Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1975). On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist, 30, 1103–1126.Google Scholar

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Chatfield, C. (2016). The analysis of time series: An introduction. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (2013). Social psychology of culture. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner and Sons.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139–1150.Google Scholar

Dow, M. M. (2007). Galton’s problem as multiple network autocorrelation effects: Cultural trait transmission and ecological constraint. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 336–363.Google Scholar

Dow, M. M., & Eff, E. A. (2008). Global, regional, and local network autocorrelation in the standard cross-cultural sample. Cross-Cultural Research, 42, 148–171.Google Scholar

Eshel, G. (2011). Spatiotemporal data analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., & Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104.Google Scholar

Gilbert, G. M. (1951). Stereotype persistence and change among college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 245–254.Google Scholar

Greenfield, P. M. (2013). The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological Science, 24, 1722–1731. 7Google Scholar

Grossmann, I., & Varnum, M. E. (2015). Social structure, infectious diseases, disasters, secularism, and cultural change in America. Psychological Science, 26, 311–324Google Scholar

Hamamura, T. (2012). Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism-collectivism in the United States and Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 3–24.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

Huntington, S. P. (1997). The clash of civilisations. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Jebb, A. T., Tay, L., Wang, W., & Huang, Q. (2015). Time series analysis for psychological research: examining and forecasting change. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 727.Google Scholar

Karlins, M., Coffman, T. L., & Walters, G. (1969). On the fading of social stereotypes: Studies in three generations of college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 1–16.Google Scholar

Kashima, Y. (2005). Is culture a problem for social psychology? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 19–38.Google Scholar

Kashima, Y. (2008). A social psychology of cultural dynamics: Examining how cultures are formed, maintained, and transformed. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kashima, Y. (2014). How can you capture cultural dynamics? Frontiers in Psychology, 5(995), 1–16.Google Scholar

Kashima, Y. (2016a). Cultural dynamics. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 93–97.Google Scholar

Kashima, Y. (2016b). Culture and psychology in the 21st century: Conceptions of culture and person revised. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 4–20.Google Scholar

Kashima, Y. (2018). What is culture for? In Matsumoto, D. (ed.), Handbook of culture and psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kashima, Y., Bain, P., & Perfors, A. (2019). The psychology of cultural dynamics: What is it, what is known, and what is yet to be known? Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 499–529.Google Scholar

Kashima, Y., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). History of culture and psychology. In Kruglanski, A. & Stroebe, W. (eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Kashima, Y., & Kashima, E. S. (2003). Individualism, GNP, climate, and pronoun drop: Is individualism determined by affluence and climate, or does language use play a role? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 125–134.Google Scholar

Katz, D., & Braly, K. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koplenig, A., & Müller-Spitzer, C. (2016). Population size predicts lexical diversity, but so does the mean sea level: Why it is important to correctly account for the structure of temporal data. PLoS ONE, 11, 1–14.Google Scholar

Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model of social beliefs in multi-cultural perspective. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 36, pp. 118–197). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, D., & van de Vijver, F. J. (2010). Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Team, T. G. B., & Aiden, E. L. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331, 176–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631–659.Google Scholar

Naroll, R. (1961). Two solutions to Galton’s problem. Philosophy of Science, 28, 15–39.Google Scholar

Park, H., Twenge, J. M., & Greenfield, P. M. (2014). The Great Recession: Implications for adolescent values and behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 310–318.Google Scholar

Roberts, S., & Winters, J. (2013). Linguistic diversity and traffic accidents: Lessons from statistical studies of cultural traits. PLoS ONE, 8, 1–13.Google Scholar

Santos, H. C., Varnum, M. E., & Grossmann, I. (2017). Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science, 28, 1228–1239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Studying values: Personal adventure, future directions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 307–319.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Age and birth cohort differences in self-esteem: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 321–344.Google Scholar

Uz, I. (2015). The index of cultural tightness and looseness among 68 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 319–335.Google Scholar

Valente, T. W. (2010). Social networks and health: Models, methods, and applications (vol. 1), Oxford: Oxford University Press New York.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research (vol. 1), Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2011). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Van Hemert, D. A., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2015). Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Werner, O., & Campbell, D. T. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering. In A handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 398–420). American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar

Adams, B. G., & van de Vijver, F. J. (2015). The many faces of expatriate identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 49, 322–331.Google Scholar

Alter, A. L., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2009). Cultural sharing in a global village: Evidence for extracultural cognition in European Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 742–760.Google Scholar

