Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T02:11:21.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2009

Folke Tersman
Folke Tersman
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Moral Disagreement , pp. 133 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abreau, D. “On the Theory of Infinitely Repeated Games with Discounting,” Econometrica 56 (1988), 383–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M.Intention. Oxford: Blackwell, 1957Google Scholar
Asch, S. E.Social Psychology. New York: Prentice Hall, 1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A.Language, Truth and Logic. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1936Google Scholar
Bennigson, T. “Irresolvable Disagreement and the Case Against Moral Realism,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (1996), 411–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, L., and F⊘llesdal, D. “Interview with Donald Davidson,” Theoria 60 (1994), 207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. “Moral Realism,” in Casey, J. (ed.), Morality and Moral Reasoning. London: Methuen, 1971, 101–124Google Scholar
Blackburn, S.Spreading the Word. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. “Just Causes,” Philosophical Studies 61 (1991), 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S.Essays in Quasi-Realism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. “Attitudes and Contents,” reprinted in Essays in Quasi-Realism, 182–197
Blackburn, S. “Errors and the Phenomenology of Values,” reprinted in Essays in Quasi-Realism, 149–165
Blackburn, S. “The Flight to Reality,” in Hursthouse, R., Lawrence, G., and Quinn, W. (eds.), Virtues and Reasons. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995, 35–75Google Scholar
Blackburn, S.Ruling Passions. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998Google Scholar
Block, N. “Functional Role and Truth Conditions,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 61 (1987), 157–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, N. “An Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology,” reprinted in Stich, S. and Warfield, T. (eds), Mental Representation: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994Google Scholar
Bloomfield, P. “The Rules of ‘Goodness’: An Essay on Moral Semantics,” American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (2003), 197–213Google Scholar
BonJour, L.The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985Google Scholar
Boyd, R. “How to Be a Moral Realist,” in Sayre-McCord, G. (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988, 181–228Google Scholar
Brandt, R.Hopi Ethics: A Theoretical Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954Google Scholar
Brink, D. O.Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. “Individualism and the Mental,” in French, P., Uehling, T., and Wettstein, H. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979, 73–121Google Scholar
Burge, T. “Individualism and Psychology,” Philosophical Review 95 (1986), 3–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chagnon, N. A., and Hames, R. “Protein Deficiency and Tribal Warfare in Amazonia: New Data,” Science 203 (1979), 910–913CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chagnon, N.Yanomamö: The Fierce People (5th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt, 1997Google Scholar
Cohen, D., and Nisbett, R.Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996Google Scholar
Cohen, D., Nisbett, R., Bowdle, B., Schwarz, N. “Insult, Aggression, and the Southern Culture of Honor: An ‘Experimental Ethnography,’” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (1996), 945–960CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conee, E., and Feldman, R. “The Generality Problem for Reliabilism,” Philosophical Studies 89 (1998), 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, J.Morality and Cultural Differences. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999Google Scholar
Cooper, D. “Moral Relativism,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 3 (1978), 97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copp, D. “Milk, Honey, and the Good Life on Moral Twin Earth,” Synthese 124 (2000), 113–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copp, D. “Realist-Expressivism: A Neglected Option for Moral Realism,” Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2001), 1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, J.Moral Reasons. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993Google Scholar
Daniels, N. “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics,” Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979), 256–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S., Gibbard, A., Railton, P. “Toward Fin de siècle Ethics,” Philosophical Review 101 (1992), 115–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. “Toward a Unified Theory of Meaning and Action,” Grazer Philosophische Studien 11 (1980), 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D.Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984Google Scholar
Davidson, D.Expressing Evaluations, The Lindley Lecture, published as monograph. Lawrence: University of Kansas, 1984Google Scholar
Davidson, D. “A New Basis for Decision Theory,” Theory and Decision 18 (1985), 87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. “The Structure and Content of Truth,” Journal of Philosophy 87 (1990), 279–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. “On Quine's Philosophy', Theoria 60 (1994), 184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. “The Objectivity of Values,” in Gutierrez, C. (ed.), El Trabajo Filosofico de Hoy en el Continente. Bogota: Editorial ABC, 1995, 59–69Google Scholar
Davidson, D. “Objectivity and Practical Reason,” in Ullman-Margalit, E. (ed.), Reasoning Practically. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, 17–26Google Scholar
