Allalouf, A, Hambleton, RK, Sireci, SG 1999. “Identifying the causes of DIF in translated verbal items.” Journal of Educational Measurement 36: 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alzheimer‘s Association 2013. “2013 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures.” Alzheimer’s and Dementia 9: 208–245.Google Scholar

Arrendondo, GF, Vaillant, D 2004. “Mexicans,” in Grossman, JR, Keating, AD, and Reiff, JL (eds.) Encyclopedia of Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 532–534.Google Scholar

Austin, JL 1962. How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Axinn, WG, Pearce, LD 2006. Mixed method data collection strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayalon, L, Areán, PA 2004. “Knowledge of Alzheimer’s disease in four ethnic groups.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 19: 51–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bachman, LF 1990. Fundamental considerations in language testing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bachman, LF, Palmer, AS 1996. Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baer, RD, Weller, SC, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Glazer, M, Trotter, R, Pachter, L, Klein, RE 2003. “A cross-cultural approach to the study of the folk illness nervios.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 27: 315–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baer, RD, Weller, SC, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Salcedo Rocha, AL 2004. “A comparison of community and physician explanatory models of AIDS in Mexico and the United States.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 18: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baer, RD, Weller, SC, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Salcedo Rocha, AL 2008. “Cross-cultural perspectives on physician and lay models of the common cold.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 22: 148–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baer, RD, Weller, SC, Pachter, L, Trotter, R, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Glazer, M, Klein, R, Deitrick, L, Baker, DF, Brown, LF, Kahn-Gordon, K, Martin, SR, Nichols, J, Ruggerio, J 1999. “Cross-cultural perspectives on the common cold: Data from five populations.” Human Organization 58: 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakeman, R, Robinson, BF 2005. Understanding statistics in the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, CD 1984. “The search for adultness: Membership work in adolescent-adult talk.” Human Studies 7: 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, CD 2004. “Membership categorization and interview accounts,” in Silverman, D (ed.) Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice, 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, pp. 160–176.Google Scholar

Baker, CD, Johnson, G 2000. “Stories of courtship and marriage: Orientations in openings.” Narrative Inquiry 10: 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ballenger, J 2000. “Beyond the characteristic plaques and tangles: Mid-twentieth century U.S. psychiatry and the fight against senility,” in Whitehouse, PJ, Maurer, K, and Ballenger, J (eds.) Concepts of Alzheimer’s disease: Biological, clinical, and cultural perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 83–103.Google Scholar

Ballenger, JF 2006. Self, senility, and Alzheimer’s disease in modern America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barth, F 1969 [1998]-a. “Introduction,” in Barth, F (ed.) Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, pp. 9–38.Google Scholar

Barth, F 1969 [1998]-b. “Pathan identity and its maintenance,” in Barth, F (ed.) Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, pp. 117–134.Google Scholar

Barth, F 1975. Ritual and knowledge among the Baktaman of New Guinea. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Barth, F 1983. Sohar: Culture and society in an Omani town. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Barth, F 1987. Cosmologies in the making: A generative approach to cultural variation in inner New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barth, F 1993. Balinese worlds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Barth, F 1999. “Comparative methodologies in the analysis of anthropological data,” in Bowen, JR and Petersen, R (eds.) Critical comparisons in politics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barth, F 2007. “Overview: Sixty years in anthropology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 36: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batchelder, WH, Romney, AK 1988. “Test theory without an answer key.” Psychometrika 53: 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Battle, J 2002. Culture free self-esteem inventories, 3rd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar

Baumann, G 1996. Contesting culture: Discourse of identity in multi-ethnic London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Behling, O, Law, KS (eds.) 2000. Translating questionnaires and other research instruments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, T, Savage, M, Silva, E, Warde, A, Gayo-Cal, M, Wright, D 2009. Culture, class, distinction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, HR 2006. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 4th ed. New York: Altamira Press.Google Scholar

Bernard, HR (ed.) 2011. Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar

Blessed, G, Tomlinson, BE, Roth, M 1968. “The association between quantitative measures of dementia and senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects.” British Journal of Psychiatry 114: 797–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bloor, D 1997. Wittgenstein: Rules and institutions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bolden, GL 2009. “Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 974–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borgatti, SP 1994. “Cultural domain analysis.” Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 4: 261–278.Google Scholar

Borgatti, SP 2002. Netdraw software for network visualization. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar

Borgatti, SP, Everett, MG, Freeman, LC 2002. UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Boston: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar

Borgatti, SP, Haglin, D 2011. “Consensus analysis,” in Kronenfeld, D, Bennardo, G, De Munck, V, and Fischer, MD (eds.) A companion to cognitive anthropology. New York: Blackwell, pp. 171–190.Google Scholar

Borgatti, SP, Mehra, A, Brass, DL, Labianca, G 2009. “Network analysis in the social sciences.” Science 323: 892–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boster, JS 1985. “‘Requiem for the omniscient informant’: There’s life in the old girl yet,” in Dougherty, JWP (ed.) Directions in cognitive anthropology. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 177–197.Google Scholar

Boster, JS 1986. “Exchange of varieties and information between Aguaruna Manioc cultivators.” American Anthropologist 88: 428–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P 1971. “Intellectual field and creative project,” in Young, MFD (ed.) Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier-Macmillan, pp. 161–188.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P 1984. Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P 1988. Homo academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P, Passeron, Jean-Claude 1977. Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P, Wacquant, LJD 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bradburn, NM, Sudman, S 1979. Improving interview method and questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Breen, R, Rottman, DB 1998. “Is the national state the appropriate geographical unit for class analysis?” Sociology 32: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breivik, LE, Martinez-Insua, AE 2008. “Grammaticalization, subjectification and non-concord in English existential sentences.” English Studies 89: 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brennan, RL, Prediger, DJ 1981. “Coefficient kappa. Some uses, misuses, and alternatives.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 41: 687–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Briggs, CL 1986. Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Briggs, CL 2007. “Anthropology, interviewing, and communicability in contemporary society.” Current Anthropology 48: 551–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brislin, RW 1970. “Back translation for cross-cultural research.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1: 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R, Gilman, A 1960. “The pronouns of power and solidarity,” in Sebeok, TA (ed.) Style in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 253–276.Google Scholar

Bryman, A 2006. “Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done?” Qualitative Research 6: 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryant, FB, Yarnold, PR 1995. “Principle components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis,” in Grimm, L and Yarnold, PR (eds.) Reading and understanding multivariate statistics, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 99–136.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, M, Hall, K 2004. “Language and identity,” in Duranti, A (ed.) A companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 369–394.Google Scholar

Canale, M 1983. “From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy,” in Richards, JC and Schmidt, RW (eds.) Language and communication. London: Longman, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Canale, M, Swain, M 1980. “Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing.” Applied Linguistics 1: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caulkins, D, Hyatt, SB 1999. “Using consensus analysis to measure cultural diversity in organizations and social movements.” Field Methods 11: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chavez, LR, Hubbell, FA, McMullin, JM, Martinez, RG, Mishra, SI 1995. “Structure and meaning in models of breast and cervical cancer risk factors: A comparison of perceptions among Latinas, Anglo women, and physicians.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 9: 40–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chernilo, D 2006. “Social theory’s methodological nationalism: Myth and reality.” European Journal of Social Theory 9: 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chin, AL, Negash, S, Hamilton, R 2011. “Diversity and disparity in dementia: The impact of ethnoracial differences in Alzheimer disease.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 25: 187–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chun, KM, Organista, PB, Marin, G (eds.) 2003. Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicourel, A 1974. Theory and method in a study of Argentine fertility. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar

Clark, C, DeCarli, C, Mungas, D, Chui, H, Higdon, R, Nunez, J, Fernandez, H, Negron, M, Manly, J, Ferris, S, Perez, A, Torres, M, Ewbank, D, Glooser, G, van Belle, G 2005a. “Earlier onset of Alzheimer’s disease symptoms in Latinos compared with Anglo individuals.” Archives of Neurology 62: 774–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, HH, Gerrig, RT 1990. “Quotations as demonstrations.” Language 66: 764–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, HH, Schober, MF 1992. “Asking questions and influencing answers,” in Tanur, JM (ed.) Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys. New York: Russell Sage, pp. 15–48.Google Scholar

Clark, PC, Kutner, NG, Goldstein, FC, Peterson-Hazen, S, Garner, V, Zhang, R, Bowles, T 2005b. “Impediments to timely diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease in African Americans.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53: 2012–2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Comrie, B, Haspelmath, H, Bickel, B 2008. Leipzig Glossing Rules. Retrieved December 5, 2013, from www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php.Google Scholar

Connell, CM, Gallant, MP 1996. “‘Spouse caregivers’ attitudes toward obtaining a diagnosis of a dementing illness.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 44: 1003–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Connell, CM, Roberts, JS, McLaughlin, SJ 2007. “Public opinion about Alzheimer’s disease among blacks, hispanics, and whites.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 21: 232–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Connell, CM, Roberts, JS, McLaughlin, SJ, Akinleye, D 2009a. “Racial differences in knowledge and beliefs about Alzheimer’s disease.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 23: 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connell, CM, Roberts, JS, McLaughlin, SJ, Carpenter, BD 2009b. “Black and white adult family members’ attitudes toward a dementia diagnosis.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 57: 1562–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conrad, FG, Schober, MF, Schwarz, N 2014. “Pragmatic processes in survey interviewing,” in Holtgraves, T (ed.) The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 420–437.Google Scholar

Coon, DW, Rubert, M, Solano, N, Mausbach, B, Kramer, H, Argüelles, T, Haley, WE, Thompson, LW, … Gallagher-Thompson, D 2004. “Well-being, appraisal, and coping in Latina and Caucasian female dementia caregivers: Findings from the REACH study.” Aging and Mental Health 8: 330–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Corbin, J, Strauss, A 2007. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd ed. Walnut Creek, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E 1998. “Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech.” In LiSt: Interaction and Linguistic Structures 1: 1–28.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E 2004. “Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation: The case of new beginnings,” in Couper-Kuhlen, E and Ford, CF (eds.) Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistics studies from conversation. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 335–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creswell, JW 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Creswell, JW 2015. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Creswell, JW, Plano Clark, VL 2010. Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Creswell, JW, Plano Clark, VL, Gutmann, ML, Hanson, WE 2003. “Advanced mixed methods research designs,” in Tashakkori, A and Teddlie, C (eds.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 209–240.Google Scholar