Aydinli, A., & Bender, M. (2015). Cultural priming as a tool to understand multiculturalism and culture. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).Google Scholar

Bender, M., & Ng, S. H. (2009). Dynamic biculturalism: Socially connected and individuated unique selves in a globalized world. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 199–210.Google Scholar

Benet-Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005). Bicultural identity integration (BII): components and psychosocial antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73, 1015–1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benet-Martinez, V., & Hong, Y-y. (2014). The Oxford handbook of multicultural identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Benet-Martinez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. W. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 492–516.Google Scholar

Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5–34.Google Scholar

Berry, J. W. (2008). Globalisation and acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 328–336.Google Scholar

Bohner, G., Siebler, F., Gonzalez, R., Haye, A., & Schmidt, E. A. (2008). Situational flexibility of in-group-related attitudes: A single category IAT study of people with dual national identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 301–317.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who Is this “we”? Levels of collective Identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93.Google Scholar

Briley, D. A., Morris, M. W., & Simonson, I. (2000). Reasons as carriers of culture: Dynamic versus dispositional models of cultural influence on decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 157–178.Google Scholar

Buchtel, E. (2014). Cultural sensitivity or cultural stereotyping? Positive and negative effects of a cultural psychology class. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 39, 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, F. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1005–1018.Google Scholar

Chen, X., Leung, A. K., Yang, D. Y. J., Chiu, C-y., Li, Z., & Cheng, S. Y. Y. (2016). Cultural threats in culturally mixed encounters hamper creative performance for individuals with lower openness to experience. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1321–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheon, B. K., Christopoulos, G., & Hong, Y-y. (2016). Disgust associated with culture mixing: Why and who? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(10), 1268–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiao, C. Y., Harada, T., Komeda, H., Li, Z., Mano, Y., Saito, D., Parrish, T. B., Sadato, N., & Iidaka, T. (2010). Dynamic cultural influences on neural representations of the self. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1–11.Google Scholar

Chiu, C-y., & Cheng, S. Y-y. (2007). Toward a social psychology of culture and globalization: Some social cognitive consequences of activating two cultures simultaneously. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 84–100.Google Scholar

Chiu, C-y., Chia, S. I., & Wan, W. (2015). Cross-cultural measures of values, personality and beliefs. In Boyle, G., & Saklofske, D. H. (eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 756–772). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Chiu, C-y., Gelfand, M., Yamagishi, T., Shteynberg, G., & Wan, C. (2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 482–493.Google Scholar

Chiu, C-y., Gries, P., Torelli, C. J., & Cheng, S. Y-Y. (2011). Toward a social psychology of globalization. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 663–676.Google Scholar

Chiu, C-y., & Hong, Y. (2005). Cultural competence: Dynamic processes. In Elliot, A. & Dweck, C. S. (eds.), Handbook of motivation and competence (pp. 489–505). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Chiu, C-y., & Hong, Y. (2006). Social psychology of culture. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Chiu, C-y., & Kwan, L. Y-y. (2016). Globalization and psychology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 44–48.Google Scholar

Chiu, C-y., Mallorie, L., Keh, H-T., & Law, W. (2009). Perceptions of culture in multicultural space: Joint presentation of images from two cultures increases ingroup attribution of culture-typical characteristics. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 282–300.Google Scholar

Chiu, C-y., Morris, M., Hong, Y., & Menon, T. (2000). Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 78, 247–259.Google Scholar

Chiu, C-y., Ng, S. S-L., & Au, E. (2013). Culture and social cognition. In Carlston, D. (ed.), Oxford handbook of social cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cho, J.,. Morris, M. W., Slepian, M. L., & Tadmor, C. T. (2017). Choosing fusion: The effects of diversity ideologies on preference for culturally mixed experiences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 163–171.Google Scholar

Cui, N., Xu, L., Wang, T., Qualis, W., & Hu, Y. (2016). How does framing strategy affect evaluation of culturally mixed products? The self-other asymmetry effect. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2016, 47, 1307–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 55–75.Google Scholar

De keersmaecker, J., Assche, V. J., & Roets, A. (2016). Need for closure effects on affective and cognitive responses to culture fusion. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1294–1306.Google Scholar

Ferguson, G. M., Iturbide, M. I., & Gordon, B. P. (2014). Tridimensional (3D) acculturation: Ethnic identity and psychological functioning of tricultural Jamaican immigrants. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 3, 238–251.Google Scholar

Fischer, R. (2011). Cross-cultural training effects on cultural essentialism beliefs and cultural intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 767–775.Google Scholar

