Book contents
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Part 1 The Role of Simulation
- 1 Setting the Scene for Simulation-Based Education
- 2 The Where of Simulation Training
- 3 Interprofessional In Situ Simulation
- 4 Debriefing and the Debrief
- 5 Fidelity in Obstetric Simulation
- Part 2 The Impact of Human Factors in Clinical Practice
- Part 3 Clinical Scenarios
- Scenario Section 1 Obstetric
- Scenario Section 2 Maternal Collapse
- Scenario Section 3 Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
- Scenario Section 4 Neuraxial Analgesia
- Scenario Section 5 Non-Neuraxial Analgesia
- Scenario Section 6 General Anaesthesia
- Scenario Section 7 Haemorrhage
- Scenario Section 8 Sepsis
- Scenario Section 9 Cardiac
- Scenario Section 10 Endocrine
- Scenario Section 11 Neurological
- Scenario Section 12 Trauma
- Scenario Section 13 Neonatal
- Index
- References
5 - Fidelity in Obstetric Simulation
from Part 1 - The Role of Simulation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2019
Book contents
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Part 1 The Role of Simulation
- 1 Setting the Scene for Simulation-Based Education
- 2 The Where of Simulation Training
- 3 Interprofessional In Situ Simulation
- 4 Debriefing and the Debrief
- 5 Fidelity in Obstetric Simulation
- Part 2 The Impact of Human Factors in Clinical Practice
- Part 3 Clinical Scenarios
- Scenario Section 1 Obstetric
- Scenario Section 2 Maternal Collapse
- Scenario Section 3 Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
- Scenario Section 4 Neuraxial Analgesia
- Scenario Section 5 Non-Neuraxial Analgesia
- Scenario Section 6 General Anaesthesia
- Scenario Section 7 Haemorrhage
- Scenario Section 8 Sepsis
- Scenario Section 9 Cardiac
- Scenario Section 10 Endocrine
- Scenario Section 11 Neurological
- Scenario Section 12 Trauma
- Scenario Section 13 Neonatal
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation , pp. 29 - 34Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Cook, D. A., Hamstra, S. J., Brydges, R., et al. (2013). Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Teacher, 35, e867–e898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, S. and Biro, M. (2015). Hybrid simulated patient methodology: managing maternal deterioration. In Nestel, D. and Bearman, M. (Eds.), Simulated Patient Methodology: Theory, Evidence and Practice, pp. 120–125. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cooper, S., Bulle, B., Biro, M. A., et al. (2012). Managing women with acute physiological deterioration: student midwives performance in a simulated setting. Women and Birth, 25(3), e27–e36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofts, J. F., Bartlett, C., Ellis, D., et al. (2006). Training for shoulder dystocia. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 108, 1477–1485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crofts, J. F., Bartlett, C., Ellis, D., et al. (2008). Patient-actor perception of care: a comparison of obstetric emergency training using manikins and patient-actors. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 17, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeStephano, C. C., Chou, B., Patel, S., et al. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of birth simulation for medical students. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 213, 91.e1–91.e7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Wit-Zuurendonk, L. D. & Oei, S. G. (2011). Serious gaming in women's health care. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 118, 17–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engström, H., Hagiwara, M. A., Backlund, P., et al. (2016). The impact of contextualization on immersion in healthcare simulation. Advances in Simulation, 1(1), 8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fransen, A., van de Ven, J., Schuit, E., van Tetering, A. A. C., Mol, B. W. and Oei, S. G. (2017). Simulation-based team training for multi-professional obstetric care teams to improve patient outcome: a multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 124, 641–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, Z., Siddiqui, N., Katznelson, R., et al. (2009). Clinical impact of epidural anesthesia simulation on short- and long-term learning curve: high- versus low-fidelity model training. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 34, 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R., & Raemer, D. B. (2008). Simulation in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 35, 97–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higham, J., Nestel, D., Lupton, M. and Kneebone, R. (2007). Teaching and learning gynaecology examination with hybrid simulation. The Clinical Teacher, 4, 238–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kardong-Edgren, S., Anderson, M. and Michaels, J. (2007). Does simulation fidelity improve student test scores? Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 3, e21–e24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneebone, R., Kidd, J., Nestel, D., Asvall, S., Paraskeva, P. and Darzi, A. (2002). An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Medical Education, 36(7), 628–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, A., Nestel, D., Stoyles, S., East, C., Wallace, E. M. and White, C. (2016). Simulation based training in a publicly funded home birth programme in Australia: a qualitative study. Women Birth, 29(1), 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedonia, C. R., Gherman, R. B. and Satin, A. J. (2003). Simulation laboratories for training in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 102, 388–392.Google ScholarPubMed
Magee, S. R., Shields, R. and Nothnagle, M. (2013). Low cost, high yield: simulation of obstetric emergencies for family medicine training. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 25, 207–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maran, N. J. and Glavin, R. (2003). Low to high fidelity simulation – a continuum of medical education? Medical Education, 37, 22–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R. and Scalese, R. J. (2010). A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Medical Education, 44(1), 50–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, R. B. (1953). Psychological Considerations in the Design of Training Equipment. Pittsburgh, PA: American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
Nathan, L. M., Patauli, D., Nsabimana, D., et al. (2016). Retention of skills 2 years after completion of a postpartum hemorrhage simulation training program in rural Rwanda. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 134, 350–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Say, L., Chou, D., Gemmill, A., et al. (2014). Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 2, e323–e333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholz, C., Mann, C., Kopp, V., et al. (2012). High-fidelity simulation increases obstetric self-assurance and skills in undergraduate medical students. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 40, 607–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, D. M., Cohen, S. R., Estrada, F., et al. (2012). PRONTO training for obstetric and neonatal emergencies in Mexico. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 116, 128–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yau, C. W. H., Pizzo, E., Morris, S., et al. (2016). The cost of local, multi-professional obstetric emergencies training. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 95, 1111–1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed