Donaldson, G. (2007) The First Modern Campaign: Kennedy, Nixon, and the Election of 1960. Plymouth.Google Scholar
Drumann, W. and Groebe, P. (1919) Geschichte Roms in seinem Übergange von der republikanischen zur monarchischen Verfassung, 2nd edn. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2005) Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2013) ‘Cicero and the politics of ambiguity: interpreting the Pro Marcello’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in the Roman Republic, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 211–25.Google Scholar
Duplá, A. (2011) ‘Consules populares’, in Consuls and res publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, eds. Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M., and Polo, F. Pina. Cambridge: 279–98.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2004) ‘Cicero’s devotio: the rôles of Dux and scape-goat in his Post Reditum rhetoric’, HSPh 102: 299–314.Google Scholar
Eden, P. T. (1962) ‘Caesar’s style: inheritance versus intelligence’, Glotta 40: 74–117.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. (2013) ‘Dionysius and Isaeus’, in Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change, eds. Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K.. Oxford: 43–49.Google Scholar
Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (2010) ‘Gespiegelte Erzählkunst in der Mariusrede des Sallust’, in Stimmen der Geschichte: Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie, ed. Pausch, D.. Berlin and New York: 157–82.Google Scholar
Elefante, M. (1997) Velleius Paterculus: Ad M. Vinicium consulem libri duo. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York.Google Scholar
Epstein, D. F. (1987) Personal Enmity in Roman Politics 218–43 bc. London, Sydney and New York.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. (1991) ‘Candidates and competition in consular elections at Rome between 218 and 49 bc’, AClass 34: 111–36.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. (2003a) Questioning Reputations: Essays on Nine Roman Republican Politicians. Pretoria.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. (2003b) ‘Gaius Marius and the consular elections for 106 bc’, in Literature, Art, History: Studies in Classical Antiquity in Honour of W. J. Henderson, eds. Basson, A. F. and Dominik, W. J.. Bern: 295–303.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. (2008) ‘Gaius and Marcus Marius in Iberia and Gaul: family affairs and provincial clients’, AClass 51: 77–90.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1978) ‘Imitation and decline. Rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, CPh 78: 102–116.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1997) ‘The contexts and occasions of Roman public rhetoric’, in Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, ed. Dominik, W. J.. London: 91–105.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2009) ‘Caesar as an intellectual’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Chichester: 141–56.Google Scholar
Farney, G. D. (1997) ‘The fall of the priest C. Sulpicius Galba and the first consulship of Marius’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 42: 23–38.Google Scholar
Farney, G. D. (2007) Ethnic Identity and Aristocratic Competition in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Faro, G. (2009) ‘Sul consilium del governatore nei processi capitali tra II e I secolo a.C.’, in Repressione criminale nella Roma repubblicana fra norma e persuasione, ed. Santalucia, B.. Padua: 169–181.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2007) Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Feig Vishnia, R. (2012) Roman Elections in the Age of Cicero: Society, Government and Voting, New York.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J. L. (1998) ‘Patroni et accusateurs dans la procédure de repetundis’, Revue historique de droit français et étranger 46: 17–46.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J. L. (1999) ‘À propos de deux passages des Philippiques (1,11–13 et 2,110): Remarques sur les honneurs religieux rendus à César en 45–44 et sur la politique d'Antoine après les Ides de Mars’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 1: 215–32.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J. L. (2001) ‘Réponse à Miriam Griffin’, in Lucrèce et Philodème: La polémique en philosophie, eds. Auvray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D.. Paris: 101–5.Google Scholar
Ferriès, M.-C. (2007) Les Partisans d’Antoine (des orphelins de César aux complices de Cléopâtre). Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. (1995) ‘Die pompa funebris. Adlige Konkurrenz und annalistische Erinnerung in der römischen Republik’, in Memoria als Kultur, ed. Oexle, O. G.. Göttingen: 115–48.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. (2003) Ritualisierte Politik: Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft im Alten Rom. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2006) The Art of Forgetting. Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2013) ‘Beyond the contio: political communication in 133 bc’, in Community and Communication. Oratory and Politics in the Roman Republic, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 85–100.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, L. S. (2013) Persuasive Language in Cicero’s Pro Milone: A Close Reading and Commentary. London.Google Scholar
Freyburger-Gallard, M.-L. (1997) Aspects du vocabulaire politique et institutionnel de Dion Cassius. Paris.Google Scholar
Frézouls, E. (1983) ‘La construction du theatrum lapideum et son contexte politique’, in Théâtre et spectacles dans l’antiquité. Actes du Colloque de Strasbourg 5–7 novembre 1981. Leiden: 193–214.Google Scholar
Fuchs, M. (1987) Untersuchungen zur Ausstattung römischer Theater in Italien und den Westprovinzen des Imperium Romanum. Mainz am Rhein.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1957) ‘Note sulla Polemica Anticiceroniana di Asinio Pollio’, Rivista Storica Italiana 69: 317–39.Google Scholar
Gagliardo, M. C. and Packer, J. E. (2006) ‘A new look at Pompey’s theatre: history, documentation and recent excavation’, AJA 110: 93–122.Google Scholar
Gaillard, J. (1975) ‘Que représentent les Gracques pour Cicéron?’, BAGB 4.34: 499–529.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. N. (2001) ‘Philodemus and Cicero on models of rhetorical expression’, in Cicéron et Philodème: La polémique en philosophie, eds. Avray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D.. Paris: 259–72.Google Scholar
Gargola, D. J. (1995) Lands, Laws, and Gods: Magistrates and Ceremony in the Regulation of Public Lands in Republican Rome. Chapel Hill and London.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (1971) ‘A commentary on Plutarch’s Cato minor’, Diss. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (1979) ‘Munatius Rufus and Thrasea Paetus on Cato the Younger’, Athenaeum 57: 48–72.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (2000) ‘Plutarch on late republican orators and rhetoric’, in Rhetorical Theory and Praxis in Plutarch. Acta of the IVth International Congress of the International Plutarch Society, ed. van der Stockt, L.. Louvain/Namur: 211–24.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (2008) The First Hall of Fame: A Study of the Statues in the Forum Augustum. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. (1941) Cn. Pompeius Strabo und der Aufstieg seines Sohnes Magnus, Abhandlungen der Preuβischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 14. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. (1968) Caesar. Politician and Statesman, trans. from German by P. Needham. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. (2005) Pompeius. Lebensbild eines Römers, orig. ed. 1944; new edition with overview of scholarship and extra bibliography by E. Herrmann-Otto. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2003) ‘Pliny and the art of (in)offensive self-praise’, Arethusa 36: 235–54.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2011) Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gleason, K. L. (1990) ‘The Garden portico of Pompey the Great’, Expedition 32.2: 4–13.Google Scholar
Gleason, K. L. (1994) ‘Porticus Pompeiana: a new perspective on the first public park of ancient Rome’, Journal of Garden History 14: 13–27.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1988) ‘Cicero’s philosophical affiliations’, in The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, eds. Dillon, J. M. and Long, A. A.. Berkeley: 34–69.Google Scholar
Goar, R. J. (1987) The Legend of Cato Uticensis from the First Century B.C. to the Fifth Century A.D. Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2009) ‘The faces of eloquence: the Dialogus de oratoribus’, in The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus, ed. Woodman, A. J.. Cambridge: 73–84.Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. (1974) Review of C. Weyssenhoff (1970) Ciceronis Epistularum Fragmenta. Wrocław, Warszawa and Krakow, Gnomon 18: 367–9.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1995) ‘Silencing the troublemaker: De Legibus I.39’, in Cicero the Philosopher, ed. Powell, J. G. F.. Oxford: 85–113.Google Scholar