Davidson, D.Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. “The Myth of the Subjective,” reprinted in Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, 39–53
Davson-Galle, P. “Arguing, Arguments, and Deep Disagreements,” Journal of Informal Logic 14 (1992), 147–156Google Scholar
Doris, J. M., and Stich, S. P. “As a Matter of Fact: Empirical Perspectives on Ethics,” in Jackson, F., and Smith, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. “Objectivity and Truth. You'd Better Believe It,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 25 (1996), 87–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. “Reply to Critics.” BEARS, J. Dreier and D. Estlund (eds.), http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Philosophy/bears/homepage.html. Posted September 4, 1997
Dummett, M.Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth, 1978Google Scholar
Edney, J. “Freeriders en Route to Disaster,” Psychology Today 13 (1979), 80–112Google Scholar
Elster, J.The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, W. D., “‘Ought’ and Motivation,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 48 (1947–1948), 492–510Google Scholar
Feldman, R. “Logic, Meaning and Conceptual Role,” Journal of Philosophy 69 (1977), 379–408Google Scholar
Feldman, R. “Reliability and Justification,” Monist 68 (1985), 159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, H. “Logic, Meaning and Conceptual Role,” Journal of Philosophy 69 (1977), 379–408Google Scholar
Field, H. “The Deflationary Conception of Truth,” in MacDonald, G., and Wright, C. (eds.), Fact, Science and Morality, Oxford: Blackwell, 1986, 55–117Google Scholar
Foot, P.Virtues and Vices. Oxford: Blackwell, 1978Google Scholar
Frankena, W. “Obligation and Motivation in Recent Moral Philosophy,” in Melden, A. (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958, 40–81Google Scholar
F⊘llesdal, D. “The Status of Rationality Assumptions in Interpretation and in the Explanation of Action,” Dialectica 36 (1982), 301–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, W. B. “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1955–1956), 167–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, W. B.Philosophy and Historical Understanding. London: Chatto and Windus, 1964Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. “Assertion,” Philosophical Review 74 (1965), 449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A.Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990Google Scholar
Gibbard, A.Thinking How to Live. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003Google Scholar
Goldman, A. H.Moral Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1988Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I “What Is Justified Belief?,” in Pappas, G. (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979, 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowans, C. W. (ed.), Moral Disagreements: Classic and Contemporary Readings. London: Routledge, 1999Google Scholar
Grandy, R. “Reference, Belief and Meaning,” Journal of Philosophy 70 (1973), 439–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M. and Cohen, J. D. “An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment,” Science 293 (2001), 2105–2108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardin, G. “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science 162 (1968), 1243–1248Google ScholarPubMed
Hare, R.The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952Google Scholar
Hare, R. “A ‘Reductio Ad Absurdum’ of Descriptivism,” in Shanker, S. (ed.), Philosophy in Britain Today, London: Croom Helm, 1986, 118–136Google Scholar
Harman, G. “Moral Relativism Defended,” Philosophical Review 84 (1975), 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G.The Nature of Morality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977Google Scholar
Harman, G. “Moral Explanations of Natural Facts – Can Moral Claims Be Tested Against Moral Reality?,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (suppl.) (1986), 57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G. “Moral Philosophy and Linguistics,” in Brinkmann, K. (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th World Congress of Philosophy, Volume I: Ethics. Bowling Green, Ohio: Philosophy Documentation Center, 1999, 107–115Google Scholar
Harms, W. F. “Adaptation and Moral Realism,” Biology and Philosophy 15 (2000), 699–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M.Cannibals and Kings. New York: Random House, 1977Google Scholar
Harris, M. “Animal Capture and Yanamamo Warfare: Retrospect and New Evidence,” Journal of Anthropological Research 40 (1984), 183–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herskovits, M.Cultural Anthropology. New York: Knopf, 1955Google Scholar
Horgan, T., and Timmons, M. “New Wave Moral Realism Meets Moral Twin Earth,” Journal of Philosophical Research 16 (1990–1991), 447–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T., and Timmons, M. “Troubles on Moral Twin Earth,” Synthese 92 (1992), 221–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T., and Timmons, M. “From Moral Realism to Moral Relativism in One Easy Step,” Critica 28 (1996), 3–39Google Scholar
Horgan, T., and Timmons, M. “Copping Out on Moral Twin Earth,” Synthese 124 (2000), 139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, S. “Objectivity and Disagreement,” in Honderich, T. (ed.), Morality and Objectivity. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985, 54–97Google Scholar
Hurley, S.Natural Reasons, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989Google Scholar
Jackson, F.From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998Google Scholar
Jackson, F., and Pettit, P. “A Problem for Expressivism,” Analysis 58 (1998), 239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R.The Myth of Morality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. “Moral Realism and Teleosemantics,” Biology and Philosophy 16 (2001), 725–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S.Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980Google Scholar
