Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:00:31.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section III - Pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Martin Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Botros Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Office Care of Women , pp. 105 - 150
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Finer, L, Henshaw, S. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006 Jun;38(2):90–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cullum, AS. Changing provider practices to enhance preconception wellness. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003 Jul 1;32(4):543–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K, Posner, SF, Biermann, J, et al.; CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group. Select Panel on Preconception Care. Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care – United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-6):123.Google ScholarPubMed
Frey, KA, Navarro, SM, Kotelchuck, M, Lu, MD. The clinical content of preconception care: preconception care for men. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008 Dec;199(6 Suppl 2):S389–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilcox, AJ, Dunson, D, Baird, DD. The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. BMJ 2000 Nov 18;321(7271):1259–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ylinen, K, Stenman, UH, Kesaniemi-Kuokkanen, T, Teramo, K. Risk of minor and major fetal malformations in diabetics with high haemoglobin A1c values in early pregnancy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Aug 11;289(6441):345–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wender-Ozegowska, E, Wroblewska, K, Zwiejska, A, et al. Threshold values of maternal glucose in early diabetic pregnancy – prediction of fetal malformations. Acta Obstet Gyneol Scand. 2005 Jan;84(1):1725.Google ScholarPubMed
Sibai, BM, Caritis, S, Hauth, J, et al. Risks of preeclampsia and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with pregestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000 Feb;182(2): 364–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, AH, Jamison, MG, Biswas, MS, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy: a United States population-based study. Circulation 2006;113:1564–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrer, RL, Sibai, BM, Mulrow, CD, et al. Management of mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy: a review. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;96(5, Part 2):S849–60.Google ScholarPubMed
August, P, Jeyabalan, A, Roberts, JM. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. In: Taylor, RN, Roberts, JM, Cunningham, FG (eds.). Chesley’s Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy. Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Working Group report on high blood pressure in pregnancy: report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:S122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry Steering Committee. Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry international interim report for 1 Jan 1989–31 July 2013. 2013. Available at www.APRegistry.com. Accessed December 15, 2014.Google Scholar
American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter: management issues for women with epilepsy (summary statement): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1998;41:994–98.Google Scholar
Randomized study of antiepileptic drug withdrawal in patients in remission. Lancet 1991; 337:1175–80.Google Scholar
Morrell, MJ. Guidelines for the care of women with epilepsy. Neurology 1998;51:S21–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frieder, A, Dunlop, AL, Culpepper, L, Bernstein, PS. The clinical content of preconception care: women with psychiatric conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199(6 Suppl 2):S328–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayslett, JP. Maternal and fetal complications in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Kidney Dis 1991;17(2):123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bobrie, G, Liote, F, Houillier, P, Grünfeld, JP, Jungers, P. Pregnancy in lupus nephritis and related disorders. Am J Kidney Dis 1987;9(4):339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber-Schoendorfer, C, Chambers, C, Wacker, E, et al. Pregnancy outcome after methotrexate treatment for rheumatic disease prior to or during early pregnancy: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014 May;66(5):1101–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dombrowski, MP. Asthma and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2006 Dec;108(6):1556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute). Working Group on Asthma and Pregnancy. Working Group report on managing asthma during pregnancy: recommendations for pharmacologic treatment. NIH publication 04–5236. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2005.Google Scholar
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel Report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2007.Google Scholar
Woodruff, TK. The Oncofertilty Consortium – addressing fertility in young people with cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010 7(8):466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonodotoxic therapies: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013 Nov;100(5):1224–31.Google Scholar