Gotoff, H. C. (1993) Cicero’s Caesarian Speeches: A Stylistic Commentary. Chapel Hill and London.Google Scholar
Gotter, U. (1996) Der Diktator ist tot! Politik in Rom zwischen den Iden des März und der Begründung des Zweiten Triumvirats. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (1990) ‘Appian and Cassius’ speech before Philippi (Bella civilia 4.90–100)’, Phoenix 44: 158–81.Google Scholar
Graves, R. (1979) The Twelve Caesars: Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus, rev. edn by Grant, M.. London.Google Scholar
Green, P. (1978) ‘Caesar and Alexander: aemulatio, imitatio, comparatio’, American Journal of Ancient History 3: 1–26.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1986) ‘Philosophy, Cato, and Roman suicide’, G&R 33: 64–77 and 192–202.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1989) ‘Philosophy, politics, and politicians at Rome’, in Philosophia Togata I: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, eds. Griffin, M. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 1–37.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1997) ‘From Aristotle to Atticus: Cicero and Matius on Friendship’, in Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome, eds. Barnes, J. and Griffin, M.. Oxford: 86–109.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (2001) ‘Piso, Cicero and their audience’, in Cicéron et Philodème: La polémique en philosophie, eds. Avray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D.. Paris: 85–99.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. (2012) The Art of Caesar’s Bellum Civile: Literature, Ideology, and Community. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. (forthcoming) ‘Speeches in the Commentarii’, in Cambridge Companion to Caesar, eds. Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1968a) Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts 149–78 bc. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1968b) ‘Pompey and the Pisones’, (Californian Studies in) Classical Antiquity 1: 155–70.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1969) ‘The consular elections for 53 B.C.’, in Hommages à Marcel Renard, ed. Bibauw, J.. Bruxelles: 311–21.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1971) ‘Some criminal trials of the late Republic: political and prosopographical problems’, Athenaeum 49: 54–69.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1974) The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1992) Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca and New York.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1998) ‘Rome and the myth of Alexander’, in Ancient History in a Modern University, eds. Hillard, T. W. et al. Grand Rapids: 1.178–91.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (2009) ‘Caesar as a politician’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Chichester: 23–36.Google Scholar
Hall, J. (1996) ‘Cicero Fam. 5.8 and Fam. 15.5 in the light of modern politeness theory’, Antichthon 30: 19–33.Google Scholar
Hall, J. (2009b) ‘Serving the times: Cicero and Caesar the Dictator’, in Writing Politics in Imperial Rome, eds. Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P.. Leiden and Boston: 89–110.Google Scholar
Hall, L. G. H. (1998) ‘Ratio and Romanitas in the Bellum Gallicum’, in Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments, eds. Welch, K. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 11–43.Google Scholar
Hall, U. (1972) ‘Appian, Plutarch, and the tribunician elections of 123 B.C.’, Athenaeum 50: 3–35.Google Scholar
Hammar, I. (2013) Making Enemies: The Logic of Immorality in Ciceronian Oratory. Lund.Google Scholar
Harders, A.-C. (2010) ‘Roman patchwork families: surrogate parenting, socialization, and the shaping of tradition’, in Children, Memory, and Family Identity in Roman Culture, eds. Dasen, V. and Späth, T.. Oxford: 49–72.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2012) Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hatscher, C. R. (2000) Charisma und res publica: Max Webers Herrschaftssoziologie und die Römische Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hayne, L. C. (1978) ‘The political astuteness of the Antonii’, l’Antiquité Classique 47: 96–105.Google Scholar
Heftner, H. (1995) Plutarch und der Aufstieg des Pompeiu: Ein historischer Kommentar zu Plutarchs Pompeiusvita. Teil I: Kap. 1–45. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Heftner, H. (2005) ‘Marius und der Eid auf das Ackergesetz des Saturninus: zu Appian Bella civilia I 29–31 und Plutarch Marius 29’, Tyche 20: 23–45.Google Scholar
Heider, U. (2000) ‘Lucius Sergius Catilina – ein Verbrecher aus verlorener Ehre?’, in Von Romulus zu Augustus: Groβe Gestalten der römischen Republik, eds. Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Stein-Hölkeskamp, E.. München: 268–78.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc’h, (1972) Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des parts politiques sous la république. Paris.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L. (1926) ‘Cicero’s correspondence with Brutus and Calvus on oratorical style’, AJPh 47: 234–58.Google Scholar
Heusch, C. (2011) Die Macht der memoria: Die Noctes Atticae des Aulus Gellius im Licht der Erinnerungskultur des 2. Jahrhunderts n. Chr. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Hickson-Hahn, F. (2000) ‘Pompey’s supplicatio duplicata: a novel form of thanksgiving’, Phoenix 54: 244–54.Google Scholar
Hiebel, D. (2009) Rôles institutionnel et politique de la contio sous la république romaine: 287-49 av. J.-C. Paris.Google Scholar
Hillman, T. P. (1992) ‘Plutarch and the first consulship of Pompeius and Crassus’, Phoenix 46: 124–37.Google Scholar
Hofmann-Löbl, I. (1996) Die Calpurnii: Politisches Wirken und familiäre Kontinuität. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1995) ‘Oratoris maxima scaena: Reden vor dem Volk in der politischen Kultur der Republik’, in Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik, ed. Jehne, M.. Stuttgart: 11–49 = K.-J. Hölkeskamp (2004) 219–56 with addenda.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1996) ‘Exempla und mos maiorum: Überlegungen zum kollektiven Gedächtnis der Nobilität’, in Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt: Soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewusstsein, eds. Gehrke, H.-J. and Möller, A.. Tübingen: 301–38 = K.-J. Hölkeskamp (2004) 169–98 with addenda.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1999) ‘Römische gentes und griechische Genealogien’, in Rezeption und Identität. Die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma, eds. Vogt-Spira, G. and Rommel, B. (with Musäus, I.). Stuttgart: 115–34 = K.-J. Hölkeskamp (2004) 199–217 with addenda.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2000a) ‘Lucius Cornelius Sulla. Revolutionär und restaurativer Reformer’, in Von Romulus zu Augustus. Groβe Gestalten der römischen Republik, eds. Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Stein-Hölkeskamp, E.. München: 199–218.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2000b) ‘The Roman Republic: government of the People, by the People, for the People?’, SCI 19: 203–23 = K.-J. Hölkeskamp (2004) 257–80 with addenda (in German).Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2001) ‘Capitol, Comitium und Forum. Öffentliche Räume, sakrale Topographie und Erinnerungslandschaften’, in Studien zu antiken Identitäten, ed. Faller, S.. Würzburg: 97–132 = K.-J. Hölkeskamp (2004) 137–68 with addenda.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2004) Senatus Populusque Romanus: Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimensionen und Deutungen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2005) ‘Images of power: memory, myth and monuments in the Roman Republic’, review of P. J. Holliday, The Origins of Roman Historical Commemoration in the Visual Arts. Cambridge, 2002, in SCI 24: 249–71.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2006) ‘Konsens und Konkurrenz. Die politische Kultur der römischen Republik in neuer Sicht’, Klio 88.2: 360–96.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2008) ‘Hierarchie und Konsens. Pompae in der politischen Kultur der römischen Republik’, in Machtfragen. Zur kulturellen Repräsentation und Konstruktion von Macht in Antike, Mittelalter und Neuzeit, eds. Arweiler, A. H. and Gauly, B. M.. Stuttgart: 79–126.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2010) Reconstructing the Roman Republic: An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Princeton.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2011a) ‘Self-serving sermons: oratory and the self-construction of the republican aristocrat’, in Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, eds. Smith, C. and Covino, R.. Swansea: 17–34.