Fishbach, A., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Together or apart: When goals and temptations complement versus compete. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 547–559.Google Scholar

Fiske, A., Kitayama, S., Markus, H., & Nisbett, R. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 915–981). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Fu, H-y., Chiu, C-y., Morris, M. W., Young, M. (2007). Spontaneous inferences from cultural cues: Varying responses of cultural insiders and outsiders. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 58–75.Google Scholar

Fu, J. H.-Y., Zhang, Z.-X., Li, F., & Leung, Y. K. (2016). Opening the mind: Effect of culture mixing on acceptance of organizational change. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(10), 1361–1372.Google Scholar

Galloway, S. (2012). How Hollywood conquered the world (all over again). Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/02/24/how-hollywood-conquered-the-world-all-over-again/ on March 16, 2020.Google Scholar

Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Guan, M., Lee, F., & Cole, E. R. (2012). Complexity of culture: the role of identity and context in bicultural individuals’ body ideals. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18, 247–57.Google Scholar

Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713Google Scholar

Hao, J., Li, D., Peng, L., Peng, S., & Torelli, C. J. (2016). Advancing our understanding of culture mixing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1257–1267.Google Scholar

He, J., & van de Vijver, F. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2, 1–19.Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Science, 33, 61–83.Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. E. (eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Hong, Y., Benet-Martinez, V., Chiu, C-y., & Morris, M. W. (2003). Boundaries of cultural influence: Construct activation as a mechanism for cultural differences in social perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 453–464.Google Scholar

Hong, Y., & Chiu, C-y. (2001). Toward a paradigm shift: From cultural differences in social cognition to social cognitive mediation of cultural differences. Social Cognition, 19, 118–196.Google Scholar

Hong, Y., Chiu, C-y., & Kung, M. (1997). Bringing culture out in front: Effects of cultural meaning system activation on social cognition. In Leung, K., Kashima, Y., Kim, U., & Yamaguchi, S. (eds.), Progress in Asian social psychology (vol. 1, pp. 139–150). Singapore: Wiley.Google Scholar

Hong, Y., Ip, G., & Chiu, C-y., Morris, M. W., & Menon, T. (2001). Cultural identity and the dynamic construction of the self: Collective duties and individual rights in Chinese and American cultures. Social Cognition, 19, 251–268.Google Scholar

Hong, Y., Morris, M., Chiu, C-y., & Benet, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709–720.Google Scholar

Hsee, C. (2000). Attribute evaluability and its implications for joint-separate evaluation reversals and beyond. In Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (eds.), Choices, values and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.Google Scholar

Keh, H. T., Torelli, C. J., Chiu, C-y., & Hao, J. (2016). Integrative responses to culture mixing in brand name translations: The roles of product self-expressiveness and self-relevance of values among bicultural Chinese consumers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1345–1360.Google Scholar

Kesebir, P. (2011). Existential functions of culture: The monumental immortality project. In Leung, A., Chiu, C.-Y., and Hong, Y.-Y. (eds.), Cultural processes: A social psychological perspective (pp. 96–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kwan, L. Y.-Y., & Li, D. (2016). The Exception effect: How shopping experiences with local status brands shapes reactions to culture-mixed products. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1373–1379.Google Scholar

Kwan, L.Y-y., Yap, S., & Chiu, C-y. (2015). Mere exposure affects perceived descriptive norms: Implications for personal preferences and trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 48–58.Google Scholar

Leung, A. K-y., & Chiu, C-y. (2008). Interactive effects of multicultural experiences and openness to experience on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 376–382.Google Scholar

Leung, A. K-y., & Chiu, C-y. (2010). Multicultural experiences, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 723–741.Google Scholar

Leung, A. K-y., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C-y. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how? American Psychologist, 63, 169–181.Google Scholar

Leung, K., & Van De Vijver, F. (1996). Cross-cultural research methodology. In Leong, F. T. L. & Austin, J. T. (eds.), The psychology research handbook: A guide for graduate students and research assistants (pp. 351–358).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Li, D., Kreuzbauer, R., Chiu, C., & Keh, H. T. (2020). Culturally polite communication: enhancing the effectiveness of the localization strategy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51, 49–69.Google Scholar

Maddux, W. W., Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). When in Rome … Learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 731–741.Google Scholar

Maddux, W. W., and Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1047–1061.Google Scholar

Martin, L., & Shao, B. (2016). Early immersive culture mixing: The key to understanding cognitive and identity differences among multiculturals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1409–1429.Google Scholar

McGrath, J. E. (1981). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 25, 179–210.Google Scholar