Croot, EJ, Lees, J, Grant, G 2011. “Evaluating standards in cross-language research: A critique of Squires’ criteria.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 48: 1002–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Fina, A 2012. Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

DeJordy, R, Borgatti, SP, Roussin, C, Halgin, DS 2007. “Visualizing proximity data.” Field Methods 19: 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De la Mota, C, Butraqueno, PM, Prieto, P 2010. “Mexican Spanish intonation,” in Prieto, P and Roseana, P (eds.) Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language. Munchen: Lincom Europa, pp. 319–350.Google Scholar

de Saussure, F 1916 [1974]. Course in general linguistics. Bally, C and Sechahaye, A with Reidlinger, A (eds.) Translated by Baskin, W. London: Fontana.Google Scholar

Dewey, J 1925. Experience and nature. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger.Google Scholar

Dilworth-Anderson, P, Gibson, BE 2002. “The cultural influence of values, norms, meanings, and perceptions in understanding dementia in ethnic minorities.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 16: S56–S63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dressler, WW, Balieiro, MC, dos Santos, JE 2015. “Finding culture change in the second factor: Stability and change in cultural consensus and residual agreement.” Field Methods 27(1): 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drew, P, Heritage, J 1992. “Analyzing talk at work: An introduction,” in Drew, P and Heritage, J (eds.) Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–65.Google Scholar

Du Bois, JW 2007. “The stance triangle,” in Engelbretson, R (ed.) Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 139–181.Google Scholar

Du Bois, JW, Schuetze-Coburn, S, Cummings, S, Paolino, D 1993. “Outline of discourse transcription,” in Edwards, JA and Lampert, MD (eds.) Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Duranti, A 1997. Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, D 1994. “Script formulations: An analysis of event descriptions in conversation.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13: 211–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, D 1995. “Two to tango: Script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 319–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, D 1997. Discourse and cognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, D 2000. “Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4): 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, D 2003. “Analyzing racial discourse: The discursive psychology of mind-world relationships,” in Van den Berg, H, Wetherell, M, and Houtkoop-Steenstra, H (eds.) Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the research interview. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–48.Google Scholar

Eidhem, H 1969 [1998]. “When ethnic identity is a social stigma,” in Barth, F (ed.) Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, pp. 39–57.Google Scholar

Ember, CR, Ember, M 2009. Cross-cultural research methods, 2nd ed. New York: Altamira.Google Scholar

Ensink, T 2003. “The frame analysis of research interviews: Social categorization and footing in interview discourse,” in Van den Berg, H, Wetherell, M, and Houtkoop-Steenstra, H (eds.) Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary perspectives on research interviews. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 156–176.Google Scholar

Eriksen, TH 2010. Ethnicity and nationalism, 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Fabrigar, LR, Wegener, DT 2012. Exploratory factor analysis (Understanding Statistics). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Farr, M 2005. Latino language and literacy in ethnolinguistic Chicago. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feilzer, MY 2010. “Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4: 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fetters, MD, Curry, LA, Creswell, JW 2013. “Achieving integration in mixed methods designs–principles and practices.” Health Services Research 35: 2134–56.Google Scholar

Fickett, JG 1972. “Tense and aspect in Black English.” Journal of English Linguistics 6: 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foddy, W 1993. Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires: Theory and practice in social research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fontaine, JRJ 2008. “Traditional and multilevel approaches in cross-cultural research: An integration of methodological frameworks,” in Van de Vijver, FJR, Van Hemert, DA, and Poortinga, YH (eds.) Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 65–92.Google Scholar

Foucault, M 1965. Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason, translated by Howard, R. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Foucault, M 1970. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Foucault, M 1988. “Technologies of the self,” in Gutman, ML and Hutton, P (eds.) Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 16–49.Google Scholar

Fowler, FJ, Mangione, TW 1990. Standardized survey interviewing: Minimizing interviewer-related error. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, PJ 2000. “The role of the concept of Alzheimer’s disease in the development of the Alzheimer’s Association in the United States,” in Whitehouse, PJ, Maurer, K, and Ballenger, JF (eds.) Concepts of Alzheimer’s disease: Biological, clinical, and cultural perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Fries, CJ 2009. “Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology as a theoretical basis for mixed methods research: An application to complementary and alternative medicine.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3: 326–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, JM 2003. “The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garfinkel, H 1948 [2006]. Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action. Rawls, A (ed.). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Gee, JP, Michaels, S, O’Connor, MC 1992. “Discourse analysis,” in LeCompte, MD, Millroy, WL, and Pressle, J (eds.) The handbook of qualitative research in education. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 227–291.Google Scholar

Geertz, C 1973. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Glaser, B, Strauss, A 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Goffman, E 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Goffman, E 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Greenacre, MJ 2007. Correspondence analysis in practice. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, JC, Caracelli, VJ, Graham, WF 1989. “Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11: 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, HP 1975. “Logic and conversation,” in Cole, P and Morgan, J (eds.) Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar

Grossman, JR, Keating, AD, Reiff, JL 2004. Encyclopedia of Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Guba, E, Lincoln, Y 1989. Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Gubrium, JF, Holstein, J (eds.) 2002. Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Gubrium, JF, Holstein, JA, Marvasti, AB, McKinney, KD 2012. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. Walnut Creek, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Guest, A 2007. “Cultures of childhood and psychosocial characteristics: Self-esteem and social comparison in two distinct communities.” Ethos 35: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guillemin, F, Bombardier, C, Beaton, D 1993. “Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 46: 1417–1432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gumperz, J 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gurland, BJ, Wilder, DE, Lantigua, R, Yaakov, S, Chen, J, Killefer, E, Mayeux, R 1999. “Rates of dementia in three ethnoracial groups.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 14: 481–493.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haaland, G 1969 [1988]. “Economic determinants in ethnic processes,” in Barth, F (ed.) Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, pp. 58–73.Google Scholar

Hambleton, RK, Merenda, PF, Spielberger, CD (eds.) 2005. Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Hambleton, RK, Zenisky, AL 2011. “Translating and adapting tests for cross-cultural assessments,” in Matsumoto, D and Van de Vijver, FJR (eds.) Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–74.Google Scholar

Handwerker, P, Borgatti, S 2000. “Text analysis: Qualitative and quantitative methods,” in Bernard, HR (ed.) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 595–646.Google Scholar

Hanks, WF 1992. “The indexical ground of deictic reference,” in Duranti, A and Goodwin, C (eds.) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43–76.Google Scholar

Harkness, J 2003. “Questionnaire translation,” in Harkness, J, Van de Vijver, FJR, and Moher, P (eds.) Cross-cultural survey methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 35–56.Google Scholar

Harkness, J, Pennell, BE, Schoua-Glusberg, A 2004. “Survey questionnaire translation and assessment,” in Presser, S, Rothgeb, J, Couper, MP, Lessler, JT, Martin, E, and Singer, E (eds.) Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 453–473.Google Scholar

Harkness, J, Schoua-Glusberg, A 1998. “Questionnaires in translation.” ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial January: 87–126.Google Scholar

Harre, R, Gillet, G 1994. The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrits, GS 2011. “More than a method?: A discussion of paradigm differences within mixed methods research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 5: 50–66.Google Scholar

Hepburn, A, Wiggins, S (eds.) 2007. Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, J 1984. “A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement,” in Atkinson, JM and Heritage, J (eds.) Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–345.Google Scholar

Hinton, L, Franz, CE, Yeo, G, Levkoff, S 2005. “Conceptions of dementia in a multiethnic sample of family caregivers.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53: 1405–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, JS, Wardlow, H, Smith, DJ, Phinney, HM, Parikh, S, Nathanson, CA 2010. The secret: Love, marriage, and HIV. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ho, K 2009. Liquidated: An ethnography of Wall Street. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Holland, D, Quinn, N (eds.) 1987. Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holstein, JA, Gubrium, JF 1997. “Active interviewing,” in Silverman, S (ed.) Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice. London: Sage Publications, pp. 113–129.Google Scholar

Holt, E 1996. “Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29: 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holt, E 2000. “Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 425–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holy, L 1987. “Description, generalization and comparison: Two paradigms,” in Holy, L (ed.) Comparative anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Houtkoop-Steenstra, H 2000. Interaction and the standardized survey interview: The living questionnaire. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hruschka, DJ 2009. “Defining cultural competence in context: Dyadic norms of friendship among U.S. high school students.” Ethos 37: 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hruschka, DJ, Maupin, JN 2012. “Competence, agreement, and luck: Testing whether some people agree more with a cultural truth than others do.” Field Methods 25: 107–123.Google Scholar

Hruschka, DJ, Sibley, LM, Kalim, N, Edmonds, JK 2008. “When there is more than one answer key: Cultural theories of postpartum hemorrhage in Matlab, Bangladesh.” Field Methods 20: 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, SM, Bhopal, R 2004. “Self-report in clinical and epidemiological studies with non-English speakers: The challenge of language and culture.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 58: 618–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hutchby, I, Wooffitt, R 1998. Conversation analysis: Principles, practices, and applications. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hyman, HH, Cobb, WJ, Feldman, JJ, Hart, CW, Stember, CH 1954. Interviewing in social research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hymes, D 1972. “Toward ethnographies of communication: The analysis of communicative events,” in Giglioli, PP (ed.) Language and social context. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin, pp. 21–44.Google Scholar

Hymes, D 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Jaffe, A 2009a. “Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance,” in Jaffe, A. (ed.) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaffe, A (ed.) 2009b. Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, G 1989. “Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a “‘standard maximum’ silence of about one second in conversation,” in Rogers, D and Bull, P (eds.) Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 156–197.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G 2004. “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction,” in Lerner, GH (ed.) Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenks, CJ 2011. Transcribing text and interaction: Issues in the representation of communication data. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, RB, Onwuegbuzie, AJ 2004. “Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come.” Educational Researcher 33: 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, RB, Onwuegbuzie, AJ, Turner, LA 2007. “Toward a definition of mixed methods research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson-Laird, PN 1983. Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Johnstone, B 2008. Discourse analysis, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Johnstone, B 2009. “Stance, style, and the linguistic individual,” in Jaffe, A (ed.) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jucker, AH, Smith, SW 1998. “And people just you know, like ‘wow,’” in Jucker, AH and Ziv, Y (eds.) Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahma, N, Toikka, A 2012. “Cultural map of Finland 2007: Analyzing cultural differences using multiple correspondence analysis.” Cultural Trends 21: 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, SY 2006. “Measurement of acculturation, scale formats, and language competence.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 37: 669–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karasz, A 2005. “Cultural differences in conceptual models of depression.” Social Science and Medicine 60: 1625–1635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Katzman, R 1976. “The prevalence and malignancy of Alzheimer’s disease: A major killer.” Archives of Neurology 33: 217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Katzman, R, Bick, KL 2000. “The rediscovery of Alzheimer’s disease during the 1960’s and 1970’s,” in Whitehouse, PJ, Maurer, K, and Ballenger, J (eds.) Concepts of Alzheimer’s disease: Biological, clinical, and cultural perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 104–114.Google Scholar