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2011b) ‘“Prominenzrollen” und “Karrierefelder” – einleitende Bemerkungen zu Thematik und Begriffen’, in Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana: Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, eds. Blösel, W. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. Stuttgart: 9–27.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2011c) ‘The Roman Republic as theatre of power: the consuls as leading actors’, in Consuls and res publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, eds. Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M. and Polo, F. Pina. Cambridge: 161–81.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2012) ‘Im Gewebe der Geschichte(n). Memoria, Monumente und ihre mythhistorische Vernetzung’, Klio 94: 380–414.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2013a) ‘Friends, Romans, Countrymen: addressing the Roman people and the rhetoric of inclusion’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in the Roman Republic, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 11–28.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2013b) ‘Concordia contionalis. Die rhetorische Konstruktion von Konsens in der römischen Republik’, in Genesis und Dynamiken der Mehrheitsentscheidung, eds. Flaig, E. and Müller-Luckner, E.. München: 101–28.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2014) ‘Konkurrenz als sozialer Handlungsmodus – Positionen und Perspektiven der historischen Forschung’, in Konkurrenz in der Geschichte: Praktiken – Werte – Institutionalisierungen, ed. Jessen, R.. Frankfurt am Main: 33–57.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (1982) ‘Die Bedeutung der Münzen für das Verständnis der politischen Repräsentationskunst der späten römischen Republik’, in Actes du 9ème Congrès International de Numismatique: Berne, Septembre 1979, eds. Hackens, T. and Weiller, R.. Louvain-la-Neuve: Association Internationale des Numismates Professionnels: 269–82.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (1984) Staatsdenkmal und Publikum vom Untergang der Republik bis zur Festigung des Kaisertums in Rom. Konstanz.Google Scholar
Homeyer, H. (1964) Die antiken Berichte über den Tod Ciceros und ihre Quellen. Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. (1983) Death and Renewal: Sociological Studies in Roman History 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hurlet, F. (2010) ‘Pouvoirs extraordinares et tromperie. La tentation de la monarchie à la fin de la République romaine (82-44 av. J.-C)’, in Private and Public Lies: The Discourse of Despotism and Deceit in the Ancient World, eds. Turner, A. J., Chong-Gossard, K. O. and Vervaet, F. J.. Leiden and Boston: 107–30.Google Scholar
Ingenkamp, H. G. (1992a) ‘Plutarchs “Leben der Gracchen.” Eine Analyse’, ANRW II 33.6: 4298–346.Google Scholar
Ingenkamp, H. G. (1992b) ‘Plutarchs “Leben der Gracchen”. Eine Analyse’, ANRW II 33.6: 4424–44.Google Scholar
Iodice Di Martino, M. G. (1987) ‘Il rapporto oratore-pubblico nel Brutus di Cicerone’, Atene e Roma 32.3–4: 147–51.Google Scholar
Itgenshorst, T. (2005) Tota illa pompa: der Triumph in der römischen Republik. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (1995) Demokratie in Rom?: Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2000a) ‘Jovialität und Freiheit. Zur Institutionalität der Beziehungen zwischen Ober- und Unterschichten in der römischen Republik’, in Mos maiorum: Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik, eds. Linke, B. and Stemmler, M.. Stuttgart: 207–35.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2000b) ‘Rednertätigkeit und Statusdissonanzen in der späten römischen Republik’, in Rede und Redner: Bewertung und Darstellung in den antiken Kulturen, eds. Neumeister, C. and Raeck, W.. Möhnesee: 167–89.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2000c) ‘Caesar und die Krise von 47 v. Chr.’, in L’Ultimo Cesare: Scritti riforme progetti poteri congiure, ed. Urso, G.. Rome: 151–73.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2001) ‘Integrationsrituale in der römischen Republik. Zur einbindenden Wirkung der Volksversammlungen’, in Integrazione, mescolanza, rifiuto: Incontri di popoli, lingue e culture in Europa dall'Antichità all'Umanesimo, ed. Urso, G.. Rome: 89–113.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2006) ‘Who attended Roman assemblies? Some remarks on political participation in the Roman Republic’, in Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo, eds. Rodríguez, J. Remesal, Simón, F. Marco and Polo, F. Pina. Barcelona: 221–34.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2009) Der große Trend, der kleine Sachzwang und das handelnde Individuum: Caesar’s Entscheidungen. München.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2010a) ‘Der Dictator und die Republik. Wurzeln, Formen und Perspektiven von Caesars Monarchie’, in Zwischen Monarchie und Republik. Gesellschaftliche Stabilisierungsleistungen und politische Transformationspotentiale in den antiken Stadtstaaten, eds. Linke, B., Meier, M. and Strothmann, M.. Stuttgart: 187–211.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2010b) ‘Erfahrungsraum und Erwartungshorizont bei Julius Caesar’, in Cesare: precursore o visionario?, ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 311–32.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2010c) ‘Le système électoral des Romains et le désespoir des candidats’, Revue historique de droit français et étranger 87, 2009 [2010]: 495–513.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2010d) ‘Die Dominanz des Vorgangs über den Ausgang. Struktur und Verlauf der Wahlen in der römischen Republik’, in Technik und Symbolik vormoderner Wahlverfahren, eds. Dartmann, C., Wassilowsky, G. and Weller, T.. München: 17–34.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2011a) ‘Blaming the people in front of the people: restraint and outbursts of orators in Roman contiones’, in Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, eds. Smith, C. and Covino, R.. Swansea: 111–25.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2013) ‘Feeding the plebs with words: the significance of senatorial public oratory in the small world of Roman politics’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 49–62.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. and Pfeilschifter, R. (2006) Herrschaft ohne Integration? Rom und Italien in republikanischer Zeit. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. P. (1972–3) ‘Mark Antony: man of five families’, Journal of the Society of Ancient Numismatics 4: 21–2, 24.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. P. (2004) ‘The dilemma of Cicero’s speech for Ligarius’, in Cicero the Advocate, eds. Powell, J. G. F. and Paterson, J.. Oxford: 371–400.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, A. (2014) ‘Theophanes (188)’, in Brill’s New Jacoby, ed. Worthington, I., Brill Online: http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-jacoby/theophanes-188-a188Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W. (1980) Laudatio Funebris: Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Klodt, C. (1992) Ciceros Rede Pro Rabirio Postumo: Einleitung und Kommentar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kondratieff, E. J. (2003) ‘Popular power in action: tribunes of the plebs in the later Republic’, diss. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Kondratieff, E. J. (2009) ‘Reading Rome’s evolving civic landscape in context: tribunes of the plebs and the praetor’s tribunal’, Phoenix 63: 322–60.Google Scholar
Konrad, C. F. (1996) ‘Notes on Roman also-rans’, in Imperium sine fine: T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic, ed. Linderski, J.. Stuttgart: 103–43.Google Scholar
Koster, S. (1980) Die Invektive in der griechischen und römischen Literatur. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. (2005) ‘Hair, hegemony, and historiography: Caesar’s style and its earliest critics’, in Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose, eds. Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M. and Adams, J. N.. Oxford: 97–115.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. (2009) ‘Bellum Gallicum’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Chichester: 159–74.Google Scholar
Lafon, X. (2001) Villa Maritima. Recherches sur les villas littorales de l’Italie Romaine (IIIe siècle av. J.-C. / IIIe siècle ap. J.-C). Paris.Google Scholar
Lahusen, G. (1983) Untersuchungen zur Ehrenstatue in Rom: Literarische und epigraphische Zeugnisse. Rome.Google Scholar
Laser, G. (1997) Populo et scaenae serviendum est: Die Bedeutung der städtischen Masse in der Späten Römischen Republik. Trier.Google Scholar
Ledentu, M. (2000) ‘L’orateur, la parole et le texte’, in Orateurs, auditeurs, lecteurs: à propos de l’eloquence romaine à la fin de la République et au début du Principat, eds. Achard, G. and Ledentu, M.. Lyon: 57–73.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. (1982) ‘The technique of persuasion in Cicero’s Pro Murena’, in Éloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron. Entretiens Fondation Hardt 28, ed. Ludwig, W.. Genève: 193–236.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. (2001) ‘Julius Caesar, the orator of paradox’, in The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome: Essays in Honor of G. A. Kennedy, ed. Wooten, C. W.. Leiden: 97–110.Google Scholar