Lehrer, K.Theory of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1990Google Scholar
Lenman, J. “The Externalist and the Amoralist,” Philosophia 27 (1999), 441–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. “Radical Interpretation,” Philosophical Papers (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983, 108–121Google Scholar
Lind, J. T. “Do the Rich Vote Conservative because They Are Rich?” http://folk.uio.no/jlind/papers/PartyInc.pdf
Loeb, D. “Moral Realism and the Argument from Disagreement,” Philosophical Studies 90 (1998), 281–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S. “Relativism in its Place,” in Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.), Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982, 261–305Google Scholar
Mackie, J.Ethics. Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin, 1977Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (ed.), Beyond Self-Interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990Google Scholar
McDowell, J. “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52 (Suppl.) (1978) 13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. “Values and Secondary Qualities,” in Honderich, T. (ed.), Morality and Objectivity. London: Routledge, & Kegan Paul, 1985, 110–129Google Scholar
Merli, D. “Return to Moral Twin Earth,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (2002), 207–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R.Moral Differences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R.Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984Google Scholar
Milo, R. D. “Moral Deadlock,” Philosophy 61 (1986), 453–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E.Ethics. London: Oxford University Press, 1912Google Scholar
Newton-Smith, W.The Rationality of Science. London: Routledge, 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E.Governing the Commons. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action,” American Political Science Review 92 (1998), 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D.Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984Google Scholar
Pettit, P. “Embracing Objectivity in Ethics,” in Leiter, B. (ed.), Objectivity in Law and Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 234–286Google Scholar
Pollock, J. L. “Reliability and Justified Belief,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (1984), 103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’,” in Mind, Language, and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975, 215–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” reprinted in From a Logical Point of View (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1961, 20–46Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. “Epistemology Naturalized,” in Ontological Relativity. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969, 69–90Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. “On the Nature of Moral Values,” reprinted in Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981, 55–66Google Scholar
Ross, W. D.The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1930Google Scholar
Ryan, J. “Moral Relativism and the Argument from Moral Disagreement,” Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (2003), 377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salwén, H.Hume's Law. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 2003Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. “The Many Moral Realisms,” in Sayre-McCord, G., (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988, 1–23Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. “Being a Realist about Relativism (in Ethics),” Philosophical Studies 61 (1991), 155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T.What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1999Google Scholar
Scheuler, G. F. “Modus Ponens and Moral Realism,” Ethics 98 (1988), 492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Scepticism (Julia Annas's and Jonathan Barnes's edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994
Shafer-Landau, R. “Ethical Disagreement, Ethical Objectivism and Moral Indeterminacy,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (1994), 331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. “Vagueness, Borderline Cases and Moral Realism,” American Philosophical Quarterly 32 (1995), 83–96Google Scholar
Sherif, M.The Psychology of Social Norms. New York: Harper & Row, 1936Google Scholar
Singer, P. “How Reliable are our Moral Intuitions?,” Free Inquiry 23 (2003), 19–20Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C.Ethics, Persuasion and Truth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984Google Scholar
Smith, M. “Objectivity and Moral Realism. On the Significance of the Phenomenology of Moral Experience,” in Haldane, J. and Wright, C. (eds.), Reality, Representation and Projection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 235–255Google Scholar
Smith, M.The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994Google Scholar
Sosa, E. “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge,” in French, P., Uehling, T. & Wettstein, H. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1980, 3–25Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. L.Ethics and Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1944Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. L.Facts and Values. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1963Google Scholar
Stout, J.Ethics After Babel. Boston: Beacon Press, 1988Google Scholar
Sturgeon, N. “What Difference Does It Make Whether Moral Realism is True?,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (Suppl.) (1986), 115–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgeon, N. “Moral Explanations,” reprinted in Sayre-McCord, G. (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988, 229–255Google Scholar