Ives, A, Saunder, C, Bulsara, M, Semmens, J. Pregnancy after breast cancer: population based study. BMJ 2007;334:194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lens, M, Bataille, V. Melanoma in relation to reproductive and hormonal factors in women: current review on controversial issues. Cancer Causes Control. 2008 Jun;19(5):437–42. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9110-4. Epub 2008 Jan 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, AS, Millar, LK, Koonings, PP, et al. Perinatal outcome in hypothyroid pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:349–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Davis, LE, Leveno, KJ, Cunningham, FG. Hypothyroidism complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:108–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Henrichs, J, Bongers-Schokking, JJ, Schenk, JJ, et al. Maternal thyroid function during early pregnancy and cognitive functioning in early childhood: the generation R study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Sep;95(9):4227–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callegari, LS, Sterling, LA, Zelek, ST, Hawes, SE, Reed, SD. Interpregnancy body mass index change and of term vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:330e1–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Landsberger, EJ, Gurewitsch, ED. Reproductive implications of bariatric surgery: pre- and postoperative considerations for extremely obese women of childbearing age. Curr Diab Rep 2007;7(4):281–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zollner, J, Curry, R, Johnson, M. The contribution of heart disease to maternal mortality. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013;25:91–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jungers, P, Chauveau, D, Choukroun, G, et al. Pregnancy in women with impaired renal function. Clin Nephrol 1997;47:281–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Lindheimer, MD, Katz, AI. Gestation in women with kidney disease: prognosis and management. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1994;8:387404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Maternal phenylketonuria. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 449. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1432–3.Google Scholar
Anderson, JA, Weitz, JI. Hypercoagulable states. Crit Care Clin 2011;27:933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frazer, KL, Porter, S, Goss, C. The genetics and implications of neuromuscular disease in pregnancy. J Perinat Neonat Nurs 2013;27(3):205–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Spong, CY. Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007;110:405–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duley, L, Henderson-Smart, DJ, Meher, S, King, JF. Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 Apr 18;2:CD004659.Google Scholar
Empson, M, Lassere, M, Craig, JC, Scott, JR. Recurrent pregnancy loss with antiphospholipid antibody: a systematic review of therapeutic trials. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:135–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Conde-Agudelo, A, Rosas-Bermúdez, A, Kafury-Goeta, AC, et al. Birth spacing and adverse pregnancy outcomes. JAMA 2006;295(15):1809–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Health & Human Services. www.hhs.gov/familyhistory. Accessed Jan 25, 2015.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Preconception and prenatal carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of Eastern European Jewish descent. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 442. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:950–3.Google Scholar
Bimla Schwarz, E, Postlewaite, DA, Hung, YY. Documentation of contraception and pregnancy when prescribing potentially teratogenic medications for reproductive-age women. Ann Int Med 2007;147(6):370–6.Google Scholar
Hook, EB, Cross, PK, Schreinemacher, D. Chromosomal abnormality rates at amniocentesis and in live-born infants. JAMA 1983;249(15):2034–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laopaiboon, M, Lumbiganon, P, Intarut, N, et al. Advanced maternal age and pregnancy outcomes: a multicountry assessment. BJOG 2014 Mar;121(Suppl 1):4956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, J. Older maternal age and pregnancy outcome: a review of the literature. Obstet & Gynecol Surv 1986 Nov;41(11):726–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sipos, A, Rasmussen, F, Harrison, G, et al. Paternal age and schizophrenia: a population based cohort study. BMJ 2004;329(7474):1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultman, CM, Sandin, S, Levine, SZ, et al. Advancing paternal age and risk of autism: new evidence from a population-based study and a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Molecular Psychiatry 2011;16:1203–12. doi:10.1038/mp.2010.121. Epub 2010 Nov 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. www.choosemyplate.gov/pregnancy-breastfeeding.html. Accessed Jan 21, 2015.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Neural tube defects. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 44. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:203–13. Reaffirmed 2014.Google Scholar
Rothman, KJ, Moore, LL, Singer, MR, et al. Teratogenicity of high vitamin A intake. N Engl J Med 1995 Nov 23;333(21):1369–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckman, CR, Beckman, CA. Effect of a structured antepartum exercise program on pregnancy and labor outcome in primaparas. J Reprod Med 1990;35:704–9.Google Scholar
Stamilio, DM, Chang, JJ, Macones, GA: Periodontal disease and preterm birth: do the data have enough teeth to recommend screening and preventive treatment? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:93–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michalowicz, BS, Hodges, JS, DiAngelis, AJ, et al. Treatment of periodontal disease and the risk of preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2006 Nov 2;355:1885–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazmararian, JA, Petersen, R, Spitz, AM, et al. Violence and reproductive health: current knowledge and future research directions. Matern Child Health J 2000;4(2):7984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings, NSDUH Series H-41, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 11–4658. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2011.Google Scholar
Patric, SW, Schumacher, RE, Benneyworth, BD, et al. Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated health care expenditures United States, 2000–2009. JAMA 2012;307(18):doi:10.1001/jama.2012.3951.Google Scholar
McDiarmid, MA, Gehle, K. Preconception brief: occupational/environmental exposures. Matern Child Health J 2006;10(5 Suppl):S123–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Environmental Working Group, Washington, DC. www.ewg.org/foodnew. Accessed Jan 25, 2015.Google Scholar