Lehmann, G. A. (2004) ‘Der Beginn der res gestae des Augustus und das politische exemplum des Cn. Pompeius Magnus’, ZPE 148: 151–62.Google Scholar
Libero, L. de (1992) Obstruktion: Politische Praktiken im Senat und in der Volksversammlung der ausgehenden römischen Republik (70–49 v. Chr.). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Liddell, H. G. and Scott, R. (1996) A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th edn. with suppl. Oxford.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1984) ‘Buying the vote: electoral corruption in the late Republic’, AncW 9: 87–94.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. and Kaminska-Linderski, A. (1974) ‘The quaestorship of Marcus Antonius’, Phoenix 28: 213–23.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. (1993) Imperium Romanum: Politics and Administration. London and New York.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. (1996) ‘Political history, 146–95 B.C.’, in The Cambridge Ancient History IX, 2nd edn, eds. Crook, J. A., Lintott, A. and Rawson, E.. Cambridge: 40–103.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. (1997) ‘Cassius Dio and the history of the late Roman Republic’, ANRW II 34.3: 2497–523.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. (2004) ‘Legal procedure in Cicero’s time’, in Cicero the Advocate, eds. Powell, J. G. F. and Paterson, J.. Oxford: 61–78.Google Scholar
Löfstedt, E. (1956) Syntactica: Studien und Beiträge zur historischen Syntax des Lateins I-II. Lund.Google Scholar
Lomanto, V. (1994–5) ‘Cesare e la teoria dell’eloquenza’, Memorie dell’Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 18–19: 3–127.Google Scholar
Long, J. (2006) ‘Julian Augustus’ Julius Caesar’, in Julius Caesar in Western Culture, ed. Wyke, M.. Malden and Oxford: 62–82.Google Scholar
Lossmann, F. (1957) ‘Zur literarischen Kritik Suetons in den Kapiteln 55 und 56 der Caesarvita’, Hermes 85: 47–58.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2008) ‘Cicero on Caesar or exemplum and inability in the Brutus’, in Vom Selbst-Verständnis in Antike und Neuzeit/Notions of the Self in Antiquity and Beyond, eds. Arweiler, A. and Möller, M.. Berlin and New York: 131–54.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1993) ‘Reading and response in the Dialogus’, in Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition, eds. Luce, T. J. and Woodman, A. J.. Princeton: 11–38.Google Scholar
Lundgreen, C. (2011) Regelkonflikte in der römischen Republik: Geltung und Gewichtung von Normen in politischen Entscheidungsprozessen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lyons, M. and Montgomery, H. C. (1968) ‘Friends, Romans, Countrymen’, CB 44: 37–9, 41.Google Scholar
McDermott, W. C. (1972) ‘Cicero’s publication of his consular speeches’, Philologus 116: 277–84.Google Scholar
McDonnell, M. (2011) ‘Virtus as a Specialization in the Middle Republic’, in Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana: Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, eds. Blösel, W. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. Stuttgart: 29–41.Google Scholar
Magnino, D. (1983) ‘La compositione del terzo libro delle Guerre Civili di Appiano’, in Saggi di letterature e storiografia antiche. Como: 99–132.Google Scholar
Mahy, T. (2013) ‘Antonius, triumvir and orator: career, style, and effectiveness’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 329–44.Google Scholar
Malcovati, E. (1976) Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta Liberae Rei Publicae, 4th edn. Torino.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2001) ‘Der Dichter Curiatius Maternus in Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus’, Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft 4: 1–20.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2006) ‘Ciceros Attacke gegen die Provinzverlosung unter Antonius (zu Cic. Phil. 3, 24–26)’, Klio 88: 167–80.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2012) ‘The speeches to the People in Cicero’s oratorical corpora’, Rhetorica 30: 153–75.Google Scholar
Marco Simón, F. (1996) Flamen Dialis: El sacerdote de Júpiter en la religión romana. Madrid.Google Scholar
Marco Simón, F. and Pina Polo, F. (2000a) ‘Mario Gratidiano, los compita y la religiosidad popular a fines de la república’, Klio 82: 154–70.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2000b) ‘Concordia y libertas como polos de referencia religiosa en la lucha política de la república tardía’, Gerión 18: 261–92.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2007) ‘Speeches in classical historiography’, in A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography I, ed. Marincola, J.. Oxford: 133–44.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2010) ‘The rhetoric of history: allusion, intertextuality, and exemplarity in historiographical speeches’, in Stimmen der Geschichte: Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie, ed. Pausch, D.. Berlin and New York: 259–89.Google Scholar
Martin, D. J. (1998) ‘Did Pompey engage in imitatio Alexandri?’, in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 9, ed. Deroux, C., Bruxelles: 23–51.Google Scholar
Martin, P. M. (2000) ‘Sur quelques thèmes de l’éloquence popularis, notamment l’invective contre la passivité du peuple’, in Orateurs, auditeurs, lecteurs: à propos de l’eloquence romaine à la fin de la République et au début du Principat, eds. Achard, G. and Ledentu, M.. Lyon: 37–41.Google Scholar
Matijević, K. (2006) Marcus Antonius: Consul, Proconsul, Staatsfeind: die Politik der Jahre 44 und 43 v. Chr. Rahden.Google Scholar
Matthews, C. J. (1996) Kennedy and Nixon: The Rivalry that Shaped Postwar America. New York.Google Scholar
Maurach, G. (2002) ‘Caesars Humor’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 26: 53–60.Google Scholar
May, J. M. (1988) Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill and London.Google Scholar
Meadows, A. and Williams, J. (2001) ‘Moneta and the monuments: coinage and politics in republican Rome’, JRS 91: 27–49.Google Scholar
Meier, C. (1966) Res publica amissa: eine Studie zu Verfassung und Geschichte der späten römischen Republik. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Meister, J. B. (2012) Der Körper der Princeps: Zur Problematik eines monarchischen Körpers ohne Monarchie. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Migone, A. (2012) ‘Addressing emergent charisma in Roman military leaders: triumphal practices in the republican period’, Journal of Classical Sociology 12: 43–68.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1984) ‘The political character of the classical Roman Republic 200–151 B.C.’, JRS 74: 1–19.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1986) ‘Politics, persuasion and the People before the Social War (150–90 B.C.)’, JRS 76: 1–11.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1941) Review of B. Farrington, Science and Politics in the Ancient World, JRS 31: 149–57.Google Scholar
Monterroso Checa, A. (2010) Theatrum Pompei: Forma y arquitectura de la génesis del modelo teatral de Roma. Madrid.Google Scholar
Moretti, G. (1995) Acutum dicendi genus: brevità, oscurità, sottogliezze e paradossi nelle traditioni retoriche degli stoici. Bologna.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (1997) ‘“Levi quidem de re ...”: Julius Caesar as tyrant and pedant’, JRS 87: 23–40.Google Scholar
Morrell, K. (forthcoming) ‘Cato, Pompey’s third consulship, and the politics of Milo’s trial’, in Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision, eds. van der Blom, H., Gray, C. and Steel, C.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2004) Mass Oratory and Political Power in the late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2007) ‘Caesar’s alleged fear of prosecution and his ratio absentis in the approach to the Civil War’, Historia 56: 159–78.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2009) ‘Dignitas and res publica: Caesar and republican legitimacy’, in Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise, ed. Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. München: 115–40.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2012) ‘Political graffiti in the late Roman Republic: hidden transcripts and common knowledge’, in Politische Kommunikation und öffentliche Meinung in der antiken Welt, ed. Kuhn, C.. Heidelberg: 191–17.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2013) ‘”Cultural hegemony” and the communicative power of the Roman elite’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 30–47.Google Scholar