Sturgeon, N. “Contents and Causes,” Philosophical Studies 61 (1991), 19–37Google Scholar
Sturgeon, N. “Moral Disagreement and Moral Relativism,” Social Philosophy and Policy 11 (1994), 80–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tersman, F. “Utilitarianism and the Idea of Reflective Equilibrium,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (1991), 395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tersman, F. “Coherence and Disagreement,” Philosophical Studies 65 (1992), 305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tersman, F.Reflective Equilibrium. An Essay in Moral Epistemology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1993Google Scholar
Tersman, F. “Crispin Wright on Moral Disagreement,” Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1998), 359–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tersman, F. “Quine on Ethics,” Theoria 64 (1998), 84–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tersman, F. “Are We Lovers of the Good?,” Synthese 138 (2004), 247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, P.Darkness in El Dorado: How Scientists and Journalists Devastated the Amazon. London and New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2000Google Scholar
Tolhurst, W. “The Argument from Moral Disagreement,” Ethics 97 (1987), 610–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, C.The Mountain People. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1972Google Scholar
Wedgwood, R. “Conceptual Role Semantics for Moral Terms,” Philosophical Review 110 (2001), 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermarck, E.Ethical Relativity. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1932Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. “Truth, Invention and the Meaning of Life,” in Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987, 87–138Google Scholar
Williams, B.Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana, 1985Google Scholar
Williamson, T.Vagueness. London: Routledge, 1994Google Scholar
Williamson, T. “A Critical Study of Truth and Objectivity,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 1 (1993), 130–144Google Scholar
Wong, D.Moral Relativity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984Google Scholar
Wright, C.Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992Google Scholar
Wright, C. “Realism: Pure and Simple?,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2 (1994), 327–341Google Scholar
Wright, C. “Truth in Ethics,” in Hooker, B. (ed.), Truth in Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996, 1–18Google Scholar
Wright, C. “On Being in Quandary,” Mind 110 (2001), 45–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abreau, D. “On the Theory of Infinitely Repeated Games with Discounting,” Econometrica 56 (1988), 383–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M.Intention. Oxford: Blackwell, 1957Google Scholar
Asch, S. E.Social Psychology. New York: Prentice Hall, 1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A.Language, Truth and Logic. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1936Google Scholar
Bennigson, T. “Irresolvable Disagreement and the Case Against Moral Realism,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (1996), 411–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, L., and F⊘llesdal, D. “Interview with Donald Davidson,” Theoria 60 (1994), 207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. “Moral Realism,” in Casey, J. (ed.), Morality and Moral Reasoning. London: Methuen, 1971, 101–124Google Scholar
Blackburn, S.Spreading the Word. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. “Just Causes,” Philosophical Studies 61 (1991), 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S.Essays in Quasi-Realism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. “Attitudes and Contents,” reprinted in Essays in Quasi-Realism, 182–197
Blackburn, S. “Errors and the Phenomenology of Values,” reprinted in Essays in Quasi-Realism, 149–165
Blackburn, S. “The Flight to Reality,” in Hursthouse, R., Lawrence, G., and Quinn, W. (eds.), Virtues and Reasons. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995, 35–75Google Scholar
Blackburn, S.Ruling Passions. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998Google Scholar
Block, N. “Functional Role and Truth Conditions,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 61 (1987), 157–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, N. “An Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology,” reprinted in Stich, S. and Warfield, T. (eds), Mental Representation: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994Google Scholar
Bloomfield, P. “The Rules of ‘Goodness’: An Essay on Moral Semantics,” American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (2003), 197–213Google Scholar
BonJour, L.The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985Google Scholar
Boyd, R. “How to Be a Moral Realist,” in Sayre-McCord, G. (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988, 181–228Google Scholar
Brandt, R.Hopi Ethics: A Theoretical Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954Google Scholar
Brink, D. O.Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. “Individualism and the Mental,” in French, P., Uehling, T., and Wettstein, H. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979, 73–121Google Scholar
Burge, T. “Individualism and Psychology,” Philosophical Review 95 (1986), 3–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chagnon, N. A., and Hames, R. “Protein Deficiency and Tribal Warfare in Amazonia: New Data,” Science 203 (1979), 910–913CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chagnon, N.Yanomamö: The Fierce People (5th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt, 1997Google Scholar
Cohen, D., and Nisbett, R.Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996Google Scholar
Cohen, D., Nisbett, R., Bowdle, B., Schwarz, N. “Insult, Aggression, and the Southern Culture of Honor: An ‘Experimental Ethnography,’” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (1996), 945–960CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conee, E., and Feldman, R. “The Generality Problem for Reliabilism,” Philosophical Studies 89 (1998), 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, J.Morality and Cultural Differences. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999Google Scholar
Cooper, D. “Moral Relativism,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 3 (1978), 97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copp, D. “Milk, Honey, and the Good Life on Moral Twin Earth,” Synthese 124 (2000), 113–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copp, D. “Realist-Expressivism: A Neglected Option for Moral Realism,” Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2001), 1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, J.Moral Reasons. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993Google Scholar
Daniels, N. “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics,” Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979), 256–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S., Gibbard, A., Railton, P. “Toward Fin de siècle Ethics,” Philosophical Review 101 (1992), 115–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. “Toward a Unified Theory of Meaning and Action,” Grazer Philosophische Studien 11 (1980), 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D.Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984Google Scholar
Davidson, D.Expressing Evaluations, The Lindley Lecture, published as monograph. Lawrence: University of Kansas, 1984Google Scholar
Davidson, D. “A New Basis for Decision Theory,” Theory and Decision 18 (1985), 87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. “The Structure and Content of Truth,” Journal of Philosophy 87 (1990), 279–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. “On Quine's Philosophy', Theoria 60 (1994), 184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. “The Objectivity of Values,” in Gutierrez, C. (ed.), El Trabajo Filosofico de Hoy en el Continente. Bogota: Editorial ABC, 1995, 59–69Google Scholar
Davidson, D. “Objectivity and Practical Reason,” in Ullman-Margalit, E. (ed.), Reasoning Practically. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, 17–26Google Scholar
Davidson, D.Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. “The Myth of the Subjective,” reprinted in Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, 39–53
Davson-Galle, P. “Arguing, Arguments, and Deep Disagreements,” Journal of Informal Logic 14 (1992), 147–156Google Scholar
Doris, J. M., and Stich, S. P. “As a Matter of Fact: Empirical Perspectives on Ethics,” in Jackson, F., and Smith, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. “Objectivity and Truth. You'd Better Believe It,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 25 (1996), 87–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. “Reply to Critics.” BEARS, J. Dreier and D. Estlund (eds.), http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Philosophy/bears/homepage.html. Posted September 4, 1997
Dummett, M.Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth, 1978Google Scholar
Edney, J. “Freeriders en Route to Disaster,” Psychology Today 13 (1979), 80–112Google Scholar
Elster, J.The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, W. D., “‘Ought’ and Motivation,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 48 (1947–1948), 492–510Google Scholar
Feldman, R. “Logic, Meaning and Conceptual Role,” Journal of Philosophy 69 (1977), 379–408Google Scholar
Feldman, R. “Reliability and Justification,” Monist 68 (1985), 159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, H. “Logic, Meaning and Conceptual Role,” Journal of Philosophy 69 (1977), 379–408Google Scholar
Field, H. “The Deflationary Conception of Truth,” in MacDonald, G., and Wright, C. (eds.), Fact, Science and Morality, Oxford: Blackwell, 1986, 55–117Google Scholar
Foot, P.Virtues and Vices. Oxford: Blackwell, 1978Google Scholar
Frankena, W. “Obligation and Motivation in Recent Moral Philosophy,” in Melden, A. (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958, 40–81Google Scholar
F⊘llesdal, D. “The Status of Rationality Assumptions in Interpretation and in the Explanation of Action,” Dialectica 36 (1982), 301–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, W. B. “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1955–1956), 167–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, W. B.Philosophy and Historical Understanding. London: Chatto and Windus, 1964Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. “Assertion,” Philosophical Review 74 (1965), 449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A.Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990Google Scholar
Gibbard, A.Thinking How to Live. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003Google Scholar
Goldman, A. H.Moral Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1988Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I “What Is Justified Belief?,” in Pappas, G. (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979, 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowans, C. W. (ed.), Moral Disagreements: Classic and Contemporary Readings. London: Routledge, 1999Google Scholar
Grandy, R. “Reference, Belief and Meaning,” Journal of Philosophy 70 (1973), 439–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M. and Cohen, J. D. “An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment,” Science 293 (2001), 2105–2108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardin, G. “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science 162 (1968), 1243–1248Google ScholarPubMed
Hare, R.The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952Google Scholar
Hare, R. “A ‘Reductio Ad Absurdum’ of Descriptivism,” in Shanker, S. (ed.), Philosophy in Britain Today, London: Croom Helm, 1986, 118–136Google Scholar
Harman, G. “Moral Relativism Defended,” Philosophical Review 84 (1975), 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G.The Nature of Morality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977Google Scholar
Harman, G. “Moral Explanations of Natural Facts – Can Moral Claims Be Tested Against Moral Reality?,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (suppl.) (1986), 57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G. “Moral Philosophy and Linguistics,” in Brinkmann, K. (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th World Congress of Philosophy, Volume I: Ethics. Bowling Green, Ohio: Philosophy Documentation Center, 1999, 107–115Google Scholar
Harms, W. F. “Adaptation and Moral Realism,” Biology and Philosophy 15 (2000), 699–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M.Cannibals and Kings. New York: Random House, 1977Google Scholar
Harris, M. “Animal Capture and Yanamamo Warfare: Retrospect and New Evidence,” Journal of Anthropological Research 40 (1984), 183–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herskovits, M.Cultural Anthropology. New York: Knopf, 1955Google Scholar
Horgan, T., and Timmons, M. “New Wave Moral Realism Meets Moral Twin Earth,” Journal of Philosophical Research 16 (1990–1991), 447–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T., and Timmons, M. “Troubles on Moral Twin Earth,” Synthese 92 (1992), 221–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T., and Timmons, M. “From Moral Realism to Moral Relativism in One Easy Step,” Critica 28 (1996), 3–39Google Scholar
Horgan, T., and Timmons, M. “Copping Out on Moral Twin Earth,” Synthese 124 (2000), 139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, S. “Objectivity and Disagreement,” in Honderich, T. (ed.), Morality and Objectivity. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985, 54–97Google Scholar
Hurley, S.Natural Reasons, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989Google Scholar
Jackson, F.From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998Google Scholar
Jackson, F., and Pettit, P. “A Problem for Expressivism,” Analysis 58 (1998), 239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R.The Myth of Morality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. “Moral Realism and Teleosemantics,” Biology and Philosophy 16 (2001), 725–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S.Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980Google Scholar
Lehrer, K.Theory of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1990Google Scholar
Lenman, J. “The Externalist and the Amoralist,” Philosophia 27 (1999), 441–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. “Radical Interpretation,” Philosophical Papers (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983, 108–121Google Scholar
Lind, J. T. “Do the Rich Vote Conservative because They Are Rich?” http://folk.uio.no/jlind/papers/PartyInc.pdf
Loeb, D. “Moral Realism and the Argument from Disagreement,” Philosophical Studies 90 (1998), 281–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S. “Relativism in its Place,” in Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.), Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982, 261–305Google Scholar
Mackie, J.Ethics. Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin, 1977Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (ed.), Beyond Self-Interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990Google Scholar
McDowell, J. “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52 (Suppl.) (1978) 13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. “Values and Secondary Qualities,” in Honderich, T. (ed.), Morality and Objectivity. London: Routledge, & Kegan Paul, 1985, 110–129Google Scholar
Merli, D. “Return to Moral Twin Earth,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (2002), 207–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R.Moral Differences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R.Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984Google Scholar
Milo, R. D. “Moral Deadlock,” Philosophy 61 (1986), 453–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E.Ethics. London: Oxford University Press, 1912Google Scholar
Newton-Smith, W.The Rationality of Science. London: Routledge, 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E.Governing the Commons. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action,” American Political Science Review 92 (1998), 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D.Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984Google Scholar
Pettit, P. “Embracing Objectivity in Ethics,” in Leiter, B. (ed.), Objectivity in Law and Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 234–286Google Scholar
Pollock, J. L. “Reliability and Justified Belief,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (1984), 103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’,” in Mind, Language, and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975, 215–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” reprinted in From a Logical Point of View (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1961, 20–46Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. “Epistemology Naturalized,” in Ontological Relativity. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969, 69–90Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. “On the Nature of Moral Values,” reprinted in Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981, 55–66Google Scholar
Ross, W. D.The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1930Google Scholar
