Book contents
- New Frontiers of the Capability Approach
- New Frontiers of the Capability Approach
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 On Sen on the Capability of Capabilities
- Part I The Need for New Foundations
- Part II The Operationalisation Frontier
- Part III The Application Frontier
- Part IV The Housing and Urban Frontier
- Part V The Education Frontier
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Part I - The Need for New Foundations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 October 2018
Book contents
- New Frontiers of the Capability Approach
- New Frontiers of the Capability Approach
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 On Sen on the Capability of Capabilities
- Part I The Need for New Foundations
- Part II The Operationalisation Frontier
- Part III The Application Frontier
- Part IV The Housing and Urban Frontier
- Part V The Education Frontier
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- New Frontiers of the Capability Approach , pp. 51 - 176Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Akerlof, G. A. and Shiller, R. J. (2015) Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. M. (2004) ‘Capabilities Human Rights and Moral Pluralism’. The International Journal of Human Rights Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 451–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958) ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’. Philosophy Vol. 22, No. 124, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1958) Two Concepts of Liberty Lecture, Oxford University, 31 October; subsequently published by the Clarendon Press, and in Berlin (1969).Google Scholar
Constant, B. (1819) ‘The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns’. In Fontana, Biancamaria ed., The Political Writings of Benjamin Constant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 309–28.Google Scholar
Davies, N. (1981) God's Playground: A History of Poland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deneulin, S. (2006) ‘Individual well-being, migration remittances and the common good’. The European Journal of Development Research Vol. 18, No. 1 (March), pp. 45–58.Google Scholar
Deneulin, S. (2009) ‘Ideas related to human development’. In Deneulin, Séverine and Shahni, Lila, eds. An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Deneulin, S. and Stewart, F. (2002) ‘Amartya Sen's Contribution to Development Thinking’. Studies in Comparative International Development Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 61–70.Google Scholar
Dodes, L. and Dodes, Z. (2014) The Sober Truth: Debunking the Bad Science behind 12-step Programs and the Rehab Industry. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Douglass, B. (1980) ‘The Common Good and the Public Interest’. Political Theory Vol. 8, No. 1 (February), pp. 103–17.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1982) ‘Sour grapes: Utilitarianism and the genesis of wants’. In Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard, eds. Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–38.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1985) Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, P. (2002) ‘Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen's development as freedom’. Studies in Comparative International Development Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 54–60.Google Scholar
Gaudium et Spes (1965) [Joy and Hope] Encyclical of Pope Paul VI, promulgated December 7.Google Scholar
Geetz, C. (1973) ‘Thick Description: Toward an Interpretative Theory of Culture’. In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York, NY: Basic Books, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Herdt, J. (2008) Putting on Virtue: The Legacy of the Splendid Vices. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hollenbach, D. (2002) The Common Good and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’. Econometrica Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 263–91.Google Scholar
Khader, S. J. (2011) Adaptive Preferences and Women's Empowerment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (2009) How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? The New York Times, 2 September.Google Scholar
Mater et Magistra (1961) [Mother and Teacher] Encyclical of Pope John XXIII, promulgated 15 May.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2010) ‘A distinction regarding happiness in ancient philosophy’. Social Research: An International Quarterly Vol. 77, No. 2 (Summer), pp. 595–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W. and Ebbesen, E. B. (1970) ‘Attention in delay of gratification’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 329–337.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., et al. (2011) ‘“Willpower” over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation’. SCAN Vol. 6, pp. 252–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y. and Rodriguez, M. L. (1989) ‘Delay of Gratification in Children’. Science New Series Vol. 244, No. 4907, pp. 933–8.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2005) The common good The Review of Metaphysics Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 133–64.Google Scholar
