Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- A note on references
- Introduction
- Part I The ballet d'action in historical context
- 1 The voice and the body in the Enlightenment
- 2 A revival of ancient pantomime?
- 3 No place for Harlequin
- 4 Decroux and Noverre
- Part II The ballet d'action in close-up
- Conclusions
- Appendix
- Select bibliography
- Index
- References
4 - Decroux and Noverre
Distant cousins?
from Part I - The ballet d'action in historical context
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- A note on references
- Introduction
- Part I The ballet d'action in historical context
- 1 The voice and the body in the Enlightenment
- 2 A revival of ancient pantomime?
- 3 No place for Harlequin
- 4 Decroux and Noverre
- Part II The ballet d'action in close-up
- Conclusions
- Appendix
- Select bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
Étienne Decroux was in some senses the purest of all mime artists of the twentieth century, but he nevertheless regretted not exploring more fully the hybrid genre of the ballet d'action and its most famous practitioner and advocate, Jean-Georges Noverre. In Words on Mime, Decroux writes:
In the French edition of this book, I did not pay tribute to the memories of the Frenchman Noverre, nor to the German Jooss. Was this regrettable omission caused by their belonging to the world of dance? Certainly. But in their case, this cannot be considered a good reason. Noverre […] was primarily a dancer. But he worked with both theory and practice to build up a type of pantomime the character of which had previously been unknown. Jooss, also a dancer, placed himself outside dance and old-style pantomime. […] One day I hope to write further on the contribution made by these two ‘brothers’.
Decroux never did publish his thoughts on Noverre or Jooss. Other writers on mime have occasionally discussed Jooss in the context of Tanztheater, but Noverre is never mentioned. Nor, for that matter, are a host of other ballet d'action choreographers. Decroux's eminent position in the development of modern mime and the regrets he expresses that Noverre has been left out of the history of mime ought to give us pause for considerable thought. It seems appropriate, therefore, to evaluate the eighteenth-century missing link in the history of mime according to its relation to a modern touchstone, Decroux. The comparison reveals as many differences of technique and principle as it does similarities between the two, but it also shows that they shared a sense of what the challenges are.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Mime, Music and Drama on the Eighteenth-Century StageThe Ballet d'Action, pp. 84 - 112Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011