Klassen, RM, Chong, WH, Huan, VS, Wong, I, Kates, A, Hannok, W 2008. “Motivation beliefs of secondary school teachers in Canada and Singapore: A mixed methods study.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 1919–1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klewitz, G, Couper-Kuhlen, E 1999. “Quote-unquote: The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences.” Pragmatics 9: 459–485.Google Scholar

Koven, M 2014. “Interviewing: Practice, ideology, genre, and intertextuality.” Annual Review of Anthropology 43: 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krippendorf, KH 2012. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, 3rd ed. Walnut Creek, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Krull, AC 2005. “First signs and normalizations: Caregiver routes to the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.” Journal of Aging Studies 19: 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, W 1972. Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Lai, J-S, Teresi, JA, Gershon, R 2005. “Procedures for the analysis of differential item functioning (DIF) for small sizes.” Evaluation and the Health Professions 28: 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landrine, H, Klonoff, EA 1995. “The African-American Acculturation Scale II: Cross-validation and short form.” Journal of Black Psychology 21: 124–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laroche, M, Kim, C, Hui, MK, Tomiuk, MA 1998. “Test of a non-linear relationship between linguistic acculturation and ethnic identification.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29: 418–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmann, C 1982. “Directions for interlinear morphemic translation.” Folia Linguistica 16: 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmann, C 2004. “Interlinear morphemic glossing,” in Booij, G, Lehmann, C, Mugdan, J, and Skopeteas, S (eds.) Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung 2. Halbband. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, pp. 1834–1857.Google Scholar

LePage, RB, Tabouret-Keller, A 1985. Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Le Roux, B, Rouanet, H 2004. Geometric data analysis: From correspondence analysis to structured data analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Leventhal, H, Nerenz, D, Steele, DJ 1984. “Illness representations and coping with health threats,” in Baum, A, Taylor, SE, and Singer, JE (eds.) Handbook of psychology and health: Vol. IV. Social psychological aspects of health. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 219–252.Google Scholar

Levinson, SC 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Licht, MH 1995. “Multiple regression and correlation,” in Grimm, LG and Yarnold, PR (eds.) Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 19–64.Google Scholar

Lichtman, MV 2013. Qualitative research for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Lieberman, ES 2005. “Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research.” American Political Science Review 99: 435–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Livney, MG, Clark, CM, Karlawish, JHT, Cartmell, S, Negron, M, Nunez, J, Xie, SX, Entenza-Cabrera, F, Vega, IE, Arnold, SE 2011. “Ethnoracial differences in the clinical characteristics of Alzheimer’s disease at initial presentation at an urban Alzheimer’s disease center.” American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 19: 430–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Malinowski, B 1922 [1984]. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar

Manning, C 2004. “African Americans,” in Grossman, JR, Keating, AD, Reiff, JL (eds.) Encyclopedia of Chicago. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 5–7.Google Scholar

Mathis, T, Yule, G 1994. “Zero quotatives.” Discourse Processes 18: 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsumoto, D, van de Vijver, FJR (eds.) 2011. Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maurer, K, Volk, S, Gerbaldo, H 2000. “Auguste D.: The history of Alois Alzheimer’s first case,” in Whitehouse, PJ and Maurer, K (eds.) Concepts of Alzheimer’s disease: Biological, clinical, and cultural perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 5–29.Google Scholar

Maxcy, SJ 2003. “Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism,” in Tashakkori, A and Teddlie, C (eds.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 51–90.Google Scholar

Miles, M, Huberman, A 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Mishler, E 1984. The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Morgan, DL 2007. “Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 48–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morse, JM 1991. “Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation.” Nursing Research 40: 120–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morse, JM, Niehaus, L 2009. Mixed methods design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar

Muhr, T 2004. Atlas.ti: The knowledge workbench (Version 5.0). Berlin: Scientific Software Development.Google Scholar

Müller, N (ed.) 2006. Multilayered transcription. San Diego: Plural Publishing.Google Scholar

National Research Council 2004. Critical perspectives on racial and ethnic differences in health in late life. Edited by the Panel on Race, Health, and Ethnicity in Later Life. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Neisser, U 1976. Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar

Neuendorf, KA 2001. The content analysis guidebook. Walnut Creek, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Nikander, P 2008. “Working with transcripts and translated data.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 5: 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ochs, E 1979. “Transcription as theory,” in Ochs, E and Schieffelin, B (eds.) Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 43–72.Google Scholar