NIV (2016) New International Version Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2003) ‘Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice’. Feminist Economics Vol. 9, No. 2–3, pp. 33–59.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1977) Class: ‘The Self, the Future and the Rational Thing To Do’. Oxford University, Hillary Term.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. (2009) ‘Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity’. Ecology and Society Vol. 14, No. 2, Art. 32. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B. (1973) Utilitarianism: For and Against Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, F. (2005) ‘Groups and Capabilities’. Journal of Human Development Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasker, J. P. (2016) ‘Trudeau cabinet approves Trans Mountain, Line 3 pipelines, rejects Northern Gateway’. CBC news. www.cbc.ca/amp/1.3872828 (29 November).Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1980) ‘Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice’. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Vol. 1, pp. 39–60.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Welby, J. (2015) ‘Building the common good’. In Sentamu, John, ed. On Rock or Sand? Firm Foundations for Britain's Future. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Wood, R. (2004) ‘The Heresy of Solitary Faith’. Christianity Today (January), pp. 58–60.Google Scholar
References
Alkire, S. (2005). ‘Subjective Quantitative Studies of Human Agency’. Social Indicators Research Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 217–60.Google Scholar
Alkire, S. (2008). ‘Concepts and Measures of Agency’. In Basu, K. and Kanbur, R., eds., Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 455–74.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. (1989). ‘Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare’. Philosophical Studies Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 77–93.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. (2011). ‘Rawls, Responsibility and Distributive Justice’. In Fleurbaey, M., Salles, M., and Weymark, J., eds., Justice, Political Liberalism and Utilitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80–107.Google Scholar
Ballet, J., Dubois, J. L., Mahieu, F. R. (2007). ‘Responsibility for Each Other's Freedom: Agency as the Source of Collective Capability.’ Journal of Human Development Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 185–201.Google Scholar
Ballet, J., Bazin, D., Dubois, J. L., Mahieu, F. R. (2014). Freedom, Responsibility and Economics of the Person. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bonvin, M. and Farvaque, N. (2004). ‘Social Opportunities and Individual Responsibility: The Capability Approach and the Third Way’. Ethique Economique Vol. 2, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. (1998). The Quest for Responsibility, Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruni, L., Comim, F., Pugno, M. (2008). Capabilities and Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1989). ‘On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice’. Ethics Vol. 99 No. 4, pp. 906–44.Google Scholar
Conill, Sancho J. (2004). Horizontes de economía ética: Aristóteles, Adam Smith, Amartya Sen. Madrid: Tecnos.Google Scholar
Cortina, A. (2002). Por una ética de consumo: La ciudadanía del consumidor en un mundo global. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
Cortina, A. (2007). Ética de la razón cordial : educar en la ciudadanía en el siglo XXI. Oviedo: Nobel.Google Scholar
Crocker, D. (2009). Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability and Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crocker, D. and Robeyns, I. (2010) ‘Capability and Agency’. In Morris, C. W., ed., Amartya Sen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–90.Google Scholar
Deneulin, S., Nebel, M., Sagovsky, N. (eds.) (2006). Transforming Unjust Structures: The Capability Approach. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1981). ‘What is Equality? Part II. Equality of Resources’. Philosophy and Public Affairs Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 283–345.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. L. (2008). Justice, Luck and Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nebel, M. and Herrera Rendon, T. (2006). ‘A Hermeneutic of Amartya Sen's Concepts of Capability’. International Journal of Social Economics Vol. 33, No. 10, pp. 710–22.Google Scholar
Nebel, M. (2007). ‘Fundamentos éticos de la capabilidad de afiliación’. Estudios Vol. 83, pp. 45–78.Google Scholar
Nebel, M. (2010). ‘Good Governance: the Practice of Social Power’. In Beretta, S. and Zoboli, R., eds., Global Governance in a Plural World. Milan: Vita e Pensiero, pp. 23–61.Google Scholar
Nebel, M. (2014). ‘Identidad y Capabilidad’. In Nebel, M., Crespo, P. Flores, and Rendon, T. Herrera, eds., Desarrollo como Libertad en América Latina. Fundamentos y Aplicaciones. Mexico: Editorial Universidad Iberoamericana, pp. 143–161.Google Scholar
Nebel, M., Flores Crespo, P., Herrera Rendon, T. (2014). Desarrollo como Libertad en América Latina. Fundamentos y Aplicaciones. Mexico: Editorial Universidad Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2006). ‘Education and Democratic Citizenship: Capabilities and Quality Education’. Journal of Human Development Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 385–95.Google Scholar