Gore, A. Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamanti-Kandarakis, E, Bourguignon, JP, Giudice, LC, et al. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocrine Reviews 2013;30(4):293342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CDC. Revised guidelines for HIV counseling, testing, and referral. MMWR 2001;50(RR-19):162.Google Scholar
Grosse, SD, Collins, JS. Folic acid supplementation and neural tube defect recurrence prevention. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2007 Nov;79(11):787–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coonrod, DV, Jack, BW, Boggess, KA, et al. The clinical content of preconception care: immunizations as part of preconception care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199(6 Suppl 2):S290–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Updated recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, diphtheria toxoid and acelluar pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in pregnant women. MMWR 2013 Feb 22;62(7):131–5.Google Scholar
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Updated recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in pregnant women and persons who have or anticipate having close contact with an infant aged <12 months. MMWR 2011 Oct 21;60(41):1424–6.Google Scholar

References

Curtin, SC, Abma, JC, Ventura, SJ, Henshaw, SK. Pregnancy rates for US women continue to drop. NCHS Data Brief 2013;136:18.Google Scholar
Wilcox, AJ, Weinberg, CR, O’Connor, JF, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1988;319:189–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Cintio, E, Parazzini, F, Rosa, C, et al. The epidemiology of gestational trophoblastic disease. Gen Diagn Pathol 1997;143:103–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ectopic pregnancy mortality – Florida, 2009–2010. MMWR. 2012;61:106–9.Google Scholar
Fuchs, N, Manoucheri, E, Verbaan, M, Einarsson, JI. Laparoscopic management of extrauterine pregnancy in caesarean section scar: description of surgical technique and review of the literature. BJOG 2014; doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13060. [Epub ahead of print]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ankum, WM, Mol, BW, Van der Veen, F, Bossuyt, PM. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1996;65:1093–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, C, Meng, CX, Zhao, WH, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with planned pregnancy: a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;181:176–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, LA, Khanlian, SA, Sutton, JM, et al. Accuracy of home pregnancy tests at the time of missed menses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:100–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bree, RL, Edwards, M, Bohm-Velez, M, et al. Transvaginal sonography in the evaluation of normal early pregnancy: correlation with hCG level. Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:75–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, I, Zimmer, EA, Tamir, A, et al. Evaluation of normal gestational sac growth: appearance of embryonic heartbeat and embryo body movements using transvaginal technique. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:885–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Chung, K, Chandavarkar, U, Opper, N, Barnhart, K. Reevaluating the role of dilation and curettage in the diagnosis of pregnancy of unknown location. Fert Steril 2011;96:659–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, E, Papageorghiou, AT, Conous, G, et al. The diagnostic effectiveness of an intial transvaginal scan in detecting ectopic pregnancy. Hum. Reprod 2007;22:2824–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, E. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Clinical Obstet Gynecol 2012;55:395401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doubilet, PM, Benson, CB, Bourne, T, Blaivas, M. Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1443–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pexsters, A, Luts, J, Van Schoubroeck, D, et al. Clinical implications of intra– and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal sonographic measurement of gestational sac and crown-rump length at 6–9 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:510–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanda, K, Lopea, LM, Grimes, DA, et al. Expectant care versus surgical treatment for miscarriage. Cochran Database Syst Rev 2012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003518.pub3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, JP, Gyte, GML, Hickey, M, et al. Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage. Cochran Database Syst Rev 2013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007223.pub3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonke, N, Leeman, LM. First-trimester surgical abortion technique. Obst Gynecol Clin North Am 2013;40:647–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Gemer, O, Segal, S, Kpomar, A, Sassoon, E. The current clinical presentation of complete molar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2000;264:33–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebire, NJ, Makrydimas, G, Agnantis, NJ, et al. Updated diagnostic criteria for partial and complete hydatidiform moles in early pregnancy. Anticancer Res 2003;23:1723–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Fowler, DJ, Lindsay, I, Seckl, MJ, Sebire, NJ. Histomorphometric features of hydatidiform moles in early pregnancy: relationship to detectability by ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29:7680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doll, KM1, Soper, JT. The role of surgery in the management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2013;68:533–42. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31829a82df.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lurain, JR. Gestational trophoblastic disease I: epidemiology, pathology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease, and management of hydatidiform mole. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:531–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nurmohamed, L, Moretti, ME, Schechter, T, et al. Outcome following high-dose methotrexate in pregnancies misdiagnosed as ectopic. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:533.e1–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condous, G, Kirk, E, Van Huffel, S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of varying discriminatory zones for the prediction of ectopic pregnancy in women with pregnancy of unknown location. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:770–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Mello, NM, Mol, F, Ankum, WM, et al. Ectopic pregnancy: how the diagnostic and therapeutic management has changed. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1066–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connolly, AM, Ryan, DH, Stuebe, AM, Wolfe, HM. Reevaluation of discriminatory and threshold levels for serum β-hCG in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:6570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadar, N, Caldwell, BV, Romero, R. A method of screening for ectopic pregnancy and its indications. Obstet Gynecol 1981;58:162–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Barnhart, K. Early pregnancy failure: beware the pitfalls of modern management. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1061–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 94: Medical management of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:1479–85.Google Scholar
Bachman, EA, Barnhart, K. Medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a comparison of regimens. Clinc Obstetr Gynecol 2012;55:440–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Mello, NM, Mol, F, Verhoeve, HR, et al. Methotrexate or expectant management in women with an ectopic pregnancy or pregnancy of unknown location and low serum hCG concentrations? A randomized comparison. Human Reproduction 2013;28: 60–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriques, SP, de Burlet, KJ, Hiemstra, E, et al. Ectopic pregnancy: when is expectant management safe? Gynecol Surg 2012;9:421–6.Google Scholar
De Bennetot, M, Rabischong, B, Aulet-Cuvelier, B, et al. Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population based study. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1271–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juneau, C, Bates, GW. Reproductive outcomes after medical and surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clinical Obstet Gynecol 2012;55:455–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaspan, D, Giraldo-Isaza, M, Dandolu, V, Cohen, AW. Compliance with methotrexate therapy for presumed ectopic in an inner-city population. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1122–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dueñas-Garcia, OF, Young, C, Mikhail, M, Salafia, C. Compliance with follow-up in an inner-city population treated with intramuscular methotrexate for suspected ectopic pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2012 Mar;120(3):254–6.Google Scholar

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pregnancy mortality surveillance system; 2013. Available from: www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pmss.html. Accessed December 5, 2015.Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Women’s health USA 2010. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2010. Available from: http://mchb.hrsa.gov/whusa10/hstat/mh/pages/237mm.html#footnote1. Accessed December 5, 2015.Google Scholar
Edwards, JE, Hanke, JC. An update on maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States. Nursing for women’s health. 2013;17(5):376–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Gabbe, SG. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2012: xvii, 1, 291.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care. 7th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL and Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2012: xiv, 580.Google Scholar
Phillippi, JC. Women’s perceptions of access to prenatal care in the United States: a literature review. Journal of midwifery & women’s health. 2009;54(3):219–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitworth, M, Bricker, L, Neilson, JP, Dowswell, T. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2010;4:CD007058.Google Scholar
Hardy, LM, Institute of Medicine (US), Committee on Prenatal and Newborn Screening for HIV Infection. HIV screening of pregnant women and newborns. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991: 146.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 60: Pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2005;105(3):675–85.Google Scholar
Dunne, F, Brydon, P, Smith, K, Gee, H. Pregnancy in women with type 2 diabetes: 12 years outcome data 1990–2002. Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2003;20(9):734–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 102: Management of stillbirth. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;113(3):748–61.Google Scholar
Preboth, M. ACOG guidelines on antepartum fetal surveillance. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. American family physician. 2000;62(5):1184, 7–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Sokol, RJ, Blackwell, SC, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Practice B-G. ACOG practice bulletin: Shoulder dystocia. Number 40, November 2002. (Replaces practice pattern number 7, October 1997). International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2003;80(1):8792.Google ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 597: Committee on Obstetric Practice: Labor induction or augmentation and autism. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;123(5):1140–2.Google Scholar
MacDorman, MF, Kirmeyer, SE, Wilson, EC. Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2006. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. 2012;60(8):122.Google Scholar
Creasy, RK, Resnik, R, Greene, MF, et al. Creasy and Resnik’s maternal-fetal medicine: principles and practice. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2014.Google Scholar
Berghella, V. Preterm birth: prevention and management. Chichester, West Sussex; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meis, PJ, Klebanoff, M, Thom, E, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;348(24):2379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J, Hankins, G, Iams, JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;201(4):375.e18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Collaborating Centre for Women and Children’s Health. Diabetes in pregnancy management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. NICE Guideline No. 3. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2015 Feb 25.Google Scholar
ACOG Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2013: 4751.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 518: Intimate partner violence. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;119(2 p. 1):412–17.Google Scholar
Workowski, KA, Berman, S, CDC. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR recomm rep. 2010 Dec 17;59(RR-12):1110.Google ScholarPubMed
WHO. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 86: Viral hepatitis in pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2007;110(4):941–56.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 131: Screening for cervical cancer. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;120(5):1222–38.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 140: Management of abnormal cervical cancer screening test results and cervical cancer precursors. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;122(6):1338–67.Google Scholar
House, TE, Williams, BL Jr., Meares, GM, Hester, LL Jr. Pregnancy complicated by urinary tract infections. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1969;34(5):670–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Merkatz, IR, Nitowsky, HM, Macri, JN, Johnson, WE. An association between low maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and fetal chromosomal abnormalities. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1984;148(7):886–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wald, NJ, Cuckle, HS, Densem, JW, et al. Maternal serum screening for Down’s syndrome in early pregnancy. BMJ. 1988;297(6653):883–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renier, MA, Vereecken, A, Van Herck, E, et al. Second trimester maternal dimeric inhibin-A in the multiple-marker screening test for Down’s syndrome. Human reproduction. 1998;13(3):744–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, LA, Shahabi, S, Oz, UA, et al. Hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin (invasive trophoblast antigen) immunoassay: a new basis for gestational Down syndrome screening. Clinical chemistry. 1999;45(12):2109–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wapner, RJ. First trimester aneuploidy screening: results of the NICHD multi-center study. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2002;185(S70).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunstan, FD, Nix, AB. Screening for Down’s syndrome: the effect of test date on the detection rate. Annals of clinical biochemistry. 1998;35(Pt 1):5761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, TM, Wapner, RJ. Integrated screening for Down’s syndrome. The New England journal of medicine. 1999;341(25):1935; author reply 6.Google ScholarPubMed
Rhoads, GG, Jackson, LG, Schlesselman, SE, et al. The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities. The New England journal of medicine. 1989;320(10):609–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saura, R, Gauthier, B, Taine, L, et al. Operator experience and fetal loss rate in transabdominal CVS. Prenatal diagnosis. 1994;14(1):70–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odibo, AO, Gray, DL, Dicke, JM, et al. Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis: a single center’s 16-year experience. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2008;111(3):589–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, DW, Platt, LD, Goldberg, JD, et al. Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;119(5):890901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 545: Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;120(6):1532–4.Google Scholar
Crane, JP, LeFevre, ML, Winborn, RC, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses. The RADIUS Study Group. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1994;171(2):392–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyberg, DA, Souter, VL, El-Bastawissi, A, et al. Isolated sonographic markers for detection of fetal Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. Journal of ultrasound in medicine: official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2001;20(10):1053–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, MW, Coustan, DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1982;144(7):768–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coustan, DR. Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Seminars in perinatology. 1994;18(5):407–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Iams, JD, Goldenberg, RL, Meis, PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. The New England journal of medicine. 1996;334(9):567–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romero, R, Nicolaides, K, Conde-Agudelo, A, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;206(2):124.e119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahill, AG, Odibo, AO, Caughey, AB, et al. Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;202(6):548.e18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colin, Y, Cherif-Zahar, B, Le Van Kim, C, et al. Genetic basis of the RhD-positive and RhD-negative blood group polymorphism as determined by Southern analysis. Blood. 1991;78(10):2747–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 485: Prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2011;117(4):1019–27.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 145: Antepartum fetal surveillance. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;124(1):182–92.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;114(2 Pt 1):386–97.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 561: Nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;121(4):911–15.Google Scholar