Miyamoto, Y., Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2006). Culture and the physical environment: Holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances. Psychological Science, 17, 113–119.Google Scholar

Morris, M. W., Chiu, C-y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631–659.Google Scholar

Morris, M. W., Hong, Y-y., Chiu, C-y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 1–13.Google Scholar

Morris, M. W., Mok, A., & Mor, S. (2011). Cultural identity threat: The role of cultural identifications in moderating closure responses to foreign cultural inflow. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 760–773.Google Scholar

Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949–971.Google Scholar

O’Connell, L. (2019). Trends in global export volume of trade in goods from 1950 to 2018. Retrieved from www.statista.com/statistics/264682/worldwide-export-volume-in-the-trade-since-1950/ on March 16, 2020.Google Scholar

Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311–342.Google Scholar

Oyserman, D., Sorensen, N., Reber, R., & Chen, S. X. (2009). Connecting and separating mind-Sets: Culture as situated cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 217–235.Google Scholar

Peng, L., & Xie, T. (2016). Making similarity versus difference comparison affects perceptions after bicultural exposure and consumer reactions to culturally mixed products. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1380–1394.Google Scholar

Peng, L. Zheng, X., & Peng, S. (2017). The status quo of culture mixing research and its future directions. Advances in Psychological Science, 25, 1240–1250.Google Scholar

Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Robertson, R. (1995). Globalization: Time–space and homogeneity–heterogeneity. In Featherstone, M., Lash, S., & Robertson, R. (eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runkel, P. J., & McGrath, J. E. (1972). Research on human behavior: A systematic guide to method. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. J., Unger, J. B., Zamboanga, B. L., & Szapocznik, J. (2010). Rethinking the concept of acculturation. American Psychologist, 65, 237–251.Google Scholar

Shaxson, N. (2019). Over a third of world trade happens inside multinational corporations. Retrieved from www.taxjustice.net/2019/04/09/over-a-third-or-more-of-world-trade-happens-inside-multinational-corporations/ on March 16, 2020.Google Scholar

Shi, Y., Shi, J., Luo, Y. L. L., & Cai, H. (2016). Understanding exclusionary reactions toward a foreign culture: The influence of intrusive cultural mixing on implicit intergroup bias. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1335–1344.Google Scholar

Smeekes, A., McKeown, S., & Psaltis, C. (2017). Endorsing narratives under threat: Maintaining perceived collective continuity through the protective power of ingroup narratives in Northern Ireland and Cyprus. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5, 282–300.Google Scholar

Sui, J., Zhu, Y., & Chiu, C-y. (2007). Bicultural mind, self-construal, and recognition memory: Cultural priming effects on self- and mother-reference effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 818–824.Google Scholar

Thomson, R., Yuki, M., Talhelm, T., Schug, J., Kitos, M. Ayanian, A., Becker, J., Beckers, M., Chiu, C-y. et al. (2018). Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 115, 7521–7526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ting-Toomey, Stella. (2015). Identity negotiation theory. In Bennett, J. M. (ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of intercultural competence (pp. 418–422). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Torelli, C. J., Chiu, C-y., Tam, K-P., Au, A. K. C., & Keh, H. T. (2011). Exclusionary reactions to foreign cultures: Effects of simultaneous exposure to cultures in globalized space. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 716–742.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. (1961). Foresight and understanding. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506–520.Google Scholar

Tushman, M. L. (1977). Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 587–605.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Chasiotis, A. (2010). Making methods meet: Mixed design in cross-cultural research. In Harkness, J. A., Braun, M., Edwards, B., Johnson, T. P., Lyberg, L., Mohler, P. P., Pennell, B.-E., & Smith, T. W. (eds.), Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts. (pp. 455–473). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: an overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 119–135.Google Scholar

Verkuyten, M., & Pouliasi, K. (2002). Biculturalism among older children: Cultural frame switching, attributions, self-identification, and attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 596–609.Google Scholar

Wan, C., Chiu, C-y., Tam, K-p., Lee, S-l., Lau, I. Y-m., & Peng, S-q. (2007). Perceived cultural importance and actual self-importance of values in cultural identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 337–354.Google Scholar

Wong, R. Y., & Hong, Y. (2005). Dynamic influences of culture on cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma. Psychological Science, 16, 429–434.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. Retrieved from www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 on March 16, 2020.Google Scholar

Wu, Y., Yang, Y., & Chiu, C-y. (2014). Responses to religious norm defection: The case of Hui Chinese Muslims not following the halal diet. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 39, 1–8.Google Scholar

Yamagishi, T., Hashimoto, H., & Schug, J. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 18, 579–584.Google Scholar

Yang, D. Y. J., Chen, X., Xu, J., Preston, J. L., & Chiu, C-y. (2016). Cultural symbolism and spatial separation: Some ways to deactivate exclusionary responses to culture mixing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1286–1293.Google Scholar

Yang, K. S., & Bond, M. H. (1980). Ethnic affirmation by Chinese bilinguals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11, 411–425.Google Scholar

Zou, X., Tam, K-p., Morris, M. W., Lee, S-l., Lau, Y-m., & Chiu, C-y. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus vs. personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 579–597.Google Scholar

Allik, J., & Ralo, A. (2019). Culture and personality. In Matsumoto, D. & Hwang, H. C. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 397–438.Google Scholar

Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 495–508.Google Scholar

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1882.Google Scholar

Boer, D., Hanke, K., & He, J. (2018). On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research: A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 49, 713–734.Google Scholar

Bond, M. H. (1988). Social psychology across cultures: Two ways forward. In Adair, J. G., Belanger, D., & Dion, K. L. (eds.), Advances in Psychological Science: Social, Personal, and Cultural Aspects (vol. 1, pp. 137–150). Sussex: Psychology Press, Ltd.Google Scholar

Bond, M. H. (2019). Traveling from the past into the future of cross-cultural psychology: A personal-scientific journey. In Matsumoto, D. & Hwang, H. C. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bond, M. H., Leung, K., Au, A., Tong, K. K., Reimel de Carrasquel, S., Murakami, F., & Lewis, J. R. (2004). Culture-level dimensions of social axioms and their correlates across 41 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 548–570.Google Scholar

Bowden, S. C., Saklofske, D. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Sudarshan, N. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (2016). Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire across 33 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 53–60.Google Scholar

Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M. (1989). Multigroup comparisons and the assumption of equivalent construct validity across groups: Methodological and substantive issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 503–523.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M. (1991). The Maslach Burnout Inventory: Validating factorial structure and invariance across intermediate, secondary, and university educators. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 583–605.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872–882.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M. (2016a). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M. (2016b). Adaptation of assessment scales in cross-national research: Issues, guidelines, and caveats. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 5, 51–65.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T.L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 557–576.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1987). Adolescent self-concept: Testing the assumption of equivalent structure across gender. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 365–385.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107–132.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014). Factorial structure of the Family Values Scale from a multilevel-multicultural perspective. International Journal of Testing, 14, 168–192.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2017). The maximum likelihood alignment approach to testing for approximate measurement invariance: A paradigmatic cross-cultural application. Psicothema, 29, 539–551.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1961). The mutual methodological relevance of anthropology and psychology. In Hsu, F. L. (ed.), Psychological Anthropology (pp. 333–352). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar

Cheung, M. W-L., Leung, K., & Au, K. (2006). Evaluating multilevel models in cross cultural research: An illustration with social axioms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 522–541.Google Scholar

Chow, S-M. (2017). Bayesian estimation and modeling: Editorial to the second special issue on Bayesian data analysis. Psychological Methods, 22, 609–615.Google Scholar

Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2019). Alignment optimization: Estimation of the most trustworthy means in cross-cultural studies even in the presence of noninvariance. In Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Billiet, J., & Meuleman, B. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Clark, L. A. (1987). Mutual relevance of mainstream and cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 55, 461–470.Google Scholar

Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought: A psychological introduction. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Cooperrider, K., Marghetis, T., & Núñez, R. (2017). Where does the ordered line come from? Evidence from a culture of papua new guinea. Psychological Science, 28, 599–608.Google Scholar

Davidov, E. (2008). A cross-country and cross-time comparison of human values measurements with the second round of the European Social Survey. Survey Research Methods, 2, 33–46.Google Scholar

Davidov, E., Cieciuch, J., Mueleman, B., Schmidt, P., Algesheimer, R., & Hausherr, M. (2015). The comparability of measurements of attitudes towards immigration in the European Social Survey: Exact versus approximate measurement equivalence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 244–266.Google Scholar

Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 55–75.Google Scholar

De Bondt, N., & van Petegem, P. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the Overexcitability Questionnaire-Two applying Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling (BSEM) and multiple-group BSEM-based alignment with approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1963–1980.Google Scholar

Drasgow, F., & Kanfer, R. (1985). Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 662–680.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1972). Universal and cultural differences in facial expression of emotion. In Cole, J. R. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1971 (vol. 19, pp. 207–283). Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.Google Scholar