Motzo, B. R. (1940) ‘Le contiones di M. Antonio e di M. Bruto dopo la morte di Cesare’, Studi di antichità classica offerti da colleghi e discepoli a Emanuele Ciaceri. Genova: 136–43.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (1998) Italian Unification: A Study in Ancient and Modern Historiography. London.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (2006) ‘Caius Gracchus and the cives sine suffragio’, Historia 55: 418–25.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (2008) ‘The Gracchi, the Latins, and the Italian allies’, in People, Land and politics: Democraphic Developments and the Transformation of Roman Italy, 300 bc–ad 14, eds. De Ligt, L. and Northwood, S. J.. Leiden: 471–83.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (2013) ‘From meeting to text: the contio in the late Republic’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 63–82.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. (2002) ‘Brutus: the history of Roman eloquence’, in Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J. M.. Leiden: 401–25.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. (2004) ‘Cicerone e il ‘dilemma’ di Gaio Gracco’, in Cicerone e i suoi interpreti: Studi sull’Opera e la Fortuna, ed. Narducci, E.. Pisa, 215–26.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. (1959) ‘Confusio Suffragiorum. À propos d’une réforme électorale de Caius Gracchus’, MEFRA 71: 145–210.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. (1977) ‘Les classes dirigeantes romaines sous la République. Ordre sénatorial et ordre équestre’, Annales (ESC) 32: 726–55.Google Scholar
Nippel, W. (2008) ‘Regel und Ausnahme in der römischen Verfassung’, in Christian Meier zur Diskussion, eds. Bernett, M., Nippel, W. and Winterling, A.. Stuttgart: 121–41.Google Scholar
North, J. A. (1990b) ‘Politics and aristocracy in the Roman Republic’, CPh 85: 277–87.Google Scholar
O’Neill, P. (2003) ‘Going round in circles: popular speech in ancient Rome’, Classical Antiquity 22: 135–66.Google Scholar
Östenberg, I. (2009) Staging the World: Spoils, Captives, and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession. Oxford.Google Scholar
Packer, J. E. (2006) ‘Digitizing Roman imperial architecture in the early 21st c.’, in Imaging Ancient Rome: Documentation – Visualization – Imagination, eds. Haselberger, L. and Humphrey, J.. JRA Suppl. 61: 309–20.Google Scholar
Packer, J. E. (2010) ‘Pompey’s theater and Tiberius’ Temple of Concord: a late republican primer for an early imperial patron’, in The Emperor and Rome: Space, Representation and Ritual, eds. Ewald, C. Björn and Noreña, F. Carlos. YCIS 35: 135–67.Google Scholar
Packer, J. E., Burge, J. and Gagliardo, M. C. (2007) ‘Looking again at Pompey’s theater: the 2005 excavation season’, AJA 111: 505–22.Google Scholar
Parker, V. (2007) ‘The annalists and Marius’ early career’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 31: 131–45.Google Scholar
Parker, V. (2011) ‘Die militärische Führungsschicht am Ende des 2. und zu Beginn des 1. Jahrhunderts v. Chr.’, in Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana: Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, eds. Blösel, W. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. Stuttgart, 43–54.Google Scholar
Paterson, J. (2009) ‘Caesar the man’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Chichester: 126–40.Google Scholar
Paul, G. M. (1984) A Historical Commentary on Sallust’s Bellum Jugurthinum. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Pausch, D. (2010) Stimmen der Geschichte: Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (1979) ‘Plutarch’s method of work in the Roman Lives’, JHS 99: 74–96 = Pelling (2002) 1–44.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (1980) ‘Plutarch’s adaptation of his source-material’, JHS 100: 127–40 = Pelling (2002) 91–116.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (1985) ‘Plutarch and Catiline’, Hermes 113: 311–29 = Pelling (2002) 45–64.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (1997) ‘Plutarch: Roman heroes and Greek culture’, in Philosophia Togata I: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, eds. Griffin, M. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 199–32.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (2000) ‘Rhetoric, paideia, and psychology in Plutarch’s Lives’, in Rhetorical Theory and Praxis in Plutarch: Acta of the IVth International Congress of the International Plutarch Society, ed. van der Stockt, L.. Louvain/Namur: 331–40 = Pelling (2002) 339–48.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (2006) ‘Breaking the bounds: writing about Julius Caesar’, in The Limits of Ancient Biography, eds. McGing, B. and Mossman, J.. Swansea: 255–80.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (2009) ‘The first biographers: Plutarch and Suetonius’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Chichester: 252–66.Google Scholar
Peterson, W. (1891) M. Fabi Quintiliani: Institutionis Oratoriae liber decimus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pétré, H. (1934) ‘Misericordia. Histoire du mot et l’idée du paganisme au christianisme’, REL 12: 376–89.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (1995) ‘Procedures and functions of civil and military contiones’, Klio 77: 203–16.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (1996) Contra arma verbis: Der Redner vor dem Volk in der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2010) ‘Frigidus rumor: the creation of a (negative) public image in Rome’, in Private and Public Lies: The Discourse of Despotism and Deceit in the Ancient World, eds. Turner, A. J., Chong-Gossard, K. O. and Vervaet, F. J.. Leiden and Boston: 75–90.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2011a) The Consul at Rome: The Civil Functions of the Consuls in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2011b) ‘Public speaking at Rome: a question of auctoritas’, in The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World, ed. Peachin, M.. Oxford: 286–303.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2012a) ‘Veteres candidati: losers in the elections in republican Rome’, in Vae victis! Perdedores en el mundo antiguo, eds. Simón, F. Marco, Polo, F. Pina and Rodríguez, J. Remesal. Barcelona: 63–82.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2012b) ‘Contio, auctoritas and freedom of speech in republican Rome’, in Rome, a City and its Empire in Perspective: The Impact of the Roman World through Fergus Millar’s Research, ed. Benoist, S.. Leiden: 45–58.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2013a) ‘Foreign eloquence in the Roman senate’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in the Roman Republic, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 247–66.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2013b) ‘The political role of the consules designati at Rome’, Historia 62: 420–52.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2015) ‘Magistrates-elect and their potestas contionandi in the late Roman Republic’, Historia 65: 66–72.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2010) ‘Court procedure and rhetorical strategy in Cicero’, in Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A.. Cambridge: 21–36.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2013) ‘The embassy of the three philosophers to Rome in 155 bc’, in Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change, eds. Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K.. Oxford: 219–47.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (1974a) Dignitatis contentio: Studien zur Motivation und politischen Taktik im Bürgerkrieg zwischen Caesar und Pompeius. München.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (1974b) ‘Zum politischen Wirken der caesarfreundlichen Volkstribunen am Vorabend des Bürgerkrieges’, Chiron 4: 293–326.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (2003) ‘Caesar the liberator? Factional politics, civil war, and ideology’, in Caesar against Liberty? Perspectives on his Autocracy, eds. Cairns, F. and Fantham, E.. Cambridge: 35–67.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (2009) ‘Bellum Civile’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Chichester: 175–91.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. (2010) ‘Creating a grand coalition of true Roman citizens: on Caesar’s political strategy in the Civil War’, in Citizens of Discord. Rome and Its Civil Wars, eds. Breed, B. W., Damon, C. and Rossi, A.. Oxford: 159–69.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. (1994) ‘The senate, Mark Antony, and Caesar’s legislative legacy’, CQ 44: 130–45.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. (1999) ‘Mithridates, the banner of Ch’in-Yu, and the comet coin’, HSPh 99: 197–253.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. (2001) ‘Did Mark Antony contemplate an alliance with his political enemies in July 44 B.C.E.?’, CPh 96: 253–68.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. (2004) ‘Did Julius Caesar temporarily banish Mark Antony from his inner circle?’, CQ 54. 161–73.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. (2007b) ‘Roman senatorial oratory’, in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, eds. Dominik, W. and Hall, J.. Oxford: 122–35.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. (2010) ‘Debate at a distance: a unique rhetorical strategy in Cicero’s Thirteenth Philippic’, in Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A.. Cambridge: 155–74.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, D. (1963) Caesars Commentarii: Stil und Stilwandel am Beispiel der direkten Rede. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1971) ‘Lucius Crassus and Cicero: the formation of a statesman’, PCPhS 17: 75–88 = Rawson, E. (1991) Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers, ed. Millar, F.. Oxford: 16–33.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1975b) ‘Caesar’s heritage: Hellenistic kings and their Roman equals’, JRS 65: 148–59.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1999) ‘Cicero’s head’, in Constructions of the Classical Body, ed. Porter, J. I.. Ann Arbor: 190–211.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (2002) ‘The Post reditum speeches’, in Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J. M.. Leiden: 159–96.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (2010) ‘Form as global strategy in Cicero’s Second Catilinarian’, in Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A.. Cambridge: 92–104.Google Scholar
