Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:52:27.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Styles of Romantic Love

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2018

By
Clyde Hendrick  and
Susan S. Hendrick
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg  and
Karin Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Karin Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

To understand why we view love as we do, it is necessary (or at least useful) to understand how we came to our viewpoints. When we first began our research on love, we were newlyweds (beginning a second marriage with some life experience and heaps of idealism). In addition, we were a counseling psychologist (Susan) and a social psychologist (Clyde), trying to find an area of work that would be practical (Susan conducted couple therapy in her private practice) and empirically rigorous (Clyde was a seasoned scholar).

Type
Chapter
Information
The New Psychology of Love , pp. 223 - 239
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, N. L., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1986). Male sexual preference and attitudes toward love and sexuality. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 12 (2), 27–30.Google Scholar
Cho, W., & Cross, S. E. (1995). Taiwanese love styles and their association with self-esteem and relationship quality. Genetic, Social, & General Psychology Monographs, 121, 283–309.Google Scholar
Contreras, R., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1996). Perspectives on marital love and satisfaction in Mexican American and Anglo-American couples. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 408–415.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Cramer, K., Marcus, J., Pomerleau, C., & Gillard, K. (2015). Gender invariance in the love attitudes scale based on Lee’s color theory of love. TPM, 22, 403–413.Google Scholar
Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Ward, C. (1997). Marital satisfaction and spousal interaction. In Sternberg, R. J. & Hojjat, M. (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 160–189). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. E. (2000). Lust, attraction, attachment: Biology and evolution of three primary emotion systems for mating, reproduction, and parenting. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 25, 96–104.Google Scholar
Gana, K., Saada, Y., & Untas, A. (2013). Effects of love styles on marital satisfaction in heterosexual couples: A dyadic approach. Marriage and Family Review, 49, 754–772.Google Scholar
Grote, N. K., & Frieze, L. H. (1994). The measurement of friendship-based love in intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 1, 275–300.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E. (1988). Passionate and companionate love. In Sternberg, R. J. & Barnes, M. L. (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 191–217). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 383–410.Google Scholar
Heaven, P. C. L., Da Silva, T., Carey, C., & Holen, J. (2004). Loving styles: Relationships with personality and attachment styles. European Journal of Personality, 18, 103–113.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392–402.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C., (1988). Lovers wear rose colored glasses. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 161–183.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C., (1990). A relationship-specific version of the Love Attitudes Scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 239–254.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C., (2003). Romantic love: Measuring Cupid’s arrow. In Lopez, S. J. & Snyder, C. R. (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 235–249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C., (2012). Six ways to love. The Psychotherapist, 52, 18–20.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C., (in press). Love. In Snyder, C. R., Lopez, S. J., Edwards, L. M., & Marques, S. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S., & Dicke, A. (1998). The Love Attitudes Scale: Short form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 147–159.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S., & Reich, D. A. (2006). The Brief Sexual Attitudes Scale. The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 76–86.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S., Foote, F. H., & Slapion-Foote, M. J. (1984). Do men and women love differently? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 177–195.Google Scholar
Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1987a). Love and sex attitudes: A close relationship. In Jones, W. H. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships, Vol. 1 (pp. 141–169). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Hendrick, S. S., (1987b). Love and sex attitudes and religious beliefs. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, S. S., (1987c). Love and sexual attitudes, self-disclosure, and sensation seeking. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 281–297.Google Scholar
Hendrick, S. S., (1995). Gender differences and similarities in sex and love. Personal Relationships, 2, 55–65.Google Scholar
Hendrick, S. S., (2006). Measuring respect in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 881–899.Google Scholar
Hendrick, S. S., (in press). Measuring love. In Gallagher, S. J. Lopez & M. (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 980–988.Google Scholar
Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., & Logue, E. M. (2010). Respect and the family. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 126–136.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Inman-Amos, J., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1994). Love attitudes: Similarities between parents and between parents and children. Family Relations, 43, 456–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. P. (1987, November). Discussion of papers on love styles and family relationships. In Davis, K. E. (chair), New directions in love style research. Symposium conducted at the Preconference Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop. Atlanta, GA: National Council on Family Relations.Google Scholar
Katz, J., & Schneider, M. E. (2013). Casual hook up sex during the first year of college: Prospective associations with attitudes about sex and love relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1451–1462.Google Scholar
Lasswell, T. E., & Lasswell, M. E. (1976). I love you but I’m not in love with you. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 38, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, M., & Lobsenz, N. M. (1980). Styles of loving: Why you love the way you do. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, J. A. (1973). The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Don Mills, ON: New Press.Google Scholar
LeGall, A., Mullet, E., & Riviere-Shafighi, S. (2002). Age, religious beliefs, and sexual attitudes. The Journal of Sex Research, 39, 207–216.Google Scholar
Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (2000). Respect: An exploration. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Meeks, B. S., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1998). Communication, love, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 755–773.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. J., & Sorell, G. T. (1997). Differences in love attitudes across family life stages. Family Relations, 46, 55–61.Google Scholar
Morrow, G. D., Clark, E. M., & Brock, K. F. (1995). Individual and partner love styles: Implications for the quality of romantic involvement. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 363–387.Google Scholar
Murstein, B. I., Merighi, J. R., & Vyse, S. A. (1991). Love styles in the United States and France: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 37–46.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. A., & Spaulding, L. R. (2000). The close relationships of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 111–123). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Regan, P. C. (1998). Romantic love and sexual desire. Inde Munck, V. C. (Ed.), Romantic love and sexual behavior: Perspectives from the social sciences (pp. 91–112). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Regan, P. C. (2016). Loving unconditionally: Demographic correlates of the agapic love style. Interpersona, 10, 28–35.Google Scholar
Regan, P. C., & Berscheid, E. (1999). Lust: What we know about human sexual desire. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaver, P. R., Morgan, H. J., & Wu, S. (1996). Is love a “basic” emotion? Personal Relationships, 3, 81–96.Google Scholar
Shahrazad, W. S., Mohd, S., & Hoesni, C. S. T. (2012). Investigating the factor structure of the Love Attitude Scale (LAS) with Malaysian samples. Asian Social Science, 8(9), 66–73.Google Scholar
Singer, I. (1984). The nature of love, Vol. 1: Plato to Luther (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R., & Klases, A. (2016). Predictors of love attitudes: The contribution of cultural orientation, gender attachment style, relationship length and age in participants from the UK and Hong Kong. Interpersona, 10, 90–108.Google Scholar
Sokolski, D. M., & Hendrick, S. S. (1999). Fostering marital satisfaction. Family Therapy, 26, 39–49.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., Aron, A., Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E., & Levitskaya, A. (1994). Love: American style, Russian style, and Japanese style. Personal Relationships 1, 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.Google Scholar
White, J. K., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (2004). Big five personality variables and relationship constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1519–1530.Google Scholar
Zadeh, S. S., & Bozorgi, Z. D. (2016). Relationship between the love styles, personality traits, and the marital life of married students. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3, 746–756.Google Scholar
Zamora, R., Winterowd, C., Koch, J., & Roring, S. (2013). The relationship between love styles and romantic attachment styles in gay men. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 7, 200–217.Google Scholar
Zeng, X., Pan, Y., Zhou, H., Yu, S., & Liu, X. (2016). Exploring different patterns of love attitudes among Chinese college students. PLoS ONE, 11(11), e0166410.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×