Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:12:42.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 13 - Pregnancy termination

from Section III - Pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

By
Jennifer Lesko  and
Kari Braaten
Edited by
Martin Olsen  and
Botros Rizk
Martin Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Botros Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Office Care of Women , pp. 139 - 150
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Finer, LB, Zolna, MR. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception 2011 Nov;84(5):478–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Unintended Pregnancy, 1995.Google Scholar
Jones, RK, Kavanaugh, ML. Changes in abortion rates between 2000 and 2008 and lifetime incidence of abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2011 Jun;117(6):1358–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finer, LB, Zolna, MR. Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001–2008. Am J Public Health 2014 Feb;104(Suppl 1):S43–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pazol, K, Creanga, AA, Burley, KD, et al. Abortion surveillance – United States, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ 2013 Nov 29;62(8):1–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Barber, JS, Axinn, WG, Thornton, A. Unwanted childbearing, health, and mother-child relationships. J Health Soc Behav 1999 Sep;40(3):231–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonfeld, A, Kost, K. Public Costs from Unintended Pregnancies and the Role of Public Insurance Programs in Paying for Pregnancy and Infant Care: Estimates for 2008. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2013.Google Scholar
Peipert, JF, Madden, T, Allsworth, JE, Secura, GM. Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2012 Dec;120(6):1291–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedgh, G, Singh, S, Shah, IH, et al. Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008. Lancet 2012 Feb 18;379(9816):625–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, RK, Zolna, MR, Henshaw, SK, Finer, LB. Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2008 Mar;40(1):6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, RK, Jerman, J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014 Mar;46(1):3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerman, J, Jones, RK. Secondary measures of access to abortion services in the United States, 2011 and 2012: gestational age limits, cost, and harassment. Womens Health Issues 2014 Jul–Aug;24(4):e419–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boonstra, HD, Nash, E. A Surge of State Abortion Restrictions Puts Providers – and the Women They Serve – in the Crosshairs. Guttmacher Policy Review 2014;17(1):9–15.Google Scholar
Creinin, MD. Randomized comparison of efficacy, acceptability and cost of medical versus surgical abortion. Contraception 2000 Sep;62(3):117–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins – Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 143: Medical management of first-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2014 Mar;123(3):676–92.Google Scholar
Rorbye, C, Norgaard, M, Nilas, L. Medical versus surgical abortion: comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study. Hum Reprod 2005 Mar;20(3):834–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henshaw, RC, Naji, SA, Russell, IT, Templeton, AA. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women’s preferences and acceptability of treatment. BMJ 1993 Sep 18;307(6906):714–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, H, Perrucci, A, Barar, R, et al. Patient education and emotional support practices in abortion care facilities in the United States. Womens Health Issues 2012 Jul–Aug;22(4):e359–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guiahi, M, Davis, A, Society of Family Planning. First-trimester abortion in women with medical conditions. Contraception 2012 Dec;86(6):622–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartlett, LA, Berg, CJ, Shulman, HB, et al. Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2004 Apr;103(4):729–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulier, R, Kapp, N. Comprehensive analysis of the use of pre-procedure ultrasound for first- and second-trimester abortion. Contraception 2011 Jan; 83(1):30–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connell, K, Jones, HE, Simon, M, et al. First-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members. Contraception 2009 May;79(5):385–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Lichtenberg, ES, Paul, M, Society of Family Planning. Surgical abortion prior to 7 weeks of gestation. Contraception 2013 Jul;88(1):7–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, J, Carson, SA. New technologies permit safe abortion at less than six weeks’ gestation and provide timely detection of ectopic gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997 May;176(5):1101–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Hertzen, H, Huong, NT, Piaggio, G, et al. Misoprostol dose and route after mifepristone for early medical abortion: a randomised controlled noninferiority trial. BJOG 2010 Sep;117(10):1186–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creinin, MD, Fox, MC, Teal, S, et al. A randomized comparison of misoprostol 6 to 8 hours versus 24 hours after mifepristone for abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):851–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winikoff, B, Dzuba, IG, Chong, E, et al. Extending outpatient medical abortion services through 70 days of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 2012 Nov;120(5):1070–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossman, D, Grindlay, K. Alternatives