Prabhakar, R. (2002). ‘Capability Responsibility, Human Capital and the Third Way’. Political Quarterly Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 51–7.Google Scholar
Ricœur, P. (1995). ‘Le concept de responsabilité. Essai d'analyse sémantique’. In Ricœur, P., ed., Le Juste. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2005). ‘The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey’. Journal of Human Development Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 93–114.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2009). ‘Capability and Theories of Justice’. In Martinetti, E. Chiappero, ed., Debating Global Society: Reach and Limits of the Capability Approach. Milan: Feltrinelli, pp. 61–90.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. (1995). ‘Equality and Responsibility’. Boston Review Vol. April/May (http://new.bostonreview.net/BR20.2/roemer.html; Accessed on 2 May 2016).Google Scholar
Scheffer, S. (2005). ‘Choice, Circumstances and the Value of Equality’. Politics, Philosophy and Economics Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1985a). ‘Well-being, Agency and Freedom: the Dewey Lectures 1984’. Journal of Philosophy Vol. 82, pp. 169–221.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1997). ‘Maximization and the Act of Choice’. Econometrica Vol. 65, pp. 745–79.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2004). Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap-Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stemplowska, Z. (2009). ‘Making Justice Sensitive to Responsibility’. Political Studies Vol. 57, No. 2 pp. 237–59.Google Scholar
References
Arrow, Kenneth. Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 1963[1951].Google Scholar
Ben-Porath, Sigal. Education for a shared fate citizenship. In Allen, D. and Reich, R., eds. Education, Justice and Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1907[1780].Google Scholar
Callan, Eamonn. Citizenship and education. Annual Review of Political Science, 2004, 7: 71–90.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marquis de. Essay on the Application of Analysis to the Probability of Majority Decisions. 1785.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. The Theory of Communicative Action I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. The Theory of Communicative Action II: Lifeworld and System. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Of the Social Contract. In Essays and Treatises on Several Subjects. London, 1777[1748].Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996[1962].Google Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003[1690].Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. Cultivating Humanity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. Political Emotions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole, Mills, Charles. Contract and Domination. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice – Revised Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999a[1971].Google Scholar
Rawls, J. The Law of People with The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999b.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. Justice: What's the Right Thing To Do? New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 2nd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998[1982].Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. A Universidade no Séc. XXI: Para uma Reforma Democrática e Emancipatória da Universidade. Sao Paulo: Cortez Editora, 2004.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. Quasi-transitivity, rational choice and collective decisions. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Jul., 1969), 381–93.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. The impossibility of a paretian liberal. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 78, No. 1 (1970), 152–7.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. Social choice. In Durlauf, S. and Blume, L., eds, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 7, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. Introduction. In Hanley, R. P., ed. Adam Smith: The Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York, NY: Penguin books, pp. 11–22, 2009b.Google Scholar
Siedentop, Larry. Inventing the Individual. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Cross-Purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate. In Taylor, Charles, ed. Philosophical Argument. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan. An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
References
Calestani, M. (2009). An anthropology of ‘the hood life’ in the Bolivian Plateau. Social Indicators Research, 90 (1), 141–53.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. L. (2011). On Personhood: A Perspective from Africa. In Theory from the South: Or, How Euro-America Is Evolving Toward Africa (pp. 45–56). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Comim, F. (2008). Social capital and the capability approach. In Castiglione, D., van Deth, J. W., & Wolleb, G. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Capital (pp. 624–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
DeLanda, M. (2009). The Geography of Assemblage Theory. Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kAwq7TACyk&list=PL121B56E661F64649Google Scholar
DeLanda, M. (2011). Assemblage Theory, Society, and Deleuze. Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-I5e7ixw78Google Scholar
Delaney, B. (2016, April 30). Eva Orner on Chasing Asylum: ‘Every Whistleblower that I Interviewed Wept’. Retrieved 1 July, 2016 from www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/apr/30/eva-orner-on-chasing-asylum-every-whistleblower-that-i-interviewed-weptGoogle Scholar
Douglas, M. and Ney, S. (1998). Missing Persons: A Critique of the Social Sciences. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (2015). Degrowth, postdevelopment, and transitions: a preliminary conversation. Sustainability Science, 10 (3), 451–62.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (1961). The Wretched of the Earth (1963 edn.). (C. Farrington, Trans.) New York, NY: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, P., Evershed, N. and Davidson, H. (2016, August 10). The Nauru files: cache of 2,000 leaked reports reveal scale of abuse of children in Australian offshore detention. The Guardian.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. P. (1995). Modes of immigration politics in liberal democratic states. The International Migration Review, 29 (4), 881–902.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2003). The human development paradigm: Operationalizing Sen's ideas on capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9 (2–3), 301–17.Google Scholar
Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grosfoguel, R. (2013). The structure of knowledge in westernized universities: epistemic racism/sexism and the four genocides/epistemicides of the long 16th century. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 11 (1), Article 8, 73–90.Google Scholar
Grosfoguel, R., Oso, L. and Christou, A. (2015). ‘Racism’, intersectionality and migration studies: framing some theoretical reflections. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 22 (6), 635–52.Google Scholar
Gullestad, M. (2002). Invisible fences: egalitarianism, nationalism and racism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8 (1), 45–63.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (2008). DeLanda's ontology: assemblage and realism. Continental Philosophy Review, 41 (3), 367–83.Google Scholar
Hyndman, J. and Mountz, A. (2008). Another brick in the wall? Neo-refoulement and the externalization of asylum by Australia and Europe. Government and Opposition, 43 (2), 249–69.Google Scholar
Kaphagawani, D. N. (2004). African conceptions of a person: a critical survey. In Wiredu, K. (Ed.), A Companion to African Philosophy (pp. 332–42). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Klugman, J., Rodríguez, F. and Choi, H.-J. (2011). The HDI 2010: new controversies, old critiques. The Journal lf Economic Inequality, 9 (2), 249–88.Google Scholar
Knapp, M., Flach, A. and Ayboğa, E. (2016). Revolution in Rojava: Democratic Autonomy and Women's Liberation in Syrian Kurdistan. (J. Biehl, Trans.). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
La Via Campesina. (2007). Declaration of Nyéléni. Nyéléni Village, Sélingué, Mali: Forum for Food Sovereignty.Google Scholar
Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Kampala: Fountain Publishers.Google Scholar
Mares, P. (2001). Borderline: Australia's Treatment of Refugees and Asylum Seekers. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Mbembe, A. (2000). At the edge of the world: boundaries, territoriality, and sovereignty in Africa. Public Culture, 12 (1), 259–84.Google Scholar
McFarlane, C. (2009). Translocal assemblages: space, power and social movements. Geoforum, 40 (4), 561–7.Google Scholar
McGregor, C. (2014). From social movement learning to sociomaterial movement learning? Addressing the possibilities and limits of new materialism. Studies in the Education of Adults, 46 (2), 211–27.Google Scholar
Menkiti, I. A. (1984). Person and community in African traditional thought. In Wright, R. A. (Ed.), African Philosophy: An Introduction (pp. 171–81). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Mignolo, W. D. (2000). Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
National Aboriginal Freedom Movement. (2015). Aboriginal Sovereign Manifesto of Demands. Canberra: Aboriginal Embassy.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peralta, E. (2016, August 11). Australia's Immigration Minister Plays Down Claims Of Abuse On Refugee Island. NPR.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2000). An Unworkable Idea or a Promising Alternative? Sen's Capability Approach Re-examined. Leuven: University of Leuven, Center for Economic Studies Discussions Paper Series (DPS).Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2005). The Capability Approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6 (1), 93–114.Google Scholar
Siegfried, K. (2014, March 12). Private Security Firms Prosper as more Migrants Detained. Available at: www.irinnews.org/analysis/2014/03/12/private-security-firms-prosper-more-migrants-detainedGoogle Scholar
Skenderovic, D. (2007). Immigration and the radical right in Switzerland: ideology, discourse and opportunities. Patterns of Prejudice, 41 (2), 155–76.Google Scholar
Stewart, F., and Deneulin, S. (2002). Amartya Sen's contribution to development thinking. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37 (2), 61–70.Google Scholar
UNDP. (2015). Human Development Report 2015: Work for Human Development. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
References
Alkire, S. (2005) Why the capability approach? Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 115–33.Google Scholar
Ballet, J., Dubois, J. and Mahieu, F. (2007) Responsibility of each others freedom: agency as a source of collective capability. Journal of Human Development Capabilities, 8(2), 185–201.Google Scholar
Biggeri, M., Ballet, J. and Comim, F. (2011) Children and the Capability Approach. Palgrave: Macmillen.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1973) Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction. London: Travistock.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press and Polity.Google Scholar
Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (1991) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cleaver, F. (2007) Understanding agency in collective action. Journal of Human Development and Capability, 8(2), 223–44.Google Scholar
Crossley, N. (2002) Making Sense of Social Movements. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Deneulin, S., Nebel, M. and Sagovsky, N. (Eds.) (2006) Transforming Unjust Structures: The Capability Approach. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P. (Eds.) (1983) Michael Foucault: Beyond Stucturalism and Hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, J. and Ballet, J. (2007). Responsibility for each others’ freedom: agency as the source of collective capability. Journal for Human Development and Capability, 8(2), 185–201.Google Scholar
Evans, P. (2002) Collective capabilities, culture and Amartya Sen's development as freedom. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2), 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (2004) Lecture: Society must be Defended. Translated by D. Macey. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. (Eds.) (2004) Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning and Emotion. London: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (2007[1971]). Selections from the Prison Notebook. Hoare, Q. and Smith, G. (Eds. and Trans). London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (1997) The Critique of Power: Reflective Strategies in a Critical Social Theory. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hossain, A. (2015) Contested national identity and political crisis in Bangladesh: historical analysis of the dynamics of Bangladesh society and politics. Asian Journal of Political Science, 23(3), 366–9.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, S. (2006) From individual to collective capabilities: the capability approach as a conceptual framework for self help. Journal for Human Development and Capability, 7(3), 398–416.Google Scholar
Johnstone, H. (2009) Culture, Social Movement and Protest. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2011) Bangladesh Politics, Economy and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1853) On the Jewish Question, in Tucker, R. (Eds.) (1978) The Marx Engels Reader. New York: Norton and Company, 26–46Google Scholar
May, T. (1994) The Political Philosophy of Post Structural Anarchism. Pennsylvania, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. (Ed.) (1992) Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Negri, (2005) The Politics of Subversion: a Manifesto for the 21st Century. Polity PressGoogle Scholar
Panet, S. and Duray-Soundron, C. (2008) Introduction General. In Dubois, J., Brouillet, A., Bakhshi, and Duray-soudron, C. (Eds.) Repenser l'action collective: une approche par les capability. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Pelenc, J., Lompo, M., Ballet, J., Dubois, J. (2013) Sustainable human development and the capability approach: integrating environmental responsibility and collective agency. Journal of Human Development and Capability, 14(1), 77–94.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P (Ed.) (1991) The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault's Thought. London: Penguin Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2009) The Theory of Justice, Revised Edition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Riaz, A. and Rahman, M. (Eds.) (2016) Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Bangladesh. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sajjad, T. and Hardig, A. (2016) Too many enemies: mobilization, marginalisation and political violence. Terrorism and Political Violence, 29, 6, 1106–1125.Google Scholar
Sen, A. and Dreze, J. (2002). India: Development and Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, W. (1992) The Theory of structure: duality, agency and transformation. American journal of Sociology. 91, 1, 1–29.Google Scholar
Simon, R. (1982) Gramsci's political thought: An Introduction. London: Lawrence and Wishart Ltd.Google Scholar
Surin, K. (1990) Marxists and the withering away of the state. Social Texts. 27, 35–54Google Scholar
Van Schendel, W. (2009) A History of Bangladesh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmer, A. and Freise, M. (2008) Bringing society back in: Civil society, social capital and third sector. Civil Society and Governance in Europe. 19–42Google Scholar