Ryan, J. “Moral Relativism and the Argument from Moral Disagreement,” Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (2003), 377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salwén, H.Hume's Law. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 2003Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. “The Many Moral Realisms,” in Sayre-McCord, G., (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988, 1–23Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. “Being a Realist about Relativism (in Ethics),” Philosophical Studies 61 (1991), 155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T.What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1999Google Scholar
Scheuler, G. F. “Modus Ponens and Moral Realism,” Ethics 98 (1988), 492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Scepticism (Julia Annas's and Jonathan Barnes's edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994
Shafer-Landau, R. “Ethical Disagreement, Ethical Objectivism and Moral Indeterminacy,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (1994), 331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. “Vagueness, Borderline Cases and Moral Realism,” American Philosophical Quarterly 32 (1995), 83–96Google Scholar
Sherif, M.The Psychology of Social Norms. New York: Harper & Row, 1936Google Scholar
Singer, P. “How Reliable are our Moral Intuitions?,” Free Inquiry 23 (2003), 19–20Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C.Ethics, Persuasion and Truth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984Google Scholar
Smith, M. “Objectivity and Moral Realism. On the Significance of the Phenomenology of Moral Experience,” in Haldane, J. and Wright, C. (eds.), Reality, Representation and Projection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 235–255Google Scholar
Smith, M.The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994Google Scholar
Sosa, E. “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge,” in French, P., Uehling, T. & Wettstein, H. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1980, 3–25Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. L.Ethics and Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1944Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. L.Facts and Values. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1963Google Scholar
Stout, J.Ethics After Babel. Boston: Beacon Press, 1988Google Scholar
Sturgeon, N. “What Difference Does It Make Whether Moral Realism is True?,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (Suppl.) (1986), 115–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgeon, N. “Moral Explanations,” reprinted in Sayre-McCord, G. (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988, 229–255Google Scholar
Sturgeon, N. “Contents and Causes,” Philosophical Studies 61 (1991), 19–37Google Scholar
Sturgeon, N. “Moral Disagreement and Moral Relativism,” Social Philosophy and Policy 11 (1994), 80–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tersman, F. “Utilitarianism and the Idea of Reflective Equilibrium,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (1991), 395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tersman, F. “Coherence and Disagreement,” Philosophical Studies 65 (1992), 305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tersman, F.Reflective Equilibrium. An Essay in Moral Epistemology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1993Google Scholar
Tersman, F. “Crispin Wright on Moral Disagreement,” Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1998), 359–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tersman, F. “Quine on Ethics,” Theoria 64 (1998), 84–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tersman, F. “Are We Lovers of the Good?,” Synthese 138 (2004), 247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, P.Darkness in El Dorado: How Scientists and Journalists Devastated the Amazon. London and New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2000Google Scholar
Tolhurst, W. “The Argument from Moral Disagreement,” Ethics 97 (1987), 610–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, C.The Mountain People. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1972Google Scholar
Wedgwood, R. “Conceptual Role Semantics for Moral Terms,” Philosophical Review 110 (2001), 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermarck, E.Ethical Relativity. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1932Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. “Truth, Invention and the Meaning of Life,” in Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987, 87–138Google Scholar
Williams, B.Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana, 1985Google Scholar
Williamson, T.Vagueness. London: Routledge, 1994Google Scholar
Williamson, T. “A Critical Study of Truth and Objectivity,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 1 (1993), 130–144Google Scholar
Wong, D.Moral Relativity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984Google Scholar
Wright, C.Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992Google Scholar
Wright, C. “Realism: Pure and Simple?,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2 (1994), 327–341Google Scholar
Wright, C. “Truth in Ethics,” in Hooker, B. (ed.), Truth in Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996, 1–18Google Scholar
Wright, C. “On Being in Quandary,” Mind 110 (2001), 45–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Folke Tersman, Stockholms Universitet
  • Book: Moral Disagreement
  • Online publication: 04 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570599.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Folke Tersman, Stockholms Universitet
  • Book: Moral Disagreement
  • Online publication: 04 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570599.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Folke Tersman, Stockholms Universitet
  • Book: Moral Disagreement
  • Online publication: 04 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570599.008
Available formats
×