to ultrasound for follow-up after medication abortion: a systematic review. Contraception 2011 Jun;83(6):504–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, W, Bracken, H, Tanenhaus, J, et al. Alternatives to a routine follow-up visit for early medical abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2010 Feb;115(2 Pt 1):264–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dayananda, I, Maurer, R, Fortin, J, Goldberg, AB. Medical abortion follow-up with serum human chorionic gonadotropin compared with ultrasonography: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013 Mar;121(3):607–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, AL, Bhatnagar, J, Reagan, S, et al. Toxic shock associated with Clostridium sordellii and Clostridium perfringens after medical and spontaneous abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2007 Nov;110(5):1027–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeves, MF, Kudva, A, Creinin, MD. Medical abortion outcomes after a second dose of misoprostol for persistent gestational sac. Contraception 2008 Oct; 78(4):332–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, ST, Harvey, SM, Beckman, LJ, et al. Similarities in women’s perceptions and acceptability of manual vacuum aspiration and electric vacuum aspiration for first trimester abortion. Contraception 2003 Mar;67(3):207–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulier, R, Fekih, A, Hofmeyr, GJ, Campana, A. Surgical methods for first trimester termination of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;4:CD002900.Google Scholar
Allen, RH, Goldberg, AB, Board of Society of Family Planning. Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception 2007 Aug;76(2):139–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Kapp, N, Lohr, PA, Ngo, TD, Hayes, JL. Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010 Feb 17;2:CD007207.Google Scholar
Achilles, SL, Reeves, MF, Society of Family Planning. Prevention of infection after induced abortion: release date October 2010: SFP guideline 20102. Contraception 2011 Apr;83(4):295–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weitz, TA, Taylor, D, Desai, S, et al. Safety of aspiration abortion performed by nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and physician assistants under a California legal waiver. Am J Public Health 2013 Mar;103(3):454–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerns, J, Steinauer, J. Management of postabortion hemorrhage: release date November 2012 SFP Guideline #20131. Contraception 2013 Mar;87(3):331–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, E, Kapp, N. Pain control in first-trimester and second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a systematic review. Contraception 2011 Feb;83(2):116–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avraham, S, Gat, I, Duvdevani, NR, et al. Pre-emptive effect of ibuprofen versus placebo on pain relief and success rates of medical abortion: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril 2012 Mar;97(3):612–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, EG, Weaver, MA, Louie, KS, et al. Prophylactic compared with therapeutic ibuprofen analgesia in first-trimester medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013 Sep;122(3):558–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renner, RM, Jensen, JT, Nichols, MD, Edelman, AB. Pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Contraception 2010 May;81(5):372–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renner, RM, Nichols, MD, Jensen, JT, et al. Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012 May;119(5):1030–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suprapto, K, Reed, S. Naproxen sodium for pain relief in first-trimester abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984 Dec 15;150(8):1000–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braaten, KP, Hurwitz, S, Fortin, J, Goldberg, AB. Intramuscular ketorolac versus oral ibuprofen for pain relief in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception 2014 Feb;89(2):116–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Micks, EA, Edelman, AB, Renner, RM, et al. Hydrocodone-acetaminophen for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012 Nov;120(5):1060–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, RH, Kumar, D, Fitzmaurice, G, et al. Pain management of first-trimester surgical abortion: effects of selection of local anesthesia with and without lorazepam or intravenous sedation. Contraception 2006 Nov;74(5):407–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, N, Mueller, M, Van Vliet, HA, Kapp, N. Perioperative antibiotics to prevent infection after first-trimester abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 Mar 14;3:CD005217.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins – Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 104: antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2009 May;113(5):1180–9.Google Scholar
Fjerstad, M, Trussell, J, Sivin, I, et al. Rates of serious infection after changes in regimens for medical abortion. N Engl J Med 2009 Jul 9;361(2):145–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trussell, J, Nucatola, D, Fjerstad, M, Lichtenberg, ES. Reduction in infection-related mortality since modifications in the regimen of medical abortion. Contraception 2014 Mar;89(3):193–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winner, B, Peipert, JF, Zhao, Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012 May 24;366(21):1998–2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okusanya, BO, Oduwole, O, Effa, EE. Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 Jul 28;7:CD001777.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×