Rispoli, G. M. (1996) ‘Le voci della retorica’, in Epicureismo greco e romano. Atti del congresso internazionale II, eds. Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M.. Napoli: 629–49.Google Scholar
Robb, M. A. (2010) Beyond Populares and Optimates. Political Language in the Late Republic. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Robinson, A. W. (1986) ‘Cicero’s use of people as exempla in his speeches’, Diss. Indiana University.Google Scholar
Robinson, A. W. (1994) ‘Cicero’s use of the Gracchi in two speeches before the people’, Atene e Roma 39: 71–6.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (1997) ‘Color-blindness: Cicero’s death, declamation, and the production of history’, CPh 92: 109–30.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (2012) ‘Cornelia: on making one’s name as mater Gracchorum’, working paper published on http://krieger.jhu.edu/classics/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2013/06/Mother-of-the-Gracchi.pdf.Google Scholar
Roselaar, S. T. (2010) Public Land in the Roman Republic: A Social and Economic History of Ager Publicus in Italy, 396–89 bc. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. (1990) Imperatores Victi: Military Defeat and Aristocratic Competition in the Middle and Late Republic. Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. (1993) ‘Competition and crisis in mid-republican Rome’, Phoenix 47: 313–38.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. (2006) ‘Aristocratic values’, in A Companion to the Roman Republic, eds. Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R.. Malden and Oxford: 365–82.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. (2007) ‘Military command, political power, and the republican elite’, in A Companion to the Roman Army, ed. Erdkamp, P.. Malden and Oxford: 132–47.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. (2011) ‘War, wealth and consuls’, in Consuls and res publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, eds. Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M. and Polo, F. Pina. Cambridge: 133–58.Google Scholar
Rosillo López, C. (2007) ‘“Temo a los troyanos”: rumores y habladurías en la Roma Tardorrepublicana’, Polis 19: 113–34.Google Scholar
Rosillo López, C. (2010) La corruption à la fin de la République romaine (IIe-Ier s. av. J.-C.): Aspects politiques et financiers. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rowe, G. (2002) Princes and Political Cultures: the new Tiberian Senatorial Decrees. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Russell, A. (2006) ‘The tribunate of the plebs between 121 and 71 bc’, unpublished M.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Russell, A. (2013) ‘Tribunician oratory and popular choice’, in Community and Communication. Oratory and Politics in the Roman Republic, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 101–15.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2008) Fasti Sacerdotum: A Prosopography of Pagan, Jewish, and Christian Religious Officials in the City of Rome, 300 bc to ad 499. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2011) The Roman Calendar from Numa to Constantine: Time, History and the Fasti. Chichester (transl. from German ed. Kalender und Öffentlichkeit: Die Geschichte der Repräsentation und religiösen Qualifikation von Zeit in Rom, Berlin, 1995.)Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. (2005) ‘The religious tradition of the Gracchi’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 7: 198–214.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. (2007a) ‘A survey of recent scholarship on the age of the Gracchi (1985–2005)’, Topoi (Lyon) 15.2: 465–510.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. (2013) Divination, Prediction and the End of the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E. (2007) ‘Roman oratory before Cicero: the Elder Cato and Gaius Gracchus’, in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, eds. Dominik, W. and Hall, J.. Oxford: 54–66.Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E. (2011) Cato the Censor and the Beginnings of Latin prose: From Poetic Translation to Elite Transcription. Columbus.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1997) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman world’, in Philosophia Togata I: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, eds. Griffin, M. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 97–119.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1965–70) Cicero’s Letters to Atticus I–VI + Indices. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1970) ‘The prosecution of Roman magistrates-elect’, Phoenix 24: 162–5.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1980) Cicero: Epistulae ad Quintum Fratrem et M. Brutum. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (2000) Valerius Maximus: Memorable Doings and Sayings. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (2002) Cicero: Letters to Quintus and Brutus, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (2009) Cicero: Philippics 1–6 and 7–14, rev. by Ramsey, J. T. and Manuwald, G.. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Schulz, R. (2011) ‘Rapaces magistratus? – Die Möglichkeiten der Statthalter zur Ausbeutung der Provinzen’, in Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana: Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, eds. Blösel, W. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. Stuttgart: 93–111.Google Scholar
Siani-Davies, M. (2001) Cicero: Pro Rabirio Postumo, with transl., comm. and introd. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sisani, S. (2015) L’ager publicus in età Graccana (133–111 a.C.): una rilettura testuale, storica e giuridica della lex agraria epigrafica. Rome.Google Scholar
Smethurst, S. E. (1960) ‘Mark Antony – reluctant politician’, Thought from the Learned Societies of Canada. Toronto: 155–70.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2009) ‘Sulla’s memoirs’, in The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography, eds. Smith, C. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 65–86.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2010) ‘Rhetorical history: the struggle of the orders in Livy’, in Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A.. Cambridge: 264–80.Google Scholar
Sordi, M. (1978) ‘La tradizione storiografica su Tiberio Sempronio Gracco e la propaganda contemporanea’, Sesta Miscellanea Greca e Romana. Rome: 299–330.Google Scholar
Sordi, M. (1984) ‘I maestri greci di Tiberio Gracco e la polemica antigraccana’, Sodalitas 1: 125–36.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (2003) ‘Cicero’s Brutus: the end of oratory and the beginning of history?’, BICS 46: 195–211.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (2007) ‘Lost orators of Rome’, in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, eds. Dominik, W. and Hall, J.. Oxford: 237–49.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (2009) ‘Friends, associates, and wives’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Chichester: 112–25.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (2010) ‘Tribunician sacrosanctity and oratorical performance in the late Republic’, in Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A.. Cambridge: 37–50.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (2012) ‘The Lex Pompeia de Provinciis of 52 B.C.: A Reconsideration’, Historia 61: 83–93.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (2013a) ‘Pompeius, Helvius Mancia, and the politics of popular debate’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 151–9.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (2013b) ‘Cicero, oratory and public life’, in The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, ed. Steel, C.. Cambridge: 160–70.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (2013c) ‘Structure, meaning and authority in Cicero’s dialogues’, in Der Dialog in der Antike: Formen und Funktionen einer literarischen Gattung zwischen Philosophie, Wissensvermittlung und dramatischer Inszenierung, eds. Föllinger, S. and Müller, G. M.. Berlin: 221–34.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (2013d) The End of the Roman Republic, 146–44 B.C.: Conquest and Crisis. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (2014) ‘The Roman senate and the post-Sullan res publica’, Historia 63: 323–39.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (forthcoming) ‘Forensic activity and senatorial careers at the end of the Republic’, in Cicero’s Law: Rethinking Roman Law in the Late Republic, ed. du Plessis, P., Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. (2013) ‘Marius, Sulla und der Kampf um den öffentlichen Raum’, Klio 95: 429–46.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. (1989) ‘Beobachtungen zu Ciceros philosophischem Standpunkt’, in Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos, eds. Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Steinmetz, P.. London: 1–22.Google Scholar