Ochs, E 1990. “Indexicality and socialization,” in Stigler, JW, Shweder, RA, and Herdt, G (eds.) Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ochs, E 2004. “Narrative lessons,” in Duranti, A (ed.) A companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 269–289.Google Scholar

Ochs, E, Capps, L 2001. Living narrative: Creating lives in storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Office for National Statistics 2003. Ethnic group statistics: A guide for the collection and classification of ethnicity data. Retrieved on November 25, 2013 from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/index.html.Google Scholar

Ortiz, MA, Fitten, LJ, Cummings, LJ, Hwang, S, Fonseca, M 2006. “Neuropsychiatric and behavioral symptoms in a community sample of Hispanics with Alzheimer’s disease.” American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias 21: 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pachter, L, Weller, SC, Baer, RD, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Trotter, RT III, Glazer, M, Klein, R 2002. “Variations in asthma beliefs and practices among mainland Puerto Ricans, Mexican-Americans, Mexicans, and Guatemalans.” Journal of Asthma 39: 119–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Park, R 1921. “Sociology and the social sciences.” American Journal of Sociology 26: 401–424; 27: 1–21; 27: 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pavlenko, A 1999. “New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2: 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, DL, Clancy, KJ 1972. “Some effects of ‘social desirability’ in survey studies.” American Journal of Sociology 77(5): 921–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plano Clark, VL, Cresswell, J 2008. The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Platt, J 2012. “The history of the interview,” in Gubrium, JF, Holstein, JA, Marvasti, AB and McKinney, KD (eds.) The Sage handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 9–26.Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A 1986. “Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimating claims.” Human Studies 9: 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, GG, Plassman, BL, Burke, JR, Kabeto, MU, Langa, KM, Llewellyn, DJ, Rogers, MAM, Steffans, DC 2009. “Cognitive performance and informant reports in the diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia in African Americans and whites.” Alzheimer’s and Dementia 5: 445–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Potter, J 1996. Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric, and social construction. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, J, Hepburn, A 2005. “Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 2: 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, J, Wetherell, M 1987. Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Powers, WR 2005. Transcription techniques for the spoken word. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.Google Scholar

Purhonen, S, Gronow, J, Rhakoen, K 2011. “Highbrow culture in Finland: Knowledge and participation.” Acta Sociologica 54: 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Purhonen, S, Wright, D 2013. “Methodological issues in national-comparative research on cultural tastes: The case of cultural capital in the UK and Finland.” Cultural Sociology 7: 257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabbins, P 2004. “Research update: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI): Definitions, diagnosis, and treatment possibilities.” Advanced Studies in Medicine 4: 290–296.Google Scholar

Rallis, SF, Rossman, GB 2003. “Mixed methods in evaluation contexts: A pragmatic framework,” in Tashakkori, A and Teddlie, C (eds.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 491–512.Google Scholar

Randolph, J 2005. “Free marginal multirater kappa: An alternative to Fleiss’ fixed marginal multivariate kappa.” Paper presented at the Joensuu University Learning and Instructional Symposium (October 14–15, 2005), Joensuu, Finland.Google Scholar

Rapley, TJ, Antaki, C 1998. “‘What do you think about … ?’ Generating views in an interview.” Text 18: 587–608.Google Scholar

Redeker, G 1990. “Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rickford, JR 1999. African American vernacular English: Features, evolution, educational implications. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Riessman, CK 2008. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Roberts, JS, Connell, CM 2000. “Illness representations among first-degree relatives of people with Alzheimer’s disease.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 14: 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, JS, Connell, CM, Cisewski, D, Hipps, YG, Demissie, S, Green, RC 2003. “Differences between African Americans and Whites in their perceptions of Alzheimer’s disease.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 17: 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romney, AK, Batchelder, WH, Weller, SC 1987. “Recent applications of cultural consensus theory.” American Behavioral Scientist 31: 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romney, AK, Weller, SC, Batchelder, WH 1986. “Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy.” American Anthropologist 88: 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, R 1999. Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Ross, NO 2004. Culture and cognition: Implications for theory and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Roulston, K 2006. “Close encounters of the ‘CA’ kind: A review of the literature analyzing talk in research interviews.” Qualitative Research 6: 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, GW, Bernard, HR 2003. “Techniques to identify themes.” Field Methods 15: 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sacks, H 1985. “On doing ‘being ordinary’,” in Atkinson, JM (ed.) Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sacks, H 1987. “The preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation,” in Button, G and Lee, JRE (eds.) Talk and social organization. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sacks, H 1992. Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sacks, H, Schegloff, EA 1979. “Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction,” in Psathas, G. (ed.) Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, pp. 15–21.Google Scholar

Sacks, H, Schegloff, EA, Jefferson, G 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saito, S, Nomura, N, Noguchi, Y, Tezuka, I 1996. “Translatability of family concepts into the Japanese culture: Using the Family Environment Scale.” Family Process 35: 239–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sandelowski, M 2003. “Tables or tableaux? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies,” in Tashakkori, A and Teddlie, C (eds.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 321–350.Google Scholar

Sarangi, S 2003. “Institutional, professional, and lifeworld frames in interview talk,” in van den Berg, H and Houtkoop-Steenstra, H (eds.) Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the research interview. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–84.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, NC, Maynard, DW 1996. “From paradigm to prototype and back again: Interactive aspects of ‘cognitive processing’ in standardized survey interviews,” in Schwarz, N and Sudman, S (eds.) Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 65–88.Google Scholar

