Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- 1 Grade Retention
- 2 Research on Grade Repetition
- 3 Retainees in the “Beginning School Study”
- 4 Children's Pathways through the Elementary and Middle School Years
- 5 Characteristics and Competencies of Repeaters
- 6 Achievement Scores before and after Retention
- 7 Adjusted Achievement Comparisons
- 8 Academic Performance as Judged by Teachers
- 9 The Stigma of Retention
- 10 Retention in the Broader Context of Elementary and Middle School Tracking
- 11 Dropout in Relation to Grade Retention
- 12 The Retention Puzzle
- Appendix: Authors Meet Critics, Belatedly
- References
- Author Index
- Subject Index
2 - Research on Grade Repetition
Strong Opinions, Weak Evidence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- 1 Grade Retention
- 2 Research on Grade Repetition
- 3 Retainees in the “Beginning School Study”
- 4 Children's Pathways through the Elementary and Middle School Years
- 5 Characteristics and Competencies of Repeaters
- 6 Achievement Scores before and after Retention
- 7 Adjusted Achievement Comparisons
- 8 Academic Performance as Judged by Teachers
- 9 The Stigma of Retention
- 10 Retention in the Broader Context of Elementary and Middle School Tracking
- 11 Dropout in Relation to Grade Retention
- 12 The Retention Puzzle
- Appendix: Authors Meet Critics, Belatedly
- References
- Author Index
- Subject Index
Summary
The evidence is quite clear and nearly unequivocal that the achievement and adjustment of retained children are no better – and in most instances are worse – than those of comparable children who are promoted. Retention is one part of the current reform packages that does not work.
(Smith and Shepard 1987: 134)The evidence is extensive and unequivocal. It includes test scores, surveys, personality and emotional adjustment measures, case studies – everything from elaborate statistical analyses to asking students how they feel. Almost everything points in the same direction – retention is an extremely harmful practice.
(House 1989: 210)Those who continue to retain pupils at grade level do so despite cumulative research evidence that the potential for negative effects consistently outweighs positive outcomes … the burden of proof legitimately falls on proponents of retention plans to show there is compelling logic indicating success of their plans where so many other plans have failed.
(Holmes and Matthews 1984: 232)These are the voices, and the sentiment, most often encountered when the results of research on grade retention are distilled for general consumption. The judgments quoted reflect the point of view that prevailed in academic circles in the wake of the Excellence Commission's “back to basics” call for rigorous enforcement of high academic standards.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- On the Success of FailureA Reassessment of the Effects of Retention in the Primary School Grades, pp. 16 - 34Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002