Book contents
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Masculinities of John MiltonCultures and Constructs of Manhood in the Major Works, pp. 190 - 213Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Primary Sources
Ames, William. The Workes of the Reverend and Faithfull Minister of Christ, William Ames. Early English Books, 1641–1700/48:01. London: Iohn Rothwell, 1643.Google Scholar
Ascham, Roger. The Schoolmaster (1570), ed. Ryan, Lawrence V.. Folger Documents of Tudor and Stuart Civilization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Brathwait, Richard. Times Treasury, or, Academy for Gentry Laying Downe Excellent Grounds, Both Divine and Humane. London: Nathaniel Brooke, 1652.Google Scholar
Burton, Robert. The Anatomy of Melancholy, ed. Faulkner, Thomas C., Kiessling, Nicolas K., and Blair, Rhonda L.. 6 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassarre. The Courtier of Count Baldessar Castilio, Done into English by Thomas Hobby. London: John Wolfe, 1588.Google Scholar
Cervantes Saavedra, Miguel de. The Second Part of the History of the Valorous and Witty Knight-Errant, Don Quixote of the Mançha. Written in Spanish by Michael Ceruantes: And Now Translated into English. London: Edward Blount, 1620.Google Scholar
Charles, I. Eikon Basilike: The Portraiture of His Sacred Majesty in His Solitudes and Sufferings: With Selections from Eikonoklastes, ed. Daems, Jim and Nelson, Holly Faith. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Editions, 2006.Google Scholar
Charles I and Parliament. The Kings Cabinet Opened: Or, Certain Packets of Secret Letters & Papers, Written with the Kings Own Hand, and Taken in His Cabinet at Nasby-Field, June 14. 1645 … Together, with Some Annotations Thereupon. Published by Speciall Order of the Parliament. London: Robert Bostock, 1645.Google Scholar
Churchyard, Thomas. A Sparke of Frendship and Warme Goodwill, That Shewest the Effect of True Affection and Vnfoldes the Finenesse of This World. Written by Thomas Chvrchyard Gent. London: T. Orwen, 1588.Google Scholar
Clarke, William. The Clarke Papers, ed. Firth, Charles Harding. 4 vols. London: Camden Society, 1891.Google Scholar
Comenius, Johann Amos. A Reformation of Schooles, Designed in Two Excellent Treatises … Translated into English, and Published by Samuel Hartlib. London: Michael Sparke, 1642.Google Scholar
Della Casa, Giovanni. The Refin’d Courtier, Or, A Correction of Several Indecencies Crept into Civil Conversation [Galateo]. London: Richard Royston, 1679.Google Scholar
Diggs, Dudley. The Vnlavvfulnesse of Subjects Taking up Armes against Their Soveraigne in What Case Soever Together with an Answer to All Objections Scattered in Their Severall Bookes. Oxford: n.p., 1643.Google Scholar
Dorke, William. A Tipe or Figure of Friendship. Wherein Is Liuelie, and Compendiouslie Expressed, the Right Nature and Propertie of a Perfect and True Friend. Also a Conclusion at the End in the Praise of Friendship. London: Thomas Orwin and Henry Kirkham, 1589.Google Scholar
Elyot, Thomas. A Critical Edition of Sir Thomas Elyot’s the Boke Named the Governour, ed. Rude, Donald Warren. New York: Garland Publishing, 1992.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Libellus de Conscribendis Epistolis Autore D. Erasmo. Cambridge, UK: Ioannem Siberch, 1521.Google Scholar
Finch, Martin. A Manuall of Practical Divinity for the Benefit of Weak Christians; the Informing Their Judgements, the Quickning Their Affections, and Directing Their Conversation. London: Thomas Brewster, 1658.Google Scholar
Fox, George. Concerning the Upright and Good Conversation of the Saints in Christ and in Heaven. London: John Bringhurst, 1682.Google Scholar
Fuller, Thomas. The History of the Worthies of England Who for Parts and Learning Have Been Eminent in the Several Counties: Together with an Historical Narrative of the Native Commodities and Rarities in Each County, ed. Fuller, John. London: W. G., 1662.Google Scholar
Fuller, Thomas. A Pisgah-Sight of Palestine and the Confines Thereof with the History of the Old and New Testament Acted Thereon. London: John Williams, 1650.Google Scholar
Guazzo, Stefano. The Ciuile Conuersation of M. Stephen Guazzo, Now Translated out of Italian into English by Barth. Young, of the Middle Temple, Gent. London: Thomas East, 1586.Google Scholar
Jermin, Michael. The Fathers Institution of His Childe Directing the Conversation of His Whole Life, in Respect of God. And of Other People. And of Himself. London: Ralph Wood, 1658.Google Scholar
Lambarde, William. A Perambulation of Kent Conteining the Description, Hystorie, and Customes of That Shyre. Collected and Written (for the Most Part) in the Yeare. 1570. By William Lambard of Lincolnes Inne Gent. And Nowe Increased by the Addition of Some Things Which the Authour Him Selfe Hath Obserued since That Time. London: Ralphe Newberie, 1576.Google Scholar
Lukin, Henry. The Practice of Godlines, or, Brief Rules Directing Christians How to Keep Their Hearts in a Constant Holy Frame and How to Order Their Conversation Aright. London: Tho. Underhill, 1658.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Complete Poems and Major Prose, ed. Hughes, Merritt Y.. New York: Macmillan, 1957.Google Scholar
Milton, John. The Divorce Tracts of John Milton: Texts and Contexts, ed. van den Berg, Sara J. and Howard, W. Scott. Medieval and Renaissance Literary Studies. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Milton, John. John Milton: Complete Prose Works, ed. Wolfe, Don M.. 8 vols. London: Yale University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Milton, John. The Major Works, ed. Orgel, Stephen and Goldberg, Jonathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Mulcaster, Richard. Mulcaster’s Elementarie, ed. Champagnac, Ernest Trafford. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925.Google Scholar
Perkins, William. Christian Oeconomie: Or, a Short Survey of the Right Manner of Erecting and Ordering a Familie According to the Scriptures, ed. Pickering, Thomas. London: Edmund Weaver, 1609.Google Scholar
Philips, Katherine. The Collected Works of Katherine Philips: The Matchless Orinda, ed. Thomas, Patrick. Stump Cross, UK: Stump Cross Books, 1990.Google Scholar
Prynne, William. Hidden Workes of Darkenes Brought to Publike Light, or, a Necessary Introdvction to the History of the Archbishop of Canterbvrie’s Triall Discovering to the World the Severall Secret Dangerous Plots, Practices, Proceedings of the Pope and His Confederates, Both at Home and in Forraigne Parts, to Undermine the Protestant Religion, Usher the Whole Body of Popery into Our Church, and Reduce All Our Realms to Their Ancient Vassalage to the Sea of Rome. London: Michael Sparke, 1645.Google Scholar
Puttenham, George. The Arte of English Poesie Contriued into Three Bookes. London: Richard Field, 1589.Google Scholar
S. C. The Art of Complaisance, or, the Means to Oblige in Conversation. London: John Starkey, 1673.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Henry V, ed. Mardock, James D.. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Two Gentlemen of Verona. In The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works. 2nd ed., ed. Wells, Stanley, Taylor, Gary, Jowett, John, and Montgomery, William. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005c, 1–28.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip. Astrophil and Stella. In Sir Philip Sidney: The Major Works, ed. Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, 153–211.Google Scholar
Symmons, Edward. A Vindication of King Charles: Or, a Loyal Subjects Duty Manifested in Vindicating His Soveraigne from Those Aspersions Cast Upon Him by Certaine Persons, in a Scandalous Libel, Entituled, the Kings Cabinet Opened: And Published (as They Say) by Authority of Parliament. Whereunto Is Added, a True Parallel Betwixt the Sufferings of Our Saviour and Our Soveraign, in Divers Particulars. London: Thomas James, 1648.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jeremy. Holy Living and Holy Dying, ed. Stanwood, Paul G.. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jeremy. The Measures and Offices of Friendship with Rules of Conducting it: To Which Are Added, Two Letters Written to Persons Newly Changed in Their Religion. London: R. Royston, 1657.Google Scholar
Udall, Ephraim. The Good of Peace and Ill of Vvarre, Set Forth in a Sermon Preached in the Cathedrall Church of S. Paul, the Last Day of July, 1642. London: C. Meridith, 1642.Google Scholar
Vincent, Thomas. Godlinesse in Principle and Conversation a Necessary Preparative to the Worlds Dissolution and the Escaping of Future Burnings. London: George Calvert, 1670.Google Scholar