Stekelenburg, A. V. van (1976) ‘Lucan and Cassius Dio as heirs to Livy: the speech of Julius Caesar at Placentia’, AClass 19: 43–57.Google Scholar
Stem, R. (2005) ‘The first eloquent Stoic: Cicero on Cato the Younger’, CJ 101: 37–49.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T. and Wilson, M. (2007) Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric, and Ideology, Prudentia 37.Google Scholar
Stockton, D. (1991) From the Gracchi to Sulla: Sources for Roman History, 133–80 bc, Lactor 13. London.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1931) ‘Concordia Ordinum. Eine Untersuchung zur Politik Ciceros’, diss. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1975) Taxis und Taktik. Die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Strunk, T. E. (2010) ‘Offending the powerful: Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus and safe criticism’, Mnemosyne 63: 241–67.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (1996–7) ‘Vorliterarische römische Redner (bis zum Beginn des 2. Jhs. v. Chr.) in Ciceros ‘Brutus’ und in der historischen Überlieferung’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für Altertumswissenschaft 21: 169–98.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (1997) ‘Fehlende Redner in Cicero’s Brutus? Nebst Hinweisen auf fehlende Entwicklung, fehlende Belege und fehlende Ernsthaftigkeit in einer Geschichte der römischen Beredsamkeit’, in Vir bonus dicendi peritus: Festschrift für A. Weische zum 65. Geburtstag, eds. Czapla, B., Lehmann, T. and Liell, S.. Wiesbaden: 407–20.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (2001) ‘Die Vertreibung vor-ciceronischer Redner aus der römischen Literaturgeschichte’, WS 114: 169–82.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (2002) ‘Register der römischen Redner bis zum Tode Sullas’, in Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antike I: Die archaische Literatur: Von den Anfängen bis Sullas Tod, ed. Suerbaum, W.. München, 470–8.Google Scholar
Sumi, G. S. (2005) Ceremony and Power: Performing Politics in Rome between Republic and Empire. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Sumner, G. V. (1973) The Orators in Cicero’s Brutus. Prosopography and Chronology. Toronto.Google Scholar
Suolahti, J. (1955) The Junior Officers of the Roman Army in the Republican Period: A Study on Social Structure. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Sussman, L. A. (1994) ‘Antony as Miles Gloriosus in Cicero’s Second Philippic’, Scholia 3: 53–83.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1990a) ‘Plutarch’s Lives of Cicero, Cato, and Brutus’, Hermes 118: 192–203.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1990b) ‘Hellenic culture and the Roman heroes of Plutarch’, JHS 110: 126–45.Google Scholar
Swint, K. (2008) Dark Genius: The Influential Career of Legendary Political Operative and Fox News Founder Roger Ailes. New York.Google Scholar
Szemler, G. J. (1986) ‘Priesthoods and priestly careers in ancient Rome’, ANRW II 16.3: 2314–31.Google Scholar
Tan, J. (2011) ‘Competition between public and private revenues in Roman social and political history (200–49 B.C.)’, Diss. Columbia University.Google Scholar
Tan, J. (2013) ‘Publius Clodius and the boundaries of the contio’, in Community and Communication. Oratory and Politics in the Roman Republic, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 117–32.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, R. F. (2005) ‘What Caesar said: rhetoric and history in Sallust’s Coniuratio Catilinae 51’, in Roman Crossings: Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic, eds. Welch, K. and Hillard, T. W.. Swansea: 209–23.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (1991) ‘Cicero, the Elder Curio, and the Titinia case’, Mnemosyne 44: 364–71.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (1999) The Patrician Tribune. P. Clodius Pulcher. Chapel Hill and London.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (2007) ‘Alterum est tamen boni viri, alterum boni petitoris: The Good Man Canvasses’, Phoenix 61: 109–35.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (2010) ‘Why Parallel Lives?’, in Plutarch’s Lives: Parallelism and Purpose, ed. Humble, N.. Swansea: 1–22.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (2011) ‘The late Republic: autobiographies and memoirs in the age of the civil wars’, in Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity: A Brill Companion, ed. Marasco, G.. Leiden and Boston: 161–87.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (2013) ‘Campaign rhetoric’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in the Roman Republic, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 133–50.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1942a) ‘The election of the Pontifex Maximus in the late Republic’, CPh 37: 421–4.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1960) The Voting Districts of the Roman Republic: The Thirty-five Urban and Rural Tribes. Rome (updated re-issue by J. Linderski (2013). Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1966) Roman Voting Assemblies from the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Tellegen-Couperus, O. E. (2001) ‘The so-called consilium of the praetor and the development of Roman law’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 11: 11–20.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. (2011a) Cicero: Politics and Persuasion in Ancient Rome. London and New York.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. (2011b) ‘Combating the odium of self-praise: Cicero’s Divinatio in Caecilium’, in Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, eds. Smith, C. and Covino, R.. Swansea: 145–64.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. E. (1978) ‘To the senate and to the people: adaptation to the senatorial and popular audiences in the parallel speeches of Cicero’, Diss. Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Tiersch, C. (2009) ‘Politische Öffentlichkeit statt Mitbestimmung? Zur Bedeutung der contiones in der mittleren und späten römischen Republik’, Klio 91: 40–68.Google Scholar
Tiersch, C. (2013) ‘Ein Steintheater als Medium politischer Kommunikation? Das Pompeiustheater und der Wandel der politischen Kommunikation in Rom’, in Politische Kommunikation in Zeiten des Medienwandels (Media Convergence/Medienkonvergenz), eds. Roessing, T. and Podschuweit, N.. Berlin and New York: 221–56.Google Scholar
Timpe, D. (1996) ‘Memoria und Geschichtsschreibung bei den Römern’, in Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt: soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewusstsein, eds. Gehrke, H.-J. and Möller, A.. Tübingen: 277–99.Google Scholar
Toher, M. (2009) ‘Divining a lost text: Augustus’ autobiography and the ΒΙΟΣ ΚΑΙΣΑΡΟΣ of Nicolaus of Damascus’, in The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the development of Roman autobiography, eds. Smith, C. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 125–44.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, R. Y. and Purser, L. C. (1901–33) The Correspondence of Cicero I-VII. Dublin.Google Scholar
Vanderbroeck, P. J. J. (1987) Popular Leadership and Collective Behaviour in the Late Roman Republic (ca. 80–50 B.C.). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vanderspoel, J. (1985) ‘Gaius Gracchus and the census figure for 125/4 B.C.’, Échos du monde classique = Classical views 29: 101–6.Google Scholar
