Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Editor's preface
- Introduction
- 1 At the crossroads of magic and science: John Dee's Archemastrie
- 2 The occult tradition in the English universities of the Renaissance: a reassessment
- 3 Analogy versus identity: the rejection of occult symbolism, 1580–1680
- 4 Marin Mersenne: Renaissance naturalism and Renaissance magic
- 5 Nature, art, and psyche: Jung, Pauli, and the Kepler–Fludd polemic
- 6 The interpretation of natural signs: Cardano's De subtilitate versus Scaliger's Exercitationes
- 7 Kepler's attitude toward astrology and mysticism
- 8 Kepler's rejection of numerology
- 9 Francis Bacon's biological ideas: a new manuscript source
- 10 Newton and alchemy
- 11 Witchcraft and popular mentality in Lorraine, 1580–1630
- 12 The scientific status of demonology
- 13 “Reason,” “right reason,” and “revelation” in midseventeenth-century England
- Index
7 - Kepler's attitude toward astrology and mysticism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Editor's preface
- Introduction
- 1 At the crossroads of magic and science: John Dee's Archemastrie
- 2 The occult tradition in the English universities of the Renaissance: a reassessment
- 3 Analogy versus identity: the rejection of occult symbolism, 1580–1680
- 4 Marin Mersenne: Renaissance naturalism and Renaissance magic
- 5 Nature, art, and psyche: Jung, Pauli, and the Kepler–Fludd polemic
- 6 The interpretation of natural signs: Cardano's De subtilitate versus Scaliger's Exercitationes
- 7 Kepler's attitude toward astrology and mysticism
- 8 Kepler's rejection of numerology
- 9 Francis Bacon's biological ideas: a new manuscript source
- 10 Newton and alchemy
- 11 Witchcraft and popular mentality in Lorraine, 1580–1630
- 12 The scientific status of demonology
- 13 “Reason,” “right reason,” and “revelation” in midseventeenth-century England
- Index
Summary
Among the friends of Johannes Kepler (1571–1630), the name of David Fabricius (1564–1617) stands out for two reasons. First, as an observational astronomer he initiated the study of variable stars. Second, he was an ardent devotee of astrology. In keeping with the latter enterprise, he collected horoscopes. On 18 July 1602 Kepler sent his own horoscope to Fabricius. Dissatisfied with the lack of detail in what he had received, Fabricius pressed Kepler for additional information. In particular he wanted to know “on what day in the carnival season in the year [15]91 a fever attacked” Kepler.
Kepler's reply is preserved only in a copy prepared by a hired scribe. This copyist did not always understand what Kepler had written in his draft of the letter. In some cases the copyist made mistakes; in other cases he simply omitted what he could not read. Thus, where Kepler answered Fabricius's question about the fever in 1591, the surviving copy says:
In the year 1591 on the Friday [1 March] following Ash Wednesday [27 February] a headache marked the beginning of a very acute fever that lasted 8 days and nearly killed me. If I remember correctly, the sun was 90° from Mars. After the preceding Christmas holidays [in 1590], as I was leaving the church and the services I suffered very much from the extremely bitter cold. Hence, from my illness during the previous autumn [of 1590] there had been remnants, which erupted during the carnival [in 1591]. […]
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Occult Scientific Mentalities , pp. 253 - 272Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1984
- 4
- Cited by