Vives, Juan Luis. The Instruction of a Christen Woman, ed. Beauchamp, Virginia Wolcott, Hageman, Elizabeth H. and Mikesell, Margaret. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Westminster Assembly. The Humble Advice of the Assembly of Divines Now by Authority of Parliament Sitting at Westminster Concerning a Confession of Faith with the Quotations and Texts of Scripture Annexed: Presented by Them Lately to Both Houses of Parliament. London: Robert Bostock, 1648.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas. The Art of Rhetorique for the Use of All Such as Are Studious of Eloquence. London: George Robinson, 1585.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Achinstein, Sharon. “Early Modern Marriage in a Secular Age: Beyond the Sexual Contract.” In Milton in the Long Restoration, ed. Hoxby, Blair and Coiro, Ann Baynes, 365–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Achinstein, Sharon. “Medea’s Dilemma: Politics and Passion in Milton’s Divorce Tracts.” In Rethinking Historicism from Shakespeare to Milton, ed. Coiro, Ann Baynes, Fulton, Thomas, and Smith, Nigel, 181–208. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Achinstein, Sharon. “Milton’s Political Ontology of the Human.” ELH: English Literary History 84, no. 3 (2017): 591–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achinstein, Sharon. “Saints or Citizens? Ideas of Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Republicanism.” The Seventeenth Century 25, no. 2 (2010): 240–64.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael. “Divine Instruction: Of Education and the Pedagogy of Raphael, Michael, and the Father.” Milton Quarterly 26, no. 4 (1992): 113–21.Google Scholar
Amussen, Susan. “Gender, Family, and the Social Order, 1560–1725.” In Order and Disorder in Early Modern England, ed. Fletcher, Anthony and Stevenson, John, 196–217. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar
Arnold, John, and Brady, Sean, eds. What Is Masculinity? Historical Dynamics from Antiquity to the Contemporary World. New York; Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Baker, David J. Between Nations: Shakespeare, Spenser, Marvell, and the Question of Britain. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Barnaby, Andrew. “Debt Immense: The Freudian Satan, Yet Once More.” Milton Studies 60, nos. 1–2 (2018): 183–207.Google Scholar
Barton, Carol. “‘They Also Perform the Duties of a Servant Who Only Remain Erect on Their Feet in a Specified Place in Readiness to Receive Orders’: The Dynamics of Stasis in ‘Sonnet XIX’ (‘When I Consider How My Light Is Spent.’).” Milton Quarterly 32, no. 4 (1998): 109–22.Google Scholar
Bates, Brian. “Wordsworth, Milton, and Parodic Sonnets.” Appositions: Studies in Renaissance/Early Modern Literature & Culture 1 (2008): 15–18.Google Scholar
Benedictis, Michele de. “‘In the Head of the Worthiest Women’: Amazon Queens and Performing Heroines in Jacobean Court Masques.” Gender Studies 11, no. 1 (2012): 53–68.Google Scholar
Bennett, Joan S. “Dalila, Eve, and the ‘Concept of Woman’ in Milton’s Radical Christian Humanism.” In Arenas of Conflict: Milton and the Unfettered Mind, ed. McColgan, Kristin Pruitt and Durham, Charles W., 251–60. Cranbury, NJ: Susquehanna University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bennett, Joan S. “Liberty under the Law: The Chorus and the Meaning of Samson Agonistes.” Milton Studies 12 (1978): 141–63.Google Scholar
Bennett, Judith M. History Matters: Patriarchy and the Challenge of Feminism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Berlant, Laura. The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Berry, Philippa. Of Chastity and Power: Elizabethan Literature and the Unmarried Queen. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Biberman, Matthew. Masculinity, Anti-Semitism and Early Modern English Literature: From the Satanic to the Effeminate Jew. Women and Gender in the Early Modern World. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
Biberman, Matthew. “Milton, Marriage, and a Woman’s Right to Divorce.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 39, no. 1 (1999): 131–53.Google Scholar
Blenner-Hassett, Roland. “Geoffrey of Monmouth and Milton’s Comus.” Modern Language Notes 64, no. 5 (1949): 315–18.Google Scholar
Boehrer, Bruce. “‘Female for Race’: Euhemerism and the Augustinian Doctrine of Marriage in Paradise Lost.” South Atlantic Review 61, no. 4 (1996): 23–37.Google Scholar
Boehrer, Bruce. “‘Lycidas’: The Pastoral Elegy as Same-Sex Epithalamium.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 117, no. 2 (2002): 222–36.Google Scholar
Bray, Alan. Homosexuality in Renaissance England. Between Men-Between Women: Lesbian and Gay Studies. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Breasted, Barbara. “‘Comus’ and the ‘Castlehaven Scandal,’” Milton Studies 3, no. 1 (1971): 201–24.Google Scholar
Bredbeck, Gregory W. “Milton's Ganymede: Negotiations of Homoerotic Tradition in Paradise Regained.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 106, no. 2 (1991): 262–76.Google Scholar
Breitenberg, Mark. Anxious Masculinity in Early Modern England. Cambridge Studies in Renaissance Literature and Culture. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Broaddus, James W. “‘Gums of Glutinous Heat’ in Milton’s Mask and Spenser’s Faerie Queene.” Milton Quarterly 37, no. 4 (2003): 205–14.Google Scholar
Bromley, James M., Stockton, Will, and Traub, Valerie, eds. Sex before Sex: Figuring the Act in Early Modern England. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broomhall, Susan, and Van Gent, Jacqueline, eds. Governing Masculinities in the Early Modern Period: Regulating Selves and Others. Burlington, VT; Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
Brown, Cedric C. “John Milton and Charles Diodati: Reading the Textual Exchanges of Friends.” Milton Quarterly 45, no. 2 (2011): 73–94.Google Scholar
Brown, Cedric C. “Presidential Travels and Instructive Augury in Milton’s Ludlow Masque.” Milton Quarterly 21, no. 4 (1987): 1–12.Google Scholar
Brown, Cedric C., and Zwicker, Steven N., “‘This Islands Watchful Centinel’: Anti-Catholicism and Proto-Whiggery in Milton and Marvell.” In English Literature 1650–1740, ed. Zwicker, Steven N., 165–84. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bryson, Anna. From Courtesy to Civility: Changing Codes of Conduct in Early Modern England. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bryson, Michael. “The Gnostic Milton: Salvation and Divine Similitude in Paradise Regained.” In The New Milton Criticism, ed. Herman, Peter C., Sauer, Elizabeth, and Wittreich, Joseph A., 102–19. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. The Art of Conversation. Kindle e-book. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Bushnell, Rebecca W. A Culture of Teaching: Early Modern Humanism in Theory and Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Butler, Todd. “Milton, Deliberative Liberty, and the Law of Spousal Privileges.” Milton Studies 59 (2018): 231–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Gordon. John Milton. Very Interesting People 12. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Campbell, Gordon, and Corns, Thomas N.. John Milton: Life, Work, and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Carey, John. “Milton’s Satan.” In The Cambridge Companion to Milton, ed. Danielson, Dennis, 160–74. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Chaplin, Gregory. “Milton against Servitude: Classical Friendship, Tyranny, and the Law of Nature.” In Discourses and Representations of Friendship in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1700, ed. Lochman, Daniel T., López, Maritere, and Hutson, Lorna, 209–23. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
Chaplin, Gregory. “‘One Flesh, One Heart, One Soul’: Renaissance Friendship and Miltonic Marriage.” Modern Philology 99, no. 2 (2001): 266–92.Google Scholar
Chapman, Alison. “Roman Law and Equity in John Milton’s Divorce Tracts.” Critical Analysis of Law: An International & Interdisciplinary Law Review 5, no. 2 (2018): 27–43.Google Scholar
Chernaik, Warren. “Tragic Freedom in Samson Agonistes.” The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms 17, no. 2 (2012): 197–211.Google Scholar
Chernaik, Warren. “Victory’s Crest: Milton, the English Nation, and Cromwell.” In Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England, ed. Loewenstein, David and Stevens, Paul, 73–114. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Cleland, Katharine. “‘Warring Spirits’: Martial Heroism and Anxious Masculinity in Milton’s Paradise Lost.” In Violent Masculinities: Male Aggression in Early Modern Texts and Culture, ed. Feather, Jennifer, Thomas, Catherine E., and Kahn, Coppélia, 129–48. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Coffey, John. “Pacifist, Quietist, or Patient Militant? John Milton and the Restoration.” Milton Studies 42 (2003): 149–74.Google Scholar
Corns, Thomas N. “Imagery in Civil War Polemic: Milton, Overton and the Eikon Basilike.” Milton Quarterly 14 (1980): 1–6.Google Scholar
