Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Notes on Contributors
- Narrative and Understanding Persons
- Framing Narratives
- The Narrative Practice Hypothesis: Origins and Applications of Folk Psychology
- Dramatic Irony, Narrative, and the External Perspective
- Episodic Ethics
- On the Distance between Literary Narratives and Real-Life Narratives
- Reasons to be Fearful: Strawson, Death and Narrative
- Stories, Lives, and Basic Survival: A Refinement and Defense of the Narrative View
- Self and Other: The Limits of Narrative Understanding
- Pathologies in Narrative Structures
Dramatic Irony, Narrative, and the External Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Notes on Contributors
- Narrative and Understanding Persons
- Framing Narratives
- The Narrative Practice Hypothesis: Origins and Applications of Folk Psychology
- Dramatic Irony, Narrative, and the External Perspective
- Episodic Ethics
- On the Distance between Literary Narratives and Real-Life Narratives
- Reasons to be Fearful: Strawson, Death and Narrative
- Stories, Lives, and Basic Survival: A Refinement and Defense of the Narrative View
- Self and Other: The Limits of Narrative Understanding
- Pathologies in Narrative Structures
Summary
Introduction
There is a frequently asked philosophical question about our ability to grasp and to predict the thoughts and feelings of other people, an ability that is these days sometimes given the unfortunate name of ‘mentalising’ or ‘mind-reading’—I say ‘unfortunate’ because it makes appear mysterious what is not mysterious. Some philosophers and psychologists argue that this ability is grounded in possession of some kind of theory or body of knowledge about how minds work. Others argue that it is grounded in our capacity to take on in imagination the perspective of others; sometimes called simulating or centrally imagining another person, we entertain in our minds what the other person is thinking about and feeling: if he is thinking ‘p’ and ‘if p then q’, then we think ‘p’ and ‘if p then q’, and if he is feeling angry with someone, then we imagine feeling angry with that person. We thus recreate as well as we can in our imagination his mental life as it is ‘from the inside’. We can do this in two different ways: I can put myself in the other's shoes, simply imagining what I would do were I in his situation, or I can empathise with him, imagining being him, taking on in imagination his relevant traits and other mental dispositions; I will from now on use the term perspective-shifting to cover both of these imaginative activities.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Narrative and Understanding Persons , pp. 69 - 84Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
- 1
- Cited by