Vanggaard, J. H. (1988) The Flamen: A Study in the History and Sociology of Roman Religion. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. (1970) Triumphus: An Inquiry into the Origin, Development and Meaning of the Roman Triumph. Leiden.Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. J. (2009) ‘Pompeius’ career from 79 to 70 B.C.E: constitutional, political and historical considerations’, Klio 91: 406–34.Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. J. (2010) ‘Abrogating despotic power through deceit: the Pompeian model for Augustan dissimulatio’, in Private and Public Lies: The Discourse of Despotism and Deceit in the Ancient World, eds. Turner, A. J., Chong-Gossard, K. O. and Vervaet, F. J.. Leiden and Boston: 133–66.Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. J. (2014) The High Command in the Roman Republic: The Principle of the summum imperium auspiciumque from 509 to 19 BCE. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. (2000) ‘Rednergeschichte als Literaturgeschichte. Ciceros Brutus und die Tradition der Rede in Rom’, in Rede und Redner: Bewertung und Darstellung in den antiken Kulturen, eds. Neumeister, C. and Raeck, W.. Möhnesee: 207–26.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2013) ‘The genre of Cicero’s De consulatu suo’, in Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions and Transformations, eds. Papanghelis, T. D., Harrison, S. J. and Frangoulidis, S.. Berlin: 93–112.Google Scholar
Volk, K. and Zetzel, J. E. G. (2015) ‘Laurel, tongue and glory (Cicero, De consulatu suo Fr. 6 Soubiran)’, CQ 65: 204–23.Google Scholar
Wal, R. L. van der (2007) ‘”What a funny consul we have!” Cicero’s dealings with Cato Uticensis and prominent friends in opposition’, in Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond, ed. Booth, J.. Swansea: 183–205.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1957) Polybius I–III: A Historical Commentary on Polybius, vol. i. Oxford.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1967) Polybius I–III: A Historical Commentary on Polybius, vol. ii. Oxford.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1979) Polybius I–III: A Historical Commentary on Polybius, vol. iii. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1986) ‘Image and authority in the coinage of Augustus’, JRS 76: 66–87.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1988) ‘The social structure of the Roman house’, PBSR 56: 43–97 = in Hadrill, A. Wallace (1994) Houses and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton: 3–61.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1997) ‘Mutatio morum: the idea of a cultural revolution’, in The Roman Cultural Revolution, eds. Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A.. Cambridge: 3–22.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008a) ‘Housing the dead: the tomb as house in Roman Italy’, in Commemorating the Dead, eds. Brink, L. and Green, D.. Berlin and New York: 39–77.Google Scholar
Waller, M. (2011) ‘Victory, defeat and electoral success at Rome, 343–91 B.C.’, Latomus 70: 18–38.Google Scholar
Walter, U. (2010) ‘”Caesar macht Geschichte”: Memorialpolitik und Historiographie zwischen Konvention und Innovation’, in Cesare: precursore o visionario?, ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 159–73.Google Scholar
Ward, A. M. (1977) ‘Caesar and the pirates II: the elusive M. Iunius Iuncus and the year 75/4’, AJAH 2: 26–36.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. (2009) ‘Caesar and religion’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Chichester: 100–11.Google Scholar
Watkins, O. D. (1987) ‘Caesar solus? Senatorial support for the lex Gabinia’, Historia 36: 120–1.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, eds. Roth, G. and Wittich, C., trans. E. Fischoff et al, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Welch, K. E. (2009) ‘Alternative memoirs: tales from the ‘other side’ of the Civil War’, in The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography, eds. Smith, C. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 195–223.Google Scholar
Welch, K. E. (2012) ‘Dealing with Caesar: finding politics between 42 and 27 bc’, Antichthon 46: 126–49.Google Scholar
Welch, K. and Powell, A. (1998) Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments. Swansea.Google Scholar
Welch, K. and Mitchell, H. (2013) ‘Revisiting the Roman Alexander’, Antichthon 47: 80–100.Google Scholar
Wet, B. X. de (1990) ‘Contemporary sources in Plutarch’s Life of Antony’, Hermes 118: 80–90.Google Scholar
Weyssenhoff, C. (1970) ‘Ciceronis Epistularum Fragmenta. Wrocław, Warszawa and Krakow.Google Scholar
White, P. (1997) ‘Julius Caesar and the publication of acta in late republican Rome’, Chiron 27: 73–84.Google Scholar
White, P. (2009) ‘Bookshops in the literary culture of Rome’, in Ancient Literacies, eds. Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H.. New York: 269–87.Google Scholar
White, P. (2010) Cicero in Letters: Epistolary Relations in the Late Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wildberger, J. (2013) ‘Stertinian rhetoric: pre-imperial Stoic theory and practice of public discourse’, in Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change, eds. Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K.. Oxford: 249–75.Google Scholar
Wille, G. (1967) Musica Romana: Die Bedeutung der Musik im Leben der Römer. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Williamson, C. (2005) The Laws of the Roman People: Public Law in the Expansion and Decline of the Roman Republic. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. (1950) Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1987) ‘Conspicui postes tectaque digna deo: the public image of aristocratic and imperial houses in the late Republic and early Empire’, in L’Urbs. Espace urbain et histoire (Collection de l’école Française de Rome 98): 393–413.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1994a) ‘The senate and the populares, 69–60 B.C.’, in The Cambridge Ancient History IX, 2nd edn, eds. Crook, J. A., Lintott, A. and Rawson, E.. Cambridge: 327–67.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1994b) ‘Caesar, Pompey and Rome, 59–50 B.C.’, in The Cambridge Ancient History IX, 2nd edn, eds. Crook, J. A., Lintott, A. and Rawson, E.. Cambridge: 368–423.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1998) ‘The publication of the De bello Gallico’, in Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments, eds. Welch, K. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 1–9.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2009) Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. (1995) ‘Greeks, Romans, and the rise of Atticism’, in Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honour of D. M. Schenkeveld, eds. Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R. and Sluiter, I.. Amsterdam: 65–82.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. (2001) ‘Atticists, academics and epicureans: response to Robert Gaines’, in Cicéron et Philodème: La polémique en philosophie, eds. Avray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D.. Paris: 273–82.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. (2013) ‘The bad orator’, in Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in the Roman Republic, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 163–94.Google Scholar
Wistrand, M. (1979) Cicero Imperator: Studies in Cicero’s Correspondence 51–47 B.C. Göteborg.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1983) Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wylie, G. J. (1993) ‘P. Ventidius: from novus homo to “military hero”’, AClass 36: 129–41.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. (1999) Elections and Electioneering in Rome: A Study in the Political System of the Late Republic. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. (2004) ‘The People’s voice and the speakers’ platform: popular power, persuasion and manipulation in the Roman forum’, SCI 23: 201–12.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. (2009) ‘Public opinion, foreign policy and ‘just war’ in the late Republic’, in Diplomats and Diplomacy in the Roman World, ed. Eilers, C.. Leiden: 45–72.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. (2010) ‘Traditional political culture and the People’s role in the Roman Republic’, Historia 59: 282–302.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. (2014) ‘Marius speaks to the People: “new man”, Roman nobility and Roman political culture’, SCI 33: 283–300.Google Scholar
Yarrow, L. M. (2005) Historiography at the End of the Republic: Provincial Perspectives on Roman Rule. Oxford.Google Scholar
Yates, D. C. (2011) ‘The role of Cato the Younger in Caesar’s Bellum Civile’, CW 104: 161–74.Google Scholar
Zadoks-Josephus Jitta, A. N. (1932) Ancestral Portraiture in Rome and the Art of the Last Century of the Republic. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1995) The Mask of Socrates: The Image of the Intellectual in Antiquity, trans. A. Shapiro. Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford.Google Scholar
Zarmakoupi, M. (2014) Designing for Luxury on the Bay of Naples: Villas and Landscapes (c. 100 BCE–79 CE). Oxford.Google Scholar
Zinn, E. (1960) ‘Elemente des Humors in augusteischer Dichtung’, Gymnasium 67: 41–56, 152–5.Google Scholar
Zmeskal, K. (2009) Adfinitas: Die Verwandtschaften der senatorischen Führungsschicht der römischen Republik von 218–31 v. Chr. Passau.Google Scholar
Zwierlein-Diehl, E. (1973) ‘Gemmenbildnisse des M. Porcius Cato Uticensis’, Archäologischer Anzeiger (Deutsches Archäologisches Institut): 272–287.Google Scholar