Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:35:39.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Article 3 - Sanctions

from Part II - Commentary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Peter J. Cullen
Affiliation:
European Court of Justice, Luxembourg
Mark Pieth
Affiliation:
Universität Basel, Switzerland
Lucinda A. Low
Affiliation:
Steptoe and Johnson LLP
Nicola Bonucci
Affiliation:
OECD
Get access

Summary

Sanctions

The bribery of a foreign public official shall be punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties. The range of penalties shall be comparable to that applicable to the bribery of the Party's own public officials and shall, in the case of natural persons, include deprivation of liberty sufficient to enable effective mutual legal assistance and extradition.

In the event that, under the legal system of a Party, criminal responsibility is not applicable to legal persons, that Party shall ensure that legal persons shall be subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive non-criminal sanctions, including monetary sanctions, for bribery of foreign public officials.

Each Party shall take such measures as may be necessary to provide that the bribe and the proceeds of the bribery of a foreign public official, or property the value of which corresponds to that of such proceeds, are subject to seizure and confiscation or that monetary sanctions of comparable effect are applicable.

Each Party shall consider the imposition of additional civil or administrative sanctions upon a person subject to sanctions for the bribery of a foreign public official.

Type
Chapter
Information
The OECD Convention on Bribery
A Commentary
, pp. 252 - 304
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiolfi, G. and Pieth, M. (2002), ‘How to Make a Convention Work: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Recommendation and Convention on Bribery as an Example of a New Horizon in International Law’ in Fijnaut, C. and Huberts, L. (eds.), Corruption, Integrity and Law Enforcement, Leiden/Boston, 349Google Scholar
Arnull, A. M., Dashwood, A. A., Ross, M. G. and Wyatt, D. A. (2000), Wyatt and Dashwood's European Union Laws, 4th edn, LondonGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, A. (2002), ‘Sentencing’ in Maguire, M., Morgan, R. and Reiner, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford, 1076Google Scholar
Baker, E. (2013), ‘Sentencing Guidelines and European Union Law’ in Ashworth, A. and Roberts, J. V. (eds.), Sentencing Guidelines: Exploring the English Model, Oxford, 254Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. (1988), Über Verbrechen und Strafen (nach der Ausgabe von 1766 übersetzt und herausgegeben von W. Alff), Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, P. (ed.) (2000), Responding to Corruption: Social Defence, Corruption, and the Protection of Public Administration and the Independence of Justice, updated documents of the XIIIth International Congress on Social Defence, Lecce, Italy 1996, NaplesGoogle Scholar
Boch, C. (2000), EC Law in the UK, LondonGoogle Scholar
Chilton, B. (2005), ‘Supreme Court Strikes Down Federal Sentencing Guidelines’, Compliance Week: Columns and Editorials, January 2005
Cole, G. F. (1995), The American System of Criminal Justice, 7th edn, BelmontGoogle Scholar
Connor, J. (2006), ‘Effectiveness of Antitrust Sanctions on Modern International Cartels’, 6 Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (1995), EC Law: Text, Cases and Materials, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Craufurd Smith, R. (1999), ‘Remedies for Breaches of EC Law in National Courts: Legal Variation and Selection’ in Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford, 287Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (2002), Towards a Truly Common Law: Europe as a Laboratory for Legal Pluralism, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. and Vervaele, J. A. E. (eds.) (2000), The Implementation of Corpus Juris in the Member States, Antwerp/Groningen/Oxford, Vol. 1Google Scholar
Douglas-Scott, S. (2002), Constitutional Law of the European Union, HarlowGoogle Scholar
Forti, G. (2000), ‘Remarks on the Role of Criminal Sanction in a Sustainable Prevention of Crimes in the Public Administration: The Italian Experience of Systemic Corruption’ in Bernasconi, P. (ed.), Responding to Corruption: Social Defence, Corruption, and the Protection of Public Administration and the Independence of Justice, updated documents of the XIIIth International Congress on Social Defence, Lecce, Italy 1996, Naples, 173Google Scholar
Geradin, D. and Henry, D. (2005), The EC Fining Policy for Violations of Competition Law: An Empirical Review of the Commission Decisional Practice and the Community Courts' Judgments, Global Competition Law Centre (GCLC), Working Paper 03/05
Gilmore, W. C. (2011), Dirty Money: The Evolution of International Measures to Counter Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism, 4th edn, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
Huber, B. (2002), ‘Sanctions Against Bribery Offences in Criminal Law’ in Fijnaut, C. and Huberts, L. (eds.), Corruption, Integrity and Law Enforcement, Leiden/Boston, 137Google Scholar
Kaiafa-Gbandi, M. (2012), ‘The Commission's Proposal for a Directive on the Fight Against Fraud to the Union's Financial Interests by Means of Criminal Law (COM(2012)363 final): An Assessment Based on the Manifesto for a European Criminal Policy’, 2(3) European Criminal Law Review319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerse, C. and Khan, N. (2005), EC Antitrust Procedures, 5th edn, LondonGoogle Scholar
Low, L. A. (2005), ‘Enforcement of the FCPA in the United States: Trends and the Effects of International Standards’, presentation at the Third Annual Conference of the IBA, ICC, and OECD, ‘The Awakening Giant of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Paris’, 4–6 May 2005
Nastou, P. (2010), ‘L'évaluation des parties à la Convention de l'OCDE sur la lutte contre la corruption d'agents publics étrangers dans les transactions commerciales internationales: Un mécanisme institutionnel de suivi au service de l'harmonisation des législations et pratiques nationales’ in Dormoy, D., La corruption et le droit international, Brussels, 5Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (2007) [cited Pieth 2007a], ‘Das OECD-Übereinkommen über die Bekämpfung der Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr’ in Dölling, D. (ed.), Handbuch der Korruptionsprävention, Munich, 563Google Scholar
Pieth, M. and Eigen, P. (eds.) (1999), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied/Kriftel/Basel/Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
Szarek-Mason, P. (2010), The European Union's Fight Against Corruption: The Evolving Policy Towards Member States and Candidate Countries, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobler, C. (2005), Remedies and Sanctions in EC Non-Discrimination Law: Effective, Proportionate and Dissuasive National Sanctions and Remedies, with particular reference to Upper Limits on Compensation to Victims of Discrimination, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A. (2011), ‘Enforcing Enforcement: Is the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention's Peer Review Effective?’, 43 George Washington International Law Review137Google Scholar
Von Hirsch, A. (1987), ‘The Sentencing Commission's Functions’ in von Hirsch, A., Knapp, K. A. and Tonry, M., The Sentencing Commission and its Guidelines, Boston, 3Google Scholar
Von Hirsch, A. and Ashworth, A. (2005), Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hirsch, A., Knapp, K. A. and Tonry, M. (1987), The Sentencing Commission and its Guidelines, BostonGoogle Scholar
Walther, S. (2004), ‘Communication over Confrontation: Modern Criminal Procedure in Transformation’ in Eser, A. and Rabenstein, C. (eds.), Strafjustiz im Spannungsfeld von Effizienz und Fairness, Berlin, 367Google Scholar
Weatherill, S. (2007), Cases and Materials on EU Law, 6th edn, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×