Corns, Thomas N. “Milton and the Limitations of Englishness.” In Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England, ed. Loewenstein, David and Stevens, Paul, 205–16. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Corthell, Ronald, and Corns, Thomas N., eds. Milton and Catholicism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Crawford, Patricia. “‘The Poorest She’: Women and Citizenship in Early Modern England.” In The Putney Debates of 1647: The Army, the Levellers, and the English State, ed. Mendle, Michael, 197–219. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Crosbie, Christopher. “Publicizing the Science of God: Milton’s Raphael and the Boundaries of Knowledge.” Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature 67, no. 4 (2015): 239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCook, Travis. “Unearthing Radical Reform: Antiquarianism against Discovery.” In The Invention of Discovery, 1500–1700, ed. Fleming, James Dougal, 139–52. Literary and Scientific Cultures of Early Modernity. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
DeGruy, Karma. “Desiring Angels: The Angelic Body in Paradise Lost.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 54, no. 1 (2012): 117–49.Google Scholar
Distiller, Natasha. Desire and Gender in the Sonnet Tradition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
Dodds, Lara. “‘To Due Conversation Accessible’: Or, the Problem of Courtship in Milton’s Divorce Tracts and Paradise Lost.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 56, no. 1 (2014): 42–65.Google Scholar
Dolven, Jeff. Scenes of Instruction in Renaissance Romance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Donawerth, Jane. Conversational Rhetoric: The Rise and Fall of a Women’s Tradition, 1600–1900. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Duran, Angelica. “The Blind Bard, According to John Milton and His Contemporaries.” Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal 46, no. 3 (2013): 141–57.Google Scholar
Duran, Angelica. “First and Last Fruits of Education: The Companion Poems, Epistola, and Educational Prose Works.” In A Concise Companion to Milton, ed. Duran, Angelica, 61–77. Blackwell Concise Companions to Literature and Culture. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Duran, Angelica. “Reformed Catechism and Scientific Method in Milton’s Of Education and Paradise Lost.” In Science, Literature, and Rhetoric in Early Modern England, ed. Cummins, Juliet and Burchell, David, 74–94. Literary and Scientific Cultures of Early Modernity (LSCEM). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lee. “Unnamed: Eve’s Epistemology.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 52, no. 2 (2010): 185–90.Google Scholar
Edwards, Karen L. “Resisting Representation: All About Milton’s ‘Eve.’” Exemplaria: A Journal of Theory in Medieval and Renaissance Studies 9, no. 1 (1997): 231–53.Google Scholar
Egan, James. “Implicit Aesthetics: Rhetorical Formulae and Poetic Shaping in Milton’s Tracts on Divorce and Education.” Prose Studies: History, Theory, Criticism 29, no. 2 (2007): 178–203.Google Scholar
Escobedo, Andrew. “The Invisible Nation: Church, State, and Schism in Milton’s England.” In Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England, ed. Loewenstein, David and Stevens, Paul, 173–204. Buffalo; Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Ezell, Margaret. The Patriarch’s Wife: Literary Evidence and the History of the Family. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Fallon, Robert Thomas. Captain or Colonel: The Soldier in Milton’s Life and Art. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Fallon, Robert Thomas. “Milton’s ‘Defenseless Doors’: The Limits of Irony.” Milton Quarterly 13 (1979): 146–5.Google Scholar
Fallon, Stephen M. “The Metaphysics of Milton’s Divorce Tracts.” In Politics, Poetics, and Hermeneutics in Milton’s Prose, ed. Loewenstein, David and Turner, James Grantham, 69–83. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Fallon, Stephen M. Milton’s Peculiar Grace: Self-Representation and Authority. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Fallon, Stephen M. “The Spur of Self-Concernment: Milton in His Divorce Tracts.” Milton Studies 38 (2000): 220–42.Google Scholar
Feather, Jennifer, Thomas, Catherine E., and Kahn, Coppélia, eds. Violent Masculinities: Male Aggression in Early Modern Texts and Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Festa, Thomas. “Eve and the Ironic Theodicy of the New Milton Criticism.” In The New Milton Criticism, ed. Herman, Peter C., Sauer, Elizabeth, and Wittreich, Joseph A., 175–93. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Fickling, Teri. “‘Lodged with Me Useless’: Blindness in John Milton’s Sonnet 19 and Infertility in Monica Youn’s Blackacre.” Milton Studies 61, no. 2 (2019): 141–62.Google Scholar
Finney, Gretchen Ludke. “Chorus in Samson Agonistes.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 58, no. 3 (1943): 649–64.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. “Spectacle and Evidence in Samson Agonistes.” Critical Inquiry 15, no. 3 (1989): 556–86.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. “‘There Is Nothing He Cannot Ask’: Milton, Liberalism, and Terrorism.” In Milton in the Age of Fish: Essays on Authorship, Text, and Terrorism, ed. Lieb, Michael, Labriola, Albert C., and Cable, Lana, 243–64. Medieval and Renaissance Literary Studies. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Flannagan, Roy. “Belial and ‘Effeminate Slackness’ in Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained.” Milton Quarterly 19, no. 1 (1985): 9–11.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Anthony. “Manhood, the Male Body, Courtship and the Household in Early Modern England.” History 84, no. 275 (1999): 419–36.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Christopher. “The Whig Interpretation of Masculinity? Honour and Sexuality in Late Medieval Manhood.” In What is Masculinity: Historical Dynamics from Antiquity to the Contemporary World, ed. John, H. Arnold and Brady, Sean, 245–62. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Foyster, Elizabeth A. Manhood in Early Modern England: Honour, Sex and Marriage. New York: Longman, 1999.Google Scholar
Francisco, Timothy. “Marlowe’s War Horses: Cyborgs, Soldiers and Queer Companions.” In Violent Masculinities: Male Aggression in Early Modern Texts and Culture, ed. Feather, Jennifer, Thomas, Catherine E., and Kahn, Coppélia, 47–65. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Freeman, James A. Milton and the Martial Muse: Paradise Lost and European Traditions of War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Fumerton, Patricia. “‘Secret’ Arts: Elizabethan Miniatures and Sonnets.” Representations 15 (1986): 57–97.Google Scholar
Gamarnikow, Eva, Morgan, David, Purvis, June, and Taylorson, Daphne, eds. The Public and the Private. London: Heinemann, 1983.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Judith Kegan. “Female Masculinity and Phallic Women: Unruly Concepts.” Feminist Studies 38, no. 3 (2012): 597–624.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Judith Kegan, ed. Masculinity Studies and Feminist Theory: New Directions. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Garrison, John S. Friendship and Queer Theory in the Renaissance: Gender and Sexuality in Early Modern England. Routledge Studies in Renaissance Literature and Culture 24. New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Garrison, John S. “Plurality and Amicitia in Milton’s Epitaphium Damonis.” Milton Quarterly 46, no. 3 (2012): 154–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaylard, Susan. “Castiglione vs. Cicero: Political Engagement, or Effeminate Chatter?” Italian Culture 27, no. 2 (2009): 81–98.Google Scholar
Gleason, Maud W. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Lynne A. “Dalila’s ‘Feminine Assaults’: The Gendering and Engendering of Crime in Samson Agonistes.” In Altering Eyes: New Perspectives on Samson Agonistes, ed. Kelley, Mark R. and Wittreich, Joseph, 192–219. Newark; London: University of Delaware Press; Associated University Presses, 2002.Google Scholar
Green-Moore, Melissa. “The Psychology of ‘Samson Agonistes’ and God’s Role in Terrorism.” CEAMAG Journal 26 (2017): 45–55.Google Scholar
Greenstadt, Amy. Rape and the Rise of the Author: Gendering Intention in Early Modern England. Women and Gender in the Early Modern World. Surrey: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Gregory, Tobias. “The Political Messages of Samson Agonistes.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 50, no. 1 (2010): 175–203.Google Scholar
Grendler, Paul F. “Education in the Renaissance and Reformation.” Renaissance Quarterly 43, no. 4 (1990): 774–824.Google Scholar
Greteman, Blaine. “‘Perplex’t Paths’: Youth and Authority in Milton’s Mask.” Renaissance Quarterly 62, no. 2 (2009): 410–43.Google Scholar
Griffin, Danielle. “Shaping the Conversation: Madeleine de Scudéry’s Use of Genre in Her Rhetorical Dialogues.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 37 no. 4 (2019): 402–21.Google Scholar
