Chapter Fifteen - The Third Phase: Material Inquiry into the Verifiability of Specific Concepts, and Conflict over the Implications of the Findings c.1990– c. 2020
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2021
Summary
Philosophy of History
Hayden White (1928– 2018)
White, writing in the mid-1980s, addresses specific topics in his systematic, hierarchical architectonic of historical thought. Essays that take up certain topics, such as that of individual historians, tangential to his work, or the problem of temporality in narrativity, narrativity as a story form,, enable him to probe deeply into how past and present issues were formulated, and in many instances seen as seminal to his present thought. Looking at one essay, published in 1987 by White, we can see how the third phase of conflict through material argument (evidence) and its implications are developed. In “The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory,” his views on narrative and temporality are presented, most deeply and clearly. White argues that the “form” of the narrative is always a “story.” Herodotus, of course, used his Greek term historia to mean both inquiry into the historical facts and a narrative “story” of what occurred. In this way, White's understanding, with the added dimension of how temporality is effected and how it affects thought, is that of Herodotus. The German language also has this bipolar meaning in the term “Geschichte,” which is both “history” and “story.”
White explains this conjunction of “story” and a chronology of factual occurrence beginning with a quote from Paul Ricoeur:
“The plot … places us at the crossing point of temporality and narrativity; to be historical, an event must be more than a singular occurrence, a unique happening. It receives its definition from its contribution to the development of a plot.”
According to this view, a specifically historical event is not one that can be inserted into a story wherever the writer wishes; it is rather a kind of event that can “contribute” to the “development of a plot.” It is as if the plot were an entity in process of development prior to the occurrence of any given event, and any given event could be endowed with historicality only to the extent that it could be shown to contribute to this process. And, indeed, such seems to be the case, because for Ricoeur, historicality is a structural mode or level of temporality itself.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Metahistory of Western Knowledge in the Modern EraFour Evolving Metaparadigms, 1648 to Present, pp. 231 - 242Publisher: Anthem PressPrint publication year: 2021