Ellefson, M. R., Ng, F. F.-Y., Wang, Q., & Hughes, C. (2017). Efficiency of executive function: A two-generation cross-cultural comparison of samples from Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Psychological Science, 28(5), 555–566.Google Scholar

Fang, X., Sauter, D. A., & Kleef, G. A. V. (2017). Seeing mixed emotions: The specificity of emotion perception from static and dynamic facial expressions across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 130–148.Google Scholar

Fischer, R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2018). Addressing methodological challenges in culture-comparative research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 691–712Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hoijtink, H., & Chow, S-M. (2017). Bayesian hypothesis testing: Editorial to the special issue on Bayesian data analysis. Psychological Methods, 22, 211–216.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144.Google Scholar

International Test Commission (2017). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). Retrieved from www.InTestCom.org.Google Scholar

Ion, A., Iliescu, D., Aldhafri, S., Rana, N., Ratanadilok, K., Widyanti, A., & Nedelcea, C. (2017). A cross-cultural analysis of personality structure through the lens of the HEXACO model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 25–34.Google Scholar

Ispas, D., Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., & Johnson, R.E. (2014). Exploring the cross-cultural generalizability of the Five-Factor Model of Personality: The Romanian NEO PI-R. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1074–1088.Google Scholar

Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426.Google Scholar

Kashima, Y. (2001). Culture and social cognition: Toward a social psychology of cultural dynamics. In Matsumoto, D. (ed.), Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 325–260). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kim, E. S., Cao, C., Wang, Y., & Nguyen, D.T. (2017). Measurement invariance testing with many groups: A comparison of five approaches. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 524–544.Google Scholar

Leung, K., Bond, M. H., de Carrasquel, S. R., Muñoz, C., Hernández, M., Murakami, F.,… Singelis, T. M. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286–302.Google Scholar

Lloyd, E. P., Hugenberg, K., McConnell, A. R., Kunstman, J. W., & Deska, J. C. (2017). Black and White lies: Race-based biases in deception judgments. Psychological Science, 28, 1125–1136.Google Scholar

Lonner, W., Keith, K., & Matsumoto, D. (2019). Culture and the psychology curriculum: Foundations and resources. In Matsumoto, D. & Hwang, H. C. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lun, V. M.-C., & Bond, M. H. (2016). Achieving subjective well-being around the world: The moderating influence of gender, age and national goals for socializing children. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 587–608.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.Google Scholar

Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., Abdelfattah, F., & Nagengast, B. (2014). The big fish-little-pond effect in mathematics: A cross-cultural comparison of U.S. and Saudi Arabian TIMSS responses. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 777–804.Google Scholar

Marsh, H.W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562–582.Google Scholar

Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the Big Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, D. (2006). Are cultural differences in emotion regulation mediated by personality traits? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 421–437.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, D., Grissom, R., & Dinnel, D. (2001). Do between-culture differences really mean that people are different? A look at some measures of cultural effect size. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 478–490.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, D. & Hwang, H. C. (eds.) (2019). Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2016). Culture and Psychology (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, D., Nezlek, J. B., & Koopmann, B. (2007). Evidence for universality in phenomenological emotion response system coherence. Emotion, 7, 57–67.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, D., & Yoo, S. H. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 234–250.Google Scholar

Mishra, R. C. (2001). Cognition across cultures. In Matsumoto, D. (ed.), Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 119–136). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Munck, I., Barber, C., & Torney-Purta, J. (2017). Measurement invariance in comparing attitudes towards immigrants among youth across Europe in 1999 and 2009: The alignment method applied to IEA, CIVED, and ICCS. Survey Methods Research, 47, 687–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munet-Vilaró, F., Gregorich, S. E., & Folkman, S. (2002). Factor structure of the Spanish version of the ways of coping questionnaire. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1938–1954.Google Scholar

Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313–335.Google Scholar

Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2014). IRT studies of many groups: The alignment method. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 978–985.Google Scholar

Neff, K. D., Tóth-Király, I., Yarnell, L. M., Arimitsu, K., Castilho, P., Ghorbani, N., & Mantzios, M. (2019). Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion scale in 20 diverse samples: Support for use of a total score and six subscale scores. Psychological Assessment, 31, 27–45.Google Scholar

Poortinga, Y. H. (1989). Equivalence of cross-cultural data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 737–756.Google Scholar

Poortinga, Y. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Joe, R. C., & van de Koppel, J. M. H. (1987). Peeling the onion called culture: A synopsis. In Kagitcibasi, C. (ed.), Growth and Progress in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 22–34). Berwyn, PA: Swets North America.Google Scholar

Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2000). HLM 5. Chicago: Scientific software.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. (1905). Observations on the senses of the Todas. British Journal of Psychology, 1, 321–396.Google Scholar

Robert, C., Lee, W. C., & Chan, K. Y. (2006). An empirical analysis of measurement equivalence with the INDCOL measure of individualism and collectivism: Implications for valid cross-cultural inference. Personnel Psychology, 59, 65–99.Google Scholar

Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 31–57.Google Scholar

Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2017). Multidimensional invariance in international surveys: Categorical indicators and fit measure performance. Applied Measurement in Psychology, 30, 39–51.Google Scholar

Santos, H. C., Varnum, M. E. W., & Grossmann, I. (2017). Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science, 28, 1228–1239.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In Kim, U. E. and Triandis, H. C. et al. (eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications (vol. 18, pp. 85–119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.Google Scholar

Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., & Herskovits, J. (1963). Cultural differences in the perception of geometric illusions. Science, 193, 769–771.Google Scholar

Singelis, T. M., Bond, M., Sharkey, W. F., & Lai, C. S. Y. (1999). Unpackaging culture’s influence on self-esteem and embarrassability. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 315–341.Google Scholar

Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structures between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229–239.Google Scholar

Svetina, D., & Rutkowski, L. (2017). Multidimensional measurement invariance in an international context: Fit measure performance with many groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 991–1008.Google Scholar

Tanaka-Matsumi, J. (2019). Abnormal psychology and culture. In Matsumoto, D. & Hwang, H. C. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 431–467). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thalmayer, A. G., & Saucier, G. (2014). The Questionnaire Big Six in 26 nations: Developing cross-culturally applicable Big Six, Big Five, and Big Two inventories. European Journal of Personality, 28, 482–496.Google Scholar

Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649–655.Google Scholar

Van de Schoot, R., Kluytmans, A., Tummers, L., Lugtig, P., Hox, J., & Muthén, B. (2013). Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: A comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 700–714.Google Scholar

Van de Schoot, R., Sijbrandij, M., Depaoli, S., Winter, S. D., Olff, M., & van Loey, N. E. (2018). Bayesian PTSD-trajectory analysis with informed priors based on a systematic literature search and expert elicitation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 267–291.Google Scholar

Van de Schoot, R., Winter, S.D., Ryan, O., & Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M. (2017). A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years. Psychological Methods, 22, 217–239.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2001). Evolution of research methods. In Matsumoto, D. (ed.), Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 77–97). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2004). Structural equivalence in multilevel research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 141–156.Google Scholar

Van Erp, S., Mulder, J., & Oberski, D. L. (2017). Prior sensitivity analysis in default Bayesian structural equation modeling, Psychological Methods, 23, 363–388.Google Scholar

Whiting, B. B., & Whiting, J. W. (1975). Children of Six Cultures: A Psycho-Cultural Analysis. Oxford: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Woehr, D. J., Arciniega, L. M., & Lim, D. H. (2007). Examining work ethic across populations: A comparison of the Multidimensional Work Ethic Profile across three diverse cultures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 154–168.Google Scholar

Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provisioin of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 110–116.Google Scholar

Yamagishi, T. (1988a). Exit from the group as an individualistic solution to the free rider problem in the United States and Japan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 530–542.Google Scholar

Yamagishi, T. (1988b). The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 265–271.Google Scholar

Yoo, J., Miyamoto, Y., Rigotti, A., & Ryff, C. D. (2017). Linking positive affect to blood lipids: A cultural perspective. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1468–1477.Google Scholar

Zercher, F., Schmidt, P., Cieciuch, J., & Davidov, E. (2015). The comparability of the universalism value over time and across countries in the European Social Survey: Exact versus approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers of Psychology, 6, 733–748.Google Scholar

Bagozzi, R. (2011). Measurement and meaning in information systems and organizational research: Methodological and philosophical foundations. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35, 261–292.Google Scholar

Baker, G., & Hacker, P. (1982). The grammar of psychology: Wittgenstein’s “Bemerkungen über die Philosophie der Psychologie.” Language and Communication, 2, 227–244.Google Scholar

Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815–824.Google Scholar

Boer, D., Hanke, K., & He, J. (2018). On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research: A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 713–734.Google Scholar

Borsboom, D. (2008). Latent variable theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 6, 25–53.Google Scholar

Bou Malham, P., & Saucier, G. (2014). Measurement invariance of social axioms in 23 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1046–1060.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107–132.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2017). The maximum likelihood alignment approach to testing for approximate measurement invariance: A paradigmatic cross-cultural application. Psicothema, 29, 539–551.Google Scholar

Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 420–445.Google Scholar

Fischer, R. (2017). Personality, values, culture: An evolutionary perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, A. J., Medaglia, J. D., & Jeronimus, B. F. (2018). Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, E6106-E6115.Google Scholar

Fischer, R. & Milfont, T. L. (2010). Standardization. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 89–97.Google Scholar

Fontaine, J. (2005). Equivalence. In Kempf-Leonard, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement (vol. 1, pp. 803–813). New York: Academic.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R., & Zenisky, A. (2011). Translating and adapting tests for cross-cultural assessments. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. (eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 46–73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

He, J., Bartram, D., Inceoglu, I., & van de Vijver, F. (2014). Response styles and personality traits: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 216–233.Google Scholar

He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). A general response style factor: Evidence from a multi-ethnic study in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 794–800.Google Scholar

He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015a). Effects of a general response style on cross-cultural comparisons: Evidence from the Teaching and Learning International Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 267–290.Google Scholar

He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015b). Self-presentation styles in self-reports: Linking the general factors of response styles, personality traits, and values in a longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 129–134.Google Scholar

He, J., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Domínguez Espinosa, A., Abubakar, A., Dimitrova, R., Adams, B., & Villieux, A. (2015). Socially desirable responding: Enhancement and denial in 20 countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 49, 227–249.Google Scholar

He, J., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Fetvadjiev, V. H., Dominguez-Espinosa, A., Adams, B. G., Alonso-Arbiol, I., & Zhang, R. (2017). On enhancing the cross-cultural comparability of Likert-scale personality and value measures: A comparison of common procedures. European Journal of Personality, 31, 642–657.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Jackson, D., & Messick, S. (1958). Content and style in personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 243–252.Google Scholar

Jackson, J. J., Wood, D., Bogg, T., Walton, K. E., Harms, P. D., & Roberts, B. W. (2010). What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the behavioral indicators of conscientiousness (BIC). Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 501–511.Google Scholar

Jang, S., Kim, E. S., Cao, C., Allen, T., Cooper, C. L., Lapiere, L. & Woo, J. M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale across 26 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 560–578.Google Scholar

Johnson, T., Shavitt, S., & Holbrook, A. (2011). Survey response styles across cultures. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. (eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 130–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maraun, M. D. (1998). Measurement as a normative practice: Implications of Wittgenstein’s philosophy for measurement in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 8, 435–461.Google Scholar

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. L. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.Google Scholar

Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.Google Scholar

Michell, J (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355–383.Google Scholar

Poortinga, Y. (1989). Equivalence of cross-cultural data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 737–756.Google Scholar

Poortinga, Y. H., & van de Vijver, F. (1987). Explaining cross-cultural differences: Bias analysis and beyond. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 259–282.Google Scholar

Rozin, P. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 2–14.Google Scholar

Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 173–212.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism and collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kağitçibasi, C., Choi, S. C., & Yoon, G. (eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In Vinken, H., Soeters, J., & Ester, P. (eds.), Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 43–73). Leiden, NL: Brill.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.Google Scholar

Selig, J. P., Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2008). Latent variable structural equation modeling in cross-cultural research: Multigroup and multilevel approaches. In van de Vijver, F. J. R., van Hemert, D. A., & Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 93–119). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 50–61.Google Scholar

Smith, P. B. (2011). Communication styles as dimensions of national culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 216–233.Google Scholar

Smith, P. B., & Fischer, R. (2008). Acquiescence, extreme response bias and culture: A multilevel analysis. In van de Vijver, F. J. R., van Hemert, D. A., & Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Multilevel Analysis of Individuals and Cultures (pp. 285–314). New York: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Smith, P. B., & Vignoles, V. L. (2017). Variations in response style by culture and by response format. Paper presented at the ninth regional congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar

Smith, P. B., Vignoles, V. L., Becker, M., Owe, E., Easterbrook, M., Brown, R. & Harb, C. (2016). Individual and culture-level components of survey response styles: A multi-level analysis using cultural models of selfhood. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 453–463.Google Scholar

Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics. In Stevens, S. S. (ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1–49). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Svetina, D., & Rutkowski, L. (2017). Multidimensional measurement invariance in an international context: Fit measure performance with many groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 991–1008.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–433.Google Scholar

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 4–69.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2000a). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 33–51.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2000b). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, methods and data analytic procedures. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. (eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 17–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 119–135.Google Scholar

Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M., Brown., R., & Bond, M. H. (2016). Beyond the “East-West” dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 966–1000.Google Scholar