Grossman, Marshall. “The Rhetoric of Feminine Priority and the Ethics of Form in Paradise Lost.” English Literary Renaissance 33, no. 3 (2003): 424–43.Google Scholar
Guibbory, Achsah. Christian Identity: Jews and Israel in Seventeenth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Guibbory, Achsah, “Israel and the English Protestant Nationalism: ‘Fast Sermons’ during the English Revolution.” In Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England, ed. Loewenstein, David and Stevens, Paul, 115–38. Buffalo; Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. “Dalila's House: Samson Agonistes and the Sexual Division of Labor.” In Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourse of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe, ed. Ferguson, Margaret W., Quilligan, Maureen, Vickers, Nancy J., and Stimpson, Catharine R., 106–22. Women in Culture & Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. “The Father's House: Samson Agonistes in Its Historical Moment.” In Re-Membering Milton: Essays on the Texts and Traditions, ed. Nyquist, Mary and Ferguson, Margaret W., 148–76. New York: Methuen Publishing, 1987.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. Poetic Authority: Spenser, Milton, and Literary History. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Guy-Bray, Stephen. Against Reproduction: Where Renaissance Texts Come From. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Guy-Bray, Stephen. “Shakespeare and the Invention of the Heterosexual.” Early Modern Literary Studies: A Journal of Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century English Literature E-journal 16 (2007).Google Scholar
Haas, Renate. “Femina: Female Roots of ‘Foreign’ Language Teaching and the Rise of Mother-Tongue Ideologies.” Exemplaria: A Journal of Theory in Medieval and Renaissance Studies 19, no. 1 (2007): 139–62.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hackenbracht, Ryan. “Milton and the Parable of the Talents: Nationalism and the Prelacy Controversy in Revolutionary England.” Philological Quarterly 94, nos. 1–2 (2015): 71–93.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Andrew. “Milton and the Struggle for the Representation of the Nation: Reading Paradise Lost through Eikonoklastes.” In Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England, ed. Loewenstein, David and Stevens, Paul, 51–72. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hall, Kim F. Things of Darkness: Economies of Race and Gender in Early Modern England. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hausknecht, Gina. “The Gender of Civic Virtue.” In Milton and Gender, ed. Martin, Catherine Gimelli, 19–33. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hawkes, David. John Milton: A Hero of Our Time. Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hawkes, David. “The Politics of Character in John Milton’s Divorce Tracts.” Journal of the History of Ideas 62, no. 1 (2001): 141–60.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Zoe. “Spenser, Circe, and the Civil War: The Contexts of Milton’s ‘Captain or Colonel.’” The Review of English Studies 66, no. 277 (2015): 876–94.Google Scholar
Heitsch, Dorothea, and Vallée, Jean-François. Printed Voices: The Renaissance Culture of Dialogue. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. Adulterous Alliances: Home, State, and History in Early Modern European Drama and Painting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Hendrix, Scott H., and Karant-Nunn, Susan C.. Masculinity in the Reformation Era. Kirksville, MO: Truman State University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heng, Geraldine. “Reinventing Race, Colonization, and Globalisms across Deep Time: Lessons from the Longue Durée.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 130, no. 2 (2015): 358–66.Google Scholar
Hengstmengel, Joost. Divine Providence in Early Modern Economic Thought. New York; Florence: Routledge, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Peter C. Destabilizing Milton: “Paradise Lost” and the Poetics of Incertitude. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Herman, Peter C., and Sauer, Elizabeth, eds. The New Milton Criticism. New York; Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hillier, Russell M. “Milton’s ‘Genial Angel’: The Identity and Salvific Office of the Son in Adam’s Narrative of Creation and Recreation.” Studies in Philology 107, no. 3 (2010): 366–400.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Elizabeth. “Failed Alliances and Miserable Marriages in Katherine Philips’ Letters.” In The Politics of Female Alliance in Early Modern English Literature, ed. O’Leary, Niamh J. and Luckyj, Christina, 86–106. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Elizabeth. “Milton Takes the Veil.” In Milton and the Uses of History: Essays by Canadians Past and Present, ed. Mohamed, Feisal G., Nyquist, Mary, and Stevens, Paul, 311–26. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Elizabeth. “When God Proposes: Theology and Gender in Tetrachordon.” Milton Studies 31 (1995): 133–54.Google Scholar
Hoxby, Blair. “Areopagitica and Liberty.” In The Oxford Handbook of Milton, ed. McDowell, Nicholas and Smith, Nigel, 218–38. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Huntley, John. “A Revaluation of the Chorus’ Role in Milton’s Samson Agonistes.” Modern Philology 64, no. 2 (1966): 132–45.Google Scholar
Hutson, Lorna. “Civility and Virility in Ben Jonson.” Representations 78 (2002): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutson, Lorna. The Usurer’s Daughter: Male Friendship and Fictions of Women in Sixteenth-Century England. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Jackson, Christine. “Memory and the Construction and Experience of Elite Masculinity in the Seventeenth-Century Autobiography of Lord Herbert of Cherbury.” Gender & History 25, no. 1 (2013): 107–31.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Nicole A. “Robbing His Captive Shepherdess: Princess Elizabeth, John Milton, and the Memory of Charles I in the Eikon Basilike and Eikonoklastes.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 54, no. 2 (2012): 227–55.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kimberly. “Raphael’s ‘Potent Tongue’: Power and Spectacle in Paradise Lost.” Milton Quarterly 46, no. 4 (2012): 205–18.Google Scholar
Jordan, Constance. “The Household and the State: Transformations in the Representation of an Analogy from Aristotle to James I.” Modern Language Quarterly: A Journal of Literary History 54, no. 3 (1993): 308–26.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jennifer. “‘To Make a Man without Reason’: Examining Manhood and Manliness in Early Modern England.” In What Is Masculinity? Historical Dynamics from Antiquity to the Contemporary World, ed. Arnold, John H. and Brady, Sean, 245–62. New York; Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. “Disappointed Nationalism: Milton in the Context of Seventeenth-Century Debates about the Nation-State.” In Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England, ed. Loewenstein, David and Stevens, Paul, 249–72. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. “‘The Duty to Love’: Passion and Obligation in Early Modern Political Theory.” Representations 68 (1999): 84–107.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. “Job’s Complaint in Paradise Regained.” ELH: English Literary History 76, no. 3 (2009): 625–60.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. Wayward Contracts: The Crisis of Political Obligation in England, 1640–1674. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Kau, Andrew. “The Eve Function in Paradise Regained.” Huntington Library Quarterly: Studies in English and American History and Literature 76, no. 1 (2013): 161–79.Google Scholar
Kellett, Katherine R. “The Lady’s Voice: Poetic Collaboration in Milton’s Mask.” Milton Studies 50 (2009): 1–19.Google Scholar
Kendrick, Christopher. “Milton and Sexuality: A Symptomatic Reading of Comus.” In Re-Membering Milton: Essays on the Texts and Traditions, ed. Nyquist, Mary and Ferguson, Margaret W., 43–73. University Paperbacks 975. New York: Methuen Publishing, 1987.Google Scholar
Kerr, Jason. “De Doctrina Christiana and Milton’s Theology of Liberation.” Studies in Philology 111, no. 2 (2014): 346–74.Google Scholar
Kerrigan, William. “The Politically Correct Comus: A Reply to John Leonard.” Milton Quarterly 27, no. 4 (1993): 147–53.Google Scholar
Kilgour, Maggie. “Odd Couplings: Hercules and Oedipus in Paradise Regained and Samson Agonistes.” Milton Studies 56 (2015): 75–113.Google Scholar
Kilgour, Maggie. “Writing on Water.” English Literary Renaissance 29, no. 2 (1999): 282–305.Google Scholar
Kim, Julie H. “The Lady’s Unladylike Struggle: Redefining Patriarchal Boundaries in Milton’s Comus.” Milton Studies 35 (1997): 1–20.Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael. “The ‘Crisis’ of Masculinity in Seventeenth-Century England.” In Constructions of Masculinity in British Literature from the Middle Ages to the Present, ed. Horlacher, Stefan, 89–108. Global Masculinities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Kinney, Arthur F. “The Art of Conversazioni: Practices in Renaissance Rhetoric.” In Textual Conversations in the Renaissance: Ethics, Authors, Technologies, ed. Lesser, Zachary and Robinson, Benedict S., 13–26. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar
Knoppers, Laura Lunger. “Consuming Nations: Milton and Luxury.” In Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England, ed. Loewenstein, David and Stevens, Paul, 331–55. Buffalo; Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Knoppers, Laura Lunger. “Paradise Regained and the Politics of Martyrdom.” Modern Philology 90, no. 2 (1992): 200–19.Google Scholar
Knoppers, Laura Lunger. Politicizing Domesticity from Henrietta Maria to Milton’s Eve. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Komorowski, Michael. “Milton’s Natural Law: Divorce and Individual Property.” Milton Studies 53 (2012): 69–99.Google Scholar
Kranidas, Thomas. “Milton Rewrites the Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 53, no. 1 (2013): 117–35.Google Scholar
Krook, Anne K. “The Hermeneutics of Opposition in Paradise Regained and Samson Agonistes.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 36, no. 1 (1996): 129–47.Google Scholar
Kuzner, James. “Habermas Goes to Hell: Pleasure, Public Reason, and the Republicanism of Paradise Lost.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 51, no. 1 (2009): 105–45.Google Scholar
Labreche, Ben. “Espousing Liberty: The Gender of Liberalism and the Politics of Miltonic Divorce.” ELH: English Literary History 77, no. 4 (2010): 969–94.Google Scholar
Landes, Joan B. Feminism, the Public and the Private. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Landreth, David. “Once More into the Preech: The Merry Wives’ English Pedagogy.” Shakespeare Quarterly 55, no. 4 (2004): 420–49.Google Scholar
Larson, Katherine R. “From Inward Conversation to Public Praise: Mary Sidney Herbert’s Psalmes.” Sidney Journal 24, no. 1 (2006): 21–43.Google Scholar
Lavezzo, Kathy. The Accommodated Jew: English Antisemitism from Bede to Milton. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Leach, Robert. “As You Like It: A ‘Robin Hood’ Play.” English Studies: A Journal of English Language and Literature 82, no. 5 (2001): 393–400.Google Scholar
Leasure, Ross. “Milton’s Queer Choice: Comus as Castlehaven.” Milton Quarterly 36, no. 2 (2002): 63–86.Google Scholar
Lehnhof, Kent R. “Performing Masculinity in Paradise Lost.” Milton Studies 50 (2009): 64–77.Google Scholar
Leonard, John. “Saying ‘No’ to Freud: Milton’s A Mask and Sexual Assault.” Milton Quarterly 25, no. 4 (1991): 129–40.Google Scholar
Leonard, John. “The Troubled, Quiet Endings of Milton’s English Sonnets.” In The Oxford Handbook of Milton, ed. McDowell, Nicholas and Smith, Nigel, 136–54. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary, and Robinson, Benedict R., “Introduction.” In Textual Conversations in the Renaissance: Ethics, Authors, Technologies, ed. Lesser, Zachary and Robinson, Benedict S.. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara K. “Contemporary History as Literary Subject: Milton’s Sonnets.” Milton Quarterly 47, no. 4 (2013): 220–9.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara K. The Life of John Milton: A Critical Biography. Blackwell Critical Biographies. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara K. Milton’s Brief Epic: The Genre, Meaning, and Art of Paradise Regained. Providence, RI: Brown University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara K. “Milton’s Comus and the Politics of Masquing.” In The Politics of the Stuart Court Masque, ed. Bevington, David, Holbrook, Peter, and Marcus, Leah S., 296–320. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lieb, Michael. “Milton among the Monks.” In Milton and the Middle Ages, ed. Mulryan, John, 103–14. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Lieb, Michael. Milton and the Culture of Violence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Lin, Erika T. “Popular Festivity and the Early Modern Stage: The Case of George à Greene.” Theatre Journal 61, no. 2 (2009): 271–97.Google Scholar
Lobo, Giuseppina Iacono. “John Milton, Oliver Cromwell, and the Cause of Conscience.” Studies in Philology 112, no. 4 (2015): 774–97.Google Scholar
Lochman, Daniel T., Maritere López, , and Hutson, Lorna, eds. Discourses and Representations of Friendship in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1700. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
Loeffelholz, Mary. “Two Masques of Ceres and Proserpine: Comus and The Tempest.” In Re-Membering Milton: Essays on the Texts and Traditions, ed. Nyquist, Mary and Ferguson, Margaret W., 25–42. University Paperbacks 975. New York: Methuen Publishing, 1987.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, David. “The Kingdom Within: Radical Religious Culture and the Politics of Paradise Regained.” Literature and History 3, no. 2 (1994): 63–89.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, David. “Samson Agonistes and the Culture of Religious Terror.” In Milton in the Age of Fish: Essays on Authorship, Text, and Terrorism, ed. Lieb, Michael, Labriola, Albert C., and Cable, Lana, 203–28. Medieval and Renaissance Literary Studies. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, David, and Stevens, Paul, eds. Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England. Buffalo; Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, Joseph, and Stevens, Paul. “Introduction: Charting Habermas’s ‘Literary’ or ‘Precursor’ Public Sphere.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 46, no. 2 (2004): 201–77.Google Scholar
Low, Anthony. “Milton, Paradise Regained, and Georgic.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 98, no. 2 (1983): 152–69.Google Scholar
Luckyj, Christina. “A Mouzell for Melastomus in Context: Rereading the Swetnam–Speght Debate.” English Literary Renaissance 40, no. 1 (2010): 113–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luxon, Thomas H. “‘How Human Life Began’: Sexual Reproduction in Book 8 of Paradise Lost.” In Sex before Sex: Figuring the Act in Early Modern England, ed. Bromley, James M., Stockton, Will, and Traub, Valerie, 263–90. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Luxon, Thomas H. Single Imperfection: Milton, Marriage and Friendship. Medieval and Renaissance Literary Studies. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Macdonald, James Ross. “Milton’s Tutelary Angels.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 60, no. 1 (2020): 113–32.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Raymond N. “Rethinking Rhyme, Signifying Friendship: Milton’s Lycidas and Epitaphium Damonis.” Modern Philology 106, no. 3 (2009): 530–54.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Lynne. Shakespeare and Social Dialogue: Dramatic Language and Elizabethan Letters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Magro, Maria. “Milton’s Sexualized Woman and the Creation of a Gendered Public Sphere.” Milton Quarterly 35, no. 2 (2001): 98–112.Google Scholar
Maley, Willy. “That Fatal Boadicea: Depicting Women in Milton’s History of Britain, 1670.” In Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England, ed. Loewenstein, David and Stevens, Paul, 305–30. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah S. “John Milton’s Comus.” In A Companion to Milton, ed. Corns, Thomas N., 232–45. Blackwell Companions to Literature and Culture 10. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah S. “The Milieu of Milton’s Comus: Judicial Reform at Ludlow and the Problem of Sexual Assault.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 25, no. 4 (1983): 293–327.Google Scholar
Marquez, Reuben. “‘The Worst of Superstitions’: Milton’s Of True Religion and the Issue of Religious Tolerance.” Prose Studies 9, no. 3 (1986): 21–38.Google Scholar
Martin, Catherine Gimelli. “Dalila, Misogyny, and Milton’s Christian Liberty of Divorce.” In Milton and Gender, ed. Martin, Catherine Gimelli, 53–74. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Martin, Catherine Gimelli. Milton among the Puritans: The Case for Historical Revisionism. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar
Martin, Catherine Gimelli, ed. Milton and Gender. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Marx, Steven. “The Prophet Disarmed: Milton and the Quakers.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 32, no. 1 (1992): 111–28.Google Scholar
Masten, Jeffrey. “Playwrighting: Authorship and Collaboration.” In A New History of Early English Drama, ed. Cox, John D., Kastan, David Scott, and Greenblatt, Stephen J., 357–82. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Masten, Jeffrey. “‘Shall I Turne Blabb?’: Circulation, Gender, and Subjectivity in Mary Wroth’s Sonnets.” In Reading Mary Wroth: Representing Alternatives in Early Modern England, ed. Miller, Naomi J. and Waller, Gary, 67–87. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Masten, Jeffrey. “Toward a Queer Address: The Taste of Letters and Early Modern Male Friendship.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 10, no. 3 (2004): 367–84.Google Scholar
Masten, Jeffrey. “The Two Gentlemen of Verona.” In A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume III: The Comedies, ed. Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E., 266–88. Blackwell Companions to Literature and Culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006.Google Scholar
McEachern, Claire. The Poetics of English Nationhood, 1590–1612. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
McLeod, Bruce. The Geography of Empire in English Literature, 1580–1745. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Mendle, Michael, ed. The Putney Debates of 1647: The Army, the Levellers, and the English State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Mendyk, Stanley G. Speculum Britanniae: Regional Study, Antiquarianism, and Science in Britain to 1700. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Miller, Nancy Weitz. “Chastity, Rape, and Ideology in the Castlehaven Testimonies and Milton’s Ludlow Mask.” Milton Studies 32 (1995): 153–68.Google Scholar
Miller, Shannon. Engendering the Fall: John Milton and Seventeenth-Century Women Writers. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Miller, Shannon. “Serpentine Eve: Milton and the Seventeenth-Century Debate over Women.” Milton Quarterly 42, no. 1 (2008): 44–68.Google Scholar
Milligan, Gerry. “The Politics of Effeminacy in Il Cortegiano.” Italica 83, nos. 3–4 (2006): 345–66.Google Scholar
Mohamed, Feisal G. “Confronting Religious Violence: Milton’s Samson Agonistes.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 120, no. 2 (2005): 327–40.Google Scholar
Mohamed, Feisal G. In the Anteroom of Divinity: The Reformation of the Angels from Colet to Milton. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Mohamed, Feisal G., Nyquist, Mary, and Stevens, Paul, eds. Milton and Questions of History: Essays by Canadians Past and Present. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Moore, Mary B. Desiring Voices: Women Sonneteers and Petrarchism. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Morrill, John, and Baker, Philip. “The Case of the Armie Truly Re-stated.” In The Putney Debates of 1647: The Army, the Levellers, and the English State, ed. Mendle, Michael, 103–24. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Morris, Ann Pleiss. “The Queen’s Masques: Rethinking Jacobean Masques and an English Feminine Theater.” Philological Quarterly 97, no. 4 (2018): 467–80.Google Scholar
Morrissey, Lee. ““A Secular Bird Ages”: Samson Agonistes as a Tragic Reaction against Modernity.” In Milton’s Modernities: Poetry, Philosophy, and History from the Seventeenth Century to the Present, ed. Mohamed, Feisal G., Fadely, Patrick, and Achinstein, Sharon, 259–78. Rethinking the Early Modern. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Morvan, Alain. “Education Féminine et Prévention des Déviances en Angleterre de 1650 à 1740.” In Conformité et Déviances: Actes du Séminaire, ed. Morvan, Alain, 10–31. Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires de Lille, 1984.Google Scholar
Mueller, Janel M. “On Genesis in Genre: Milton’s Politicizing of the Sonnet in ‘Captain or Colonel.’” In Renaissance Genres: Essays on Theory, History, and Interpretation, ed. Lewalski, Barbara Kiefer, 213–40. Harvard English Studies 14. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Murphy, Erin. “Sabrina and the Making of English History in Poly-Olbion and a Maske Presented at Ludlow Castle.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 51, no. 1 (2011): 87–110.Google Scholar
Murphy, Erin and Vincent, Keith, eds. “Honoring Eve: A Special Issue on the Work of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 52, no. 2 (2010): 159–76.Google Scholar
Mustazza, Leonard. “Language as Weapon in Milton’s Paradise Regained.” Milton Studies 18 (1983): 195–216.Google Scholar
Nardo, Anna K. Milton’s Sonnets: The Ideal Community. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Neelakanta, Vanita. “Paradise Regained in the Closet: Private Piety in the Brief Epic.” In To Repair the Ruins: Reading Milton, ed. Fenton, Mary C. and Schwartz, Louis, 147–72. Medieval and Renaissance Literary Studies. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Nichols, Jennifer L. “Milton’s Claim for Self and Freedom in the Divorce Tracts.” Milton Studies 49 (2009): 192–211.Google Scholar
Norbrook, David. “Areopagitica, Censorship, and the Early Modern Public Sphere.” In British Literature 1640–1789: A Critical Reader, ed. DeMaria, Robert, Jr., 13–39. Blackwell Critical Readers. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1999.Google Scholar
Norbrook, David. Poetry and Politics in the English Renaissance. London: Routledge, 1984.Google Scholar
Norbrook, David. “Republican Occasions in Paradise Regained and Samson Agonistes.” Milton Studies 42 (2003): 122–48.Google Scholar
Nyquist, Mary. “The Genesis of Gendered Subjectivity in the Divorce Tracts and in Paradise Lost.” In Re-Membering Milton: Essays on the Texts and Traditions, ed. Nyquist, Mary and Ferguson, Margaret W., 99–127. University Paperbacks 975. New York: Methuen Publishing, 1987.Google Scholar
Nyquist, Mary. “Textual Overlapping and Dalilah’s Harlot-Lap.” In Literary Theory/Renaissance Texts, ed. Parker, Patricia and Quint, David, 341–72. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Oh, Unjoo. “Raphael on Trial: Digestive Ontology and Milton’s Absolution of God.” Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 51 (2020): 213–36.Google Scholar
Oldman, Elizabeth. “Milton, Grotius, and the Law of War: A Reading of Paradise Regained and Samson Agonistes.” Studies in Philology 104, no. 3 (2007): 340–75.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia. “Virile Style.” Premodern Sexualities, ed. Fradenburg, Louise, Freccero, Carla, and Lavezzo, Kathy, 201–22. New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Parry, David. “As an Angel of Light: Satanic Rhetoric in Early Modern Literature and Theology.” In The Hermeneutics of Hell: Visions and Representations of the Devil in World Literature, ed. Thuswaldner, Gregor and Russ, Daniel, 47–71. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan (London), 2017.Google Scholar
Parry, Graham. The Trophies of Time: English Antiquarians of the Seventeenth Century. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel. “‘Forc’d Fingers’: Milton’s Early Poems and Ideological Constraint.” In“The Muses Common-Weale”: Poetry and Politics in the Seventeenth Century, ed. Summers, Claude J. and Pebworth, Ted-Larry, 9–22. Columbia: Missouri University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel. “Milton, Marriage, and Divorce.” In A Companion to Milton, ed. Corns, Thomas N., 279–93. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel. “Milton’s Heroic Sonnets.” In A Concise Companion to Milton, ed. Duran, Angelica, 78–94. Blackwell Concise Companions to Literature and Culture. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel. “‘No Meer Amatorious Novel?’” In Politics, Poetics, and Hermeneutics in Milton’s Prose, ed. Loewenstein, David and Turner, James Grantham, 85–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Patterson, William Brown. Thomas Fuller: Discovering England’s Religious Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Patton, Elizabeth. “Second Thoughts of a Renaissance Humanist on the Education of Women: Juan Luis Vives Revises His De Institutione Feminae Christianae.” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews 5, nos. 2–3 (1992): 111–14.Google Scholar
Peters, Belinda. Marriage in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Prawdzik, Brendan. “‘Look on Me’: Theater, Gender, and Poetic Identity Formation in Milton’s Maske.” Studies in Philology 110, no. 4 (2013): 812–50.Google Scholar
Purkiss, Diane. Literature, Gender and Politics during the English Civil War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Purkiss, Diane.”What Do Men Want? Satan, the Rake, and Masculine Desire.” In Milton Now: Alternative Approaches and Contexts, ed. Gray, Catharine and Murphy, Erin, 175–94. Early Modern Cultural Studies 1500–1700. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Purkiss, Diane. “Whose Liberty? The Rhetoric of Milton’s Divorce Tracts.” In The Oxford Handbook of Milton, ed. McDowell, Nicholas and Smith, Nigel, 186–99. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Quint, David. “David’s Census: Milton’s Politics and Paradise Regained.” In Re-Membering Milton: Essays on the Texts and Traditions, ed. Nyquist, Mary and Ferguson, Margaret W., 128–47. New York: Methuen Publishing, 1988.Google Scholar
Quint, David. “The Disenchanted World of Paradise Regained.” Huntington Library Quarterly 76, no. 1 (2013): 181–94.Google Scholar
Radzinowicz, Mary Ann. “Paradise Regained as Hermeneutic Combat.” Studies in Literature 15–16, no. 3–1 (1983–4): 99–107.Google Scholar
Radzinowicz, Mary Ann. Toward Samson Agonistes: The Growth of Milton’s Mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Rajan, Balachandra. “Warfaring and Wayfaring: Milton and the Globalization of Tolerance.” In Milton and the Climates of Reading: Essays by Balachandra Rajan, ed. Sauer, Elizabeth. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Rambuss, Richard. “After Male Sex.” South Atlantic Quarterly 106, no. 3 (2007): 577–88.Google Scholar
Rambuss, Richard. “Milton’s Adam.” In Approaches to Teaching Milton’s Paradise Lost, ed. Herman, Peter C., 95–100. Approaches to Teaching World Literature 122. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2012.Google Scholar
Randall, David. The Concept of Conversation: From Cicero’s Sermo to the Grand Siècle’s Conversation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Raymond, Joad. “Look Homeward Angel: Guardian Angels and Nationhood in Seventeenth-Century England.” In Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England, ed. Loewenstein, David and Stevens, Paul, 139–72. Buffalo; Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Reider, Alexander. “‘Bless Us! What a Word on a Title Page Is This!’: Linguistic Purism and Milton’s English Verse.” Milton Studies 57 (2016): 211–31.Google Scholar
Reinke‐Williams, Tim. “Manhood and Masculinity in Early Modern England.” History Compass 12, no. 9 (2014): 685–93.Google Scholar
Revard, Stella Purce. Milton and the Tangles of Neaera’s Hair: The Making of the 1645 Poems. Columbia: Missouri University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Revard, Stella Purce. The War in Heaven: Paradise Lost and the Tradition of Satan’s Rebellion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Richards, Jennifer. “Assumed Simplicity and the Critique of Nobility; or, How Castiglione Read Cicero.” Renaissance Quarterly 54, no. 2 (2001): 460–86.Google Scholar
Richards, Jennifer. Rhetoric and Courtliness in Early Modern Literature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Rose, Mary Beth. “‘Vigorous Most/When Most Unactive Deem’d’: Gender and the Heroics of Endurance in Milton’s Samson Agonistes, Aphra Behn’s Oroonoko, and Mary Astell’s Some Reflections Upon Marriage.” Milton Studies 33 (1997): 83–100.Google Scholar
Sadler, Lynn V. “Coping with Hebraic Legalism: The Chorus in ‘Samson Agonistes,’” Harvard Theological Review 66, no. 3 (1973): 353–68.Google Scholar
Samuels, Peggy. “Labor in the Chambers: Paradise Regained and the Discourse of Quiet.” Milton Studies 36 (1998): 153–76.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Melissa E. “Milton’s Genderqueer Christianity.” Milton Studies 62, no. 2 (2020): 306–22.Google Scholar
Sanders, Julie. “Ecocritical Readings and the Seventeenth-Century Woodland: Milton’s Comus and the Forest of Dean.” English: The Journal of the English Association 50, no. 196 (2001): 1–18.Google Scholar
Sauer, Elizabeth M. “Milton’s Peculiar Nation.” In Milton and the Jews, ed. Brooks, Douglas A., 35–56. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Sauer, Elizabeth. Milton, Toleration, and Nationhood. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Schmitt, David R. “Heroic Deeds of Conscience: Milton’s Stand against Religious Conformity in Paradise Regained.” Huntington Library Quarterly 76, no. 1 (2013): 105–35.Google Scholar
Schuler, Stephen J. “Sanctification in Milton’s Academy: Reassessing the Purposes in of Education and the Pedagogy of Paradise Lost.” Milton Quarterly 43, no. 1 (2009): 39–56.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Kathryn. “Chastity, Militant and Married: Cavendish’s Romance, Milton’s Masque.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 118, no. 2 (2003): 270–85.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. Gender and Culture. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Shanley, Mary Lyndon. “Marriage Contract and Social Contract in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought.” Western Political Quarterly 32, no. 1 (1979): 79–91.Google Scholar
Shannon, Laurie. “Nature’s Bias: Renaissance Homonormativity and Elizabethan Comic Likeness.” Modern Philology 98, no. 2 (2000): 183–210.Google Scholar
Shawcross, John T. John Milton: The Self and the World. Studies in the English Renaissance. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1993.Google Scholar
Sheen, Erica. Shakespeare and the Institution of Theatre: “The Best in This Kind.” Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Shepard, Alexandra. “Manhood, Credit and Patriarchy in Early Modern England c.1580–1640.” Past & Present 167 (2000): 75–106.Google Scholar
Shepard, Alexandra. Meanings of Manhood in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Sherry, Beverley. “Not By Bread Alone: The Communication of Adam and Raphael.” Milton Quarterly 13 (1979), 111–14.Google Scholar
Shields, David S., and Teute, Fredrika J.. “The Republican Court and the Historiography of a Women’s Domain in the Public Sphere.” Journal of the Early Republic 35, no. 2 (2015): 169–83.Google Scholar
Shullenberger, William. “Girl, Interrupted: Spenserian Bondage and Release in Milton’s Ludlow Mask.” Milton Quarterly 37, no. 4 (2003): 184–204.Google Scholar
Shullenberger, William. 𠇜The Profession of Virginity in a Maske Presented at Ludlow Castle.” In Milton and Gender, edited by Martin, Catherine Gimelli, 77–94. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Skura, Meredith. “Anthony Munday’s ‘Gentrification’ of Robin Hood.” English Literary Renaissance 33, no. 2 (2003): 155–80.Google Scholar
Smith, Hilda L. “‘All Men and Both Sexes’: Concepts of Men’s Development, Women’s Education, and Feminism in the Seventeenth Century.” In Man, God, and Nature in the Enlightenment, ed. Mell, Donald C., Jr., Braun, Theodore E. D., and Palmer, Lucia M., 75–84. Studies in Literature, 1500–1800 2. East Lansing, MI: Colleagues Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Smith, Rosalind. Sonnets and the English Woman Writer, 1560–1621: The Politics of Absence. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Song, Eric B. “‘Unspeakable Desire to See, and Know’: Paradise Regained and the Political Theology of Privacy.” Huntington Library Quarterly: Studies in English and American History and Literature 76, no. 1 (2013): 137–60.Google Scholar
Stephens, Dorothy. The Limits of Eroticism in Post-Petrarchan Narrative: Conditional Pleasure from Spenser to Marvell. Cambridge Studies in Renaissance Literature and Culture 29. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Stevens, Paul. “Milton’s Janus-Faced Nationalism: Soliloquy, Subject, and the Modern Nation State.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 100, no. 2 (2001): 247–68.Google Scholar
Stevens, Paul. “Raphael’s Condescension: Paradise Lost, Jane Austen, and the Secular Displacement of Grace.” In Milton in the Long Restoration, ed. Hoxby, Blair and Coiro, Ann Baynes, 531–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Stockton, Will. “The Seduction of Milton’s Lady: Rape, Psychoanalysis, and the Erotics of Consumption in Comus.” In Sex before Sex: Figuring the Act in Early Modern England, ed. Bromley, James M., Stockton, Will, and Traub, Valerie, 233–61. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Stone, James W. “‘Man’s Effeminate S(Lack)Ness’: Androgyny and the Divided Unity of Adam and Eve.” Milton Quarterly 31, no. 2 (1997): 33–42.Google Scholar
Suh, Hong Won. “Belial, Popery, and True Religion: Milton’s Of True Religion and Antipapist Sentiment.” In Living Texts: Interpreting Milton, ed. Pruitt, Kristen A. and Durham, Charles W., 283–302. Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Summers, Claude J. “The (Homo)Sexual Temptation in Milton's Paradise Regained.” In Reclaiming the Sacred: The Bible in Gay and Lesbian Culture, ed. Frontain, Raymond-Jean, 45–69. New York: Haworth Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Mihoko. Subordinate Subjects: Gender, the Political Nation, and Literary Form in England, 1588–1688. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
Swaim, Kathleen M. “The Doubling of the Chorus in Samson Agonistes.” Milton Studies 20 (1984): 225–45.Google Scholar
Teskey, Gordon. “Dead Shepherd: Milton’s Lycidas.” In Milton’s Rival Hermeneutics: “Reason Is but Choosing,” ed. DuRocher, Richard J. and Thickstun, Margaret Olofson, 31–56. Medieval and Renaissance Literary Studies. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Theis, Jeffrey S. Writing the Forest in Early Modern England: A Sylvan Pastoral Nation. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Thickstun, Margaret Olofson. “Raphael and the Challenge of Evangelical Education.” Milton Quarterly 35, no. 4 (2001): 245–57.Google Scholar
Thickstun, Margaret Olofson. “Resisting Patience in Milton’s Sonnet 19.” Milton Quarterly 44, no. 3 (2010): 168–80.Google Scholar