Schank, RC 1982. Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schank, RC, Abelson, RP 1977. Scripts, plans, goals, and understandings: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Schiffrin, D 1987. Discourse markers. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiffrin, D 1994. Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Schneider, EW 2004. A handbook of varieties of English: A multimedia reference tool. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Schrauf, RW 1997. “!Costalero quiero ser! Autobiographical memory and the oral life story of a Holy Week Brother in Southern Spain.” Ethos 25: 428–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrauf, RW 2002. “Comparing cultures within subjects: A cognitive account of acculturation as a framework for cross-cultural study.” Anthropological Theory 2: 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrauf, RW 2009. “Intracultural variation in cross-cultural gerontology.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 29: 115–120.Google Scholar

Schrauf, RW, Iris, M 2011a. “A direct comparison of popular models of normal memory loss and Alzheimer’s disease in samples of African Americans, Mexican Americans, and refugees and immigrants from the Former Soviet Union.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 59: 628–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schrauf, RW, Iris, M 2011b. “Using consensus analysis to investigate cultural models of Alzheimer’s disease,” in Kronenfeld, D, Bennardo, G, de Munck, V, and Fischer, MD (eds.) A companion to cognitive anthropology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 548–568.Google Scholar

Schrauf, RW, Iris, M 2012. “Very long pathways to diagnosis among African Americans and Hispanics with memory and behavioral problems associated with dementia.” Dementia 11: 726–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrauf, RW, Iris, M 2014a. “How to construct a case of Alzheimer’s disease in three languages: Case-based reasoning in narrative gerontology.” Ageing and Society 34: 280–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrauf, RW, Iris, M 2014b. “‘What they’re said to say’: The discursive construction of Alzheimer’s disease by older adults,” in Schrauf, RW and Muller, N (eds.) Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement. New York: Taylor and Francis, pp. 27–57.Google Scholar

Schrauf, RW, Navarro, E 2005. “Using existing tests and scales in the field.” Field Methods 17: 373–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrauf, RW, Sanchez, J 2008. “Using freelisting to identify, assess, and characterize age differences in shared cultural domains.” Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 63B: S385–S393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulz, R, Burgio, L, Burns, R, Eisdorfer, C, Gallagher-Thompson, D, Gitlin, LN, Feeney Mahoney, D 2003. “Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health (REACH): Overview, site-specific outcomes and future directions.” The Gerontologist 43: 514–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schuman, H, Converse, JM 1971. “The effects of Black and White interviewers on black responses in 1968.” Public Opinion Quarterly 35: 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarz, N 1996. Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Scott, J 2013. Social network analysis, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Searle, JR 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selting, M, Auer, P, Barth-Weingarten, D, Bergmann, J, Bergmann, P, Birkner, K, Couper-Kuhlen, E, Depperman, A, Gilles, P, Gunther, S, Hartung, M, Kern, F, Mertzlufft, C, Meyer, C, Morek, M, Oberzaucher, F, Peters, J, Quashoff, U, Schutte, W, Stukenbroch, A, Uhmann, S 2009. “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 GAT 2.” Gesprächsforschung 10: 353–402.Google Scholar

Shadlen, M-F, Larson, EB, Gibbbons, L, McCormick, WC, Teri, L 1999. “Alzheimer’s disease symptoms in blacks and whites.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 47: 482–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shaw, C 1999. “A framework for the study of coping, illness behaviour and outcomes.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 29: 1246–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shimpuku, Y, Norr, KF 2012. “Working with interpreters in cross-cultural qualitative research in the context of a developing country: Systematic literature review.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 68: 1692–1706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shulman, N, Adams, B 2002. “A comparison of Russian and British attitudes towards mental health problems in the community.” International Journal of Social Psychiatry 48: 266–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sidnell, J, Stivers, T (eds.) 2014. The handbook of conversation analysis (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Silva, E, Warde, A, Wright, D 2009. “Using mixed methods for analyzing culture: The cultural capital and social exclusion project.” Cultural Sociology 3: 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silverman, S 1993. Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for interpreting talk, text, and interaction. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Silverstein, M 1976. “Shifter, linguistic categories, and cultural description,” in Basso, KH and Selby, HA (eds.) Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11–56.Google Scholar

Silverstein, M 2003a. “Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life.” Language and Communication 23: 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silverstein, M 2003b. “Translation, transduction, transformation: Skating ‘glossando’ on thin semiotic ice,” in Rubel, PG and Rosman, A (eds.) Translating cultures: Perspectives on translation and anthropology. New York: Berg, pp. 75–105.Google Scholar

Silverstein, M 2004. “‘Cultural’ concepts and the language-culture nexus.” Current Anthropology 45: 621–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silverstein, M 2006. “Old wine, new ethnographic lexicography.” The Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sink, KM, Covinsky, KE, Newcomer, R, Yaffe, K 2004. “Ethnic differences in the prevalence and patterns of dementia-related behaviors.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 52: 1277–1283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, HJ, Chen, J, Liu, X 2008. “Language and rigor in qualitative research: Problems and principles in analyzing data collected in Mandarin.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 8(44). Retrieved on November 11, 2015 from www.biomedcentral.com/1471–2288/8/44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, TW 2004. “Evaluating cross-national survey instruments,” in Presser, S, Rothgeb, J, Couper, MP, Lessler, JT, Martin, E, and Singer, E (eds.) Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 431–452.Google Scholar