Towers, CV, Freeman, RK, Nageotte, MP, et al. The case for amniocentesis for fetal lung maturity in late-preterm and early-term gestations. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;210(2):95–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 559: Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;121(4):904–7.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 146: Management of late-term and postterm pregnancies. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2014;124(2 Pt 1):390–6.Google Scholar

References

Finer, LB, Zolna, MR. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception 2011 Nov;84(5):478–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Unintended Pregnancy, 1995.Google Scholar
Jones, RK, Kavanaugh, ML. Changes in abortion rates between 2000 and 2008 and lifetime incidence of abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2011 Jun;117(6):1358–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finer, LB, Zolna, MR. Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001–2008. Am J Public Health 2014 Feb;104(Suppl 1):S43–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pazol, K, Creanga, AA, Burley, KD, et al. Abortion surveillance – United States, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ 2013 Nov 29;62(8):144.Google ScholarPubMed
Barber, JS, Axinn, WG, Thornton, A. Unwanted childbearing, health, and mother-child relationships. J Health Soc Behav 1999 Sep;40(3):231–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonfeld, A, Kost, K. Public Costs from Unintended Pregnancies and the Role of Public Insurance Programs in Paying for Pregnancy and Infant Care: Estimates for 2008. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2013.Google Scholar
Peipert, JF, Madden, T, Allsworth, JE, Secura, GM. Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2012 Dec;120(6):1291–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedgh, G, Singh, S, Shah, IH, et al. Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008. Lancet 2012 Feb 18;379(9816):625–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, RK, Zolna, MR, Henshaw, SK, Finer, LB. Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2008 Mar;40(1):616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, RK, Jerman, J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014 Mar;46(1):314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerman, J, Jones, RK. Secondary measures of access to abortion services in the United States, 2011 and 2012: gestational age limits, cost, and harassment. Womens Health Issues 2014 Jul–Aug;24(4):e41924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boonstra, HD, Nash, E. A Surge of State Abortion Restrictions Puts Providers – and the Women They Serve – in the Crosshairs. Guttmacher Policy Review 2014;17(1):915.Google Scholar
Creinin, MD. Randomized comparison of efficacy, acceptability and cost of medical versus surgical abortion. Contraception 2000 Sep;62(3):117–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins – Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 143: Medical management of first-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2014 Mar;123(3):676–92.Google Scholar
Rorbye, C, Norgaard, M, Nilas, L. Medical versus surgical abortion: comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study. Hum Reprod 2005 Mar;20(3):834–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henshaw, RC, Naji, SA, Russell, IT, Templeton, AA. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women’s preferences and acceptability of treatment. BMJ 1993 Sep 18;307(6906):714–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, H, Perrucci, A, Barar, R, et al. Patient education and emotional support practices in abortion care facilities in the United States. Womens Health Issues 2012 Jul–Aug;22(4):e35964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guiahi, M, Davis, A, Society of Family Planning. First-trimester abortion in women with medical conditions. Contraception 2012 Dec;86(6):622–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartlett, LA, Berg, CJ, Shulman, HB, et al. Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2004 Apr;103(4):729–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulier, R, Kapp, N. Comprehensive analysis of the use of pre-procedure ultrasound for first- and second-trimester abortion. Contraception 2011 Jan; 83(1):30–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connell, K, Jones, HE, Simon, M, et al. First-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members. Contraception 2009 May;79(5):385–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Lichtenberg, ES, Paul, M, Society of Family Planning. Surgical abortion prior to 7 weeks of gestation. Contraception 2013 Jul;88(1):717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, J, Carson, SA. New technologies permit safe abortion at less than six weeks’ gestation and provide timely detection of ectopic gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997 May;176(5):1101–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Hertzen, H, Huong, NT, Piaggio, G, et al. Misoprostol dose and route after mifepristone for early medical abortion: a randomised controlled noninferiority trial. BJOG 2010 Sep;117(10):1186–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creinin, MD, Fox, MC, Teal, S, et al. A randomized comparison of misoprostol 6 to 8 hours versus 24 hours after mifepristone for abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):851–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winikoff, B, Dzuba, IG, Chong, E, et al. Extending outpatient medical abortion services through 70 days of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 2012 Nov;120(5):1070–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossman, D, Grindlay, K. Alternatives to ultrasound for follow-up after medication abortion: a systematic review. Contraception 2011 Jun;83(6):504–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, W, Bracken, H, Tanenhaus, J, et al. Alternatives to a routine follow-up visit for early medical abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2010 Feb;115(2 Pt 1):264–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dayananda, I, Maurer, R, Fortin, J, Goldberg, AB. Medical abortion follow-up with serum human chorionic gonadotropin compared with ultrasonography: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013 Mar;121(3):607–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, AL, Bhatnagar, J, Reagan, S, et al. Toxic shock associated with Clostridium sordellii and Clostridium perfringens after medical and spontaneous abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2007 Nov;110(5):1027–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeves, MF, Kudva, A, Creinin, MD. Medical abortion outcomes after a second dose of misoprostol for persistent gestational sac. Contraception 2008 Oct; 78(4):332–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, ST, Harvey, SM, Beckman, LJ, et al. Similarities in women’s perceptions and acceptability of manual vacuum aspiration and electric vacuum aspiration for first trimester abortion. Contraception 2003 Mar;67(3):207–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulier, R, Fekih, A, Hofmeyr, GJ, Campana, A. Surgical methods for first trimester termination of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;4:CD002900.Google Scholar
Allen, RH, Goldberg, AB, Board of Society of Family Planning. Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception 2007 Aug;76(2):139–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Kapp, N, Lohr, PA, Ngo, TD, Hayes, JL. Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010 Feb 17;2:CD007207.Google Scholar
Achilles, SL, Reeves, MF, Society of Family Planning. Prevention of infection after induced abortion: release date October 2010: SFP guideline 20102. Contraception 2011 Apr;83(4):295309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weitz, TA, Taylor, D, Desai, S, et al. Safety of aspiration abortion performed by nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and physician assistants under a California legal waiver. Am J Public Health 2013 Mar;103(3):454–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerns, J, Steinauer, J. Management of postabortion hemorrhage: release date November 2012 SFP Guideline #20131. Contraception 2013 Mar;87(3):331–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, E, Kapp, N. Pain control in first-trimester and second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a systematic review. Contraception 2011 Feb;83(2):116–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avraham, S, Gat, I, Duvdevani, NR, et al. Pre-emptive effect of ibuprofen versus placebo on pain relief and success rates of medical abortion: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril 2012 Mar;97(3):612–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, EG, Weaver, MA, Louie, KS, et al. Prophylactic compared with therapeutic ibuprofen analgesia in first-trimester medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013 Sep;122(3):558–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renner, RM, Jensen, JT, Nichols, MD, Edelman, AB. Pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Contraception 2010 May;81(5):372–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renner, RM, Nichols, MD, Jensen, JT, et al. Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012 May;119(5):1030–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suprapto, K, Reed, S. Naproxen sodium for pain relief in first-trimester abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984 Dec 15;150(8):1000–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braaten, KP, Hurwitz, S, Fortin, J, Goldberg, AB. Intramuscular ketorolac versus oral ibuprofen for pain relief in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception 2014 Feb;89(2):116–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Micks, EA, Edelman, AB, Renner, RM, et al. Hydrocodone-acetaminophen for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012 Nov;120(5):1060–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, RH, Kumar, D, Fitzmaurice, G, et al. Pain management of first-trimester surgical abortion: effects of selection of local anesthesia with and without lorazepam or intravenous sedation. Contraception 2006 Nov;74(5):407–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, N, Mueller, M, Van Vliet, HA, Kapp, N. Perioperative antibiotics to prevent infection after first-trimester abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 Mar 14;3:CD005217.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins – Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 104: antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2009 May;113(5):1180–9.Google Scholar
Fjerstad, M, Trussell, J, Sivin, I, et al. Rates of serious infection after changes in regimens for medical abortion. N Engl J Med 2009 Jul 9;361(2):145–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trussell, J, Nucatola, D, Fjerstad, M, Lichtenberg, ES. Reduction in infection-related mortality since modifications in the regimen of medical abortion. Contraception 2014 Mar;89(3):193–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winner, B, Peipert, JF, Zhao, Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012 May 24;366(21):19982007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okusanya, BO, Oduwole, O, Effa, EE. Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 Jul 28;7:CD001777.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Pregnancy
  • Edited by Martin Olsen, East Tennessee State University, Botros Rizk, University of South Alabama
  • Book: Office Care of Women
  • Online publication: 05 May 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316084380.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Pregnancy
  • Edited by Martin Olsen, East Tennessee State University, Botros Rizk, University of South Alabama
  • Book: Office Care of Women
  • Online publication: 05 May 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316084380.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Pregnancy
  • Edited by Martin Olsen, East Tennessee State University, Botros Rizk, University of South Alabama
  • Book: Office Care of Women
  • Online publication: 05 May 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316084380.011
Available formats
×