Thomas, Catherine. “Chaste Bodies and Poisonous Desires in Milton’s Mask.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 46, no. 2 (2006): 435–59.Google Scholar
Tole, Jennifer. “Divine Violence and the Messianic Possibilities of Samson Agonistes.” In Milton’s Modernities: Poetry, Philosophy, and History from the Seventeenth Century to the Present, ed. Mohamed, Feisal G., Fadely, Patrick, and Achinstein, Sharon, 111–34. Rethinking the Early Modern. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Tosh, John. Masculinity: Men Defining Men and Gentlemen, 1560–1918. Marlborough: Adam Matthew Publications, 2000.Google Scholar
Traub, Valerie. Thinking Sex with the Early Moderns. Haney Foundation Series. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Tromly, Fred B. “Grief, Authority and the Resistance to Consolation in Shakespeare.” In Speaking Grief in English Literary Culture: Shakespeare to Milton, ed. Swiss, Margo, Kent, David A., and Houlbrooke, Ralph, 20–41. Medieval and Renaissance Literary Studies (MRLS). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Trubowitz, Rachel. “‘The People of Asia and with Them the Jews’: Israel, Asia, and England in Milton’s Writing.” In Milton and the Jews, ed. Brooks, Douglas A., 151–77. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Tumbleson, Ray. “Of True Religion and False Politics: Milton and the Uses of Anti-Catholicism.” Prose Studies 15, no. 3 (1992): 253–70.Google Scholar
Turner, James Grantham. “The Aesthetics of Divorce: ‘Masculinism,’ Idolatry, and Poetic Authority in Tetrachordon and Paradise Lost.” In Milton and Gender, ed. Martin, Catherine Gimelli, 34–52. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Turner, James Grantham. Schooling Sex: Libertine Literature and Erotic Education in Italy, France, and England, 1534–1685. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Turner, James Grantham. Sexuality and Gender in Early Modern Europe: Institutions, Texts, Images. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Underdown, David, Amussen, Susan Dwyer, and Kishlansky, Mark A., eds. Political Culture and Cultural Politics in Early Modern England: Essays Presented to David Underdown. New York; Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Urban, David V. “The Homosexual Temptation of the Son in Milton’s Paradise Regained: A Reply to John T. Shawcross and Claude J. Summers.” Connotations: A Journal for Critical Debate 21, nos. 2–3 (2011): 272–7.Google Scholar
Valbuena, Olga L. Subjects to the King’s Divorce: Equivocation, Infidelity and Resistance in Early Modern England. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, Gauri. “Milton, Imperialism, and Education.” Modern Language Quarterly: A Journal of Literary History 59, no. 3 (1998): 345–61.Google Scholar
Voekel, Swen. “Propitious Guests: Paradise Lost and Epic Hospitality.” Milton Studies 54 (2013): 209–27.Google Scholar
Von Maltzahn, Nicholas. “Milton: Nation and Reception.” In Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England, ed. Loewenstein, David and Stevens, Paul, 401–42. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Walker, Julia M. Milton and the Idea of Woman. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Walker, Julia M. “Only the Phoenix has a Womb: Samson and the Homeless Women of Israel.” In Altering Eyes: New Perspectives on Samson Agonistes, ed. Kelley, Mark R. and Wittreich, Joseph A., 54–71. London; Canbury, NJ: University of Delaware Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Walker, William. Antiformalist, Unrevolutionary, Illiberal Milton: Political Prose, 1644–1660. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, 2014.Google Scholar
Wall, Wendy. “Circulating Texts in Early Modern England.” In Teaching Tudor and Stuart Women Writers, ed. Woods, Susanne and Hannay, Margaret P., 35–51. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2000.Google Scholar
Wall, Wendy. “Our Bodies/Our Texts? Renaissance Women and the Trials of Authorship.” In Anxious Power: Reading, Writing, and Ambivalence in Narrative by Women, ed. Wall, Wendy, Singley, Carol J., and Sweeney, Susan Elizabeth, 51–71. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Wall, Wendy. Staging Domesticity: Household Work and English Identity in Early Modern Drama. Cambridge Studies in Renaissance Literature and Culture 41. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wallace, Andrew. “Placement, Gender, Pedagogy: Virgil’s Fourth Georgic in Print.” Renaissance Quarterly 56, no. 2 (2003): 377–407.Google Scholar
Warley, Christopher. Reading Class through Shakespeare, Donne, and Milton. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Warren, Christopher N. “Samson and the Chorus of Dissent.” In Uncircumscribed Mind: Reading Milton Deeply, ed. Durham, Charles W. and Pruitt, Kristin A., 276–92. Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Webb, Jennifer D. “All Is Not Fun and Games: Conversation, Play, and Surveillance at the Montefeltro Court in Urbino.” Renaissance Studies: Journal of the Society for Renaissance Studies 26, no. 3 (2012): 417–40.Google Scholar
Weinfield, Henry. “Milton’s Rhymes: Sound and Sense in His English Sonnets.” Milton Quarterly 54, no. 2 (2020): 101–16.Google Scholar
Weiss, Nadine Tara. “Milton’s Arithmetic of Salvation in His Talent Sonnets 7 and 19.” Milton Quarterly 54, no. 2 (2020): 83–100.Google Scholar
Wilburn, Reginald A. “Getting ‘Uppity’ with Milton; or Because My Mom Politely Asked: ‘Was Milton Racist?’” Milton Studies 62, no. 2 (2020): 266–79.Google Scholar
Wilburn, Reginald A. “Malcolm X and African-American Literary Appropriations of Paradise Lost.” In Milton in Popular Culture, ed. Knoppers, Laura Lunger, Semenza, Gregory M. Colón, and Fish, Stanley, 199–210. New York; London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.Google Scholar
Wilburn, Reginald A. Preaching the Gospel of Black Revolt: Appropriating Milton in Early African American Literature. Medieval and Renaissance Literary Studies. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Wilding, Michael. Dragons Teeth: Literature in the English Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Williams, Deanne. “Chastity, Speech, and the Girl Masquer.” In Childhood, Education and the Stage in Early Modern England, ed. Preiss, Richard and Williams, Deanne, 162–83. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Willie, Rachel. “Spiritual Union and the Problem of Sexuality.” Milton Studies 47 (2008): 168–84.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Susan. “‘Public,’ ‘Private,’ ‘Politics’: Elizabeth Poole, the Duke of Monmouth, ‘Political Thought’ and ‘Literary Evidence.’” Women’s Writing 14, no. 2 (2007): 338–62.Google Scholar
Wittreich, Joseph. “Milton’s Transgressive Maneuvers: Receptions (Then and Now) and the Sexual Politics of Paradise Lost.” In Milton and Heresy, ed. Dobranski, Stephen and John, P. Rumrich, 244–66. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Wittreich, Joseph. “‘The Ramifications of Those Ramifications’: Compounding Contexts for Samson Agonistes.” In Milton in the Age of Fish: Essays on Authorship, Text, and Terrorism, ed. Lieb, Michael, Labriola, Albert C., and Cable, Lana, 167–99. Medieval and Renaissance Literary Studies. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Wittreich, Joseph. “Sites of Contention in Paradise Lost: Scenes of Instruction, Lessons in Interpretation.” In Milton’s Rival Hermeneutics: “Reason Is but Choosing,” ed. DuRocher, Richard J. and Thickstun, Margaret Olofson, 101–33. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Don M. “Limits of Miltonic Toleration.” JEGP: Journal of English and Germanic Philology 60 (1961): 834–46.Google Scholar
Woodbridge, Linda. Women and the English Renaissance: Literature and the Nature of Womankind, 1540 to 1620. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Woolf, Daniel. “News, History and the Construction of the Present in Early Modern England.” In The Politics of Information in Early Modern Europe, ed. Dooley, Brendan and Baron, Sabrina A., 80–118. Routledge Studies in Cultural History 1. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Woolrych, Austin. “The Debates from the Perspective of the Army.” In The Putney Debates of 1647: The Army, the Levellers, and the English State, ed. Mendle, Michael, 53–78. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. Literature and Politics in Cromwellian England: John Milton, Andrew Marvell, Marchamont Nedham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Wrightson, Keith. “The Social Order of Early Modern England: Three Approaches.” In The World We Have Gained: Histories of Population and Social Structure, ed. Bonfield, Lloyd, Smith, Richard M., and Wrightson, Keith, 199–210. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, Anne-Julia. “‘Betrayed My Credulous Innocence’: Mendacity and Female Education in John Milton and the ‘Battle of the Sexes.’” European Journal of English Studies 19, no. 2 (2015): 204–19.Google Scholar