Spradley, JP 1979. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Squires, A 2008. “Language barriers and qualitative nursing research: Methodological considerations.” International Nursing Review 55: 265–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Squires, A 2009. “Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: A research review.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 46: 277–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stange, KC, Crabtree, BF, Miller, WL 2006. “Publishing multimethod research.” Annals of Family Medicine 4(4): 292–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stephenson, M 2000. “Development and validation of the Stephenson Multigroup Acculturation Scale (SMAS).” Psychological Assessment 12: 77–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stivers, T 2008. “Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41: 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strauss, S, Feiz, P 2014 Discourse analysis: Putting our worlds into words. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar

Suchman, L, Jordan, B 1990. “Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 232–241.Google Scholar

Swartz, D 1997. Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szczepek Reed, B 2011. Analysing conversation: An introduction to prosody. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taggart, F, Friede, T, Welch, S, Clarke, A, Johnson, M, Stewart-Brown, S 2013. “Cross-cultural evaluation of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS) – a mixed methods study.” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 11: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tannen, D (ed.) 1993. Framing in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tashakkori, A, Cresswell, JW 2007. “Exploring the nature of research questions in mixed methods research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tashakkori, A, Teddie, C 2010. SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tashakkori, A, Teddlie, C 1998. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Teddlie, C, Tashakkori, A 2009. Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Teddlie, C, Yu, F 2007. “Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Temple, B 1997. “Watch your tongue: Issues in translation and cross-cultural research.” Sociology 31: 607–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Temple, B 2002. “Crossed wires: Interpreters, translators, and bilingual workers in cross-language research.” Qualitative Health Research 12: 844–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Temple, B 2006. “Grasping at context: Cross-language qualitative research as secondary data analysis.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 7(4). Retrieved October 19, 2015 from www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/176/393.Google Scholar

Temple, B, Young, A 2004. “Qualitative research and translation dilemmas.” Qualitative Research 4: 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tennant, R, Hiller, L, Fishwick, R, Plant, S, Joseph, S, Welch, S, Parkinson, J, Secker, J, Stewart-Brown, S 2007. “The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation.” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 5: 63–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tourangeau, R, Rips, LJ, Rasinski, K 2000. The psychology of survey response. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trotter, R, Weller, SC, Baer, RD, Pachter, L, Glazer, M, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Klein, R 1999. “Consensus theory model of AIDS/SIDA beliefs in four latino populations.” AIDS Education and Prevention 11: 414–426.Google ScholarPubMed

Twinn, S 1997. “An exploratory study examining the influence of translation on the validity and the reliability of qualitative data in nursing research.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 26: 418–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Van den Berg, H 1996. “Frame analysis of open interviews on interethnic relations.” Bulletin de Methodologique Sociologique 53: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van de Vijver, F, Leung, K 1997. Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

van de Vijver, FJR, Leung, KK 2006. “Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures,” in Matsumoto, D and Van de Vijver, FJR (eds.) Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–45.Google Scholar

van de Vijver, FJR, van Hemert, DA, Poortinga, YH (eds.) 2008. Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Wallin, A, Ahlstrom, G 2006. “Cross-cultural interview studies using interpreters: Systematic literature review.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 26: 723–735.Google Scholar

Wasserman, S, Faust, K 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weeks, MF, Moore, RP 1981. “Ethnicity-of-interviewer effects on ethnic respondents.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Welch, LC, Botelho, EM, Tenstedt, SL 2011. “Race and ethnic differences in health beliefs about lower urinary tract symptoms.” Nursing Research 60: 165–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weller, S 1987. “Shared knowledge, intracultural variation, and knowledge aggregation.” The American Behavioral Scientist 31: 178–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weller, S 2007. “Cultural consensus theory: Applications and frequently asked questions.” Field Methods 19: 339–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weller, S, Mann, NC 1997. “Assessing rater performance without a ‘Gold Standard’ using consensus theory.” Medical Decision Making 17: 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weller, SC, Baer, RD, Garcia de Alba Garcia, J, Glazer, M, Trotter, R II, Salcedo Rocha, AL, Klein, RE, Pachter, LM 2015. “Variation and persistence in Latin American Beliefs about evil eye.” Cross Cultural Research 49: 174–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wetherell, M 2003. “Racism and the analysis of cultural resources in interviews,” in Van den Berg, H, Wetherell, M, and Houtkoop-Steenstra, H (eds.) Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the research interview. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar

Wetherell, M, Potter, J 1992. Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Whitehouse, PJ, George, D 2008. The myth of Alzheimer’s disease: What you aren’t being told about today’s most dreaded diagnosis. New York: Saint Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Wilce, JM 2009. “Medical discourse.” Annual Review of Anthropology 38: 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wimmer, A, Glick-Schiller, N 2002. “Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration, and the social sciences.” Global Networks 2: 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittgenstein, L 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wortham, SE 2001. Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar

Zentella, AC 1997. Growing up bilingual: Puerto Rican children in New York. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar