Context

As noted earlier, the rhetorical question of 6.1, “Shall we remain in sin …?,” casts its shadow at least as far as 7.6, and is probably not fully answered before the end of chapter 8. In refuting this false inference, Paul yokes his argument to three analogies, baptism (6.3), slavery (6.16), and marriage (7.2–3). Each of these is introduced by the formulaic “Do you not know?” (6.3; 6.15; 7.1), revealing three distinct but closely connected literary segments: 6.1–14, 15–23; and 7.1–6. Like ever-widening concentric circles, the analogies broaden to address the readers from different perspectives: as Christians (baptism), as Romans (slavery), and as humans (marriage).

The analogy of 7.2–3 represents a daring step in the argument, though one which Paul has been maneuvering to make since the opening chapter: Ο δE δίκαιος Eκ πίστεως ζήσεται(1.17). To be sure, the word νΟμς is not absent from chapters 1–6, but Paul has yet to look Moses in the eye without blinking. He does so here. In describing the law as that which brings the knowledge of sin (3.21), works wrath (4.15), increases transgression (5.20), stands opposed to grace (5.20–21; 6.14), and so on, Paul was preparing the ground for the startling declaration in 7.4: “My friends, you have been put to death with respect to the law”.